Slashdot Mirror


Robots Go Spelunking

anakog writes "Yahoo! News runs a story about robots being used by the military in Afghanistan to search caves. The article features a few slides with pictures and comments. This seems to be the first time robots are used as tools for combat, although the article does not say if they have encountered any resistance yet. There is no mention of the manufacturer of the robots, however, I am fairly certain that they are the PackBots manufactured by IRobot. I happened to visit Real World Interface (which later merged with IRobot) a couple of years ago and saw the PackBots' predecessors, which were called Urban Robots. The company had a contract with the Department of Defence. As the name implies, the military were envisioning to use the robots to scan buildings in urban areas back then."

35 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Packbots by Ratface · · Score: 2, Redundant

    ... let me see, clicking the link in my robots.net Slashdot sidebar confirms that, yes - they are indeed iRobot Packbots. ;-)

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
  2. Other features by rushiferu · · Score: 2, Redundant

    I wonder how long until the army starts to attach other things besides cameras to these little bots. Chemical sensors, IR, guns, a few pounds of C4 and some roofing nails....

    1. Re:Other features by YouTalkinToMe · · Score: 2, Informative
      From the story:

      The four, $40,000 prototypes - Hermes, Professor, Thing and Fester - can hold up to 12 cameras, a grenade launcher and a 12-gauge shotgun. The robots operate on a sensor system and by wireless desktop control. They are fitted with a Global Positioning System, and can see themselves and each other on a map, ensuring more efficient searches. They run on 2, 6-pound rechargeable batteries that run one hour each.

      So they can already carry weapons.

    2. Re:Other features by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Hell yeah. There is something about imagining terrorists in a cave watching a robot that "just doesn't give a f**k" turn and point it's 12 gauge shotgun at you and fire. They may kill the robot, but we can just build more. The robots are fearless and i think it is sweet.

      That being said, as a caver myself, I could not imaging designing a robot to go into caves. I am sure Afganistan caves are different than the ones here (northwest US), but the caves here would be impossible for any track vehicle to operate in. They would drop of large cliffs, get stuck in water, would need to be able to scale very steep surfaces, and jump from rock to rock, etc.

      ALghough the Afgan caves sound like they are more like dug out bunkers. I am sure the US military knows WTF they are doing.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  3. Can a Robot Commit a War Crime? by Dr.+JJJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The robots in this article appear to be remotely controlled by a human operator but I can't help think that over time these robots and their predecessors will be given limited autonomy to execute tasks, and perhaps even kill. So given that future (which I admit is unlikely), what happens if a bot fails to obey the oxymoronicly-titled but somehow accepted Law of Land Warfare? If this violation came to trial, who would stand accused of the crime?

    1. Re:Can a Robot Commit a War Crime? by capt.Hij · · Score: 2
      The persons responsible should be the folks who designed the robot. Of course this would mean that they would have to anticipate every possible outcome. For instance one of the rules is the following:

      Also, apart from the baths and showers with which the camps shall be furnished, prisoners of war shall be provided with sufficient water and soap for their personal toilet and for washing their personal laundry; the necessary installations, facilities and time shall be granted them for that purpose. (GPW, art. 29.)

      Therefore combat robots should come equipped with showers and soap on a rope in order to properly care for their prisoners.

    2. Re:Can a Robot Commit a War Crime? by Basje · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "The persons responsible should be the folks who designed the robot."

      I think this is the most ignorant I heard today. What you say is akin to saying dell would be responsible for me smashing someone's head in with this laptop. Or to saying that Einstein was to be held responsible for the Hiroshima bombing.

      Designers and manufacturerers are responsible for their products, but only as far as it's functionality: if it functions well, within their specifications, and not outside of those, that's it. It is (or at least should be) the responsibility of the person or organisation that uses/deploys them, that is responsible for the results. In that respect it's similar to a smart bomb.

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
  4. Re:Packbots - Selling Digital Cameras by capt.Hij · · Score: 2

    After viewing the yahoo "slidewhow" I had assumed that the article was just a cheesy way to sell digital cameras.

  5. Re:so by ComaVN · · Score: 3, Funny

    yes, but they have added a fourth one:
    4. Except if it looks like a terrorist.

    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  6. Re:From the PDF: "Operating System: Linux" by JPriest · · Score: 3, Funny
    Any questions ?

    yes, what dependencies do I need to install guided-missle-system-0.98.5.i386.rpm?

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  7. Packbots Demo @ ALS Oakland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was privledged to see the Packbot demo'd at ALS in Oakland last year. It crawled down the stage stairs, back up the stairs, then off the stage, a 3.5-4 foot drop! They had a video clip of it running through a small "water hazard". It was completly submerged, and all you saw was the wake. Rather impressive.

  8. Perhaps not the first time... by pease1 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This seems to be the first time robots are used as tools for combat...

    In WWII, the German army used a remote control tank that was filled with explosives and driven into a target. A photo is here (about half down the page).

    While not a true robot (I think these were control via wires), they were used in combat a good bit, including attacking landing craft during the D-Day invasion.

    Another German tank, the Borgward IV was a surviable remote control vehicle driven by radio and was used to lay mines, telephone wire and the likes.

    1. Re:Perhaps not the first time... by mikewas · · Score: 2

      The robots described in this article don't seem to be true robots either. Their remote control is much more sophisticated than their WW2 German ancestors, they still lack autonomy.

      In addition, the modern military has been using flying robots extensivly: UAVs (Unmanned Air Vehicles) that were first used by the Israelis, have been in the US arsenal for decades and have seen action since the Gulf War.

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
  9. Israeli sapper robot by woolite · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Israeli sapper robot in action.

    1. Re:Israeli sapper robot by Capt_Troy · · Score: 2

      I hope the robot was alright!

    2. Re:Israeli sapper robot by SPYvSPY · · Score: 2

      It should be noted that there is a big ass automatic shotgun on the end of that arm appendage. I think that sequence is so fucking cool, for a hundred different reasons. They should have shot that guy in the balls, though.

  10. spe�lunk�er by stux · · Score: 3, Informative

    spelunker n.

    One who explores caves chiefly as a hobby; a caver.

    [From obsolete spelunk, cave, from Middle English, from Old French spelunque, from Latin spelunca, from Greek spelunx.]

    spelunking n.

    --

    ---
    Live Long & Prosper \\//_
    CYA STUX =`B^) 'da Captain,
    Jedi & Last *-fytr
  11. These were developed for urban areas? by God!+Awful · · Score: 2

    Clearly, what is called for here is semi-autonomous robotic spiders.

    -a

  12. World is catching up to sci fi by sunhou · · Score: 2

    Finally we are catching up to one of the standard elements of sci-fi. E.g. one current example involving the military, on Stargate SG-1 they usually send a robot probe through the gate first, to make sure the planet they are about to has an atmosphere and isn't full of enemies ready to shoot them as soon as they step through the gate. The Stargate robots are bigger though, since they are loaded with measuring devices. They also use small remote-controlled aircraft on Stargate, another thing the US military is starting to explore. (That's one reason I like Stargate -- it's very grounded in current real life.)

    Also, the guy in the third photo in the slides linked to in the article looks like he is wearing a Borg eyepiece. :-)

    1. Re:World is catching up to sci fi by vr · · Score: 2

      That's one reason I like Stargate -- it's very grounded in current real life.

      oh yeah.. Gua'oulds, travelling between dimensions, travelling faster than light, zappers that first stun, then kill and then disintegrates people.. all very current real life-ish. :)

  13. Discovery.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..channel had a good show on robots and how the military would use them. Hermes looks like the robot they were demoing on tv. The soldier just grabbed it by the handle and flung it over a wall and let it go searching. It seemed really durable.

    They also had these awesome little spy planes that fit inside a briefcase. To launch it, they had a little air piston that shot it into flight.

  14. I'm sorry, but I really can't let you do that Dave by geoswan · · Score: 2

    What happens when it is time to turn it off

  15. Don't you guys know anything? by SkyLeach · · Score: 2
    --
    My $0.02 will always be worth more than your â0.02, so :-p
  16. Range must be limited by Hayzeus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they rely on GPS for navigation, the robots must not be able to get that far into the cave. For that matter, I imagine the video feed and wireless communications are a major limiting factor on the depth to which the robot can explore -- I know the robo-mining people have been trying to solve this problem for some time now. Sure, the military probably has some nifty alien technology and all, but a cave is a cave, and RF is RF. I'd guess the controller still needs to be reasonably close for this to work well. My own teleoperated robot is nowhere near as kewl (as the kids say) , but if there are enough requests, I'd be happy to install a grenade launcher.

  17. Same Robot Used to Search WTC site by Mad+Man · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was at Acroname's Robo02 robotics expo in Boulder, Colorado, earlier this year.

    Lt. Colonel John Blitch (US Army, Ret.), of the Center for Robotic Assisted Search and Rescue, brought one of the Packbots that had been used in Afghanistan to the expo for his presentation on robotic search and rescue. (The robot still had Afghan dirt all over it).

    A similar model was used, and lost, during the search at the World Trade Center site. Pictures of it at the WTC can be seen at http://www.csee.usf.edu/robotics/crasar/photoGalle ry.html.

  18. That thing has good specs by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative
    400G shock resistance, waterproof to 3 meters. And mechanically simple. I'm impressed.

    It's not just a teleoperator, either. It has sonars, GPS, and a magnetic compass. It ought to be able to retrace a route it's already taken.

  19. And the other side's robots? by Tablizer · · Score: 2


    When a Talabot dies in battle, does it get to link into 72 virgin Cray's in it's afterlife?

  20. Grenade launchers and 12-gauge shotgun by cybermace5 · · Score: 2

    Nobody read the article and noticed this? People keep posting that they're wondering how long it will take for the Army to put weapons on these.

    The typical geek response to a robot is "Oh...HOW CUTE!" and run up to it to find out how it works. I think that a flotilla of shotgun-toting robots would change that response pretty quickly.

    So they're already armed. How long before we see lines of robots armed with shotguns and tear gas herding protestors, or quashing riots? Good or bad, you decide.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Grenade launchers and 12-gauge shotgun by laserjet · · Score: 2

      How long before we see lines of robots armed with shotguns and tear gas herding protestors, or quashing riots? Good or bad, you decide.

      That all depends...

      If we have the robots on our side, good.

      If the robots are on the other side, bad... very bad!

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:Grenade launchers and 12-gauge shotgun by geoswan · · Score: 2
      Dumb question. How does a 12-gauge shotgun compare with other shotguns? I used google to look up some web-sites. I gather that 16 gauge and other gauges, have smaller diameter barrels. I also read that there are various kinds or ammunition. "00", "buckshot", and according to this gun enthusiast's web-site, odd specialty ammunition, that fires bean-bags or incendiary charges. But I would welcome slashdot readers who know about this stuff to explain more fully what ammunition loads a shotgun weilding robot should use.

      I saw a show on TV about bomb-defusing robots, like the packbot, but a bit bigger. The show explained that they used to mount a shotgun, intended to blow apart the fuse mechanism of bombs. But these are replaced by these high powered squirt guns. They disrupt the fuse mechanism with a high-pressure, supersonic slug of water. This is less likely to set off the fuse than a shotgun blast. The squirt gun fired with a single boom, like a shotgun. It would be hard for a casual observer to distinguish it from a shotgun.

      Probably only lethal at extremely close range.

  21. Re:GPS in a cave? by laserjet · · Score: 2

    The robots would not use the GPS in the cave, obviously. They do have other means of navigation than from satellites, you know.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  22. Re:Robots to do man's work?? by laserjet · · Score: 2

    mmmmmm...... baclava.... mmmmmmmm.... I love that stuff.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  23. Re:Not REALLY robots by laserjet · · Score: 2

    Robots don't have to do things for themselves. According to dictionary.com:

    robot: 1. A mechanical device that sometimes resembles a human and is capable of performing a variety of often complex human tasks on command or by being programmed in advance.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  24. it got renamed... by SPYvSPY · · Score: 2

    ...the new name for bravery is "stupidity". Please update your records accordingly.

  25. OT: My sig by SPYvSPY · · Score: 2

    Thanks. It's from the idiotic ATMs in NYC. I think it sucks, too. I'll change it some day.