i do really have exact ideas about the n1 architecture, battery technology, and the native flash environment implementation, and the implied extra layer necessary to do the interpreting.
i also really have many exact ideas about the implementation of applications in flash not being optimal relative to latency, cpu usage, and battery life, compared with a native app capable of recreating any interface flash is capable of. why let the developer shoot themselves in the foot just because they think different about shooting themselves?
there is the one way about it when backward compatibility is achieved through the application of emulation and virtualization... but that would make you the fucking idiot.
you're an anonymous coward. ur mum's face is no other way about it.
save for theoretical quantum encryption, there is always the potential for a MITM attack. ALWAYS.
using a 3rd party is only effective as it is an order of magnitude more difficult to middle both connections simultaneously... theoretically if you could do that, you either have access to sniff the whole internet or the 3rd party's local network or the local networks of both ends... if you already have that level of access, it's already game over. do you trust the tumbler lock on your front door, or do you nail boards over the door and barricade it with a boulder every night?
i have a legal freeware program that sniffs wireless networks to analyze them for quality of service. this will include pieces of unencrypted IP packet data. google recently used similar tools and accidentally obtained sensitive data.
add on top of SSL pre-defined challenge questions, and a message or image defined by the user and presented by the service and you've got the same level of protection as a valid SSL certificate. combining them helps even more, but there are still attack vectors.
You miss the point of this entirely. Prohibition of blasphemy is a rule you set up for the members of *your* faith only, not for others. Trying to impose your rules over people who have not signed up for your religion has to be called on.
and that works fine until your "sheep" start asking why "God" only applies to an arbitrary land border.
if you truly believe "God" is real, it is hypocritical to not assume his word applies everywhere.
so you're calling them on it... when they have nuclear weapons... to the end of what? fighting a nuclear war over someone asking you not to provide to their countrymen images of a "God" you wouldn't even know to defame if they didn't define him to you? defaming their "God", if anything, is no more than an acknowledgment of your fear of that "God"... otherwise, what is the point? because you can? they CAN detonate nuclear bombs, and they're more likely to do so the more you exercise your rights to provoke them.
ok... yes, i suppose you did, lady. are all women as smart as you?
no woman in my family presents herself as a man, because no woman in my family is a nutcase, and only a nutcase woman would present herself as a man named "tom".
you are pathetic. hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca
the whole show was about them doing the show... my mic is loud, mine is soft, i sound bad, lets get cameras, seriously my mic is bad, i have a website, i have a website, i miss doing the screen savers, me too, me too... HATED it.
wasn't it the constitution that said "seperation of church and state"?
if there is no evolution, there is a god.
the fact that there is a god implies church.
the state should spend no money on anything that implies faith, or that faith implies.
the creationist stickers make perfect sense.
how would the same parents feel if their childs textbook stated "there is no god, we evolved from apes"... wouldn't they like to be warned with a "antichrist" sticker?
Slashdot Mirror
Starting Score: 1 point
Moderation 0
50% Flamebait
50% Funny
Extra 'Flamebait' Modifier +6 (Edit)
Karma-Bonus Modifier +1 (Edit)
Total Score: 5
slashdot = stagnated
what would you call the act of dispersal of a fart in a room? how about the dispersal of lipophilic compounds in oil?
ur mum's face is a shovel, idiot.
you are NOTHING
i do really have exact ideas about the n1 architecture, battery technology, and the native flash environment implementation, and the implied extra layer necessary to do the interpreting.
i also really have many exact ideas about the implementation of applications in flash not being optimal relative to latency, cpu usage, and battery life, compared with a native app capable of recreating any interface flash is capable of. why let the developer shoot themselves in the foot just because they think different about shooting themselves?
maybe you should have one of those ideas.
you are NOTHING.
there is the one way about it when backward compatibility is achieved through the application of emulation and virtualization... but that would make you the fucking idiot.
you're an anonymous coward. ur mum's face is no other way about it.
you are NOTHING
Why reinvent the wheel?
yeah, why reinvent web search when altavista and webcrawler dominate the market?
the implication that someone might expect or hope that flash would go away, thus requiring the claimed reasons why it would not.
i'd rather if the article author and slashdot editors would go away.
save for theoretical quantum encryption, there is always the potential for a MITM attack. ALWAYS.
using a 3rd party is only effective as it is an order of magnitude more difficult to middle both connections simultaneously... theoretically if you could do that, you either have access to sniff the whole internet or the 3rd party's local network or the local networks of both ends... if you already have that level of access, it's already game over. do you trust the tumbler lock on your front door, or do you nail boards over the door and barricade it with a boulder every night?
i have a legal freeware program that sniffs wireless networks to analyze them for quality of service. this will include pieces of unencrypted IP packet data. google recently used similar tools and accidentally obtained sensitive data.
add on top of SSL pre-defined challenge questions, and a message or image defined by the user and presented by the service and you've got the same level of protection as a valid SSL certificate. combining them helps even more, but there are still attack vectors.
You miss the point of this entirely. Prohibition of blasphemy is a rule you set up for the members of *your* faith only, not for others. Trying to impose your rules over people who have not signed up for your religion has to be called on.
and that works fine until your "sheep" start asking why "God" only applies to an arbitrary land border.
if you truly believe "God" is real, it is hypocritical to not assume his word applies everywhere.
so you're calling them on it... when they have nuclear weapons... to the end of what? fighting a nuclear war over someone asking you not to provide to their countrymen images of a "God" you wouldn't even know to defame if they didn't define him to you? defaming their "God", if anything, is no more than an acknowledgment of your fear of that "God"... otherwise, what is the point? because you can? they CAN detonate nuclear bombs, and they're more likely to do so the more you exercise your rights to provoke them.
I waste time compiling the email list
ok... yes, i suppose you did, lady. are all women as smart as you?
no woman in my family presents herself as a man, because no woman in my family is a nutcase, and only a nutcase woman would present herself as a man named "tom".
you are pathetic. hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca, hudson@videotron.ca
Google already told me how to optimize my PHP...
my password for slashdot is "lasertag123"...
find solace in taking down his server, you will.
it's also used in karma whoring clarifications
the whole show was about them doing the show... my mic is loud, mine is soft, i sound bad, lets get cameras, seriously my mic is bad, i have a website, i have a website, i miss doing the screen savers, me too, me too ... HATED it.
http://fraudtech.bizland.com/short_change.htm
there is the scam.
huh? i'm sure they mean without affecting ANY DATA on the local hard disk... surely this distro USES (and thus affects) the local hard disk.
you said it yourself... it's the holy grail...
you do know the holy grail doesn't exist, right?
didn't anyone realize that absurdity and trival nature is exactlly what the author was trying to say?
half of you monkeys probably already started on a perl script to solve 2x2 chess.
i'm more creeped out by those white rectangles that steal your soul while you're jumping on trampolines.
if that's what it takes to turn out great games, so be it.
burnout 2 is pretty much the only xbox game i play... time to upgrade it seems.
i did this to my TI-85 when i was in high school... that was like 1995 or so.
ZSHELL FOREVER!
Jeff Bezos to make X-Prize recipients his bitches
wasn't it the constitution that said "seperation of church and state"?
if there is no evolution, there is a god.
the fact that there is a god implies church.
the state should spend no money on anything that implies faith, or that faith implies.
the creationist stickers make perfect sense.
how would the same parents feel if their childs textbook stated "there is no god, we evolved from apes"... wouldn't they like to be warned with a "antichrist" sticker?
i hate everyone.
best. idea. ever.
if everyone used this, and the software was perfect, everyone would own a car within 1 block of their house and probably pay 1/10th as much.
CANT SOMEONE GET EVERYONE BEHIND THIS?!
man slaughter 2 at most.