Slashdot Mirror


Free Internet Access Is Profitable In Egypt

prostoalex writes "With the demise of free Internet access providers, it's interesting to see this model working in Egypt, where the state-owned telecom allows people to dial-up for free as long as they pay the regular phone access fees. Associated Press quotes the phone line charges being 25 cents per hour. The ISPs that promote free Internet access from Telecom Egypt are then given their share of the profit."

46 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. Just what I need... by spakka · · Score: 5, Funny

    more bloody pyramid schemes

  2. Mutual benefit by nuggz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good idea, the phone company makes more money due to more phone usage.
    They just pay out a small portion for this, it is like quantity based discounts that other companys use.

  3. Around the world by Banjonardo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ig, or Internet Gratis, is one of the biggest ISPs in Brazil, and it's free. It runs on the advertisements it displays.

    --

    -----

    Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    1. Re:Around the world by Banjonardo · · Score: 2

      How much do they advertise? (If at all?) Ig has ads on the log-on screen, and your homepage is their site. I think that's pretty much it.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    2. Re:Around the world by Banjonardo · · Score: 2
      I completely agree. Ig is inconsistent, boring, slow, and the ads in the log-on screen are annoying.

      Luckily I don't live in Brazil anymore, but I really pity my family members when I get back. *shrudder* You really get what you pay for.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    3. Re:Around the world by Banjonardo · · Score: 2
      I'd rather pay money too. But I don't live in Brasil anymore and am blessed with a DSL connection that rules. I really pity my family when I go back, though.

      I'm pretty sure the ads are all on the log-on screen, but I can't recall. Besides, the way you get disconnected, you're probably logging on a lot.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

  4. 25 Cents US? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    That represents a tiny pittance in our terms; You can get that much by finding pennies on the ground outside the supermarket.

    How much is that in terms of the average Egyptian's income?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:25 Cents US? by Drawkcab · · Score: 3, Informative

      Their per capita GDP is $3000 per person, about 1/11 of the US, and the distribution of wealth/income is not unreasonable. So lets say that is the equivalent of $3/hour in terms of local purchasing power. That compares favorably to the way dialup ISPs used to work before flat rate plans became commonplace, and they are not committed to any monthly bill, they only have to pay for what they need. Internet Cafes are also popular in Egypt, another way that the general population has affordable access to the net.

    2. Re:25 Cents US? by bhsx · · Score: 2

      Gee... now, I'm an American, so my geography ain't near as bad as my grammar; but I don't think Syria is in Egypt. Someone correct me if I'm wrong here... ;)

      --
      put the what in the where?
    3. Re:25 Cents US? by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

      its a lot. from a previous article i'm too lazy to search for, they were offing downloads of songs for 50c or something, and that ended up being like $10. so 25c is probably equal to $5

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    4. Re:25 Cents US? by raju1kabir · · Score: 2
      Gee... now, I'm an American, so my geography ain't near as bad as my grammar; but I don't think Syria is in Egypt. Someone correct me if I'm wrong here...

      From 1958 to 1961 the two countries came together under one flag as the United Arab Republic, if that makes you feel any better.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    5. Re:25 Cents US? by bhsx · · Score: 2

      yeah, that's what i was pointing out... all be it sarcastically. Sorry 'bout that; but at least you understood. :)

      --
      put the what in the where?
  5. I don't like it .... by nicodaemos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At $ 0.25 per hour, I would be paying about $3/day ~ $90/month. Right now I pay about $70/month for unlimited usage.

    Americans hate pay per use pricing schemes. Notice how all of the cell phone companies have moved to flat rates for a large number of minutes .... it's because we like to pay for unlimited usage of things whether it be the internet, phones or sex.

    Okay, well we've worked out the first two at least.

    1. Re:I don't like it .... by Quikah · · Score: 2

      You pay a monthly fee for the line (like $10 or so).

      --
      Q.
  6. Free internet access at college by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    The U.S. has free internet access too. All you have to do is live in a college dorm at most large colleges.

    1. Re:Free internet access at college by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      thats not free. just because its included in the amount you are paying for tuition does not make it free. it subsidized, not free.

    2. Re:Free internet access at college by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      it [is] subsidized, not free.

      This is always true.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    3. Re:Free internet access at college by MisterBlister · · Score: 2

      The same applies to this Egyptian ISP. It is not free, its just shifting the charges from direct ISP charges to phone bill charges. Yet the headline calls it 'free Internet'.

    4. Re:Free internet access at college by MisterBlister · · Score: 2

      Are you on crack?

    5. Re:Free internet access at college by MisterBlister · · Score: 2

      Don't you think for the average person the computer/phone use would be primarily in addition to the voice/phone use, and not instead of it?

    6. Re:Free internet access at college by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      If it wasn't for the 25 cents an hour, phone line installation charges, and monthly phone line charges, so would the egyptian deal.

  7. Successful in India by daaku · · Score: 3, Informative

    The same strategy is being used in India, and its quite successful. Its not exactly free, as you pay for phone access plus more, but there's no account setup, username/password and so on. Its extremely convenient, you get charged for what you use with your phone bill.

  8. Re:hmm by captain_craptacular · · Score: 2

    Yeah gee, that would be nice. Because then my always on account would only cost me .25c x 24hr x 30 days (ave) = $180 a month. Thats a pretty sweet deal, I'd drop my DSL in a heartbeat!

    --
    They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
  9. don't privatize! by Roadmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kudos to the egyptians, now they only need to keep their telecom company state-owned; nasty things happen when you privatize those companies without adequate governmental regulation; witness what happened to the telecom companies in Mexico, Chile and perhaps other countries in south/latin america. They turned, overnight, into greedy monopolies which can't be stopped (here in Mexico, Telmex is running their competition, even the giants like Worldcom-backed Avantel and AT&T, into the ground via dumping and other monopolic practices); and the quality of service hasn't really improved. i'll stop ranting now :)

  10. If only we had single media monopoly... by yintercept · · Score: 2

    Wow, if only we had a single monopoly that controlled all communications, why then we could have a free ISP (well free in the part that you are still paying for it with your phone bill.) Gosh, they have almost 900,000 of 63 million people online. That is over a full percent! Instead, we have all these greedy little ISPs running around charging people for service. Can any of you remember how great it was when ATT was the only company, and we didn't have all this annoying fax, cellular, nickel a minute LD stuff? It was like paradise on earth. I think we should all get off this open source wagon, and jump back on the one company ruling the world wagon...like Bill Gates would like. For that matter, I am sure MS would be more than happy to give the US free internet access, if we gave them the monopoly of all software and internet publishing as the fee. Unfortunately, when you don't have one company controlling the entire market, it is really hard to rob Peter to pay Paul.

  11. Not big news by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 4, Informative
    I remember similar things going on in England. As I remember it, there was a big fight going on about who should get what part of the reciprocal payments for customers using the service. This was a couple of years ago.

    The real fact of the matter is that the service isn't free.. It's just being paid for through your phone bill.

    Because I get my ADSL from my phone company (Telus) I can also pay for it through my phone bill... Does this mean that I'm getting my ADSL for free too?

    (at $40CAN/month ($25US) for 1.5megabit down and 500kbit up, some people might claim that I really do)

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  12. Re:That doesn't sound very free.. by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

    Ok so how is this free? because guess what folks, most of Europe does this as well. The only difference is that Egypt has a monopoly on the local telephone system.

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  13. I'll take unlmited free local calling any day... by aquarian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of the biggest enablers of commerce in the US is that we can just pick up the phone and yak without thinking about the cost. Letting your fingers do the walking can be quite expensive in many countries. While low cost internet access is a nice thing, low cost everyday phone service is far more important. I'll take free, unlimited local calling any day, then gladly pay $20/month for internet access if need be.

  14. yeah, but... by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    ...free local calling plus paying $20/mo for internet access still comes out cheaper for any serious usage. So the Egyptians are still getting screwed (then again, so is much of Europe).

  15. Not Free by mc6809e · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is a state-owned monopoly telephone system that is very profitable. In essence, the state is providing "free" internet access by over-charging everyone else for telephone service.

    This is really a strategy by the State of Egypt to keep itself firmly in control of the Internet in the country. The deals with local ISP's to split the money are just to ensure the ISP's loyalty. They are being bought by the state.

  16. The view from the trenches in Ireland by afflatus_com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here in Ireland, all dialup Internet access is this type of "free", in which you are billed for the phone time online.

    For the phone company and ISPs, this "Free" Internet Access Is Profitable In Ireland, also.

    Few people like it, and would rush to support the other side of the fence, in which there is a flat rate of about $40 euro a month for dialup, and that is it (following the typical unmetered approach available in most of North America). An option of pay-for-phonecall is good, but when the phone company colludes with ISPs to make it the only option available, it cripples the country's online growth.

    The largest ISP in Ireland is IrelandOnline(IOL).
    The nexus of protest against this forced free-but-pay-for-the-phonecall scam is logically located at IrelandOffline.org

    --

    -----
    Cast a Cold Eye
    On Life, on Death
    Horseman, pass by
    --W.B. Yeats' gravestone
    1. Re:The view from the trenches in Ireland by Animats · · Score: 2
      At least Ireland now has a reasonable phone system.

      As late as 1985, it took three manual operators to get a voice call through from moderately remote spots in Ireland to the outside world. Regular phone calls were still going through cord boards. But Telex, the teletype-based message system, worked well. Some people were putting in Telex terminals (big mechanical teletype machines) in farm houses in the middle of nowhere so they could communicate with their neighbors.

  17. Poland by jfedor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In Poland, we've had "free" dial-up like this for about five years now.

    But I wouldn't call it free in the presence of people that still are in this dial-up hell if I were you.

    -jfedor

  18. Re:$180 per month for 24/7? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2

    If you have a 24/7 need (ie, running a server) you probably won't use dialup anyway.

    Although I 100% agree with you, I'm on 56gay and my line is up 24/7. I pay $178US a year. I can run whatever I want (yea, it's just a modem but, still...). I run SSH, my own mail, etc. And anytime anyone in the household sits down to a machine on the LAN, the Internet will be there. Anytime I need to check on my LAN or need a 100% external connection from work for testing or something, it's there. Granted I happen to have a pretty damn good ISP (I only get hung up on every 1.5 to 2 weeks (yes, seriously).

    The point is, what I pay a year is what (roughly) these folks over there would pay a month.

    OUCH!

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  19. Re:England uses this model as well by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 2
    Indeed, while freeserve wasn't the first to use this model, they were the first to do it in a big way. Within a few months they became the largest ISP in the UK.

    One big advantage was that they didn't need to have a billing operation at all. Abuse was prevented by severely limiting what you could do if you withheld caller line ID. And they hijacked all outgoing SMTP. They didn't "officially" support Linux, but informally they did.

    It did seem to work well, and they were profitable within a year of starting up. Ultimately, their customers demanded "flat fee, toll-free numbers". Also freeserve got swallowed up by something that got swallowed up, and the people I knew who worked there said it no longer was fun to do so.

    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  20. Slashdot discovers hot water by hysterion · · Score: 5, Informative
    Where have you been?!?

    It's not just Egypt, it's any place with no flat local phone rates, i.e. basically everywhere except North America . Example: it's the standard in Switzerland.

    (See also Estonia, Brazil, Portugal, India, Ireland, Argentina, Guatemala, England, Poland, ...)

    Slashdot editors need to get out more.

  21. Re:I'll take unlmited free local calling any day.. by be-fan · · Score: 2

    yak without thinking about the cost
    >>>>>>>>>
    Note to self: After ascending to high-dictatorship of the universe, raise phone rates. It will decrease the general stupidity of the population.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  22. Re:I'll take unlmited free local calling any day.. by kliklik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you decrease the general stupidity of the population, they are going to fight against the high-dictatorship of the universe...

    --
    guru in training
  23. Why Single out Egypt? by evilviper · · Score: 5, Informative

    Free Internet can work anywhere that people are already paying per-minute for local phone calls. It doesn't work in the US where unlimited local calls are free.

    I think it would be more appropriate to call it "Free Internet Fails in USA, works everywhere else"

    Anyone know why Egypt is getting singled out?

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  24. Re:I'll take unlmited free local calling any day.. by sirinek · · Score: 2

    Not all places in the US are that lucky to have flat rate unlimited calling. I can think of 8 million poor saps with SBC/Ameritech in the Chicago area who dont....

  25. Re: NO Free internet access at college by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    Trust me, you pay for access at college.

    Trust me, you pay for access in Egypt as well.

    There is free dial-up but you have to pay for phone usage.

    I don't get it. If you have to pay, then it's not free.

  26. 25 Cents US = 1.15 Egyptian Pounds by mumkin · · Score: 2

    The Egyptian Pound (LE) had been pegged at almost exactly 1/3 of a dollar for a long long time, but I look now and see that it's shot up to $1 = 4.65LE. Thus 25 = 1.15LE (approx). It's been about 10 years since I lived there... what does an Egyptian Pound buy you these days? Anyone on the ground in Cairo care to comment?

    Looking for current data on income, the world bank cites a figure of $1,490 for Gross National Income per capita in 2000. So, that's about 6700LE. Africare says it's more like $3,420 (=15,903LE), but that's "real GDP per capita."

    Getting useful numbers is tricky, especially when you're talking about a country like Egypt that has a vast off-the-books economy going on.

  27. It's even cheaper than a quarter by mumkin · · Score: 2
    Here is the TelecomEgypt page describing their service offering.

    It's 10 pt/6 minutes, or 1 LE/hour, which is $0.22 at today's exchange rate. If you're connecting between midnight and 8 am, it's only 75 pt/hour, or $0.16!

    So, what does a dollar buy you these days? With 07777777, it gets you over 4.5 hours of internet access. Thanks, GegaNet!

    My question is what kind of throughput can you get over the average Egyptian phone line? I somehow doubt that it's a solid 56K from most locations.

  28. Re:Bad Idea by raju1kabir · · Score: 2
    So basically in Egypt, the majority of people, who do not have computers, pay for the internet through normal phone usage, assuming they have phones. This must be true if there is no difference in the phone rate whether you're making a local call or using the internet. Why should people not using the internet provide cheap access for the minority who do?

    You've got it backward.

    Peak dialup internet usage comes about 4 hours later in the day than peak phone usage.

    So the Egyptian phone company has found a way to make use of excess phone network capacity that is required to accommodate daytime usage but which goes underutilized in the evenings.

    This would theoretically make it possible for phone rates to go down.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  29. Re:$180 per month for 24/7? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure if you had to pay $.25 an hour for Internet access, you would have a much more conservative attitude.

    You're damn right I would! I'm not infering different.

    ~

    It was only a few years ago that I was paying $3 an hour for access, and only a few years before that I was dialing up Prodigy long distance for around $6

    I feel very bad for you. I'm with what was called at one time Erols. They got swallowed by RCN a few years ago. I've been paying the same rate for almost 5 years now. I THINK (IIRC), when I signed with Erols, it was like $172US a month. Since RCN grabbed them, it went up to $178US a YEAR. That's $14.83 a month. Dirt cheap. This goes back to around '95 or '96 (I honestly forget when I first signed with them).

    ~

    Even for you, it's more of a luxury than a need.

    Yup. You are right again. It is a luxury; one which I'm getting every cent out of. I have been for a bunch of years now. And to reitterate a previos agreement, yes, I wouldn't be doing this if I was paying hourly.

    ~

    I don't see why this was modded up.

    It wasn't. I post at +2 when I want to... :-)

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  30. Re:Bad Idea by raju1kabir · · Score: 2
    Iteresting theory, but I doubt the $0.25 an hour makes up for the cost of the internet bandwidth the phone company must pay for. At $0.25, you need to be online over 40 hours a month to break the $10 barrier, which is the cheapest an ISP charges in the US. Maybe, Egpyt's getting a great deal on internet bandwidth, but it's more likely other phone users are ultimately paying the internet expenses incurred by the phione company, especially if the number of internet users is small.

    You sound like someone who's never used the internet from Egypt.

    The country shares about as much bandwidth as you could squeeze through a 2400bps modem.

    Internet undercapacity manifests itself with a more graceful degradation than POTS undercapacity. So while it would be politically damaging for the PTT minister to consistently fail to provide dial tone, it's less so to provide slow IP throughput.

    And in any case, apply a little slice of Occam's Razor here. There's no rational reason to believe the PTT would deliberately throw away rare and precious money by subsidizing dialup internet, just so they could get a mention on Slashdot.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS