Slashdot Mirror


The Porn Of Napster

Thomas M Hughes writes "Well, Napster is breathing its last breath. Filing for chapter 7 and slowly dying. Who better than to try and bring it back to life than a porn company? The article claims that the company wishes to use the Napster name to distribute free pornography across the Internet."

27 of 257 comments (clear)

  1. Why do that want Napster... by EvanED · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "'Along with Hollywood and the recording industry, we have become increasingly concerned about the level of copyright infringement inherent in the free peer-to-peer file swapping services,' Prast said."

    If this is true, why would they want to use a brand name that was almost entirely devoted to copyright violation?

    1. Re:Why do that want Napster... by great+throwdini · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would [Private Media] want to use a brand name that was almost entirely devoted to copyright violation?

      Probably for the same reason Bertelsman got involved: brand recognition.

      Alternate theory: PM doesn't want Napster, they want press.

      ps. I think I sampled the statement better yesterday -- who's Prast again? :p

    2. Re:Why do that want Napster... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Because there's no such thing as bad publicity? Even your mother knows what Napster is (was).

      They are making a stock offer for the assets of a company in chapter 7. I can't recall a case in which a bankrupcy court accepted a stock offer for assets of a chapter 7 company. On top of that the stock is not listed so the it is impossible to judge what value the creditors would receive.

      Bascially this is a pure publicity play. There is virtually no chance that the offer would be accepted.

      I don't quite see the pay off, if napster was public and on the verge then an offer of a buyout could cause the stock to rise, allowing someone to dump stock or options at a profit. But with napster in its current situation that can't be the motive. I don't see what publicity for an anonymous holding company does either.

      This could simply be a brainless exec on an ego trip. Or they could be planning to go public themselves.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  2. New meaning... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Funny
    P2P. So what exactly does the P stand for again? It ain't "peer" anymore, thats for sure!

    1. Re:New meaning... by drafalski · · Score: 4, Funny

      The last P...well...that's not that simple
      It's sorta like another way to call a cat a kitten
      It's five little letters that are missin' here

    2. Re:New meaning... by bilbobuggins · · Score: 5, Funny
      I think you mean P2OPP

      sorry, i couldn't resist

    3. Re:New meaning... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 5, Funny

      yeah, well, you know me

  3. It's still copyright infringement... unless.... by tweakt · · Score: 3, Funny
    The porn is free...

    ...and more importantly, open-source :)

  4. Interesting...Private Media's Stock Soared by chip2000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone notice that in the article it mentions a 2.41 stock value and the quote at the foot of the article mentions a ~22% gain (.55)? It's no surprise I suppose considering that the porn industry is a multi-billion dollar one, but still kind of astounding. Another half million for Napster if they accept..

    --

    Logic is the ultimate device.
  5. More Stories by leibnizme · · Score: 3, Informative

    Additional coverage:

    CNN

    SiliconValley

    Yahoo

  6. Re:Free? by marko123 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want to be punished by pornographers, if it means being tied to a post and tickled with feathers by big-breasted blondes. Compare this with being bent over by the RIAA, and having all the CD's I copied for fair use jammed blunt-ways up my butt.

    --
    http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  7. Wow! by istartedi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Free porn? Wow! This is just what the Internet needs! coughUSENETcough.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Couple important bits by Roadmaster · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of people seem to have missed these two quotes from the article:

    "Along with Hollywood and the recording industry, we have become increasingly concerned about the level of copyright infringement inherent in the free peer-to-peer file swapping services,"

    and

    "Private Media claims to own the largest library of adult-oriented content in the world, with global copyrights to the content."

    Assuming they stick to charging users for access to their network and making sure only their content gets "shared", it doesn't look like they'll be shut down by the RIAA, MPAA or sued into the ground for trading content without the adequate rights. Plus, it's not like the MPAA would be too concerned by porn flicks being traded on the service...

    1. Re:Couple important bits by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Private Media claims to own the largest library of adult-oriented content in the world, with global copyrights to the content."

      Somebody at the copyright office has a really cool job.

  10. Re:Free? by Vireo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Read the article. Private wants to use its own copyrighted material as a base.

    [i]Private Media claims to own the largest library of adult-oriented content in the world, with global copyrights to the content.

    "Along with Hollywood and the recording industry, we have become increasingly concerned about the level of copyright infringement inherent in the free peer-to-peer file swapping services," Prast said.[/i]

  11. May prove Napster model by fermion · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It seems to me that this may validate Napster type services as a valid marketing tool. Napster was unable to do this with musics because the RIAA is unwilling to compete in the open market place. They, like sports teams, MS, and other monopolists, know that is often more efficient to purchase lawmakers than actually compete for market share.

    OTOH, the porn industry, which may find it more difficult find (openly) sympathetic legislators, and has a much lower cost of entry, tends to compete vigorously. The porn industry does look for innovative methods to gain market share, to distinguish themselves from the other 600 business card size ads in Hustler. Sometimes this competition leads to Spam, other times it leads to extensive free content in newsgroups, or aggressively priced introductory offers.

    Which means that Private Media Group may actually have the experience, motivation, and cash to make Napster work. This may provide a way to differentiate their product form their competitors. If they are successfull, it will be harder to argue that Napster's only use is for pirating, and further increase evidence that content monopolies are primarily concerned about loss of control.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  12. So, as I predicted... by Mandoric · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... They've finally created Fapster. =D

    (reference to A!THL^WSexy Losers...)

  13. Lameness by autopr0n · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are already a bunch of services claming to bhe the "napster of porn", supposedly trading passwords to porn sites. but in actually they're probably prearranged deals. Give out a 'psudopassword' and let people resubscribe for a higher rate.

    This would probably end up being the same kind of thing. I know this is a bit hypocritical to say, but the online porn world is full of some of the sleaziest people out there. I mean, how much spam is for porn sites? These people will use any deceptive marketing tactics they can to make money, or as they would say '$$'. I remember reading some supposed how-to guide for starting up a porn site, and it explained how to scam search engines. The acted like there was nothing wrong with doing that at all. And of course, these are the people who invented the popup window.

    The most discussing thing, though, is the way they'll put copy up on their sites that totally degrades women, you know, "This fucking bitch wants the cock so bad," etc. Its just, well as I said, discussing.

    I suppose I could theorize that the people who end up going into porn are already willing to throw off morality for profit, (but don't want the legal exposure of, say, being a drug kingpin)

    But anyway, if these guys succeed in buying napster, it'll be a sad day for napster. Not that napster was really that great, but these guys probably don't have any intention of even letting people trade files, but rather simply using the napster trademark some kind of supped-up pay site. (and yeah, the stuff won't be free.)

    One of the things I'd like to do, if autopr0n ever became a big thing, is try to create a place where people can find pornography without all the ridiculous bullshit, Spam, etc. I think porno can be profitable without being incredibly demeaning to the customers and the women who appear in it.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Lameness by dr00g911 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not to knock you (or your site, which has an Asian slant *almost* surpassing my own ;)...

      I think you're missing the point.

      We've already established that pr0n is one of the few ways to make a dependable buck on the net. So I'm taking that as granted.

      (Bear with me...)

      We've already established that Napster's BRAND is capable of pulling in publicity absolutely freaking everywhere... much to the chagrin of those of us who prefered our l337 undergr0und lynx, well... underground.

      What is being purchased and marketed here is a brand. Plain and simple. It may be a way for a corp. to think that they're "legitimizing" the business by buying the brand name, but that's it.

      They're marketing to the same people who have 4 different versions of Gator, Morpheus and other ad/spy/scum/ware loaded because they don't know any better.

      Sheep, all of them. Controlled by the US media and news outlets... (which were both the windfall and downfall of P2P and the "real" Napster, if you guys remember your recent history...)

      These are the same people who use Win because "everyone does," and don't know how to do a bloody thing besides surf the Web and play solitare.

      It's also the largest market on the Web. In the US at least.

      Read up on your PT Barnum quotes.

      I think it's a brilliant marketing move, but a sad epitaph for a service that started out so promisingly, but made the mainstream far before its time.

      --dr00gy

  14. Duh by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Informative

    So one guy/gal buys the "top quality" stuff and then trades it to the rest of the Pornster users for free. How, exactly, does one make money this way?

    Bit rate and file size limitations....

    Was it really that hard to figure out?

    They can also lock out specific files by hash code or something, so unless people downloaded and then reencoded their stuff, it wouldn't be an issue. Of course, people would do this, but that's what the bitrate/filesize limits are for.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  15. Re:Free? by OneFix · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most definitely the RIAA. The porn industry is mostly run by the maffia, so if you lose all your money, consider yourself lucky.

    Oh, and where exactly do you get this kind of information? I'ld really like to know...

    It might seem glamourous to think this, but it's simply not true. The industry runs off of money and profit just like any other industry. The larger magazines/sites/filmmakers can afford to get better models and can also afford to treat their models/photographers/employees better. In actuality, the porn industry co-exists with hollywood/mainstream media...they use similar distribution channels and similar business models.

    If you look at the history of Playboy Enterprises, Larry Flynt Publications (Hustler)...who might I add runs his own Linux-based weblog, and General Media Communications, Inc. (Penthouse). You will find that they are all owned and operated by corporations/individuals and follow the letter of the law...they have to, because they are watched closely by special interest groups.

    And at least in the instance of Hustler, their website is running off of Linux.

  16. Full text of press release by jesser · · Score: 5, Informative
    I downloaded this in PDF format by following links from www.prvt.com. Italics as in original, bold mine.

    Private Media Group Announces Offer for Napster Trademark and napster.com URL

    Barcelona, September 12th, 2002/PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Private Media Group Inc. (Nasdaq: PRVT) a worldwide leader in premium quality adult entertainment products, services and content, today announced that it has made an offer to Napster, Inc. to acquire the Napster trademark and napster.com domain name for one million shares of Private common stock.

    Private's offer, if accepted by Napster, is subject to customary terms and conditions, including approval by the court having jurisdiction over Napster, Inc.'s bankruptcy proceeding.

    With the Napster trademark, Private plans to create a unique peer-to-peer (P2P) environment that would offer the tens of millions of adult consumers worldwide the opportunity to share adult content for free as well as access top quality adult content at a reasonable price.

    Napster is one of the most recognized names in P2P file-swapping services that allow users to trade and download files. At its height, Napster had 84 million users of its software and was the fastest-growing software application ever monitored by online tracking services.

    Charles Prast, President and CEO of Private Media Group stated: "Along with Hollywood and the recording industry, we have become increasingly concerned about the level of copyright infringement inherent in free peer-to-peer file swapping services. It is estimated that up to 35% of all content downloaded from P2P sites is of an adult nature, which raises significant issues both in terms of copyright infringement and lack of controls of access by minors. It is an industry that presently has over 150 million users.

    Mr. Prast continued: "At Private, we feel that there has been an excess of spamming, credit card fraud, abuse of consumer data, and price gouging among many on-line providers of adult content. We intend to use the strength of the Napster trademark to build a community for adults to share content provided by Private and our industry partners.

    "Private has high standards, both from a regulatory and financial perspective with a 37 year track record of legal compliance. Private owns the largest library of quality adult content in the world, global rights to all our content, and strong technological know-how. All of these factors make Private uniquely suited to manage a viable and legal P2P network for consumers of adult content", said Mr. Prast.

    Private Media Group is a leading global adult entertainment company that distributes its content over a wide range of media platforms, including narrow and broadband Internet, DVD and video, magazines, broadcasting and wireless technologies. Private owns the worldwide rights to the largest archive of high quality adult content in the world, which it distributes digitally worldwide and physically in over 35 countries.

    This release contains, in addition to historical information, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which reflect the Company's current judgments of those issues. However, because those statements are forward-looking and apply to future events, they are subject to such risks and uncertainties, which could lead to results materially different than anticipated by the Company.

    For further information about Private Media Group, please contact in Barcelona, Spain:

    PRIVATE MEDIA GROUP
    André F. Ribeiro
    Phone: +34 679 983 772
    E-mail: andre@private.com
    URL: www.prvt.com

    GRUPO ALBIÓN
    Alejandra Moore Mayorga
    Phone: +34 91 531 23 88
    Mobile: +34 670 799 33
    E-mail: amoore@grupoalbion.com

    Please visit our Download Zone, where you can find relevant information relating to this announcement in PDF format: http://www.tresddb.com/gadz/private.html.

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  17. heh by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Heh, well I don't really want to spend my whole life, or even really that much time looking at random porn on the internet.

    One of the reasons that autopr0n doesn't have as many links as some of the other TGPs is that rather then just a simple 5-7 word description, we actually go a bit more in-depth usually. Also, mods need to mark down the properties the image falls under (like Asian, lesbian, etc) so people can search for stuff.

    It takes me like an hour or two to post just 32 links, which is what I try to go for when I'm on the ball.

    (btw, if you're wondering what I mean by "we", I'm talking about myself and the other volunteer moderators for the site. There are like 30 or something, but only about 7 or 8 really active ones.)

    Also, I do try to have a life. I'd like for AP to have a higher volume, though. If you'd like to help out you could sign up as a mod (just email me). And if you're just interested in links, you can look through the thousands that I have sitting in the queue :P

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  18. Will Help Kill the Free Internet. by twitter · · Score: 3, Funny
    Yooo-hooo, where are your morals people? What's all this BS about business models and market share? We're talking about porn. It's the next best thing to slavery that's still legal. We don't want to promote it as freedom or one of the good things free markets can do for you.

    No one wants to be a whore! It's vile exploitation and porn is it's ultimate extension. People pose for those pictures when they have run out of hope and self respect. Think about this hapening to your mother, sister or daughter.

    The internet was not designed for this. It was designed to share computing resources and information, not to sell crap. Those who look at this as a good thing smear all the other causes they are associated with.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Will Help Kill the Free Internet. by ceejayoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not all people do it because they've run out of hope. Some of the big pornstars are millionaires - they could stop anytime they wanted to. Some people like being pornstars.

  19. Re:Free porn? ever hear of USENET? by forkboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    USENET is not a good forum for trading movies/video clips. Assembling a file from 100 parts, each part coming in 60 pieces is horrible. I don't care how automated they've made the USENET browsers file assembly, it still blows. If one little piece doesn't make it through, the entire file is useless. Give me Kazaalite for all my pr0n needs.

    Not to mention P2P is searchable and has multiple sources for a file. You take what your news server gives you on USENET. It's like the difference between watching HBO or going to the video store.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.