Slashdot Mirror


Low-Tech Cell Phone Blocking

nigelc writes: "This BBC story reports on Japanese work to come up with a low-tech solution to cell phones in cinemas! Hey, if it can stop the person next to me from going 'Hey, dude, guess where I am?,' I'm all in favor of it."

155 of 548 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds great for the movies... by ChanxOT5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But what if someone can't call 911 because of the blocker?

    I would fear installing these things because of liabilities. What's annoyance compared to the safety value of being able to use a phone anywhere.

    1. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most theatres have pay phones. 911 is free.

      --
      GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    2. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      Just how much faster do you think the paramedics will arrive if you can call from inside the theater rather than having to go into the lobby? 30 seconds? Does that very rare 30 second savings counterbalance the thousands or millions of hours of life stolen from others by inconsiderate cell phone users? I don't think so.


      It does balance out if you're a paramedic or a doctor who has gone to a movie, knowing that they can be paged because they're on call, but that they don't have to worry about not being reachable.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    3. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      "There is no law requiring me to make sure your phone works in my establishment."

      Perhaps not, but the problem with the movie theater example is that it gives the phone companies the ability to extort money out of people. "Well, we'll just raise the price of pay phones to $1.50." Before you tell me that won't happen, look at the cost of a Snicker's next time you see a movie.

      They are intentionally blocking the signal, they are (in essence) jamming it. I don't like it when people talk in the theater, but I'd rather throw popcorn at them then not be able to recieve an important call.

      If I *ever* leave a theater, check my voicemail, and find out my gf was in a car accident and had been in the hospital for an hour, you can bet I'd sue instantly.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Actually, what I would expect doctors or paramedics to do if they are on call is to set their phone to forward calls to the theatre. If it's a genuine emergency, I doubt the theatre would have a problem paging them. Considering this is likely the exception and not the norm, I don't think it'd be a problem. And I can't imagine a doctor with a cell phone not being able to have access to a cell phone plan with such capabilities.

    5. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by Banner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This response is Extremely Lame.

      What are you going to do when someone shots you because you answered your phone in the middle of a movie? I've seen people beaten for answering their phone in a movie theater, and have read news stories about worse things.

      You can find out if your GF has been hurt in the course of due time like most people. Finding out sooner ISN'T going to change the world.

      And personally I DON'T CARE about your GF, and my being bothered by you so you can find out is very low on my list of priorities. My world (in fact 'THE' world) doesn't revolve around you. Maybe you shouldn't go to movies, in case something should happen while you are in there.

    6. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      One day, you'll have a girlfriend, and you'll understand.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      I don't mind people answering a cell phone during a movie if they suspect that it might be an emergency...

      ...provided that they leave the theater before doing so.

    8. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      You're absolutely right. Everybody in the world who uses a cell phone is a total goit. We better start jamming their signals right away! Afterall, those bloody Americans who care to keep in touch with their families are ruining my ability to watch shitty movies!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      911 doesn't contact nearby doctors, they send a paramedic team to take you to the doctors. Dr. X wouldn't get called anyways.

    10. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 2

      The Constitution doesn't guarantee that you have the right to not be annoyed by other people. You have no right to take my personal freedoms away because of the occasional dumb-ass.

      What personal freedoms? You are not being forced to see a movie with your cell phone. Nobody is shutting down the entire telephone network while a movie is in session. (Talk about a woefully incorrect analogy.) They're blocking it in one specific place, on private property.

      You don't like it? Don't go to those theaters. If lots of people don't like it, the theaters will change their mind.

    11. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      "Well, we'll just raise the price of pay phones to $1.50."

      Well, I'll just walk 10 feet out the door of the theater, make my call, and walk back in.

      you can bet I'd sue instantly.

      You can bet you'd be laughed out of court instantly. Hospitals make you turn off your cell phone, so do some restaurants. If you don't like it, don't go in. Otherwise, deal with it and stop moaning about it.

      Really, you're acting as if these theaters are vaporizing patrons' cellphones on entry. They're stopping you from getting a call - there're plenty of buildings that do that accidentially! So please, shut up about it already.

    12. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      You have no right to take my personal freedoms away because of the occasional dumb-ass.

      Personal freedoms like, say, watching a movie without people chatting away on their cell phones next to you?

      Congrats, you just learned the meaning of "self defeating argument".

    13. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Personal freedoms like, say, watching a movie without people chatting away on their cell phones next to you?"

      You have no Constitutional right to shut anybody else up. Ooops, I guess your over-simplification doesn't really work, does it?

      I think it's very amusing that people are quick to argue against what I'm saying, but they're not giving me any reason why I should be for it. I concede on the 911 thing (nevermind 911 is not always the # you call. If you have debilitating migraines and you need to talk to your specialist...), but seriously, besides stopping those 'oh so annoying' phone calls, what benefit is there?

      What happens when other places like the mall starts doing it? And trust me, they will right after installing more payphones.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      You have no Constitutional right to shut anybody else up. Ooops, I guess your over-simplification doesn't really work, does it?

      Actually, the theater does. It's private property, thus they can ask you to leave your cell phone at the door or to turn it off or to shut the hell up, if they so desire.

      It's just like asking people to check concealed weapons at the door. If you don't like their policy, you don't have to go in.

    15. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by aulendil · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and find out my gf was in a car accident...

      Nah, is this all hypothetical? You are a slashdot reader, how could you possibly have a gf... ;-)

    16. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by ceejayoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If he's on call, he should do one of the following things:

      a) not go to a 2 hour movie, wait until he gets off call
      b) leave his pager at the front desk and ask them to get him if it goes off

      Simple enough. People apparently survived when we didn't have cell phones, so saying that blocking them in movie theaters is going to result in the downfall of Western civilization and whatnot is a bit extreme.

      p.s. in my experience, pagers seem to get better reception than phones do - this might not block them anyways.

    17. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>Payphone have actually been coming *OUT* of malls because of the explosion of cell phone use

      Not only that, but with shielding, they'll have people with cell phones coming *OUT* of malls to talk, disrupting traffic, etc.

      Also, there's the other problem with your (i.e., the author of the mall thread, not the author of this post's parent) analogy: malls are made for SHOPPING. Theatres (Concert Halls are another place that I suspect will be even more inclined to embrace this technology) are made for people to have the experience of WATCHING A MOVIE -- now that we're post 1920s, this includes sound. Ideally, from the theatres' and patrons' point of view, sound that is uncontaminated by people yakking away on cell phones.

    18. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Also, for anything that's so life-and-death critical as to have five minutes make a difference, they'd generally have someone at the hospital capable of dealing with it, at least for a few extra minutes.

      Really, the bigger issue is that the doc might be 15-30 minutes away from the hospital. And yes, ambulance paramedics usually aren't watching movies on shift :-p good point

    19. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      So what you're really saying is that there is a much easier, less extreme solution then. Thank you. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    20. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      That was definitely one of the most intelligent responses in this thread, thank you.

      I have rebuttals to them, but I wanted to let you know I respect what you said and how you said it so you don't feel like I'm just being an argumentative jerk. :)

      Payphones take up space. Payphone have actually been coming *OUT* of malls because of the explosion of cell phone use. -- Yeah, that's because it's too expensive to keep them there if nobody uses them. (I saw a story on the news about this a few months ago...) If the cell phones suddenly stopped working, they'd have to add payphones to meet demand.

      "Law Enforcement and Security use radios and cell phones..." -- That's a good reason why nobody should use them. At least with a cell phone jammer, they could turn that off, or be discriminate. In this case, an over-reaching solution to the 'problem' would work against them. Good point. :)

      "Cell phone calls can lead to sales. Not sure exactly what item someone wants when doing your Christmas shopping?" -- I see what you're saying, but I don't think the mall owners would worry about that. Their money comes from the stores paying rent. IF they installed payphones, they'd get money directly from people using them. They wouldn't notice any significant change in income from a surge in cell phone buying.

      Although there might be cases where they would. Like if 3 more tenants moved in to sell cell phones, they obviously would get more money. But if a store makes %10 more this month than last month, the mall won't see a difference.

      Again, thanks for the thoughtful rebuttal. I'm sick of people taking pokes at me simply because I don't agree with them. Afterall, I must be a moron if my opinion is different.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    21. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "So you really think you should be able to receive every phone call, even in the movie theater?" -- Yes, that's why I bought a mobile phone. To be clear: That doesnt mean the phone should be allowed to audibly ring. I have no problem with turning sound off. There are idiots in this thread that think what I want is to chat during the movie, I'm not suggesting that at all.

      "I'm not sure how you propose to receive only the important ones and not the unimportant ones, after all." -- Caller ID.

      "This would not open up any special opportunities for pay phone companies". -- Actually, yes it will. If a mall, for example, were to implment this, then they'd be able to charge whatever they wanted for payphones. Most people would not prefer to walk outside the mall just to call and say "Im going to be late for dinner. Before you tell me I'm wrong, consider that people can easily decide not to use IE, yet MS still was ruled a monopoly for putting it into the OS. No, I'm not trying to draw a paralell between this and jamming cell phones. I'm saying that if you remove one competitor the other can screw the customer.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    22. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by BarefootClown · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I should be able to put people in physical danger so I can talk to my girlfriend on the flight.

      Physical danger? Not quite. Cell phone signals do not even come close to affecting aircraft avionics; the frequencies are all wrong, and with even the fundamental being above everything we use, harmonics aren't even an issue. The real reason for the prohibition is the FCC--when you're up high, you can hit a lot more cell phone repeaters (see also: 39,000 foot tall antenna tower), taking a disproportionately large portion of the infrastructure. You can rest assured that using a cell phone in flight will not put anybody in danger.

      Incidentally, I'm a flight instructor and instrument flight instructor, so I do know a little bit about these things. Just so you know.

      --

      "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
      --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    23. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2
      >"Law Enforcement and Security use radios and cell phones..."
      -- That's a good reason why nobody should use them. At least with a cell phone jammer, they could turn that off, or be discriminate. In this case, an over-reaching solution to the 'problem' would work against them.


      The radios that security guards and emergency services *aren't* mobile phones. You'd probably find that these ferrite panels will absorb microwaves really well, but let the VHF and UHF stuff that the police radios pass right through, more-or-less unattenuated. If not, it could be redesigned to do so. If that didn't work, it would be no great shakes to stick a repeater inside the building - which, at least in the UK, many large shopping centres do (hint - steel framed building, many "radio shadows").

    24. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2
      Some wheelchairs use gps among other things to allow disabled people to get around on their own.


      I bet they work really well in buildings. Bear in mind that GPS is only accurate to a few metres unless you've got military equipment, and doesn't pick up a signal inside anyway...

    25. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      It's not pettiness, it's because they don't want you pissing off their paying customers.

    26. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2
      Doesn't work that way though. This is why you can get an AM radio station in a steel building a lot more easily than you can get VHF. This is something you can try yourself, too. Go to a large, steel-framed building, with a portable radio. Or, better still, a steel-framed, aluminium-clad building.


      Incidentally, a waveguide acts as a *bandpass* filter - rather like a conventional tuned circuit. Off-resonance it's an extremely high impedance, and relatively low impedance at resonance. This is, of course analogous to a tuned circuit which is a low impedance off resonance. If you look at the RF stage of a simple TRF receiver, you'll see that the tuned circuit is connected between the antenna and ground. It shunts any signals *not* at the resonant frequency.

    27. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "I may be quibbling now, but I dont' think Caller ID would be enough to let you identify urgent calls, which was why I assumed you'd want to anser every call. "

      Good question. Here's what I do at a theater now: My cell phone is set to silent. When a movie has a boring part (every movie has a boring part) I sometimes take out my phone, turn it towards the movie screen (for light, I don't use the backlight), and look for a voicemail icon. Before I check the voice mail, I look at the caller ID. If it's from my dad, for example, then it's probably bad news because we chat once a week at a certain time on Sundays. (to my disgruntlement, usually during the Simpsons...)

      If it's a number I don't know about, then I wait for the voice mail indicator to come on, then I hit 1 to check it. Let me be clear about something here: My phone's not making *any* sound, and I turned off the backlight. I normally sit in the back and this behaviour has never caused anybody to glance at me. If the voice mail is urgent, I step out of the theater and return the call. Let me be really clear, if I got so much as a glance about it, I'd just leave the phone off and be done about it. However, I'm 100% convinced that I'm not bothering anybody so I don't want to be punished because some other jackass isn't as considerate.

      My phone does not ring very often. I think I get a call every couple of days at most. I guess I'm in the minority there. I go to a lot of movies, I've seen a couple of people do stupid stuff with cell phones, but I honestly cannot remember any cell phone related even that made me want to 'break somebodys nose'. (...as somebody threatened to do to me earlier in this thread.) Heck, I can't remember a single cell phone event in the last 5 movies I went to. My biggest complaint about movies, by far, is crying children/babies. Hopefully now you can understand why I don't think the right solution is to block the signals all together. I think it sets a bad precedant. And the people here have cornered me into making ridiculous extremes (that I'm embarrased about) in order to try to get them to see that this particular way of stopping this problem is over-reaching and unncecessary. Some of them think that violence is the answer. Go fig.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    28. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "...This would be used in small, enclosed places where people are already expected to be quiet -- "

      Yeah, you're right. I just had a vision like this:

      First they start blocking it in theaters. People like it.

      Then they do it in sections of a library. People like it.

      Then suggestions like "Why not just use electronic cell phone jammers?" suddenly start getting serious support.

      Then people find they cannot use their cell phones in a good chunk of a city.

      Likely? Probably not. In the same vein, though, people don't like when the Gov't installs things like video cameras in public for fear of what might happen, rather than what is happening now. I kinda thought people'd understand my point of view. (agreeing is a different story)

      Oh well.

      I do appreciate your tactful response. Most of the people in this thread were directly attacking me.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    29. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Every movie theatre I've been to in the last few years has displayed a full-screen request before each movie asking you to switch off your cell phone - and most people in the theatre are polite enough and considerate enough to do so. These theatres don't need to "jam" phones..."

      Oops, you just walked into my argument there buddy. I've been saying ALL ALONG that there is no need to jam cell phones. You conceded on that. End of story. I win. Thank you.

      "because their clientele are not as rude and self-centred as you. But that's hardly surprising, since you're an American..."

      Ooooo that's FUNNY!! I argued in the beginning that I was concerned about the welfare of my family, and the response I got from you was "I want cell phones jammed in theaters because they bug me, even though I just said that people are polite enough to turn them off."

      I am the self centered one? I'm not the one crying because I'm worried about my precious movie. Heh. I think the proper phrase here is "That's like the pot calling the kettle black." Wow, I can't believe you self destructed your own argument just so you could take a dig at my being American. That is humorously petty.

      So let me ask you something: Where are you from, anyway? Is it a common trait over there to make extremist assumptions about somebody you don't even know, or are you unusual over there? I'll tell ya something: stereotyping people is far worse than being 'self-centered'. That's gotta sting alot since you get so amped up over a silly movie.

      Heh this is definitely one of the strangest posts I've seen in a long time, but it put a smile on my face. Thanks man. :) Have a good day.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    30. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "ASk yourself this: How come you're spending SO MUCH time making SO MANY posts to SO MANY people who don't agree with you. Could it, perhaps, be, that you're WRONG?"

      Nope. If I were wrong, people wouldn't have gotten so hostile with me right away. Instead they would have responded to me in a way that'd make me say "oh, you're right." I've done that before, it's not in my character to try to keep from losing face.

      Your attempts to insult me here (and unwillingness to tell me where you're from, which makes me think you really are in the USA) are a reflection of all the silly responses that people have made. And your comment about the KKK was detestable. The "Your whole country is bad because it had the KKK" attitude is far worse than being 'self centered'. Not only is that oversimplification, but it's distracting from the real point. Which lends me to believe that you have no argument to my point, rather you're trying to win by making me get pissed of. Aint happenin. I aint that emotionally involved.

      As for why I keep replying:

      You all assume I want my phone to ring audibly in theater. I never said nor implied that.

      You all assume I want to talk on the phone during a movie. I never said nor implied that.

      You all assume that my desire to keep my phone available is petty. I never said that. As a matter of fact my original reason for not wanting it jammed is very understandable. Personally I think that my mentioning that I had a GF to keep an eye on rubbed a few people the wrong way. (Before you take personal offense at that, let me explain: right after I made that comment somebody mod-bombed me, costing me 5 karma points. That one comment got somebody so mad that they used all their mod points to 'teach me a lesson'. They went back to convos that hadn't been active for several days and modded me down. I also got a bunch of responses that were attacks on my gf, one referring to her as a 'cow'. I'm supposed to conceed because somebody thinks my gf is a cow? O_o oooookay)

      So the real reason that I'm continuing to respond is bcause none of you are even close to understanding what I said, even though you touched on my point yourself... TWICE. I'll quote you again:

      "There's no need to jam cell phones WHEN PEOPLE TURN THEM OFF VOLUNTARILY"

      You said earlier that they are. Then, you conveniently take that back so you can argue with me. Which is a startling clue that cell phones really aren't that big of nuisance. (Let's face it, if they were, there'd already be strong attempts to stop it.)

      So what's the point in being so extremist? It's incredibly selfish to say "I'm overly sensitive to this, therefore we should physically prevent that from happening no matter what the reasons are." Sorry, but I'm not the one being self centered here. The reason you think I am is because you think I want to annoy people at theaters. Let me explain this now: No I do not. Even though I almost never get calls, every time I go to a theater I set my phone to silent. That won't change because I do have respect for other people in the theater. Don't try to use that against me again. It's not worth it. The main reason I keep saying 'you dont understand what Im saying' is because you continue to apply stereotypes to me that aren't true. If you were to understand that I take every precaution I can to not disturb people, then you understand why I don't want to be punished for something that happens occasionally at best. If you still think I'm 100% wrong for feeling that, then there's no hope we'll ever come to some sort of agreement.

      If you're going to write me a heated reply, then I would encourage you to read this one more time first. I have no desire to keep this stupid debate going. You are perfectly free to disagree with me, all I ask is that you understand why I feel the way I do. If it's because 'im a self centered American', then you are 100% missing the point of everything I have said, and you are a bigot to boot. If you can say "I see his reasoning now, but I don't agree with it." then it's settled, and we can move on.

      Okay?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    31. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Heh. "I couldn't win the argument, so I'll fling insults at you instead."

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    32. Re:Sounds great for the movies... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      heh "I know you are but what am I?"

      Yah, you're really taking your defeat gracefully. lol

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  2. HELL NO! by SkyLeach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but like most of the /. posters I keep my cell phone on vibrate ALL THE TIME. I'm not going to be rude and talk in the theater, but I HAVE TO GET MY TEXT MESSAGES.

    "Dude, the servers are down" is the most important message I can get from mon!!!! If I can't get to one or the other data center things start going to shit fast.

    Note to owners: This is a great way to get me to stay way the fsck away from your theater if you install it.

    --
    My $0.02 will always be worth more than your â0.02, so :-p
    1. Re:HELL NO! by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Note to owners: This is a great way to get me to go to your theater if you install it. Hell, I'd pay another .50 cents a ticket for this capability.

      Of course, I'm good enough at what I do to be able to take time away without worrying the world will end.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  3. 802.11b network security by happyclam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So if I read this right, this paneling also blocks 97% of Wi-Fi (802.11b) signal strength? So if I want to secure my wireless network, I panel the outside walls of my building with this type of paneling, making it so that the warchalkers of the world can't get the signal? And any time I need to go building-to-building, I wire it.

    (Yes, I realize this only works if you don't need access outside the building, but many applications wouldn't anyway.)

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    1. Re:802.11b network security by Suicyco · · Score: 2

      But then you couldn't use cell phones in the building... I know where I work that would freak the hell out of the salesmen.

  4. Problems by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 2
    So let me see. If you're a doctor with a cell phone or pager that is to be used in an emergency, you can never go to a movie because the hospital will not be able to reach you. And this is a good thing?

    Everyone who wants to avoid cell phones will create "pockets" of "no-phone-zones" around public places, making the mobile nature of the phones useless. "Not in my theater", "not in my restaurant", "not in my pub", etc. That will also create interference for phones in "legit" areas. (Right outside that theater, restaurant, etc.)

    So the phone companies will, of course, modify their system with "new and improved, block-proof service!" Higher power, different frequency, more sensitive equipment, etc. All at a higher price for consumers. So we have buildings that make it difficult to use cell phones, and expensive phones that will work despite the buildings designed to keep them from working. And what have we gained, exactly?

    The solution is so much simplier. Tell the jerk next to you in the theater to get a phone with a vibrate mode and to actually use it, and to have some repect for those around him. Turn off your own phone in the theater. In general, use common sense and common courtesy.

    You can't solve a the problem of people being rude with technology. They'll find some way to be rude anyway.

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

    1. Re:Problems by Olinator · · Score: 2
      Blockpoth the quoster:
      You can't solve a the problem of people being rude with technology. They'll find some way to be rude anyway.

      I think you misspelt "You cannot fix a social problem with a technical solution"

      HTH, HAND.

      Ole
      (Not that you aren't 100% right, of course. I was just being persnickety.)
  5. GSM interference by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

    ...until now, there has been no way of enforcing silence.

    Ever heard a GSM phone, blasting at full power trying to reach a base station, interfere with a powerful amplifier?

    Better cover your ears if you're sitting close to the speakers.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  6. Poor Man's Farady Cage? by EQ · · Score: 2

    Panel your interior with this stuff. It'll be crap for getting cell calls in the house, but hell for anyonetrying to get your data short of tapping your net feed. And mount an exterior antenna (something liek a cheapo repeater) to "pipe in" the signals you want. A real RF Firewall. Heh.

    --
    Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo! http://goo.gl/J9bkO
  7. External Blackspots by twoshortplanks · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The main trouble with this as I see it is that it won't only cause a problem for people inside the enclosed room, but for people in the "shadow" of these structures.

    Now, I understand that you get reflection and you can normally see more than one antenna, but this could cause whole other problems with people sheilding other areas as a side effect. I mean, what if I live next door to a cinema and they install this? Suddenly I can't receive mobile phone calls in my house because I'm in the shadow of the cinema!

    This raises all kinds of interesting issues. Can I force another property to stop blocking my radio waves? Does it devalue my property (probably, in today's modern soceity, yes.) I know whenever I've looked for places to live in the last few years one of the first things I do when I walk in is see if I can get mobile reception.

    --
    -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    1. Re:External Blackspots by BlueWonder · · Score: 2
      The main trouble with this as I see it is that it won't only cause a problem for people inside the enclosed room, but for people in the "shadow" of these structures.

      Agreed. I wonder why cell phones aren't designed in such a way that they react to a special signal by switching themselves off (or silent). Such a signal could be transmitted at the entrance of cinemas, theatres, hospitals, and airplains, and if it had a very short range of only a few meters, it would not cause any disruption for people outside the building.

      Of course, this system would only work if I'm correct in assuming that most people don't intentionally leave their cell phones on in the cinema, but forget to switch it off/silent.

    2. Re:External Blackspots by Ellen+Ripley · · Score: 2

      Can I force another property to stop blocking my radio waves?

      Not morally.

      What you're really asking is whether you can force people to allow you access to their property. The short answer is no, it's their property. If they want to keep radio waves, ultraviolet radiation, smoke, fog, air pollution, sonic energy from bass-heavy car stereos, neighborhood pets and children, communists, capitalists or hippies off their property, they have the right to do that.

      I mean, what if I live next door to a cinema and they install this? Suddenly I can't receive mobile phone calls in my house because I'm in the shadow of the cinema!

      Tough. You shouldn't have presumed access to their property.

      Ellen

    3. Re:External Blackspots by twoshortplanks · · Score: 2

      It's not God's fault there's a limestone bluff in the way - it's the mobile phone providers. Them not having provided enough transmitters to provide service in an area is one thing. Another person taking efforts to deliberatly block mobile phone signals is another.

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    4. Re:External Blackspots by twoshortplanks · · Score: 2
      Not morally
      However, unfortuantly when it comes down to it morally has oft very little to do with actuality where the law is involved.

      Interesting points, certainly one worthy of debate (though not by me, having no strong feelings either way.) You could view it in the same way that it is prohibited to build anything you want on your property (you need planning permission) - for example, you can't easly get permissions to build anything that will block visiable light from neighbouring properties.

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    5. Re:External Blackspots by suss · · Score: 2

      I mean, what if I live next door to a cinema and they install this? Suddenly I can't receive mobile phone calls in my house because I'm in the shadow of the cinema!

      If you live next to a cinema, there's other reasons you can't make mobile -or any other kind of phone calls-...

      [ring ring]
      "Yes, Hello?"

      [cinema next door]: BEGUN THIS CLONE WAR HAS !

      "Can you speak up? There's several thousand watt speakers next door!"

      You see my point?

  8. All I want... by Have+Blue · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is a personal cell-phone anesthetizer. So I can reach into my pocket and push a button, and every cell phone within 10 meters stops working for 30 seconds (or at least long enough to drop the current call). It doesn't completely solve the problem but it would be very, very satisfying :P

    1. Re:All I want... by BJH · · Score: 2, Informative

      They sell them here in Japan - 5000 to 10000 yen ($US40-$US80) for most of them.
      A magazine did a study of them, and it looks like most of them don't really work that well, unfortunately - maximum of 1-2 meters radius around you.

    2. Re:All I want... by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      ...and the movie projector, if you're watching a movie.

      ...and the car's electronics, if you're in a car.

      ...and probably someone's pacemaker.

      Not a good idea.

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    3. Re:All I want... by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 2

      So I can reach into my pocket and push a button, and every cell phone within 10 meters stops working for 30 seconds

      Yeah, and with that much power radiated from your pocket you should grow that third ball real fast.

      Satisfying indeed. ;)

  9. Don't block, mute. by scotfl · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The best solution to the problem (that I've seen) is a beacon that sets all cellphones in range to silent (vibrate) mode.

    The first place I saw the idea was AskTog, May, 2000. But he has an update saying the technology has been developed by a company called bluelinx.

    --
    "In my values, freedom is more important than 'serving users' in a mere practical sense." -- RMS
  10. Re:What about emergencies? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    Yup, why, in the days before mobiles, people would DIE!

    Oh, wait, no they wouldn't, somebody would locomote the fifty feet to the nearest landline.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  11. Works for me by Seehund · · Score: 4, Funny

    For cinemas, concerts et c. I prefer a low-tech solution like this.

    --
    Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  12. Even Better: by mlknowle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have an even lower-tech solution:

    "Sir: Please turn your cell phone off or leave the cinema" - the usher

    or:

    "Turn that damn thing OFF!" - me

    I remember reading a story of about a man talking on a cell phone on a ski gondola at a resort in Aspen. Another man, sitting next to him, asked him quietly how much the phone (a new, state of the art model) had cost. When the first man replied "Four hundred dollars," the second snatched it, threw it out the window of the gondola, and calmly handed him four Ben Franklins.

    1. Re:Even Better: by rmohr02 · · Score: 2
      I remember reading a story of about a man talking on a cell phone on a ski gondola at a resort in Aspen. Another man, sitting next to him, asked him quietly how much the phone (a new, state of the art model) had cost. When the first man replied "Four hundred dollars," the second snatched it, threw it out the window of the gondola, and calmly handed him four Ben Franklins.
      That's just rude--it's causing no more annoyance than if the person was talking to someone in person, just that only half the conversation can be eavesdropped on. Now, in a movie theater, you don't even have to give them a, uhh, refund.
  13. Active Jamming... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems to me that active jamming would be much easier than having to repanel the entire room in this stuff. I think the real use could be for shielding RF sensitive equipment, acting like a low cost Faraday cage.

    Of course having magnetic wall around your sensitive equipment might not be a good idea either.

  14. Re:HELL NO! - Comment to Commenters by SkyLeach · · Score: 2

    Give me a break people. Many of you are saying your so good that you don't have to be on call all the time.

    I wasn't on call last night, but I still had to answer the page because the problem fell into my lap by default.

    Our security guy made changes to the firewall which altered the routing table without fully understanding what he was doing. (Don't get me started on this, I keep telling my boss that this guy can have as many degrees as a thermomiter in securty but still should be given user access to my firewall, much less root! :/).

    One commit on his config changes and my whole datacenter went down. Thanks to a quick check by me I told them to fix their own problem and went back to sleep. If they want to have a n00b in a position to kill the datacenters then it's not my problem.

    But this is the real world and I had to PROVE it wasn't my problem or my butt would've been fried.

    Wake up people, no data center is perfect and the sysadmin is ALWAYS responsible, reguardless of who's on call.

    --
    My $0.02 will always be worth more than your â0.02, so :-p
  15. Won't happen in the US. by surfcow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Japan has one lawyer for every 10,000 people. The US has one lawyer for every 300 people.

    "I didn't see the sign saying the theater was blocked and I missed my big interview / wife in labor / server going down / mother dying / stockmarket crashing / etc."

    US lawyers would have a field day. "Was the sign displayed properly? What font was it in? Was it also written in Swahili? What about the literacy impared?"

    I just can't see it.

    =brian

    1. Re:Won't happen in the US. by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Funny

      "What about the literacy impared?"

      What a great euphamism for "fucking morons"

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    2. Re:Won't happen in the US. by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2
      Japan has one lawyer for every 10,000 people. The US has one lawyer for every 300 people


      Wrong! Those figures come from using different definitions for "lawyer" when counting.


      In the US, to get that number, they count everyone who basically has gone to law school and passed the bar exam and is practicing law. Prosecutors, defenders, tax lawyers, patent lawyers, real estate lawyers...all of them.


      The Japanese number comes from counting only one or two of those (the ones who prosecute and defend criminal cases, I believe).

    3. Re:Won't happen in the US. by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Someone will, of course, argue that "well, the phone in the picture didn't look like mine, so I thought I'd be okay..."

      *sigh*... "justice" we call it

  16. How about lower tech? by RainbowSix · · Score: 2

    A sign at the door reminding people to turn it off?

    I know the theaters I go to don't have them. I'm sure a lot of it is people forgetting to turn them off (happens at school during classes too)

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  17. CC and CC by fm6 · · Score: 2
    The solution is so much simplier. Tell the jerk next to you in the theater to get a phone with a vibrate mode and to actually use it, and to have some repect for those around him. Turn off your own phone in the theater. In general, use common sense and common courtesy.
    If these are "common", how come nobody has them?
  18. Re:What about emergencies? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "Oh, wait, no they wouldn't, somebody would locomote the fifty feet to the nearest landline."

    ...and since payphones have a monopoly inside a theater, they'd have to pull out $1.50 in quarters. It's similar to banning outside drinks from a theater.

    If a theater jams cell phone signals, I'm going to stop going to it. They need to take extremist action. We're not little kids.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  19. HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but like most of the /. posters I keep my cell phone on vibrate ALL THE TIME. I'm not going to be rude and talk in the theater, but I HAVE TO GET MY TEXT MESSAGES.

    If you can't be without your cell phone long enough to see a movie, then wait until the movie shows up at Blockbuster, rent it, and watch it at home. I do not buy movie tickets so that I can listen to your cell phone doing the vibrate/buzz thing. Neither do I want to see your glaring backlit display while you read your text messages. I don't want you tripping over my feet or my girlfriend's while you stumble out of the theatre because of your oh-so-important message. Your job does not concern me in the slightest. I would sooner see you fired than have you interrupt a movie that I paid to see.

    Clue: Important people don't have to carry cell phones into movie theatres. Schmucks that work for important people are the ones on call 24/7.

    P.S. Who told you that most /. posters don't keep their cell phones on vibrate "ALL THE TIME"? I don't. I normally leave mine in the car when I go in a public place.

    1. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Are you going to have a fit of exaspiration when somebody needs to go to the bathroom during the film?

      Going to the bathroom is normal, expected, and unavoidable. That one kind of interruption is permissable does not mean that they all are.

    2. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Maybe you're more laid back than most people and don't mind waiting for services you paid for to come back up after a crash or waiting for the doctor you need to show up when the hospital can't reach him.

      No, as you surmised, I am not "laid back." That's why I expect my ISP to have multiple people who can handle problems. I don't expect there to be one lone person without whom the ISP could not function. Nor do I expect a hospital to have only one doctor that can handle an emergency. How do you think hospitals, doctors, and computer centers functioned before the invention of the cell phone and text messaging?

      Like I said before, if you can't be without your cell phone long enough to watch a movie, then rent a movie at Blockbuster and watch it at home.

    3. Re:HELL YES!!! by WinterSolstice · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      You are clearly wrong if you think hospitals have several doctors that can handle an emergency. Hospitals have only the minimum possible staff, especially in the anesthesia area.

      And yes, when they were on call in the days before pagers, they were woken with a phone call. They then ran their butt off in order to help you.

      Now, in the case of my youngest (who has RMS, which is a form of cancer), he has two cancer specialists, 6 anesthesia specialists, but only 1 urinary specialist. Why? Because there is only one pediatric urologist working with his hospital in the WHOLE DARN AREA. If I find out that you hurt my son's doctor because he's watching a movie and my son has an emergency I will personally beat you into the anal-retentive ball of slime you deserve to be .

      You have your little attitude, but you have less regard for society than people who are the lone specialist for 200 miles. I am delighted that you are so easily replaced. That way, when you die an insignificant death of ignominy, you will be immediately replaced with another drone.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    4. Re:HELL YES!!! by realdpk · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Jeez man. Why do you go to a theater at all? Why don't you take your own advice and rent the movie and watch it in your Fortress of Solitude? I hope your walls are soundproof though, just in case your neighbor has a refrigerator (they can get awfully noisy!!)

      Clue: My job is important, if for nothing else than to pay my rent and my bills.

      PS: Good for you. I keep mine in my pocket.

    5. Re:HELL YES!!! by Xerithane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Breath man, I see your point and you are definitely correct. fmaxwell has a point, and it is somewhat valid. My guess is that if you only have one pediatric urologist in your area it's a fairly low populous area. Hell, I grew up in an area of about 20K-30K people and we had 2.

      Living in a large city, there is always the back up. I know a few doctors and specialists who are on call. When they are on call they make sure that they don't do anything that would be interruptive. It's called courtesy. The problem is most of the young drones and lackeys of corporate culture think their servers are more important than those around them. They think because they're the ones that get called they're important. They aren't, but let them live that way -- when they grow up they'll realize otherwise. I'd say most doctors and actual important people don't like to be interruptive or make a scene at all. That's why you rarely see one scamper out of a movie theater.

      Just my $0.02. But, you are right, and I'd help with the anal-retentive beating :)

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    6. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yes, when they were on call in the days before pagers, they were woken with a phone call.

      So they were not sitting in a movie theatre while they were on call? I didn't think so.

      I will personally beat you into the anal-retentive ball of slime you deserve to be .

      I'm sorry that your son has RMS, but that gives you no right to threaten me. Besides, unless you are a LOT bigger and stronger than average, you are damned lucky that you said that while hiding behind your CRT. Here's a hint for you: Ever been mistaken for an NFL football player? I was -- by a member of the Raiders.

      I am delighted that you are so easily replaced.

      I'm not easily replaced. But neither am I so vain as to think that the entire company I work for would grind to a halt if I was unavailable by phone for a few hours. They recognize that they are lucky to have me and, while I'm sure that they would like to me to carry a cell phone so that they could reach me 24/7, they don't want to risk losing me by suggesting something that preposterous.

      Going out to see a movie is a luxury -- and one that many people have not had in years. If you have taken the kind of job where you have to be on call 24/7, then you can watch videos at home rather than annoying people in theaters.

      This reminds me of the parents that have infants that they insist on bringing into movie theaters and nice restaurants. When you make choices in your life, whether to be a new parent or a system administrator, you need to adjust your lifestyle accordingly and not act like the world owes you something.

    7. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      That's the point: you can expect it , so go to the bathroom before entering the theatre.

      If you cant hold if for two hours, go see your doctor instead of the movie.


      Being the sensitive guy I am, I make allowances for older people, pregnant women, and people with medical conditions.

    8. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And therefore, these people should not get to watch movies.

      That's why Blockbuster exists. If your presence is likely to be an annoyance to others, whether because you have a chronic cough or you because you have to be on call 24/7, rent a movie and watch it at home.

    9. Re:HELL YES!!! by alexburke · · Score: 2

      (who has RMS, which is a form of cancer)

      That's GNU/Cancer, as far as RMS is concerned.

      Now, as far as RMS himself being a form of cancer, I'm sure Bill agrees with you...

    10. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Um you might want to take a moment off being an ass

      bite me.

      For one thing, nobody is going to hear the vibrate with the music sound going,

      And all movies are loud and have music all of the time, right?

      at least in every "stadium seating" theater I've been in you can't see everyone's lap in front of you...just their head.

      The typical problem is for the persons seated in the same row as the cell phone user.

      If your idea of a really great movie is the latest installment of Friday the 13th, then, no, I guess a buzzing cell phone next to you won't distract from the experience too much. But if you are watching a top-shelf movie like Lord of the Rings or Dr. Zhivago, then it is damned distracting and annoying. It detracts from the whole experience.

      Many nights out at the movies are ruined because of hoardes of self-centered people that think their interruption of someone else's experience is somehow justified. You have the network geek that believes that keeping www.doggychewtoys.com on the web justifies his use of a backlit Blackberry pager during the movie. You have mom & dad who left the kids with some 12 year that has instructions to call them the for an "emergency" (like when she can't find the TV remote). You've got the guy who brings his PDA into the movie so that he can jot down his incredibly important, insightful thoughts (like "maybe we should call the new software 'Quantaria'"). Of course there are always people who set their watch to chime (actually "beep") on the hour so that they won't lose track of the time. And each of them thinks that they are justified in bothering others because they have their electronic gizmo for an "important reason."

      If you have to have something that can make noise or light up while you are watching a movie, then you should be renting the movie on DVD or VHS and watching it at home.

    11. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      I assume you think important means people with lots of education making lots of money.

      I am important. That's why I don't "sit in a cube 8 hours a day toiling away at the keyboard." (You're not very good at guessing, are you?) I run my own consulting business. And I leave my cell phone in my car when I go into a public place. Why? Because I'm not a self-centered ass that thinks that everyone around me should have to listen to my phone, hear me discussing business, or watch me responding to text messages.

      By the way, your description of successful business people sounds awfully familiar. Were you the person who sent me the spam about how I could be my own boss?

    12. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      I think the guy I responded to is a complete ass. He threatened me (not that I'm particularly scared), insulted me, and called me names. But I still think that making jokes about his kid's form of cancer is over the line. How about agreeing that it's off limits?

    13. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Why do you go to a theater at all?

      I usually don't. Between cell phones, watches beeping on the hour, pagers going off, babies crying (like an infant needs to be in a PG-13 movie), etc., I usually wait for it to come out on video.

      Clue: My job is important, if for nothing else than to pay my rent and my bills.

      But that does not mean that your job is, or should be, important to those sitting around you in a movie theater. And if it is not important to them, then it should not be interrupting or distracting them while they try to enjoy a movie.

    14. Re:HELL YES!!! by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      Amen. If you REALLY REALLY REALLY need to see a movie and your job requires you to be on call, take a day of vacation. Take a sick day. Take a family emergency day. Who cares. It is simply not our responsibility that you have to be on call. Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to both be on call and watch a movie at the same time. Be an adult and make a choice.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    15. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Go fuck yourself you stupid little man-child.

      If I am immersed in a movie, the last thing I want is to be jolted out of it by your wristwatch beeping just because you are too fucking stupid to turn it off.

      How is it "self-centered" to not want to listen to every idiot's beeping watch during a movie? Like it's such a big hardship to you to not have it beep on the hour.

    16. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      It hardly seems reasonable that medical personnel on call should be banned from public places because they may be needed at the hospital.

      We are talking solely about theaters, so let's not imply something more than that.

      If you choose to be a doctor, you can watch movies at home when you are on call so as not to disturb those around you. And you can join a practice where there is an answering service to screen calls and other doctors who take turns being on call.

      Besides, if someone can't wait for the doctor to check his/her messages after the movie ends, that person needs to be in the ER, not on the phone.

    17. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      So you leave your phone in the car because you're too stupid to figure out how to set it to vibrate?

      No, I leave my phone in my car for two reasons:

      1. So as not to disturb those around me with my conversations, text messages, the backlit display, and the buzzing associated with vibrating phones.

      2. Because I have a cell phone for my convenience, not so that I can be on a 24/7 leash for anyone who wishes to reach me.

      Quit your trolling.

    18. Re:HELL YES!!! by alexburke · · Score: 2

      I'm not at all making fun of his kid's cancer. I was putting some levity into the RMS-cancer linkup that only the Slashdot crowd would appreciate. That is all. You shouldn't read further into it than that, because nothing further was intended or implied. Batteries not included.

    19. Re:HELL YES!!! by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      Didn't anyone ever tell you NEVER to use absolute words? I can stand him just fine. I have no problem with a young baby in a kiddie movie or two-and-a-half star restaurant. Take the child to a PG-13 movie it can't understand, or a fancy restaurant worth quite a bit to me, and you bet I'll make my displeasure known. The parents may have a right to take the baby where it can wail it's head off. I too have the same right, though I don't wail. It's more of a holler.

    20. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      i hope you mean in a dark and crowded theater.

      I did. Sorry for not making that more clear.

    21. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      You are surely speaking from the mouth of someone who has never had to work oncall.

      I am currently working at a company that builds satellites. During the testing and launch prep phases, I am often on call. When I am on call, I don't go out to movies and, instead, rent videos to watch at home.

      Here is a suggestion, if YOU sit in your house, and rent movies from Blockbuster, you will not be interuppted.

      That reminds me of the smokers that used to say 'If you don't want to breathe my cigarette smoke, then stay home and don't eat at a restaurant'.

      Why ask anything from others that you would not be willing to do yourself?

      I don't, as you can see above. But why should I be caged up at home when I'm not on call? So that people less considerate than I am can feel free to take cell phones, pagers, and Blackberrys to movies? I don't think so.

    22. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      I was putting some levity into the RMS-cancer linkup that only the Slashdot crowd would appreciate.

      Well, he's part of the Slashdot crowd and I bet he has trouble seeing humor in anything involving his kid's cancer. I'm sure that you meant no offense and I certainly didn't mean to come down on you personally. I just thought it best to leave that line of humor alone. Peace.

    23. Re:HELL YES!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      I thought you said important people don't have to be on-call?

      No, I said that they don't have to be on call 24/7. I am sometimes on call for a few days at a time every 2-3 months (on average). That's not exactly 24/7. And I am asked if I am willing to be on call -- not told that I will be.

      Next time, read what you are quoting before pressing [Submit].

    24. Re:HELL YES!!! by realdpk · · Score: 2

      And it doesn't distract them any more than someone using the restroom, which you've already said is acceptable. So, problem solved.

      Now about this nasty cell phone blocking...

  20. Correction on parent post... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    " They need to take extremist action. We're not little kids. "

    I mean to say " They don't need to take extremist action..."

    Sorry, the submit and preview buttons are too close together. Heh.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  21. Well, that's one way to do it... by Hizonner · · Score: 2
    ... but not the only way.

    I used to have a job where I was on call 24x7, for some reasonably critical stuff. There'd usually be a call a day; some days more, some days none. Late-night calls were less common, partly because the group of people who took the calls was distributed around the planet. However, there were calls at 3 AM now and then.

    Why did I accept that? Because there was a quid pro quo. As long as I kept myself available for those calls, and as long as I got a certain amount of total work done on some other things, my employer asked NO QUESTIONS about where I was. I could go anywhere, any time. I didn't even have to be in any specific town.

    Well, OK, I did have meetings once or twice a week (on no fixed schedule), but that was about it. If I was in my office, it was because I wanted to be there at that time.

    No, I wasn't the only person who could handle the calls. You need backup, always, because there's always a chance that something will keep you from taking a call. If we'd had fixed shifts, we'd have had to have at least two people chained to desks all the time, covering each other. That's six people total, instead of three people with each taking point for her own time zone and the other two backing her up.

    By the way, I never, once permitted my phone to ring audibly in a movie theater. That's what vibrate mode is for. Sit near a door, and you can quietly and unobtrusively get outside in plenty of time to take the call.

    The arrangement had plenty of problems, many of them caused by my own failure to hire enough people to keep up with expanding load. On the whole, though, it worked. I can see the appeal of having "my time" and "their time", but I also know the appeal of being able to go home and prune my roses if I feel like it.

  22. [OT] Re:Sounds great for the movies... by Sancho · · Score: 2

    Actually, except for digitally projected movies (which I simply don't know about) "rewinding" a movie simply isn't possible. To rewind would take approximately an hour. Most theaters these days splice all the reels of a film onto a single, continuous reel that is just replayed constantly. Rewinding isn't an option, most places, because it is very time consuming.

  23. Hell on the Fire Dept. too! by isdnip · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So let's say one of these theatres with RF-shielded walls caught fire. The firefighters rush in, with their VHF two-way radios. But they are now blocked! So if they have to radio warnings, like, "Get out of there, the roof is about to collaps!", they don't hear it, because the wood part of the walls may be on fire, but they are still standing, ferrite intact.

    Firefighters died in the World Trade Center *because* the building's construction (the shell had steel vertical beams very close together) blocked the signals from the command on the ground, telling them to evacuate. (This was written up in IEEE Spectrum, I think in April.) Now you want theatres to have this problem, just because some jerks are too tacky to put there phones on "vibrate" or go to the lobby when they get a call?

    I'm a parent, and as somebody else noted, we sometimes need to be reached on an emergency basis. I have had to leave a movie because my cell phone *vibrated* and the babysitter told me, while I was standing in the lobby, that there was a problem. I would be hard-pressed to patronize a theater that didn't allow me that luxury.

    Back in the sixties, my father was a physician who was often "on call" during his few hours of not actually working. He had an answering service that he checked in with all the time. I think he had occasion to leave them the phone number of the theatre (reserved seat stage, not movie), and his seat, so that an usher could fetch him. We don't do that nowadays; we expect radio waves to do the job. It can be done with minimum annoyance to fellow theatergoers. Blocking is a bad idea.

    1. Re:Hell on the Fire Dept. too! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      I doubt it would significantly cut the UHF and VHF radio signals that the emergency services's radios use. You'd design it to really only be effective at microwave frequencies. Even lowband mobile phones are 900MHz, which is a damn sight easier to block than the 460MHz or so that ES handhelds use.

  24. Will help my dating life... by svferris · · Score: 5, Funny

    This will really help my dating life. I always notice my date's cellphone rings in the middle of the date and then she "suddenly" has to go.

    But now their phones won't be able to ring... :-)

  25. What about those with children and babysitters? by pm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My wife and I always go to the movies (and dinner dates, and theaters, and concerts) with our cellphone set to vibrate simply so that if things go horribly wrong at home with the baby sitter and our children, we can be reached. Just because my wife and I are having a date out doesn't mean that everyone back at home (children and/or babysitter) need to have a miserable evening.

    Only once did the babysitter call during the theater. I got up, walked out, and took the call and told the babysitter that my daughter's teddy bear was probably under the couch (it was) and waited until they found it. Without a cell phone our daughter who was two and half would have been miserable. And there's no reason when we are a mere cellphone call away to help.

    Honestly, if they blocked our cellphone we wouldn't go there. We'd find something else to do on our rare dates and wait until it came out on video. I'm sensitive to the noise issue during public performances, and I would no more take a call during a movie than I would talk loudly to my wife during the same movie. But we need the phone if only to have the peace of mind that everything is ok at home.

  26. Or by BitHive · · Score: 5, Funny

    Theaters should just implement a spotlight system a-la the Movementarians' indoctrination video in The Simpsons. As soon as you pick up your phone, the movie stops, and you are nailed by a high-power spotlight until you hang up. This should serve as a nice deterrent. For added fun, intercept their signal and play their call over the sound system for everyone to hear. Hell, I'd pay extra for a seat if theaters around here did that!

    1. Re:Or by Cato · · Score: 2

      Great idea about the spotlight! This reminds me, I was once on a training course where the instructor had a great way of dealing with people who took mobile phone calls during sessions: he said "We'll wait for you" while they took the call. Only happened once due to the embarrassment of keeping your peers waiting...

    2. Re:Or by Gordonjcp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Several of my friends work in theatre ("real" theatre, not cinema). One night someone's mobile went off in the stalls. Well, you know how far round you can swing a follow-spot? That was one very, very short phone call...

  27. Re:What about emergencies? by mark-t · · Score: 2
    ..and since payphones have a monopoly inside a theater, they'd have to pull out $1.50 in quarters. It's similar to banning outside drinks from a theater.

    You're joking, right? 911 is a free call from any phone, anywhere in North America. And the theatres don't own the phone lines, they rent them from the phone company, who I think, would have some words to say to the theatre if they started charging for emergency 911 calls.

  28. Technological breakthrough, not by isomeme · · Score: 2
    So this guy gets headlines (and /. coverage) for determining that RF doesn't get through sheets of conductive material very well? You know, I think there's a bit of prior art on this. I used to work in a TEMPEST-rated lab; I watched a guard's walkie-talkie cut off in mid sentence as he walked in, and that was with the door still swinging shut behind him.

    Similarly, sheets or mesh screens of conductive material are routinely used to block unwanted RF interference generated by devices like computers and televisions which would otherwise create a great deal of "leakage".

    So I ask again: What's new here? Why is this guy getting attention? I think any electrical engineer could figure out how to wrap a Faraday cage around a theater; the question is whether theater owners want to do it.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  29. It's really just metal in disguise by billstewart · · Score: 2

    The active part here is the metal, not the wood, which is just for decoration. Maybe you young folks don't remember "panelling" from the 70s, but if this technology takes off here, it won't be some clean natural-looking Japanese aesthetics, it'll be cheap-plastic-looking fake wood. Might as well stick to straight metal.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  30. Hardly new by sparkz · · Score: 3, Funny
    As anybody who's tried to make a phone call in a metal-framed building will tell you.

    Very good idea, IMHO.

    Vibrating phones are no better if you're still going to answer the bloody thing and start talking into it.

    If you're on-call, part of that deal is that you've not just got the phone with you, but are capable of answering in. In a cinema, you are not capable of answering it - if you're sitting next to me, you'll be LARTed and unable to speak at all!

    --
    Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
  31. Making cell phones work worse inside by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Cellphones already work badly inside many buildings, so people who need pagers and cellphones for life-threatening emergencies don't just have problems in electrically-shielded theaters, they have problems in lots of buildings with too much metal. Pagers put up with this kind of restriction better than cell phones; people who have cellphones work around the problem by stepping outside and YELLING A LOT SO THE OTHER PEOPLE CAN HEAR THEM, AND SHIELDING THAT MAKES MORE PEOPLE YELL MORE OFTEN IS JUST A BAD IDEA....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  32. Re:What about emergencies? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    I've gone to 4 different movies in the last couple of months, I heard a phone ring once. Didn't bother anybody.

    Boy that theater better start cell-proofing the theaters right away!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  33. Re:What about emergencies? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    Okay, if my objections are so stupid, tell me how they can justify jamming the signals totally. C'mon smart ass. "Oh phones ring in theaters" isnt a good answer. People talk in theaters. People cough in theaters. Babies cry in theaters. Watches beep. People get up to go to the bathroom.

    Amazingly though, theaters don't put gags in people's mouthes, they don't do health checks when you enter, they don't ban babies, they don't make you remove your watch, and they don't lock the doors when the movie starts.

    So please tell me how jamming the cell phone signal is even remotely acceptable?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  34. Faraday Cage, nothing new. by pagercam2 · · Score: 2

    Faraday, Michael (1791-1867)

    Invented the concept of a metal box sheilding radio waves (Faraday Cage). All these guys did was add paneling (a 1960's technology, found in many basement family rooms). So what exactly in new 1867+1960=???

    1. Re:Faraday Cage, nothing new. by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      Acutally, I remember setting up a test on some spaceflight hardware a few years back. There were several of us in the EMI/RFI test area, and one of the women looked a bit agitated as the afternoon wore on. About 4 o'clock, she commented that she was suppose to get paged when her bf got into town, and that should have been three hours ago. Somebody started to snigger, and she got this "I'm just as stupid as stupic can be" look on her face, looked around at the huge faraday cage which insulated the enitire room, and then started to laugh as she went to find a phone.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Faraday Cage, nothing new. by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

      do the math... that is year 3827 technology!

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
  35. Re:There already are wireless firewalls... by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
    All it does is throw white noise on the cell phone carrier frequencies out of a directional antenna to cover a specific area. It's got to be cheaper than repanneling the entire facility. Sure you get a recurring power cost, but a small low power radio transmitter dosen't use that much power to begin with.
    Active jamming will 'leak' outside the theater, interfere with users on public streets, which violates FCC (and likely the Japanese equivalant) regulations.

    Passive signal attenuation does not.

  36. Re:What about emergencies? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    Heh, I know who you are. ;)

    "Those of us who are responsible enough and have common courtesy might be punished for it."

    Yep, and worse, once it's acceptable in theaters, it'll be acceptable in other places too. First they'll do theaters. Then they'll move on to Libraries, afterall you must be quiet tehre. Soon you won't be able to use it in the mall. The mall will figure out that they can easily and legally jam the signals, and suddenly payphone usage will increase.

    Yet, this is all acceptable when it means you can go to the theater and not hear an occasional phone beep.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  37. Other uses by steveha · · Score: 2

    This sounds great, but I want it to protect me from the orbital mind-control lasers. It's such a hassle wrapping the tinfoil around my head, especially when I forget to leave my eyes uncovered.

    This might also help when the Goldeneye satellite blasts EMP everywhere. At least my computer will still work so I can play Quake, Unreal Tournament, and Barbie's Fashion Designer after all the banks collapse.

    Will it also work against telepathy and remote viewing? Got to call Art Bell and ask.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  38. Re:Not worth the risk by Random+Feature · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And as many others have pointed out - LEAVE A NUMBER where you can be reached.

    Guess what - that's what millions of people do today and what most of us GREW UP WITH. And we're still here.

    If you are that concerned about your child's safety/health/well-being or you don't trust your babysitter then STAY HOME or take the child with you - IF the kid has manners.

    &lt side rant &gt
    If the kid doesn't have manners, both of you stay home. I'm so tired of ill-mannered, disgusting, rude children in public I could slap them and their parents silly. It's as bad as cell phones, only worse because it propagates.

    I'm not a child hater - I have 3 and they are always complimented on their manners. Not because they're perfect but because most people's children are so horrifying.

    &lt /side rant &gt

    --
    I don't have a solution, but I certainly admire the problem.
  39. Re:What about emergencies? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "Even cell phones without a service package have to let you make a 911 call. No dice on your argument. "

    My girlfriend has a condition where she gets migraines so powerful they can prevent her from walking. I don't call 911 when she has an attack like that, I'd have to call her specialist to find out what to do.

    That's why you can't generalize on that type of thing. It's incredibly silly that a theater would even consider this.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  40. Two things : by karb · · Score: 2
    First of all, the using the wireless phone inside the theatre to _call_ the theatre about noisy people is the coolest way to have them removed without missing parts of the movie.

    Secondly, I believe there are FCC regs or _something_ that prohibit jammers. I just remember reading/hearing somebody from the U.S. govt. say that in an interview. It also kind of makes sense ... jammers are being deployed all over the world, but not in the states.

    --

    Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone

  41. Re:What about emergencies? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "Just as Jesus was crucified to pay for the sins of all mankind, you and I, and other responsible cell phone users will have our phones forcibly shut off to pay for the sins of those who talk on the phone during a movie."

    Amen.

    I wonder how much trouble I'd get into if I alluded to the RIAA's attempt to force CD's to only play in CD players. You'd think some people would be sympathetic by saying "Well, the RIAA has the right to stop MP3 trading because it hurts legitimate sales." Instead, what people say is "Hold on, not everybody who puts a CD into a computer is doing anything illegal. There's no reason to use extremist measures to stop that."

    Yet, when it comes to cell phone jamming, people are all for it: "Uh yah, jam the phones cos I think it'll improve my moviegoing experience."

    Instead of saying: "Whoah, hold up, don't take extremist measures to block my phone. The vast majority of cell phones in theaters are off or don't ring at all."

    Fun, eh?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  42. Doctors? by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a cell fone blocking system could be potentially life threatening, some doctors are allways on call, but does that mean they shouldn't enjoy a night out, if their cell fone is blocked and its an emergency a patient of theirs could die, this is why at a theatre if someones fone or pager goes off i ask them if their a doctor, if not i chuck ice at them for the rest of the show

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  43. Shocking lack of knowldge on /. by Punchinello · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm shocked that with all of these posts no /. readers have pointed out that use of such communication jamming devices isn't kosher with the old FCC. Any US theater trying to use this will find the feds knocking at their door... and that is a shame.

    --

    Remember... ZG9uJ3QgZm9yZ2V0IHRvIGRyaW5rIHlvdXIgb3ZhbHRpbmU=

  44. Re:What about emergencies? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    They don't need to justify it. It's private property, and you do not have the right to send and recieve radio transmissions at will.

    Or do you also think you should be allowed to keep your phone on in hospitals, on airplanes, and other places?

    Cell phones are pretty convenient, and useful, but they're not an inalienable right. And if you have a medical condition that means you cannot be out of contact, then it's your responsibility to not be out of contact, not random public buildings to make sure you're in contact. Or do you also think that underground parking lots, say, should install cell phone boosters?

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  45. Attenuation by sigwinch · · Score: 2

    The article quotes 97% attenuation, which is 15dB, which is little enough that there's no point in doing it.

    --

    --
    Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

  46. Something missing from the story by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

    This story would have you believe that you need this ferrite material to make a microwave shield. But that is nonsense. Any sort of screen will greatly attenuate the signal also. In fact, stucco houses (populare in SW US) use "chicken wire" as the base for the material to cling to.

    So... why would they be pushing this ferromagnetic material for shielding? Doesn't make sense.

    Most likely, this is a typical example of journalism misreporting a technical story. OR, it is a con man trying to make people buy an expensive solution for a simple problem.

    --

    The only good weather is bad weather.

  47. Automatic Voluntary Silence Zone Transmitters by cosyne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What i'd like to see, and haven't seen mentioned yet, is a standard for cell phones to switch to vibrate/standby/whatever upon recieving a 'silence beacon' signal. The phone would just have a 3rd setting: ring, silent, or auto. If it comes in range of a silence beacon, it switches to silent. When it goes out of range, it can switch back to ring. It's voluntary, so if you're expecting life or death communications you can leave it on ring, but people are still free to take you phone and throw it. This, along with a ringer schedule to switch to vibrate during meetings and classes, should help a lot if people are willing to use them.

    1. Re:Automatic Voluntary Silence Zone Transmitters by cosyne · · Score: 2

      Do you really think this will stop people?

      It would stop me. I don't try to be an asshole (usually), i'm just forgetful. I tend to switch to silent when i go to a movie/lecture whatever, leave it on silent until i miss a call, switch it back to ring until it inturrupts someone, switch to silent. rinse repeat.

  48. Re:What about emergencies? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "Get your yuppie ass off our website! "

    Nope! You'll have to interrupt my internet connection with wood. That's obviously the only way to solve your problem. :)

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  49. s/nauseous/nauseated by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 2

    D'oh...

  50. What about silent-mode? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    The point of napster is to trade legal files for which you have gotten permission of the copyright holder... But the point of cell phones in movie theatres is to disturb the person next to you by not using vibrate mode?

    The idiocy of slashdotters amazes me.

  51. New Verizon commercial by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Can you hear me now?"

    (silence)

    "Damn!"

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  52. Re:What about emergencies? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
    Tell that to a pregnant woman, a man in a wheelchair, or an eldery person with a weak heart.

    I would, aye. If they are at risk of dying with thirty seconds warning, then they'd best make sure they're within thirty seconds of communication.

    Cellphones are not a guarenteed communication method, unlike landlines, which do have uptime guarentees. So don't treat cellphones as such. They're a convenience, but there are times and places they should be off, period. A place where silence is expected, and an admission fee is charged, is such a place. If you can't trust your babysitter to be alone with your kids for two hours, you shouldn't go to the movies. Yes, it sucks, but it's part and parcel of having children. And yes, I have young children. I also have a good home theater setup, and a depressing collection of Disney movies. :-)

    If your gf was raped in an underground parking lot, wouldn't you wish they did have phone boosters

    No, because she's not exactly going to be able to make a call in the middle of being assaulted.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  53. Whiny tech slaves by deblau · · Score: 2
    I'm sick and tired of the volume of technical hypocrisy on /., and this article is just the latest example. Most of the rants go something like "I'm a doctor or a tech, I NEED to get my pages and phone calls". Well, Poindexter, let's play a little Socratic logic game:
    1. I need to get my pages
    2. I can no longer get pages at the movies; therefore
    3. I may no longer go to the movies (or, by extension, anywhere else I can't get pages)
    Notice the use of the word "may". That's right, you can still go to the movies, but your job doesn't permit you to any more.

    What's usually added to the 'argument', and what pisses me off, is:

    • I'm a whiny bitch who thinks I have a God-given right to play with my toys, any time, anywhere
    You made a life decision to be in that career, you signed the contract, now SUCK IT UP. It's your fault for getting yourself involved in something that you can't deal with. Lawsuits based on the "whiny bitch" premise will get thrown out. Entertainment is NOT a right you possess. It's a priviledge that you now may no longer enjoy. If the movie theatres want to throw away doctor and tech business, that's their choice. They're private businesses, they are not required to cater to you.

    I personally think that the theatres are well within their rights to do this. They're trying to provide a service, they make money based on people's experience of that service. I don't like that they're considering it, I would much rather have all the 'whiny bitches' exhibit a little self-restraint, but I've already resigned myself to the fact that hoping for this to spontaneously occur is a lost cause. Look for movie theatres to plaster this stuff up at the earliest possible moment.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  54. Re:HELL YES!!! (-1 redundant) by red_crayon · · Score: 2

    I will probably be modded down for "redundant", but I'd just like to say, I wish there were a (Score: 6) for posts like this. Kudos to you.

    To the OP: dude, like fmaxwell said, it's not our problem that your servers are down. Feel important on your own time.

    --
    "Never bullshit a bullshitter" All That Jazz
  55. Re:How about parents of small children? by CamelTrader · · Score: 2

    You will get a small fraction of polite people that simply forgot to turn their device to silent. All the other polite people will have already turned theirs off.

    Then theres the small fraction of people who REALLY need to leave their device on. They, like the polite ones, have already taken care of this.

    This leaves the jerks. They will whine/bitch/lie and won't turn their phone off.

    Result? Same as it is now, without spending the money on the detectors.

    --
    Your .sig is important to us. Please hold.
  56. Re:OT: Relative Importance of People by red_crayon · · Score: 2

    I'd like you to see what happens when all the 'peons' go on strike.

    In the tech industry? ... Surely you jest!

    Tech has the weakest unions of any major industry and the worst track record of organization and job actions.

    P.S. Nice troll.

    Back atcha.

    --
    "Never bullshit a bullshitter" All That Jazz
  57. Computer cases and other shielding uses by B.D.Mills · · Score: 2

    This technology has far more use than merely making phones not work in theatres, especially if the panels are cheap, reasonably light and can be cut to size with standard power tools.

    If it was adapted for computer cases, then you would cut most of the electromagnetic interference originating from your case. It won't stop the interference from the cables, but there are other ways of shielding cables. Cable conduits could be made out of this stuff.

    Aircraft could cover the interior of the cabins with this stuff, to keep the avionics from playing up because of someone's Gameboy.

    --

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
  58. Huh? by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    "The magnetic ferrite absorbs much of the energy of the radio signal, cutting the phone dead in most cases."

    This is a passive jamming scheme that the FCC has no juristiction on. It's not the FCC's job to regulate how RF permeable your offices wall is any more it is to regulate the theaters. If it were broadcasting an active jamming signal, then I could see the FCC getting their shorts in a bind, but this? Nah. It does what any wall does- absorbs RF energy, only more so. No worries for an idea who's time has come. A notice to the effect of "This is a cell/pager dampening zone. Your devices will not work past this point" should do the trick nicely.

    Now if they could only have guaranteed child free theaters...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  59. Can't we all just...... Nah. by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    If you're that worried something is about to go wrong, what are you doing watching a movie? Like another poster said, millions of people survive without a cellphone implanted into the side of their face.

    As far as going to another theater for your coverage, I'm don't think you'll hear too many complaints. The same with people who like to tote their kids to the movies, only to have them yell and cry at certain scenes. Sorry, but people don't pay $8.50 a ticket to hear your cell phone ring "Do-Mi-So" while you fumble around to answer it or listen to little Tommy bawl his head off because the parent didn't have the discretion NOT to bring him.

    You have the right to be connected at the hip to your child just like you have the right to choose a non-interference theater. Excercise it. Please. We're begging you.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  60. Re:conspiracy by Skevin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Aluminum won't block enough signal.

    Personally, I find Aluminum more than adequate for stopping annoying cell phones, if you apply a little ingenuity. Here's how:

    You should start with a long aluminum rod, preferably 20 grain, weighing in between 7-15 pounds. I recommend a piece between 37 and 45 inches long and 2-3 inches in diameter.

    Shopping tip: while you can obtain such a bar from any conventional hardware store, one of my faithful readers, T. Harding, maintains you may purchase such economy hardware at a Big 5 or Play It Again Sports. For our purposes, she recommends the following brand names: Easton, Demarini, or Louisville Slugger.

    Bring this item with you the next time you go to a movie. When one of your fellow theater patrons' cell phone rings and he acquires the unmitigated audacity to answer it, do as follows:

    1. Move in front of him with your aluminum rod.

    2. Stand very close to him.

    3. Quietly wave your toy over his phone.

    Voila! His phone call will die out without warning! It happens so suddenly, neither party has a chance to even say goodbye! It works nine times out of ten*.

    * One time out of ten, you require a liberal, repeated application of your aluminum against that subject's patella, in a downwards motion towards the bottom of the femur. Once the device is on the ground, firm (and direct) impact from your aluminum will terminate its functionality.

    Solomon

    "I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!"

    --
    "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
  61. Re:How about parents of small children? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2

    Geez. What the hell did people do before cell phones? That's right. They enjoyed their lives just the same. If Billy's mom can't part with her phone for an hour and a half, she shouldn't be going to the movies in the first place.

  62. Yeah, hell. by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    Firefighters died in the World Trade Center *because* the building's construction (the shell had steel vertical beams very close together) blocked the signals from the command on the ground, telling them to evacuate.

    What do you suppose those steel vertical beams were used for? Take a guess. Go on. You're right! Just to block fire fighters RF transmissions! Bad, bad, bad analogy, Tex. They couldn't have been used to hold the building up or anything, right? Sorry, but not every structure hundreds of feet high with the ability to withstand minor quakes can be conveniently cell accessable. I would expect firefighters to realize that there is ALWAYS the potential for such risks because of the buildings structual makeup. Using your logic, we shouldn't build buildings hundreds of feet high because they have the potential to collapse and really give somebody an ouchy.

    As for being a parent, millions of people actually- get this -survive on a regular basis without a cell permanently imbedded in their face. Some of them are even parents! Go figure. As for you father, something tells me an usher wasn't half as intrusive as your cell playing the Hawaii 5-0 theme. I'd like to think everybody had the forsight to set their phones to vibrate and answer the phone outside the theater, but they don't. You expecting a life or death call? Maybe you shouldn't be watching a movie in the first place. Flame all you want, could care less.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Yeah, hell. by isdnip · · Score: 2

      We're obviously dealing with a reading comprehension problem here. I didn't say that the beams were built in order to block RF, but that was a side effect which proved unfortunate in an emergency.

      And btw, movie theatres don't usually have assigned seats and ushers to lead you to them.

      As other have noted, ferrite would block all public safety frequencies; it's not selective to cell phones. And there are public safety frequencies in the 700-900 MHz spectrum, near cellular.

  63. Re:Not worth the risk by Triv · · Score: 2

    I'm so tired of ill-mannered, disgusting, rude children in public I could slap them and their parents silly. It's as bad as cell phones, only worse because it propagates.

    Dude, I empathise, but seeing them on the street's nothing. I used to work in a toy store. Actually, it was the mother of all toy Stores - FAO Schwarz on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan. On Christmas Eve.

    Picture this - hundreds of parents with hundreds of kids. None of the adults giving a rat's ass what their children're up to - they're throwing things, tripping each other, running around. Half of these parents are on cells, the other half are foreign (usually German) tourists with little to no English comprehension. They're all in a rush, they're all stressed out, and they're all extremely loud.

    And what did I get to do to these people? I had to smile and be nice to them. My mouth muscles still haven't returned to their normal shape. I firmly believe that it wasn't the kids' fault - I liked most of the kids, or at least I could see how in different circumstances I might've liked them. I despised the parents for not watching their children, for thinking the store was a public place, and for treating us like babysitters and yelling at us when little timmy whacked his sister over the head with a large stuffed gopher.

    I work in a library now. Much better class of people. :)

    Triv

  64. Wouldn't this demagnetize... by jea6 · · Score: 2

    ...the magnetic stripe card in my wallet?

    --

    sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
  65. Too late by jquirke · · Score: 2

    This technology might have been useful a few years ago, but in the last couple years I haven't heard any phones go off in the cinema (which I do frequent).

    It seems everyone (including myself) knows the drill of switching their phone into a silent profile - or if they can't figure that out they turn it off.

    And the problem has been solved - without losing any contact with the GSM network (so phones can still register missed calls /SMSes/etc).

    I don't know what the situation is like in the US - obviously it's still a problem I gather based on the posts I have seen - but educating people - friendly reminders etc, does seem to work

    1. Re:Too late by jquirke · · Score: 2

      No, I live in Melbourne, Australia, where people generally are considerate.

  66. Re:What about emergencies? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    I'd respond, but not in a public forum. Suffice it to say that I'm not being flippant or heartless.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  67. That's a bunch of bull... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    He made it clear that it is on VIBRATE, not RING.

    Therefor you don't have to listen to it and in fact CANNOT HEAR IT!

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:That's a bunch of bull... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      If you leave it against a hard surface, yes. But if it's in your pocket it can't be heard.

      I sometimes have trouble hearing my cell phone RINGING in my pocket, let alone buzzing. (ofc, I can feel it.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  68. Not really... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are other ways to block signals.

    Metal works pretty well. :)

    Or if you need to see through it, there are some forms of glass that have trace amounts of a conductive substance that will give it a mild tint to visible light but make it impassable for RF. Also fine-mesh screen works too.

    I'm not sure exactly what they use in the windows, but because the company I work at makes RF power amplifiers, mainly ones for cell phone use, the building is heavily shielded to keep signals INSIDE. (Not for security, but to prevent us from interfering with nearby cellular systems, but security would be an additional benefit if we ran 802.11b) - We do make sure to use dummy loads, but even dummy loads aren't perfect. I've been working with some FM broadcast-band equipment - I'm sure it radiates somewhat, but I can walk out to my car (50 feet away from the lab), turn on my radio, and hear pure static with no sign of a carrier anywhere nearby.

    This just happens to be a form of RF shielding for places where they can't afford to shield the room totally with metal/can't design such shielding in as an afterthought.

    Conductive paint (perhaps containing graphite, or maybe powdered ferrite) would work well too.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  69. This is some serious stopping power... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Multiple layers of ferrite will block ANYTHING... Not just gigahertz signals.

    Most materials (wood, etc.) have RF blocking power that is dependent on the frequency.

    Sandwiched ferrite and pure conductors, on the other hand, are a different story.

    You might be able to get around the problem with a passive reradiator coupled with a low-pass filter. (Will leak certain signals very well - Something similar to the Radiax used to give cell coverage in subways.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:This is some serious stopping power... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      A passive reradiator would certainly work. I think for cost reasons, though, they'd use the thinnest possible layer of ferrite, which would have less of an effect on lower frequencies.

    2. Re:This is some serious stopping power... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      Still, a thin layer of ferrite is pretty close to being a simple sheet of metal - Even aluminum foil will kill VHF.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  70. Even lawyers are not that stupid. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2

    Since when each piece of private property needs to gurrantee you can make your living by hindering the costumers that make possible that the landlord makes a living?

    If anything, cinemas, theatres and any other public fora like those should be suing the hell out of those unconsiderate enough to take those instruments of hell in public places. Such anoyance surely must be puting off possible cinemagoers.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  71. Re:HELL YES!!! is not insightful at all by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

    So everyone on call should just give up their social lives, eh?

    No, just movies in theaters.

    (ok, so you don't *have* to go to the movies, but I can imagine the reactions of my friends if I refused every time they wanted to go)

    If your friends can't understand a desire to not annoy others, you need new friends.

    Please stop staring at my crotch and watch the screen instead.

    If you weren't running a glaring backlit mobile phone to draw attention to your crotch, it would be a lot easier for those around you to watch the film.

    What makes you think you'll hear my phone doing the vibrate/buzz-thing?

    Because it makes noise and I have heard them in meetings, theaters, offices, and restaurants.

    You'd be right if it weren't for the fact that anyone voluntarily leaving a movie they've paid for probably has such a damn good reason it would override your momentary discomfort.

    It's not up to you to decide whether you should inconvenience and discomfort me. Your hypothetical data center? Couldn't care less. Your company can hire multiple people to rotate the "on-call" responsibilities. Then you can go to movies when you're not on call.

    Or perhaps you'd also object to sysadmins running through crowds because a vital datacenter's gone down?

    And I suppose you think it's fine if some idiot sysadmin running through a crowd runs into a pregnant woman, small child, handicapped, or elderly person while rushing to get www.petfoodmart.com back online?

    If you choose to treat your mobile phone as if it weren't mobile, why did you get one?

    Obviously, your car is on cinder blocks in your front yard, but rest assured that my car is perfectly mobile.

  72. Re:HELL YES!!! QWZX by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

    Personally, I'm concentrating on the movie, and just tune little things like that out. If your concentration ability is that bad, you might want to consider medication.

    I did not say that I can't follow a movie when that happens. But when you are immersed in a movie, something like that can quickly snap you back from the illusion of being there. Obviously, that's not a big issue if you are watching something like Men In Black II, but when you are watching a cinematic masterpiece, it's a different matter.

    And it's the sum total of annoyances. One watch? Minor annoyance. 4 watches, 8 cell phones, 9 backlit pagers, 2 PDAs, a Blackberry, some infant wailing away, and a guy two seats down that sounds like he has tuberculosis and the movie is ruined.

  73. Re:doctors and such? by DanThe1Man · · Score: 2

    What the hell did all these essential people do for entertainment ten years ago?

    They got real expensive cellphones/pages.

    30 years ago they had to stay home by the phone.

    100 years ago they had a guy on a horse come or they stayed at the hosipital.