Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Claims IP Rights on Portions of OpenGL
An anonymous reader writes "Minutes of the latest OpenGL ARB meeting reveal that Microsoft is claiming IP over the vertex and fragment extensions, both critical for exposing the capabilities of modern graphics hardware. The minutes also include an update on the progress of OpenGL 2.0." The question is, what does this mean for Linux -- how will Microsoft exercise their "rights"?
Is it too much to ask Micro$oft to realize what they are doing... perhaps I must say.. byte my arse.. and stick totally with Linuxes.
(1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
Pretty simple,
Linux penguin please drop pants and lean over table.
Why compete when you can claim IP over key functionality? Not only can you nuke the competition but any resulting lawsuits layers your pockets with money.
-Matt
--- Need web hosting?
I find the use of the word 'believe' quite funny in the minutes (used multiple times). Microsoft probably knows damn well they don't have any IP claims, but simply throwing their weight around like this serves their purposes quite well ... the extension ain't gonna see the light of day for some time, while people there scurry around in fear of an M$ lawsuit.
And let's not forget their kind offer "They're offering to license their IP under reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms; will license rights to the extent necessary, provided a reciprocal license is granted to MS. Granted on 1:1 basis for OpenGL 1.3, 1.4, and earlier versions." !!! This to OpenGL?!?!
Typical corporate tactics these days, mores the pity.
MOD parent up!
This brings up a valid point. Currently there are many voices saying the same thing. But where is the respectable representation that can take this from and ideological fight to a corporate level.
Really, it has come time for the Linux Development Group to evolve and consolidate.
Look around at the proponent sites of open sorce and you see most are not updated. We need a confident, technically saavy, and business minded ($$$) group to go forward and address things as this where it really matters...the wallet.
If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
Screw you, you damned Victorian! MY clit will NOT be denied! ;>
____ _______
Duty now for the future!
I'm no MS apologist.
But you should read the statutes before you go about waving anti-trust law like it were real law. American anti-trust does not conform to the Rule of Law, that is, it is not objective. When you as a corporate agent, whether executive, shareholder, peon, whatever, undertake some action, you CANNOT KNOW if it will violate the Sherman act or the Clayton act, etc. These laws are deliberately written in the vaguest conceivable terms, using undefined jargon, to give the Feds the power to stomp on whoever they want and let alone who they want.
Furthermore, the acts criminalized by anti-trust law are made illegal, but they are not immoral. Anti-trust laws are on the same plane of moral illegitimacy as laws against drug use and oral sex (betcha didn't know THAT was illegal!).
"The question is, what does this mean for Linux"
Nothing, because hardly anyone uses it on the desktop. The real ramifications are not to any specific platform, per se-- but to the idea of an OPEN GRAPHICS LANGUAGE. Hence, the name: OpenGL. If anything, the Mac would have a lot more at stake if Microshaft gets their hands on the kitchen sink. Steve-o has been pushing hard at getting OpenGL out there.
"Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."