Slashdot Mirror


You Look Like You Need a Guinness

prestidigital writes "This is a great fictional advertisement (high bandwidth) for Guinness. I say "fictional" because it is from the movie Minority Report. You may recall that Steven Spielberg is known for heavy branding in movies ala the opening scenes from Back to the Future (Burger King and Pepsi plastered all over). Well, apparently he has taken it a step further by weaving it into the very fabric of the plot in Minority Report. Cool ads if you can afford to wait for them. Lexus is good."

77 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. Personal Ads? by OutRigged · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about anyone else.. But personally, I'd hate having an advertisement call me by name. Or advertisements that scan my eyes, and track me.

    How about walking into a store, and having a big ad greet you? I don't think so.

    Anyone agree?

    --
    RaGe
    We're all just noise on the wires..
    1. Re:Personal Ads? by Eythian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone agree?

      As with many things, its a trade off. On one hand, with the sort of thing in the movie, they know what you get last time and could help you find something similar. Many people would find this sort of thing convenient (provided it wasn't too annoying like, say, a paperclip could be). However, speaking for myself, the privacy aspect would be worrying. It removes the voluntary part of submitting information. Kind of like the online newpaper registration systems, only so ubiquitous that it would be impossible to avoid.

    2. Re:Personal Ads? by lostchicken · · Score: 2

      Spielburg was paid very well for these placements.

      The movie cost $100mil, $25mil was earned through product placement.

      This sort of thing is not new, though. 2001 had many product placements, i.e. Pan Am spacecraft, Westinghouse, etc.

      I feel it kinds adds to the movie. It gives it more of a connection with the world we live in.

      --
      -twb
    3. Re:Personal Ads? by zephc · · Score: 2

      Totally agree.

      "Hello, Mr. So-and-so, back for more gay porn? We have a new gang-bang video you may be interested in"

      Never go to the video store with your wife and kids if thats the case.

      </humor>

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    4. Re:Personal Ads? by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      How about walking into a store, and having a big ad greet you? I don't think so.

      Honestly, it depends if that ad comes with a discount on something I want to buy. If so, I don't mind at all. It's just like when you go to Amazon, and it says, hello, this is what we recommend for you, and this is what we're running on special offer today.

      Otherwise I am reminded of that episode of Star Trek where Troi's mother takes Worf's son to a health spa. Worf and Troi go looking for them, but there is a sort of flying drone that gets in their way, it will only let people into the spa who are happy. Worf reaches up with one hand and crushes it.

  2. Manipulating the mindless masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If advertising is really about 'informing' the public to make 'rational' decisions, then why do advertises need to:

    1) Employ psychologists who don't have an ounce of ethics in them
    2) Have music in their adverts
    3) Advertise over and over again when we all already know about their product
    4) Spend double-digit percentages of their company's money on advertising
    5) Have little in the way of actual information in their adverts, and instead just try and sell an image

    The reality is, people are ignorant and highly controllable. Society is a socio-economic machine; there is no rationality nor any real understanding of how it works. Each individual mindlessly functions in relation to the little corner which they face on a day to day basis, and will decieve themselves into accepting and doing whatever they're tricked or pushed into thinking will make them personally more secure.

    "Microsoft". Need I say more.

    1. Re:Manipulating the mindless masses by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

      If advertising is really about 'informing' the public to make 'rational' decisions

      Wow, who ever told you that? If any marketroid ever told you that with a straight face, rest assured he bust out laughing the instant you were gone.

      Seriously, though, you don't get any points for tearing down an argument that no-one made.

    2. Re:Manipulating the mindless masses by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah ha, we have yet another master-of-the-BLINDINGLY-obvious AC. Yes, Sherlock, ads are about pimping a particular product and NOT about providing true and accurate information to the public. What tipped you off?

      Look up advertising in the dictionary some time: "to call public attention to especially by emphasizing desirable qualities so as to arouse a desire to buy or patronize". Hell, even ad agencies don't pretend like they are trying to spread the truth or inform the public. They know what they are doing: selling products.

      As to the rest of your rant, take a psychology class or three.

      It amazes me that this sort of thing gets modded up.

    3. Re:Manipulating the mindless masses by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Much of Microsofts success lies in the fact that when all other was focusing their advertising towards the techies Microsoft went to the PHB's. Since the PHB's know sh*t about computers they are much easier to trick. Brainwashing works best to implant ideas and urges when the recipient is not aware of the product or service.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    4. Re:Manipulating the mindless masses by rabidcow · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not that I'm trying to disagree, but most of those are pretty flimsy points.

      1) Employ psychologists who don't have an ounce of ethics in them

      Potentially libel. It may be true, but I don't see any evidence and it's not a widely known fact.

      2) Have music in their adverts

      So they aren't totally boring? And why do they have music in movies?

      3) Advertise over and over again when we all already know about their product

      Just because *YOU* know about their product doesn't mean that everyone does. Besides, it's NEW! and IMPROVED! now.

      4) Spend double-digit percentages of their company's money on advertising

      Probably because advertising is expensive. Or do you think they wouldn't advertise for free if they could?

      "Microsoft". Need I say more.

      Yes. WTH is that supposed to mean? All companies are working for Microsoft? Ok, Microsoft is a good example of what you're saying, but what about, say Disnep? McDonalds? Pepsi? Presidencial campaigns?

    5. Re:Manipulating the mindless masses by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      More money company has = more money they received in revenue because they had a quality(?) product

      Bzzzt. How about

      More money company has = more money they received because more people have seen their adverts than the competitions'.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    6. Re:Manipulating the mindless masses by joshuac · · Score: 2, Funny

      ---snip
      Seriously, though, you don't get any points for tearing down an argument that no-one made.
      ---snip

      actually, it looks like he got 5...

    7. Re:Manipulating the mindless masses by cpeterso · · Score: 2


      PHBs are also the ones who sign the checks.

    8. Re:Manipulating the mindless masses by Kredal · · Score: 2

      "Moo"

      I suddenly want a Gateway computer!

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    9. Re:Manipulating the mindless masses by Ziviyr · · Score: 2

      "Moo"

      I suddenly want a Gateway computer!


      I feel sorry for ya, I don't like Gateway because they sell prebuilt systems and due to some of their history. Oh, and expandibility/maintenance doesn't seem high on their list either.

      A cow in a box is one thing I might think when I see their commercials. Now if they could put a chocolate milk tap on the side of their systems they'd have something (which I bet would be mostly used for beer in this netborhood).

      I recall chiming "It real ly sucks" to the Pentium dinks at the end of some of those commercials.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  3. Ahh! by miffo.swe · · Score: 3, Funny
    The best beer in the world. Really beats american beer, thats to much like making love in a canoe.

    (Fucking close to water)

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Ahh! by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      It is kind of sad- nice animation, but Guinness sells itself.

      It's also kind of sad- nice old joke, but there are so damn many good breweries around here it's like Christmas every time I go to the grocery store. Even if the other half of what they carry is just cans of rice.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    2. Re:Ahh! by waytoomuchcoffee · · Score: 2

      Times have changed in the States. If you are in San Francisco, ask one of the zillion slashdotters here to bring you to a real bar/pub sometime.

    3. Re:Ahh! by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2

      guiness isnt beer - it's stout.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    4. Re:Ahh! by waytoomuchcoffee · · Score: 2

      Stout is just a subset of beer. Stout just means "strong".

    5. Re:Ahh! by laserjet · · Score: 2

      stout is a type of beer, as is ale, porter, extra stout, bitter, special bitter, etc. it all falls under the beer umbrella.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    6. Re:Ahh! by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 2

      BoVLB wrote:
      >Since moving to the US, I've learnt to be very
      >careful where I order Guinness, as it is usually
      >mistreated in some way. For example, if they can
      >pour it in under a minute, it will definitely
      >taste like crap. Of course, nothing tastes as
      >good as Guinness in Dublin; good stout doesn't
      >seem to travel well.

      Well, you're probably right about the way that Guiness is served. I may take a trip to Ireland some day soon and I'll be sure to try it served Irish style. I just keep getting these retching retrospects from trying Guiness the last time - it frothing up in my mouth and exuding thru my nose despite my best attempts.

      >By the way, when you tried Haggis (as I assume
      >you did in order to form your opinion), what did
      >you find objectionable about the taste? How would
      >you describe it?

      I have to fess up, I've never tried Haggis. I've been affected by everyone else's opinion I guess. Anyway, I will try it. (After all, my grandmother was Irish.)

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    7. Re:Ahh! by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2

      well consider me educated.

      i'd somehow formed the impression that beer was a specific type of brewed alcoholic beverage. eg, the Belgians and Germans had laws regarding what was 'bier'. perhaps the english meaning of beer doesnt have these connotations.

      anyway.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    8. Re:Ahh! by waytoomuchcoffee · · Score: 2

      The German beer purity law only allowed for water, hops, barley, and yeast. Stout uses a more roasted barley, giving it a darker color.

      Btw, the purity laws are no longer in effect, at least legally, because the violate EC trade laws. Many brewers still follow them though, legal or not.

    9. Re:Ahh! by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2

      indeed, which is why stout is not beer. :)

      least that was my way of thinking. anyway.. give me a guinness anyday. (the smell round St. James Gate in dublin is lovely.)

      --paulj

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  4. stuff to come by Ankou · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You can already see that this kind of advertising is soon to come. Ya get hundreds of email spam with your name on it and you get tons of phone calls a day congradulating YOU for being accepted for a new low rate card. How many of you agree that if not the eyes being scanned, there is at least this huge war for the eye balls at every website you go to. Remember those obnoxious flash adds, flashing adds, adds that run all over the page you are trying to read, and not to mention the ones with audio. I think there is a line that consumers are going to put up with. We have been pounded and proded by product placement in every single medium we use, and there is a point where you start to loose customers who get pissed off with this invasion of sanity. Hopefully people will speak up before the ads in this movie become a reality otherwise I am going to start wearing mirror sunglasses.

    1. Re:stuff to come by Ziviyr · · Score: 2

      We have been pounded and proded by product placement in every single medium we use, and there is a point where you start to loose customers who get pissed off with this invasion of sanity.

      I've been boycotting heavy advertisers for a while now. No purple pills for me! Not even while driving around a mountain in an SUV or quilting toilet paper!

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  5. Highly futuristic version by Qrlx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well I tried to watch the ad. It was there on my desktop. It starts off with a Guinness and some birds flying around in the top or something. Then, the screen goes all digitized and the soundtrack sounds like a modem trying to connect. Then, Windows tells me that QuickTime has caused a fatal error and must close.

    All this because Mozilla is still downloading the file while I tried to watch it. Maybe I need to un-cap my cable modem. Or turn off Kazaa. Or just take all the pr0n out of my Kazaa folder, that seems to be over half of the traffic.

    I wish I were drinking a Guinness right now, but Fat Tire Amber ain't too bad.'

    Whoo Hoo! I got the Score +1 Bonus check box!

    1. Re:Highly futuristic version by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      Oh. I didn't know there was sound to it. I'm not going to download any plugins today, though.

      And as great as Guinness is, I prefer Murphy's.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    2. Re:Highly futuristic version by laserjet · · Score: 2

      I have made brews where people can not tell the differnce between my brew and Guinness. Guinness is actually pretty easy to make, cosisting of mostly roasted and flaked barley.

      of course it helps to have a nitrogen system at home. :)

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    3. Re:Highly futuristic version by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      Beamish just ain't Murphy's. The bar my LUG meets at just switched. I've never seen Samuel Smith's. Samuel Adams, however, has a wonderful Cream Stout. Where does Smith's sell? pyite- I don't care if it's Irish or not. Barley and hops recognize no borders.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
  6. Man, that's slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've had 3 Guinesses this morning in the same time it took that clip to load. And that that includes settle time. ;->

  7. Not Spielberg... by Richard5mith · · Score: 3, Informative

    Except of course that Back to the Future was co-written and directed by Robert Zemeckis and it was just Spielberg's production company (Amblin).

  8. Hey, that add worked! by Rhinobird · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't want just ANY Lexus now...I want the one in the movie. How about commenting on the cross promotion prevelant. In this month's Popular science is an article about that Lexus that Mr. Anderton drives around in. How about commenting on that: advertising disguised as news?

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    1. Re:Hey, that add worked! by Ioldanach · · Score: 2
      How about commenting on the cross promotion prevelant. In this month's Popular science is an article about that Lexus that Mr. Anderton drives around in. How about commenting on that: advertising disguised as news?

      Popular Science is news? I don't often read it, but I've looked at articles in there going back to the 60's (my grandfather got it back then and saved all of them, there's a cool article about ramjets in one of the really old ones). I've never seen Popular Science as anything more than a fluff magazine with product placement. Its a pretty cool magazine, and does a good job with what it has, as long as it placed some decent products in that issue.

  9. Oh, so horribly worng... by tlambert · · Score: 5, Funny

    Going into the store with you significant other...

    "Ah! Joe Johansen! Good to see you again! We just received a new batch of KY in butterscotch, your favorite flavor, according the Basking Robbins!

    We know you normally buy KY down at Big Al's Porn Shoppe on 32nd, but this store is 4 blocks closer to your home, and we know how awkward it is to get those 50 gallon drums home on the public slideway! Why not have one of our friendly clerks help you out to your car with one of the store's hand-trucks? Remember, we provide free curb service, where Big Al's doesn't!

    How is Millie, your Yak, by the way? Has the infection she had responded to the Penicillin you purchased two weeks ago from Bob's Veterinary Supply? Is she still down in U-Store-It Storage Unit #15? We have a co-marketing agreement with U-Store-It, where if you buy from us today, you will get 5% off your next month's rent!

    ..."

    [and on and on...]

    Uh, no thank you!

  10. hells bells by savbill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what the fuck - lexus sucks dogs farts. beemers are the only way to spend serious money. fuck commercials, fuck adverts, fuck capitalism, eat the rich, fuck their children, die, die, die!

  11. Who cares by nemesisj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I personally LIKE it when a movie set in our time period and our world uses branding on its set. Which one is more believable "Mom, I'm going down to the drugstore to buy a Super-Duper-Cola" or "Mom, I'm going down to the drugstore to buy a Coke"? Using fake brands in movies breaks my suspension of disbelief and annoys me. Same goes for video games.

  12. Er, what's wrong with this picture: by Nailer · · Score: 2

    Reebok. An ad shows clothing that changes color as runners exert themselves more vigorously. Consumers can program their clothing with the latest fashions by downloading directly from Nike.

  13. Philip K. Dick to the Meta by localroger · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The ads targeted by retinal scans appeared in several PKD stories (though not, notably, The Minority Report itself). This movie is the best PKD adaptation ever; the things which were added to flesh it out to movie length are almost all taken from other PKD works.

    If PKD were still alive he would be laughing his ass off at the product placements in this movie; not only are the ads portrayed as he envisioned, the moviemakers actually used the techniques being portrayed to help pay for the movie portraying them.

    On second viewing I also have to say that the "not too futuristic future" is more different from ours than it first appears. Every flat surface in the movie's public space is a monitor showing ads. Even the cereal box! (That was soooo Philip K. Dick.) While The Gap might not be around in 2050, you can rest assured some other business serving the same niche will be; and it and the fashions within will be as unremarkable to the people of 2050 as the Gap and its product are to us in 2002.

    And you have to really wonder whether the rest of the movie after Anderton is haloed is just a fantasy (a la Total Recall) or if it really happened...

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:Philip K. Dick to the Meta by blamanj · · Score: 2

      This movie is the best PKD adaptation ever

      By this, I hope you mean "contains as much PKD-derived content as any previous movie," because as a film, it's horrible.

      OK, I'll admit a certain visual aesthetic, but so much of it was crap that I hardly know where to begin. It's a summer movie, so we can forgive a few pointless chase scenes. But all of those "odd" characters seemed like 4 or thth rate ripoff attempts of David Lynch.

      The creepy plant lady made no plot contribution (and knew things she wouldn't have been able to know) and was purely there to show off visual effects.

      The spiders weren't even scary, they were almost cute, in a repulsively ET-like way. The precog, who supposedly can't predict anything less than a murder is telling him when to hide behind a balloon sale...

      And how about that happy ending? Boy, didn't you walk out of the theatre smiling knowing we'd done "the right thing."

      Actually, it wouldn't be nearly so annoying if the movie weren't chock full of really good ideas that were totally wasted. What a travesty.

  14. When Ads Attack by mgrochmal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    When I saw Minority Report recently, I remember John Anderton being bombarded by ads. Another series came to mind when I was reading it: Futurama. Specifically, the episode where it starts with the gang going online with VR goggles and, just as they see the pretty digital effects, they're swarmed by lifesize pop-up ads. They have to literally fight their way through, punching and kicking the OK buttons.

    They weren't high-resolution holograms with customized messages, but it still had the feeling of being smothered by commercials that I felt in Minority Report. I enjoyed the actual plot of the movie, but the deja vu of overactive commercials gave me a laugh.

    --
    This .sig Intentionally Left Blank.
  15. Logo placement and PKD movies by theRhinoceros · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a reputed Blade Runner Curse, referring to a number of brands given prominent display in Blade Runner which fell victim to hard financial times during the 80's, with the exception of Coca-Cola. Brands such as Atari and Pan Am, which were featured quite prominently in ads on the sides of buildings lost a tremendous amount business, to the point of collapse (although I was shocked last week to see the Atari brand on my NWN box). It wouldn't surprise me, then, to see a number of companies shown in Minority Report to collapse before 2054, even currently viable corporate behemoths. I would like to think that their inclusion in a speculative illustration of dystopian coporate intrusion would be the "real reason" they collapsed, and that PKD somehow had a part in it, laughing at the irony of it all.

    1. Re:Logo placement and PKD movies by zephc · · Score: 2

      there is a great Kids In The Hall sketch (#2, episode 218) that deals with superstition and failed businesses, and how such superstitions are really stupid. They blamed the failure of a previous company on the chain letter, not of their crappy product (some kinda crappy flavored gum).

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  16. I don't know about you... by Sc00ter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    But I like the ads in the film for one reason. It makes the film more realistic. I'd much rather see them Burger King then a Bobs Burger Wold, or drinking a Pepsi rather then a pepsi can with the word Pepsi removed and Soda put in it's place.

    1. Re:I don't know about you... by evilviper · · Score: 2

      I'd agree with you if it's something subtle...

      If you watch the movie Cobra, you'll see Stallone, in the middle of a gunfight, stop, drink a Coors beer, then get back to fighting.

      Director's are torn between making the movie good (thus making the ads subtle), and making their ads good (taking away from the movie), which is the reason I am wholly against product placement.

      Additionally, why the hell are so damn many people happy to pay $8.50 to watch a movie, just to be inundated with commercials before, and durring the movie you paid to see?

      Sorry, too many money-grubbers for my taste. I'll stick with Gnutella for my movies, unless I'm sure there aren't going to be any ads...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:I don't know about you... by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 2
      Additionally, why the hell are so damn many people happy to pay $8.50 to watch a movie, just to be inundated with commercials before, and durring the movie you paid to see?
      You're forgetting the forced donations before the movie starts - I'm all in favor of helping little kids with cancer, but if the movie theaters really cared they'd donate some of the $3 I have to spend for a bag of M&M's. Seriously, they charge such enormously high prices for food/drinks at the theater, don't let you bring in your own food, and then they guilt you into giving them more money. I now don't go into the theater until five minutes after the "start" time.
      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  17. Why do they pay for it? by ProfessorPuke · · Score: 2
    I understand that although the use of real brands adds to the credibility of the film, these companies still paid for product placement, even though they were portrayed really negatively. I thought the invasivness and uquiquity of the "real world popup ads" was scary (especially on the subway train), and wouldn't expect real marketers to be associated with pushy, overaggressive tactics.

    Of course, there's no such thing as bad publicity. And the hero was usually blandly accepting of the adverts, providing a role model for the consumer masses to follow. The only time a commercial really angered him- when he threw an overly loud cereal box across the room- the brand name was blatantly fake.

  18. my impression by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 3, Informative

    When I saw this movie, the large amount of blatant product placements was sickening.

    There were others not mentioned in the article...

    Nokia had a huge spot, with their logo placed on every electronic device for an entire scene.

    Burger king is also a whore, with their logo being well within plain view during a mall scene.

    The first ad to catch my eye, was Aquafina. I guess they're still packaging aquafina water in 2054 with the same package design and logo.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    1. Re:my impression by Tetsu+no+Chef · · Score: 4, Funny
      The first ad to catch my eye, was Aquafina. I guess they're still packaging aquafina water in 2054 with the same package design and logo.

      Dude... that was Aquafina Classic. They're just cashing in on the nostalgia.

      :)

  19. Not really new by qweqwe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you look at:

    the DEMOLITION MAN (1993) quote:
    --------
    Lenina Huxley: [T]aco Bell was the only restaurant to survive the Franchise Wars.
    John Spartan: So?
    Lenina Huxley: So, now all restaurants are Taco Bell.
    --------

    and "E.T. the Extra Terrestrial" (1982) key scene where the film's main human character, 9-year-old Elliott, lured E.T. of the woods with Reese's Pieces

    you'll see it's been around for a while.

  20. Advertising that knows you could be bad by totallygeek · · Score: 5, Funny
    Walking into a hotel:

    Fourth wife this week, sir?


    Walking into a bookstore:

    Sorry sir, we are out of the magazine Barely Legal


    But, it might be neat to have tailored banner ads online. I mean, I never want to go hunting or fishing, so don't show me anything outdoorsy, but would like to see something regarding computer programming, but not games.

  21. Informing? by mikosullivan · · Score: 2, Informative
    Where did you get the idea that advertising is usually supposed to be rational? I've never heard anyone in the industry claim that. Advertising is generally about awareness: make the consumer aware of the product so that when the time for a possible purchase comes along the product is in the consumer's mindset. That's why there are so many car commercials. Nobody expects the commercials to actually make someone want to buy a car. Only a tiny fraction of the audience is expected to even be interested. The intent of the ads is that for that small fraction of the audience that actually is thinking about getting a car, indeed for the even tinier fraction that is thinking of getting a car in that product class, the ad puts the car into the consumers' mindsets.

    There are also other intents of advertising, including the occasional rational decision type... check on trade journal and you'll see a lot of ads with a lot of real informational content. Image is, of course, another popular objective (Pepsi comes to mind).

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  22. Or not by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    Personally, I liked the approach in "Repo Man" - they couldn't get any product placement $, so all products in the film were given generic labels: for example, "BEER".

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:Or not by MsGeek · · Score: 2

      I've said it before, and I'll say it again. "Repo Man" DOES have product placement. It's just product placement for Ralphs Supermarket's line of generic groceries. They haven't carried those generics for years but back when "Repo Man" was released they were flogging them like crazy.

      After "Repo Man" there was enough of a spike in interest in their generics that Ralphs put out a set of generic goodies like a "T-Shirt", a "Mug" and a "Cap".

      Funniest placement in the movie: the can of "Food" that Otto was eating from at his parents' house. I don't know what Emilio Estevez was forced to eat there, but it looked an awful lot like either cat food or dog food. EEW.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  23. Back to the Future? by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    Spielberg was only a producer on that movie. Zemeckis directed it.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  24. Not that damn paperclip by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 2

    "It looks like you're writing a letter! Would you like me to go to staples.com and buy you more stationary with your ever-so-special pr0n on it?"

  25. Shoudn't submitters have Karma? by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look ma! Advertisements seemlessly woven into movies! This really is News for Nerds, Stuff that matters!! Slow news day, Michael?

    Just so it isn't totally off-topic, seen the new singular wireless commercials? Shamu? MiB2 worms? I think they're opening up a new trend in cross brand commercialization... Surely I can submit that as a story and it will get accepted. Nah...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  26. They already refrain from that by mikosullivan · · Score: 2, Informative
    That was one aspect of Minority Report that I found unrealistic. Companies already refrain from publicly flaunting their knowledge of you. For example, for a short while a lot of Pizza Huts answered the phone with "Hello Mr. Smith, would you like another large thin-n-crispy with mushrooms?" They quickly found out that customers didn't like that and stopped doing it.

    That's not to say they don't have or use their knowledge of you, they've just found that people like to maintain their illusions of privacy.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  27. Next comes the adverts beamed behind the eyelids. by Dast · · Score: 2

    I can't remember what PKH short story it was in--I thought it was a story included in the Short Happy Life of the Brown Oxford--but it included a depiction of advertisements of the future, beamed behind into your eye on spaceflights so that even when you closed them, the advertisement was all you could see. If it isn't content that is nothing more than cleverly dressed adverts, it will be adverts that you are strapped down to watch.

    Destroy your television now, while you still can! It is trying to control your behaviour! BWAHAHAHAHAHA. Man, I forgot how much I liked PKD's works. Perfect reading for the fanatic, paranoid, 20-something, college-student, experimenting things they shouldn't be, slashdot demographic. Should be popular with all the wierdo's around here.

    --

    This sig is false.

  28. Re:Ads are proof of Spielberg's fear.... by dontkillme · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I seem to be in the minority (haha) here... but I like product placement in movies as was done in Minority report. I also liked the placement of Atari etc in blade runner. I think that the placement of ads as was done in Minority Report not only gives us an interesting view of the future, but gives people from our future a glimpse into our views of the future (got it?).

  29. Taco Bell in Demolition Man by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even worse, the export version of the film had a different restaurant chain, because Taco Bell is US only.

    1. Re:Taco Bell in Demolition Man by laxian · · Score: 2

      I saw a single Taco Bell in Sydney, Australia in 1999.

      --

      our written thoughts are gifts to our future selves

  30. And on Monday morning, advertisers will get busy by Animats · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We need personalized ads, like Minority Report. And we need them now. I want ads like that in our malls by next year!"

  31. Back to the Future by ceswiedler · · Score: 2

    Spielberg didn't direct Back to the Future. Roger Zemeckis did. Spielberg was executive producer, which means "person who endorses the production of the movie and has high-level input but otherwise does nothing."

  32. Re:Hey, that add [sic] worked! by droleary · · Score: 2

    How about commenting on that: advertising disguised as news?

    Are you even aware how completely self-referential you're being?

  33. Re:Free advertising? by alumshubby · · Score: 2

    And if so, shouldn't it be retroactive?

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
  34. Just watch the movie.. by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    Cool ads if you can afford to wait for them.

    Or if you can afford the $7 to see the movie..

  35. You must not access this site if ... by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2
    From their "legal requirements" page:
    You must not access this site if you are resident in any of the following countries:

    France and the French overseas territories and departments/ France et Départments ou Territoires d'outre mer français (French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Réunion, Mayotte, St Pierre and Miquelon, French Polynesia, New Caledonia, Southern and Antarctic Territories, Wallis and Futuna Islands) Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Denmark, Egypt, Ethiopia, Finland, Hungary, Iceland, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Krygystan, Kuwait, Libya, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Poland, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Sweden, Syria, Tajikistan, Togo, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Yemen.

    The Middle Eastern countries I can understand, but France? Denmark? Sweden? What's the problem there? And does anyone seriously think that residents of those countries are going to heed some stupid "thou shalt not" like this? Do authorities in European nations actually attempt to enforce whatever laws are making this notice necessary?
  36. Assisted Suicide by localroger · · Score: 2
    A few weeks ago Rotten ran a "boner" showing Microsoft Word, with the text "Dear world, I cant take it any more" and Clippy helpfully advising:

    It looks like you're writing a suicide note! Click on the method you're planning to use: [gun] [jump] [drown] [other] [etc]

    One of the funniest damn things I've seen in awhile.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  37. slashdot needs a "scary" moderation by anticypher · · Score: 3, Funny

    You may be at +5 funny, but knowing some scummy marketers in my lifetime, I'd moderate this as +5 "frighteningly close to reality".

    the AC
    Butterscotch is not my favourite flavour

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  38. Science fiction isn't meant to predict the future by ToastyKen · · Score: 2

    Science fiction has always meant to comment on the present more than predict the future. Pretty much ALL science fiction becomes dated, but that doesn't make them bad. Minority Report is VERY relevant to our world today, and that is what it's trying to be.

  39. Re:And on Monday morning, advertisers will get bus by Animats · · Score: 2
    1 year later, millions of research dollars are gone with no results.

    Maybe not. Face recognition technology is probably good enough for advertising.

  40. Minority Reports, but no Minority Focus Groups by laxian · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Luckily for the companies in the movie, they only had to advertise to one group: "White Americans" ... because aside from the Token Black Cop(tm) (one male and one female), and a few people in the crowd (a few Asians here and there and couple of other dark skinned folk).

    I found it strange that Washington D.C. of all places ... one well known for its large black population and its folks from other races would have 99% white people in it. Take a look for yourself, around the pool, in the mall, in the cars, in the jail, everywhere public ... white people.

    Go ahead and make up scenarios for yourself to explain this phenomenon.

    --

    our written thoughts are gifts to our future selves

    1. Re:Minority Reports, but no Minority Focus Groups by SiliconEntity · · Score: 2

      Don't forget, his eyeballs were Asian too.

  41. About those Reese's Pieces by Guppy · · Score: 2

    ...and "E.T. the Extra Terrestrial" (1982) key scene where the film's main human character, 9-year-old Elliott, lured E.T. of the woods with Reese's Pieces...

    According to legend, the scene was originally suppose to use M&M's. However, Mars, the candy's manufacturer, refused to allow their name to be used -- and so Hershey's Reese's Pieces ended up being featured instead. According to the link above, sales of Reese's Pieces increased something like 65-85% afterwards.

  42. Pizza Hut (Re:Taco Bell in Demolition Man) by armb · · Score: 2

    > Was it another 'real-life' chain, or a made up one?

    It was a chain owned by the same company that owns Taco Bell, I remember that much from the stories at the time (about the logos being digitally replaced). I only saw the movie on TV, and that still had "Taco Bell".

    One quick Google later: http://www.yum.com/ says Pizza Hut and Taco Bell (and KFC) are owned by the same group ("Yum! Brands", formerly Tricon Global Restaurants). Pizza Hut being in Demolition Man rings a bell. And looking a bit deeper, both Taco Bell and Pizza Hut were owned by PepsiCo, which also sounds familiar.

    http://uk.imdb.com/Trivia?0106697 confirms it. I should have looked there in the first place. In fact _you_ should have looked there in the first place :-)

    --
    rant