Slashdot Mirror


AMD Makes 10-Nanometer Transistor

Yorrike writes: "Reuters is reporting that AMD are about to reveal their smallest double-gate transistor to date. From the article: 'The gate of the transistor, across which electrical current flows to turn the switch on, measures 10 nanometers, or 10 billionths of a meter.' The article goes on to suggest that this may lead to a 1 billion transistor chip."

5 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Same. by Perdo · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is the same transistor that IBM was talking about. They are sharing (or stealing) this technology. Electron microscope pictures are of the same transistor.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:Same. by unicron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Intel employee: You built a 10nm transistor! We we're doing that! You must've stolen it!

      AMD employee: You are aware we make the same product, right? Any technological advances either one of us makes, rest assured the other isn't far behind. Surely you don't think you are the only cpu manufacturer interested in reducing transistor size, right?

      Intel employee: I'll shut up now.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  2. Re:I'm confused by Raul654 · · Score: 2, Informative

    IIRC, a human hair is .25 mm in diameter. (.25 thousanths of a meter) The transistors are 10 nanometers (billionths of a meter)

    (.25*10^-3)/(10*10^-9)=25,000 transistors would fit into the diameter of a human hair.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  3. Re:I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Yes. A non-double-gate one :)

  4. Press Release Slants by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's amazing how two press reports on the same breakthrough claim it's significant for entirely different reasons.

    The earlier press release talked, in a half assed way, about the performance benefits. This one talks, in a half assed way, about the reduced size.

    Of course, this happens because whoever digests these things for us unwashed masses doesn't understand what the hell they're talking about.

    And the gate length has much more to do with the performance, not the transistor density, as the transistor density is dominated by the via sizes and interconnect sizes.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.