Slashdot Mirror


Ximian Evolution User Experiences?

An Anonymous Crawdad asks: "My workplace is a mixture of Windows and Linux users, but we use Exchange as our email server for the groupware features. For the Linux users this makes it necessary to have a second Windows box just for email. I'm curious as to how well the Ximian's Evolution and Connector works with the Exchange server since it has been out for a little while and reviews on the net are a little lacking. I don't think there is a "try before you buy" option. My general belief is that 1.0 releases are never worth buying, but how much hope should I have for the future?"

33 of 69 comments (clear)

  1. Fabulous. by Mordant · · Score: 2, Informative

    Works very well; calendaring supported. IMAP support is good, too. GnuPG integration works (basic, signing, verifying, no real key management); LDAP directory lookups work well, smart .sig based upon selected sending account, Palm sync works.

    It's a damned good mailer.

  2. Stability? by Jerf · · Score: 2

    I'd be interested in hearing other people's stability experiences. I'm running Gentoo and I can't keep Evolution 1.0.7 running more then 30 seconds without a crash. I can sort of use 1.0.5, but it's still fairly fragile.

    It's so unstable for me that I figure it's got to be some sort of config problem (gentoo can make things a little TOO up to date sometimes), and I'd like to hear how Evolution does on other, more conservative, distros, especially Red Hat. Can you actually use Evolution, or is it a lot of pretty pictures followed by a segfault?

    (Please specify distributions as appropriate; I think it may matter here.)

    1. Re:Stability? by Aparthy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have Evolution 1.0.7 running on my Gentoo box for about 14 hours staight each day. I've don't remember having any problems with it crashing since I updated to this version. It could be your config files. Mine were copied over from an older installation an another computer.

      Other then email, I don't really use evolutions features. They were something that I thought I would try out in the beginning, but they aren't something that's very usefull to me at this time.

      Robbie

    2. Re:Stability? by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

      Red Hat 7.3 KDE 3.0

      Hasn't crashed at all!

    3. Re:Stability? by Jerf · · Score: 2

      Interesting, thanks. AFAIK I had no previous config files but I'll try wiping the dir out. I also found the 'killev' command can be useful. I can't guarentee I tried wiping the evolution dir and killev at the same time...

      It's a pity, because I think I'd like to use Evolution as my real mail client...

    4. Re:Stability? by Papineau · · Score: 2

      No problem here also. Evolution 1.0.7 on RH 7.3 (hand-compiled based on whatever SRPM which came with 7.3 originally). Mail only, I don't use the other features. It may be the accompanying libs. What's your gal, gtkhtml and bonobo-conf versions?

      Just noticed that 1.0.8 was released yesterday, so I'll download it, compile it, try it and get back here.

      Only things I dislike in 1.0.7 is that when I try to search the messages in a folder, sometimes it skips messages which I know contain the string. And when I Alt-tab to a message window, the keyboard focus is nowhere. I have to click before being able to type something.

    5. Re:Stability? by blazerw11 · · Score: 3, Informative

      emerge evolution --emptytree

      Sure, it'll take a day and a half, but your Evolution install will likely improve. I'm having no problems on my Gentoo box with Evolution 1.0.7

      --
      A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James
    6. Re:Stability? by Papineau · · Score: 2

      First impressions (from a 30 seconds try): no change. And reading the ChangeLog confirms it: only 1-2 bugfixes went in from 1.0.7 to 1.0.8. So it looks like it'll be as stable as the previous one was for me.

  3. Which groupware features do you need? by robkill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How many people use the groupware features? Which ones do they use? If you're mainly using them as top-down push (e.g. putting a meeting on everyone's calendar, which sends them an email), why not just have the Linux clients use Exchange as an IMAP server?

    --
    DMCA - Chilling free speech since 1998.
  4. exchange versions by aakin · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a note, it only works with Exchange 2000. Check what version you are running... if you are using an older version of exchange, then it won't do you any good. We talked to them a few months ago, and they said they weren't planning on doing ports to older versions of exchange, so...

  5. My thoughts. by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Informative

    I currently use Evolution 1.0.7 in an Exchange 2000 environment but, without the connector. I user POP & SMTP to talk with Exchange. Comparing it to Outlook 2000 I would say that it is very good overall. But there are a few "rough edges".

    Speed is the first issue. Performing the various daily functions is noticably slower than with Outlook on the same machine. Opening a message or sending a message all take a moment longer than Outlook, which seems to snap right to it. The sluggishness is livable but, it is noticable too.

    The second is probably a matter of taste. I use Evolution with KDE 3 and the Evolution colors are all gray washouts. This isn't too bad at first but, it does cause the interface to lack contrast which I find tiring after a while. I haven't found a way to change the colors but, it is probably possible. Perhaps, through the GDM configuration but, that's more trouble than it's worth.

    The only other possible issue I have is with an over abundance of menu options that don't seem to offer any real value. I still haven't figured out what the difference is between "Empty Trash" and "Expunge". Are they both necessary?

    Other than that, I think Evolution is VERY comparable to Outlook. I love some of the features that it has that Outlook lacks. For instance the ability to view HTML formatted mail but not download embedded images off the net. This means no more dot clear images tracking the message and no auto-run scripts doing dirty deeds.

    VFolders, a method of storing searches in a folder view format, are very nice. I must confess though, I don't use it much. I only have 5 VFolders configured.

    Calendaring and contact management is great too, though I can't speak for Exchange interoperability with the Calendar, I feel confident based on Evolution that the connector would be good too.

    As a whole I strongly recommend Evolution. It is an Outlook killer. Unfortunately though, it doesn't forward Melissa, Code-Red, Anna Kourikova, I Love You..... ;)

    1. Re:My thoughts. by jacobito · · Score: 2

      I could be mistaken on the little details, but I believe that "Expunge" is used with IMAP accounts. With IMAP, you can mark messages as deleted, but they won't actually be deleted from the folder until they are expunged.

    2. Re:My thoughts. by mvdwege · · Score: 2
      Hmm. Regarding the colours, that's probably due to the default Gtk/Gnome theme on your machine.

      With some knowledge on how Gtk works you could install a high contrast theme (A3000 is a nice one) to improve it a bit. That requires some .gtkrc hackery though.

      The easier (read: GUI) way is to install the Gnome Control Center and use that to install the theme. Just download, untar, and point the control center to the theme directory (the Control Center looks in ~/.themes by default I believe, so you should untar the theme in there).

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  6. Gentoo Stability ( was Re:Stability?) by Mordant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I could get someone to pay me for constantly tinkering with my boxen, sure, I'd run Genoo - assuming I didn't have any -other- work I needed to get done. ;>

    I'm running Evolution 1.0.7 on Slackware 8.1, and it's rock-solid.

  7. I use Gentoo... by Mr.Ned · · Score: 2

    I have Evolution 1.0.7 running perfectly on Gentoo. Several machines, in fact. Had a problem with 1.0.0 or somewhere around then, but it was minor and hasn't happened since. Works like a charm. Snappier than Outlook ever was.

    I'm using gcc-3, too - no problems. What are your C/XXFLAGS? Overoptimization can be killer. Have you tried the Gentoo Forums? They're a big help.

    1. Re:I use Gentoo... by Jerf · · Score: 2

      The optimization may have been it. It's only been running for a bit now, but I haven't been able to crash it and that's been an improvement.

      My optimization settings are a relatively conservative "-O2 -mcpu686 -pipe" (still 2.95), and this is the first problem I've had with them on this system. Thanks for the suggestion, as I had plum forgot about that.

      I've been looking around on mailing lists and such and was just about to mail gentoo or evolution, but I wanted to nail down which was really responsible first. (Neither, as it turns out.) Since I am also evaluating Evolution for use in an office it seemed an opportune forum to ask my question. (This is a metareply to a couple of the other comments in this thread as well.)

    2. Re:I use Gentoo... by Mr.Ned · · Score: 2

      My optimizations aren't exactly conservative, but don't break stuff either (-march=i686 -pipe -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mmmx -msse -mfpmath=sse) - you might want to give some of those a run (mine is a P3; yours might not have mmx or sse).

      Definitly check the forums (forums.gentoo.org) - they're much more helpful than the mailing lists in my opinion.

  8. no command line by johnjones · · Score: 3, Interesting

    its nice and I played with it for a while but went back to netscape(mozilla 1.0)

    why ? because I use that on all platforms and its nice to have the same gui everywhere win32 mac and unix

    what would be the killer feature ?

    well for me being able to use the command line to read emails via ssh
    (yes I know it can do portf/X11 forwarding but I dont want that e.g. i'm on another box and useing putty I just want to check my mails
    haveing seperate pine install and config is a pain a simple program that picked up evo's prefs would be good )

    regards

    john jones

  9. Evolution is a "killer app" by Outland+Traveller · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been following evolution for a long time now.. Early version pre 1.0 were unstable. However, in true unix fashion the post 1.0 versions have had excellent stability.

    I've been using it exclusively for more than a year and I would never switch back to netscape mail or mozilla mail at this point. Evolution is much faster on my 600Mhz system, and it looks beautiful. It has a rich set of features, an excellent IMAP implementation, innovative stuff like the VFolders, ability to block external images in html mail, palm synchronization, gpg support... I know this is a little too glowing but I can't say enough about how happy I am with this software.

    Evolution and Galeon together provide such a good internet experience that I've been been able to get at least 3 people to switch to Linux.on their merits alone. A coworker just bought an iBook and while she loves OSX she complains all the time that the default browser isn't as good as galeon and the default mailer isn't as nice as evolution.

  10. Wonderful! by penguinboy · · Score: 2

    I've been running 1.0.1 on Mandrake 7 for several months now. It does everything I need and does it well. Calendar, contacts, virtual folders, filtering, multiple accounts, etc. are all there. Stability is excellent as well.

  11. Join the Evo list by SLot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have to say, if you'd join the evo mailing
    list, you'd be very up to date on what problems
    people are having.

    Note that I have no experience with the connector
    portion, as I convinced my corporate masters
    long ago that Exchange was a tool of the devil
    [;)], but the most common issues I see on the
    list are:

    1) lack of inline pgp/gpg support
    2) spell check problems
    3) inability to mail calendar items (which may or
    may not be solved by Connector).

    http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evoluti on

    In all, I don't think I could *ever* go back to netscape or mozilla for mail. When I finally can ditch windows at the office, I expect the app that lets me get away with it will be Evolution.

  12. IMAP by zerOnIne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i do this very thing at work ... i've got all my messages (over 6000 and growing daily) in one massive mailbox, which makes it easy to scroll through in pine, from wherever i am in the company ... and i have evolution, on my desktop, set up to point to the same IMAP account, and do virtual-folder sorting ... that way all my mail is nice and sorted when i'm in the pretty gui that makes it easy to navigate, and all my mail in a nice single list when i'm in a low-bandwidth text session (ie, pine) ...

    i love evolution, and wish there were a windows version so i could switch to it at home, too

    --
    09
    1. Re:IMAP by larien · · Score: 2

      Ditto; I can access the same mail from Windows, linux through a variety of clients (I've used Mozilla, Outhouse, Kmail and Evolution already) and even from a web browser via Imp. I set up IMAP at my last work, as it allowed the same level of access to a cross-platform environment (Solaris/Windows).

  13. Re:My additional thoughts and why not use web? by austad · · Score: 2

    First, Exchange allows you to use the web to access emails and calendar service? I found it to be faster than Evolution. That said, here is my own experience using Evolution.

    Yeah, but have you tried using OWA under Exchange 5.5? It sucks ass. No better than a hotmail account, and slower. Now OWA for Exchange 2000 is nice. It looks and feels just like Outlook. It's better under IE since there are activeX controls for most of it, but using under mozilla is still quite nice. If you have 5.5 though, the web interface is a pig and not worth using except in a dire emergency. :)

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  14. Hyperbole? by rakslice · · Score: 2

    "For the Linux users this makes it necessary to have a second Windows box just for email."

    Do you mean that literally? If yes, I wonder why you aren't using one of the many cheaper options. Off the top of my head:

    - Exchange IMAP support
    - Outlook through WINE (not sure about Outlook Exchange support under WINE)
    - Outlook on a Windows session in VMWare
    - Dual booting Windows to run Outlook

    1. Re:Hyperbole? by rakslice · · Score: 2

      Forgot to add:
      - Outlook session on remote machine through Citrix (no idea about the costs)

    2. Re:Hyperbole? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Outlook session on remote machine through Citrix (no idea about the costs)

      If you have a Windows 2000 server set up as a Terminal server, you can use the remote frame-buffer package to connect using RDP. Mandrake includes rfbdrake, a GUI front-end for the program. Best part is, it lets you connect as a "Windows 2000" PC, using a Windows CAL. Saves paying for a Citrix Server.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Hyperbole? by rakslice · · Score: 2

      >Exchange IMAP doesn't do any of the groupware features...

      Okay,

      >Outlook thru WINE is slow and unreliable

      okay,

      >Dual-booting means rebooting to check mail, and you still need the Windows and Office licenses.

      Windows licensing, sure; Exchange seat licenses include Outlook licensing (AFAIK; MS might have changed this for the newest Exchange release). And it's not like you would buy an Office license just to use Outlook.

      >VMWare works but is slow and expensive (not as expensive as a second PC, but still expensive)

      VMWare & co. are slower than native, but not overwhelmingly so in my experience. (Although my experience with VMWare is primarily with going the other way, running non-UI-intensive linux servery stuff on Windows boxen). Anyway, I'd imagine that the average primary PC for someone running a linux desktop is a bit more speedy than what you'd give out as a secondary system intended only for e-mail use to begin with; the speed impact may not matter that much. However, if the e-mail systems are all repurposed legacy desktop POSes, there could be a cost savings over VMWare (although that would depend on the cost of everything from maintenance to power and real estate).

  15. We use it by riggwelter · · Score: 2, Informative

    We have a few Linux users (and more, all being well) on the desktop ,with Exchange 5.5 as the company's internal mail server. This actually recludes us using Connector, as it's only available for 2000.

    We have no problems, we use IMAP & SMTP for mail, we can access the directry using LDAP, the only thing we can't access is shared calendaring, but we don't care about that ;-) (Will be nice when someone writes a free backend calendar server for Evo though - will make it easier for us to propse a wholesale movement away from Exchange)

    When we schedule meetings, Outlook users can happily see & use the appointment dobries sent to them in iCal format, although when they do the same to use, Outlook doesn't send them in the right format, so the information just appears as the body of the mail, it's readable though ,and trivial to copy/paste into an appointment in your own calendar.

    It even handles mails sent in that annoying TNEF format of Outlook's, provided you have an up-to-date version of WINE or gtnef (See bug #232)

    --
    Listening for the sound of the coming rain...
    1. Re:We use it by Raleel · · Score: 2

      actually, with outlok you can "forward as iCalendar". Look under the Action menu. It's just not the default (which is sad, really).

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
  16. Try Crossover Office by Zurion · · Score: 2

    I'm in a very similar situation. At work I use Linux on my workstation--one of the few. We use Outlook pretty extensively, and so far Codeweavers Office works pretty well. It's around $50, and you can install Word, Outlook, Excel, and Internet Explorer, if you so desire, which is slightly flakier than normal with the plugin. Our Exchange servers are still running NT 4.0, which prevents me from trying Evolution.

    Anyway, here's the link.

  17. OWA (Outlook Web Access by eclectric · · Score: 2

    I use windows at work, but don't like to use Office, so I use Mozilla for mail, and use outlook web access to get to calendar and other groupware information. Problem solved.

    Almost any exchange server will have an imap server. (imap.exchange.xxx)

  18. Very few problems with Evolution by xrayspx · · Score: 2

    But the ones I have include a nasty UI bug, in message composition, I HAVE to shift-tab to move from the message box into the address boxes, mouse clicking does not work here. Also it seems to leave a lot of orphan processes when it quits, even if you quit gracefully. Often after exiting Evolution I cannot relaunch without doing killall evolution-mail first.

    This is with Evolution 1.0.5 and 1.0.8, as well as 1.0.3 (supported), on RH 7.1 and 7.3 in KDE2 & 3.

    I haven't tried Connector because I'm too lazy and cheap, but it works great with IMAP.