Slashdot Mirror


The Bulova Accutron

warewolfsmith writes "The Bulova Accutron. Introduced in 1961, it was the first successful transistorized watch, far more accurate than any other watch then on the market and a major advance in timekeeping technology. Prior to reading this article I had never heard of it. Interesting history." There are a number of websites devoted to it.

37 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. All the clich�d posts into one. by wackybrit · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay, let's get them out of the way so other people can start some real discussions. Here are all the clichéd posts in one easy-to-read post!

    (+1 Funny) -- "The Bulova Accutron replaces the old Bulova Helluvaweight, a valve operated watch which the wearer pulled along behind them in a shopping cart."

    (-1 Flamebait) -- "Who cares about this old crap? It's just old technology that we don't use now anyway."

    (-1 Troll) -- "This sucks. Using transistors in a watch? Nowadays we use pure silicon, which they actually had in the 60's but they were unable to see the benefits."

    (-1 Overrated) -- "Hi, I'm John Romero/Alan Cox/Linus Torvalds, and I thought I'd drop in and just say 'Hi'"

    1. Re:All the clich�d posts into one. by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 2

      It is stories like this that re-emphasises my desire to see the discarded submissions. I bet there is something in the queue that I would find a bit more interesting than a watch advert.

      --
      If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
    2. Re:All the clich�d posts into one. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Funny

      Plus it would be interesting to see the backlog of the queue. It must be HUGE, I mean, this article was submitted over 30 years ago and they only just approved it.

      No wonder they haven't approved my sumbmission on the new Apple Lisa....

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  2. Advertisement? by joshua404 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought paying Slashdot users weren't supposed to be subjected to advertising on the site.

  3. Re:who cares by Rachel+Ellis · · Score: 2

    Why *wouldn't* you care about the first watch ever? I wear my watch every day and couldn't imagine how folks in the '50s went through life without one!

    --

    -
    26 year-old Web developer from Seattle. And yes, chicks do dig *nix ;)
  4. To the moon, Alice... by stuffman64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This watch also holds claim as the only watch ever to be used on the moon. Because of thier super-high precission, these watches became the official watch of NASA (which you should know, of course, because it was in the article). It is just too bad that it is so hard to find an original tuning fork model for a reasonable price (and to find parts to fix it when it breaks!). Oh well....

    --
    --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    1. Re:To the moon, Alice... by benchrest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Those of us who had hands on experiance with the Accutron found out pretty quickly that they had a serious FLAW. When subjected to loud sounds they either paused or speed up. I learned this in an old Hi-Fi shop while demoing smplifiers and speakers. If you pointed out the speaker currently in use by putting your hand up to it, the Accutron would stop! When out of the loud sound environment it would start again.

    2. Re:To the moon, Alice... by Mike+Monett · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Those of us who had hands on experiance with the Accutron found out pretty quickly that they had a serious FLAW...."

      They didn't take too well to strong magnetic fields either. I was at MIT in 1967, and a graduate student was showing me around.

      We found a huge permanent magnet from an old military magnetron mounted on a stand. I decided to stick my hand between the poles to see if I could feel anything.

      The graduate student spotted the accutron on my wrist and said "Don't do that!!"

      Too late. My watch went sproiing and quit. When I took it apart, I found the tuning fork poles had been pulled apart, ruining the mechanism.

      I immediately bought another one, and took much better care of it.

  5. How is that ironic? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Do you even know what that word means?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:How is that ironic? by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      > Do you even know what that word means?
      Of course he does. He's heard the song... :-)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  6. Totally false by sid6581 · · Score: 2

    Search for "Omega Speedmaster" to see which watch was approved by NASA for use on the moon.

    The Accutron movement was used in some instrumentation, if I recall correctly. The watches weren't approved for use on the moon.

  7. Re:Accurate time bla bla by reaper20 · · Score: 2

    You mean like like this?

  8. Re:who cares by DrVxD · · Score: 2

    > Why *wouldn't* you care about the first watch ever?
    The Accutron was scarcely "the first watch ever".

    > I wear my watch every day and couldn't imagine how folks in the '50s went through life without one!
    I haven't worn a watch for about 10 years, since I find them uncomfortable (for reasons which I won't go into). I manage fine, because I live in a world full of clocks. If things get really bad, I can always look up at the sky and get a reasonably good idea of the time.

    --
    Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  9. How to get girls to put their head on your arm! by embarcadero · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wore my Dad's accutron throughout junior high school. People used to ask me about it, and I'd tell them the story of the Astronaut watch.

    The coolest thing was, it hummed all the time, and the desks would amplify the sound. During a test, when all the room was quiet and scratching pencils, I would put it on my desk, next to Nadine, my hot 13-year-old desk mate, and she'd smile at the sound it made. That was great.

    Then she'd say, "Nerd," and stick out her tongue. That was soooooo great. But I would blush.

    Later on, on the foursquare court, people would ask about it, and if I wanted them to think I was cool, I'd let them put their ear to my arm and listen to it.

    I tried the same thing last week. The girl at the bar laughed at me, said, "Nerd," and took my buddy home for some reportedly mind-blowing sex.

    Sigh.

  10. Re:Accurate time bla bla by zapfie · · Score: 2

    Um... before you let your ego get out of check, maybe you should consider who is wrong...

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  11. Re:Transistor history by sallen · · Score: 3, Informative
    Transistors have been around since the days of Henry Ford, so I find it hard to believe that 1961 was the year of the first transistor-filled watch.

    Maybe around since Henry Ford II, not the original. In the 50's the early computers still had tubes and I don't believe even a transistor radio was out until late 50's at the earliest.
    There may have been electric watches prior to the accurton (Hamilton, I recall had early ones), but not transistor filled. It wasn't much before that time that they were able to draw wire fine enough, for one thing, even for coils.

  12. News Flash... Hot off the teletype... by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Bulova Accutron. Introduced in 1961, it was the first successful transistorized watch, far more accurate than any other watch then on the market and a major advance in timekeeping technology. Prior to reading this article I had never heard of it. Interesting history.

    Woah! Oldtimers (pun intended) invented transistorized watches. They also invented things like ICs, CPUs, computers, and television. I don't know if I'm more frightened by the current accepted ignorance of recent history or the M$ Visual Studio .NET (R)(TM) ad that assaulted me when I clicked in.

  13. Why are watches less accurate today? by mangu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Watches used to sail ships have been getting more and more accurate since the 1700's. And watches people carry with them have been getting more and more accurate since the 1700's, to the point that, for the last forty years, a person has been able to carry a watch precise enough for navigation. There is nothing ironic with that, one should not compare apples with oranges.

  14. Re:perspective by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Right... I certainly remember the Accutron, and lusted after it. IIRC the original price was something like $300, which would be the equivalent of $3000 or so today, way way beyond my means (or even my parents' graduation-present means).

    Before the Accutron, watches, even quite expensive ones, could gain or lose a minute A DAY.

    After the Accutron, there was the Pulsar, the first quartz watch, which I also lusted after and also couldn't afford. I believe this was the first quartz watch, certainly the first well-known one. It had a red LED display, and the drain on the batteries was so high that it just displayed a black face until you pushed a button on the side, then the LED's lit up. John D. MacDonald wrote about one in one of the Travis McGee novels, favorably; he said that he liked the idea of a watch that only showed you the time when you WANTED it to, like the old pocket watches with flip-open cases.

    Sometimes technological dreams to come true. In the case of wristwatches, TWO of mine have. In the fifties, quartz-crystal timepieces were huge things--I imagine they were rackmounted but I don't know whether I've ever seen one--that were kept only in places like the Naval Observatory and the Bureau of Standards. Being able to pick up a CHEAP quartz WRISTWATCH at the drugstore is a dream come true.

    The second... well, I don't know if anyone remembers a movie from the sixties, "David and Lisa," starring Keir Dullea and Janet Margolin. Keir Dullea is better known for playing the role of astronaut David Bowman in "2001: A Space Odyssey." It was a heart-touching romance (really!) between a neurotic young man and a psychotic young woman. The young man is obsessed with time and has dreams of being trapped with his head in a huge clock whose rotating hands will eventually decapitate him slowly.

    He tells the psychiatrist that he has a dream of inventing a watch that would synchronize via radio waves from a central location so that everybody could always know the exact time.

    I thought this was a pretty neat idea, so I was a little alarmed when the psychiatrist identified it as a neurotic symptom.

    Anyway, neurotic or not, I have a quartz-crystal wristwatch on my left hand, and upstairs I have a $25 Oregon Scientific clock that synchronizes via radio (WWVB, I think) to an atomic clock in... well, in Colorado anyway. (It's very puzzling... some of the atomic clock companies say the atomic clock is in Fort Collins, some say Boulder. I suspect the truth is that they synchronize to WWVB in Fort Collins which, in turn, is controlled by an atomic clock in Boulder.)

    I've had the radio-controlled clock a year. The only time I actually need to set my watch is when the time changes. I just checked, and my watch and my "atomic" clock are reading within two seconds after each other.

    Dan is happy.

  15. DNA would be proud... by XPhiNermal · · Score: 2, Funny
    Douglas Adams was so insightful.
    Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-two million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue green planet whose ape- descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.
    -Douglas Adams, The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy
  16. Mine still runs by LorenzoV · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I recieved an Accutron, tuning fork type, as a present in 1967. I wore it for years, replacing a battery every few years, getting it cleaned every now and then. In the late 80's, while the Accutron was getting cleaned, I bought a cheap ($10) black plastic digital watch. When the Accutron came back, I put it in a drawer and forgot it.

    I reaquainted myself with the Accutron recently. The battery was shot and had coroded a bit, but it cleaned up nicely and runs like new with the new battery. I think I'll wear it again.

  17. My grandpa had two by tinguru · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When he first heard of them, he ordered one in the mail. Before it was shipped, he found one in a store. My gandpa loved these watches. He said that they were the first rail-road approved wrist watch. Before the accutron, rail road conductors needed pocket watches to keep time well enough to run a rail way. He made a watch band that would let him wear both at once; so no matter what side of his arm he looked at he could see the time. He would set one to local time and the other to Pacific time when traveled to a different time zone. He was a real watch and radio nerd. He listened to WWV "at 10, 15, and 20 Mgz" (the exact time for navagation at sea) all the time so he would know how fast or slow all his watches and clocks were. He loved fixing and adjusting clocks. The accutron work by counting the number of times the tunning fork vibrates. He loved to put his ear to the watch and hear the little tunning fork keep time. He told me quartz clocks work the same way; only the frequency of quartz is way higher than the frequency of the tunning fork. Both are faster than the frequency of a pendulum.

  18. Hella Noisy... by Geiger581 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was given my grandfather's old Accutron (a trend, it seems), and have really enjoyed it. The only thing that ever gets to me is the constant humming. It's a nice novelty to show others, but can get obnoxious in a quiet enough place. With music playing and fans in my computer spinning, it's virtually unnoticeable, but I honestly can't sleep with it sitting on top of my dresser. It spends the night in my sock drawer.
    Also, if you ever get one, pray that it never breaks. I had to have the coils replaced, and there is pretty much one guy on the continent who could fix it. Oh yeah, it scarfs down batteries pretty fast, too. All in all, though, a great watch to have.

    1. Re:Hella Noisy... by 3waygeek · · Score: 2

      . Most modern digital watches might manage to make a battery last 5-10 years...

      Maybe they do on your planet; in my experience, low/mid-priced watches (Casio, Timex, etc.) only get 18-24 months, even though I only use the backlight a couple of times per month.

  19. More accurate than today even! by standards · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To think that a 1960's tuning-fork watch can, given the right conditions, be more accurate than the clocks that service 100,000+ people!

    Alas, most clock services seem to be wrong. My VCR continually records programs at the wrong time. And it's a VCR with a "self setting" clock. It's about 2 minutes wrong.... thanks to a lame broadcaster who doesn't know how to synch a clock.

    This site even tries to make a summary of inaccurate (public) clocks in some guy's world... crazy!

    (Yeah, I know that the Bulova wasn't that super accurate, but it's the principle of the thing! We should have better time 40 years later!)

  20. Other Bulova tuning-fork products by Animats · · Score: 2
    I have a related Bulova device, a resonant mirror galvanometer. This little gadget sweeps a mirror back and forth at a constant frequency. The mirror is about 8mm across, and the whole unit is about 20cm high. At one time I was considering using this in a laser rangefinder.

    I had occasion to call Bulova about this thing, and their switchboard in Brooklyn, NY answered the phone "It's 3:52 Bulova watch time." Very much an old-line company.

    The watch industry was hit hard by quartz watches. Originally, they were developed by the Swiss Institute of Horology to provide a new high-end product. But when they got cheap, it destroyed the mechanical watch business, and with it, most of hte industry in the canton of Neuchatel, Switzerland. The mechanical watch industry used to compete on accuracy, but once cheap watches became good, that was over. High-end watches today are strictly status symbols.

    "Rolex is not in the watch business. We are in the luxury business" - Andre Heiniger, Rolex CEO

    1. Re:Other Bulova tuning-fork products by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 2
      The mechanical watch industry used to compete on accuracy, but once cheap watches became good, that was over. High-end watches today are strictly status symbols.

      What is so bad about that? All modern watches are very accurate, even the ones you get for $5.00 at Wal-Mart, so that is not a challenge anymore. After all, a watch is one of the few pieces of jewelry a man can wear, so they should look nice. My watch is a Bulova, but not the Accutron, the 97F17, which is (in my opinion) a very nice watch, and was a Christmas present from my Grandmother. Personally, I don't think I would buy a watch that "hummed", I would get annoyed at it rather quickly, although this Accutron with 99 diamonds looks quite nice. Unfortunately, that is out of my price range.

    2. Re:Other Bulova tuning-fork products by Animats · · Score: 2
      All modern watches are very accurate...

      True, although few quartz watches are actually certified to chronometer standards. There's a temperature-insensitivity requirement for certification, and most quartz watches aren't temperature-compensated. (Neither are most computer clock crystals, which is the cause of much computer clock inaccuracy.) Swatch has made some models that go through through chronometer certification, but the testing process costs more than the watch.

      PC clocks really ought to be better than they are. Many PCs have errors of minutes per month, which is way too big.

  21. Re:Cell phones mean no more watches by commodoresloat · · Score: 2

    of course it helps that most cell phones have a clock on them so you can tell time just by looking at your cell phone.

    Me, I still wear my watch, and I don't own a cell phone. I'm still waiting on the cell phone/pda combination that doesn't suck. And doesn't cost $500.

  22. Re:Ironically enough by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
    The Harrison H3 Watch was the most accurate timepiece of its day, but there are several hundred thousand mechanical chronometers made each year that are more accurate.

    When quartz watches first appeared they were more accurate than most mechanical watches. This forced the swiss watchmakers to improve their product and they introduced the 'chronometer' certification.

    For a hefty price you can now buy a mechanical watch that is significantly more accurate than most quartz watches.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  23. my dad was a Swiss watchmaker by theolein · · Score: 2

    and was the distributor of Bulova watches in South Africa. I remember him showing me one of the Accutron Astronaut watches when Bulova started the campaign with posters of the the guys on the Moon along with a Bulova Accutron. Bulova made a special edition for that campaign with a quartz crystal transparent bottom piece. These watches were the holy grail of my fathers company for me and I really revered them. Sadly all these watches were killed by the digital watches with the funny pulsing red LEDs that turned up in the early 70's.

  24. Re:Not a Seamaster by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 2

    The Seamaster is a diver's watch, but some of them are also chronographs. I bought a Seamaster chronograph in 1970 because it was about $180 and the Speedmaster was about $250. It still works fine but it is unpleasantly heavy on the wrist when you are using a keyboard.
    I wanted the speedmaster because it was the "moon watch" but they were hard to find then.
    The best thing about the Accutron was the cool sound they made. My grandfather had one, and I keep looking for one of the early ones.

  25. Re:perspective by BeBoxer · · Score: 2

    I have a $25 Oregon Scientific clock that synchronizes via radio (WWVB, I think) to an atomic clock in... well, in Colorado anyway. (It's very puzzling... some of the atomic clock companies say the atomic clock is in Fort Collins, some say Boulder. I suspect the truth is that they synchronize to WWVB in Fort Collins which, in turn, is controlled by an atomic clock in Boulder.)

    You are correct, the clock is in Boulder and the signal is transmitted from outside Fort Collins. And now you can ditch that old quartz watch, as you can get WWVB-sync'd wrist watches now. I can't imagine the reception is very good, but I'd like to try one.

  26. Acutron remembered by owlmeat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A truly great watch. My dad was a trainman for 33 years and he bought an Acutron in the mid 60's. At the time, it was the only wristwatch that was approved for railroad use. It was one of his most prized possessions. I now have it and it still runs perfectly.

    --
    They stab it with their steely knives,

    But they just can't kill the beast.

  27. I have one by CharlieG · · Score: 2

    I have one, I should have batteries put in, and USE it.

    I got it as a Jr High grad present, of so many years ago. A few years later I actually worked for Bulovia for the summer

    --
    -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  28. Re:perspective by Dahan · · Score: 2

    According to their website, the broadcasted time is from atomic clocks at Fort Collins, which are compared to the reference clock in Boulder. So while I guess the master time comes from Boulder, they do have multiple atomic clocks at the radio station.

  29. Re:Transistor history by unitron · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure which makes me feel older, the ignorance of the past displayed by this post, the ignorance of the past diplayed by whoever moderated it as informative, or the fact that I remember when the Accutron first came out.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.