Chimps, Humans Differ More Then Thought
DrLudicrous writes "CNN is carrying an article about a researcher at CalTech. Biologist Roy Briton undertook a comparison of human and chimp genomes, and came up with a 5% difference, versus the usual 2% cited in the literature. You can read the article
at CNN.
This seems to point out that chimps and humans most likely had a more distant ancestor than thought- but the results also need to be examined and redone by 3rd parties to ensure objectivity. Interesting stuff."
not to be a troll...
but is it "then thought" or "than thought" ?
THERE IS NO DATA. THERE IS O
that's an extremely optimistic interpretation of the title given the history of the usage of the words 'then' and 'than' on slashdot. if I have one pet peeve with this crowd, it's the inability of an otherwise bright bunch to grasp the basic usage of these two vastly different words.