Isn't this why we have web standards? If you adhere to the damned standards, doesn't the rendering engine become all about performance instead of which one looks better, or renders "more correctlyer"?
I seriously, seriously hope my sarcasm meter's broken, because you can't possibly be serious when saying something as reprehensibly stupid as "So, yes, there is a legal obligation to check your inbox on a regular basis". That's the reason you posted as an AC, right? Because you didn't want this coming back to your actual/. account?
You just KNOW that the original name for the device was "Traveling Wave Amplified Tube" until some NASA jackass noticed the acronym and ruined it for everyone.
"the DVDs it makes will only be playable on the computer where they were created"
Doesn't this make it *not* an actual DVD, but rather an encoded video on a disc that just happens to be shaped like a DVD with the capacity of a DVD? Kind of like how all those DRM'd CDs can't actually be called "compact discs" because they don't adhere to the red book standard?
one of the claims that RDR/SVA made was that by tolerating it, she was authorizing it.
She used it as a resource! She wasn't "tolerating it" - she actively engaged it as a reference tool...which is precisely what she's being with this lawsuit.
...but wasn't the Ultimate Question "What is six times nine?" - thus proving that something is fundamentally broken with the universe? I remember these from the radio scripts, which were the first incarnation of HHGTTG.
Slashdot Mirror
Insightful? Really? I mean...yeah, that's always an option to the consumer but this isn't exactly an insightful tidbit of information.
And they would be called out that, just like you were.
But how does Energizer feel now, with egg on their faces?
Well, I'd say the yolk's on them for sure.
Holy hell, someone else who remembers/is a fan of TKK?
No.
If you're interested in helping, check out http://www.haystacknetwork.com/.
Yes, and I'm not ashamed to admit it. =)
Look at all those 3 and 4 digit UIDs!
Heidi Montag?
Isn't this why we have web standards? If you adhere to the damned standards, doesn't the rendering engine become all about performance instead of which one looks better, or renders "more correctlyer"?
I seriously, seriously hope my sarcasm meter's broken, because you can't possibly be serious when saying something as reprehensibly stupid as "So, yes, there is a legal obligation to check your inbox on a regular basis". That's the reason you posted as an AC, right? Because you didn't want this coming back to your actual /. account?
I mean, when a program goes so long without being updated, touched, or improved upon in any way shape or form, it's gotta be public domain, right?
You just KNOW that the original name for the device was "Traveling Wave Amplified Tube" until some NASA jackass noticed the acronym and ruined it for everyone.
"I carry a variety of cards with 'valid' CC and expiration dates."
No you don't.
"What's next - a patent for Verizon for blocking cellphone usage during movies?"
DON'T. GIVE THEM. IDEAS.
The whole Google-Bomb idea was nice, but every link on this page is nofollow'd. Not gonna do any good.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS08-067.mspx
Nice. I'd mod you up, but...well....you know.
"the DVDs it makes will only be playable on the computer where they were created"
Doesn't this make it *not* an actual DVD, but rather an encoded video on a disc that just happens to be shaped like a DVD with the capacity of a DVD? Kind of like how all those DRM'd CDs can't actually be called "compact discs" because they don't adhere to the red book standard?
one of the claims that RDR/SVA made was that by tolerating it, she was authorizing it.
She used it as a resource! She wasn't "tolerating it" - she actively engaged it as a reference tool...which is precisely what she's being with this lawsuit.
Hey, check that out.
Huh.
My apologies - apparently, my due diligence was not due enough.
Thanks!
The book covers PHP versions 5 and 6. Do they know something we don't? Isn't PHP5 the most recent version?
...but wasn't the Ultimate Question "What is six times nine?" - thus proving that something is fundamentally broken with the universe? I remember these from the radio scripts, which were the first incarnation of HHGTTG.
It's called a recursive acronym. Thanks for playing though.
Yeah, but can you imagine the legal precedent that would set?
"I find in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of one blowjob." *bangs gavel*
The number of lawsuits (and chap stick sales) would skyrocket!