Slashdot Mirror


XPlay: iPod with Windows

meanie writes "Mediafour, a company which specializes in cross-platform software introduced the XPlay software to link up your iPod with Windows. Looks like a solid product, but since I didn't buy an iPod due to lack of a Mac, I haven't been able to check out the software. Anyone try this yet? I might just buy an iPod now."

23 of 297 comments (clear)

  1. Time to go to CompUSA by ejaw5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now if I get an Ipod I can go to CompUSA and download Office XP from a Windows PC onto the Ipod's hard-drive.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
    1. Re:Time to go to CompUSA by matthew.thompson · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No - Office v.X on the Mac is mostly self contained within it's own folder - many Mac products' install instructions are as simple as "Darg this folder to your hard-drive".

      Office XP on Windows requires product activation and ties itself extensively into your Windows Registry.

      So there's another reason to buy a Mac - software is easier to install :o)

      --
      Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
  2. Works pretty well (in beta, anyway) by Hollinger · · Score: 5, Informative

    I tried out the beta version with the 5 gig model. It works pretty well. I think they did a good job of extending the iPod's audience.

    One thing that the poster failed to note was that it does allow you to seamlessly transport files between the two platforms, and, in some cases, will even aid in file translation, by reading the MacOS file descriptors and translating those into simple extensions (.mpeg, .doc, etc.)

    I wonder if Steve's going to patch the iPod to make it incompatible with 3rd party software such as this?

    1. Re:Works pretty well (in beta, anyway) by dhovis · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I wonder if Steve's going to patch the iPod to make it incompatible with 3rd party software such as this?

      Don't be silly. This software saves Apple a lot of trouble. It will shut up everyone who has been clammoring for Apple to provide windows software, but Apple doesn't actually have to support it.

      The iPod is just a portable hard drive. The difficulty was getting Windows to be able to read the HFS+ filesystem, and the only thing that had to be reverse engineered was the iTunes File format.

      When Mediafour first anounounced this product, they called it xPod. Apple asked them to change the name and they complied, but that was the only request that they made. If it helps Apple sell more iPods without having to pay for support, Apple wins.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    2. Re:Works pretty well (in beta, anyway) by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I wonder if Steve's going to patch the iPod to make it incompatible with 3rd party software such as this?

      They are probbly not that clueless, but trying to boost sales of Mac by tying the iPod to it was a real clueless move in the first place.

      The problem Jobs has is that the iPod market is 5% of the size of the market that Archos, Nomad et. al. have access for. I don't think anyone is ever going to buy a Mac just to use an iPod.

      While the software probably works OK the only way it is going to allow iPod to significantly penetrate the Windows market is if Apple has enough clues to bundle it.

      Apple could have rescued the company by switching from being just a computer company with a stagnant and declining market share to an intelligent device company. But it can't do that if they tie their new products to trying to save their old one.

      What Apple management simply canot get into their heads is that the fanaticism of Apple users does not mean that the rest of the world is wanting to switch to Mac.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:Works pretty well (in beta, anyway) by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Apple could have rescued the company by switching from being just a computer company with a stagnant and declining market share to an intelligent device company. But it can't do that if they tie their new products to trying to save their old one.

      Yes, they are on the brink of collapse, aren't they? Better abandon ship before it's too late!

      Thank you for the insight, Elmer FUD. Apple is doing just fine at the moment.
      trying to boost sales of Mac by tying the iPod to it was a real clueless move in the first place.

      Was it? It sure sweetens the whole package. But do you really think they make money from it? I'd bet the profit margin on the iPod is very slim, whereas the profit margin on a PowerMac is larger than the retail price of the iPod (in any case, much larger). They would need to sell many many iPods to get the same profit as they would make if they pushed one person over to owning a Mac. And "converting" someone to the Mac is more valuable than just the monetary amount as well. Once the person has a Mac, they are probably going to buy more Apple products.

      Apple is looking out for the long term, and placing a few more iPod sales at such high importance is IMO shortsighted.

      I don't think anyone is ever going to buy a Mac just to use an iPod.

      No. But would they buy a Mac for the great Powerbook plus an iPod? And OS X? And the iApps? Etc etc. Don't you see that the iPod is just one small piece in this total user experience that attracts people to the product?

      mark
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  3. Deja vu :) by justin_w_hall · · Score: 5, Informative

    This sound a little familiar to anyone else?

    Guess the editors lack some long term memory. :)

    --

    ---
    "how can the same street intersect with itself? i must be at the nexus of the universe!" - cosmo kramer
    1. Re:Deja vu :) by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reason it's in the news again is that this is the final 1.0 product, not a technology preview or beta.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Deja vu :) by mccalli · · Score: 3, Informative
      XPlay costs money, Ephpod is free

      Ephod is free, but in order to use it you require Mac-drive reading software such as MacOpener or MacDrive. XPlay comes with this built-in.

      In other words, a direct comparison should include the cost of getting HFS+-mounting software in the first place.

      Cheers,
      Ian

  4. A costly little toy by falser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    $499 for the iPod, plus ~$30 for a firewire addon card (unless you have one on your mb, or have SBAudigy), plus $30 for the software... adds up to a very pricey little toy on a Windows machine.

    I've been sitting on the sidelines for a while now because of the costly barrier to entry, and pretty much given up on the iPod. Toshiba's unit, though maybe not as cute and revolutionary, makes a whole lot more sense on a Windows system both technically and financially.

    1. Re:A costly little toy by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hmm, you list $499 for the 10gb iPod, $30 for the firewire card, and $30 for the software.

      You do realize that the Gigabeat from Toshiba is only 5gb? If you want 10gb you need to buy a removable 5gb PC disk drive for $321?

      So it's now $559 vs $725? The iPod is cheaper.

      And if you're comparing to the 5gb version? Yeah, it's $459 vs $402. A $57 advantage to the Toshiba, which is bigger and bulkier, so you can say, you're paying for the size convenience.

  5. HFS Plus for Linux by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a sourceforge project for HFS Plus on Linux listed as an alpha kernel patch which seems usable as of 6/6. HFS Plus is the filesystem used on the iPod, and Linux already has good 1394 mass storage support, so somebody just needs to roll a nice song browser, and the linux users can have an iPod too.

    OK, Linux users probably don't need a song browser, but it sure would be nice. ;) ;)

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  6. paperweight by nanoscrew · · Score: 4, Informative

    my ipod was amazing for the time that it worked (about 5 days). Xplay was amazing, worked without flaw. I blame their lack of a "beta expired" message for killing my ipod. They put an error up instead which read "your ipod must be disconnected and reconnected to function since you recently did an ipod restore". I then proceeded to try other programs to fix it, ended up formatting the entire hard drive, and now whenever i plug it in it reboots my computer. xplay, i loved you, but why in hell did you not give a simple "beta expired" message??? my 400 dollar toy is now a farking paperweight!!!

    1. Re:paperweight by usr122122121 · · Score: 5, Informative
      [snip!]... my 400 dollar toy is now a farking paperweight!!!
      Quick fix:
      1) Find a mac.
      2) Use the mac to restore it to Factory Condition.
      --

      -braxton
  7. Apple is Next! by feldsteins · · Score: 5, Informative

    The word on the street is that Apple is going to release their own Windows iPod software as soon as Macworld July. Remember you heard it here first. Unless you heard it somewhere else already :)

    I suppose it's a good idea. Tons of folks have speculated that Apple sells more Macs because people want iPods and need Macs to run them. This may be true, but perhaps the iPod can be the "gateway drug" of PC to Macintosh conversion for some.

    --
    You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
  8. Been an XPlay user since beta 4 by mccalli · · Score: 4, Informative
    I've been a user since beta 4. Beta 4 blue-screened my system, so I got involved with the beta forums.

    Since then things improved rapidly, and the company is responsive to what people say. The software is working well for me (final beta, not upgraded to 1.0 as yet) and they even added a playlist-related feature that I requested.

    Its advantage over Ephod is that it includes an HFS+ reader with the software. Ephod requires you to have some form of Mac drive-reading software already (MacDrive or MacOpener), whereas XPlay comes with a stripped-down MacDrive driver anyway.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  9. iPod incomplete without iTunes by toupsie · · Score: 5, Interesting
    When the iPod was first announced, I ragged on it. Another MP3 player, YAWN! I already have a 6gig Archos Jukebox, why would I want an iPod? When it hit the stores, I still had to see one -- its an Apple product and I am an Apple Zealot. I walked into a store asked to see one, played with the jog wheel for 1 minute, looked at the display, pulled out a credit card and bought the sucker.

    Its great that Windows users will get to feed MP3s to this player, however, without iTunes, I think you will be missing the full "iPod Experience". I don't think I have ever seen a hardware product work so well with software. Its just plain seamless. Even my Mom was able to figure it out on the first try when my Dad gave an iPod to her after seeing mine. The VCR flummuxes her -- it has flashed 12:00 for three years.

    I am sure that XPlay is some devious plot by Steve Jobs to get all of you guys to switch. I don't see how XPlay can compete with iTunes in dealing with the iPod. iTunes is the best UNIX based MP3 player around, if not the best MP3 player, period.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  10. question for windows iPod users by paradesign · · Score: 3, Funny

    how do you update your iPod?

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  11. xPlay & iPod - music & file backup by AugustFalcon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have been doing the beta test stuff with xPlay on my 10 gig iPod and purchased the 1.0 version yesterday.

    I had a few minor problems with a couple of the betas with respect to firewire ports. In my case the Audigy Fireway ports sometimes hung, but many others had no difficulty whatsoever with the Audigy cards. I went to the Adaptec Duo card and have had no problems since.

    I have about 1,663 mp3s at 140 kbit or so encoding and have used about 7.34 gig of the 9.27 or so available. I use the remaining 1.92 gig to backup the office data daily. Works great. Obviously, it is not a longterm backup solution but it amounts to the belt part of my "belt and suspenders solution." It gives me that little extra comfort level.

    Now I just need to find a cassette adapter which will work in my GM car radio and I will be happy.

  12. Re:experiences by jht · · Score: 3, Informative

    The 4-pin FireWire port is perfectly compatible with iPod (or any other FireWire/1394 device, for that matter) - it just lacks the power leads that the larger port provides. So your Gateway notebook can't charge the iPod, but will be otherwise fine. Some devices (but not iPod) might require that power come from the FireWire bus, in which case you'd probably need a repeater with A/C power in.

    All Macs have the 6-pin port that provides bus power. Add-in PCI FireWire cards do, too.

    Just as a side note - all the DV camcorders I've seen (including my Canon ZR40) use the 4-pin variant - it takes up less space.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  13. Durable by Ster · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've have a 5GB version for about six or seven months. For the first few, until I got myself a belt-clip for it, I carried the little guy in my hand most of the time.

    I usually have decent coordination, but I guess there's something about having $500 of hardware in your hands that makes Nature want to mess with you. I somehow managed to trip two or three times while carrying my iPod, each while it was playing. There wasn't a skip, pop, distortion, or anything like that. When I plugged it into my iBook, it came up just fine, I could transfer files and music... In one case, I broke my fall with my hands, which put most of my body weight on one corner of the iPod. The result: a barely visible dent.

    Overall, I've found my iPod to be VERY durable. The poor thing's been dropped, broken my fall, been sat on, been in my backback going to and from campus on the bus (where backpacks routinely get kicked, tripped over, etc.), and I recently even left it sitting in the glove compartment of my car for one of the hottest weekends in Houston. No problems, and no damage beyond some faint scratches. (They really should have made the thing BRUSHED aluminum! Scratches don't show up as well, and neither do fingerprints!)

    Your mileage my vary, of course, but I don't consider my iPod to be very breakable.

    -Ster

    P.S. MacWorld did an iPod "Torture Test" in March 2002, and it held up quite well. Unfortuately, the article is not online, and I don't have that issue here right now. -S

  14. Re:DO NOT BUY an iPOD by Colol · · Score: 5, Informative

    It helps if you're playing with facts rather than a bunch of crap which isn't accurate.

    1. No, the battery isn't replacable by the user. But it holds a 10 hour charge quite admirably, and it's a long-life Lithium-based battery. By the tame you would need to replace the battery, you wouldn't be using the iPod you have now anymore.

    2. Of course you have to send it to Apple for a battery replacement. It's a special battery built just for Apple. However, it is trivial to dissassemble the pod and remove/replace parts.

    3. 90 day warranty is accurate. However, you can obtain a very cheap 2 year warranty from many brick-and-mortars selling it, Apple has been known to support it past the warranty, and many credit cards will double your warranty time.

    4. I've dropped my iPod 5 times. It still functions, and it isn't any worse for wear. The things are built to be solid, which is why...

    5. Solid state doesn't matter. First of all, 5 or 10 gigs in solid state would be ungodly expensive. Beyond that, though, the iPod *IS* solid state when it's playing! Unless your song exceeds half an hour, the hard drive comes on only long enough to copy it into the iPod's RAM, then shuts back down. There are no "moving parts" to worry about for most songs. On top of that, the drive used in the iPod is one of the smallest and most rugged drives on the market.

  15. Re:Uh, no, that's not right by drumgeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    While perhaps their intention was it would sell more Macs, Apple can, and does sell the 5GB iPod at 400 bucks and make a hefty profit. Look at a possible iPod competitor, the Toshiba GigaBeat. It uses the same 1.8" hard drive the iPod does, yet its removable and uses a PC card interface(read: more expensive), and they are marketing it for 400 dollars as well. Apples integrated solution, using their own software and hardware technologies, has to be much cheaper to produce. Although perhaps it was Apple's intention to sell more Macs with iPod technology, they KNOW its a good thing that 94% of the computer world is now able to use the iPod, which will bring in massive revenue to use to produce even more cool hardware (which will then, of course, be hacked to work with Windows).