The Bulova Accutron
warewolfsmith writes "The Bulova Accutron. Introduced in 1961, it was the first successful transistorized watch, far more accurate than any other watch then on the market and a major advance in timekeeping technology. Prior to reading this article I had never heard of it. Interesting history." There are a number of websites devoted to it.
Who cares how accurately it kept time? The more important issue at hand is.... Does it run Linux? ;-)
I'm sure NetBSD's already working on a port
S.t.e.v.e.
I have an old toothbrush you can do a story on. I might have a pair of transistorized crotchless panties also, but don't hold me to that.
The most important thing any republican needs to know.
Thank you.
All for me
Trek across the space
It'll be just like they say
Ooh ooh ooh ooh yeah
Since I've been told
I'm from the three
He has no memories
Of lights in the night
Ooh ooh ooh ooh yeah
They went away
They went away
My manta ray is alright
My manta ray is alright
My manta ray is alright
My manta ray is alright
There is they say
My mother too
A fish from God has filled
Above hy head at night
Ooh ooh ooh ooh yeah
There is a way
There is a way
My manta ray is alright
My manta ray is alright
My manta ray is alright
My manta ray is alright
somebozo writes "The facsimile machine, introduced in 1966, is an amazing device that sends images through a phone line! It's far quicker than sending something in the mail and a real advancement in communications technology! Prior to learning about the fax machine, I had never learned about it before. Very interesting." Gee, we are really running short on stories today.
mogorific carpentry experiments
I'm glad you aren't important enough to warrant your own name
Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
PLEASE, PLEASE stop posting links to registration pages!
/. is getting a kickback from them.. If that is the case, the least you guys could do is be honest about it..
If there is no way to post a link that goes directly to the story without checking cookies or registration or other nonsense - FIND ANOTHER STORY or another site with the same story.
There have been so many posts with links to NYTimes stor^H^H^H^Hregistration pages, I'm beginning to wonder if
ok come back after lunch...
Siggy Say, Siggy Do
I've made more than 2 posts today. And if I wanted to troll like you do, I'd make more than 10. What are you gibbering about?
Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
This will be my 13th post today.
I'll help u (sic) with this one.
13 > 10
So take your randomly capitalised Insignificance and shove it up your ass.
no-one is your fsckin friend
Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
Has anybody noticed that MANY of SLashdot's articles are getting progressively worse? I remember, that a few months ago, that many, if not all articles, had about 400 minimum (-1 t o 5). Now, an article is lucky to break the 100 post mark.
/. had propeirty material that posters posted. Slashdot, instead, backed down from the 'policy'
/. that said "Comments are owned by Editor". The article still exists in Slashdot archives, but as SLashdot's search does not work (half-assed), I am not able to find it.
WHat I see, unlike the lies of "bad is dying", is that Slashdot is dying. The evidence to prove that Slashdot is, in fact, dying, is the following:
1: The Censoring (and deletion) of posts. MS claimed that
"All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster."
Deleting posts set a precident on
2: The INFAMOUS bitchslapping (applying -1 modpoints to a whole thread) of the The first Slashdot troll post investigation. And as said on Kuro5hin, "The editors of slashdot seem to be hell-bent on censoring the comment."
However, posts still flourished in slashdot, even though all other "article sites" watched while Slashdot editors made blunder after blunder. However, point 3 is what is burying Slashdot...
3: Bans of known "Trolls", ip bans on "abusive users", and only 10 Anonymous Coward posts from each class C subnet. Slashdot is CENSORING the same group that they compalin to when the big media censors all of us. The sad part is that this act is running off more legitimate users than trolls. Wait 10 minutes after an article has been posted and read at -1... All the trolls use http proxies and post anonomously to avoid Slashdot's censoring attacks.
Now ask yourself..... Why has the amount of posts dropped from 300 per artcile to 100 per article? And no, there wasn't 200 troll posts per article.
So, the more users, the less postings? That's weird...
-- 2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2