Slashdot Mirror


Faith Returns to Buffy

duffbeer writes "According to an article at Yahoo!, Eliza Dushku will be in the upcoming Buffy season 7! Five episodes are scheduled, along with three over on Angel. Now starting the oft-mentioned space-cowboy-thriller Firefly on Fox, I wonder if Joss have enough juice left over to invent plots for Faith as entertaining as those in the past?" Since the Slayer line has to continue through Faith, and since Gellar wants to leave the show after season 7, there is much interesting plot potential with Faith's return.

251 comments

  1. Re:and this qualifies as news? by siskbc · · Score: 0, Troll

    Makes me think one of the editors let his girlfriend have article approval privileges...

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  2. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by Zinereem · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look, we *have* to keep watching inane, mindless televison, or else the terrorists have already won!

  3. I'd just like to say: by Mononoke · · Score: 3, Funny
    Eliza Dushku can kick my ass anytime.

    Please.

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    1. Re:I'd just like to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      word.

    2. Re:I'd just like to say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true dat.

  4. Re:and this qualifies as news? by EvilDonut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is also News for Nerds, and Buffy has quite a following in that demographic. Besides, if you don't want news about tv-shows, disable the damn category in your preferences. It's not like it's hard or anything.

  5. woohoo by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

    always refreshing when taco posts about buffy. good to know I'm not alone in my fanaticism.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    1. Re:woohoo by krow · · Score: 2

      Hardly....

      --
      You can't grep a dead tree.
  6. Re:and this qualifies as news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wanted to write more or less the same. Thanks.
    Completely agreed. I mean, what has slashdot become? A anime-movie-news-site? Fuck it hey! I want tech-news, esp. from the fs/os area!

  7. Taco, aren't you a married man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taco, aren't you a married man? What if your wife saw you drooling over some young starlet? What if your kids were to pull out this post 10 years from now? Shame on you!

    1. Re:Taco, aren't you a married man? by siskbc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Come on, you know his wife posted that. How many "men" watch buffy for Chrissake?

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    2. Re:Taco, aren't you a married man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me!

    3. Re:Taco, aren't you a married man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faggoty slashbots don't count as men.

      Even my two gay friends don't watch Buffy.

    4. Re:Taco, aren't you a married man? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      The show is actualy a decent show if you sit down and watch it for a bit. It has very nice SFX and well choreographed fight sequences for a TV series, and it's more entertaining than some of the other stuff out there. And besides, it's got some of the best quotes ever. It is a highly quoteable show

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    5. Re:Taco, aren't you a married man? by Casualposter · · Score: 1

      Maried, w/kids. Whole Family watches buffy. Got Buffy on DVD.

      --
      Creative Spelling Copyright (2002). May use without Persimmons
  8. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by Mononoke · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    The souls of the victims are watching in horror as you people squander your finite, precious time on this earth playing video games!
    The souls of the victims are watching in horror as you squander your finite, precious time posting to Slashdot!

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  9. Obligatory AOL ME TOO!! by waspleg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I thought I had been redirected to tvguide.com or something for a minute.. yes buffy posts are lame, in fact one can regularly read other sites (linuxtoday.com seems to be a major one) and predictably guess which stories will be on slashdot within several hours.. i read that venezuelan gov't post from yesterday the day before on linuxtoday and that is one small example..

    buffy sucks, the movie sucked, the WB is the sole reason for the downfall of America

    and no I don't care if I burn mod points either, I love how everyone screams about their rights on here but as soon as you're disagreed with people waste no time dropping mod points on you like you were hiroshima

    1. Re:Obligatory AOL ME TOO!! by fingerbear · · Score: 1

      buffy sucks, the movie sucked, the WB is the sole reason for the downfall of America

      Umm... Buffy's on UPN now.

    2. Re:Obligatory AOL ME TOO!! by Sancho · · Score: 2

      One thing I've never been able to understand is how Buffy can provoke such a negative response from people here. Your quote: "buffy sucks, the movie sucked, the WB is the sole reason for the downfall of America" is tame compared to some of the flaming that goes on when someone even suggests that they might enjoy Buffy.

      As for rights vs mod points... well Slashdot isn't a democracy. Slashdot doesn't claim to let you say anything you want. The moderation system itself should tell you that....

  10. bwahahahaha.. by fadeaway · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Sorry.. *cough*.. haha.. I just thought I heard someone use the words "Buffy" and "plot" in the same sentance.. followed by the word "interesting". Haha.. oh.. shit.

    1. Re:bwahahahaha.. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yep. Buffy definitely has plots. Plot arcs, even. The fate of Willow becomming a possible Vengence daemon spanned just over a whole season. Usually, in any given episode, there are actually two parallel plots -- One dramatic, and one comedic. (e.g. in one episode where Spike, being non-human, is the only one to realize that two characters (one good and one evil) are actually alter-egos of each other.)

      When I originally heard about buffy, I decided to pass on it. Although I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, I considered it 'bubble-gum'. I figured that, as a TV series, it would be pretty vacuous. When I finally got around to watching it, I found that it was hilarious. It is now one of only two TV series that I watch regularly (the other being Enterprise*).

      In any case, I wrote up a defence of Buffy some time ago (which was printed in a local SF mag).
      I also have Slashdot Journal entry about how Buffy's biggest problem in running for Emmys is that they're going for the drama prizes when they should competing in the comedy category.

      *(for those of you just waiting for me to comit blasphemy, I've come to like the theme to Enterprise, and have gone to the trouble of transcribing and memorizing it... If you pay attention, it's basically a musical version of the 'where no-one has gone before' monologue.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    2. Re:bwahahahaha.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you misspelled 'commit'.

      hope this helps.

    3. Re:bwahahahaha.. by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2

      like you i was late coming to watch buffy. the movie was good, but a tv series would be lame, right? wrong. however plot lines are longer then a season. the willow being overwhelmed by magic was developed since around season one or two. willow becoming a vengance daemon showed up first mid-season 4 - so it was over two years in the making for the end of season 6.

      that's the frustrating thing about joss. we probably have a ton of clues as to what will happen in season 7. for instance the thread about giles leaving also first showed up in season 4 - note the song he plays in a late season 4 episode.

      buffy's like a long mystery novel that no matter how much i'd like to, i can't flip to the end. :)

      --
      US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    4. Re:bwahahahaha.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I don't mind the Enterprise theme (I kind of like it actually), but I don't see this musical "where no one has gone before" thing happening. The song isn't even written for the series. It originated from the "Patch Adams" soundtrack.

  11. Re:and this qualifies as news? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

    You're right, but I want to hear stories about Star Trek and Firefly, and any other interesting show that might be on television. Is there any way to disable the "non-geek-uninteresting-tvshow-boring-news" catergory? Of course not. And besides, whether or not I can see the story about buffy, it's still a sign that slashdot's quality is waning.

  12. Its sunday by thesupermikey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Its sunday everyone. Like you have anything better to do then bitch about Buffy.

    --
    Mikey
    I've always been the kinda guy to fall for the girl dressed like an eskimo.
    1. Re:Its sunday by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      Why, that is exactly why we're all here, bitching about Buffy.

  13. Re:and this qualifies as news? by roach2002 · · Score: 1

    There are some TV show posts I want to see. ones with technical issues, like discussing the tech of CSI or the special effects on other shows.

    but i'd still be annoyed if slashdot posted that the secondary character on CSI was leaving or returning.

    I come to slash for tech/sci/geek appropriate information. The geek appropriate information is a stretch here.

  14. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Yes, I agree! Cowboyneal, start stocking the underground bomb shelter, taco and I need to start chopping firewood for the coming nuclear winter!

    Remember, dying early means not having enough time to pray to get into heaven, kids. Have mommy and daddy start buying canned goods and camping equipment today!

  15. buffy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    buffy sucks

    i cannot eject all possible bilious commentary
    that would be true. suffice it to say that buffy
    sucks, and most buffy fans suck.

    buffy

    Sucks

  16. A pleasent looking young lady by puckhead · · Score: 1

    Having never seen this Buffy show that you speak of I had to do some research. I discovered that Eliza Dushku is an attractive woman.

    --
    Watching Cowboy Bebop in my jammies, eating a bowl of Shreddies.
    1. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by Peale · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Jeeze! I had forgotten all about this movie.

    2. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

      *drool*
      Which movie is that?

      Does she appear naked somewhere?

      --
      Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
      Nave H. Weiss
    3. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2
      I discovered that Eliza Dushku is an attractive woman [drunkoffourass.com].

      Pretty much have to be. Playing a Vampire Slayer is pretty physical. By the time you work your body into a shape that can handle the stunts, you're pretty much guaranteed to be in nice shape.

      (personally, I always thought that Tara (Amber Benson) was the babe of the Buffy series).

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    4. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by gnugnugnu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does she get naked! not likely.
      checkout CNDB.com the Celebrity Nudity Database (the whole concept of which makes me laugh).

      It was really weird when i realised that it was Eliza Dushku who played the daughter in True Lies.

      "Bring it on"
      a light hearted amusing movie about cheerleading
      also features Kirsten Dunst and the one who played Glory in Buffy.

      Im just another Teenage fanboy!

      Mmm Kirsten Dunst in "get over it" pointless and gratuitous scene just so that we get to see her at the pool in a bikini.
      Mmm Kirsten Dunst in Spiderman, unecessary rain and a tight dress ... thanks Sam Raimi ;)

    5. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're insane. They hire stunt women for that show. No one wants to risk having Sarah snap in half when she suddenly turns around. Those actresses are not "in shape", they're deathly skinny.

      Somehow the homosexual lobby has transformed healthy heterosexual love of normal women into lust for skinny boy-girls, that the homo lobby hopes will 'convert' normal people to lust for boys. There's not much difference between SMG and a boy anyways.

    6. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word

    7. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by bmajik · · Score: 2

      Yeah. She is totally delicious. I "discovered" her after my wife convinced me to watch "Bring it On".

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    8. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by Sethb · · Score: 2

      Hmm, I've got to go with Emma Caulfield, personally, though maybe it's a toss-up between her and Eliza...

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
    9. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think there's not much difference between SMG and a boy, then you are a homo.

    10. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey there!

      Thank you for linking to Amber Benson's site - Thanks all the more for supporting her.

      (Hi to Chris if he's lurking...)

      Little Willow
      http://www.slayground.net
      http://www.rock therock.com

    11. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by extrasolar · · Score: 2

      Well, duh.

      Every major character in a primetime show these days, especially women, are "pleasent looking young ladies". That's the point.

      These people make money off of their looks. And, what, did you think Buffy was such a popular show because of its excellent writing?

      Thats just the way television works.

    12. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Jeeze! I had forgotten all about this movie

      She kind of looks like this cleavagey slut-bomb walking around going "oh check me out, I'm wicked cool, I'm five by five."

    13. Re:A pleasent looking young lady by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Personally, I always liked Alyson Hannigan.

      Although I freely admit I do prefer redheads... (g)
      .

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  17. Eliza Dushku by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

    I've seen her in 3 different movies/TV shows and never understood why she always looked so familiar.. until I checked her name in IMDB. Besides of Faith, She was Schwartz' daughter in True Lies and Missy in JayAndSilentBobStrikeBack (sucky movie, btw.. Clerks and Chasing Amy were much better).

    Is she single?

    --
    Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
    Nave H. Weiss
    1. Re:Eliza Dushku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is she single?

      Yes, and I hear she's attracted to fat, ugly, pear-shaped, acne-faced, loser nerds who've never been on a date, so go for it.

  18. African Slayer was better by MCRocker · · Score: 1
    1. I know it's been said before, but...So What?
    2. Besides the original replacement slayer from Africa was MUCH more interesting than that snotty Faith character.
    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
    1. Re:African Slayer was better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The African slayer was horrible.
      She had the most horrible accent ever created and she looked nowhere near as hot it leather pants!

    2. Re:African Slayer was better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kendra was so much better than Faith. Smart, sexy and a heck of a slayer. Faith was a wimp. Wah wah, I want to be bad guy because I can't handle being responsible.

    3. Re:African Slayer was better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was from Jamaica, mon. And yes, she was better in every way, and sure made my "Mr. Pointy" take notice.

    4. Re:African Slayer was better by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      i dont get it, why isn;t there a 3rd slayer now?, buffy did die last season, right?

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    5. Re:African Slayer was better by bnenning · · Score: 5, Funny
      why isn;t there a 3rd slayer now?, buffy did die last season, right?


      The death-trigger only works once. Buffy has already died at the end of the 1st season (thereby summoning Kendra), so nothing happened when she died again.


      It's like how a Java object gets garbage collected; you can resurrect it in its finalize() method, but when it's garbage collected again later finalize() won't be called a second time.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    6. Re:African Slayer was better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buffy died at the end of season 5 and was brought back by Willow & Co. in the first ep of season 6.

      At the start of season 1 Buffy was the only slayer. In the last ep of season 1 she was killed by the Master, but she was only dead for a minute.

      Although Buffy was revived, Kendra was called as the next slayer. Kendra didn't last very long and was killed by Drusilla. When Kendra died Faith was called as Kendra's replacement.

      When/whenever Buffy dies, no new slayer will be called. When Faith dies a new slayer will be called.

    7. Re:African Slayer was better by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1

      African?
      I would have sworn Kendra was Afro-Carribean.
      That was a carribean accent she was attempting right?

  19. Re:News about Buffy the Vampire Slayer ... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Another step"? So they're 15miles and 2 feet away, not just 15miles?

    fuck.

  20. Preferences by jman11 · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    Well done /. yet another category I have remove to avoid stupid shit.

  21. What's going to happen. by Peale · · Score: 1

    ...since Gellar wants to leave the show after season 7, there is much interesting plot potential with Faith's return.

    Yep! Since Little sis is going to take over the family business. Or something.

    1. Re:What's going to happen. by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Yep! Since Little sis is going to take over the family business. Or something.

      Except that Dawn doesn't have any superpowers. Is she going to braid the demons' hair to death? Although, if she doesn't have Buffy's strange aversion to guns, I suppose she could just shoot them.

    2. Re:What's going to happen. by Peale · · Score: 2

      Except that Dawn doesn't have any superpowers. Is she going to braid the demons' hair to death? Although, if she doesn't have Buffy's strange aversion to guns, I suppose she could just shoot them.

      You think that Buffy and all the other Slayers called before her had their powers all their life? No, the power comes when the previous Slayer falls. I'm guessing that Faith will die, and Little sis gets the gig. But then, we can't call it 'Buffy The Vampire Slayer' anymore.

  22. Carisma Carpender! by jonr · · Score: 1

    Now that would be a reason to watch Buffy again!

    1. Re:Carisma Carpender! by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1
      Carisma Carpender!

      wow, you must be a really big fan of Charisma Carpenter !

    2. Re:Carisma Carpender! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [spelling nazi]
      Or even Charisma Carpenter!
      [/spelling nazi]

  23. I want to stab Buffy. by j1mmy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    With my penis.

    1. Re:I want to stab Buffy. by paladin_tom · · Score: 2

      If you had said "Faith" instead of "Buffy", your post would not have been Offtopic. Interesting, perhaps. And it certainly wouldn't be Overrated.

      Please pay attention to such details in your future posts.

      --
      #define sig "Every social system runs on the people's belief in it."
  24. I totally agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I don't find BTVS at all interesting, or entertaining.

    In any case, though, this whole thing is off-topic, as it's not news for nerds, and it is stuff that doesn't matter.

  25. potential? by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They have to do something. Since the move to UPN, something has been different. Buffy has gone the way of most sitcoms in that unless you have seen 3 of the 5 most recent episodes, the storyline is lost. Buffy used have stand alone episodes - each was fun, "light", and had both a beginning and an end. Lately, ever since Glorificus, it has been impossible to watch episodes out of order. The Buffy character seems to have been written into a corner, and even the introduction of the 3 arch nemisises (this is the slashdot tie-in) and their subsequent disposal has not been able break the cyclic decline into soap operadom. Maybe, if Faith kills everyone and becomes the dark slayer, we can return to the stand alone episodes of the early days and leave behind political statments and ratings whoring of the lesbian duo. I just wish they would do another musical episode. Once More, With Feeling is my favorite by far. My $.02 - and remember, an opinion is never worth more than you paid for it.

    --
    Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    1. Re:potential? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG?!?! You've just discovered plot!!

      Now go and watch some anime, and realise just how dreadful plotless American TV really is.

    2. Re:potential? by Sethb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bite your friggin' tongue. The thing I like most about Buffy is that there IS continuity. They make one-line references to things that happened 3 seasons ago, and foreshadow things that will happen 4 episodes from now. That's what makes the show intelligent, plot arcs.

      I feel like I'm having the debate about which is better, Star Trek: TNG, or Deep Space Nine. For stand-alone episodes, TNG wins hands-down, "The Inner Light" and "Best of Both Worlds" clinch it alone. But, for plot lines, intrigue, and suspense sustained over an entire season, Deep Space Nine wins easily. I'm not going to claim that either series was better than the other, though I'll give ST:TNG credit for fueling a renewed interest in Star Trek in a younger generation.

      It's all about what kind of TV you want to watch, if you like being able to watch TV episodes in any order, and having the characters live inside a bubble in which they never reference anything that happened in the past, that's fine, it's your choice. But for people who are really fans of a show, it's a much more rewarding viewing experience to know that each episode is only one part of a larger picture.

      I also appreciate that (apart from Vampires, Demons, etc.) Buffy is one of the most realistic shows on TV when it comes to human intereactions. I'm not some hard core Buffy disciple either, I just started watching it this summer when a co-worker convinced me to sic my TiVo on it when FX started showing it from the beginning. For what I mean by realism, watch the episode where Buffy goes to college, and the little things that she and her roomie do to get back at each other.

      And, Buffy scores one more point with me for making frequent references to movies and pop culture, especially when Xander does it. Roger Ebert wrote, in his review of Jay & Silent Bob, that it always feels so strange when you watch a movie or TV show in which the characters have apparently never seen a movie or TV show, and they never reference it. Next time you're out with your friends, see how many pop culture references you make to movies or TV shows, then notice how few movies or shows will ever include a reference to another show, it just feels weird. A good example of this was when Buffy and some college guys were turned into cave-people by some tainted beer, Xander said they were out "Questing for Fire", which got a good snicker out of me. :)

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
    3. Re:potential? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      A good example of this was when Buffy and some college guys were turned into cave-people by some tainted beer, Xander said they were out "Questing for Fire", which got a good snicker out of me.

      "And we've got maybe seconds before Darth Rosenberg grinds everybody into Jawa burgers and not one of you bunch has the midiclorians to stop her!"

    4. Re:potential? by acecccp · · Score: 1

      That's what makes the show intelligent>

      Intelligent?!

  26. Re:and this qualifies as news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! Don't criticise Anime, I think BTVS is rubbish, but Anime is a lot more entertaining than, "Oooww, I'm so excited, I've just bought a faster CPU, or saying that Microsoft did something wrong. REALLY? Wow, like I couldn't have predicted THAT was going to happen.

  27. Definatly news for Nerds. by EvilBastard · · Score: 4, Informative

    Find a show on TV today showing a better role model for the 'nerds' of the generation, even without getting into the whole gay/bisexual nerds can be important also subplot.

    Take the quiet kid at school, bit of an outsider, not liked by anyone except an old male friend. In her spare time, she browses the town's computers systems, and has 'Accidentally' broken into pretty much every computer in the town [1]

    Then a superhero turns up, saves her life and gives her some direction and a new sense of priorities. She begins spreading further and wider, meets up with another nerd crossing old tech and new tech, picks up on that and forges a valuable weapon in the defense of the world (althout she did accidentally releases a self-multiplying daemon onto the internet, a bit like Robert Morris, Jr did [2]). She even ends up teaching some classes in Highschool to people her own age[3].

    She gets offered a job at the worlds largest software manufacturer [4], and pretty much every university in the world [5] but turns it down to fight evil instead. When the highschool is threatened, the athletic and the popular kids turn to her as one of the few people who can help [6].

    Arriving in College, still the outsider, she still wanders around before finally discovering that there are other people like her, and when they get together there is practically nothing they cannot do [7] including giving her the power to attack a God [8], take over as the leader of the team that defends Earth from Hell for six months [9], and when her lover is killed she decides to destroy the entire world to save everyone from the pain of living[10]

    If that's not a path to base your entire life on, I don't know what is. Also, she's the only person to ever have a iMac laptop upgraded with the telepathic optional kit, making it actually useful.

    Personally, I hope that SMG does quit so they can have the Scooby Gang series : Willow, Xander, Giles and Dawn. Other people won't agree with me, but there's more stories to work with if they have to remake the Slayer out of her clone with Faith's Assistance, then by continuing with Buffy

    (In case you were keeping count:
    [1] Welcome to the Hellmouth
    [2] I Robot, You Jane
    [3] Passion
    [4] What's My Line
    [5] Choices
    [6] Graduation Day
    [7] Hush
    [8] Tough Love
    [9] Barganing
    [10] Grave)

    1. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 0

      Most excellent analysis. I love all the decryption stuff.

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    2. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by thesupermikey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *claps hands*
      everybody together!!!

      WILLOW!!!
      WILLOW!!!
      WILLOW!!!

      --
      Mikey
      I've always been the kinda guy to fall for the girl dressed like an eskimo.
    3. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh God, be quiet you sad bastard. Buffy the Vampire Slayer is easily the most overrated show of all time. It's Beverly Hills 90210 with vampires and demons... it's no deeper than that. "Ohh... it's about the difficulty of puberty and the adult world... and it represents them using demons! How marvellous!" No, it's a show about attractive teenagers - it is, at best, a well choreagraphed fighting show with some decent stunts - and, at worst, crudely written wank material for lonely nerds.

      Get a fucking life, and Taco too.

    4. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying that BTVS is crudely written just goes to show your are either and idiot or have never actually watched the show.

    5. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by Afrosheen · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Oh man, where are my mod points today...this has to be one of the most insightful posts I've read today.

    6. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Buffy the Vampire Slayer is only well-written if you have gorged yourself on a diet of shite soap operas and crappy teen shows. Stop deluding yourself: take a look at some quality writing (Frasier, for example) and then *REALLY* look at Buffy. You'll be shocked and embarassed, I guarantee it.

    7. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down there, pal. You're getting jizz all over the discussion forums.

    8. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by Derek+S · · Score: 1

      I like Frasier, and it does have a better recipe for mass appeal, but most of the time the writing isn't nearly as good as Buffy's. I don't watch soap operas or teen shows, so I can't make any comparisons with them.

    9. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try turning off the telly and going outside for some excercise. Don't wait until you're CowboyMeal-fat until you get on the treadmill or the basketball court.

    10. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you need to go outside. It was pretty pathetic, really.

    11. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like Frasier, and it does have a better recipe for mass appeal,

      Excuse me... just to bring you back from planet Buffy for a second: BtVS is packed with overly made-up teens, specially chosen for their photogenic qualities rather than acting ability... and lots of girl power bullshit. How much more designed to appeal to a mass audience can you fucking well get?

      Or do you seriously think that Buffy is cutting-edge TV, only watched by those with especially radical and subversive minds. Fuckwit.

    12. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I found that BUffy is quite well writen if you actualy take the time to watch more than one episode. It makes good use of long plots, as well as individual episodical plots. It's combination of one liners and drawn out humor keep a light edge to an otherwise dark series, and more often then not is very accurate in portraying person to person interactions. Yes, Frasier is a good series. I also happen to like Becker, Everybody Loves Raymond (though that's getting old) Seinfeld, M*A*S*H (now that's funny stuff)and a hand ful of other TV shows. I don't find buffy any worse than any of those shows. Is it a show for everyone? No, but that doesn't make it a good show.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    13. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      anything you say can and will be held against you. . . . "Charisma Carpenters tits."

      To hell with those. She and Kylie Minogue have the four best legs in the free world.

    14. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      TV and Treadmills go well together. Thats were I get a hefty dose of TV watching every day.

    15. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by Boliver's+Nuts · · Score: 1

      Although the poster is obviously someone who has not spent the time to appreciate the finer points of "Buffy" over the years, I agree with them on one thing. The writing this past season was so ham handed and character-driven that it seems more like a glorified soap opera than the wonderful, witty, engaging, well-acted, and craftful show it used to be. I'm one of its biggest fans, and recommend the boards at televisionwithoutpity.com for fun and intelligent discussion if it, but I'm so disappointed in the direction of the show that I find myself nodding my head in agreement at the above poster's statements, though they are without any writing skills, or intellectual consideration at all. If Faith isn't of interest to a good number of nerds, I don't know what it. Heck, I'm a hetero, married chick and I'd do her.

    16. Re:Definatly news for Nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although the poster is obviously someone who has not spent the time to appreciate the finer points of "Buffy" over the years,

      Pfff... the finer points of "Buffy" are entirely due to push up bras... not the writing, which was/is/will remain juvenile, simplistic and faux insightful.

  28. Does anyone really want Dawn The Vampire Slayer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, and that's why at the end of the season, when Buffy is gone, the show should be, too. How many other good shows have tried to squeak out one last final season after they should've finished, and have resulted in tarnishing the series as a whole. 7 years is a LONG time in TV time. Most shows never even approach that. 7 seasons gives them around 150 episodes, which is a great amount for syndication.

    Please, don't make us sit through a season 8 or a lame Dawn spinoff.... Now... a Spike spinoff... that's another story.

  29. Re:Does anyone really want Dawn The Vampire Slayer by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

    Nah - they've already done that, unfortunately. Completely different personality, yeah - but he's still just another vampire with a soul. I'm really hoping he moves over to Angel when all this is done though.

  30. Re:and this qualifies as news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > And besides, whether or not I can see the story about buffy, it's still a sign that slashdot's quality is waning.

    Funniest post. Ever.

    Dude, /. is well known and loved for its "trash" appeal. If you want quality go read bbc.

  31. FireFly = Outlaw Star by ScroP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That new FireFly show, judging by the preview at least, is a complete rip-off of Outlaw Star. Theplot looks exactly the same.

    1. Re:FireFly = Outlaw Star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, the girl in the box was lawsuit close.

    2. Re:FireFly = Outlaw Star by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      God, Im glad I wasn't the only one who thought that. When I first saw the commercial, I thought, where's the cat girl?

      --
      | - | - |
    3. Re:FireFly = Outlaw Star by cqnn · · Score: 2

      Outlaw Star was a complete rip-off of anime
      in general. That didn't keep it from being
      a good show that could stand on its own merits
      without being compared to everything that had
      come before it.

      Besides, (looking at the website) you could apply the same arguement in claiming Firefly
      takes ideas from Andromeda or Farscape, which
      are more likely to be in the notice of ratings
      minded TV execs than some show that happened to
      make a splash on the Cartoon Network.

    4. Re:FireFly = Outlaw Star by teraph · · Score: 1

      In what way does it appear to be a rip-off?

    5. Re:FireFly = Outlaw Star by ScroP · · Score: 1
      > Outlaw Star was a complete rip-off of anime > in general.

      It is anime so it has to be something like what you'd expect from anime doesn't it?

      > Besides, (looking at the website) you could apply > the same arguement in claiming Firefly > takes ideas from Andromeda or Farscape, which > are more likely

      I suppose so. It was the whole idea of the space cowboy who doesn't look for trouble, but trouble is always find him thing. Running away in a special ship with a bunch of people chasing him. The biggest thing was the live-action version of Melfina (the girl) in a metal suit case. That really makes it seems alot more like Outlaw Star than anything else. At to me it does.

      You're right that they'll rip off any other decent show they can think of too :)
    6. Re:FireFly = Outlaw Star by ScroP · · Score: 1
      A couple things triggered that thought. I'm sure there are just many thigns different.

      Space as the wildwest, outlaws vs the law. The struggle for the special cargo that turns out to be a girl in suspended animation. Main characters running from some awful tradegy in the past, end up as space pilots with shady jobs (bounty hunter/slaver). People keep chasing them, something about thier ships but they don't quite know what. Both have a genius kid with them.

      When all that is crammed together into a 30 second preview, it almost sounds like an Outlaw Star trailer. Looks like (in the reviews) there is alot of stuff you could probably find that comes from other shows. Maybe some original stuff in there too. That's just why it looked alot like Outlaw Star to me.
    7. Re:FireFly = Outlaw Star by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      So, maybe JW liked some of the ideas from OLS and decided to make them into a TV series, if it's good, more power too him.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    8. Re:FireFly = Outlaw Star by teraph · · Score: 1

      Mostly he was inspired by The Killer Savages, a book about the Battle of Gettysburg. [See his scifi.com interview.]

      I doubt he took much from OLS. He's probably never seen it. He's said in interviews that he doesn't watch TV (because he's to busy making it) [See here for the quote. (Bottom of the page.)]

      It has also been suggested that he took from Farscape and Andromeda--two other shows he's never seen.

      Some of the things ScroP cites above are pretty common, in both sci-fi and westerns.

      Space as the wild west was the basis for Star Trek, OLS, Cowboy Bebop, and any other space opera that treats space as a frontier.

      Outlaws vs. the Law is everything from Reservoir Dogs to Ali Baba to Han Solo. Space is just a change of venue.

      Character's running from a tragedy in their past? Thousands of people traveling west after the Civil War. It's a basic human motivation to escape our traumas.

      Genius Kid on a space ship? Wesley Crusher.
      Space pilots with shady jobs? Han Solo again.

      We're mostly talking about common archtypes.

      Even shipping someone in a box isn't that new an idea. Star Trek did it in "The Emissary" and Bram Stoker shipped Dracula in a box of dirt.

      It will be the details that will really display the strengths and differences between the two shows, and we won't see those until later this month.

    9. Re:FireFly = Outlaw Star by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      You know Outlaw star was actually my second thought after seeign a quick clip on TV the otehr day (I was bored what can I say?)... It was right after cowboy bebop... As well as quickly followed by such other shows as Andromeda & Farscape... As well as a few others... I'm just hoping he might make me want to watch something on TV again (I loved the whole Buffy series, but was forced to tune out at season 4 due to station issues)... I've watched most of the ones I've listed above & if he can fix the few issues I've had with those shows I may have finally found something to watch again...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    10. Re:FireFly = Outlaw Star by ScroP · · Score: 1

      That's true. I hope its good show. Farscape isn't going to be new for a while so I'll need something decent :)

  32. Buffy should have stopped at season 5. by tcc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Season 6 was terrible.... the acting looked terrible, the character interraction was terrible (blaaa lbaaa blaa blaa blaaa, 1 fight scene or 2, blaaa blaaa blaaa blaa blaa)

    I mean, it's okay to have character interaction, but over 50% of talking and silence and so on in a show that you were looking at because it had a "season" storyline and lots of action and intrigues to which you didn't want to miss anything. In that season 5 rocked, and when buffy died, she should have stayed dead, after that the show just plain sucked (exept maybe the last episode of season 6).

    Look at Angel, season 3 just rocked, they kept the same mood, storyline, action, darkness, heck this is supposed to be the "buffy for girls" show and I am way more on that one than on Buffy.

    I always thought a good show ends up at it's peak with a good end of story, and if you want to cash in extra, you create a spinnoff that will rock as much (angel rocks). Waiting till a show suck just enough that it loses all popularity in order to cancel it shouldn't be the way to do things. And there would be trememdous value after to buy the whole episodes on DVD season by season (and ALL of them would actually sell) and be of great entertainment. Of course, we're talking about the TV industry..... so... if they'd be any stronger and have it their way, they'd film a rock for 30 minutes and charge us for it.

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    1. Re:Buffy should have stopped at season 5. by Merlynnus · · Score: 1

      Waiting till a show suck just enough that it loses all popularity in order to cancel it shouldn't be the way to do things. And there would be trememdous value after to buy the whole episodes on DVD season by season (and ALL of them would actually sell) and be of great entertainment. Of course, we're talking about the TV industry..... so... if they'd be any stronger and have it their way, they'd film a rock for 30 minutes and charge us for it.


      Uh, I got lost in the rambling, so I'm not sure exactly whether you were referring to BTVS or Angel here, or just TV in general, but both series have been released on DVD. In the UK, you can get Buffy up to season 6, and Angel up to season 2 (see amazon UK). In North America, due to "syndication" you can only get Buffy up to season 2 (3 release this winter) and I don't know if you can get Angel at all. And, yes, they sell quite well.
    2. Re:Buffy should have stopped at season 5. by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1
      Angel has never been the same since they got rid of Doyle. Gotta love the funny stereotypical Irish messer.

      On the upside Angle provided plenty of excuses to see more of the gorgeous Julie Benz.

      I have always felt that Angel was really weak and even though the style was a little darker i dont think the content was really any darker than buffy, but then i have probably been completely desensitised by watching the HBO prison drama Oz which rocks.



      I always thought it was an interesting coincidence how the film "Bring it on" had vampire connections: Kirsten Dunst, interview with a vampire; Elisha Dusku, aka Faith the Vampire Slayer; and whats her name who played Glory in Buffy.

    3. Re:Buffy should have stopped at season 5. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean all those angsty teen series got a storyline?

      All I'm interested in anyways is Sarah Michelle Gellar jumping around and with several bodyparts bouncing and juggling and not being within my grasping range... DAMMIT! Hey, I'm an 18 y/o student, I'm allowed to be a(n apprentice) pervert.

    4. Re:Buffy should have stopped at season 5. by mbourgon · · Score: 2

      (tons of spoilers - I just finished watching last night)

      Odd, I thought this season kept building on what Season 5 offered, and was better than season 4. And of course, let me toss in the fanboy "Angel sucks, aside from Spike's monologue in Season 1"
      (you know, where Spike "narrates" a meeting between Angel and some female - "now to get some of that Nancy-boy hair gel I like so much. Quickly, to the Angel-mobile, away!).

      Lessee. Buffy had to get a real job, deal with being alive again, tormented by coming back, the sexual relationship with Spike, the Legion of Supernerds, The Asylum, her best friend going bad etc, etc.

      This could have become the 90125 season of Buffy, and while it had flirtations with it, pulled through with spirit intact. Maybe it was a little too dark. Maybe the last 5 episodes were a little too cliffhanger. Maybe the tone this season was a bit dark. Maybe the ending was a little too quickly resolved (I found it damn clever that Xander, who keeps being picked on for being normal, saves the world). But it rocked, harder than any other season. I didn't think they'd be able to beat last season. Happily, I was wrong.

      More than anything, this was almost a "piss off the fanboy" season. Joss has been known to do this, and I think either he or Marti decided to do it HARD this season:

      Kill off a major character, turn another into the season's "Big Bad", threaten their relationship with the show (Asylum), go a little dark with the Spike relationship. Oh, and make fun of the fanbase... I died laughing pretty much every time with the Legion of Supernerds. How many people posting here right now ARE those guys, but without the jet packs? Hell, I'm a nerd, I found it frickin hilarious.

      What were your complaints again?

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    5. Re:Buffy should have stopped at season 5. by dorsey · · Score: 1

      Um, you can't get Buffy season 5 and 6 on dvd anywhere. Doesn't exist yet...

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    6. Re:Buffy should have stopped at season 5. by Merlynnus · · Score: 1

      My bad; not being in the UK I mis-took pre-order links for *actual* links. Looks like Season 5 in October 02, Season 6 later.

  33. Oh no.. by dirtsurfer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    /.ers watch BUFFY!? Man, I knew you guys were nerds, but I thought there was at least some intelligence going around in this community. Yikes.

    1. Re:Oh no.. by Jim+Norton · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot ... you were looking for intelligence?

      --
      -- Jim
  34. Re:Definitely news for Nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All right, who is the dipshit that modded the parent poster DOWN? +3 is NOT overrated. And besides, quit wasting your points modding people down. People like you break the whole /. moderation scheme from something that could work into something that doesn't.

    (Mind you, the parent poster could learn how to spell "definitely.")

  35. Agreed. by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I've only watched this show a couple of times, and I've rarely been more annoyed than that. I guess I just find the entire concept of the series, the writing, and all of the characters to be completely irritating.

    I've also noticed that all of the die-hard fans really loved that musical episode. Musical episodes suck. I don't care if they're trying to parody Broadway or whatever it is that the authors think they're brilliantly trying to do. (IT'S SOOOOOOOO 3DGY AND ORIGINAL TO DO THE FIVE THOUSANDTH MUSICAL PARODY EPISODE! HUR HUR HUR!) Also: Broadway sucks.

    1. Re:Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn i wish i had mod points
      musicals suck

      there is a good reason they dont make them anymore

    2. Re:Agreed. by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      IT'S SOOOOOOOO 3DGY AND ORIGINAL TO DO THE FIVE THOUSANDTH MUSICAL PARODY EPISODE!

      Yeah... uh, about that. The musical episode-- wait for it-- wasn't a parody. It was a full-blown CinemaScope musical with an overture, themes, book numbers, and a big ensemble piece at the end. It had character development, and a plot, and it advanced the story of the season in an important way, forcing the characters to deal with a lot of stuff that had previously been only internalized. Of course, musicals-- as you'd know if you'd ever even seen one-- are all about externalizing the internal, so it actually made a ton of sense.

      If the musical episode had been a parody, or too self-aware for its own good, then you'd have been right. But that wasn't it at all. They didn't say, "We're going to do a clever parody of musicals." They said, "By God, we're going to do a musical." And they did. Like it or dislike it, you've gotta respect the accomplishment.

      Just don't make the mistake of thinking it was a parody.

    3. Re:Agreed. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh. My. God.

      You're right! You're right about everything! I've been watching Buffy for two years now, under the illusion that it was really fun concept, with interesting characters and great writing. Now, after looking at the entire show in the light of your keen insight, I realize that the show completely blows.

      Honestly, I don't mind that you don't like the show. I don't even mind that you rag on it. But this "I think everything sucks, and I must be pretty cool to be this cynical and jaded" attitude is just soooo 1998.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  36. Fat, hairy and sexy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you mean this guy is much more likely than me to get with her under the sheets?

    Guess it's time for me to start eating. Eliza, here I come!!

  37. NOT FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christ.. don't you have better things to do than fantasizing on Taco's mom? Get a life!!!!!!!! YA!$ Dfoaisjr wepojiaopsdfij

  38. Oh my, I am so excited by bailout911 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And we care because? This is possibly the dumbest story ever posted to Slashdot. Of course, Slashdot sucks now anyway, so it fits in.

    --
    --Stupid Sig Here--
    1. Re:Oh my, I am so excited by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      If slashdot sucks so much, why are you here? Is it because you enjoy sucky things? Perhaps you have nothing better to do with your time than waste it here? Oh well, at least I'm content.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  39. Re:and this qualifies as news? by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

    If it's any consolation to you, I don't want to hear anything to do with Star Trek, but I look forward to the rare occasions when Buffy news shows up. We balance out. :)

  40. So who really cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movie sucked, and the TV show isn't nearly as good as the movie. Why is it news that some wannabe-actress is returning to the series because she couldn't get a part as an extra anywhere else? Sheesh.

    This sure isn't "News for Nerds" and it certainly doesn't qualify as "Stuff that matters." It's more like "Lameness from the lazy. Drivel that wastes bandwidth. But you'll read it 'cause we're Slashdot."

  41. Trumps all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is such important news. To heck with civil liberties, peace in the Middle East, the declining state of the economy, mass starvation in Africa, etc. We're all so happy that Faith has returned to Buffy.

  42. Why don't you decide what's news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Click on your preferences. Under topics check Television. Submit Preferences. Stop your whining.

  43. Did you even *watch* season 6? by fingerbear · · Score: 2, Informative
    Sure, there were a few weak points (like the card-shark-demon-guy who actually looked like a shark) but Season 6 also had some of my favorite Buffies ever:

    1. "Smashed" (the one where Spike and Buffy finally hook up, oblivious to the building crumbling around them)
    2. "Once More With Feeling" (C'mon, they were all singing! That's awesome!!)
    3. "Normal Again" (where Buffy must choose between her screwed up reality and a safe, vampire-free future in a mental hospital)


    This is the best-written show on TV. I will watch until they stop making them, and I hope that's not anytime soon.

    1. Re:Did you even *watch* season 6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sure, there were a few weak points (like the card-shark-demon-guy who actually looked like a shark)

      That wasn't a weak point. In fact, it was foreshadowed/prophecied over a year earlier in the end of season 4 episode. If you rewatch that, you'll notice Spike wearing the same suit in both episodes AND they'll talk about a shark... on land... with feet. I found that hilarious.

    2. Re:Did you even *watch* season 6? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      It's pathetic, but I was actually quite disturbed by "Normal Again." How dare Joss upset his imaginary world by implying that the imaginary world was a product of someone's imagination? Okay, if that sounded a little confused, it was. But, as silly as it sounds, I felt like I'd been lied to. I still don't know if it was being speculative, or making a definitive statement about the world of Buffy. It shouldn't matter to me, but somehow it does.

      I'm sure "Newhart" fans felt the same way. :)

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    3. Re:Did you even *watch* season 6? by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      It was a loan shark. I thought everyone got the joke.

  44. Re:and this qualifies as news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if it might be interesting (which it isn't in my completely subjective and personal opinion) - in my opinion it doesn't really have to do anything with tech news.
    ok, admitted, slashdot nowhere states it is a tech news site, just this useless "news for nerds. stuff that matters" phrase. But this could be anything.

    So I just might have got the wrong site.. probably I should be looking for some alternative.

  45. Give me a break by jopet · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    please.

  46. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! [KuLPuF] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    m3 t00!

  47. Didn't you learn your lesson with the Lone Gunmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT'S CALLED A SPOILER

  48. Re:and this qualifies as news? by Nightpaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Like I give a fuck that AnandTech reviewed ATI's Mobility Radeon 9000? Quit whining; just keep scrolling when you see an article that you don't care about.

    And if you actually tried watching it, you might like it. I used to think it was lame, back before I ever saw an episode.

  49. Let Kendra return by tjansen · · Score: 1

    Let Kendra return, this would be good news. She was cool, in fact she the only reason to watch the boring show.

    1. Re:Let Kendra return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kendra is very much dead, killed in Becoming Pt1 (iirc) by Drusilla. That's how Faith came to be. Besides. Kenda had the worst Jamaican accent this side of Miss Cleo--I could live without hearing that voice again.

    2. Re:Let Kendra return by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      Quoth the AC, "Kenda had the worst Jamaican accent this side of Miss Cleo"

      Agreed. Her accent sounded like the bastard offspring of Jamaican and Welsh. Wanted to strangle her, it was so painful to listen to.

      HH

  50. Re:Plea to the RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not alone in the least. For some reason, I'm actually looking forward to seeing if Buffy is on the PTC's bad list. Suddenly, censorship isn't so unAmerican. Sometimes, it can be used to save us from utter stupidity...

  51. correction by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0

    It should have stopped right after the lame movie with Pee Wee Herman.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  52. Naysayers: ever watched it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A show called "Buffy The Vampire Slayer" is, admittedly, very easy to write off without having watched a single episode, especially given its sub-B-movie parentage. Fact is, it's one of the most complex, intelligently written, timely shows on TV.

    Having said that, I'd recommend against catching the first episodes of Season 7 without having seen anything beforehand; it'll be incomprehensible. Sorry folks, you've got to start at Season 1 (or 2 or 3, accompanied by a patient Buffy fan) and work your way up.

    1. Re:Naysayers: ever watched it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want to see something really eerie? View the recent press conference in Crawford with Rumsfeld and the Smirking Chimp.

      See in on CSPAN's site.

    2. Re:Naysayers: ever watched it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people have watched it and many people hate it. Is it difficult for you to believe that something you like may not be universally liked?

      P.S. Buffy sucks.

    3. Re:Naysayers: ever watched it? by Sancho · · Score: 2

      You're absolutely right. But there are also a huge number of Buffy converts... people who hated it solely based on the premise, but ended up loving the show after watching it awhile. I think the original poster was just talking about those people.

  53. SPOILERS, PEOPLE! by Sancho · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My lord, some of us don't want to know anything about the upcoming season. It's getting to where you can't read Slashdot anymore....

    1. Re:SPOILERS, PEOPLE! by Skwirl · · Score: 2, Funny

      These were pretty mild, but if the pseudo-editors here pull a Lone Gunman with a major Buffy plot twist... Well, let's just say, the last time I tortured somebody, they didn't even have chainsaws.

    2. Re:SPOILERS, PEOPLE! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      My lord, some of us don't want to know anything about the upcoming season. It's getting to where you can't read Slashdot anymore....

      In Episode 2, Willow resurrects the Lone Gunmen and then they get killed off in Episode 3.

  54. I used to have no interest in watching Buffy by Control-Z · · Score: 3, Interesting


    I ignored Buffy for years because I thought it would be like Beverly Hills 90210 or something. For some reason (I don't even remember why) I started watching the reruns that came on at 7:00 & 8:00 AM on FX. This is (maybe was) one seriously good SciFi show. The whole evil mayor season and the Glory season (I think they were seasons 3 & 4) were interesting, smart, funny, and scary.

    The best and most creepy episode is "Hush", where these grinning, silent, evil beings float through town at night and steal everyone's voices and then select a few people each night to cut out their hearts while they CAN'T EVEN SCREAM. About 2/3 of the episode had no dialogue at all, the characters had to communicate in other ways. It was seriously freaky.

    I know the past season wasn't as good, but there were still a few stand-out episodes, like the one where Buffy is dreaming (or really IS) in a mental institution and they're telling her that all the slayer stuff is in her mind. And the musical was much better than I thought it would be, it was actually very interesting.

    Don't knock it until you try seasons 1 through 4.

    1. Re:I used to have no interest in watching Buffy by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      Hush is my all time favorite #2! Seriously spooky, no doubt.

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
  55. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by Scrameustache · · Score: 2

    First of all, if you don't like TV and don't watch TV, good for you. I do watch TV, and I'm not ashamed of it.
    Secondly, the terrorist did win. They made things go boom, people were terrorised. Get over it, they won, and no matter how much more civilians you kill than they, they still won, its not a football game where the score counts.

    And since you qualify Buffy as "inane, mindless televison", its clear that your not watching it leads to you not being informed enough to have an opinion that counts. Seriously, its not inane, its smart, and you are a troll...why the hell am I taking the bait from a troll?
    Damn hangover...

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  56. You're right! by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

    You're right! If I was retarded I WOULD like cheesy musicals! Thanks for putting things in perspective.

    1. Re:You're right! by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I dare you to go watch any Andrew Lloyd Webber production and walk away from it going "That was Cheezy" Espesialy Jesus Christ Superstar

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:You're right! by Disevidence · · Score: 1

      "If I was retarded I WOULD like cheesy musicals!

      So you do like cheesy musicals then?

      Heres another perspective. If you hate buffy, why are you here? No-one forced you to come here and comment.

      Fuck off and die.

      --
      Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
    3. Re:You're right! by jimsxe · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you ARE retarded. If you dont like Buffy why are you posting? We dont give a shit about what you think, and by your comments would never care about any comments you make on any subject. Go away, get bent, kill yourself, whatever just shut the fuck up. Moron

      --
      This is not a Sig.
  57. Lone Gunmen, Part II by cliffy2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Has it ever occurred to Slashdot that perhaps we DON'T like our TV shows' plots announced before they're on! Does CmdrTaco have to join the ranks of ChrisD on my blocked poster list? Bah! Leave me and my sci-fi shows alone! Alone, I say!

    1. Re:Lone Gunmen, Part II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has it ever occured to you that maybe you should go somewhere else?

  58. TV by danpbrowning · · Score: 2

    I have a really hard time watching TV because of the quality of the content. Unlike most movies (which often have millions of dollars and tens of thousands of man-hours put into them), TV series are made of much less effort, talent, and budget.

    People should spend that time reading a book or working on their doctorate or something, instead of watching TV.

    --
    Daniel
    1. Re:TV by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      I don't watch TV either. Most things on TV are absolute rubbish. Buffy is the exception - it's brilliantly written, well acted and is generally way better, funnier, dramatic and entertaining than most movies that I've seen recently.

      HH

    2. Re:TV by Sancho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And yet, you seem to have no problem talking about it or telling others how they should run their lives. Heh.

      I fell into a burning ring of Karma...

    3. Re:TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. TV sucks because they don't pour millions of dollars and tens of thousands of man-hours into them. Shame on them. You should spend your time reading a book . . . how much money and time was put into writing those boring words on a page again?

    4. Re:TV by Rennt · · Score: 1

      I agree

      As a dedicated non-TV watcher I have to say that the quality of content is contemptable (what passes as "news" these days is particularly worrisome). I really do think that most people today are dumber for watching it.

      But all forms of media, no matter how flawed, are capable of greatness (even hollywood and the music industry ;) which is why every week I go to a mate's house and watch Buffy.

      You have to be careful that your mental media filtering system doesn't become to jaded and discards quality items with the junk. - I know that a nubile blonde teenage vampire killer doesn't scan well as the premise for a TV show of worth - but JW knows what he is doing.

      By the way, budget != quality. Don't ever make that mistake.

  59. SMG signed for two more seasons by Aexia · · Score: 2

    Sheesh. If you going to post spoilers for the 7th season, you might as well post ACCURATE ones.

  60. Good work, assclowns. by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of us were trying to avoid finding anything out about Buffy's upcoming season. Thanks a whole fucking lot for posting a spoiler right on the front page. God damn, you guys are fucking irresponsible some times. If it hadn't been for the Lone Gunmen thing, I might be willing to forgive it as a mistake, but you idiots should know better. Jesus fucking Christ.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Good work, assclowns. by Sancho · · Score: 2

      It sucks that other assclowns have modded a completely valid complaint as "flamebait". The headline of the story being a spoiler is the thing that does it. If the headline had been "Buffy Spoiler" or "Season 7 Information" that would be one thing. You can easily avoid the information by skipping the story.

      The backlash during the Lone Gunmen debacle should have taught them a lesson. Don't post spoilers in the headline. Obviously they didn't learn.

      Want to fight back? Email OSDN and tell them that you will stop viewing Slashdot because they constantly post spoilers for television shows that haven't aired yet. Hit them in their pocketbook.

    2. Re:Good work, assclowns. by MoneyT · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I personaly would have modded the person down if for no other reason than they used exxesive and unessesary language. At it been toned down abit, or had the language even been appropriate for the context, I would have had no problems with it, but it was over berring.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:Good work, assclowns. by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      I really hate to say this, and I realize I'll probably be modded down for it, but really people - you didn't see Faith coming back? I've just been counting the days (figuratively, I'm not that addicted to Buffy) until she came back.

      The Angel episode (I have no idea which one) where he visited Faith in prison, and was talking to her as if she was a mis-guided soul; that as much as blasted a banner across the screen: "Faith is coming back!".

      For those people who are real fans of the show and who've been paying attention to the subtelties they put into the scripts, you would have seen this coming from a kilometre away.

      Yeah, it sucks when Slashdot posts spoilers, but it's no reason to haul out the posterius-humourous references.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    4. Re:Good work, assclowns. by extrasolar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its only television...

      (don't hurt me)

    5. Re:Good work, assclowns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, for those of us who think that BTVS is rubbish, it's quite funny. Oh dear, your favourite TV programme is ruined, hahahahaha, I think it's funny. So do a lot of Slashdot readers, so I'm just glad it wasn't one of my favourite programmes. At least it saves you from being really bored actually watching it! :-)

    6. Re:Good work, assclowns. by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      The episode where Angel visited Faith was, like, one episode after she turned herself in -- and it was in the 2nd season, well over a year ago. And if anything, it might make you think that Faith would be returning to ANGEL, not BUFFY! And guess what? Just because YOU saw it coming doesn't mean they weren't morons to post it. Some of us don't sit there trying to guess what a show is going to do next -- we like to be surprised. I deliberately DON'T think about what might happen next season.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    7. Re:Good work, assclowns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO, it's Buffy.

    8. Re:Good work, assclowns. by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      Some of us don't sit there trying to guess what a show is going to do next -- we like to be surprised. I deliberately DON'T think about what might happen next season.
      Is that what this is about? You don't THINK about the television you're watching? You sit there, like a perfect Television Land Citizen, taking in the moving images being presented to you and thinking nothing of them?

      Are you trying to tell me that you're a 'real fan' who's been done a disservice by having the obvious stated in an online news page?

      I'm sorry, but in a world where television shows are increasingly brainless (half) hours of drivel, where new audiences can pick up the entire basis of a show's story through a single episode, and where genetalia humour is still worthy of a laugh, I enjoy a show that challenges me, that makes me wonder what's coming around the next corner. Not the simple things like a cast member coming back, but the intricate plots and complicated inter-personal relations.

      If you're going to be this petty and, I hate to say it, immature about things as insignifigant as show casting decisions, I'm sorry, but you're just not my kind of people.

      Relax and let life happen, and please, do me a favour and try to think about Buffy in the up-coming season. You might find that you enjoy the show a little more when you actually take it in.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    9. Re:Good work, assclowns. by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      You appear to be offended that I don't think about shows the same way you do. That's pretty sad, that you can't separate your own views from how others view things. You must be psychic to know so much about how I think, but I'll give you some actual insight: I DO think about the shows I watch, but I don't sit there trying to guess what will happen next. Wanna know why? I LIKE SURPRISES IN FICTION. You seem to think that this makes me some kind of generic TV zombie. Well, maybe your brain isn't capable of letting you think about what you've already watched, and keep you from predicting the future at the same time, but mine is. "Perfect Television Land citizen," indeed. It's amazing how much you seem to know about me -- like the fact that watching only two TV shows (Buffy and Angel) somehow makes me one of the braindead, zombie-like Con-su-mers that are so often decried on Slashdot. Just because I don't sit there in a fanboy trance, hyperanalyzing whether Buffy's hemline indicates a change in her sexual mores, doesn't mean I'm stupid. (Note that I'm not saying you do, either, or that it's a bad thing to hyperanalyze Buffy's hemline...) Also, if you're going to bother to belittle someone for the way they choose to think, you could at least do them the service of making sure there aren't any typos in your post. "Genetalia," indeed.
      Are you trying to tell me that you're a 'real fan' who's been done a disservice by having the obvious stated in an online news page?
      No, I'm just a regular guy... who's been done a disservice by having a spoiler stated in an online news page, where I had no reasonable chance to avoid seeing it. When will you accept the idea that simply because it was obvious to you, doesn't mean it's obvious to the rest of us? In fact, you still haven't given any plausible reason why it's "obvious" that Faith would be returning to Buffy. You only mentioned that one jail scene with Angel visiting her. As I said, that's far more likely to indicate that she'd return to Angel, not Buffy. AND it was two seasons ago. Yeah, it HAD OCCURRED TO ME that Faith might come back some day, but you have yet to point out any evidence that she was ACTUALLY going to come back. So how is it "obvious" exactly? Be specific.
      I'm sorry, but you're just not my kind of people.
      Hear that tiny, tiny, TINY little tinkling sound? That's the sound of me being crushed by the fact that I'm not "your kind of people," grammatically fraught as that is. Actually, the sound had to be magnified six hundred times to be audible, but I think you get the idea. At least, I WOULD think you'd get the idea, except you're probably convinced that I AM really crushed that you don't like me, since apparently you're psychic when it comes to how other people think and feel.
      Relax and let life happen
      You spend five (more) paragraphs belittling me because I don't think like you do, and then you have the fucking chutzpah to tell ME to RELAX? Holy fucking Christ.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    10. Re:Good work, assclowns. by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      It seems that bitching and griping about the obvious and complaining about Slashdot's news postings is the new way to gain favour (and mod points) around here.

      Oh, that and stooping to expletives to make a point (then chastizing my linguistic skills. Charming).

      I apologize for believing so highly in the skillsets of the average Slashdot reader and for making the rash assumption that you'd see a freight train coming from a mile away.

      This will be my last fucking post to this thread. I'm sorry to have wasted your (moreso my) time.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    11. Re:Good work, assclowns. by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      I like the fact that you've still failed to provide any justification whatsoever that Faith's return is "obvious," aside from snide insults. If you had anything that even came within slaying distance of intellectual honesty, you'd have posted it by now, or owned up that you just got lucky enough to guess that Faith would be returning to Buffy (or, perhaps, had deluded yourself into thinking that you predicted it -- I can't really say, as I'm not psychic, like you are). Now, from what I can tell by reading your previous /. posts, you do have a tendency to think things are obvious without actually explaining why they are, so I'm inclined to think that you really are just too arrogant to be bothered with things like "evidence" or "proof," content to spew unsupported thoughts as if the proof were -- dare I say it? -- obvious. Please prove me wrong, because I really would like to know how you knew that Faith was returning to Buffy -- did I miss an episode last season?

      It is also sad that you seem to think that the words of any individual /. reader (let alone me) somehow represent a magical "average Slashdot reader".

      Incidentally, I believe that expletives can contribute to a particularly emphatic form of language, when used for proper emphasis. Claiming that all such usage is "stooping" is among the worst kind of disingenuous linguistic elitism. Of course, one also might be called a hypocrite for criticizing another's linguistic skills, and then subsequently taking offense at another's criticism of one's own linguistic skills. But I digress.

      Your post indicates that you haven't got a leg to stand on, Buffy-wise, else you would have posted it by now. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously if all you can muster are insults, rather than anything resembling facts or logic? I'll admit, my own insults have been flying aplenty -- but you're the one making an entirely unsupported assertion. I'll admit my insults are not necessarily helpful (though they do make me feel better), but all you have are insults; at least I have logic on my side, so far.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  61. You JERK!!! by SHEENmaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some people NEED to know if Willow is gonna ressurect Tara and live happily every after.

    Some people NEED to know if Angel will ever escape from the bottom of that lake.

    Some people NEED to know if Xander will ever convince Anya to take him back.

    Some people NEED to know if Cordelia will leave Gruselug.

    Thank Torvalds I'm not on of them!!!!

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  62. CDNB by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

    That's a great site.. thanks for telling me about it.
    Unfortunately, it adopted the "mostly text" approach of IMDB, which can be a big bummer for anyone who wants to see nude chicks now.

    --
    Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
    Nave H. Weiss
  63. Re:and this qualifies as news? by roach2002 · · Score: 1

    I have seen episodes. hence why i think it's lame.

  64. 'Beverly Hills 90210' With Vampires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's considered newsworthy on \.? And just when I was beginning to think that this site had fully plumbed the depths by being hijacked by Australians...

    1. Re:'Beverly Hills 90210' With Vampires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen brother, Amen!

    2. Re:'Beverly Hills 90210' With Vampires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure what you mean by hijacked but I have seen lots of stories about Aussie (sp?) stuff recently. Most of which have been as irrelevant as this Buffy junk. What's up with that? Does Taco wear a hat with corks hanging from it now?

  65. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember what happened to Rome ? Mouahahahahaha :]

    Go away, Muslims had numbers and maths way before you even knew how to kill the next native american you meet. And you're using those numbers right now to screw the world, big fat-ass US of A ! You're a bunch of morons, as you always were.

    Have a nice day.

  66. And you're not much better.... by Sancho · · Score: 2

    She did indeed sign for two more seasons....last season. So Season 6 was her first, and 7 will be her second. Of course, unless Joss is a dumbass who can't look a cash-cow in the mouth, he'll beg her to sign for another.

  67. I tried to watch it a couple times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but it sucked so bad the TeeVee turned itself off.

  68. Feckin spoilers by irongull · · Score: 1

    Is it too much to ask that you guys not put spoilers on the front page? This isn't nearly as bad as the Lone Gunmen Incident (LGI), but still... I'm a rather rabid fan of Buffy, and I avoid fan sites and commercials for it like the plague. I want each episode to be a surprise, in the way it was intended. And I know I am far from alone in this.

    Perhaps the most unforgivable thing about this and the LGI is that the slashdot editors don't even care enough to fix their mistakes. Minutes after the LGI was posted, there were legions of howling mad West Coasters and Europeans raging about what had happened. To prevent further damage, the story could have been changed to remove any specific references to the plot. Something along the lines of "Something amazingly bad happened in X-Files tonight, click here to discuss". But instead, all they did was add an apology to it. Fecking pathetic.

    So now the surprise of Faith's return has been ruined for me and thousands of others. In the next few days, thousands more will check out Slashdot and it will be ruined for them too, because the editors here don't care enough to fix their mistakes.

    While I'm in rant mode, could somebody put a fecking "s/definately/definitely/ig;" into Slashcode? Even otherwise intelligent people are constantly mispelling this.

    1. Re:Feckin spoilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't think Faith's return would've been slapped all over ads, promos, and various tv entertainment news spots? It's not like they detailed how she'd return, or what she'd do. And, even more importantly, something could still happen to make her not return, considering these episodes haven't been filmed yet, and probably haven't even been completely written.

      There's a big difference between this and the Lone Gunman incident.

    2. Re:Feckin spoilers by irongull · · Score: 1

      Like I said, I avoid any information about Buffy like the plague. The only other thing I watch on UPN is Enterprise, and I tape it and skip commercials precisely to avoid Buffy info. I do not watch any form of entertainment "news", as I believe things like the E channel and Entertainment Tonight are at least partially responsible for the decline of Western civilization.

      Of course this is not on the same scale as the Lone Gunment incident, but it betrays the same lack of editorial care.

  69. Erm... by rakslice · · Score: 2

    Okay, have you ever actually seen the show?

  70. Thanks for the spolier!!! You've saved us all!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, thanks to the Slashdot spoiler, hopefully less people will watch the series, and hopefully the studios will notice, and hopefully this will be the last ever Buffy The Vampire Slayer series ever made!!!

    YES!!!

    So, everybody who has moaned about this not being news for nerds, think about it, at least by putting up with this one post, in a few months, we'll never have to read about BTVS ever again!!! Thank you so much Slashdot editors!!! You are brilliantly clever!!!

  71. good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what IS it with this show? I honestly don't understand the appeal (I mean, now that I'm over 11 years old). I'd sincerely appreciate it if someone could explain the fascination grown men have with this program.

  72. Faith the vampire slayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

  73. Dawn the Vampire Slayer by eatenn · · Score: 1
    I'm inclined to agree that this is not news for nerds, but hey, since it's posted...

    Season 7 is definitely looking like it will be the last. Joss and Co. are making the effort to make Dawn less whiney and more likeable, probably setting her up to have the torch passed. Eliza Dushku has signed on for the last five episodes of season 7 (as well as three episodes of Angel), which fits in with the Dawn-Slayer-Spinoff theory, because Faith will probably die in one of these episodes, passing the Slayer line down to Dawn.

    To me, this sounds like a bad idea. Not because I don't think Mutant Enemy can pull it off, but because Joss is an incredibly busy man and the work suffers when he's spread too thin. Look at all the shows he's already got going: Buffy, Angel, Firefly, The Buffy Animated Series, an upcoming Giles spinoff (probably called "Ripper," cool) that has been put on hold, AND he wants to start another new show? We're talking massive burnout potential here. There's some consensus that season six was Buffy's worst (although still okay), and Joss only wrote one ep all season (Once More, With Feeling), less writing than he's done in any other year... this probably isn't a coincidence.

    In any case, I'll watch 'em anyways :)

    --
    "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
  74. *sigh* by Rumagent · · Score: 1

    To many sticks, not enough meat... /Rumagent

  75. Potential! by hitzroth · · Score: 1

    Oh! Oh! Or even read a book! Or a series of them! Imagine! All kinds of material all strung together in a coherent fasion! Can you believe it? Oooh! Or even paying attention to current events! Imagine! The Continuity! The Drama! The Lies! The Deceptions! The Squirrels on Water Skis!

    TV rots your brain, degrades your creativity, and blindsides your imagination leaving you a drooling blob... Which obviously proves I've already watched too much TV.

    --
    In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
    --VonNeumann
  76. You're not JW so you can't say that by enclaved · · Score: 1

    We didn't know that another slayer was called the first time until Kendra showed up. There could be another slayer out there from when Buffy died at the end of season 5. It's all up to the creators of the show to decide what is 'law' in their universe.

    1. Re:You're not JW so you can't say that by Boliver's+Nuts · · Score: 1

      Joss Whedon stated at the end of season 5 that the Slayer line continues through Faith, and not Buffy. Of course, the man's a liar, so...

  77. Re:African Slayer was Jamaican by MCRocker · · Score: 1

    I stand corrected. I'm definitely not up on my Slayer history. Not being one of those who has an extensive collection of Buffy DVDs to refer to I was relying on my all-too-faulty memory. Having done a little retroactive research, I have discovered that Kendra was apparently Jamaican and showed up in several episodes... ultimately dying in the Becoming 1 episode. There are several web sites devoted to Kendra including kendra-slayer.com where you can find out much more as I should have before posting my original message.

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  78. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are we using numbers to screw the world? Heck, how are we screwing the world? The world screws itself. Aside from that, the muslim's math capabilities had nothing to do with their religion, which their terrorism does.

  79. Re:and this qualifies as news? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    You forget, geeks are rooted in SF&F. To say that a show like Buffy does not qualify as geek or nerd material is elitist, and stupid. And so fine, you ant to read about the other shows, go read about them. No one forced you to read this article.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  80. Re:and this qualifies as news? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    Slashdot: News for NERDS , stuff that matters.

    From NerdWorld.com

    What is a Nerd? The typical definition of a Nerd is someone who is passionate about an activity that is not necessarily mainstream. Typically these activities have to do with technology or academia. In addition to the passion, there has always been an aura of being a social outcast associated with the term Nerd.

    If nothing else, I think Buffy and other fantasy TV shows qualify as non-mainstream. That being said, this woul dbe news for nerds and is therefore acceptable on slashdot. Just keep scrolling, don't click the link and move on with your sheltered day.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  81. Gee whiz by fm6 · · Score: 2
    This is not worth a headline on Slashdot. I'm qualified to say this as a Buffy fan and as Eliza fan (though maybe "fan" is the wrong word). It's just a minor casting decision, fer crisakes.

    If we're all so thoroughly into the Whedonverse, let's concentrate on the important stuff -- like the absence of space noise from Firefly.

  82. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by Disevidence · · Score: 1

    Hahahaha I love it.

    "Worst terrorist attack", "Holy War against Islam"

    "Israel and Palestinians teetering on the brink of Genoci^H^H^H^H^ War?"

    You know the apparent "reason" (besides oil and power) the United States is intervening everywhere and pissing everyone off? Its so that the general population can watch buffy/surf the internet etc etc...

    I think I devote enough time and money caring about the world. Why aren't people allowed to have a few luxuries in life, as long as those luxuries don't come at the expense of others? So unless anime starts employing sweatshop artists, i can still watch anime, thank you very much.

    I admire your troll, however, and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    And for the record. I really don't care about the Sept11 attacks. Sure its not nice for 3000 people to die, and i feel sorry for their families. But a lot greater injustices and deaths happen in the world every day, and you can't afford to get lost in self-pity. So skip the S11 rhetoric.

    --
    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  83. Re:and this qualifies as news? by Disevidence · · Score: 1

    You're too fucking serious dude. Its called scroll down the page, and it works wonders for whiny fucks like you.

    If slashdot's quality is waning, why not go somewhere else?.

    Actions speak louder than words.

    --
    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  84. Re:and this qualifies as news? by Disevidence · · Score: 1

    "I want tech-news, esp. from the fs/os area!"

    Like martyn s, you also have the power!

    --
    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  85. Dead Buffy and other issues by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I agree that the premise of Buffy is beginning to wear out. I'm a rabid fan, but I'd rather see the show go away than descend into standard TV mediocrity.

    That being said, I really think that Season 6 was almost great. Unfortunately, when you're doing this kind of creative risk-taking "almost great" usually is equivalent to "bad".

    When you say, "They should have let her stay dead", you're forgetting that they chose to kill her off in the first place. In fact, the death and ressurrection had been planned more than a season before. A big gamble -- especially when you've just made a big point that Bringing Back the Dead is a big no-no.

    Such an ambitious story twist required soom really good follow-up. And that's where they blew it. Af first they seemed to be leading into a really good arc, which involved a long-standing "good" character getting seduced by her own power and going over to the dark side. But then they seemed to lose track of what they were doing, going off in every which direction. Some of these directions were sort of good (the Evil Nerds had their moments) but most of it was recycled corniness that was better suited to an After School Special. (Magic as addiction? Barf!) Worst of all, none of it did anything to advance the main story arc.

    Plus they put some of the characters though changes totally at odds with their past history. And then finally they picked up the original arc very clumsily, killing off a popular character in the process, but not making any real connection with the ideas raised at the beginning of the season. The final eps were very well done -- but I couldn't enjoy them, having been so frustrated by the way they were set up.

    Despite his protestations to the contrary, I've come to think that Joss Whedon has spread himself too thin. He claims he delegated Buffy to people who know his mind, but the sad truth is that Season 6 foundered on gimmicks that he never allowed when he ran the show directly. He needs either to do a better job of delegating, or scale his work back.

    1. Re:Dead Buffy and other issues by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Despite his protestations to the contrary, I've come to think that Joss Whedon has spread himself too thin.

      Failure is the price of success.

  86. Faith was my favorite character on that show. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2
    This might actually be a reason to flip on the boob/moron-tube once more.

    Faith was easily, for me anyway, the most touching character I've seen on television in a long while. It's uncommon in television to see a character grow so much through a series. Think about all the phases she went through, including all the frustration, heart-break, broken efforts and masks worn, all the way to a final redemption. Underneath everything, there was a good kid after all. So many people in the real world go through similar trials, and never manage to jump the final hurdles. It was very satisfying to see her survive the journey. A very touching character.

    Faith is easily one of my favorite television characters to have graced the screen in a long while. --I found Jeri Ryan's (Sp?) charcter 7of9 on Voyager to be similarly evocative, (which was one of the bigger surprises of the last decade of television considering the initial impetus for the character; -Window dressing for a dying series!

    Though. . . Since Joss withdrew from directly working on Buffy, the show has turned into exactly the kind of high-gloss 90210 teen-shine crud it originally launched in sharp contrast with. --You know? With wisdom, compassion and actual human insight rather than a 'Pretty Kids' club house full of 'Oh So Meaningful' self-centered drama. Stopped watching about two episodes in last season, right around the time I decided to Never Watch Television Again. (An abstaintion I find myself unable to keep with absolute faith every week, but hey. Balance in all things, right?)

    Basically, the problem is that Joss was each of the characters, and knew how to write them instinctively; no formulas or mechanical thinking required. --And perhaps more importantly, he could look over a script from one of the staff writers, and fix in a flash the rough guestimates at dialogue the other writers could only ever try to capture through observation. Like some guy trying to do Kermit's voice post Henson. When such a level of understanding and humanity is achieved, no matter how hard the second in command may try, nobody can ever be Kermit again. Like-wise with Buffy & crew.

    Hopefully Joss will be working on the new Faith material. If not, then I'll be damned sure to avoid the living hell out of it. I wouldn't want to see an almost flawless story tainted by new and bullshit writers attempting to work with Faith's character.

    Though, this Firefly thing. . . Frankly, Joss is one of the few creative geniuses of our time who has made his mark in television drama. I'll give anything he works on a try.

    I just hope that, unlike poor Lucas, he can avoid the thought-police and keep his brain from being sucked out through a tube for being too likely to have a positive impact on culture! Cuz, you know, we gotta go perpetrate our greed and evil upon the world and it would be disadvantagous to have people in the West influenced by wise and humane thinking!

    Heavens, No!


    -Fantastic Lad

    1. Re:Faith was my favorite character on that show. by jzitt · · Score: 1

      Though. . . Since Joss withdrew from directly working on Buffy, the show has turned into exactly the kind of high-gloss 90210 teen-shine crud it originally launched in sharp contrast with. --You know? With wisdom, compassion and actual human insight rather than a 'Pretty Kids' club house full of 'Oh So Meaningful' self-centered drama. Stopped watching about two episodes in last season, right around the time I decided to Never Watch Television Again.

      You stopped watching the show two episodes in and state an opinion on how the rest of the season went? There's a telepathy port on your TiVo?

    2. Re:Faith was my favorite character on that show. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2
      You stopped watching the show two episodes in and state an opinion on how the rest of the season went? There's a telepathy port on your TiVo?

      Nah. I checked in with the series every once in a while. Usually couldn't sit through the entire hour, though. And the whole, 'druggie' thing with Willow and her 'problem' was pretty unbearable. What 2d genius thought that one up? (Or was that nonsense from the season prior? It's hard to keep track of all the lame.)

      Though, I did catch the musical episode, which was a lot of fun. --It always pays to check in when Joss shows up to direct. But for the most part, you gotta admit; the show has become a shadow of itself since the glory days of seasons 2 and 3, when 90% of the episodes were stellar, rather than the other way around.

      Not that I should really complain. After all, it's free entertainment pumping through the ugly box in the corner of my house. I'll take what I can get and turn off the rest. Suits me just fine.


      -Fantastic Lad

  87. Re:and this qualifies as news?-BM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I have to agree, this is the lamest story I've seen in a while, and while some mod-troll tried to mod you down for being off-topic, this story is off topic. So yeah, my stories about planet formation and Palm m130's suits get rejected, this shit gets in. What the fuck?

  88. Well, that's a silly question! by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

    Q: Why are you here?

    A: It's fun.

    1. Re:Well, that's a silly question! by Disevidence · · Score: 1

      I've never viewed it that way... hmm. I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  89. Converted to the Buffyverse (silently) by fm6 · · Score: 2
    The best and most creepy episode is "Hush"...
    Yep, that's the episode that sucked me in when it was first shown back in '99. Before that, I didn't get the basic premise of Buffy -- in fact, I'm still not sure I do. But "Hush" was so different from anything I'd seen before, I had to stick around. It isn't the creepiness of the story. (It's plenty creepy, but that sort of thing goes right by me.) It's the sheer beauty of the storytelling. Which, interestingly enough, makes very effective use of sound. And the final scene, where silence is inflicted for one last ironic moment, is priceless. I won't say, "beyond words"!

    Unfortunately, this ep loses some of its best moments in the FX version. It's a decent job of editing, but a lot of my favorite visual jokes are gone. I may have to buy the DVD. Oh wait, I don't even own a player...

    Don't knock it until you try seasons 1 through 4.
    People who aren't already hooked are not going to have the patience to sit through the the first season or the the first half of the second. If you can live with not knowing all the backstory (and you're sort of in trouble there anyway -- part of the premise is only documented properly in an out-of-print comic book), a good place to start is midway through Season 2, with "Suprise", which is the 13th ep in Season 2. This ep begins the first really great story arc, and trots out a whole slew of really well-acted bad guys.

    I actually rather like season 5. The first ep was awful, but it's my personal favorite story arc -- my favorite villain, and a new character is introduced in a truely originaly way.

  90. Buffy news.... Buffy category? by rakslice · · Score: 2

    Although I'm a fan of the show, I have to wonder why this story is here. A front page posting? Is a result of some kind of coherent editorial policy or just a symptom of sloppy editing? I mean, okay, Buffy has a certain geek affinity, and so I understand why it would squeeze in for anthropological interest. But stories about relatively insignificant casting rumblings?

    There are already good sources of show and cast minutiae (e.g. Slayage) and spoilers (e.g. The Spoiler Slayer) for those in need. Editors: If you really feel the need to feed us, say, casting baubles, or angsty rumblings about the future of the show, make a category for them. If not, save it. Thanks.

    -aT

  91. They were great, but... by Goonie · · Score: 2
    I agree that those three episodes were really, really good, but they're getting fewer and further between - just like the Simpsons, which can still be incredibly funny on occasions.

    In my opinion, the show is running out of dramatic territory to cover, and it would be nice if it was allowed to die gracefully while we're still watching instead of die a miserable near-ignored death like so many fine shows.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  92. Taco and hemos r 2 fuckin' lazy these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They handed the reigns over to some brits and aussies and now we have to wade through the boomarang and wombat stories to find anything worth reading. Think its time to go elsewhere. :(

  93. Re:and this qualifies as news? by Azghoul · · Score: 1

    When in the HEL did /. have any "quality" to begin with? Give us all a break and quit whining.

  94. Re:Plea to the RIAA by enclaved · · Score: 1

    It was.

    http://tv.zap2it.com/news/tvnewsdaily.html?27735

    They call it the least family friendly show on television.

  95. Re:Didn't you learn your lesson with the Lone Gunm by enclaved · · Score: 1

    This isn't a spoiler

    This is:

    Episode 1:
    Herc reports that Drew Greenberg indicates that the returning Big Bads will all appear in the final scene of the first episode. My understanding is that this involves some sort of shapeshifting being that appears in the presence of Spike. It shifts into the shapes of several of the Big Bads, from one into the other, perhaps backwards through time. Is it real or is Spike hallucinating?

    Episode 2:
    The Oracle reports that Buffy is having Slayer dreams. Interestingly, Spike repeats to Buffy something she heard in one of her dreams. Are the writers showing some sort of mystical connection between Spike and Buffy?

    Episode 3:
    This episode does not pick up where episode 2 ended. We find out later that after Spike's confession about the soul, Buffy ran away, not able to deal with it. However, she, Xander and Dawn come to him for help when they are trying to find out what's behind a dead body Xander found.

    Episode 3 and 4:
    Spike is still helping Buffy and the Scoobies in episodes 3 and 4, but his sanity is still an issue.

    Episode 5:
    Anya confronts her past, present and future; Hallie and D'Hoffryn appear; Xander tells Anya he still loves her, but Anya may not be ready to resume a relationship; Buffy gives advice to Spike.

  96. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn hangover...

    Congratulations! You tried alcohol, and you're so proud you have to tell everyone!

  97. Buffy would be better without Buffy by Saturn49 · · Score: 1

    Something I've said to my roommates (who constantly filled my TiVo with Buffy all last year):

    Buffy would be so much better without Buffy. The show is very entertaining, all the characters are interesting and amusing in their own respect. Except Gellar. She is way too annoying to be amusing. Her one-liners seem to sink the show to an unwatchable level of stupidity. Her character is unrealisticly goody-two-shoed, even when she had the "fling" with Spike. If Buffy leaves, I might be inclined to actively watch the show (instead of watching it because my roommates were, and there was nothing else to do). Besides that, Faith could make killing vampires actually look interesting again.

    Similarly, Dawson's Creek would be an excellent show, without Dawson...

  98. Now that IS odd. by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    Ok, I'll skip right by the fact that Buffy just isn't news. At all. And it's taking me all my willpower to do just that. It was a 'B' movie to begin-- But I digress. I did want to mention something about Firefly, however. Without knowing much about it, it strikes me as unusually similar to Cowboy Beeboy and Outlaw Star... Again, it's just a passing glance, but it's got that deja'vu thing happening all over it.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  99. A sad day for slashdot... by opcenter · · Score: 1

    ... when Buffy the Vampire Layer makes the front page. I mean really, as previously stated, is this actually news that matters? I think not. Someone needs to do a major overhaul on the filtering system (also known as CmdrTaco)... I've lost all respect for him.

  100. Jesus fucking Christ??? by repetty · · Score: 1

    >> Jesus fucking Christ.

    Lemme guess...

    You want to cut into the front of the line going to hell.

    1. Re:Jesus fucking Christ??? by andyt · · Score: 1

      >> Jesus fucking Christ.

      Lemme guess...

      You want to cut into the front of the line going to hell.


      If that was true, he'd have said "Jesus Cum-Guzzling Christ".

      This is a fun game, anyone else want to play?

  101. Re:and this qualifies as news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think Buffy is not mainstream? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

  102. Stuff that matters has been redefined. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    In a day where the world is discussing sustainable development in South Africa, Buffy gets the headlines in /.

    I don't care if some people watch that rubish, but I believe discussions about such non issues should be kept in the appropriate fora (idiotic TV and gossip magazines) and not in a place where "Stuff that matters" is used as a motto.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  103. "If that's not a path to base your entire life on" by dwalsh · · Score: 1

    "If that's not a path to base your entire life on, I don't know what is."

    Hmm... perhaps reality? :-)

    --
    ${YEAR+1} is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop!
  104. Willow has excellent computing taste by Andre+Breton · · Score: 1

    "iMac laptop": It's "iBook" moron ;)

  105. Too fatalistic by fm6 · · Score: 2

    Not all systems scale badly!

  106. 100% agreed by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

    Nice work, Cmdr Fuckface. And to think.. I barely read /. anymore, but the one day I'm bored and look at the front page.. big old Buffy spoiler. And you're right, it's not even the first time. Didn't CmdrTaco even post something like, "I never would've posted the Lone Gunman spoiler?" And now he goes and posts this.

  107. My Hopes for the next season! by Cyberglich · · Score: 1

    Ok heres what I see in my crystal ball 1.Spike becomes a winny little toad and buffy stakes him. 2.Faith come to sunnydale and hooks up with willow (prison will do things to people :) ) 3.Faith then gets hit by lighting and dies (for about 1 min see bellow) 4.Dawn gets trigered as the next slayer (she dose have slayer blood you know) 5.Not to lose 2 lovers in 1 year willow heals Faith before she crosses over. 6. The 3 slayers with magic backup from Willow and onya (how ever you spell that) kick but. 7. Zander almost never leaves the magic box just stays there doing research.

  108. This is a human mind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy, Enclaved, sucks as a writer and needs to get a life. Stop by Walmart on the way home and pick one up. Why does Slashdot publish the moronic ramblings of a cretin that's wanted for mail fraud on Ebay?