Slashdot Mirror


OEone New Releases and Review

Mike Potter writes "After our initial launch, we received a ton of requests asking for support for RedHat 7.3 and Mandrake 8.2. OEone is happy to announce that HomeBase DESKTOP is now available as a free download for those two platforms. There's a great review of OEone DESKTOP at Linux Orbit."

46 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. :((( EULA with DRM... by WetCat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That OE wants to install DRManagement module
    with itself.
    No thanks. I do not want to install any DRM crap on my comoputer.
    I did NOT agree with their EULA.

  2. Bought it, used it, dumped it! by BigBir3d · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is just a screwed with install of RedHat, minus some important libraries. Takes forever to start the machine, and it is not nearly as configurable of a desktop as KDE or Gnome, or any number of other "smaller" GUI's.

    1. Re:Bought it, used it, dumped it! by avalys · · Score: 2

      You know, if you're going to bash a piece of software without even using it, get your freaking facts straight.

      OEone is a desktop environment, not a distribution.

      For Christ's sake, you could've figured that out from the Slashdot summary alone!

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  3. Is it an acronym? by Wee · · Score: 2
    Why is "DESKTOP" capitalized? Is it an acronym? While I'm asking, why is ANYWHERE in all caps? SUITE is as well. Why the caps? Is it to make the product names stand out? If so, they do so far too much; it makes the web site hard to read. Not that this is an interview or anything, just curious...

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:Is it an acronym? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you say the name out loud, you are required to shout the word "DESKTOP." It's in the EULA.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Is it an acronym? by blixel · · Score: 2

      I suspect it's to suggest a trademark.

      Psh... that's as lame as the 1-click patent. Sadly though, you are probably right.

  4. No mention of Mandrake 8.2 on the website... by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

    ...yet the announcement tends to indicate that there is a version available for my favorite distro. Does that mean that I can use the RedHat version on my Mandrake system? Or just that I didn't look in the right place?

    I'm really eager to try this. This looks like it could really be useful for my Mom, who's completely computer illiterate but wants to surf the Internet and send e-mail.

    --

    Reminder: find a new sig
    1. Re:No mention of Mandrake 8.2 on the website... by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

      Aha! But it's not on this page. As I said, they seem to say that they have a version for Mandrake, but on the download page it only mentions RedHat...Anyoned tried it on Mandrake yet?

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
  5. plz make it stop!!! by jaxdahl · · Score: 5, Funny

    oh man.. look at this bastardization of Tux, the pengiun we all know and love and hate
    pic here

  6. From the Orbit review: by mstyne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The install script

    lynx -source http://install.oeone.com/ |sh

    is run in a terminal window as root.


    Hahahaha.... NO. What bigger motivation is there for some misguided soul to go buck wild and compromise that server? People will be running remote code as root, hoping to get this shiny new software. Er, no thanks. The review doesn't mention it, but there HAS to be a better way to install it than this.

    --
    mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    1. Re:From the Orbit review: by mstyne · · Score: 2

      Where were you when Gnome and Helixcode were doing this for the past two years?

      I was using KDE.

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    2. Re:From the Orbit review: by matman · · Score: 2

      This is not much different from any downloaded system update. Kernel.org anyone? Sure, you have the opportunity to check signatures, but few desktop users would bother. Bigger distribution tools don't often even do a good job at verification - I don't believe that apt-get even does it (I do love apt-get, however). Most users will take the risk and trust install.oeone.com, for better or worse. Windows users download shareware constantly - people don't seem to have a problem trusting joe-blow server for non-mission-critical machines :)

    3. Re:From the Orbit review: by ari_j · · Score: 2

      Better yet, it includes large chunks of uuencoded executables.

    4. Re:From the Orbit review: by asv108 · · Score: 2

      Well it has seemed to work fine for Ximian for quite some time. I haven't heard about anyone compromising go-gnome.

    5. Re:From the Orbit review: by silvaran · · Score: 2

      How about registering domains like www.oeone.org, www.oone.com, www.oone.com or www.oe-one.com? Any permutations or slight modifications of the original domain would be enough to catch a few users. , this is a horrible way to do things. Whatever happened to the days of downloadable installers? I would expect that people who install Linux would have enough sense to choose a link off a website related to their distribution. This is how Ximian does it on their download page. I think they still provide the old lynx -source http://? | sh method as well.

    6. Re:From the Orbit review: by matman · · Score: 2

      I'm just trying to say that many desktop users put as much trust in most servers they download from.

  7. Re: I'm not sure I see the point.... by timmyf2371 · · Score: 2, Informative
    You're not running the OS on top of the browser. I've used OEOne for two weeks (it's not really my cup of tea) and how it works is this:

    OS (Redhat/Mandrake)
    --> Operating Environment (in this case OEOne. but could be KDE/Gnome/whatever takes your pick)

    Also, it's not running on top of a browser. It's an operating environment which is powered by mozilla (XUL/Gecko/Mail/etc) with what looks like the Abiword plugin for mozilla.

    From my two weeks of testing, that's how it appears to work. Also, I tried numerous times to load or install Mozilla, and it always came up with an error.

    If I'm completely way off base here, let me know and add any relevant info.

    Tim

    --

    Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  8. OEone install experiences by ArmorFiend · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the last year I've moved both my mother, and my father and his girlfriend to linux. My mother I did first, and I set her up with a window-maker/gnome desktop. She's smart, but also lazy and never bothered to learn her way around the linux file system. She always relied on me for support, and never felt like it was "her" computer. That was important to her and she eventually blew $2000 on an iMac with OS X.

    My father and girlfriend don't have the money to burn, and also are more easily befuddled by technology. I set them up with a fresh install of OEOne. What OEOne does well is make you feel like you own your computer. They're so far very happy.

    There is a dark side to OEOne desktop, however. Its not really a prodcut, but a PR attemt to sucker geeks like us into using it and giving it mindshare. It has no built in modem control applet / internet wizard. They've written one for their set top box, but pulled it from desktop, basically to keep it from being a useful product.

    Remember, OEOne is written for grandma, and grandma doesn't ever want to miss a call because she's on the net. She sure doesn't want to be unable to call out because she forgot to power down her comp. The mailbug has a really good connection manager, basically you never know the mailbug uses the modem because it does all its stuff when it senses you're not using the phone.

    The user interface is decent, but a little clunky. Its got a lot of tiny mystery meat icons, scattered in unintuitive locations. They need to pay their graphic designers more or something.

    Overall though its not a bad choice. The lack of a window manager is a big win for newbs. Instead there is a task bar and you swap back and forth between tasks. If the task isn't running it starts it up automatically. This is a good idea. I wonder when the condesending bone heads working on windowmaker will figure this out. :P

    If you don't have the $2k for OS X, but you do have access to a geek willing to spend 3 days installing it, I think I'd recommend OEOne desktop. I worry about their committment to open source, blah blah blah. Not offering free security updates is somewhat worrisome too. Oh well.

    1. Re:OEone install experiences by inthehacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      You get free updates by running oe-update from the command line, and the project is completely open source, with details at http://www.oeone.com/developers/
      Mike

    2. Re:OEone install experiences by GusherJizmac · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Overall though its not a bad choice. The lack of a window manager is a big win for newbs. Instead there is a task bar and you swap back and forth between tasks. If the task isn't running it starts it up automatically. This is a good idea. I wonder when the condesending bone heads working on windowmaker will figure this out. :P

      This is a really important point, and this is the behavior of the oft-maligned OS X Dock. You see application icons in the Dock. You click them to use the application. If the application isn't running, it starts. It almost totally abstracts the user from the concept of which applications are running (much like a Palm interace). I would love to have this on Linux. Seperating out launchers from running tasks just makes no sense to me. You can see the major desktops starting to realize this. Both Windows and Gnome (maybe KDE?) are going towards rolling windows from the same task into the same taskbar entry. Now, if we can just make those entries the launchers (like it sounds like OEOne and OS X do), that would be great!

      --
      http://www.naildrivin5.com/davec
    3. Re:OEone install experiences by spencerogden · · Score: 2

      I think the reason to seperatelaunchers and taskbars is that many users have many more apps than they would run at any given time. The concept you mention, having a button that either starts the app or brings up an already running instance works when you have less than say ten tasks, email, wordprocessing,spreadsheet, browser, etc. But for many people there isn't enough room along the bottom of the desktop to have every app have its own icon. Maybe I am missing something. However I do agree that it is a good idea for computers with a narrow set of tasks.

    4. Re:OEone install experiences by asv108 · · Score: 2

      Yeah have you ever tried running running OSX on an imac with 128 megs of ram? You might as well put windowsXP on a 486. Making a clueless mac zealot look like a retard priceless.

    5. Re:OEone install experiences by GusherJizmac · · Score: 2
      That is true. OS X solves this by showing icons for running apps AND apps you've chosen to be in the Dock. When an app is running, you can right-click and say "Keep in Dock", meaning to keep the icon there for quick reference later. I guess the idea is that you will not have very many applications running at once that you cannot fit all their icons along the bottom, and that you will have much fewer "quick-launch" icons than you would total applications in your system, so the number would be manageable. For apps you rarely run, you wouldn't have a quick-launch icon for it.

      I dunno, I find myself accidentally running apps twice on Windows and Linux, because I go to click on the app's icon in all cases.

      --
      http://www.naildrivin5.com/davec
    6. Re:OEone install experiences by symbolic · · Score: 2

      The user interface is decent, but a little clunky. Its got a lot of tiny mystery meat icons, scattered in unintuitive locations. They need to pay their graphic designers more or something.

      A small clarification...that's probably exactly what they did, and if it is, they got what they paid for.

    7. Re:OEone install experiences by GusherJizmac · · Score: 2

      Maybe I should check it out again, but the WindowMaker dock was always really hard to use. It was hard to get applications into it that weren't there, and hard to customize. It has been a while for me, though.

      --
      http://www.naildrivin5.com/davec
  9. Sounds like... by jukal · · Score: 2
    ...windows marketing speech.

    Powerful, easy to use, with unparalleled functionality - what more can you ask for in an Operating Environment? More than a standard operating system.

  10. Somebody please explain this to me... by psxndc · · Score: 2
    Why a startup like this can offer 100 MB of space for $19.95 USD/year and a giant like Apple charges $100 USD/year for .Mac. Remote, hosted backups is to me what is most valuable. I realize these guys don't do website hosting/publishing like .Mac, but does it really cost the extra $80 to do so, Apple?

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    1. Re:Somebody please explain this to me... by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

      They're doing it all on $5k Xserve boxes, instead of $500 x86 whiteboxes. Considering that, you're getting a bargain. The $5k servers are justified because it's so much easier for them to administrate.

    2. Re:Somebody please explain this to me... by Pengo · · Score: 2

      .MAC is an accessorization to their hardware sales.

      If your dumping $2.5k into a machine, whats another hundred bucks that make better use of your iApps.

      I personally won't be splurdging on it as I have already got a dedicated unix server I use for email, webhosting, developoment, etc. I suppose if I didn't have that, maybe I would consider it.

    3. Re:Somebody please explain this to me... by benedict · · Score: 2

      Ask yourself two questions:

      1) Why is Apple a "giant"?
      2) What are this startup's chances of being
      around in five years?

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
  11. Reviewer by abigor · · Score: 3, Funny

    The fact that it was reviewed by a guy named Gonzo John certainly lends it an air of credibility.

    1. Re:Reviewer by Darmox · · Score: 2, Funny
      Could be really cool if it was by Dr. Gonzo...
      "We has two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half-full of cocaine and a whole galaxy of multicolored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers.... A quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of Budweiser, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls..."
      and a linux desktop to review... We can't stop here, this is daemon country!
      --
      If I was that drunk, I would have remembered it -- H. Simpson
  12. Re::((( EULA with DRM... by Zwack · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read the EULA.

    It doesn't say that you have to use any DRM it says that third party DRM modules may be used with OEOne and that if you do use such third party DRM modules then you are agreeing that OEOne has nothing to do with it.

    In other words "If you want to use something that has DRM and the DRM screws your machine over then take that out on the person who provided you with the DRM not us."

    It seems fair enough to say that to me.

    Doesn't mean that I'm having anything to do with the software though.

    Z.

    --
    -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
  13. You'll still need to request a key, but... by lute3 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The install script's job is to checks to see if your OS is one of the RedHat or Mandrake distros just added to the support list. Once it finishes this validation, it downloads the installer binary. Here its just in case you'd like to try it out on a distro like Gentoo or SuSE.

    installer-rpm-glibc2.2-i386.gz

  14. The search for the perfect desktop boggles my mind by sawilson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's just applications and a way to run
    them. All I do anymore is install kde libs
    and gnome libs, blackbox, bbconf, bbkeys,
    and link to the applications I like/need/etc.
    Too many people hop from one thing to another
    as soon as something new is announced in the
    hopes that it's going to be the next big perfect
    thing instead of taking the time to actually
    learn how to configure what they had.

  15. Re:Open-source... GPL... better. by Vic · · Score: 2

    Major portions are already open-sourced. See:
    http://www.oeone.com/developers/

    Also, you can visit the #penzilla IRC channel on irc.openprojects.net to speak directly to developers.

    And, you can join the development mailing list here:
    https://mail.oeone.com/mailman/listinfo/developers

    Cheers,
    Vic

  16. Re:Versions... by Vic · · Score: 3, Informative

    You didn't hear this from me, but the Mandrake 9 version is just around the corner.

    But don't tell anyone I told you. ;-)

    Cheers,
    Vic

  17. Re:Negatives. by inthehacker · · Score: 2, Informative

    The next major upgrade will include support to resize the environment. That was one of our most requested features after we launched a few weeks ago.
    Mike

  18. Re::((( EULA with DRM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    No. The words are NOT so mild.

    "6. DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ("DRMs"). The Software may include third party DRMs as Plug-in components which are subject to their own license agreements. DRMs are designed to manage and enforce intellectual property rights in digital content purchased over the Internet. You may not take any action to circumvent or defeat the security or content usage rules provided or enforced by either the DRM or the Software. DRMs may be able to revoke your ability to use applicable content. OEone is not responsible for the operation of the DRM in any way, including revocation of your content. OEone is not responsible for any communications to or from any third party DRM provider, or for the collection or use of information by third party DRMs. You consent to the communications enabled and/or performed by the DRM, including automatic updating of the DRM without further notice, despite the provisions of section 5(b). You agree to indemnify and hold harmless OEone for any claim relating to your use of a third party DRM."
    "

    So it claims that it
    1) already may contain DRMs
    2) I should consent to that DRM operations
    3) that DRM modules could update itself.

  19. embedded in my living room PeeCee by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    Ive got a little box I run in the living room - this seems very usefull. With an IM client of some kind, this would be great - browse my home-intranet, send/recieve emails / IM etc... and it looks cool.

    only problem is it "requires" RH - what are the REAL requirements? the bare actual libs etc that it needs?

    Id hate to have to do a whole RH install (w/ SysV init etc) just to drop into this GUI...

    anyone have info?

  20. WHY a desktop like this is needed by |_uke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As I write this I think maybe only one person who has posted actually understands why something like this is not only usefull, but important.

    No most geeks do not need something like this. However you have to consider the fact that, 98 percent of your computer users are not geeks. On top of that, a good chunk of those people can hardly use their computer.

    Example... My grand parents where set up with a computer last year. They love their computer... but they are VERY timid with it. They are afraid to break things.

    Right now they are using windows ME. Actually I think XP might have been a better choice but at the time it was not really an option.

    Many of the things on their desktop, they dont know how to use. Not only that, they dont WANT to figure out what these things do. They would rather spend their time trying to remember how you go about accessing stock quotes, or reading email than learning new functionality.

    What most people dont understand is the fact that things like window management is intimidateing! Why do I need to worry about what size some window is... how I make it full screen... how to get it back once I clicked some button and made it disapear!

    The idea behind OEone's desktop is not actually a new one. However it is quite a good idea. (and urgh... Microsoft is in the process of developing their own version of this... they have been for a while actually.) The user should not need to know which applications do what... let alone know how to MANAGE the applications, Instead the user is presented with documents and tasks. If the user wants to browse a web page... thats all they should have to deal with. The web page should become their interface. If the user wants to make a document, their computer nees to BE a word processor.

    Anyways, sorry for being a bit ranty. I did not sleep at all last night and Im quite tired =)

    --
    Luke
  21. It *is* free by Vic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate repeating myself on Slashdot, but please check OEone's open source release page:
    http://www.oeone.com/developers/

    Source code is available via anonymous CVS. OEone also has an IRC channel (#penzilla on irc.openprojects.net) and a developers mailing list:
    https://mail.oeone.com/mailman/listinfo/developers

    Cheers,
    Vic

  22. Re:I'm not sure I see the point.... by Gerv · · Score: 2

    I think I'll stick with KDE for now.

    If you're the sort of person who reads Slashdot, then OEOne Homebase isn't for you anyway. This is your grandmother's Linux UI. And it's very good at removing complexity while retaining power.

    Gerv

  23. Re:oeone by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2

    That's bollocks, and I hope it gets modded as a troll. Actually OEone have contributed loads back to the community, for instance take the Calendar component of Mozilla - their code, they have somebody paid to hack on it. They've also contributed LOTS of bugfixes to Mozilla itself.

  24. Re::((( EULA with DRM... by Peter+Harris · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... I realized that they are trying to defend theirselves legally from DRM module suppliers' wraith ...
    I knew DRM was evil. Now companies using it are sending out their undead minions to enforce the EULA. If it was just zombies or even ghouls, we would be OK I suppose...
    --

    -- What do you need?
    -- Gnus. Lots of Gnus.
  25. Re:Right click? by GusherJizmac · · Score: 2
    There are two ways:

    1) Remove one-button mouse and replace with 2 (or more) button mouse

    2) Ctrl-Click

    --
    http://www.naildrivin5.com/davec