Chimps, Humans Differ More Then Thought
DrLudicrous writes "CNN is carrying an article about a researcher at CalTech. Biologist Roy Briton undertook a comparison of human and chimp genomes, and came up with a 5% difference, versus the usual 2% cited in the literature. You can read the article
at CNN.
This seems to point out that chimps and humans most likely had a more distant ancestor than thought- but the results also need to be examined and redone by 3rd parties to ensure objectivity. Interesting stuff."
Isn't "Percent difference" completely irrelevant when comparing DNA? I was under the impression that we shared something like 99% of our DNA with invertebrates, plants, and other unexpected, non-humanoid lifeforms.
I am alone, yet I also surf the universal backwash of undifferentiated Being, which is LOVE.