Slashdot Mirror


Rings Around Earth From Ancient Meteorites

HorsePunchKid writes "According to an article on CNN (SNL version), ancient meteorites may have glanced off of the surface and shattered, causing rings around the Earth. These rings, which may have persisted for hundreds of thousands of years, could have had a profound effect on the climate in tropical regions, where the rings would block out light from the Sun. Still rather speculative, but the theory may help explain some patterns observed in the geological record. The idea has been around for a while, and some scientists are skeptical."

26 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. Someone has to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    One Ring to rule them all,
    One Ring to find them
    One Ring to bring them all
    And in the darkness bind them.

    1. Re:Someone has to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      How is this offtopic? The article is about rings!

    2. Re:Someone has to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Cockring! ahaha, mine's on-topic too, see?

  2. Where's Will Farrrel? by StringBlade · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    I saw:
    According to an article on CNN (SNL version) [...]
    and thought...Saturday Night Live has a version of this story already?
    --
    ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
  3. Re:Where are you people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  4. whoa by jdkane · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The polarization, or scattering, in that afterglow that the astronomers found was produced when cosmic light last interacted with matter nearly 14 billion years ago, the report said.

    I can not suspend my disbelief about this one. There are too many light sources in space. IMHO, the light from the Big Bang should be travelling away from earth instead of towards it -- How did they see it? If they did see it, how can they even have an inkling that its from the beginnings of the earth -- there are uncountable light sources from space.

    I think somebody needs funding, and somebody has a lot of useless time on their hands.

    I'm looking forward not only to the scientific explanations that follow, but other theories about whether there is a remote chance or not that the people in the article see what they think they are seeing.

  5. heooos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hi, i ams Randy. Come and visut my site on the web. all of the geeks and my brother seanbaby will like my page.

    http://www.geocities.com/randythegreatus/

    -Randy

  6. The interest in earths rings... by Spaaaaaam · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    ...dates back to Taco's childhood. Taco must be gettin h4rd just thinking about all those lovely big rings.

    Take it to 'em, Tacoboi, bust their rings.

  7. CNN shuns Mozilla by bitweever · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Anyone else notice how CNN's webpage now looks auful in Mozilla? What the &$%# did they do to it? Do they look at other browsers?

    1. Re:CNN shuns Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      looks the same to me, asshole.

  8. That reminds me... by ryanvm · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    What does Star Trek's Enterprise have in common with toilet paper?

    They both search the rings of Uranus for Klingons.

    *ba dum tah*

    1. Re:That reminds me... by msheppard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What did Spock find in the toilet?

      The captians log.

      M@

      --
      Krispy Cream is people
  9. Help! Help! I'm being oppressed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Come and see the violence inherent in the system! Someone posted an opinion that I didn't like; I'm being oppressed !

  10. Suggestions re: duplicate postings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Aaam ah leaving this message here as I understands there be retards a posting duplicate articles in this here notice board.

    Aah could do with some more of them thar retards (who be evedintially un-employed, and ahm a guessing un-employable) to be fliping burgers in mah fancy rest-oh-ront chain.

    Apply below.

    Cunty McCunty
    Burger Flipper In Residence
    McCuntalds
    Trollville USA

  11. Re:Weekend Update by Covener · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... Once again proving my theory that Germans love David Hasselhoff.

  12. Re:I still favour the fire theories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    That was gay. And so are you, apparently. Why don't you quick sucking your mother's penis, go outside and suck your neighbor's dog off?

    Yours Truly,
    l33t j03

  13. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Millions of Americans spend their entire lives unable to detect even the most obvious sarcasm. But more than that, their natural self-righteousness leads Yanks to make pretentious rebuttals on the literal meaning of a sarcastic comment. The waste of energy is alarming. I propose that somebody invent a sarcasmometer at once, and that installation becomes a Federal requirement.

  14. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This comment is stolen from when the article was put on slashdot on Tuesday. Please mod appropriately.

  15. Re:Wrong by hplasm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yay. Well said,droog.

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  16. Re:I still favour the fire theories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Could you stop riding my jock please? It is obvious to anyone with any sense that your post was not penned by me, it is weak and lacks my regular furious tone.

    Shit for brains.

    Fuck you,
    l33t j03

  17. Re:Wrong by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This is right on the line between the Slashdot-Troll and the Slashdot-Humans-Destroy-Everything-We're-Evil-And- Must-Be-Destroyed posts...

    But I can't tell which...

    --
    Wiwi
    "I trust in my abilities,
    but I want more then they offer"
  18. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    what of it, it's just as interesting as it was back then.

  19. Re:Repost from Tuesday (OT) by HorsePunchKid · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    My apologies. I didn't see the older story. I suppose I could have done a search before I submitted, but then... couldn't the editors have? *sigh* Thanks for the link, in any case.

    --
    Steven N. Severinghaus
  20. Re:So... by soegoe · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    "In Googlis non est, ergo non est."

    In fact, depending on the Latin nominative of "Google", this should be...

    • [from "Googlus" or "Googlum"] In Googlo non est (most probable solution is "Googlum", I think)
    • [from "Googla"] In Googla non est (if you prefer a female Google)
    • [from "Googlis" or "Googles"] In Google / Googli non est (if you're a fan of the more exotic declination classes)
    Unless, of course, your version of the Internet contains several Googles... (Alright, there are google.com, google.de, google.fr, ..., Google Groups...).
  21. Re:Austria Rewlz ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Wow, how appropriate! (text under sign means "Please, not so fast!")

  22. Re:Billy Mays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    That wasn't funny, it was just stupid.