Slashdot Mirror


Arianne ALPHA 2 Released

Miguel Angel Blanch Lardin writes "Arianne is a Game Engine to build Internet games and applications. You can use it to create your own games, from RPG to Realtime strategy games, arcade or Turn based strategy ones." We noted Arianne two years ago.

Miguel continues: This release of Arianne is a major milestone on our goal to get a working framework for simple online games creation. It features a new working and playable 2D Client with new gfx, music and sfx.
This release features also a working RP system on C++ with the next actions: Move, Chat, Attack, Spell, Get, Put, Consume, Look.
Arianne allows now a hardware limited number of connections to the server so you can have as much players as your hardware allow.
All files on Arianne features XML syntax.

Go to Arianne and get it.
Report problems with Arianne to Sourceforge Bugs Tracker

P.S:
We need binary packages for BeOS and MacOS X.
We need reports about BeOS, MacOSX, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris, IRIX, QNX, Linux and Windows NT.
We need new GFX ( don't ask what are them, look and do ).
We need new SFX ( _.wav )

26 of 105 comments (clear)

  1. Re:wow by (Score+5,+Wow) · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You mean, like that slashdot poll: favourite business game :)

  2. Why FreeBSD is dying by poopbot by adexonq · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    The End of FreeBSD

    [ed. note: in the following text, former FreeBSD developer Mike Smith gives his reasons for abandoning FreeBSD]

    When I stood for election to the FreeBSD core team nearly two years ago, many of you will recall that it was after a long series of debates during which I maintained that too much organisation, too many rules and too much formality would be a bad thing for the project.

    Today, as I read the latest discussions on the future of the FreeBSD project, I see the same problem; a few new faces and many of the old going over the same tired arguments and suggesting variations on the same worthless schemes. Frankly I'm sick of it.

    FreeBSD used to be fun. It used to be about doing things the right way. It used to be something that you could sink your teeth into when the mundane chores of programming for a living got you down. It was something cool and exciting; a way to spend your spare time on an endeavour you loved that was at the same time wholesome and worthwhile.

    It's not anymore. It's about bylaws and committees and reports and milestones, telling others what to do and doing what you're told. It's about who can rant the longest or shout the loudest or mislead the most people into a bloc in order to legitimise doing what they think is best. Individuals notwithstanding, the project as a whole has lost track of where it's going, and has instead become obsessed with process and mechanics.

    So I'm leaving core. I don't want to feel like I should be "doing something" about a project that has lost interest in having something done for it. I don't have the energy to fight what has clearly become a losing battle; I have a life to live and a job to keep, and I won't achieve any of the goals I personally consider worthwhile if I remain obligated to care for the project.

    Discussion

    I'm sure that I've offended some people already; I'm sure that by the time I'm done here, I'll have offended more. If you feel a need to play to the crowd in your replies rather than make a sincere effort to address the problems I'm discussing here, please do us the courtesy of playing your politics openly.

    From a technical perspective, the project faces a set of challenges that significantly outstrips our ability to deliver. Some of the resources that we need to address these challenges are tied up in the fruitless metadiscussions that have raged since we made the mistake of electing officers. Others have left in disgust, or been driven out by the culture of abuse and distraction that has grown up since then. More may well remain available to recruitment, but while the project is busy infighting our chances for successful outreach are sorely diminished.

    There's no simple solution to this. For the project to move forward, one or the other of the warring philosophies must win out; either the project returns to its laid-back roots and gets on with the work, or it transforms into a super-organised engineering project and executes a brilliant plan to deliver what, ultimately, we all know we want.

    Whatever path is chosen, whatever balance is struck, the choosing and the striking are the important parts. The current indecision and endless conflict are incompatible with any sort of progress.

    Trying to dissect the above is far beyond the scope of any parting shot, no matter how distended. All I can really ask of you all is to let go of the minutiae for a moment and take a look at the big picture. What is the ultimate goal here? How can we get there with as little overhead as possible? How would you like to be treated by your fellow travellers?

    Shouts

    To the Slashdot "BSD is dying" crowd - big deal. Death is part of the cycle; take a look at your soft, pallid bodies and consider that right this very moment, parts of you are dying. See? It's not so bad.

    To the bulk of the FreeBSD committerbase and the developer community at large - keep your eyes on the real goals. It's when you get distracted by the politickers that they sideline you. The tireless work that you perform keeping the system clean and building is what provides the platform for the obsessives and the prima donnas to have their moments in the sun. In the end, we need you all; in order to go forwards we must first avoid going backwards.

    To the paranoid conspiracy theorists - yes, I work for Apple too. No, my resignation wasn't on Steve's direct orders, or in any way related to work I'm doing, may do, may not do, or indeed what was in the tea I had at lunchtime today. It's about real problems that the project faces, real problems that the project has brought upon itself. You can't escape them by inventing excuses about outside influence, the problem stems from within.

    To the politically obsessed - give it a break, if you can. No, the project isn't a lemonade stand anymore, but it's not a world-spanning corporate juggernaut either and some of the more grandiose visions going around are in need of a solid dose of reality. Keep it simple, stupid.

    To the grandstanders, the prima donnas, and anyone that thinks that they can hold the project to ransom for their own agenda - give it a break, if you can. When the current core were elected, we took a conscious stand against vigorous sanctions, and some of you have exploited that. A new core is going to have to decide whether to repeat this mistake or get tough. I hope they learn from our errors.

    Future

    I started work on FreeBSD because it was fun. If I'm going to continue, it has to be fun again. There are things I still feel obligated to do, and with any luck I'll find the time to meet those obligations.

    However I don't feel an obligation to get involved in the political mess the project is in right now. I tried, I burnt out. I don't feel that my efforts were worthwhile. So I won't be standing for election, I won't be shouting from the sidelines, and I probably won't vote in the next round of ballots.

    You could say I'm packing up my toys. I'm not going home just yet, but I'm not going to play unless you can work out how to make the project somewhere fun to be again.

    = Mike

    --

    To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. -- Theodore Roosevelt



    - poopbot: information likes to be narrow

    HcOVIAQELS
  3. Re:THIS AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Miguel Angel Bin Laden writes "Arianne is a Holy War to destroy the western world. You can use it to create your own germs, from Polio to Smallpox, nuclear or conventional weapons." We noted Arianne two years ago.

  4. another "game development on the cheap" thread :) by H3XA · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    which means of course another troll bath... :(

    seems the topic of the day is free game development.... first Freeciv, then the article on "mods" and now a game engine

    now every genre has been covered that I like - "civ games", FPS and now RPG. I hope someone makes a RPG of high quality with this engine, perhaps a rewrite of an old console classic *hint* *hint*

    - HeXa

  5. Dear Slashdot Editors by Disevidence · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I would like to draw everyone's attention to something.

    Recently, the slashdot editors changed the rules for people with low karma.

    Now, people with negative or "terrible" karma can only post 2 comments per day, which is blatantly censorship.

    This has forced all the negative users to post anoynmously, which creates more noise at higher levels, and drowns out legitimate AC's. I find this needlessly foolish, as I cannot listen to genuine anonymous posts due to pwp and random crapfloods. IP banning is pointless, because it is so easy to use proxies.

    Please, allow the negative users no restrictions, so they move back to -1.

    Thank you.

    --
    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
    1. Re:Dear Slashdot Editors by plaa · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I would like to draw everyone's attention to something.

      Somehow, I guessed this would be rated Offtopic. Strictly speaking, it doesn't deal in any way with the article, but with Slashdot in general.

      However, what would be a better forum for discussion? There is no "Slashdot talk" forum, and news about Slashdot rarely is posted. The karma rules were changed, but no story was posted - where are you supposed to talk about it? (Well, there are the journals, but that's just talking to yourself. Nearly nobody reads them, with very few exceptions.)

      IMO every Slashdot post deals with Slashdot, and the parent would be on-topic in any of them. There shouldn't be too much stuff about Slashdot that it would clog the discussion. So why not let the discussion go on? Unless, of course, the editors don't want people talking about such matters.

      I would probably moderate the parent up, but I guess I have already been banned from moderation. I don't know why.

      Neither of these are trolls, but discussion about Slashdot on Slashdot. Both this and the parent comment have been posted with the +1 Bonus, so the posters can't be mere trolls.

      (This will probably also be modded down, but hell, I've already hit the limit so I've got some to spare.)

      --

      I doubt, therefore I may be.
    2. Re:Dear Slashdot Editors by Fucky+the+troll · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      izzafakt

      --






      Roadkill is yummy.
    3. Re:Dear Slashdot Editors by selderrr · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I'll throw in my +1 bonus too, so the thread doesn't die out. Other 50karma holders might do so too : it's our only way of getting attention

      the whole issue is that slashdot isn't what it pretends to be : a free forum about stuff for nerds.

      It isn't free (beer nor speech)
      it's not for nerds anymore. It's for computer illeterates and laywers

      Most of the articles on /. are offtopic ! I wish we could metamoderate the editors when they select or reject

      Anyway, all this is, as u said, beating a dead horse. /. isn't what it used to be anymore, and it won't be coming back. I'm hanging around just to find an alternative in some sigs, which will popup sooner or later (My bet is that it will be OSX based :-)

    4. Re:Dear Slashdot Editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      At least Taco admits his selfishness and insecurities about posting meta stories on slashdot. He just can't take the heat when it's on him.

      Of course, this thread and all posts will be modded -1 by the editors, strictly they consider these coments inappropriate and offtopic (the horror!) And if you disagree, well better not mod back up, because they'll just ban your ass from ever moderating again.

      So no matter how much we want to discuss slashdot policies and procedures, we just won't get that avenue on slashdot.

    5. Re:Dear Slashdot Editors by Simon+Brooke · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      the whole issue is that slashdot isn't what it pretends to be : a free forum about stuff for nerds.

      It isn't free (beer nor speech) it's not for nerds anymore. It's for computer illeterates and laywers

      Most of the articles on /. are offtopic ! I wish we could metamoderate the editors when they select or reject

      If you don't like it, there's an easy solution. Set up your own server, install a copy of slash (or write your own system), and run your own site. It's like any open source project - if you don't like the way the maintainers are taking it, you can always fork the codebase.

      Obviously you'll need to pay for the bandwidth, sort out the arguments over moderation policy, and decide what appears on the front page...

      Just like /.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    6. Re:Dear Slashdot Editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Quit yer bellyacheing! If you can't stand reading Slashdot then don't! There is nowhere to discuss Slashdot on Slashdot because the people who bring you Slashdot choose not to deal with the gigantic headache that comes with running a feedback forum.

      Why any of you whiners hasen't started your own "Slashdot Watchdog" site has got me baffled, if you managed to get enough people on there and started making waves perhaps someone will start listening to you. (Rather than posting something that will be tagged as Offtopic/Troll and buried below a sea of "First Post!" AC guano).

      So I reiterate: Slashdot is run the way it is because that is the way the people who run it see fit, it's not run by the community it spawned. If you don't like it there are plenty of /. clones (like K5) to go visit.

      Sorry for this rant, but the frequency of these "/. Doesen't listen to the little guy" posts is really starting to drive me nuts!

    7. Re:Dear Slashdot Editors by damiam · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      The karma rules were changed, but no story was posted - where are you supposed to talk about it?

      Right here.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  6. Engrish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ( don't ask what are them, look and do )

    With a name like that, im not surprised about the grammer and spelling.

  7. Re:MS Word Grammar Checker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Oh man you have no fucking clue, right?

    No, the UK and the US are NOT the center of the world....

    There are actually other people living on earth that speak other languages.

    REALLY!

  8. Re:MS Word Grammar Checker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I'm with you Anonymous. Here's hoping the Jihad is 1/2 as devastating the Crusades were. Die Capitalist pigs!

  9. Re:MS Word Grammar Checker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Oh man you have no fucking clue, right?

    No, the UK and the US are NOT the center of the world....

    There are actually other people living on earth that speak other languages.

    REALLY!

    Why are you trying to speak English then? Can't you just talk in your own language?

    Why do you feel compelled to torture us ?

  10. [klerck] Dear Ask Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    For the last week or so, I've been seriously considering suicide. My question isn't really whether or not I should do it because I've already decided that I will. What I do want to know is HOW I should do it. I figure I've got three real options: hanging, shooting, and jumping.

    Hanging: Two problems with this... First of all it's boring. I mean, God, there's no excitement in just hanging there! Second, it could be somewhat painful. Choking to death doesn't exactly turn me on. Of course, I could auto-erotically asphyxiate myself to death, I suppose.

    Shooting: This seems to be the way I will likely go. It's quick, it's (hopefully) painless, and very messy which means very exciting! The only problem I have with this is that everybody seems to go out this way these days. Kurt Cobain, Vincent van Gogh, Ernest Hemingway... the list goes on. Do I really want to be known as just another guy who shot himself?

    Jumping: Again, two problems... It's not certain unless I jump from something really high, and in my area, the tallest buildings are only two stories. Second, even though I am clearly highly suicidal, what if I suddenly change my mind right after I jump? At least with the other two, I don't have time to think about it!

    Please, give me your suggestions, and I will take them to heart. Then, I will finally have a happy and successful suicide.

    Regards,
    klerck

    DTABN

    1. Re:[klerck] Dear Ask Slashdot by Viking+of+the+north · · Score: -1, Offtopic


      You'll find some good suggestion on consumtionjunciton

      --

      All work and no play makes me a dull boy
  11. Re:Is it just me by selderrr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    err..

    no ?

    cx stands for christmas island, which is a very nice domain if you think about it.
    friend of mine has his nice linux box out there too

  12. Re:Is it just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    here is another nice box, just for you.

  13. Do you Opera users love it wide? I know I do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    oiasubriunivauwherviusanierunaiurhnkajneiranwioeur hqakjsenrfksauidyfzkxjdfnbksdriuahifbsdfhisoauhroi auhsfzbnxcghidsuhgiasbdfiouzhxcgiubwiueraiuheajbfn dmzhfsroueahfbasjfhzxufheiharkjdfkjabbuisdofyweiry ashbfajshdjkzbxkcjfsheirsaidufyzjhfkjsahdfkjasnriu yseriuashdfkjzbcfkjshairhaiuhfrkajbsfdkjzhfiuherua fkjashfkudfiuhasdkfbaskjbfksadfhiuzudfhoiasubriuni vauwherviusanierunaiurhnkajneiranwioeurhqakjsenrfk sauidyfzkxjdfnbksdriuahifbsdfhisoauhroiauhsfzbnxcg hidsuhgiasbdfiouzhxcgiubwiueraiuheajbfndmzhfsrouea hfbasjfhzxufheiharkjdfkjabbuisdofyweiryashbfajshdj kzbxkcjfsheirsaidufyzjhfkjsahdfkjasnriuyseriuashdf kjzbcfkjshairhaiuhfrkajbsfdkjzhfiuheruafkjashfkudf iuhasdkfbaskjbfksadfhiuzudfhoiasubriunivauwhervius anierunaiurhnkajneiranwioeurhqakjsenrfksauidyfzkxj dfnbksdriuahifbsdfhisoauhroiauhsfzbnxcghidsuhgiasb dfiouzhxcgiubwiueraiuheajbfndmzhfsroueahfbasjfhzxu fheiharkjdfkjabbuisdofyweiryashbfajshdjkzbxkcjfshe irsaidufyzjhfkjsahdfkjasnriuyseriuashdfkjzbcfkjsha irhaiuhfrkajbsfdkjzhfiuheruafkjashfkudfiuhasdkfbas kjbfksadfhiuzudfhoiasubriunivauwherviusanierunaiur hnkajneiranwioeurhqakjsenrfksauidyfzkxjdfnbksdriua hifbsdfhisoauhroiauhsfzbnxcghidsuhgiasbdfiouzhxcgi ubwiueraiuheajbfndmzhfsroueahfbasjfhzxufheiharkjdf kjabbuisdofyweiryashbfajshdjkzbxkcjfsheirsaidufyzj hfkjsahdfkjasnriuyseriuashdfkjzbcfkjshairhaiuhfrka jbsfdkjzhfiuheruafkjashfkudfiuhasdkfbaskjbfksadfhi uzudfhoiasubriunivauwherviusanierunaiurhnkajneiran wioeurhqakjsenrfksauidyfzkxjdfnbksdriuahifbsdfhiso auhroiauhsfzbnxcghidsuhgiasbdfiouzhxcgiubwiueraiuh eajbfndmzhfsroueahfbasjfhzxufheiharkjdfkjabbuisdof yweiryashbfajshdjkzbxkcjfsheirsaidufyzjhfkjsahdfkj asnriuyseriuashdfkjzbcfkjshairhaiuhfrkajbsfdkjzhfi uheruafkjashfkudfiuhasdkfbaskjbfksadfhiuzudfhoiasu briunivauwherviusanierunaiurhnkajneiranwioeurhqakj senrfksauidyfzkxjdfnbksdriuahifbsdfhisoauhroiauhsf zbnxcghidsuhgiasbdfiouzhxcgiubwiueraiuheajbfndmzhf sroueahfbasjfhzxufheiharkjdfkjabbuisdofyweiryashbf ajshdjkzbxkcjfsheirsaidufyzjhfkjsahdfkjasnriuyseri uashdfkjzbcfkjshairhaiuhfrkajbsfdkjzhfiuheruafkjas hfkudfiuhasdkfbaskjbfksadfhiuzudfh


    -klerck

    DTABN

  14. Re:Is it just me by zapfie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    He was referring to the infamous goatse.cx link that is often posted here.

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  15. Re:Yoda by selderrr · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    oh come'on, it's a joke for bill's sake !

    /. is full of this kind of snearing. keed in mind that, if each of the few hunderdthousand /. readers were to post such a remark ,only once, you'd have hundreds per day. So all in all, /. is a fairly tolerant place it seems.

    And anyways, I wasn't laughing at the poster in person. Just the coincidence of yoda-speak. I found it quite funny. If you don't, don't moderate a post of +2 as 'overrated' because your sense of humor differs. And I definitely wasn't overrated since I wasn't even rated !

  16. [Adolf Hitroll] Jamie is a dickhead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Yessitwaz...

    "Call It A Night, Cowboy!

    Slashdot only allows a user with your karma to post 2 times per day. You've already shared your thoughts with us that many times. Take a breather, and come back and see us in 24 hours or so.

    If you think this is unfair, please email jamie@slashdot.org with your username "Adolf Hitroll". Let us know how many comments you think you've posted in the last 24 hours.
    "

    can't believe they are so dumb...

    I take a week holiday and then I am asked to take one more night...

    Jamie, I won't mail you (2KB for a private "fsck you" is too small), I prefer burning your bandwidth an exponentially higher way by just posting some text here that a few thousand people will also load... several dozen MB gone...
    Slashdot yourself, you moron.

  17. Re:Yoda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    ...taking the piss out of the guys' English...Unless you can talk his first language (Spanish?) at least as well as he talks English your best bet is prolly to hush up.
    Translation:... criticizing the guy's english... Unless you can speak his first language.... at least as well as he speaks English, your best bet...
    I really hope english isnt your first language : )
  18. Its A Conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ... to ban Anonymous Coward posts
    First it was the Trolls, no-one said anything cause well.. They are Trolls
    Then it was the Anonymous Cowards, no-one said anything.. cause they were mostly Trolls now
    Then ... I'm not exactly sure how this was meant to go anyway