Lindows.com Hypes An Upcoming $199 PC
prostoalex writes "After having struck a deal with Walmart on $299 PC, Lindows is planning to introduce $199 PC. ExtremeTech has the story, the official message from Michael Robertson, CEO of Lindows, is posted on Lindows.com. Robertson claims that "for under 200 dollars, you'll be able to browse the Internet, check email and run a variety of software products for far less than the price of most handheld devices! A certified version of LindowsOS will come bundled with the PC"." I wonder if such a machine would fare any better than Larry Ellison's ThinkNIC.
You know, i often get sick of seeing this. 199/299 is not the FULL price. There's no freaking monitor included in this system. OK YES -- Its still 199/299 for a box, which for most of us is all we regularly upgrade, but for joe public, A MONITOR IS NECESSARY. "You can browse the web, etc etc /snip/ for $299"
-- no you cant! you need a monitor.
Jesus....what people will write just to get onto /.
When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
Wow! $200USD! That'll be a great reliable system, just like the eMachine I threw in the trash last year!
Seriously, you get what you pay for.
ThinkNOT
Java is the blue pill
Choose the red pill
Damn I was going to make a really cheap pc here from pricewatch....but it came to about 175, so hell 199 is really good, cept itll be a pos and last about 9 months.
In college, really poor, need a flatscreen.
I got my X-Box last week! It runs all my favorite Microsoft software.
Ummm... my SparcStation 4 can do all of this, and I only paid $1.25 for it on eBay!
Imagine a BEOWULF cluster of these!!!
(damn that will save some pennies, and who said you NEED a monitor?)
In his letter, Robertson (CEO of Lindows) comments on their legal battle against Microsoft over the trade name, and asks all of us out in userland to chime in, as they'd
This strikes me as odd - shouldn't it be pretty easy to get copies of not only the documentation, but even the software to which he refers? Is this a real request for information, or merely a request for sympathy?
The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
The lawsuit has already been fought, though I'm not sure where the case stands today.
You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!
The Linux on the X-Box project?
Karma whorin' since 1999
Last I heard the courts were debating whether or not "Windows" was even trademarkable, and Microsoft just kinda backed off after that.
I have a ThinkNIC that myself and several friends bought a year ago to tinker around with. It's actually quite the capable little machine. It runs Linux, comes with a basic TWM based X11 setup, Netscape (with proper plugins, etc), a terminal emulator, and a few other neat little things. It boots off a combination of an NVRAM chip and a CD. The CD they give you is the basic system, but we asked them for some information and they gave us the ISO for that same boot CD. They were even polite about it. We hacked it up a little bit without difficulty, so the machine is slightly configurable.
The downside is that yes, it lacks a harddrive. Personal preferences, like Netscape bookmarks, etc, get stored in the NVRAM, so you don't lose everything. But it's alot like web tv, where you get to surf, use basic email, but don't have the full complications of a complete computer. I admit, I wouldn't use one of them for my home system, but I'd easily give one to my grandmother if she ever changed her mind and decided that the internet was not in some manner connected with Satan.
I am !amused.
I convinced one of my room mates to buy a wal-mart PC with Lindos to ween himself off of Windows. It shows up and it's nearly unusable due to all the crap they did to it. They've got this active installer where they basically sell you the ability to install applications. It really really sucked. He would have been off a ton better just installing the latest SuSE.
The PC died before we could try it though. Took it back to a local wal-mart. Not sure what was wrong with the PC. It got to the point where only the fans came on. No beeps or video or anything and we didn't touch the inside of the box.
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
Public library card. Free book. Paid 10 cents for overdue book. Show library card to librarian, allowed into computer lab. Free T1 internet. And I didn't even have to pay for shipping.
I am !amused.
Ok. Besides the monitor and other issues that other posters have brought up, $199 will not get you what you need to do all that. Lindows comes very stripped down - all as an "incentive" to use the "Click-n-run" warehouse. In Robertson's message, he mentions that it comes with a trial membership.
Trial translates to THREE. You get THREE packages you can install - and if they don't work right on the first install, they still count. See this article for more information. A more accurate price would be $298, as the Click-N-Run membership costs $99.
The xbox would be a better choice to get...costs the same price, and hopefully the linux kernel will be fully working on it soon. Also, it has an excellent video card...the lindows machine probably has a really crappy card. Also, you could even use the xbox with your tv, so you don't really have to pay for a monitor like you do for the lindows pc!
"Ok, your Lindows levice lrivers are not working with your ATA 44.5 HD and Wintellisense chipset... hrm.."
Live web cams
You'll get a better deal locally on the Monitor. The stores get theirs shipped on pallets, much cheaper than one-at-a-time on UPS. You can pay anything you want for a monitor, say $150-1000+ I got my monitors for $20.00 each. ADI MicroScan 4V, at a salvage store. I got lucky. A lindows computer is still Linux, and a "hardware modem" has to be installed, included in the $199 price. The hard drive has to be at least 20GB, so you could install Redhat too if you wanted ;-).
That reminds me. Do you suppose they don't have
a CD ROM drive for $199.00? That Warehouse setup
Lindows has will be a download off the internet deal, not an "install via cd". I have installed
Redhat without an "installed" CD ROM drive, but I have a $50.00 one that I temp-install until not
needed, then I unhook it. The typical user of a
$199.00 box might have only that one machine, however, and no spare cdrom drives, etc. Can't wait to see how they are going to market the $199
box, but looking at Lindows website leads me to believe that they will sell it direct, now thru
Walmart.
Their legal dept is gathering info on the use of the term Windows before 1985 or so. I emailed them just now about the Coleco ADAM, with 8086 processor, than had ADAMCalc, a spreadsheet program, very nice, and no toy, that used Windows. You set up one window where you entered spreadsheet data, and another one down at the total's area. You could set up several. ADAMCalc was very very good for it's day, and considering that it ran on an ADAM, with no hard drive. ADAM's had two tape drives, and a floppy drive, and you could add more RAM. I had about 120K in mine, and had a nice chess game that required more RAM than the stock 80K. Any of you that has any information on the ADAM, might consider emailing the Lindows folks.
They did make about 200,000 ADAMS, and at one time, there was quite a following.
Rapidweather's Linux Screenshots.
But it is upsetting that you are using "facts" out of context knowingly to support a point.
Sheesh, calm down. You make a reasonable point, but look 3 up from the bottom. $77, no rebates. Whoa, $8 more. This Lindows thing might not actually include a monitor, but the point is that it's not out of the question that it might if you used cheap enough components.
Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
Hello Legal, I read your latest Microsoft Corp. v. Lindows.com Update on your web site. You should change your name and try to be a little more creative/original and less cute/clever. I really don't give a rats ass about the future of Microsoft or Lindows. You don't think Coke would sue if someone making soda drinks called there company Loca-Cola. Change your name and get back to work. Best regards, David Brown P.S. Your disclaimer is an admission of guilt, "Lindows.com is not endorsed by or affiliated with Microsoft Corporation in any way." Loose it.
Back in the early 80's the C64 was priced at that point and it sold like hotcakes. If this new machine is marketed correctly, it could sell just as well.
The monitor is a problem though. Maybe they'll figure out some way to output it to a tv....nah
Um, not to sound too trollish, but..
In order to run Linux on your Xbox, not only will you need an existing PC, with dvd-r drive (ok, there's a good $1000 at least), you'll also need an Xbox modchip (tack on another $70 iirc) and the skills to make something like 40 tiny solder connections inside your Xbox. Just a tad more money than $199.
Or has that damn hard drive finally been 'cracked'?
Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
then WTF was I using?
It's been a long time.
Nope, only w2k is bootable.
Nope, Win98 (second edition) boots (and installs) directly from the CD. I ought to know...I've done this with many a client.
You're using her as bait, Master!
Seems to me a significant number of people might upgrade their CPU and keep their existing monitor. I see nothing wrong with pricing this way.
It can be fun to build your own computer, once you know how. It isn't too hard, once you know how. It can be impressive, to those who haven't tried it themselves. I've built quite a few myself, over the years.
But I no longer try do so. Why? Because I can't save money doing so. I keep an eye on prices, and I can't build one for as cheap as my local clone shops. I can't build one as cheap, even if count the value of my labour at $0 per hour. So, I am going to buy a clone next time, at a place where they look clueful.
A friend of mine isn't convinced by this argument. She has started to build computers for her friends. So far she is doing for fun, and love, and is only charging for the parts. (But she thinks she could be making a profit, if she just got her volume up a couple of hundred percent.) And sometimes her buddies bring them back. I am cruel. When she asks for my advice, I tell her. "Just take it back to the manufacturer, and let them worry about it."
Worth noting that while these computers may be "new", they are not really comparable to other new computers. Here in Toronto the slowest new computers are all 1 gigahertz. The computer you pointed uses a motherboard that maxes out at only 800 megahertz. Why is that? It is an old motherboard -- released in June 1999. Is it really fair to call it a "new" computer if it uses such an old motherboard? This motherboard is the old AT form factor version, not an ATX form factor.
Okay, I just did a google search on this motherboard. It got some okay reviews, and some crappy ones. Here is the .pdf version of the manual. FWIW the manual doesn't say a word about mounting a Pentium III. Maybe the ability to mount a socket 370 Celeron implies that? I wouldn't know. I have stuck with AMD processors the last five or six years.