Slashdot Mirror
Inside The World's Most Advanced Computer
Junky191 writes: "Just came across an informational page for the Earth Simulator computer, which provides nice graphics of the layout of the machine and its support structure, as well as details about exactly what types of problems it solves. Fascinating for the engineering problems tackled- how would you organize a 5,120 processor system capable of 40Tflops, and of course don't forget about the 10TB of shared memory." Take note -- donour writes: "well, the new list of supercomputer rankings is up today. I have to say that the Earth Simulator is quite impressive, from both a performance and architectural standpoint."
Biotches! I'll 0wn the CLIT soon
..my friend called Richard will actually take his cock out of his own ass one day! Hi Nanna!
The easiest way to validate these types of prediction mechanisms is to feed them only part of your data set and see how well it predicts your remaining dataset. For example, if you have an ocean temperature data set from 1920 to the present, you might start by feeding it 1920-1992 and seeing how well its predictions for then past ten years hold up to you actual data. You may think that the known data set it too small for accurate predictions, but there are some fascinating methods (like ice core sampling and tree growth sampling) that seem to allow pretty good deductions as to past climate conditions over a very long period of time.
"How does the computing power of Seti@home compare with existing supercomputers?"
"The most powerful computer, IBM's ASCI White, is rated at 12 TeraFLOPS and costs $110 million. SETI@home currently gets about 15 TeraFLOPs and has cost $500K so far"
Earth Simulator Project Total peak performance: 40 Tera FLOPS.
Of course the systems' architecture is different so using the speed to evaluate processing power is difficult.
There's a TFlop chart on the earth development button.
Simulating the Earth down to square kilometers will be impressive.
The Earth Simulator is running Super UX. The same operating system as the rest of the NEC supercomputers
The German Language TV channel 3sat will broadcast a 30 min film on Earth Simulator on Monday and 24th of June at 21:30 hours and on Tuesday, 25th of June at 14:30 hours.
You can get an SX-6i . The processor in ES is not made only for ES. And I don't think you would sell many supercomputers for IBM if you were advocating Gimp and Mozilla as applications...
NEC Press release mentions SUPER-UX.
NEC SX-6 page has lots of info.
I'm not sure how much you've looked up, so some of this information may be redundant, but here's what I've been able to dig up:
That's a beast of a chip! The packaging looks pretty substantial as well. I don't doubt the cooling systems are fairly remarkable, although I can't find any specific information about 'em.
cheers!
The ES is running a standard UNIX called Super UX which I guess is fully POSIX compliant and have the normal ANSI/ISO C compiler. You should be able to compile and run most Open Source programs including Gimp and Mozilla. I have compiled and used many GNU and Open Source programs like Emacs on the universitys Cray running UNICOS which also is a UNIX derviate designed for the Cray vector supers.
These machines tend to be clusters of smaller machines. IBM's SP architecture, for example, runs AIX which doesn't need to scale particularly well.
The magic in SP is partly hardware (high-speed interconnect between nodes), partly the admin software which allows admin tasks to be run simultaneously of many nodes (a non-negligible task), and is otherwise left up to the application programmers to use MPI or similar to get the application to run over the cluster.
Single system images typically don't scale this large. Cray's UNICOS/mk (Unix variant) is a microkernel version of the UNICOS OS, used on the T3E and it's predecessors, where a microkernel runs on each node, obviously incurring some overhead, but avoiding bottlenecks that otherwise occur as you scale. Here's some info. Last time I checked, T3E scaled to 2048 processors.
Out of the box, SGI's IRIX scales very nicely up to 128-256 processors. Beyond that "IRIX XXL" is used (up to 1024 processors, to date). This is no longer considered to be a general purpose OS!
IRIX replicates kernel text across nodes for speed, and kernel structures are allocated locally wherever possible. But getting write access to global kernel structures (some performance counters, for example) becomes a bottle-neck as the system scales.
IRIX XXL works around these bottle-necks, presumably sacrificing some features in the process. Sorry, I can't find a good link on IRIX scalability.
Nope. As others have pointed out it runs Super-UX, which is a commercial Unix variant all NEC's supercomputers run.
:)
Anyway, it probably S-UX.
My journal has hot
The SGI Origin2000 scales up to 512 processors. XXL refers to the product ID for IRIX for the larger versions of the O2k. SGI Origin3000 scales up to 1024 processors but is only sold as an actual product up to 512 processors. SGI has sold O3k's with over 512 cpus in a single system image to some customers, such as NASA, but it's not treated as an actual product.
Standard IRIX therefor scales up to 256 processors on O2k and 512 processors with the XXL version. The only difference between the two is that drivers for the former might not work with the later because a few kernel structures changed. The same is true for the Origin3000 versions of IRIX.