Slashdot Mirror


Netscape 7.0 is Out

MrJones was one of many many users to submit that Netscape has released Navigator 7.0 unto the world. With their dwindling market share, it'll be interesting to see what affect this has on internet users. But here's hoping it makes a dent.

13 of 614 comments (clear)

  1. Yes, but ... by nbvb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But where is the platform support?

    Some of us have SPARCs on our desk. Or PA-RISC machines. Or RS6k's.

    These were all supported with Communicator ...

    NS7 is useless to me till I can run it on these platforms...

    --NBVB

  2. Re:What's the difference between it and Mozilla? by (startx) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the difference is AOL. Netscape == mozilla + aol cruft - nifty pop-up blocking features. Plus netscape has the brand name appeal.

  3. Steroptypical response by Roadmaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Um, so what, Netscape is dead, use mozilla"

    "yeah, big deal, it's based on Mozilla 1.0 when the Mozilla Organization just released 1.1, kudos to Netscape's already outdated browser".

    Yes, but a lot of the time it's easier to:

    1- have users download the familiar Netscape product instead of "that mozilla dinosaur thingy".

    2- Introduce Netscape to organizations; at least it's a familiar name and brand for them.

    I'm a rabid mozilla user, but still I'm pleased to see that Netscape is still alive, if maybe under AOL's life support infrastructure.

  4. AOL AOL AOL by exhilaration · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Wasn't AOL supposed to be phasing out Internet Explorer in favor of Netscape?

    Think of what might happen if the gazillions of AOL users started using Netscape when they upgrade to the next version of AOL!!!!!

    AOL has the power to change the browser demographics of the web.

    1. Re:AOL AOL AOL by trifster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      this needs to be modded higher. This is a key point. Once Netscape gets put on CD's by ISPs ESPICALLY Aol watch that market share dwindle. As sorry as it is we need a monopoly to beat a monopoly.

  5. Re:6, 6.1, 7? by Salsaman · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think the numbering change was partly for marketing reasons, and partly because this is the first release based on mozilla 1.0.

    Netscape 6 was based on mozilla 0.9.4 which is pretty old now.

  6. Netscape popularity a problem for webmasters ? by theefer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm really amazed to see the popularity of Netscape, especially version 4.* and especially for the "newbie internet users". The fact is, ISP often offer a free CD containing MS IE5 and NN4.7. Right.

    I was a NN user two years ago, when I had no alternative. Today, let's face it : NN4.* is crap. I mean IE is not the best browser for specs compliance, and crashes quite often. But NN4.* doesn't even support CSS1, which is really a shame if we plan to use HTML4.01 Strict. Opera is quite a good, rapid, nice browser, but since the free version has a banner and since it's not on the ISP CDs, it will never make it amongst beginners.

    [ right, you'll have noticed that I only speak about windows, since any normal linux user will use a recent Mozilla (or galeon & co) or Konqueror. I'm talking about people who don't even know what a setup.exe is. ]

    So the problem is : I've never seen any ISP shipping its CD with a NN >4 browser. Since NN6 is such a sloooow program, it's not much of a surprise, I agree. We'll see what NN7 will change in this business.

    However, the fact is : many internet users are beginners, and many beginners use the browser they were given in the first place (IE5 or NN, maybe they prefer NN because of its mail client which is less effective in virus auto-install). What's wrong with that ?

    NN4 *is* deprecated. I mean it doesn't support recent standards. So if you are a webmaster, and that you or your customers want the majority of the people to be able to view your website, you have no choice but make your HTML code NN4 compliant. And to some extent, recent-standards-non-compliant.

    I wouldn't be whinning about that here if my customer didn't make me recode his website to make it NN4 compliant (wow, great creepy code with tables, frames, and all).

    A solution would be for the ISP to *stop* distributing this old NN version with their CDs. Mozilla is mature enough to replace it, isn't it ? Or even a recent NN version ...

    Let's hope ISP will wake up, eventually, and update their CDs so that we'll finally be able to use the new possibilities the W3C has been working on for two years ...

    --
    theefer
  7. Re:Please, AOLTW, switch to NS from IE for AOL.. by Wonko42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree that Netscape/Mozilla has reached a point where it could easily replace IE as a browser of choice. However, my guess is that AOL's reasoning is that many sites still treat *all* versions of Netscape as if they were inferior to IE. A good number of online banking and credit card websites (CapitalOne, for instance) won't even let you log into your account unless you're using IE. This would result in AOL getting tons of calls from clueless users.

  8. Shouldn't do that by Salsaman · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I know it's tempting and sometimes necessary to change the browser string, but in the end it's counter-productive. It just lowers the apparent percentage of mozilla users on the net, and provides less of an incentive for websites to accomodate mozilla.

    If you must do it, the least you could do is email the site and let them know they are losing potential customers. At least then there is a chance that they will fix the markup and so next mozilla user to come along won't have to change their UA string.

  9. Re:Netscapes Market Share Down to 3.4% by caluml · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft's rival browser, Internet Explorer, by contrast, has an estimated 96% of the market...

    because everyone sets their browser ident to IE...

    because everyone thinks that IE is all anyone uses...

    because everyone sets their browser ident to IE...

    because everyone thinks that IE is all anyone uses...

    For Gods sake, people, don't set Konq/Moz/Opera to say it's IE, or we'll never get a true picture. And, if a site doesn't let you in as your true self, don't go to the site, and send them an email telling them that you didn't.

  10. Re:CNet Review - "Don't switch browsers" by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I haven't seen an example of how it "Displays AOL ads everywhere" as mentioned in the CNET review. I wonder if CNET and I downloaded and installed the same software.

    As posted here on slashdot, there is a way to disable pop-ups. Sounds like CNET had a bone to pick.

    --
    Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
  11. Can we harass the CapitalOne's??? by JohnDenver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe we need a website with a database devoted entirely to giving websites like CapitalOne a hard time for being IE only.

    Does such a website exist? Maybe if we got together we could email these people and thier bosses to get them to support Netscape.

    Does such a website exist?

    --
    "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
  12. Bankers Irony by freerangegeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given the raft of security bugs surrounding IE and forged certs, isn't it kind of dangerous to do your banking on IE? Wouldn't Mozilla or Konqueror be a safer choice?