Chimps, Humans Differ More Then Thought
DrLudicrous writes "CNN is carrying an article about a researcher at CalTech. Biologist Roy Briton undertook a comparison of human and chimp genomes, and came up with a 5% difference, versus the usual 2% cited in the literature. You can read the article
at CNN.
This seems to point out that chimps and humans most likely had a more distant ancestor than thought- but the results also need to be examined and redone by 3rd parties to ensure objectivity. Interesting stuff."
Chimpanzees have 48 chromosomes and we have 46. Doesn't that mean that we the genomes are at LEAST 4.167% (2/48) different? Then where did the 2% figure come from in the first place? I realise that having less chromosomes doesn't mean that we dont ahve the same genes, which could be in different places than in a chimp, but doesnt this count as a "difference" too?
Now that there is a baseline sequence for humans, we need to do the same for all the great apes. I would think this would be valuable on a number of levels.
This is why we can't just do the diff, although I would think order of billions would be a bit big on most platforms as well.