FSF Award for the Advancement of Free Software
bkuhn writes "The FSF has posted a a call for nominations for the 2002 FSF Award for the Advancement of Free Software. Get your nominations in to <award-nominations@gnu.org> by 15 October 2002."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
I nominate Bill Gates. He should get the award for advancing free software
I've downloaded more free software from kazaa than I ever have from any other source.
Username taken, please choose another one.
The Blender Foundation has done an unprecedented thing by raising so much cash to bring Blender into the Free Software Fold. I'm not aware of any program in the free software base which is so sophisticated as a 3d modeler. I think they are pioneers and should be lauded for their efforts!
Clickety Click
I'm going to nominate Valgrind. It's going to greatly improve the performance of Linux software across the board, and puts professional grade profiling in the hands of every MP3 playlist coder on Freshmeat.
What else? Nothing much happened this year. I'd suggest the Mono developers who seem to have accomplished a lot, but won't because I haven't tried it myself and because it's not especially relevant yet (if ever). Mozilla got a lot better, but they did so much bragging up front I'm not inclined to puff them up again now that they've finally accomplished something.
What I'm listening to now on Pandora...
The GNU Award for the Advancement of GNU Software?
Define "free" however you like, but I hate hearing "free" when it means GNU. If they want to be so pickey about defining all their terms, they should stop leaning on the ambiguity that the term "free" gives them. The neophyte immediately understands free to be free beer. GNU is exploiting that, since 6 pages of legalese in the GPL doesn't add up to free beer OR free speech.
I'm not sure if he was the one who started cygnus support, but if he is, that is also something that should help him get the prize (where would free software be without cygnus today?).
Don't forget about Lindows's "Clicky Award..." Think what you will of Lindows, or LindowsOS, or the name "Clicky," but 50 grand donaed to Open Source software projects is 50 grand. Yeah, $50000US. Go forth and nominate!
Oh, and where it says "we will add you to our mailing database," you can immediately unsubscribe from the Lindows web page.
A solution to the problem with music today
Linus Torvalds has received the award, but the plaque was engraved...
GNU/Linus Torvalds
in order to reduce confusion.
While Debian's Free Software-only politics was controversial some years ago - anyone remember the ugly term "Debian Nazi"? -, it no longer seems so due to DMCA, patenting, and perversions of copyright. Debian has done invaluable work for the Free Software community by thoroughly reviewing the licensing of the software it ships, freeing users from the hassle to become legal experts. Debian users enjoy both the technical excellence and the legal safety of running Debian "main".
It would be good if the FSF Award were given to Debian to finance work on the new Debian installer. This is the last showstopper piece which prevents massive newbie user adoption of this distribution.
gopher://cramer.plaintext.cc http://cramer.plaintext.cc:70
Chris "Monty" Montgomery the mastermind behind Ogg Vorbis and cdparanoia.
"Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
How about Paul Vixie, for maintaining the comp.sources archives for forever, so that they didn't get lost in the mists of time?
How about Fred Fish, who pretty much single-handedly invented the compilation distribution disk?
How about CSRG for BSD UNIX?
How about Kernighan and Ritchie, for the C language?
How about DECUS, for the DECUS tapes?
How about Ward Christensen and Randy Suess, for inventing the modem, and giving the idea away?
How about Ward Christensen again, for inventing the Xmodem protocol, and giving the software away?
-- Terry
I've already nominated someone, but anyone want to nominate John Carmack?
He's released much of id's older under the GPL, most recently Quake2.
I think he gives a good balance between making money in the commercial sector and releasing code for people to learn and develop from. When a game engine is no longer profitable, he releases it. I think this should serve as a model to other companies to release the code for their old software/abandonware, especially in games.