Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft foils Xbox hackers with new Config

randomizer9 writes was among several readers who noted that Microsoft has changed the configs on the XBox and really messed up the hackers who have been trying to coax the box into being divx players, linux boxes, microwave ovens, white noise generators and so on. Kinda doubt the conspiracy angle, but it certainly is annoying.

34 of 433 comments (clear)

  1. Why do you doubt the "conspiracy angle"? by HEbGb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You, of all the people, are giving Microsoft benefit of the doubt?! Not had your coffee yet, Taco?

    Nonsense. If *course* they made changes to the system to foil hackers (described as 'security' chances).

    Even the article says "Microsoft has tried several tactics to discourage such hacks."

    Microsoft has a *LONG* history of doing this sort of thing, going back to the Dr-Dos days. And, for them, it is a legal and legitimate response to a threat on their business model.

    An arms race will ensue..

    1. Re:Why do you doubt the "conspiracy angle"? by cadillactux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now don't get me wrong, I despise Microsoft for it's shady practices as much as the next guy, but really, is this one of those "shady" practices? If you think about it, Microsoft has every right to do this.

      The XBox is thier creation. They put many hours into the design and building of the machine. Okay, how convenient that it runs on x86 hardware. The rest of the programming is thier own.

      I understand that most OSS programmers would likely be willing to let others mess around with thier creations, but look at it from the other point of view.

      Microsoft has clearly, from the beginning, shown that they are in in for the money, and not to let others mess around with their products. As much as many of us do not like the idea of that, It is perfectly legal, and valid. Car makers void warranties if you modify them past a certain point. (besides that is could be unsafe) It is becasue they don't want you messing with their products, and spending money with other after-market compaies.

      When you hack an XBox, and put linux on it, you are now using the box as a computer. You likely won't be playing XBox games on it anymore. Thus, Microsoft is loosing business becasue you are not buying games. True, they are still making money from the box itself, but they still want more, which i guess is thier perogative(sp).

      If you were also in it for the money, and created a very good system, would you want others hacking into it, and possibly loosing business becasue of it. Okay, you are still making money from selling your product, but you want more. That is your choice, and your a FREE (yes, Freedome still exsists in America) to do that.

      Microsoft is simply trying to protect thier products, and business. Yes, we have the right to critisize them for it, and maybe we can make a difference, but by saying "this is illegal, MS can't do this, etc.." I dont think we that the right to say THAT.

      Now, great, I am all for hacking or moding the XBox, but if something goes wrong, it's your fault, and MS has nothing to do with it. Don't blame them for putting DRM in the box, or anything like that. Blame you for not listening to thier warnings about what could happen if you mod it.

      Again, dont get me wrong, I am far from MS's #1 fan, and I dont agree with most of thier practices. They are free to do that. It is one of the great ideals of capitalism. Now, Monopolies are not, but is the XBox really a Monopoly? With the sales of GameCube and PS2 what they are, I would say not. If you really want to have a game system running on x86 hardware that is free for everyone to hack, then be innovative and create one, and sell it.

      I'm not trying to Troll here, and this whole thing is probibly redundant from the last ten Articles on /. I just don't see where all the "illegal" and "this aint right" voices are coming from. There goes my Karma....

      --
      Is this thing on?
    2. Re:Why do you doubt the "conspiracy angle"? by siphoncolder · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Microsoft is simply trying to protect thier products, and business. Yes, we have the right to critisize them for it, and maybe we can make a difference, but by saying "this is illegal, MS can't do this, etc.." I dont think we that the right to say THAT.

      Don't confuse our rights. Of COURSE we can say "this is illegal, MS can't do this, etc..".

      We'd just be wrong.

      --
      i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
  2. They only hurt themselves by PenguinLord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    M$ is probably going to do this everytime they start a new production run. The end result however will be that they are going to end up with a whole series of slightly incompatable versions of the xbox. This will be a support nightmare for developers and will in turn lead to yet another buggy unstable M$ product that we all know and loath.

    1. Re:They only hurt themselves by LordKronos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Series of slightly incompatible versions? For hackers, yes, but for legitimate developers and end users, most likely not. It's very common for systems to get several redesigns in their lifecycle, including things like firmware updates. The original playstation probably went through a half dozen, and it never had any incompatibilities (other than on hacked systems playing modchip-aware games).

    2. Re:They only hurt themselves by karlowfwb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not likely. The changes are mostly on the hardware backend, the developers will probably never know the difference. MS may be evil but they are not stupid. The changes will only affect the 'chippers.

      Now, one might say that the 'chippers will just come out with a new chip everytime MS updates. But wait, lack of customer confidence that the chip will actually work in their box, and the cost of developing and more importantly (and costly) producing the new chips will quickly drive the 'chippers out of business.

      So, the question is: is it worse to sue the 'chippers, or just beat them at their own game?

    3. Re:They only hurt themselves by YE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh cmon. Hardware changes don't mean software incompatibilities. Playstation2 has undergone 7 revisions of the motherboard (AFAIK), even merging two of the chips into one. This hasn't broken the games and hasn't hurt the sales. It's only normal and expected for MS to fight back against hackers. Expect more iterations of the modchips-anti modchip hardware revisions war between MS's Xbox team and the Xbox hackers. (GNU-tradition meaning of "hackers", or mass-media meaning of "hackers", whichever you prefer)

  3. legal and legitimate by AdamBa · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I don't think it is necessary or fair to try to tie this back to alleged stories like ensuring that each release of DOS wouldn't run Lotus 1-2-3. We're not talking about an open environment where anyone could write apps, like on DOS/WIndows. Xbox is a closed system, Microsoft retains complete control over which games are certified for the platform. I'm sure all existing games for the platform will keep running, it's just the mod chips etc. which won't run. So as the poster above said I don't see any reason to think this wasn't done to foil hackers -- but I also don't think they have any right to complain. The new system will get hacked eventually, and the battle will continue.


    - adam

    1. Re:legal and legitimate by necrognome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Try to make on-topic posts please. The issue at hand is whether should be surprised by the following: that Microsoft is making the XBox useful for the only thing that justifies its being sold at a loss - games. How is this in any way anti-competitive? Sony and Nintendo have done the same thing.

      If M$ were to ignore the modders and in effect saturate the markets with below-cost 'doze boxes, such behavior would be startlingly similar to what got the anti-trust ball rolling in the first place.

      --


      Let's get drunk and delete production data!
  4. Interesting move... by back_pages · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Ok, let's fancy that Microsoft has permanently prevented their XBox from being customized by clever consumers.

    I might have bought an XBox if I could use it as a general purpose entertainment device. Now I won't buy one at all. That's an odd way of moving units and increasing your market share.

    I don't think it's that insightful, but people buy stuff if they like what they can do with it. Nobody that I'm aware of has a black market XBox manufacturing plant - every piece of hardware is purchased through Microsoft. Nobody that I'm aware of without an XBox is buying XBox games. If I can't get my hypothetical XBox hacked, I'm not buying one, and I'm sure as hell not buying an XBox game or dozen.

    1. Re:Interesting move... by aao-brad · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So go build a general purpose device and quit whining about this. The Xbox is a gaming console, that's it's main purpose. It has an option to play DVDs. Most people buy the box to play games, NOT to hack them and use it as "entertainment device", as it already is... unless you don't consider video games entertainment.

      So, before you go on making comments about how to move units and increase market share, perhaps you should look at the market they are targetting first. Last time I checked, they were targetting gamers, not hardware hackers.

      --
      "What kind of chip you got in there, a Dorito?" - Weird Al Yankovic
  5. Just get a PS2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    and play your DivX, VCD's run Linux etc etc. Sure it's fun to hack the XBox, but if Microsoft insists on playing idiot games, let them. Just get a PS2..

  6. there's an old dutch proverb by hype7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    where there's a damn about to burst, and it keeps springing leaks. All they do is stick their fingers in the leaks... eventually, they run out of fingers, and start using toes. Then the toes run out.

    Eventually Microsoft will run out of digits (as in the fingers & toes). If you want to keep a system secure, you can't be reactionary. You can't wait for a leak to spring up, and then stick a finger in it.

    And that's part of the whole problem with the MS culture - it's not a problem until it's exploited. Then you fix it. This is the best reason I can give you as to why not to use MS products. 'Cause they don't give a fuck until something's seriously broken. And then, it's too damn late.

    -- james

  7. Re:...But really we are not a lying scummbag Monop by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey MS...do you even remeber that your fortunes are directly linked to the fact that your software runs on the worlds most cutomizable and hackable(in the good sense) hardware platform...hell you console is just a hack of that hardware platform...

    Not quite. Keep in mind that the Xbox is sold at a loss, with gains realized on the sales of games and accessories. Every Xbox sold for hacking around would not generate the income to cover the cost of the console itself. In this case, its understandable that they would do this to discourage further losses.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  8. Re:Application of the word security disturbing. by Mr.+Grimm · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The main reason why it's security is to try to cut back on the pirating of the games that go along with having a modded X-Box so they can start to make back the initial investment of the hardware. They do this so they can stay competitive in the console market with their pricing since all hardware is sold at a loss. If people don't buy the software the money is never made back up. All companies do this, MS just gets more coverage because it's "evil".

    Yes it's your product you bought, but when it's being used to screw with another market, i.e. console prices, then steps should be taken to prevent this as much as possible. I don't want to buy a 500 dollar console just because someone decided they wanted to run Linux on the Box as it's only use.

  9. Re:Figures by CerebusUS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And you can do whatever you want to it... Just don't ask Microsoft (or sony, or nintendo) to give you support in doing it.

    If you buy an xBox just so you can hack it and use it for some purpose other than what Microsoft intended, and then you discover that recent changes to the hardware of said xBox prevent you from doing so, who's the idiot?

    As an (xBox | ps2 | gamecube) hacker, (Microsoft | Sony | Nintendo) owes you one thing only: a machine that will play fully licensed copies of the games for that particular platform.

  10. I don't get it?? by thorsen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The whole point of a console like the X-Box is that they have complete control over what they can do with it. Why on earth should they care if or if not someone uses the box to run something else on?

    Face it guys, the reason the changed something was because they wanted to, and they don't give a shit about caring for the X-Box hackers compatibility. And, might I add, they shouldn't do so. If you want a PC, buy a PC - an X-Box is not a general purpose machine.

    I can't stand MS anymore than most others here, but this story is absolute bullshit. Fight them where the battle is at, not just everywhere.

  11. Re:Application of the word security disturbing. by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I don't want to buy a 500 dollar console just because someone decided they wanted to run Linux on the Box as it's only use.
    Well, if manufacturers start to sell the hardware without losses (hence, a bit more expensive) and sell games without having to make up for losses in hardware (hence, a bit cheaper), and YOU buy lots (above average, including those who don't buy games at all) of those games (i suppose you do, since you disapprove of people buying little or no games for their consoles) then you have to pay LESS as a result. Of course, if the number of games you buy is BELOW average, then you would have to pay more that way, BUT then you are actually profiting of the current practice and shouldn't tell those who do similar to stop.

    --
    --
    Free as in mason.
  12. Re:business model by Quixote · · Score: 5, Insightful
    you're implying that because they sell crippled hardware that they should be able to control what you do with it thereafter.

    By the same token, Microsoft should be able to do anything with the hardware before you've bought it. If, for whatever reason, that prevents you from "hacking" it after you've bought it, then don't buy it!

    Whats good for the gander, is good for the goose.

  13. What's so wrong? by matlokheed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After reading this topic, I have to confess to feeling a little uncomfortable. Most likely it's because of the sudden urge to defend Microsoft here when all rational thought say not to, but here goes anyway.


    1. As far as the changes go, all systems evolve and change as time goes on. Video game systems are no exception. When I was deciding on what videogame systems to get last year, I decided to get Gamecube and PS2. PS2 was established already and wasn't a real decision on how to go about purchasing it. I would go to the local video game store and make the purchase. Easy.


    The Gamecube though was different. I didn't know how availability would be in the US and the big consideration was "hey, maybe I should import". Was it because I'd be able to get the games earlier? Yes and no. It factored in, but the real reason was that console hackers will all tell you one thing: get the system's first release. The original PS2 in Japan had region lockouts easily disabled. I believe that the early Saturns were the easy to Mod ones.


    This isn't really shocking. Console modding is 50% staying one step ahead of the console maker.


    2. Doesn't Microsoft have a generally good track record hardware-wise? Say what you will about the XBox, but it's certainly a pretty system when played (huge and strangely designed, but pretty). I've generally enjoyed a reasonable amount of reliability from Microsoft mice and joysticks. I don't know how it's been for anyone else.


    Sorry. Just needed to get that out.

    --

    "If the good lord had intended us to walk, he wouldn't have invented roller skates." -Willy Wonka

  14. Re:business model by DavidBrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I do agree with you that once you own an X-Box, you should be able to do anything you want with it. But this doesn't mean that Microsoft has to make it easy for you. These boxes are sold for $199 each, less than comparable PC hardware. If people could easily modify the X-Box, then people would buy them for the purpose of having a cheap computer, rather than buy them for the purpose of playing X-Box games - which is what Microsoft wants you to do. So, Microsoft makes it harder to hack the X-Box. Too bad. The only reasonable response isn't to whine about it - it's to hack harder, or give up and don't hack the X-Box. Attacking Microsoft for attempting to prevent the unintended use of its product, which incidentally destroys its business model, is silly.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  15. Re:How is Sony any different? by Geeyzus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If memory serves, Sony made iterative changes to the PS1 over the course of its run, which negated mod chips that worked in earlier 'generations'.

    Also AFAIK, even the uber-friendly Dreamcast wouldn't boot burned CDs after a certain point in production. I believe if the date on the bottom of the dreamcast was before 09/01 (or something like that... I don't remember exactly) you were good to go, otherwise burned CDs might not work.

    I don't see what the big deal is about this either... it's not like they are arresting people for trying to hack the systems, they are just making it more difficult.

    Mark

  16. Re:Figures by CerebusUS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    what I dont expect is for them to use this and other FUD to portray someone who is using his/her own equipemnt as a theif.

    Well, if he/she is chipping his/her xBox to run copied games, then he/she IS a thief.

    but to do it for the sole purpose of keeping people who buy it from uning it any way they see fit is what makes them scumbags..

    There are a LOT of reasons to hate Microsoft. But if you are picking this one, you need to get out more.

    Why would you want to use an xBox as anything other than a console gaming device?

    Everyone talks about how great an xterm a $199 xbox would make... did they not read the stories about the $199 linux boxen being sold at walmart? Go buy one of those for heaven's sake, it'll come with a keyboard and mouse too!

    Oh, wait, I guess then you wouldn't be "stickin' it to the man" or something.

  17. Re:Figures by Rader · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You do own what you purchase. If you bought an old xbox, you can still mod it. IF you bought a new xbox, you can still TRY and mod it.

    What, you think MS should send a step by step guide on how to play free games on it?

    The XBOX is suppose to play games. It still does.

  18. With everything that they know now... by 13Echo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With everything that they know now, the X-Box hackers won't take long to figure out a way to do this. It's always been this way with all consoles. Someone always finds a way.

    Microsoft may have a lot of money, but they aren't going to keep modifying their manufacturing facilities unless it means saving money on production. I doubt that they are going to churn out a drastically different X-Box every month in order to thwart hacks...

  19. OpenBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think that Linux and open source fanatics should put their money where their mouths are. Instead of complaining about Microsoft's "modifications" to the XBox, why not put together a spec for an open gaming platform?

    That way everyone could pool their efforts to make the most hackable, mod-friendly gaming platform in existance. Just adopt a spec and require manufacturers to stick to it. Make a hardware-friendly gaming disto and require compliance. Of course the initial cost would be high, but soon enough alll those teens would be begging mom and dad for one for Christmas / Birthday / whatever.

    Does anyone know of any efforts along these lines?

  20. Re:Application of the word security disturbing. by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The main reason why it's security is to try to cut back on the pirating of the games that go along with having a modded X-Box so they can start to make back the initial investment of the hardware.


    Huh? In what way does this address anything I said in my post?

    Anti-piracy != security. That was my whole point. You haven't addressed that point in the least.

    My gas cap can't be accessed without mangling the flap or hitting a lever inside the car. This effectively prevents people from siphoning my gas or putting stuff in my tank.

    That's security.

    If Honda sold me the car at a loss, but I could only fill up with a special, patented nozzle, only available at connocco that would not be security.

    Yes it's your product you bought, but when it's being used to screw with another market, i.e. console prices, then steps should be taken to prevent this as much as possible. I don't want to buy a 500 dollar console just because someone decided they wanted to run Linux on the Box as it's only use.


    In what way does that bear the slightest relevance to my assertion that we aren't talking about security?

    -Peter
  21. The coming end of modchips by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The era of modchips is almost over. It's already over for the Nintendo GameCube; there are no GameCube modchips that work. That's because the Nintendo GameCube only has one major IC in it, so no key wiring connections are exposed.

    The PS2 and XBox aren't that tightly integrated and have a bigger parts count. (Nintendo makes money on game console hardware while Sony and Microsoft don't. That's why.) But in the next generation, we should expect to see machines that are basically one big chip inside. This will be the end of modchips.

    Yes, it's possible to open up an IC and modify it. The ATI/Nvidia article shows the millions of dollars of equipment needed. But even that doesn't help much. Now that everybody uses boot-time public/private key authentication, even opening up the chip won't get you the private key you'd need to make content that will load on an unmodified box. So far, no one has been able to get an unapproved program to load on an unmodified XBox.

    There won't be backdoors. Read the license agreement for DVD decoder manufacturers.

  22. WalMart PC? feh. by mstyne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem is that $200 hardware from WalMart is exactly that -- $200. It's probably (now this is just a guess) full of cut rate components. Where as from numerous postings of its components across the net, we know that the X-box contains some pretty decent hardware. Also, it's being sold below cost (or at least it -was-), so the worth of the components is actually > $200.

    --
    mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
  23. Re:Figures by Rader · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But the only people they are going to lose are customers are:

    1) People who want to use their XBox to play FREE games.

    2) People who want to hack their Xbox for other reasons.

    Obviously they don't care about #1.
    What I'm surprised about is that people here think they care about #2. What are there... maybe 500,000 people who MIGHT buy an XBox just to hack it? 0.5% of the market? Microsoft wasn't trying to break into the "hackable computer market", they're trying to reach into the 3rd type of customer:

    3) People who pay real $$$ for games.

  24. Re:Application of the word security disturbing. by tc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, obviously the major motivation is to cut software piracy, which is a pretty dubious usage of the word 'security'. On the other hand, another motivation is to increase security for online games - if the box isn't hacked, then games can be more secured against cheaters. Personally, I quite like the idea of playing on a gaming service where people can't cheat (or at least, not as easily).

  25. Re:No, its dumb by EvlG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The rub is that they make up the money on the games (after all how much does a game ACTUALLY cost to make?)

    This comment is terribly uninformed.

    The short answer: it costs millions of dollars to make a game.

    The physical medium (the DVD and package) may only cost a few dollars to reproduce, but the data on that disc costs millions to develop.

  26. Re:No, its dumb by Jezza · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually I used to work in the games industry (okay that was quite sometime ago) so, yeah I know how much it costs.

    But you're forgetting that once you've written it, it's done almost all of your costs are done then. Pressing the DVDs, making the boxes doesn't cost much at all. The market is huge. BUT there is something you're forgetting - Microsost CHARGE all the other developers to get their game onto the XBox. This doesn't cost Microsoft a dime, and they make money on ever one sold.

    Honestly this is how the console business works - that's why consoles are cheap. This isn't just how Microsoft's XBox works it's the same for Nintendo and Sony.

  27. Not quite anything.. by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MS should be able to do anything that doesn't violate (antitrust) law.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.