Slashdot Mirror


AOL and .mac IM Not Entirely Integrated

gsfprez writes "While chatting with some Apple employee friends (with .mac accounts and iChat), we were stumped why we couldn't see each other on AIM. It seems that AOL has decided to take the opportunity -- while integrating the .mac users 'into the fold' -- to modify their AIM protocols so that Open Source clients (like Fire and Trillian) can't see those with '@mac.com' IM accounts, and vise versa. Bottom line: you can't be seen by .mac IM users, and they can't see you, unless you get the crufty, single service AOL IM client. The only positive affirmation of this is from the Fire mailing list. 'Into the fold ... sorta' is more like it." Well, it's still early, this may merely be about bugs that need fixing, rather than intent to block .mac users. We'll see.

61 comments

  1. Figures.... by dacarr · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    "A friend of mine told me..." oh, screw it, it's an old joke.

    I will grant that AOHell has made a better variant of an instant messaging system, but you realize that one can just accomplish the same thing using IRC, email, and a biff utility?

    --
    This sig no verb.
  2. for the record.... by tongue · · Score: 2

    Trillian isn't open source. although it is possibly the best IM client out there.

    1. Re:for the record.... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I know it's not really a fair comparison, but iChat is by far the best IM client. Nothing can touch it for sheer elegance and ease of use.

    2. Re:for the record.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh...Since when have YOU used iChat? Do you have some super-secret connexions within Apple to get you 10.2?

    3. Re:for the record.... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Uh...Since when have YOU used iChat? Do you have some super-secret connexions within Apple to get you 10.2?

      Yes. It's the super-secret Developer Program. The one that includes super-secret developer seeds. The last one I got was 6C106, which I've been running full-time ever since I got it. The golden master was 6C115, so this build is pretty close to finished. There's some debugging code in iChat itself that probably got ifdef'd out in the release, but other than that, it's totally release quality.

      In fact, I'm using iChat right this second to converse with some co-workers in Australia. I love it.

    4. Re:for the record.... by dalamcd · · Score: 1
      Nnnh. I can't stand iChat, myself. Those little talky bubbles just don't do it for me. I just use Adium. It does everything I need.
      And if I want to show friends some pictures, I just drag 'em to ~/Sites/ and give out the domain name pointing at my IP. Gotta love OS X. =)

      dalamcd

      --
      moer liek CELtroid prime!!@1!
    5. Re:for the record.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, Jaguar is not hard to get.

      10.2 is being called "The most pirated pre-release of a Mac OS ever". Getting a copy hardly requires "some super-secret connexions".

      Anyone that knows anyone worth knowing has already downloaded it from somewhere...

    6. Re:for the record.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have some super-secret connexions within Apple to get you 10.2?

      No secret, yes connection

    7. Re:for the record.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah...well. Please pardon my arrogance. I had no idea.
      I'm a new mac user, don't quite know the ins and outs of the development community yet (granted, that seems to be quite a big in that I am out of)
      In any case, Sorry for my harshness...it was entirely uncalled for. It's good to hear that you enjoy iChat so much. Makes me even more excited for my layman's release of 10.2!

    8. Re:for the record.... by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      i have also been using ichat. and it sucks. since it is aim only and most of my contacts use icq/msn i use fire. fire isn't all that great either, but I am not stuck using only aim, so...

    9. Re:for the record.... by singularity · · Score: 2

      Actually, I have been using Adium for Mac OS X and have to say that it is the best IM client out there. Clean OS X interface, and written entirely in Cocoa, which means you get the great features that come along with that.

      For anyone running OS X, I would suggest giving it a try.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  3. Older AIM didn't work either. by catwh0re · · Score: 3, Informative

    When I discovered that my friends were on iChat, I immediately downloaded AIM and registered, to my surprise the AIM download link that i was given pointed to a version that was not only out dated, but completely incompatible with .mac users. Selecting "upgrade" from the "My Aim" menu (and some time waiting for the download) i was presented with the ability to chat with my .mac friends.

    1. Re:Older AIM didn't work either. by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      it's important to note that i went to www.aim.com to download the AIM client.

  4. The correct URL for Fire by kearneyj · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:The correct URL for Fire by usr122122121 · · Score: 2

      Drat! Here they were trying to divert the effects of having a link posted on slashdot... and you just HAD TO post the real link! :-)

      --

      -braxton
    2. Re:The correct URL for Fire by kearneyj · · Score: 1
      Come on! What's a good Slashdot story without overloaded links? :-)

      (Of course, in this case Epicware will just get an abnormal amount of 404 errors in their logs...)

    3. Re:The correct URL for Fire by gsfprez · · Score: 2

      how is that any different than the link to Fire in the article?

      --
      guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    4. Re:The correct URL for Fire by pudge · · Score: 2

      You had it ".htm" instead of ".html", dumbass. ;-) I fixed it originally when I edited it, but then started over and forget to re-fix it. Then when I later saw the error, I fixed it again.

  5. Fire v. iChat by cappadocius · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This would seem to create a rather strange schism between OS X'x current reigning IM client, Fire.app, and Apple's new iChat offering.

    Undoubtedly, anyone who depends on running on two or more messenger systems will stick with Fire. Those who use only AIM will probably switch to Apple's offering. But if this is true, then within any circle of friends it has to be one or the other -- Fire (or your fave) or iChat.

    It would be a shame to see Fire die, but with the trend for Macheads to adopt Apple programs, that might very well be what happens.

    [Sigh] Back to running two messenging apps again. :(

    --

    omnia tua castra sunt nobis

    1. Re:Fire v. iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But with iChat, you don't even have to be running the app in order to be logged in and see users. And then the program auto-launches if someone IMs you.

    2. Re:Fire v. iChat by Erdinger · · Score: 5, Informative

      It isn't a matter of using iChat or not, it has to do with the .Mac address. You can use your AIM screen name in iChat and then there would be no problem.

      And yes, I am certain iChat allows you to use your AIM screen name.

    3. Re:Fire v. iChat by foobar104 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And yes, I am certain iChat allows you to use your AIM screen name.

      Not that it's necessary, but I'll second that. I've been using my old-as-the-hills AIM screen name with iChat for some time now to chat both with other iChat users (even over Rendezvous over AirPort, which is really cool) or AIM users on both platforms. Since I had an AIM screen name all along, it seemed unnecessary to use my .Mac user name.

    4. Re:Fire v. iChat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when my .Mac name and my old AIM account are the same? I'm sure a lot of people have this. Will it interfere?

    5. Re:Fire v. iChat by vincent99 · · Score: 1

      .Mac names included the "@mac.com" part.. 'anoncwrd' and 'anoncwrd@mac.com' aren't the same.

      --
      -- V
    6. Re:Fire v. iChat by Erdinger · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, the .Mac name has the "@mac.com" as part of it, so they are recognized as two distinct things. You can use either of them you want.

  6. Why don't you just get a REAL instant messager... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...which will let you talk to whoever you want?

    MSN Messenger is the best IM client anywhere, ever. Quit screwing around with that .mac crap! (BTW, isn't that no longer free?) And stay away from open source--it has too many security holes.

  7. Re:Why don't you just get a REAL instant messager. by sparkleytone · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    lol this guy is so funny...do you ever sleep??

  8. Re:Why don't you just get a REAL instant messager. by foobar104 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I'm not convinced it's one guy. I'll bet is a group of people posting from different time zones around the world.

    He/she/they/whatever* is creative, I'll give 'em that.

    * "On the Internet, no one can tell you're a dog."

  9. Why you can't see .macs by sammy.lost-angel.com · · Score: 4, Informative

    I believe (and I could be wrong) that the reason you don't see .mac people on these clients is because of the protocol they use (the old TOC one). Gaim uses oscar, and I believe you can see people just fine. It probably just hasn't trickled down through TOC, although AOL might choose just to ignore it.

    Anyone have any concrete information on this?

    1. Re:Why you can't see .macs by hoggy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know that Apple specifically say in the help for iChat that AIM users may need to download a newer client in order to see and communicate with .Mac users.

      Certainly the old client I had (4.3) wouldn't even let you type in a .Mac screen name (didn't like the '@' or '.' characters), also iChat couldn't see me online with the old AIM client and couldn't send messages to me.

      Wouldn't surprise me if it's just a bug/version problem.

    2. Re:Why you can't see .macs by Atrus5 · · Score: 1

      Trillian, gaim, and others use oscar, I'm certain of that. AOL hasn't touched TOC since 1996, they did their bit as required by the FCC and have since moved on. If you've looked at the specification it's blindingly obvious that trillian, gaim, and the ohters couldn't do half the things it does if it used TOC. Tik is one of a very small number of AIM clients that uses the TOC protocol.

      Because oscar is a closed protocol, gaim, trillian, and any other unofficial AIM clients that use it have only information from reverse engineering to work with. The diffrences between TOC and oscar are covered well enough in gaim protocol page.

      One of two things probaly happened:
      1) AOL extended the oscar protocol to handle the new charachters
      2) The other clients can't handle the @ and . in screen names

  10. They can be turned off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Err, the bubbles can be turned off...

    1. Re:They can be turned off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How? I looked around quite a bit. Saw nothing.

    2. Re:They can be turned off. by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      How? I looked around quite a bit. Saw nothing.

      Under the "View" menu, you can choose "Show as Text" or "Show as Balloons." Methinks you didn't look around quite as much as you say you did.

    3. Re:They can be turned off. by dalamcd · · Score: 1
      Sadly, I finally found this roughly 3 minutes after posting.

      Silly me for looking in the preferences. =P

      Still, I'd rather use Adium. The bubbles were just one example. (The window modes of Adium are another, if someone actually cares.)

      dalamcd

      --
      moer liek CELtroid prime!!@1!
  11. It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing by CyberMonk · · Score: 1

    Noipe, folks, this is AOL trying to get rid of the clients which they're jealous of, because, yes, third party clients [minus Apple's iChat] are MUCH nicer than AOL's poor excuse for an instant messenging application. I use Proteus, for both ICQ and AIM, so that I don't need to keep multiple apps open. Too bad AOL seems gung-ho about preventing these fine application from being put properly to use.

    --
    I live, I learn, and yet, I yearn for more. -CyberMonk
    1. Re:It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing by bmetzler · · Score: 2, Funny
      Too bad AOL seems gung-ho about preventing these fine application from being put properly to use.

      You mean from stealing AOL's resources, right? If AOL wants to only let their clients, or licensed clients connect, then they should be able to do so. It's their resources after all. If Trillian wants to be compatible, they should step up to the plate and talk to AOL, just like Apple did. If AOL declines, well, this is a free country and you can do business with whoever you want.

      -Brent
    2. Re:It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing by ScooterComputer · · Score: 1
      Who the fuck is stealing? The makers of the clients? No...the USERS of those clients. And if I go and sign up for an AOL Instant Messenger account (which I HAVE to do to logon), then what does it matter what client I use? I don't remember there being any thing that said I HAD to use their client. This is as much horseshit as that "If you watch TV, you have to watch our commercials" garbage.

      Furthermore, what was AOL's goal here? My personal info or being gracious and giving me that POS sotware? My info...they got it, either way.

      --
      Scott
      "Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
    3. Re:It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing by bmetzler · · Score: 2
      My info...they got it, either way.

      Nah, when they asked for your personal information, you probably lied and said, "Bill Gates, 1 Redmond Way".

      -Brent
    4. Re:It's Not a Bug Needing Fixing by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      is your 3rd party client passing the ads that AIM displays? AOL has a good reason for not wanting users to use 3rd party clients!

      i mean it is a sucky reason, but a reason nonetheless.

  12. Re:Why don't you just get a REAL instant messager. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its called a telephone.
    Invented in the 20th century.

    It has never crashed.

  13. Re:Why don't you just get a REAL instant messager. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmm, must be cheaper for M$ to hire astrotufers internationally

  14. Proteus by bootc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The other day I signed on to my AIM account using Proteus and a new contact was magically added to my buddies list: "PleaseUpgrade000". That sort of told me that I had to give up on Proteus.

    Just to add more to the discussion, I remember that even AIM had to be upgraded to work with or see Mac.com buddies, so it's just that the others haven't caught up yet.

    1. Re:Proteus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrmm, didn't happen to Proteus here. You are using a 2.0 release of Proteus, right?

  15. Distributed IM service by bmetzler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This may finally allow AOL to license their servers to over companies and have their own @company.com clients that interoperate. Perhaps Microsoft needs to talk to AOL about licensing again. And Yahoo. and whoever else wants to offer a specialised IM client. I want my bmetzler@yahoo.com AIM ID. That'd be cool.

    -Brent

  16. What about Adium?? by terevos · · Score: 1

    All this talk about Fire. What about the real best IM client for OS X out there? Adium! (http://adiumx.com/) it rocks. Try it out. I'm using Jaguar right now, and I don't use iChat, I use Adium. It's way better.

    Anyways.. enough of the rant on Adium vs... I wish that AOL would just open its doors. It's not like it's going to loose business here. All the AOL users still use AOL for their messaging, and I imagine that's where they get a whole lot of their money from. The banner ads on AIM can't provide that much for them. Am I wrong?

    1. Re:What about Adium?? by jlower · · Score: 2

      But Adium only does AIM, right? I want all four services running at once and Fire does a pretty nice job at that. If I want Yahoo Webcam or one of the special features the 'real' client provide, I log off that service in Fire and launch the authorized app. This happens very seldom - most of the time Fire is fine.

  17. Wait, wait.... by Valdrax · · Score: 2

    Do you have to keep a .mac account to use iChat? Oh, just great. Just when I thought I'd get an instant messaging client, I find out it costs $100 a year to use. Forget that.

    I think I'll stick with ignoring my email instead of moving to ignoring my instant messages.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Wait, wait.... by artels · · Score: 0

      You can use any AOL AIM nick with iChat.

    2. Re:Wait, wait.... by Valdrax · · Score: 2

      Oh, thank goodness. That's was the impression that I already had before this article started referring to iChat users as ".mac accounts."

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  18. Re:Why don't you just get a REAL instant messager. by DeanT · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It has never crashed.
    Not strictly true. AT&T had a failure in 1990 due to a C programming bug.

    DeanT

  19. Re:What about Adium?? A Technical Answer by Erchamion · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, if you download the source to Adium you'd know that it uses the open source "FireTalk" library which the article says will be an incompatible protocol. Therefore, Fire and Adium are in the same boat if they both use the same library.

  20. Jabber IM? by benad · · Score: 1
    IIRC, Jabber IM allows you to have your own IM server, free and open-source. Your ID is something like "user@server.com", making the system effectively distributed. Also, it can interoperate with AIM (well, on the old TOC protocol).

    http://www.jabber.org/

    - Benad

  21. iChat vs. AIM Direct IM issue by Duck_Taffy · · Score: 1

    I've been having some rather interesting experiences with AIM and iChat. I've been using iChat for a couple of months now, and when I do a direct-IM connection with people using certain versions of AIM for Windows, I can send them images just fine, but if they try to send me anything, I just get a pink box. The box is the size of the image they're trying to send, but it never displays the image. Oddly, older versions of AIM don't do this, only the current one. Then I'm forced to use AIM, but the problem is that even if I quit iChat, and they try to direct connect while I'm on AIM, an iChat window opens up, since AIM apparently uses the iChat Agent. The only workaround for this is for me to direct connect to them in AIM. Sometimes when they try to direct connect to me in AIM, the dialogue asking me if I want to connect comes up but goes away immediately. Also, if someone sends me a message while I have AIM's preferences open, the preferences window goes away, and the application behaves really strangely.

    I know this is mostly unrelated, but it is still weird iChat/AIM interaction.

    --
    Karma: Ran over your dogma.
  22. The only real IM by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    Is ICQ....I know it is AOl, but it kept it's own identity. The only IM I allow on my home network is ICQ. AOL, MS Messenger and anything else is blocked. I'm sorry, but ICQ has all anyone would ever need, and the ICQ number is way superior to any buddy-based list. Heck, didn't they get Databases 101: you do not use a name as Primary Key! Damnit. ICQ is the way to go, yes, it is AOL, yes it has ads on the Windows version and, yes, most people use AIM. And I love it on my iBook...no ads, just everything I need. Why ask for more?

    1. Re:The only real IM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they forgot Databases 202, which you evidently never took.

      Never show the user the primary key.

    2. Re:The only real IM by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Point taken... (I took Db 202 and 303, noone ever told me not to show the primary key to the user: just that they shouldn't manipulate it directly.)
      However think of it as a phone number, not as a primary key. Your phone number is after all a primary key too. Besides, most people don't know their ICQ#. Well I for sure don't and I only have a 7-digit ICQ number.

  23. Storm, meet teacup. by carlfish · · Score: 2

    Originally, AIM users were all AOL accounts. Now, AIM users are either AOL accounts or .Mac accounts. The system had to be changed to cater for this. No conspiracies, no black helicopters, just the standard lag you'll get if you're using a reverse-engineered client instead of the official one.

    This isn't the death of Fire, or Trillian any more than all the other changes to Oscar were. The third-party clients will reverse-engineer the changed protocol within a week, Trillian users will download (yet another copy of) aim.dll, and we'll all be happy again. Meanwhile, the idea that AOL would force-upgrade all of its legitimate users just to annoy Trillian users for a week is pretty ludicrous.

    --
    The more I learn about the Internet, the more amazed I am that it works at all.