Xiph.org Releases Theora Alpha One
Pajama Crisis writes "Xiph.org, the crazy guys behind Ogg Vorbis, have released the first alpha version of Ogg Theora, an open video codec. Downloading, hacking and smashing into little pieces is cheerfully encouraged. Theora has been mentioned on Slashdot before. Also, Xiph has been working with a couple different companies to bring Vorbis to a portable near you; stay tuned."
How well does this thing compare to stuff like mpeg4? How well does it stream?
If we need a killer on video formats, it better be a damn high compression ratio...
If Ogg Vorbis are .ogg files, what are they going to call Ogg Theora files?
.vog and .tog?
.ogg files to it and determines whether it can read it or not.
Are we gonna have to change them to
Or, are they going to make all decoders smart so you send all
(And yes, I know..very FEW operating systems base their file associations on the extension. However, it does happen.)
...whether or not it's better than DivX/MPEG4, only that that would be its main competition. Does that mean that they're banking on the fact that they'll never start charging licensing fees, but they're not *quite* as good as DivX? Or that they're just as good, if not better, but are going to let the people make up their own minds?
Either way, I'm stoked. Ever since I discovered Ogg Vorbis, I haven't regretted it and haven't looked back since. Hopefully I'll be able to say the same about Ogg Theora.
likewise, OGG could stand a better chance as an audio codec if an insert-and-be-done program were made. Windows Media Player (and iTunes) has this feature for CD's. You stick it in, it gets the track names and rips it. Match that with a P2P client, and it could get adopted just for downloading ease. If everyone were using the same program, files that were the same would have the same names, which would make it much easier to download a whole album, or switch from one peer to another mid-download, thus reducing download time and bandwidth usage.
"Thanks for your suggestion. Actually iRiver have listened to our users' need and start working with Ogg Vorbis format, ManPower have been allocated to develop the Ogg Vorbis, let's give our engineers more time to develop this format. Some users suggested to give a schedule on this issue. However, it is really difficult to tell at this moment, let's just hope it to be released as soon as possible."
d x=1268&mode=Àüü&strque=&field=1
http://www.iriver.com/user/user_view.asp?page=1&i
Thats clipped from their forums.
Yet another name to insure that Ogg is completely unmarketable!
Yes, it's a blog. Sorry if that offends you.
Evidently oblivion exists at www.mplayerhq.hu. They have an encoder that lets you rip your dvd to DivX4 using 1, 2 or 3 pass encoding. Instuctions are here. Is three lines at a command prompt simple enough?
"Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
I've been talking to the Xiph guys, it's true, I believe Monty himself will be starting work on a flash for the NEXII/IIe within a couple weeks, if it turns out to be technically possible.
Sweet! I don't see why it wouldn't be technically possible though? What's in one of those NEXII(e) anyways? Or is it possibly the firmware size won't fit? Anyone know how big the flash ROM for the firmware is?
AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
The vp3 video codec was released to open source by on2 technology mainly because its image quality was noticable worse then (divx 5.0, Xvid ,wmv8).
They tried to get some publicity while selling the succesor.,vp4 (or 5), which isnt open sourced.
Any improvement to bring it on the same level as xvid or divx would just retrace on2's steps of progress.
How can OGG be sure that they wont violate patents in this process?
HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
I think the parent is a troll, but in case he is
serious:
What does a square wave do to your speakers?
We have some decent peakers down in our lab,
because we do vibration testing before real
experiments run and we run all kinds of sharp
looking waveforms thru them and we don't see
any problems. This is in fixed setup, inside an
acoustic room with acoustic level meters and
accelerometers. Doesn't get any more precise than
that. Our speakers are fine after 5 years.
What's supposed to be the problem?