Slashdot Mirror


Tattoo To Monitor Diabetes

infonography notes that the "BBC is reporting about using tattoos to monitor the state of a diabetics' health. While TV's the Invisible Man series had this, this is actually real. Designed by Gerard Cote, of Texas A&M University they are made of polyethylene glycol beads that are coated with fluorescent molecules. Likely this will start to change the attitudes of parents who have been resisting the urging of their kids to get Tattoos."

60 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. Handy... by Richy_T · · Score: 5, Funny
    Now when a diabetic goes hypo, the words "feed me sugar" can appear across their forehead.

    Or, remembering a particularly traumatic experience when a friend went hypo, perhaps the words "fuck you" to save them the bother of saying them themselves (yes, I know a hypo diabetic is not in their right mind).

    Rich

    1. Re:Handy... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2

      Yes indeed.

      My sister-in-law has passed out from low blood sugar several times in the last year. Before each episode, she said something akin to "Fuck off!".

      Nowadays, when she says "Fuck off!" we force her to sit down and measure her blood sugar.

      Of course, sometimes she has perfectly normal blood sugar, and has a perfectly legitimate reason to say "Fuck off!", and us saying "Are you feeling ok? Perhaps you should stick this sharp needle in your finger and experience some pain, just to alieve our fears" just makes her angrier...

      But still, she completely passed out on me twice now, and each time we either had to force sugar into her convulsing, drooling mouth or stick a big needle into her quaking leg to counteract the effects of the insulin. It's scary...

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  2. Wha? by Steve+G+Swine · · Score: 3, Funny
    Likely this will start to change the attitudes of parents who have been resisting the urging of their kids to get Tattoos.
    "Oh, c'mon, Mom, just get a tasteful little rose somewhere..."
    --
    "Consider yourself a member of a virtual corporation with Mr. Torvalds as your Chief Executive Officer." - Linux Advocac
  3. How long would this last? by ndnet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sounds like a great idea, and I know many people (my grandfather included) who would prefer this to the finger pricking fun on a regular basis. However, it does raise a couple of questions.

    1) How long would it last? Since it ISN'T absorbed into the cells, how long could the fluorescent dye, if you will, stay in the "interstitial fluid"? Would you need a new tattoo every month? year?

    2) How much will it cost? The method doesn't really sound that expensive, except for the watch-like device. But will HMOs pay for it? Medicare?

    3) How reliable is it? There are some diabetics who are very sensitive to sugar differences. Howa accurate can this be? Does it compare favorably with strips?

    1. Re:How long would this last? by Yorrike · · Score: 2
      If I had to get a new tatoo every month, or even every week, it'd beat the hell out of ripping tiny little holes in the tips of my fingers.

      Trust me on that one.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    2. Re:How long would this last? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2

      Might I recommend that you try the new Softclix lancet device? I hate sticking my finger as much as the next guy, but if I have to, I prefer to use this model. It's not painless, I won't kid you, but it's the least painful I've found.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    3. Re:How long would this last? by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

      take it from the son of a diabetic. pricking your finger and taking care of yourself is much preferred to the neuropathy that can develop if you don't. course once you have neuropathy you don't have to worry about pricking your finger cause you won't be able to feel it anymore.

      remember, prick your finger, never finger your prick.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  4. Gimme! by mindriot · · Score: 5, Informative

    If this is actually working, I'd happily volunteer to be the first to use it... I think the advantage is not that it's pain-free. I couldn't care less about pricking me in the finger. The real problems with conventional systems are

    • You are dependent on an electronic device and test strips. You have to carry it with you at all times (or should at least), and I could move around much more freely if I did not need to take with me and look after my glucose tester.
    • The test strips have to be bought regularly (I use between three and five per day), and they're not exactly cheap. It's also a pain because, at least in Germany, I have to get a Doctor's prescription each and every time I need to buy new supplies. Some sort of subscription would really help here. I am diabetic, and I will be for probably the rest of my life, so why the need to get a stupid prescription all the time, instead of having some sort of token that entitles me to buy my medication whenever I need to?
    • Nothing could be of more help than a continuous measurement. That way, for example, I could immediately tell if my food had more carbs than I expected and I can react sooner.

    Also, while devices for continuous measurement are out there, I don't expect them to be really comfortable, and I'd still depend on a device that I have to look after. So if this tattoo proves to be working, I'd be more than happy to use it.

    Oh, and a question -- this polymer stuff reminds me of those materials used in modern hard-to-forge banknotes (see here for instance), is that a similar material?

    1. Re:Gimme! by garcia · · Score: 2

      they want you to have a prescription so that you have to constantly be checked by a Dr. in order to get your meds/items. That way you are forced to visit and pay up (at least in the US where we don't have nationalized healthcare).

      I have to take prescription meds for high blood pressure, same thing. Every 6 months, check to see if the meds are working the way they should, and refill for 6 more months.

      It's a pain in the ass.

    2. Re:Gimme! by Yorrike · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The case here in New Zealand is you must get a prescription, but after that, the test strips are effectively free. I've been dreaming of a watch that'd constantly tell me my blood sugar since I was a boy.

      Don't dispare, there's some interesting treatment in development here in New Zealand that's cured a few Type 1 diabetics (like me), by using pig isolete cells encased in polymer tubes that are implanted in the abdominal area.

      Really great stuff, but New Zealand's government is full of crack pots who think that such implants could introduce a retro virus - so the recipiants of the implants have been in Mexico and the Cook Islands so far (they're actually curing people).

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    3. Re:Gimme! by x136 · · Score: 2
      I think the advantage is not that it's pain-free. I couldn't care less about pricking me in the finger.

      Heh, that's you. I hate it. I'd love a non-invasive testing method, continuously monitoring or not. (I know I'd test a lot more, too.)

      The real problems with conventional systems are
      • You are dependent on an electronic device and test strips. You have to carry it with you at all times (or should at least), and I could move around much more freely if I did not need to take with me and look after my glucose tester.
      • The test strips have to be bought regularly (I use between three and five per day), and they're not exactly cheap.


      Well, you'd still need some sort of device to translate the intensity of the glowing tattoo into a number. It'd still be a vast improvement, though. No more lancets, no more blood, and no more of those expensive test strips (IIRC, they're like US$50 for a box of 100 if your health plan doesn't cover the cost.)

      Imagine the cool devices that could come out of this. Maybe a watch that constantly monitors the sugar level, and can be exported to a computer, maybe with software that analyzes the data and suggests changes in your insulin doses... Okay, I admit it. I'd be happy if it did nothing but make it unnecessary to do a finger stick test. :)

      As has been said by many others so far, sign me the hell up.
      --
      SIGFEH
    4. Re:Gimme! by garcia · · Score: 2

      Considering that it costs me $50 per visit, I don't see how it is helping me. I don't see the need for 6 month checkups when the prescription won't change for years, possibly decades.

      Fuck the HMOs and the Dr.'s. I don't see why I should have to pay a dime for either my visit or my prescription. 60 pills should not cost $38. It just shouldn't.

      I feel like I am buying Ecstacy.

    5. Re:Gimme! by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Plus in the paranoid post-9/11 US, you can get in trouble for carrying your kit on a plane. (Hasn't happened to me yet, but did to a friend).

      On top of that, if I get this, I don't have that stupid Sharps container lying around, that I have to dispose of as hazmat waste!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Gimme! by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      The government may be full of crackpots cross-species virial infections have happened before, and pigs are a good source.

    7. Re:Gimme! by pythorlh · · Score: 2
      I've been dreaming of a watch that'd constantly tell me my blood sugar since I was a boy.

      There is such a watch. Glucowatch. My mother has just recently gotten one, and it does pretty well. There are alarms for sugar too high, too low, or just changing fast and you really aught to check it. Sensors are good for 12 hours straight. Unfortunately, the website says pick US or Europe, so it may not be available in New Zealand. :(

      --
      Do not confuse duty with what other people expect of you; they are utterly different.Duty is a debt you owe to yourself.
    8. Re:Gimme! by rodgerd · · Score: 2
      Yes but no one would find out without rigorous testing- and there are many diabetics who would be willing to volunteer as test subjects.


      Be that as it may, take a look at the most prominent cross-species disease jump: Scrapie -> BSE -> vCJD. In humans, vCJD takes 10-20 years to manifest; even a 5-10 year controlled study may not find a disease. And vCJD, worrying though it is (especially to people like me, who live and ate meat in the UK in the early 80s), is at least reasonably difficult to contract; we're not talking an ebola or influenza style pandemic here. If we got a 1918 style flu strain out of trials, it wouldn't matter how well conducted they were, we'd be in big trouble, unless the people in the trial feel like living in isolation conditions for years.

      The tattoo, on the other hand, looks really cool - although I know some people are a little concerned about the materials used, I'd hazard a guess that any ill effects are lower than the problems caused by inaccurate monitoring.
    9. Re:Gimme! by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Most of the Diabetics I know should get a Demonic Face in a normal tatto ink, and then make the eyes and mouth this stuff, that way when they go Hypo the demon eyes will glow and you know to get the hell away from them until they deal with it.
      Preferably this should be right on their forehead so we don't miss it and accidentally speak to one of them...

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  5. Sounds cool, sign me up by jonabbey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It sounds like there's a lot of details left to be worked out, but if something like this could serve as a continuous blood glucose diagnostic, I'm so there. Having been an insulin dependent diabetic for the last 13 years or so, a continuous blood glucose monitor has really been the most important missing piece to the whole puzzle.

    Sampling my blood sugar once or twice a day is far too infrequent to get a sense of how my blood sugar rises and falls over time. Having a monitor that could record my blood sugar levels even every five minutes would be fantastic. Make it able to sample every five seconds and hook it up to an insulin pump, and you've got as close to a cybernetic cure as one could hope for.

    Being an insulin-dependent diabetic is like driving a manual transmission car.. very workable, but you have to do a lot more work, and you have to know what the engine and gears are doing. If it's still too early for a cure, having a really good tachometer would be the next best thing.

    And having an intelligent cyber-tattoo would be just too cyber-punky for words. Sign me up.

    1. Re:Sounds cool, sign me up by jonabbey · · Score: 2

      Okay, well, imagine a manual transmission car that you are only able to shift four times a day. ;-)

  6. Re:Pain free? by Yorrike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been a type 1 (insulin dependant) diabetic for 19 years (since I was 3) and no matter what anyone tells you, it still hurts. You do get used to it, but it's pain I'd rather avoid, all the same.

    --

    Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

  7. a few more benefits by exhilaration · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is cool - I thought of a few more benefits:

    1) This would make it far easier for the patient's loved ones to measure their glucose levels. A mother would be able to check a child's glucose level in the middle of the night without waking him/her up. I can also imagine a coworker saying, "Dude, your glucose looks a little low - maybe you should go eat something." :)

    2) Even without a bracelet or necklace identifying the patient as a diabetic, emergency personel could quickly see the patient's gluocose levels. If a diabetic is laying on the side of the road about to enter a coma, saving a few seconds could be critical.

    Personally, I like (1) - it would be a huge quality of life improvement.

  8. Re:Hrm, as a juvenile diabetic... by topham · · Score: 2

    Perhaps the insulin injections could be changed to pill forms, etc, -if- the monitoring was more frequent (to the point of rediculous with the current tests).

    Not saying it could or would, just thinking that a more active test could potentially lead to alternative treatments which are difficult, or useless in the current environment.

  9. That Tatoo sure is talented by bubblegoose · · Score: 2

    De plane, de plane boss!

    I thought Tattoo was only good for monitoring incoming planes, now he can track diabetes?

    --
    I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
  10. Some possibilities for easier use by Goonie · · Score: 2
    What about tattooing a "reference chart" next to the actual sugar-sensitive tattoo as a rough guide, so that you could monitor major changes by just glancing at the tattoo? Maybe even arrange it so that certain segments glow as threshold levels are reached (kinda like a battery gauge type of thing)?

    Or, even, tattoo it to your wrist and have a colour sensor in your watch that started bleeping if your sugar levels changed too much.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  11. Heh, by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "Tattoo To Monitor Diabetes"

    Look boss! The ... uhh.. Shit. Can anybody think of a diabetes related word that rhymes with 'plane'?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Heh, by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "I'll come up with a rhyme for "plane", if you can find a way to change "Fantasy Island" to "Islets of Langerhans" without harming the Neilson ratings for it..."

      I'm not going to get a +1 Funny with this thread, am I?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  12. Flourescent tattoos by FCAdcock · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Flourescent tattoos are not safe

    As a professional tattoo artist, and a liscensed one to boot, I am regularly asked if I can/will do the new flourescent tattoos, and I always give the exact same answer. "NO!"

    In 20 years, I may, but right now, while there have never been any long term tests to see if these tattoos will cause bodily harm, I refuse to put flourescent ink in anyone. There have been no tests to aprove the flourescent inks for permanent cosmetic use, so no one is certain that these inks are safe. Every bottle of ink in my shop comes with about 20 pages of paperwork documenting that the inks have passed years of medical testing, and have been found safe. The flourescent inks do not come with this paperwork, so I refuse stock those inks.

    Think about it, things that glow usualy come with warnings saying not to ingest, that means it's not safe. When you put ink in your skin, it does the same thing as if you swallow it.

    --
    --Forest C. Adcock--
    1. Re:Flourescent tattoos by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      Come on...tattoos are all about rebellion and being different. Now that tattoos have caught on, it's not enough to just have a tattoo. Frankly, the current inks in use are rather dull...getting a tattoo isn't as enticing as it used to be. Vivid colors will attract new ensure the tattoo trend keeps going strong. They didn't always have 20 pages of documentation for tattoo supplies, that's the invention of a self-serving government regulatory agency. Or do you not think tattoos were availible before the latter 20th century? ;)

      I thought I'd also take this chance to give a link to a good list of tattoo artists, if you happen to be in the San Francisco Bay area.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Flourescent tattoos by Effugas · · Score: 5, Informative

      I actually looked into this myself some time ago. (I was doing some research on some rather brainfucked abuses of inkjet printers.) Yes, you're absolutely right that raw fluorescent ink fails pretty spectacularly over time. Not only does sunlight (with its massive UV1/UV2 dosage) bleach the fluorescent tats down to a ugly yellow stain, but it apparently becomes quite...err...itchy over time.

      Not pretty.

      However, some massive new work is being done with encapsulating various forms of bio-active chemicals (the bleached ink molecules are enough to spawn an itch reaction) within various types of polymer chains. Some pretty interesting stuff is being done with encapuslating approaches...a really elegant breast cancer treatment works as follows: Take a potent anti-cancer agent (poison, to be blunt) and attach it to a non-toxic, heat-sensitive polymer, such that the combination of the two remains non-toxic.

      Inject the combo into the bloodstream.

      Take the patient, and dip her breasts in water hot enough to separate the polymer from the toxin. Now watch as two things happen:

      1) Only the breasts reach critical temperature, so only they might be exposed to the chemo, and
      2) The blood vessels in the breast will expand, and those sections with the most blood vessels will receive the highest dosage of the chemo. Those sections are usually tumors.

      From what I can tell, it's pretty tricky to design the polymer that is stable at 98.6F and unstable at 105F -- any hotter, and you're doing damage with the heat alone! Creating arbitrarily stable non-toxics is comparitively much easier. That's what it sounds like they're doing here -- they're taking a molecule with a useful function (fluorescence), attaching it to something that prevents it from reaching toxicity, and linking the expression of fluorescence to the level of insulin surrounding the molecule.

      It is likely a useful side effect of this will be generically functional fluorescent ink, replete with quite a bit more than the 20 pages of paperwork you're used to.

      Yours Truly,

      Dan Kaminsky
      DoxPara Research
      http://www.doxpara.com

  13. Obvious next step... by tlambert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The obvious next step is to vary the type of material being used linearly across the tattoo itself, turning it into a "glucose meter".

    As an interesting aside, could this method be used to produce tattoos that were more easily removable as well?

    I think I would want this to be removable, particularly when stem cell research finally cures diabetes once and for all, and you are left with a legacy tattoo.

    -- Terry

  14. s/glucose/opiates/ by DrVeg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This really has great medical potential, but I can imagine similar developments of the future used for other purposes. Being able to monitor bodily chemicals could be extremely valuable, but also subject to unexpected uses.
    As condition of your employment, you agree to a permanent tattoo that indicates drug use.
    Or,
    The court orders you to get a drug-monitoring tattoo and scan it by your home internet-connected device every 6 hours.

  15. Re:Pain free? by jonabbey · · Score: 2

    The biggest thing is not being able to have a continuous readout, but the pain and hassle is not to be ignored, either.

    And you'd be amazed at how many test strips an insulin dependent diabetic can go through..

  16. Re:Hrm, as a juvenile diabetic... by Jacer · · Score: 2

    I too am diabetic, or atleast I was from age 16 to 18. Some time in June of this year my pancreas started to produce insulin of it's own. While I know (as much as I may want it to be) this isn't permanent, I know that i wouldn't want a tattoo for life.

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  17. Anybody remember this? by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

    I remember reading a while back about a "needle" that was created using a process similar to etching computer chips. Basically, it consisted of numerous tiny needles in a grid (10,000 to a square inch or something), which reach deep enough into the skin to enter the capillary system, but not deep enough to trigger the nerves and register pain.

    I thought this device would have great application in both glucose testing and medication delivery, but haven't heard anything abou it lately. Does this sound familiar to anyone?

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
    1. Re:Anybody remember this? by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      Apparently pain isn't something researchers are concerned about.

      My greatest health fear is becoming a diabetic and having to inject myself, test my blood, etc. Needles and I do NOT mix.

    2. Re:Anybody remember this? by CokeBear · · Score: 2
      Sounds like the predecessor to the HypoSpray on ST:TNG.

      Are we there yet?

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    3. Re:Anybody remember this? by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

      Well, testing your blood is not a walk in the park but as far as I'm concerned it hurts less than the electrostatic shocks I get on a regular basis at the local grocery store. In fact you can generally set the lance so that it doesn't cause pain at all (at least I was able to).

      That's why I thought this etched needle sounded like such a great idea. If you can get into the skin with one of those, say, hooked to a watch/computer you could be monitoring your blood on a constant basis, delivering insulin as your body needs it, and probably do all kinds of groovy things. And all without the needle phobia that haunts a lot of us. (I'm type II diabetic on oral medication but it's only a matter of time. I'm hoping I can keep it under control until research gets to the point where I don't need to worry about having to go to injections.)

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    4. Re:Anybody remember this? by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2

      Pain isn't a problem. The needles are short, and sharp and you are injecting insulin into fatty tissue around your abdomen usually (although I also use my thighs at night). As long as you don't use the same needle for too long (i.e making it blunt) then you don't even feel it.

      As for finger-pricking, same rule applies, don't use the same lancet (skin puncturer thingee) too long and it doesn't hurt at all.

      When your injecting 6 times a day like myself, you get used to it pretty quickly :-)

      Times have changed from when you had to draw insulin into a hypodermic from a vial.. now we just dial the amount, jab, press and go :-)

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  18. Re:Detecting dangerous glucose levels? by Yorrike · · Score: 2

    Then you, sir, are drunk. : )

    --

    Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

  19. Close but no cigar. by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2

    I am a type one diabetic, who doesn't test levels any where near as much as I should. While I can clearly see that continuous blood glucose monitoring would be a god send, it's not quite what we need.

    Now if we could combine continuous monitoring with an insulin delivery device, in such a way that the monitor controls the delivery, that would be pure heaven.

    Imagine, insert an insulin and mabe a glucose cartridge every week or so, the monitor tells the device to deliver insulin when it detects a rise in glucose, and tells the device to deliver glucose when the glucose levels drop to hypoglycemic levels.

    You could do anything you want, safe in the knowledge that your diabetes management device would keep your levels within not only safe, but healthy levels.

    No more worrying if your late with dinner, or early with dinner - the glucose and insulin doses will even it out, want to go for a run, just go - the glucose will make up the shortfall if needed, want to veg out on the couch, by all means - the device wil just supply a little more insulin to cover your lazyness. It'd be like having a superislet (islet's are the cells that produce insulin for you non-diabetics).

    I think the delivery is the easy bit, you could just strap a small device with a needle to your arm or something. The monitoring is the difficult bit, from what I know of the current continuous monitors they are neither accurate or infact particularly continuous.

    --
    NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    1. Re:Close but no cigar. by Myco · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The really cool part is if these were cybernetic implants, and you could slap the replacement cartridges into your wrists just like Spidey's webshooters.

  20. Oral Insulin is Coming by mumkin · · Score: 2

    the pills people take today aren't really insulin... they just help your body use the insulin that you do produce, or coax more out of you. they only work for people who have relatively functional pancreases.

    real oral insulin instead of insulin injections/pump would be a major breakthrough, and there is much work in the field. There seems to be some very promising work on this at Purdue, which may be related to the current Nobex clinical trials. Israeli researchers have a line on it, too. Shots may well soon be a thing of the past!

  21. Cosmetic applications by Myco · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Well, first of all I'd really hate to see people just getting a boring old meter on their arm. I mean, it doesn't really matter what shape the thing is in as long as you can read it, right? So get a funky spiral or make it part of a larger design or something.

    What would be even cooler would be to start seeing this technology, and "adaptive tattoos" in general made available to the general populace. The ability to have tattoos that change their appearance depending on physiological conditions would open up new worlds of expression. Anyone who's read Nylund's "Signal to Noise" will remember the character Panda's always-changing eyelid tattoos. Very cool.

    1. Re:Cosmetic applications by BluBrick · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The ability to have tattoos that change their appearance depending on physiological conditions would open up new worlds of expression.

      The Japanese had this in their traditional body art for many years until recently. It's a white ink that is almost transparent on pale skin, but becomes quite distinctly visible when the skin is blushed. IIRC, it was traditionally applied to women as an erotic decoration. When the woman was especially aroused, her skin would blush and her tattoo would light up like Las Vegas.

      This particular tattoo ink is now extremely unpopular and may even be illegal because of its major downside - it's a lead-based pigment.

      Perhaps this guy can shed more light on the topic.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    2. Re:Cosmetic applications by BluBrick · · Score: 2
      D'oh! That submit button is just too close to the preview button ;)

      I meant this guy.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  22. Hmm.Anti-Freeze in the skin.. Healthy? by ldopa1 · · Score: 2

    Polyethelene Glycol is the major component of antifreeze, if I remember right...

    Weren't we always told not to touchor drink the stuff as kids?

    --
    The Dopester
    "Yes, I'm a Karma Whore, but I'm doing it to pay my way through school."
    1. Re:Hmm.Anti-Freeze in the skin.. Healthy? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Anyone else notice how nicely today's pagetag meshes with this thread? Being this:

      "Did it ever occur to you that fat chance and slim chance mean the same thing? Or that we drive on parkways and park on driveways?"

      Slashdot is reading your minds, kids :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  23. Re:This should really be a great thing by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been hearing about thise glucowatch for the better part of 12 years now. I work in the glucose monitoring industry, and this story has been popular for years. Every recent mention of I have seen shows that the precision is still poor, and you still need to perform daily finger-stick tests to calibrate the watch, so if you're looking to get away from sticking your finger, the glucowatch won't solve your problems.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  24. Re:Wouldn't work by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2

    Islet cell transplants are reporting great success in Mexico, where teenagers with the cells transplanted into their bodies are able to live without any insulin injections.

    For those that don't know, it's not the pancreas that creates insulin, it's tiny cells inside the pancreas called the Islets of Langerhans that produce insulin. These cells can be removed from recently deceased people, treated with a series of enzymes and other biochemicals to leave just the Islet cells which can be safely injected into a diabetic (usually into the liver) where they release insulin into the blood stream.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  25. Re:What the hell? by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    Or to the person when he/she has reached a mature age and has a stupid looking Pikachu tattooed on them?

    Ah, but by then Pokemon will be retro chic - 30somethings at parties will discuss episodes religiously, and whether anyone remembers the time charmander whopped jigglypuff, and just how gay was James out of team rocket?
    All crappy kids TV shows become a 30something cult, given time...

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  26. Another advantage of widespread bg monitoring... by hlh_nospam · · Score: 2

    ...is that the benefits of a low-carb way of life would become more widely demonstrated, as would the idiocies of the low-fat fad.

    In addition to the realization of just how much nutritional disinformation we are being fed by the popular media, we would see widespread consciousness-raising in regard to the deleterious effects of unnatural substances in our diets (sugar, grains, trans-fats, etc). The relative benefits of various types of exercise would be more readily apparent, and immediate feedback would encourage more healthy lifestyles.

    There is already ample evidence that one of the major keys to a long and healthy life is the reduction of the amount of insulin your body needs (others include wearing seat belts, avoiding violent crime, getting ample sleep, avoiding environmental poisons, not taking gratuitous risks, not smoking, etc.).

    One can only hope that some better way of doing this can be found. Since current bg monitoring is done by IR absorption/transmission, I would think that a small IR reflector could be implanted, perhaps just under an artery or vein in the arm near the skin's surface. Then a monitor could use this to directly read bg (perhaps with occasional calibration with other methods) using a short IR burst.

    Other things I'd like to be able to measure (inexpensively) in real time: Insulin level, HD/LD/TG, ghrelin (and its recently-discovered agonist, which doesn't have a popular name yet), white cell count, seritonin, and DHEAS. Might find some other items worth monitoring, to add to that list. Gathering a large amount of data on these things might result in a quantum leap in real knowledge on a subject that is now characterized by 'research' that consists largely of:

    1) Writing a conclusion based on current biases,

    2) Collecting data artfully chosen to support that conclusion,

    3) Submitting the 'research' based primarily on the pre-conceived conclusion for review by people with the same or similar biases, and

    4) Getting published in a journal of some mutual admiration society.

  27. Hide that tattoo by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    Put it somewhere where it can't be seen or you'll get endless wisecracks about "Gee Bob, you're a little cranky. Looks like your blood sugar is a bit low, eh?"

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  28. Tattoo is too boring by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    They should install a little flag that pops out of the top of your head like a turkey thermometer. *POP* "Low blood sugar, time to get a snack!"

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Tattoo is too boring by Myco · · Score: 2
      Could be distracting. I would not want that happening during sex, for instance.

      ...or would I? Hmmm...

  29. Re:Hrm, as a juvenile diabetic... by gorilla · · Score: 2

    There are two reasons that insulin can't be taken as a pill. The primary reason that insulin can't be taken as a pill is that insulin is an enzyme, that is made from protein, and our digestive system breaks down all proteins to their consitutant amino acids. If the protein isn't broken down to amino acids, then it can't pass through the intestines into the body, the molecules are too big. You have to bypass the digestive system, meaning injections. The second reason is that insulin has to be very carefully regulated, either too much or too little causes problems. Pills can't be adjusted to that level, because the digestive system causes a delay between taking the drug and it entering the system. So, it's basically impossible for insulin pills to be manufactured.

  30. Re:This should really be a great thing by mumkin · · Score: 2

    I don't believe that they claim the GlucoWatch should be used as an accurate point-sample meter, but rather as a continuous monitoring device to indicate trends. Theoretically it lets you know the approx rate at which your glucose is rising/falling so that you can take the appropriate measures. The utility of the device probably depends on your personal diabetes management strategy -- whether you control your meds, or just your food, etc.

    I have been told that its method of sampling tends to leave scar tissue behind, but I have no first hand (wrist?) experience of the product.

  31. Re:Come on! by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    Couldn't scrape up the cash for that second nipple?
    I'm kind of surprised there is any stigma left to piercings considering how many people I see with 6 or more...

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  32. Re:Another advantage of widespread bg monitoring.. by hlh_nospam · · Score: 2

    "Life expectancy" over the last century is a misleading average, which includes, among other things, two global wars in the first half of the last century. *Maximum* lifespan has remained fairly constant, while infant mortality and death of women during childbirth has declined. Various medical advances do in fact account for most of that improvement. The remainder is mostly from changes which make driving and working safer (divided highways, workplace safely rules, etc).

  33. Re:Caffeine by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2

    Now all I need is a tattoo to tell me when I've had too much coffee...

    There is such a level?

    ..brings shaking cup to lips..

    Never!

    --
    Necessity is the mother of invention.
    Laziness is the father.