Slashdot Mirror


Controlling Robots with the Mind

loucura! writes "Scientific American has a fairly technical article on the real-time control of robotic limbs using recorded neuron patterns. The researcher's macaque has simultaneously controlled two robotic arms in addition to its own arm motion. The amazing thing? One of the arms was 600 miles away. So, they transmitted and translated the "commands" into motion in less than 300 milliseconds!" It's still a long ways off from helping the disabled or making a Dr. Octopus suit, but the potential uses are pretty cool.

95 comments

  1. Monsters from the ID! by hedley · · Score: 1

    Just like in Forbidden Planet. We can try out our subconcious minds controlling these robots!

  2. Cool! by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 0

    Soon a bunch of HPB Counter-Strike addicts will be wired into computers, Matrix-style, and will be commanding T800 robots into 21st century urban combat in the middle east!

    1. Re:Cool! by syntaxofinsanity · · Score: 1

      Ya know, my friend and I were just talking about something like this. (The first part, not the latter ;)) That is, VR would be so much more practical if the game responds to neurological pulses instead of physical reaction. That way the fat nerds will be able to game equally. (Otherwise, the athletic people will overstep their boundaries into the nerddom, fuckers.)

      --
      (to the forgiving moderators: i'm aware that my posts may digress from...yeah, basically anything, so fuck off)
  3. Forget robot arms... by elodan · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can't these people see the potential for robotic genitalia?
    Add some good feedback and you could be boning your g.f while you're 600 miles away! :-)

  4. Hmm... A little old by bpb213 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I read this on Robots.net 12 days ago.
    Little slow /.?

    (-1 /. critisizing)

    --

    This .sig looking for creative and witty saying.
    1. Re:Hmm... A little old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you didn't share?

  5. Computer control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure it would be neat and all to have artificial limbs or a bad ass set of robotic armor, and it would be even cooler to have a Matrix style, jack into your computer interface, but for now i would be happy for something that lets me move my laptop pointer around the screen better than this morphodite little nipple thing above my "B" key.

  6. You're kidding me, right?! by ZigMonty · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The amazing thing? One of the arms was 600 miles away.

    No, the amazing thing was that they successfully decoded the neural impulses of the monkey's motor cortex and generated commands that drove a robotic arm in sync with the monkey's arm.

    Who gives a shit if they also sent those signals 600 miles away? Let me introduce you to something called the Internet...

    1. Re:You're kidding me, right?! by theRhinoceros · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Later mathematical analyses revealed that the accuracy of the robot movements was roughly proportional to the number of neurons recorded, but this linear relation began to taper off as the number increased. By sampling 100 neurons we could create robot hand trajectories that were about 70 percent similar to those the monkeys produced. Further analysis estimated that to achieve 95 percent accuracy in the prediction of one-dimensional hand movements, as few as 500 to 700 neurons would suffice, depending on which brain regions we sampled. We are now calculating the number of neurons that would be needed for highly accurate three-dimensional movements. We suspect the total will again be in the hundreds, not thousands.

      This part amazes me above all the other facts in the article: 100 neurons was all it took to get ~70% similarity in action. That seems (at least to me) to be an incredibly small number and says a great deal about signal redundancy in the human brain. Cool.

    2. Re:You're kidding me, right?! by ZigMonty · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yep.

      Another thing that amazed me was the adaptability that the animals showed. I am really starting to think that we greatly underestimate their intelligence. It reminds me of the treatment of immigrants: they can't speak English, therefore they are stupid. I personally can't detect or understand the scent signals that many animals use. With the huge amount of redundancy apparently in the brain, is comparing brain size all that accurate? Maybe we just have more redundancy than other primates and our technological progress is solely due to the sophisticated languages and writing systems we have developed. I still don't believe that yet, but I think the perceived differences between us and other higher level animals will shrink as we learn more.

      Of course I'm just a layman who happens to have an interest in this topic.

    3. Re:You're kidding me, right?! by Illserve · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Apes are certainly physiologically equipped to build their own society. They have the digits to construct things, they have the basic insights into using tools and they have very rudimentary language capabilities.

      They're just too stupid.

      The ability to adapt in impressive ways is just the way the brain is wired up and says little about their intelligence. Even rats often come up with impressive tricks to shortcut their way to a reward that the experimenters hadn't thought of. It doesn't make the rats sentient or smarter than the scientist, it just means they are very efficient at picking up correlations in the environment in the same way a computer might if it were designed to do so.

      What sets us apart is our language and sentience. It is not a mundane detail, nor is it something that can be taught to apes at a better than 4 year old level.

      Now, you can argue that it's wrong to experiment on them, I'm not defending or proposing animal experimentation, I'm just stating a fact, on the scale of humans, with or without language, apes are just plain stupid.

      Remove humans from earth and fast forward 5 million years and chimps could very likely evolve into a human-like species (again), but they're nowhere close yet.

      And yes, it's legitimate to compare brain volume. Brain volume allows manual coordination, executive decision making, memory, image processing. Discounting brain volume puts you dangerously close to separating mind from brain, and if you want to go down that road, I surrender.

    4. Re:You're kidding me, right?! by Illserve · · Score: 2

      It's that 30% that really makes a difference. A 30% jitter in hand movement turns a brain surgeon into a useless wreck.

      And that 30% is extremely expensive. Don't think that they could capture it just by samping an extra 30 neurons. The #of neurons required to increase the fidelity of a signal increases in a highly nonlinear fashion.

    5. Re:You're kidding me, right?! by glwtta · · Score: 2
      Remove humans from earth and fast forward 5 million years and chimps could very likely evolve into a human-like species (again), but they're nowhere close yet.

      Once more, and I hope everyone is paying attention this time - humans did not evolve from apes; apes and humans have common ancestry. "We come from monkeys" is a very inadequate simplification of the theory of evolution.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    6. Re:You're kidding me, right?! by ZigMonty · · Score: 2

      Apes are certainly physiologically equipped to build their own society. They have the digits to construct things, they have the basic insights into using tools and they have very rudimentary language capabilities.

      Many animals will make tools to help them get food. This was once thought to be the domain of humans only. What if apes keep inventing tools, but because an ape can only discover a new tool by inventing it or mimicking another ape (due to the lack of sophisticated language), the knowledge doesn't spread far and eventually dies out. There is no evidence to suggest that other primates in the past didn't invent the spear or the bow and arrow. Are you really so sure that you would have invented the spear independently if you hadn't heard about it?

      Like I said, I don't believe that they are our intellectual equals. I merely said that I think we're underestimating them.

    7. Re:You're kidding me, right?! by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Simple tool use is instinctual in many animals, but yeah, you need language to pass down complex tool making memes. It's hard to imagine how constructing a bow and arrow could end up encoded in genes to be hardcoded in the developed brain and expressed as instinct later on.

      Instinct and imitation only go so far.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    8. Re:You're kidding me, right?! by Morth · · Score: 1

      And yes, it's legitimate to compare brain volume. Brain volume allows manual coordination, executive decision making, memory, image processing. Discounting brain volume puts you dangerously close to separating mind from brain, and if you want to go down that road, I surrender.


      Looking back ~40k years in Europe we find the Neanderthals, who'd been living here for at least 160k years. Around this time Cro-Magnon (which is us) enters Europe. 10k years later the Neanderthals are extinct.

      Neanderthals was shorter than Cro-Magnon (which is us) but possessed larger hands and did in fact also have larger brains. Evidence show that they were routed out and killed by the Cro-Magnon.

      So how did we manage that? We were smarter, even though our brains were smaller. If you look at the tools the Neanderthals made, they are very simple. Typically it's just a stone with a sharp edge and very general purpose. If you look at the Cro-Magnon tools, you see saws and hammers and drills etc.

      Point being, while brain size might certainly matter, it's not all that does.
  7. 600 miles, who cares? by br0ck · · Score: 2

    I don't understand the fascination with the 600 mile separation. The people who need to control things directly with their neurons are going to be much more interested in manipulating their immediate environment. Anyway, these days aren't the next room and 600 miles pretty much equivalent?

    Two things in this study did strike me as amazing though. One is that the connection has lasted a year. I remember when they first started this the neural connection didn't last long. The other is the fact that the monkey took only a few days to figure out that she didn't have to use her hand and just had to think about moving the lever.

    1. Re:600 miles, who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      The people who don't NEED to control things directly with their neurons but who would WANT to be, say, 600 miles away from where they currently are without actually having to take 8 hours to go through airport security, would find it really neat to be able to plug themselves into a wall and be able to have a physical presence somewhere else.

      (Especially if they ever get those other appendages to work, too...)

    2. Re:600 miles, who cares? by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't understand the fascination with the 600 mile separation. The people who need to control things directly with their neurons are going to be much more interested in manipulating their immediate environment.

      Vacationing parents might care.

      "Dear, my mind nanny is showing that our little Johnny is thinking about throwing a party now that we're away"

      "We'll see about that!" (holds fingers to temples). 600 miles away, thwap!. "That'll show him!"

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
  8. i am your father by fredopalus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "He's more machine now than man. Twisted and evil."--Obi-Wan Kenobi

    --
    Jonahweb.com has stuff.
  9. Finally! by Gefiltefish · · Score: 1


    Finally, I'll be able to type and browse with BOTH hands!

    1. Re:Finally! by Clowning · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was thinking of being able to navigate the web (especially the back button) while using my real hands for something else...

    2. Re:Finally! by morgajel · · Score: 1

      [ALT] + [-] keys
      works in most browsers

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    3. Re:Finally! by morgajel · · Score: 1

      doh, lets try that again
      [ALT] + [<-] keys

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    4. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh... 'using my real hands for something else' ... what pray tell would that be? *smirk*

  10. 600 miles by avandesande · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, 600 hundred miles, that is 100 times more amazing than 6 miles away!

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  11. The Long Arm of Larry Niven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, eventually we'll cover every science fiction and convert them to science fact. This one strongly brings to mind The Long Arm of Gil Hamilton by Larry Niven.

    Bonus reading: Artificial Arm stories

    Let's stop thinking small. Bring on the Lensman!

  12. Have you ever controlled a robot... by Marijuana+al-Shehi · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...WITH YOUR MIND?

    [obscure Mr. Show reference].

    --
    "I think all foreigners should stop interfering in the internal affairs of Iraq"
    -- Paul Wolfowitz, 7/21/2003
    1. Re:Have you ever controlled a robot... by thelexx · · Score: 2

      Sure I have, but have you ever controlled a robot with your mind...ON WEED?

      [super-nonobscure Half-Baked reference]

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  13. So... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 0

    Can I name my robot Arnold? T1000 maybe?

  14. Slashdot 2022 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Robots Controlling The Mind"

    Just wait and see

  15. I wonder... by Ibby · · Score: 1

    If Battlemechs(TM) will be much farther off...

    --
    Karma: Good. I'm hoping in the same way as pizza is 'good'...
    1. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Battlemechs are not very effecient compared to a tank or something similar implemented as something closer to a spider than a humanoid. Too bad because they are cool!

    2. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One Must Fall!!

  16. The loop isn't closed yet... by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At the current time, all they are doing with the robot arms is ape-ing (pun intended) the motion of the monkey's arm - the monkey is NOT using the robot arms to accomplish tasks. Rather, as the monkey uses it own arm to accomplish tasks, the robot arms are making the same motions. The monkey is no more "controlling" two arms in addition to her own than I would be controlling two computers just because I had VNC displaying the same thing on both computers.

    In other experiments the researchers HAVE closed the loop, by using the brain activity to control a cursor on a screen the monkey can see. Thus, the control loop is closed: Screen feeds brain feeds computer feeds screen.

    But until they can close the loop controlling the arm, by providing some form of tactile feedback, the system isn't very useful. That is their next step - closing the loop by stimulating the monkey's skin in proportion to the force the arm is experiencing.

    Now, if they can combine this research with the work being done on rats to stimulate the sensation nerves, then they may have something that can help paraplegics. And given how plastic the brain is - how good the brain is at adapting to its feedback, then there is a good chance we might be able to make useful direct brain controlled limbs.

    1. Re:The loop isn't closed yet... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Now, had you read the article (always a stickly one, that ;) ), you would have read about a rat which could do exactly that (but moving a lever instead of an arm) using just a pattern in it's neurons. They first trained it to manually press the lever, and moved on (read the article for a more detailed description) to the point where the rat just sat there and [b]thought[/b] of the actions necessary to moving the lever, and it was rewarded. No closed loop, true, but a 'recording' of the neural patterns of the movements necessary was made.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    2. Re:The loop isn't closed yet... by blair1q · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I haven't read it.

      Did they do it by measuring muscle response near the muscle, or by measurng neural activity near the spine? Because if it's the latter, you could amputate that monkey's arm, replace it with the waldo, hook it up, and the monkey wouldn't know the difference, grabbing-a-banana wise. He'd just move the arm.

      But then again, maybe they're not recording individual neurons, just some gross wavepatterns, which means it'd be no more "controlling a limb" than letting your dog drive is the Indy 500.

      --Blair

    3. Re:The loop isn't closed yet... by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      Actually, I read the article more thoroughly than you read my post. I was responding to the item that the Slashdot editors and the story submitter had seized upon - the control of the robotic arms, which were completely open loop.

      Indeed, the rat experiment was a closed loop - the rat thought, and could see the results of the thought, i.e. the dispenser fired.

      That is my whole point - IF you close the loop, THEN the brain can learn. The closing of the loop can be by haptic feedback, by visual feedback, by auditory feedback, but in any case the results of the action MUST be communicated back to the brain initiating the action. The monkey wasn't getting feedback from the arms, so the loop wasn't closed.

    4. Re:The loop isn't closed yet... by swillden · · Score: 2

      Did they do it by measuring muscle response near the muscle, or by measurng neural activity near the spine? Because if it's the latter, you could amputate that monkey's arm, replace it with the waldo, hook it up, and the monkey wouldn't know the difference, grabbing-a-banana wise.

      Not likely. Moving your arm and grasping an object requires not only that you control the muscles but also that you get feedback from your arm letting you know the current positions of your joints and the pressure you're currently applying to the surface of the object. Unless the waldo could supply at least a rudimentary form of this feedback, the monkey would have a very difficult time. He could probably learn to do with only visual feedback, but it wouldn't be easy or instinctive.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:The loop isn't closed yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Even better than that -- they implanted very fine wires into the brain to lie alongside a small number of individual neurons. Then they measured the electrical activity of those neurons. We're not talking about reading from the axons in the spinal column, this is straight from the motor cortex.

      The most amazing thing is that a usable signal can be read from so few neurons. Recording from 100 random neurons in the right part of the brain gave a 70%-complete signal, with diminishing returns as more are added. Wiring up brain using no more than a few hundred connections is reasonable enough to be useful!

    6. Re:The loop isn't closed yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are obviously a fuckin idiot who didn't read past the first page. All the other fuckin idiots who modded you plus 4 are REALLY REALLY fuckin idiots.

    7. Re:The loop isn't closed yet... by billbaggins · · Score: 2
      Tactile feedback is in the works. Check out this bit from page 5 of the article.
      In May we began modifying the BMI to give her tactile feedback for new experiments that are now beginning. The BMI will control a nearby robot arm fitted with a gripper that simulates a grasping hand. Force sensors will indicate when the gripper encounters an object and how much force is required to hold it. Tactile feedback--is the object heavy or light, slick or sticky?--will be delivered to a patch on Aurora's skin embedded with small vibrators. Variations in the vibration frequencies should help Aurora figure out how much force the robot arm should apply to, say, pick up a piece of fruit, and to hold it as the robot brings it back to her.
      Not exactly stimulating the sense nerves that are directly involved, but they do at least provide some sort of substitute.
      --
      "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
      --Winston Churchill
    8. Re:The loop isn't closed yet... by Saeger · · Score: 1
      I wonder (and I should google for info), how much progress has been made in connecting up neurons in the visual cortex to look for patterns in the monkey's vision?

      (I want my NVidia OpticNerv Ti4600! ...after the blind people get theirs, of course :)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  17. Too late! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christopher Reeve can already move his fingers!

  18. The price to be paid by ShooterNeo · · Score: 2

    Well, obviously this experiment proves that links between computers and brain tissue are quite possible and usable. In addition, it beats the pants off other experiments...like that one the air force had where human volunteers would try to move a simulator left and right. It took weeks of training for the humans to "train" their brains to give the correct signal most of the time.

    In this case no training seems to be required...you just move your arm and the software is able to translate that. VERY IMPRESSIVE.

    But there is a price to be paid : the monkey is wired with actual hardware in the brain. Face it, the V.R. systems of the future and the cyborgs will have to have actual surgically inserted wiring. To get that cool V.R. rig you'll have to have a major operation installing thousands of tiny wires to the nerves of your body.

    1. Re:The price to be paid by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so?
      Ever read/seen Johnny Mnemonic?
      That's how it works!
      1. Get a socket
      2. Plug in.
      3. Get NAS :-)

      It's what we all should strive for.
      Our own socket in the head!

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  19. Oooops... by Nailer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I actually read that intro as:

    It's still a long ways off from helping the disabled by making a Dr. Octopus suit

    You shoulda seen what I was imagining...

  20. New Era in prostethics by vicious_sloth · · Score: 1

    Towards the end of the article they talk about being able to replace a monkey's arm with a robotic one (by aanesthetizing the monkey's arm) and having it control the robot arm as if it were its own.
    If this does prove to be successful, It could open the door to 'human upgrades' where you could buy mods for yourself, like extra limbs. i could see a huge market for this in construction. Though i know there are alot of other field that would benefit from this, but i wont list them all.

    --
    Sun is Warm, Grass is Green
  21. artificial limbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like a wonderful advance in science for those who are physically impaired/handicapped.

    "to control mechanical and electronic machines purely by "thinking through," or imagining, the motions."
    But what happens when someone wants to think through actions before performing them? Will the robotic limb strike before the time is right, simply because the person is thinking about possibly going about something a certain way?

    On a lighter note, I can just see the new filth ads now: "Buy a mechanical penis! You'll have complete control over it's every movement! Don't ejaculate until you want to!"

  22. Big deal! by rocjoe71 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Controlling robots with the mind? Pfft! I can levitate birds...

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
  23. SciAm PopSci by blair1q · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Last night, I was sitting on the sofa watching the game, and I glanced over and saw this headline on the front of the magazine, and something about wondercars, and another fluffy sensationalist barely scientific come-on.

    And I thought it was the latest issue of Popular Science, which it turned out was was right underneath this issue of Scientific American.

    Seriously. If you covered up the name, and don't have the UPC memorized, you couldn't hope to tell them apart. They used the same layout template for the covers. And maybe for their websites, because both covers are in about the same spot on their home page:

    exhibit A.
    exhibit B.

    Scientific American should never have started taking ads.

    --Blair

    More persistent-looking links to the cover thumbnails:
    sa
    ps

  24. Dumbass Blond on Friends beat ya to it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She found that she could change the channels of a TV just by blinking her eyes. That or she is a scientologist throwing a postulate at the problem.

  25. read the F#$(%$# article!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They later turned off the joystick and the monkey leared that she could sit back and think the action and make it happen.. she stopped moving her arm.

    1. Re:read the F#$(%$# article!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Closing the loop is important. John Donoghue's lab at Brown has done that in its monkey work, and it was published recently (last few months, I think), and is so far the best (IMHO) work towards having the brain control an external interface.

      Nicolelis and Chapin have had huge successes in their rodent implants, but their primate work is still coming. They are extremely technically proficient, and I expect much progress from them.

      The litmus test I would use is if a researcher can implant a primate, teach it to use its brain to control an external interface, and have it work for more than a month with the animal progressively improving. So far, the first has been done by many, the second only by Donoghue, and the third by none. That is the obstacle, and the challenge ahead. Implants are not as easy as rocket science.

  26. think of the pr0n possibilites... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe an extra pair of synchronized arms would have some *ahem* applications

  27. Old News by radoni · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reads like a hype article for the researchers who wrote it. At the end it says:

    "In the two years since that day, our labs and several others have advanced neuroscience, computer science, micr..."

    this was done 2 years ago, guys. it's old news.

    wake up, johnny, i feel a hurricane comin' on!

    --
    SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
    1. Re:Old News by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      This is in the current Scientific American. It is news. A lot of science doesn't get published until a while after the fact (so it can be peer reviewed, etc)

    2. Re:Old News by mike3411 · · Score: 1

      Just because it happens two years ago doesn't not make it news. They need to evaluate, verify, and understand the results, and a number of the experiments have been ongoing in that intervening time. Do you think they're going to get a result from a preliminary experiment and publish it the next day? That's the kind of thing that leads to inaccuracies/lack of checking that has resulted in a few prominent recent examples of scientific misconduct. Sheesh, you yell at them when it's inaccurate, and yell at them when they take the time to verify it.
      You people....

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  28. Why cut out the middleman? by servasius_jr · · Score: 2

    It'd really be much cooler if the monkey controlled the robots with it's mind, and was in turn controlled by me, through marionette strings. It's beyond science; it's art.

    Seriously, though, doesn't this raise the very real potential problem of armies of robots, mechanically flinging monkey poo?

    And imagine a beow . . . Oh, never mind. I'll shut up now.

  29. Its Been Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The only thing original about this article is that the robot is controlled over the internet. Dr. Andrew Schwartz and his collaborators at Arizona State have been doing this type of research longer and much more successfully. It was Schwartz and Georgopoulos who first deciphered the encoding of the motor cortex. It was Schwartz who first controlled a robot using motor cortical signals from a monkey with a free moving arm. Now Nicolelis and his collaborators are taking credit. Its shocking Nicolelis is so unpopular among his peers in the neuroscience community.

    Georgopoulos, A., Schwartz, A., & Kettner, R. (1986). Neuronal population vector coding of movement direction. Science, 233, 1416-19.

    Georgopoulos, A, Lurito, J., Petrides, M., Schwartz, A., & Massey, J. (1989). Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science, 243, 234-236.

    Dawn M. Taylor, Stephen I. Helms Tillery, and Andrew B. Schwartz (2002). Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices. Science, 296: 1829-1832.

  30. Wired Magazine by MxTxL · · Score: 2

    Maybe someone else saw the recent issue of Wired magazine (maybe a month or two back) where some mad scientist-type was able to wire a camera up to a blind patients brain, and through the use of a program that would 'learn' what effects certain signals it would put out on the guys visual cortex had, could then begin to replicate a pretty decent field of vision (albeit at very low resolution).

    Well, it seems that scientists are getting somewhat proficient at interpreting brain signals and even providing direct-to-brain feedback. The reality of this is actually amazing. It's the stuff of science fiction, but immersive systems (the Matrix, anyone?) might not be so far fetched anymore. The stuff from 80's cyberpunk fiction where everyone is walking around with jacks in their heads might not be so far off. But then again, flying cars shouldn't be so far off either but you don't see many of those either.

    1. Re:Wired Magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason you don't see flying cars is because they're too difficult and dangerous to drive, not because they're technically impossible. The average person can barely drive in 2D on land - can you imagine letting Joe Sixpack pilot a flying car over a residential area???

  31. /. time to posting TWO YEARS? by skinfitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article: In the two years since that day,...

    The incident in question happened two years ago - I guess I'm not the only one who submits articles here only to see them "pending" for a long time. But I'm not bitter.

    1. Re:/. time to posting TWO YEARS? by ZigMonty · · Score: 2
      Blame Scientific American not /.

      The article is in the current issue.

  32. Screw this. by tigertigr · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd rather it was "Controlling the Mind with Robots".

  33. Karma for sure by hacksoncode · · Score: 1
    Must... control... CowboyNeal... post... my... articles...


    Damn. This is harder than it seems.

  34. AHHHHH! by fruity1983 · · Score: 1

    wtf is going on!

    All the posts are unnested and I can mod things, I just want nested comments!

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  35. Add extra limbs to your body by Sherloqq · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To me, the most amazing part of the article is on page 5:

    If visual and tactile sensations mimic the information that usually flows between Aurora's own arm and brain, long-term interaction with a BMI could possibly stimulate her brain to incorporate the robot into its representations of her body--schema known to exist in most brain regions. In other words, Aurora's brain might represent this artificial device as another part of her body. Neuronal tissue in her brain might even dedicate itself to operating the robot arm and interpreting its feedback.

    So, not only could you teach your brain to replace a damaged limb with a prosthetic one, but you could potentially teach your brain to operate a totally *new* limb! How cool would that be??

    And the whole idea of remotely controlling limbs makes me think that the concept of Hector from Saturn 3 [www.imdb.com] probably seemed far-fetched at the time, but starts to be less and less so...

    --
    Have EVDO, will travel.
    1. Re:Add extra limbs to your body by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've wanted a third arm for a long time... like Zaphod Beeblebrox!

      Seriously though, extra limbs would be fun, and even useful in some situations, I guess.

  36. The data isn't a clean as the article implies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The data is not as clean as the article implies (typical of Scientific American and science p.r. pulp magazines) and the technology right now will detect only gross patterns, some identical patterns are generated by other intensions and attensions so we have big problems of false positives and of course some give no distinguishing patterns at all. There is the big question whether brain patterns will correlate 100% or even good enough with mental patterns (specificity issues), the literature isn't very good in this regard. I seriously doubt 100% correlation for logical, empirical and ontological reasons, but good enough maybe all that's required.

  37. This is very useful ! by Krapangor · · Score: 1

    If you put a disabled person into an high resolution NMR you can let him control robotics devices so that he can walk around.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  38. Better yet... by ericvids · · Score: 1

    Daimos, or Gundam. ;)

    --
    Pet peeve: Profane people propagating perfunctory pedantry.
    1. Re:Better yet... by xiphos · · Score: 1

      BattleTech! Yes, with the advent of the neurohelm we will find 90 meters IS a sufficient distance for gattling cannon fire, and discover ways to increase bore size and yet somehow DECREASE range in artillary.

      As long as my Locust looks like a Crusher Joe and my Marauder looks like a Glaug, I'll be happy.

      --
      Xiphos
  39. Who cares about the disabled? qjkx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does nobody talk about permanently implanting things onto the body to make normal people much better? That way, the better people can kill everyone else and everybody will be evolved then. It'll happen, it's called evolution.

    1. Re:Who cares about the disabled? qjkx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the cripples suddenly have their mecha suits, their going to be pissed.

      You'll be one of the first against the wall.

  40. This is part of the CIA plot... by Evro · · Score: 1

    ... to get me to stop wearing my brainwave deflecting hat! Sinister indeed...

    --
    rooooar
  41. Imagine... by acoustiq · · Score: 0

    ...a beowulf cluster of these! Seriously. Whoever had such a thing would make a lot of friends very quickly. Just think of what would happen if you made him angry; imagine him being able to attack you with a legion of robot arms 600 miles away.

    --

    --
    I romp with joy in the bookish dark
  42. practical applications by lingqi · · Score: 0
    Our immediate goal is to help a person who has been paralyzed by a neurological disorder or spinal cord injury, but whose motor cortex is spared, to operate a wheelchair or a robotic limb.

    wheel chairs? fsck THAT... I want to control a Gundam, dammit.

    I mean -- that is probabbly the *only* reason to design a big robot in the shape of a human -- so humans can control it with roughly the same movements and feedbacks.

    small side note: that is one UGLY monkey. I mean... can't they find a cuter monkey for experiments like this?

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  43. Killer Monkey robots by t0qer · · Score: 1

    Why do I picture a roomfull of monkeys remotely wired up to some ICBM's deep underground in norad?

    "Sir monkey 211 has located osama bin laden and is going in for the kill!"

    "Give him a bannana!"

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these !

  44. Now that they've decoded it, they can copyright it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the royalties from everyone who ever moves their limbs...

  45. Get those researchers a broadband connection, now! by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The amazing thing? One of the arms was 600 miles away. So, they transmitted and translated the "commands" into motion in less than 300 milliseconds!"

    That sounds very similar to moving a character around in an online game. 300 milliseconds is nothing as far as transmission speed goes. A 300 ping in an online game is awful (even with a 56k modem!) Somehow, I doubt that most of that 300 milliseconds was taken up by transmissing the data 600 miles. More likely, most of that time was actually taken up by computations.

  46. Eh, this was done back in '84 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Dr. Banzai is using a laser to vaporize a pineal tumor without damaging the parthogenital plate. A subcutaneous microphone will allow the patient to transmit verbal instructions to his own brain."

    "Like, 'raise my left arm?'"

    "Or 'throw the harpoon.' People are gonna come from all over. This boy's an Eskimo."

    But I'm sure that in the miserable annals of the earth, this accomplishment will be duly enshrined.

    (sorry)

  47. Something to look forward to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would make those long-distance relationships *much* more enjoyable.

  48. Feedback? (Re:New Era in prostethics) by phorm · · Score: 2

    It would be great to be able to attach artificial limbs that worked right off of one's brainwaves (so long as there wasn't interference or somebody yanking your wire by accident).
    Another important thing they'll need to figure out is how to get and interpret feedback. That is, to allow for the sense of feeling from the hand/etc being moved to be translated back to the brain. I think to some extent it's been done already, and one thing nicer than having a robotic hand would be having a robotic hand you can feel with.

    disclaimer: I claim no responsibility those who respond to this post with comments of a sexual or otherwise immature nature - phorm/I.

  49. Typing by wizardhat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if this technology could be adapted, so that as a person thinks of a letter, the sensors could translate the neuron pattern into an ASCII code. Imagine typing without the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome.

    1. Re:Typing by bytesmythe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Worse, you get carpal BRAIN syndrome... Then where would you be?

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
  50. Try reading the article.... by mike3411 · · Score: 1

    Had you actually read the article, you would have found out that they later hooked up a monkey to control a cursor on the screen via neuronal impulses, and the monkey was able to control it with no physical movement. The article also goes into how this kind of feedback allowed their software to increase its precision.
    In conclusion, RTFA.
    Same goes for you mods that modded up this guy.

    --
    Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  51. Intended delays by mike3411 · · Score: 1

    Delays like that were programmed into the system to compensate for the way neurons worked and communicated, different impulses had to be selectively delayed to perform the desired motion. Didn't really have anything to do with the connection....

    --
    Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  52. Awwww...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "It's still a long ways off from helping the disabled or making a Dr. Octopus suit, but the potential uses are pretty cool."

    Doesn't anyone care about my problems, that happen to be able to be solved with a Dr. Octopus suit?

    Why does science always seem to be against my goals?

  53. one use by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    i can be less worried that my wife would cheat on me because i can still pleasure with my robotic arm miles away on my business trips

  54. Beware of writing buggy software for this one by abhikhurana · · Score: 1

    I just hope that the software which takes in the decoded signal doesn't have a bug. Otherwise U never know, you may intend to shake the hand of the person in front of you, and you may end up punching him on the nose... and to make it worse, when the person tries to hit you back, ur robotic leg refuses to run saying a critical error has ocurred.
    Actually I can think of many other scenarios, but I think you get the picture.

  55. reverse possible ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could detect what a monkey thinks and feed to a robot ! So the reverse would also become possible soon ? Feed electrical signals to the monkey and then monkey moves it's arms accordingly !
    Jeeze ! then we'd capture what one monkey thinks and transport that signals to another monkey sitting faraway ! Then we may progress that to human beings. Oops, one human being thinks & another does the work - sounds terrible.