Slashdot Mirror


PocketPC Wireless Webserver

Patrick Morris writes: "I learned that I could put Linux on my iPaq... so of course I did. I did a little research and found thttpd already ported to the ARM platform... So, I've got this poor little 206mHz ARM processor with 64mb running a webserver. Hey, it's kinda cool holding a webserver in your hand and being able to walk around with it."

100 of 321 comments (clear)

  1. 46 hits and not slashdotted yet? by metacosm · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am currently taking time (measured in seconds) until total slashdot meltdown of the poor little ipaq.

    1. Re:46 hits and not slashdotted yet? by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      300+ when I went.. very good I would say.

      Good idea giving your ipaq the stress test this way. Very, very cool hack.

    2. Re:46 hits and not slashdotted yet? by zardor · · Score: 2

      519 hits, and iPackedUp

      Do Not Surrender to the lameness filter!

      --
      -- We don't understand software, and sometimes we don't understand hardware, but we can *see* the blinking lights
    3. Re:46 hits and not slashdotted yet? by MaxVlast · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is it really that cool? (Disclaimer: It's slashdotted, so I can't see the details.) From the post, it looks like a guy installed linux on his ipaq and found a ported version of httpd, turned it on, and submitted the story. Big deal.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    4. Re:46 hits and not slashdotted yet? by mjstrom · · Score: 3, Funny

      That burning sensation in your pocket? That's your iPaq on Slashdot....

      1...2...3.... its down for the count.

    5. Re:46 hits and not slashdotted yet? by Locutus · · Score: 2

      This isn't too unlike Bill Gates putting a WiFi card in a flatpanel computer and acting like David Copperfield by walking around with it like it's magic. That capability has been built into X11 for over 10 years but it's big news when Bill finally figures out how to do it....

      You are correct, this is really no big deal but it won't get on the front of eWeek either.

      by the way, it must have been cool enough for you to click thru to the forum..... If you don't think a story is interesting, why not skip it?

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    6. Re:46 hits and not slashdotted yet? by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      I haven't done anything cool today, but I've done cool things in the past. I built a wearable webcam back in '98-'99. I think that's a lot cooler than installing software. I install software every day. I don't submit stories to Slashdot about it. Maybe that's why I'm not cool. If that's it, then I'm glad I'm not cool.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    7. Re:46 hits and not slashdotted yet? by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Well, the device wasn't responding, so I wanted to read the comments before being cynical. It might have been legitimately cool, but I wouldn't have known without reading the first few comments.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  2. Comment edited obviously by rhadamanthus · · Score: 3, Funny
    What he originally said was, "So, I've got this poor little 206mHz ARM processor with 64mb running a webserver, and I want to kill it"

    ----rhad

    --
    Slashdot needs to interview Natalie Portman.
    1. Re:Comment edited obviously by kzinti · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really. Do us a favor, Taco & Co.: the next time someone writes in to say that he has a web server running on his ancient computer / handheld computer / kitchen appliance / Craftsman power tool / wife's electronic pleasure toy, please DON'T BOTHER to post it unless the submitter can reasonably claim that said device can handle the slashdot effect. Now, if they have a how-to / making-of site complete with story and pictures, on a server that can handle the load, now that's cool. But this assisted suicide of unusual web servers is just kind of pointless and perverse otherwise.

      --Jim

    2. Re:Comment edited obviously by SuperguyA1 · · Score: 2

      Because the only interesting thing about this is seeing the webpage? What about the cool use of wireless technology. What about the potential of keeping your webserver with you to tell your family/friends where you are via http. Who cares about the /. effect. If the owner of the ipaq doesn't then no big deal. I don't mean to flame but I hate reading an interesting story only to be filled up with comments from people who don't care about it. IF YOU DON'T CARE WHY TAKE THE TIME TO COMMENT!

      --
      "as plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee" - Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz. (One man's humorous is another mans flamebait)
    3. Re:Comment edited obviously by errxn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I'd love to see a webserver on an "electronic pleasure toy" that can "handle the load".

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    4. Re:Comment edited obviously by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "I don't mean to flame but I hate reading an interesting story only to be filled up with comments from people who don't care about it."

      Try reading the comment you replied to a little more closely. The person explicitly supported the notion of publishing these things if there's an actual story we can read. But in a case like this, all we have is a Slashdot summary that boils down to, "So I, uh, installed the prepackaged webserver and stuff on my iPAQ."

      I hate the people who mindlessly bash every interesting project, but in this case, there's nothing to actually read about here. It isn't even an interesting hack, in that the webserver was apparently already packaged and ready to go. All this guy did was install it. And if he actually did more, we wouldn't know since there's no link to a robustly hosted story of what was done.

  3. It's just as cool by Enry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    as getting slashdotted. You dork.

    There's a bunch of web servers ported to ARM. Heck, my Zaurus can run Apache and PHP.

  4. ... not anymore by darekana · · Score: 2, Funny

    ya don't.

  5. This guys cool, but a little nuts... by Bryan_Casto · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone ever seen an iPaq burn before?

    --

    Bryan J. Casto
    bryan.casto(a)gmail.com
  6. We need a new Slashdot poll. by Tweezer · · Score: 5, Funny

    How long until this Ipaq is slashdoted?

    30 sec.
    1 min.
    5 min.
    10 min.
    1 hr.
    CowboyNeal

    1. Re:We need a new Slashdot poll. by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 2

      I got a connection refused, so I'm guessing it took about 5-10 minutes.

    2. Re:We need a new Slashdot poll. by zmooc · · Score: 2
      I haven't seen the site so I don't know how large it is, but last time I checked, a 200mhz pentiumpro was fast enough to fill a 10mbit link so I don't see how it's even interesting when it gets slashdotted; when the iPaq is properly configured, the uplink will be the bottleneck, not the iPaq.

      I don't see what the big deal is; a few years ago 200mhz/64mb was a pretty normal configuration for a webserver. The iPaq is just a bit smaller. Maybe if a take a picture of my cellphone running tetris, I'll make it to /. mainpage as well! woohoo.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    3. Re:We need a new Slashdot poll. by arivanov · · Score: 2

      Nope. These are numbers for normal/benchmark load. Not for half of the geek universe trying to get to it.

      After the link will get severely congested the number of SYNs flowing towards the IPAC will exceed what it can handle.

      In order to survive a slashdot effect on a low end device you need to rate limit them. Otherwise you are dead. In other words the slashdot effect nowdays is by no means different from a decent SYN flood.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  7. Before this poor little thing gets mashed... by DavidpFitz · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sure that this poor little beastie will buckle sooner rather than later, here's what it said: (Plus a hit counter underneath, at 165 when I visited)

    ---

    This server is running from a Compaq iPaq 3765 running the Familiar distribution of the linux operating system. The http server is thttpd which can be found here. Furthermore, this server is completely wireless. The only cable plugged in is a power cord to replenish the battery.

    1. Re:Before this poor little thing gets mashed... by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      Why Bluetooth? I would assume either compact flash WiFi card, or a PCMCIA WiFi card, that will bring you up to 11Mbps.

    2. Re:Before this poor little thing gets mashed... by DavidpFitz · · Score: 2

      I forgot to mention it's also got a picture of itself underneath the main text. It's not very exciting, just a picture of an iPaq and a bluetooth card. Took so long to appear I didn't realise it was there originally! Also, it seems to have timed out half way down. Poor little thing.

      Mind you, 610 hits and still going... I'm impressed. It must have had 500 in 5 minutes.

    3. Re:Before this poor little thing gets mashed... by WoofLu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok.. now you can stop .. the owner has finished heating up his meal!

    4. Re:Before this poor little thing gets mashed... by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      You can get a PCMCIA WiFi card for $70, that's not bad. It would make more sense to use that too. Since wouldn't using the Bluetooth require some hacking around? I don't know if you can do TCP/IP over Bluetooth without messing around, but as long as you have the drivers for the WiFi card it will work like a charm with no modifications.

    5. Re:Before this poor little thing gets mashed... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • here's what it said: This server is running from a Compaq iPaq 3765 [...]

      Aww, bless. It's like the real (the real) old days of the web, when you would actually hear by word of mouth that there was a new picture of a shiny rock or a dinosaur over at http://160.111.252.106, and you'd rush to view it! (And for those who weren't there, no I am not being sardonic).

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  8. Up to 239 hits now. by DysonSphere · · Score: 2, Funny

    about a 10 second access time..

    Put up some porn ;-)

    --
    Mommy. What's a karma whore?
  9. Ha by almeida · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Hey, it's kinda cool holding a webserver in your hand and being able to walk around with it."

    Right, cool until it melts in your hand and you end up looking like Johnny Tremain.

  10. The first webserver on an IPAQ by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 4, Funny

    is now the first slashdotted handheld device.

  11. So? by noahm · · Score: 5, Informative
    Honestly, what's the big deal here? There's a Linux box running a web server. Is that a big deal anymore, even if it runs on "exotic" hardware? I'm sure this isn't the first web server run on a handheld. It's definitely not the first web server run on a Linux handheld. And it's not the first web server run on a Linux handheld over 802.11b.

    Here, just for fun, is a link to my iPaq running thttpd over a wireless link. It's really nothing spectacular.

    noah

    1. Re:So? by dinivin · · Score: 2, Flamebait


      Agreed. I did the same thing with a IBM z50 last year. Slashdot is getting even more pathetic than usual, posting this kind of crap.

    2. Re:So? by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "Is that a big deal anymore, even if it runs on "exotic" hardware?"

      I have to agree with you on this not being anything noteworthy. Slashdot has had a number of interesting wacky webserver postings over the years (including the one that was supposedly potato powered and one running off a pinball machine), but the iPAQ one just can't compete on pure novelty. Hell, the platform isn't even particularly underpowered -- I'm sure there are quite a few traditional Linux boxes that've run webservers with less memory and processor speed.

      I could understand if it had some sort of actual feature on the site that related to its handheld nature (such as tying it to a GPS and allowing people to track the server), but that doesn't seem to be the case here (though it's slashdotted, so I can do little more than guess).

    3. Re:So? by realdpk · · Score: 2

      It's things like this that remind me of the good ol' days of the Internet. Call me nostalgic, but I have fond memories of the fishcams, the Internet-connected Coke machines, the Internet-controlled robotics, etc. It didn't matter if they were first, they were still fun toys.

    4. Re:So? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Here, just for fun, is a link to my iPaq running thttpd over a wireless link [18.24.6.206]. It's really nothing spectacular.

      Ah, you're just griping because the story submitter is getting a thorough slashdotting, and your server (as I write) is still up. Tell you what, I'll keep hitting refresh until it dies. ;-)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:So? by noahm · · Score: 2
      My question is WHY?? because you can??

      Well, there's nothing wrong with trying to do something just to see if you can do it, especially if it's somehow novel. But when it's a simple matter of running 'ipkg install thttpd' to get a web server up and running, there's nothing newsworthy about it. Hell, the mere fact that thttpd is already packaged with familiar should have been an indication to the guy that there's nothing new about the idea of a web server on an iPaq.

      noah

    6. Re:So? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      Call me crazy, but when your comment is at score 3, is it not? I clicked on the #3652860 but it has no moderation. I thought "underrated" shows up. On the reply screen, your comment is rated score 2. I refreshed the first screen and it is still score 3. What the hell? What bug is this, how does it happen?

    7. Re:So? by alistair · · Score: 2

      From Netcraft

      "The site 24-6-206.wireless.lcs.mit.edu is running thttpd/2.20c 21nov01 on Linux.

      Linux users include Rackspace, www.dialtone.com, www.vasoftware.com and Borders.com

      We have no uptime data for 24-6-206.wireless.lcs.mit.edu at present, and cannot plot a graph.

      The host 24-6-206.wireless.lcs.mit.edu has been added to the list of sites that we may monitor. We will start monitoring 24-6-206.wireless.lcs.mit.edu in the next daily monitoring cycle.

      We will continue to monitor this host for a few days, to get enough values to plot a graph. After this time the host will not be monitored again unless it's requested again, or it is one of the most frequently requested hosts."

      So for those that are intersted, keep checking this on Netcraft to see on the sitability of the wireless iPac as a hosting platform, you could even compare it to slashdot's uptime.

    8. Re:So? by noahm · · Score: 2
      We will continue to monitor this host for a few days, to get enough values to plot a graph. After this time the host will not be monitored again unless it's requested again, or it is one of the most frequently requested hosts."

      Well, I do plan on going home tonight, and I have better uses for my wireless card than to sit and accumulate uptime for my little web server. So netcraft is going to end up plotting a flatline for this guy.

      So for those that are intersted, keep checking this on Netcraft to see on the sitability of the wireless iPac as a hosting platform, you could even compare it to slashdot's uptime

      Now that would be interesting. I wish I had a microdrive so we could install slash on the iPaq and see how it would handle dynamic sites and databases. It's not having any trouble with the load from Slashdot. It's served over 3000 pages and it's load average is consistantly around 0. It hasn't had any trouble with the kids out there who keep clicking reload rapidly in an attempt to make it fall over.

      I do wonder how many pages the original story submitter's iPaq managed to serve.

      noah

  12. it's not the size of the cpu... by eyeball · · Score: 2

    poor little 206mHz ARM processor with 64mb running a webserver.
    We used to run a 100mhz sparc with 64mb that did 750k dynamically generated hits per day.

    It's amazing what is considered slow...

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
    1. Re:it's not the size of the cpu... by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Hell, when I was a freshman, I used a DECstation 5000 to serve a pretty busy webcam and an elaborate cgi-based dynamic site. It wasn't the fastest thing in the world, but it never got bogged down. People these days! Sheesh.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    2. Re:it's not the size of the cpu... by mj01nir · · Score: 2

      poor little 206mHz ARM processor with 64mb running a webserver.

      It's amazing what is considered slow...

      No kidding. My current production SNMP management box is a P133 w/ 40MB. It happily runs full-blown Apache, Postfix, MRTG, NetSaint, et. al. *Never* throw away old hardware! :^)

      --
      the no .sig .sig
  13. what's that you're ipaq'ing? by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny

    geek: "Hey, is that a webserver in your pocket?"

    me: "No, I'm just happy to see you."

    1. Re:what's that you're ipaq'ing? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Funny
      So, its in his trouser pocket, I just hope he hasn't got a web cam too...

      "Put it away- no take it; I mean, look away loooook awayyyyy"

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  14. It's dead, Jim by Dark+Nexus · · Score: 2

    I hit it at 359.

    Refresh and it was dead.

    Well, on the upside.... If it was the iPaq that burnt out and not the connection dying, he'll be able to try to fix it on his way to the hospital to get those burns he woulda got from holding it when it died!

    --
    Dark Nexus
    "Sanity is calming, but madness is more interesting."
  15. Obligatory visitor count post.... by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I reached it at 9:32am MST and it had 506 hits at that point. That was about 7 minutes or so after the /. post.

    I just went back there at 9:34am and could not reach the server.

    Elsewhere in a galaxy far, far away...but at the exact same time....

    - "what happened? Are you alright?"
    - "I just felt a great disturbance in the force. It was as if a million transistors in an IPaq all cried out at once, and then were silenced. I feel something terrible has happened."

    - A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.
    - AC

  16. R.I.P. by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 3, Funny

    iPaq webserver
    9:25am-9:35am (MDT)
    May it rest in peace.

  17. Zaurus by IceFox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For those that have a Sharp Zaurus pda we have been doing this for a while.

    How about Apache with PHP


    Or maybe the smaller Boa web server


    How about a GUI Server manager for these? (screenshots)


    Maybe put MySQL on it too have some more fun!


    How about instructions on how to set up all of the servers (including smb)

    There is nothign quite like getting your data by putting your sd card into the Z, selecting it as the root page and then browsing to it from another box.

    Benjamin Meyer

    P.S. How would you like to play Doom full framerate, multiplayer on the Zaurus! (for free too) It is coming soon! (Quake is more of a technical demo, can't do much without a floatingpoint, but if you want to see Quake on the Zaurus packages are already made.)

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    1. Re:Zaurus by IceFox · · Score: 2

      The link to the Quake demo:

      here

      --
      Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
  18. That's the Tiqit ... by SuperRob · · Score: 2

    The Screen Savers on TechTV had a couple of folks demoing a handheld REAL PC from Tiqit. A full 640x480 screen, built-in keyboard, PCMCIA, Secure Digital, docking ability. Price tag will be steep (upwards of $1000), and the processor isn't as beefy as I'd like, but the built-in screen is SEXY.

    1. Re:That's the Tiqit ... by Animats · · Score: 2
      The designer of the Tiqut showed it in EE380 at Stanford a few weeks ago. It's kind of cute to see a 640 x 480 screen running Windows on something that looks like a Nintendo Game Boy. You need a magnifying glass, though.

      It's not clear what it's for. They're still searching for the killer app.

  19. threaded webserver maybe ? (like apache) by johnjones · · Score: 2

    oh for gods sake ive been running apache on ARM for a long time

    the reason that you run apache is that it is threaded and can handle multiple connections at the same time and a bunch of other features that I wont list here see httpd.apache.org

    compared to thttpd wich while tiny has no real performance

    I wrote a webserver in about 200 lines so its not hard (mine had images as well)

    the cool thing would be porting a 802.11b stack to a uCOS or eCOS now that would be cool

    regards

    john 'MIPS rules' jones

    1. Re:threaded webserver maybe ? (like apache) by joib · · Score: 2

      Well, unless you're running apache 2.x, it ain'tthreaded...
      And thttpd is imho a select() based webserver, which generally means high performance.

  20. Sheesh this isn't special. by juuri · · Score: 2

    The 206mhz strongarm was the CPU used in lots of Network Computers, like the Dnard from Digital which became most of the NCs (that all flopped of course).

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  21. I must say though ... by TheViffer · · Score: 3, Funny

    /. history "might" have been made with this being the first "hand held" to feel the /. affect.

    Any also why did he do it?

    Because he could :-)

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  22. Re:the question is by danamania · · Score: 2

    will he run out of bandwidth, or processing power? it's 206mhz, but also, he's probably got a cable connection or some sorts

    Even at the relatively low amount of hits my server gets from posting here - and a few extra when I post the odd +5 modded post, it's bandwidth that's sucked up far before the machine itself crawls to a halt - and thats on a 40Mhz 68040!. Serving to my internal network keep shuffling along happily :)

    Getting it to the outside world isn't like pumping water through a small pipe... it's kinda more like trying to pee cold tar.

    a grrl & her server

  23. YO, PATRICK!!!! by mckwant · · Score: 2

    How long 'till it puked? I'm imagining the following conversation:

    Patrick: Please slashdot my handheld.
    Slashdot Community: Well, OK, if you insist.

    At least let us know how it went....

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  24. Not Really A Big Deal by great+throwdini · · Score: 2

    I mean, c'mon ... there is at least one person who ported Apache to Windows CE (ApacheCE), so it's not like this particular example is unique in terms of serving networked content. One wouldn't even have to go through the pain of configuring Familiar Linux, as was the case here. Slow news day already?

  25. The real potential of these devices by abe+ferlman · · Score: 2

    The real potential for these devices lies in giving individuals the inalienable right to surveil their personal surroundings at all times. Attach a tiny mic and webcam to this device. Goodbye police brutality. Human rights abuses? Perfect, realtime, documentation.

    Sure there's problems, but if airplanes get blackboxes, humans surely deserve something similar.

    Propose this in congress, and watch which agencies get themselves bent out of shape. Ask yourself what they have to lose from such a device.

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
  26. Load Test in Progress.... by bahtama · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Can't companies pay Slashdot and it's readers a ton of money to do load testing on servers? Now that would be cool. We could give out a "Slashdot-Proof" certificate or something.

    I was surprised to see Moshe Bar's web server handle the slashdot load just fine. He even says, The server handling this site is a noname PII 500Mhz machine with 256MB RAM, Apache 1.3.20, Mysql 3.23, Linux 2.4.18 and two IDE 6GB disks. Very simple hardware, but it still can withstand the Slashdote tide.

    So what troublemakers really should do is stop writing trojans/bots and instead concentrate on building a community website and make sure it becomes really popular. Then, when you want to unleash a DOS attack, forget bots, IRC and all that other stuff, just post it and away you go! :)

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

    1. Re:Load Test in Progress.... by realdpk · · Score: 2

      One of the biggest reasons sites succumb to /. is because their pages are created dynamically, either through PHP, perl (or ick, mod_perl), ASP, etc. If all you're serving is static content and you have your web server tweaked properly (in Apache, KeepAlive off, MinSpareServers 4, MaxSpareServers 4, StartServers == MaxClients) you can serve many hundreds of pages per second.

      You might need dual NICs or a gigE though. :-)

  27. Why would it die? by tweakt · · Score: 5, Informative
    Guys, it'n on 802.11 wireless.
    Running @ 200Mhz.

    Last time I checked that was more than enough for thttpd. thttpd is a non-blocking non-threaded design... (select()). It's supposed to scale BETTER than apache, etc..

    It will just have it's network link congested I think, but it won't *die* or *crash*.

  28. Timothy agrees by dfenstrate · · Score: 2

    Which is why he posted the story- to punish him for thinking he's creative when he's not. What better way to get the point across than to initiate a core melt down of his ipaq?

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  29. I thought timothy was smarter than that! by peterdaly · · Score: 2

    "Hey guys, you know how lots of big servers die when we link to them? I just approved a submition with a link to a webserver running on a hand held! I got a stop watch...want take bets on the number of seconds it lasts? Better hurry!"

    Come on timothy. How stupid is it to post to slashdot a link like this!?

    -Pete

  30. Re:the question is by danamania · · Score: 2

    Is that a Quadra 950?!? I always wanted one of those (well, after the 840AV of course ;-)

    Whoops - I lied! it's a 33Mhz 040 - in an Overclocked Quadra 605 - just for the fun of it - as with the iPaq. It's not like it'll REALLY kill the lil handheld - just keep it a bit occupied for a while!

    a grrl & her server

  31. Try out Linux on an iPAQ by Test+Drive · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you want to try out Linux running on an iPAQ for yourself, we happen to have one in the HP Test Drive Program. We also have a cross-compiling toolchain that lets you compile for the StrongARM from our Alpha servers. Additionally, we have a number of DEC Shark systems which are also based on the StrongARM processor available for your use.

  32. Hmm by alphabet26 · · Score: 2, Informative

    That is very cool... But I'm wondering if this would be a way to host "unsavory" web sites. For example, if you were posting code for building worms or a hate web site. It's easier to hide a ipaq then it is to hide a tower, monitor, keyboard, etc.

    --
    -AlPhAbEt
  33. Personal Web Server for PocketPC was promised... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...by Microsoft in the early developer kit promotion literature but it never was delivered. I suspect that the RIAA got to them and persuaded them to drop it because the last thing that they wanted to see was people sharing music/files on a mobile, wireless basis. Imagine a subway car full of people sharing music files.

    Now if someone could come up with a wireless, peer-to-peer Gnutella type client....

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  34. 'ipkg install thttpd' by moray · · Score: 5, Informative
    Yup, all you need to do to replicate this amazing feat is:

    • Take a few minutes to download Familiar
    • ipkg install thttpd


    There's also the BOA web server if you prefer.
  35. meanwhile on irc.openprojects.net/#handhelds.org by honeypea · · Score: 5, Funny

    raduga> check out headlines on slashdot!
    raduga> some crazy hacker has apparently managed to run linux on an ipaq!!!!
    dc_> OMFG
    dc_> who??
    dc_> I want one!
    raduga> i dunno
    raduga> but slashdot seems to think its amazing
    raduga> not only linux but an http server!!
    raduga> and wifi!
    dc_> hahaha
    dc_> omg.
    dc_> somone's actualy installed linux on an...
    dc_> iPAQ!!
    raduga> WEIRD
    * honeypea goes to read :)
    dc_> really
    honeypea> theyre really on the ball, arent they
    raduga> slashdot is news for nerds!
    raduga> er. you *are* a nerd, aren't you?
    honeypea> stuff that used to matter!

  36. Re:Personal Web Server for PocketPC was promised.. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Now if someone could come up with a wireless, peer-to-peer Gnutella type client....

    Now that would be cool and something I'd love to have a hack at, however, doesn't 802.11b require a base station? In other words, you can't have two people with wireless cards communicating with each other without going through a base station. If thats the case then you couldn't just wander out into the street and hook up with a bunch of people nearby as they'd need access to your network.

    Of course, you could just use bluetooth or IR, but that would mean you'd need 15,000 people stood just a bit too close to each other for comfort.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  37. Woo-hoo... by cluening · · Score: 2

    If I had known this was newsworthy, I would have posted a few months ago when I got my Visor (Manos, the Handspring of Fate) running httpd with a Xircom wireless ethernet module...

    --
    Posted from the wireless couch.
  38. Re:Personal Web Server for PocketPC was promised.. by macpeep · · Score: 2

    Yes you can. Either using ad-hoc WLAN or using GPRS. Or using Bluetooth. All three work great for me..

  39. Re:Why use an iPaq? by Grax · · Score: 2

    I thought the topic was "what kind of underpowered computers can we use to run a web server and the brag about it so slashdot so they can cripple it with many hits?"

    But what do I know?

  40. I have the Fuel Injectors running SMTP and my.... by Razzious · · Score: 2

    Thats right my car is a driving Network. The Chip running my fuel injectors is a mail server. My steroe is cleverly a front for a file server. I have the main combustion system running an apache web-server.

    The neat part is each of the disc brakes are actually Harddrives. Thats right and they are a raid too!

    Oh and I didn't bother with that linux stuff... ALL MS HERE....

    Anyone wanna Drag Race My Web Server?

    --
    Razzious Domini
    I could be a GREAT KARMA WHORE if I could just shed the few morals I have left.
  41. Re:Personal Web Server for PocketPC was promised.. by mocktor · · Score: 2, Informative

    >however, doesn't 802.11b require a base station?

    No - 802.11b has two modes, managed and ad-hoc. Ad-hoc sacrifices a bit of performance for the ability to join peer-peer networks that don't have any base station

  42. Toasted Webserver, In more Ways Than One... by virg_mattes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The point is to do something like this to demonstrate that it can be done, because it'll find a use eventually. For example, wouldn't it be really handy to take this toy to a conference, and after giving a presentation, host the support files on it for the day or two? That's just one use I came up with in ten seconds. The reason for doing this may seem silly now, but then the reasons for networking PCs together back in 1980 were fairly dumb, too. Sure, an iPaq won't handle much, but maybe the iPaq2 (or 3 or 4) will have the bandwidth necessary to make this happen. Who knows? But saying it's dumb because you can't conceive a practical purpose for it right now is short sighted and arrogant.

    Virg

    1. Re:Toasted Webserver, In more Ways Than One... by noahm · · Score: 2
      The point is to do something like this to demonstrate that it can be done, because it'll find a use eventually.

      Err, yeah, except that it was demonstrated ages ago and is just not news in any way at all. thttpd is included as a part of Familiar, the iPaq Linux distribution. What "research" did this guy do to find that it had been ported to the ARM? 'ipkg list'. Then 'ipkg install' and he's suddenly got a web server running on an iPaq. Wow, that's some 31337 h4X0r1ng there. If this was something new and different, it might be worth mentioning on slashdot. But it is not new or different.

      noah

  43. TWO IN ONE DAY!!! by mekkab · · Score: 2

    This is incredible news! Release all zig for great justice!

    There are two wireless Ipaqs running web servers!
    Maybe they will vie for control of the airwaves! It'll be duelling, http serving ipaqs!

    Every sentence ends in an exclamation point! The subject line has three! I have a very low threshold for stimulus so everything is exciting!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:TWO IN ONE DAY!!! by mekkab · · Score: 2

      OH MI GOOD GOLLY GOSH! You just blew my mind!

      Again!

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  44. Re:Personal Web Server for PocketPC was promised.. by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This sounds interesting.

    Do these iPAQs or Zauri come or be augmented with audio, for example?

    A portable web server that streams out live music or video from remote locations (concerts, theatres, seminars, political speeches) would be quite useful.

    Practically, though, you wouldn't want everyone connecting directly to the BW limited wireless device. Better to relay to a cache server with big pipes to handle the multicasting.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  45. Been there done that by cliffjumper222 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Two years ago -
    JUMPtec AMD 486 DIMM PC 66MHz running a Slackware with apache and pppd, getty etc. and ccam (connectix camera capture software) INSIDE a Omnipoint Redhawk 2000 GSM modem hooked up to a Connectix Quickcam bought on eBay for $40. Linked up to mobilewebcam.com (I let it drop so someone else has got it now). Unfortunately, most of this hardware is end of lifed but it was good while it lasted.
    The whole lot spent time between the dashboard of my car and being nailed to a tree looking at my house being built.
    The aim was to build a totally autonomous web cam capable of working anywhere. To avoid slashdotting (even a few hits maxed out the connection) we had it uploading JPEGs to a server but it could be accessed directly, no problemo. The only issue we had was the 9.6k circuit switched connection to the ISP would drop every so often, indeed there were telephone numbers that wouldn't even accept 9.6k connections! Nowadays, we'd use a miniscule GPRS module like this one to get a 33k uplink always-on Internet connection.
    One other problem was that the picture took quite a long time to scan - it was a parallel port connection. So if you moved the camera, like when I was driving, the picture washed out to white fairly quickly. When stationary it worked fine though.

  46. Slow news day? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

    About six months ago, somebody excitedly mentioned that they had successfully ported a webserver to WinCE. And I was thoroughly unimpressed, since the first thing I ever ported to the OS was Apache and it was almost a cakewalk.

    Now, somebody has done the exact same thing except they've bound the webserver to a wireless card. Is this worthy of another post? I say thee nay, CorporalBurrito.

    Anyway, I think the key here is that you palm kiddies don't understand an important thing about PocketPCs: they are not data managers, they do not simply replace a pad and pencil, they are not neat toys, they are not proof of concept demo pieces. They are PCs that fit in your hand, and anything you can do on a PC and fit into the 320x240 resolution you can do with a palm PC. My Cassiopeia has about the same power and ability of my old Cyrix 166, and I use it to do the same things I used to do -- I play games, I word process, I web browse, I manage files, I play music and movies, I compile programs and so forth. It's not like the palm world, where you're often crippled by the same design requirements that give you your long battery life -- a weak screen, a slow chip, little memory.

    Is it impressive that I can play networked Quake and use Java c-s apps and run PostgreSQL and ssh into my server wirelessly from my pocket pc? Yes. Is it newsworthy? Not on your life.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  47. /.ed Pocket PC by ehiris · · Score: 2

    Try explaining that to the Compaq tech support.

  48. Newton Message Pads... by heyjero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...have been doing this for a long time. Here is a site that lists a few running Newton Message Pad web servers.. http://misato.chuma.org:2110/ I didn't get to see the IPaq's page, but the Newton's pages listed here are pretty remarkable.

  49. How long before... by sterno · · Score: 2

    ... some clever hacker has a T-1 hooked up to the wife's electronic pleasure toy? :)

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:How long before... by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Funny
      ...some clever hacker has a T-1 hooked up to the wife's electronic pleasure toy?

      You'd need to find a hacker with a wife before that can happen...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  50. Re:It's pocket dotted! by colmore · · Score: 2

    isn't HATE a bit strong of a word? What's there to HATE? I mean, we don't even hate windows. We hate it's market dominance, we hate the business tactics used to gain that market dominance, we hate certain features of it that make working with it a chore, but we really just dislike the product itself and would prefer to use something for ourselves.

    Why do you hate the iPaq? It's certainly not a dominating market force, Palm OS products still command something like an 85% market share, it is a fairly resonably priced bit of equipment (half as powerful as a low-end laptop, a fraction of the size, and half the price)

    I can see where you'd get annoyed about the big deal everyone keeps making about PocketPC devices, but that doesn't mean you hate the products themselves. I mean, as far as I know, an Ipaq has never hurt anyone, no children were born without arms due to the Ipaq, the Ipaq hasn't been found to cause any sort of cancer.

    If you don't see the point, ok. If you'd buy something different for yourself, that's cool. If you think slashdot posted a story that isn't even really news, hey I'm with you. But too HATE the iPaq (all caps no less!) is a little extreme.

    I mean, if you HATE a little computer, what do you feel toward Osama Bin Laden? (or George W. Bush, I'll make no assumptions)

    I don't like this kind of language, because it devalues the few strong terms that the english language has left. I think there are some words that are meant to express strong feelings and should only be used as such.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  51. Check out the intimate project by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2

    This is old news... the webserver has been abailable on handhelds.org for a while now.

    More intersting in my opinion is the intimate project. Full Debian distro, in your pocket. I currently dualboot to Familiar/Qtopia (for PIM and such, it has a nice UI and fits on my 'paq without a CF sleeve) and Intimate (for everything else, it's a full linux distro). Check it all out at handhelds.org!

  52. Re:615 hits and not slashdotted yet? by colmore · · Score: 2

    Now I'm a little confused. 200 MhZ and 64 Megs of ram. Wasn't too long ago when that was standard issue for low-end webservers. I think with proper configuration, it should be able to handle a reasonably heavy load (certainly a few thousand hits)

    Or is the slowness and dropping just from the small pipe?

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  53. Killer Tiquit App by Llama+Keeper · · Score: 2

    The company I'm working with just got two test Tiquits, we are working furiously on a killer app. Think medical practices.

    --


    Rule of Life Number 2: Remember, it can all go to hell at any minute. --Jimmy Buffet
  54. Slashdot - the Dr. Kevorkian of the Internet by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 4, Funny

    Future Slashdot story:

    Man Claims Development of Invulnerability Fabric
    John Q. Public writes, "I just developed a new kind of fabric that renders the wearer invulnerable. I can be found at 123 Main Street, Smalltown, USA and I'll be wearing a suit made from this fabric in case anyone who reads this wants to drive by and take a shot at me."

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  55. Ad-Hoc Mode by Akardam · · Score: 2

    If memory serves, most 802.11b wireless card software allows the card to be put into Ad-Hoc Mode, which effectively eliminated the need for a base station. From what I remember, this significantly reduces your range, but it should work in the aforementioned subway car full of wifi users.

  56. 3G by 00_NOP · · Score: 2

    I do think these things are fun. Seems to be that 3G mobile phones will offer the ultimate in 'vanity' servers - does anyone know if the telcos are actively looking at hosting services going on their phones?

  57. Dead by SeanAhern · · Score: 2

    It's dead, Jim.

    1. Re:Dead by noahm · · Score: 2
      It's dead, Jim.

      Mine? 18.24.6.206? Yeah, I only have one wireless card, and I needed it elsewhere. In fact it is now plugged in to the laptop on which I'm typing this post.

      The iPaq handled the load well. It served up about 6000 pages during the day, and the load average was just about 0 the whole time. That makes sense, really, since thttpd only runs serially and was able to keep the single HTML doc cached most of the time.

      Maybe I'll plug it back in tomorrow to see if people keep trying to hit it.

      noah

  58. Re:615 hits and not slashdotted yet? by rodgerd · · Score: 2

    Wasn't that long ago it was a *high* end web server. Or a high end server, period.

    I'd be interested to know where the bottleneck on the system serving is, because you'd think a 200 MHz CPU serving content off solid state disk would scream along quite nicely.

  59. debian.lcs.mit.edu by noahm · · Score: 2
    This thing hauls ass! You should consider adding the kde debs from kde.tdyc.com. Deb heads would love a spry kde apt source.

    Yeah, the box is a 1 GHz P3 with a gig of RAM and a fibre-channel RAID array for storage (no internal disks at all...way cool). It does nothing but mirror debian.

    I don't have the disk space for extra stuff, but I'll happily add kde.tdyc.com once the new disks come. Maybe then I'll also be able to put up ISO images if they're helpful. I've already contacted the vendor and will probably install them by the end of the month. (and if you think SCSI disks are expensive, check out fibre-channel)

    And of course, it's on Internet2, so you'll get very good connectivity if you are on it too.

    noah

    1. Re:debian.lcs.mit.edu by noahm · · Score: 2
      Is this MIT funded box, or are you so hardcore you spent all this $$$ just for the debian cause? Either way you rule.

      It was paid for out of the budget for the group that I work for within the Lab for Computer Science. There are quite a few good mirrors here. Check out xyz.lcs.mit.edu for a bunch more.

      Is this really just a protocol I can compile into my kernel, configure a few things and just punch in a ipv6 link? Or is it much more complicated than that, requiring special network hardware and access. I'd love to play around with it, I'm sure we'll all make the switch one day, I'd like to be ready.

      You don't need to do anything special at all to be on Internet2, except be in the right place. You don't need to speak IPv6, either. Most I2 traffic is IPv4 generated by people who don't even know they're going over I2. The only thing is, you pretty much have no choice but to be at a US university in order to access I2. Chances are, if you're at one, and communicating with another, you're going over I2 without even needing to know about it.

      On the other hand, if you want to play with globally routable IPv6, there are tons of resources for that and you don't need anything that you can't download. I posted some links in a recent Ask Slashdot article on IPv6. Check them out. You will be able to speak IPv6 on the Internet using 6-to-4 translation, which Linux and *BSD can do just fine. Or you can get a free tunnel via Freenet6, though I've not played with that at all.

      Have fun.

      noah

  60. Palm Vx campus wide (CDPD) wireless web server by jaydho · · Score: 2

    Last year at Drury U in Springfield MO I had a Palm Vx ($199) with a Minstrel CDPD modem (off eBay for $40.) With that you have a dedicated IP anywhere in town and actually in the downstairs below the Commons (cafeteria.) We used to post log entries from the Palm during live band performances downstairs, anyhoo, we also had a web server on the Palm and it was pretty pimp.

    Here are some photos of the setup:
    Pimp Palm Vx with Minstrel Wireless Modem


    Shot of the Palm Vx serving web pages through httpd application (wirelessly!)

  61. It seems as though... by Scoria · · Score: 2

    ... he's replaced his "wireless iPaq" website with a more mundane version. He may have been merely attempting to advertise his URL freely to a wide range of individuals.

    After all, he didn't accomplish an amazing feat. A few commands and some retail hardware will render your iPaq a wireless webserver.

    --
    Do you like German cars?