Slashdot Mirror


Survivor Meets Junkyard Wars for Scientists

MyNameIsFred writes "Stepping back to Gilligan's Island, PBS has a new "reality" show Rough Science where "five scientists are challenged to put their collective scientific knowledge to practical use. Transported to isolated locations, they are presented with a series of tasks, with two notable restrictions: they must complete their work within three days and, with the exception of a rudimentary tool kit, must use only indigenous materials." Could the Professor really build all of those things? We'll soon know." Check out the Episode guide.

168 comments

  1. My prediction.... by Cloud+9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They start voting on which one to eat first within a week. Scientists weren't designed to survive outside of a lab. =]

    --
    Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    1. Re:My prediction.... by goul · · Score: 3, Funny

      As long as they leave enough fat to make soap with on the 10th challenge.

    2. Re:My prediction.... by praedictus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >>Scientists weren't designed to survive outside of a lab. =]

      Hrmff! Obviously someone who hasn't done any REAL (ie. non-theoretical) science. As part of my work I have:
      Slept in a snowbank (ambient temp -30C)

      Scaled ice covered rock faces with 30 kilos of equipment

      Faced bears and wolves unarmed. Mind you most predators only attack if you act like prey, and the wolves were mostly interested in having fun, like 50 kilo puppies with big teeth...

      Hiked alone in the Amazon rain forest.

      Not all scientists are wimps, some of us actually get out once and a while. When something breaks in bush camp, you fix it yourself, with what you have on hand. If you fsck up bad, you might die, so you learn to adapt.

      --
      Watashi wa chikyubutsurigakusha desu.
    3. Re:My prediction.... by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      I have a similar job -- if they had told us more about field work back in junior high, i bet a lot more people would have gotten excited about being scientists...

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    4. Re:My prediction.... by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Slept in a snowbank (ambient temp -30C)
      As someone else who's slept in a snowbank (on purpose!), sorry, but no dice on that one. :)

      Snow is an excellent insulator. Consequently, if you burrow yourself a hole in which to sleep you can find yourself quite warm indeed. It's only when you contact the raw snow with your body, thus melting it and wetting your clothes that you get cold.

      The heat from even the smallest of fires can heat up the interior of a snow-dwelling to quite a comfortable temperature (just be sure to poke a smoke hole in the top).

      The best way to get a boy scout over his fear of snow is to hand him a portable (folding) shovel and tell him to make a home in it for a night or two.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    5. Re:My prediction.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fight Club reference? ;-)

    6. Re:My prediction.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Slept in a snowbank (ambient temp -30C)

      As someone else who's slept in a snowbank (on purpose!), sorry, but no dice on that one. :)

      I imagine our scientist friend is well aware that snow is a good insulator, and refers to "ambient temperature" as the temp outside his snow hovel. Kind of like I can say it was -60 at my house in Barrow Point last winter...I mean outside.

    7. Re:My prediction.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, mr Jones. Or ca I call you Indiana?

    8. Re:My prediction.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, mr Jones. Or can I call you Indiana?

    9. Re:My prediction.... by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had to use HPUX in front of a client (research sponser) on a locked-down PA-RISC machine to fix bugs on-site. That was scary enough for me. ;-)

      -Paul Komarek

    10. Re:My prediction.... by xmedar · · Score: 2

      Well if they followed the Bristish example it would be eggs

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    11. Re:My prediction.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look! Its Biff Ripple - Scientist of Danger!

    12. Re:My prediction.... by uberdave · · Score: 1


      You call him Doctor Jones!
      </voice>

    13. Re:My prediction.... by Grab · · Score: 2

      Excuse me?! These *are* British scientists (with the occasional exception). This is a BBC show.

      The same country that made Robot Wars, Junkyard Wars (aka Scrapheap Challenge), and the Secret Life of Machines series. And of course, the late Great Egg Race - that ruled when I was a kid. Tim Hunkin and Heinz Wolff are gods...

      Grab.

  2. Uh oh by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 5, Funny
    "five scientists are challenged to put their collective scientific knowledge to practical use."

    "scientists"?

    "practical use"!?

    They're doomed.

    --
    But then again, I could be wrong.
    1. Re:Uh oh by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      "In theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is."

      Actually, I've seen several episodes, and they seemed to succeed more than you would expect; it's not a bad program IMO.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:Uh oh by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1
      "In theory there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is."
      That's one of my favorite quotes. At one point, i used it as my .sig . I hope you don't object if I decide to do so again... ;-)
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    3. Re:Uh oh by dublin · · Score: 2

      Sounds to me like what they really need is a tam of engineers facing off against a team of scientists. The scientists will have elegant theories that are totally impractical, and they will die. The engineers will build crap just good enough to get the job done, in true junk yard wars fashion, and win handily.

      That's assuming the engineers are from a real school, instead of some prissy place like MIT or Stanford, where real engineers are harder to find than supermodels that have read Calvin's Institutes. (Now there's a perfect woman! :-)

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  3. A similar show in the UK... by Chembryl · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... first aired a couple of years ago. It was a great idea and made for some good viewing. Can't remember which station it was on though :o( Highlights for me included the making of photographic equipment and a compass.

    --
    - This and all my posts are public domain. I am a Physicist. I am not your Physicist. This is not Physically advice
    1. Re:A similar show in the UK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MacGyver perhaps?

    2. Re:A similar show in the UK... by chrisseaton · · Score: 1

      This was on the BBC, produced for the Open University.

      I remember it being very good, but because it was for the OU, it was shown at about 1:00 AM so only insomniacs could watch it.

      Check the show's site

    3. Re:A similar show in the UK... by vpreHoose · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was on the BBC and had two series.
      http://www.open2.net/science/roughscience/

    4. Re:A similar show in the UK... by Chembryl · · Score: 1

      I expect the people at OU are smiling at all the license money thye got from the deal.

      --
      - This and all my posts are public domain. I am a Physicist. I am not your Physicist. This is not Physically advice
    5. Re:A similar show in the UK... by Hast · · Score: 2

      It's the same program. It's been aired here in Sweden as well, a year or two ago.

      The show is pretty good, I only caught one ep of it though. (Number 8 or so, they build a power grid and a pharmacy.)

      Although I never got around to see more eps it's one of the better shows I've watched lately. A hell of a lot better than Survivor and that tripe.

    6. Re:A similar show in the UK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember it too. The most remembarable project for me was when someone created a radio receiver from a crystal of something and som kithen stuff. It was impressing to see that it worked!

  4. Frontier House in the Desers? by levik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This reminds me of the show they had last year called "Frontier House", where a family was put onto a 19th century homestead to see how they'd do. On hone hand that show proved very interesting, but on the other, the way it was made kind of emphasized scandal, and played down achievements of the more successfull family. I hope this doesn't happen with the new show, since PBS seems to be venturing into traditional network TV territory with these reality series, and I hope they don't sink to trash TV level while doing it.

    --
    Ñ'
    1. Re:Frontier House in the Desers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem with "Frontier House" was that the people involved were happily settled in their lives beforehand.

      The real Frontier Households were immigrants who had left everything to try and make anew life in the US. By moving out to the frontier they could actually have a decent life, free from the tyranny and oppresion they had ben used to.
      To do that programme more realisticaly the producers should have casted from the likes of Sangatte and the other refugee detention centers around Europe. That way you have people of the same frame of mind and position.
      (only joking)

      This Rough Science is not a competition, it's just a light entertainment challenge programme.

    2. Re:Frontier House in the Desers? by tylerdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think the point of Frontier House was to depict frontier life as it was. It seemed to me the point of the show was to make us think about all of the modern comforts and conveniences that we take for granted.

    3. Re:Frontier House in the Desers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was looking forward to this show, hoping it would be an accurate portayal of frontier living. Unfortunately it turned out to be a very inaccurate depiction. They were not allowed to kill animals to eat and were not even allowed to keep a gun for hunting and scaring off animals. It seems they were going for more of a soap-opera effect.

  5. Too bad... by Radish03 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Too bad Mary Ann won't be in it.

    1. Re:Too bad... by dagnabit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another Ginger vs. MaryAnn debate? I say - what's wrong with Mrs. Howell? Sure, the other two are cute. But Mrs. Howell has experience, and she's rich! :)

  6. Don't get your hopes up. by sane? · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is a prog that was on the BBC a year or two ago. Its nothing like either Junkyard (nee Scrapheap) Wars or Survivor, just some marketing creep looking for an angle. There is certainly no real roughing it - think your science teacher trying to make lessons more interesting.

    That said, its still worth catching if you've nothing else to do.

    1. Re:Don't get your hopes up. by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I liked the show, though it's neither Survivor not Junkyard Wars.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    2. Re:Don't get your hopes up. by pubjames · · Score: 2

      But do you remember The Great Egg Race? That was on many many years ago. It was this type of show, and was great. Details here.

    3. Re:Don't get your hopes up. by xA40D · · Score: 2

      And do you remember "Now Get Out of That" ?

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    4. Re:Don't get your hopes up. by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Just call it Mr. Wizard goes to Hawaii.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:Don't get your hopes up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. It was even on Discovery channel here in Canada last year but wasn't all that exciting.

    6. Re:Don't get your hopes up. by xmedar · · Score: 2

      A bit too practical for my tastes I prefer The Adventure Game I mean if I hadnt seen a shy Aspidistra rule an entire planet I might not have become the man I am today...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    7. Re:Don't get your hopes up. by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      As soon as I read the Slashdot heading, I said aloud : "cool". If it is as good as it sounds, it will be cool. But often tv shows and movies are hyped up far beyond what they've actually achieved.

  7. Do they get to use textbooks? by octalc0de · · Score: 1

    I mean, everyone forgets stuff! :)

  8. Vote for me for island leader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am the one who got rid of the fat guy.
    Remember him? How annoying he was? How much food he ate? I'm the one who got rid of him.
    You might not remember the fat guy. Do you know why? Because of me.

  9. "Put their scientific knowledge to practical use" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this the mandate of an engineer, not a scientist?

    How about calling the show "Rough Engineering"?

  10. se a clear subject that describes what your messag by SeorMankypants · · Score: 0

    OT VI Each of the following processes are run to a (1) Floating needle (2) Major cognition (3) Regained ability. (Preferably all three together as the ideal end. End Phenomena.) Be three feet in back of your head. Whatever you are looking at, copy it a dozen times, put it into you. Find the two back corners of the room and hold onto them without thinking for two minutes. Find two corners of the planet Earth, hold onto them for two minutes. Find a place where you are not. Spot three spots in your body. Spot three spots in the room. Be in the following places: The room, the sky, the moon, the sun. Locate an animal .. postulate him moving from one spot to another. Observe him doing this. (0110) Find a walking man ... postulate his walking faster. Do this with 20 people. Find a walking person .. postulate that he will stop, then continue walking. Do this 20 times. Find a person in a distant land. Notice the time of day. Notice the terrain. Notice the general environment. Smell the air. Locate a thought that is his. Locate a thought that is yours. Continue until flat. Notice differences between you and your body. Create in your body a feeling of calmness; create in your body sexual desire and turn it off. Continue that step until you feel you have control over the sexual drives. Create in the body a feeling of pain. Create in the body a feeling of serenity. Do the above until flat. Create in the body a feeling of hunger and turn it off. Continue this step until you are in control of hunger drives. The end result of these particular drills is the regained ability to control the body and its sensations. Now: Postulate anger, boredom, grief, cheerfulness and serenity - in that order. This is continued until you are sure that you can create any emotion. (0111) Finally, exteriorized visit a friend who lives in another state. Greet him and flow affinity to him. Ask him to communicate to you by letter. End of OT VI

    --
    ------------- El nino made me kick my neighbours dog
  11. Rudimentary tool kit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judging by the web site, it looks like their "rudimentary tool kit" include things like strands of wire and 12 V car batteries (unless they found these growing on a tree...).

  12. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only PBS would license The Adventure Game or Now Get Out of That

  13. seen it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was on the BBC here in the UK ages ago.. It's nothing like either of the others, can be boring and silly in places.. but - some of it is ok I guess.. I dispute the word 'practical'..

    Al

  14. How about survive and escape? by bbuda · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why not take the 'Gilligan's Island' concept to it's logical conclusion: put the scientists on a remote island, not knowing their location or how much ocean surrounds them, with no supplies, and leave them there (with a camera crew of course). The scientists would have two challenges: survive off rudimentary supplies and the island's natural resources, and eventually escape to the mainland. The first scientific team to find their way to a major city wins. Of course, you could add in interesting challenges along the way such as those in this show or in Survivor, where the scientists could complete some useful task (dye a flag, as mentioned in the episode guide) in return for a tool or supply. THAT I would watch.

    1. Re:How about survive and escape? by OhYeah! · · Score: 5, Funny

      What kind of scientists do you suggest?

      Psychologists - Starve to death, but leave excellent documentation of the experience.

      Organic Chemists - build homemade reactor to convert tree sap into TNT, cause large periodic explosions until they are rescued.

      Nuclear Physicists - Would cause even bigger explosions, but lack the proper infrastructure.

      Theoretical physicists - dismiss building a raft as trivial.

      Software Engineers - Useless without coffee. In fact, useless altogether on desert island.

      Evolutionary Biologists - Decide to stay and watch the ants.

    2. Re:How about survive and escape? by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Of course, you could add in interesting challenges along the way such as those in this show or in Survivor, where the scientists could complete some useful task (dye a flag, as mentioned in the episode guide) in return for a tool or supply. THAT I would watch.
      That's when I'd promptly change the channel and watch instead a mind-numbing sitcom. Atleast they're more honest than "Reality Television" about what they are.

      The idea of a realistic situation like the above is to remove external intervention from the picture altogether. If you're actually stranded on a desert island, you don't get the opportunity to win a hammer - you have to strap a rock to a stick. You're not able to win an 8" sheath knife, you have to scratch a rock into a jagged and/or sharp edge.

      I can't recall whom, or on what channel it was featured (I believe it was Discovery) a scientist (outdoor survivalist was, I believe, his actual trade) stranded himself in the bush - dropped his snowmobile (intentionally!) through thin ice out in the wild - miles from any civilization, and with only the most basic set of gear (the things a snowmobiler would typically carry with them, no fancy survival kits) and, of course, a camera (which, I believe, was dropped in advance, I forget how it was situated).

      He started out his adventure soaked to the skin, cold, and without food (except for some energy bars he'd brought with him for the trip. Five of them, I believe. "Trail Snacks"). Being early afternoon, he had only a short time to locate a suitable area, build a shelter, start a fire, dry himself off, and find a source of food in the process (being cold and wet come nightfall with two feet of snow on the ground and more coming is a very bad thing<tm>).

      He set up complicated camera shots by himself, for example; camera atop a mountain, run down mountain, walk across a field in camera's view, run back up mountain, stop camera (this brought an amusing anecdote where he set up the camera, ran down the mountain, looked up to see the camera tilting forward, forward, forward... thud!)

      He used, and tested several survival techniques that he teaches in an outdoor survival course, for example setting up four smoke-signal fires on the extremeties of a cross which he walked into the snow in a large open area. At the end, he determined that it was too much hassle to run back and forth between each of them to light and maintain all the fires. He decided instead to go with a walked-in cross (or X, depending on how you look at it) with pillars at each corner and a single (large) signal fire at one extremity.

      All in all, he was in the bush for a little over a week and managed to make himself a cozy living arrangement, including various meat and fish meals at dinner time. Some nights, of course, his fishing instrument didn't work so he didn't eat anything but berries.

      To make a long story even longer {smile} - that is what reality television, IMHO, should be. No challenges, no assistance, no winning tools or champagne, no medical crew standing by to assist as soon as the going gets tough - just (an) individual(s) and (his/their) smarts to get through the situation. Camera crew optional.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    3. Re:How about survive and escape? by malarkey · · Score: 1

      Then, one week a space capsule could land, next week Wrong-way Feldman. Send some cannibals their way another week. All they have to do is hope and pray for a hurricane to get them home.

    4. Re:How about survive and escape? by theCoder · · Score: 1

      There was a show similar to that on NBC about a year ago called Lost. They took teams of people somewhere in the world, gave them a couple hundred bucks and a camera guy. Whichever team made it back to the Statue of Liberty first won. IIRC, this show aired slightly before 9/11 and had made the unfortunate decision to start the teams off in Afganistan. For some reason, I never saw another episode after the first one (that fact that the people were idiots probably didn't help either).

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    5. Re:How about survive and escape? by cornjones · · Score: 1

      i would also watch that show. One problem, though, is that people tend to die on these things. Most people (probably me included) are ill equiped to survive in the wild. I am of a mind that if they sign up and know the risks it is fine if they die. I don't think the media is of such a mind.

    6. Re:How about survive and escape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw that show too. It was on discovery. I felt so bad for the guy when the day that he was supposed to be picked up there were white out conditions and he had to stay for an extra day or two. He sounded pretty sad when he was talking to the camera that day.

    7. Re:How about survive and escape? by merlin_jim · · Score: 2

      Would this guys name perchance be Andrew Loeb?

      Sorry, rereading the cryptonomicon now...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  15. I'm not sure what frightens me more by Christianfreak · · Score: 2

    The fact that PBS is sinking to the level of regular TV and airing 'Yet-Another-Reality-Series' or that it will probably work.

    Are the scientists going to get voted off? Will they make alliances with each other and scheme to get the other scientists? Will they have to cook rats over their Bunson Burners?

    Questions, questions.

    1. Re:I'm not sure what frightens me more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have actually been some decent "reality" series (I'd argue that Survivor is anything but a "reality" show) - Castaway, 1900 House, Frontier House, and Junk Yard Wars (ok, JYW might not really count as "reality" either). Castaway is a series the BBC did a couple of years ago and it's what IMHO Survivor really should have been. The BBC selected ~30 people (?) and dropped them on an island in the Scottish Shetlands. There were a couple of shelters built but not completed, livestock, and gardening equipment. They had to complete their shelters, renovate a surviving structure on the island to use as a schoolhouse, grow most of their own food, generate their own power, and get along with each other for 1 year. Cooperation was the goal. It was infinitely more interesting than Survivor - instead of some stupid glossy looking emotional cripples there were real people who'd volunteered to do this because it sounded cool.

      1900 House and Frontier House were basically the same. Take a family (or group thereof) and put them in a situation that's totally removed from their "normal" life and see how they adapt. The prize for winning is surviving the full course of the show. :)

      Basically - there's some hope for this show.

  16. The Professor by SuperJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Look guys! I made this helicopter entirely out of bamboo and coconuts!"

    (I don't understand why Gilligan's Island went so long, I mean the Professor came up with these brilliant inventions every episode. Why couldn't they just make a raft and have the Prof build a small nuclear reactor to power it?)

    --

    Sheepdot: Open Source good, Closed Source baaaaaaad!

    1. Re:The Professor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you were stuck on an island with Mary Ann, and were smart enough to invent a way off, you'd obviously also be smart enough not to do so.

    2. Re:The Professor by JohnG · · Score: 3, Funny

      Would you REALLY want gillgan near a homemade nuclear reactor?

    3. Re:The Professor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent was marked as insightful? So you guys HADN'T thought of this before? OK here's another one:

      It doesn't make sense that Ginger had 1000s of different outfits if she was only going on a 3 hour tour.

      Mark me up baby!

    4. Re:The Professor by ViMaster · · Score: 1

      This is the first VeggieTales quote I have ever seen on Slashdot.

    5. Re:The Professor by Alsee · · Score: 2

      It doesn't make sense that Ginger had 1000s of different outfits if she was only going on a 3 hour tour.

      Of course it did, that was perfectly in-character. She never ran out of make-up either.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    6. Re:The Professor by Samrobb · · Score: 1

      Veggie Tales quote :-)

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    7. Re:The Professor by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      It doesn't make sense that Ginger had 1000s of different outfits if she was only going on a 3 hour tour.

      I see you are not married... There is no connection to outfits vs time. None that I've discoverd anyhow.

    8. Re:The Professor by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      Yeah Veggies!! ;-)

    9. Re:The Professor by SuperJ · · Score: 2

      Yup, VeggieTales rock. VeggieTales quotes probably aren't seen on Slashdot because there's a low percentage of Christians here (not to mention that to have seen VeggieTales, you have to either be a Christian and somewhat young, or a Christian with young kids), and usually showing signs that you're one gets you modded down. Unless you're Larry Wall. He rocks too. :-)

      --

      Sheepdot: Open Source good, Closed Source baaaaaaad!

  17. If its full of product placement.... by Psx29 · · Score: 1

    a la survivor, screw it. Otherwise I might give it a sporting chance.

    1. Re:If its full of product placement.... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      It was made by the BBC - we don't even have commercial breaks. It will be a cold day in Hell when the BBC sinks to the depths of commercials and product placement.

  18. Just like college.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    7 scientists
    3 male - bio, phy, chem
    4 female - bio, bio, bot, phy

    You think they could have picked a few more women to represent the harder sciences. Everyone complains that not many women go into the sciences and those that do often wind up in a biology type of field (3/4 here).

    Being an engineering major, out of a 60 person class there are maybe 5 girls. I once took a microbiology class for the easy A and out of the 60 person class I was one of 5 guys.

    It's numbers like these that a college needs to advertise. My odds of getting laid in Micro are a lot higher than in any engineering course.

    1. Re:Just like college.... by oh2 · · Score: 1

      Define hard science ; The enigma of life on earth isnt exactly easy to comprehend. Compare that to grasping why a rock hits the ground when dropped. Which is the Harder thing to wrap your mind around ? Hard science has to be defined as any science where the subject matter is hard to reduce to equations and logic. I mean logics easy. Any pocket calculator can deal with logic. As usual you engineer types are full of yourselves.

      --

      Now the world has gone to bed, Darkness won't engulf my head, I can see by infra-red, How I hate the night.

    2. Re:Just like college.... by k98sven · · Score: 1

      Lighten up. The concept "hard science" is usually used for the natural sciences as opposed to "softer" social sciences.

      So, it's not 'hard' as in difficult, but hard as in tangible, matter-related sciences, as opposed to the human-related social sciences.

      We might be arrogant, but we're not THAT arrogant.

    3. Re:Just like college.... by BelDion · · Score: 1

      I knew there was a reason I went into biochemistry. Nothing like going to class and being outnumbered 2:1 by women.

      Well that.. and the fact that I hate engineers. But mainly the women thing ;)

      Oh, and there really isn't anything less hard-science about biology AC; if anything you're applying math and chemistry on top of all the extra stuff you have to learn in the bio field. If you think it isn't hard science, you've never studied it.

      --

      I am BelDion's .Sig; Who the hell is Jack?
    4. Re:Just like college.... by ThePlague · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There are only two sciences: Physics and stamp collecting.

    5. Re:Just like college.... by oh2 · · Score: 1

      Well, i just like to bitch about stuff. Dont you ?

      --

      Now the world has gone to bed, Darkness won't engulf my head, I can see by infra-red, How I hate the night.

    6. Re:Just like college.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's numbers like these that a college needs
      > to advertise. My odds of getting laid in Micro
      > are a lot higher than in any engineering course.


      Yeah, but think of the microbes they're harboring.

      - a.c.

  19. reality nitpick by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    there's nothing realistic about yanking scientists/engineers out of their normal habitats, putting them on an island somewhere, and having them build stuff.

    Please, almost as realistic as the real world, or survivor. Reality tv? That would be too boring. Call it what it is:

    What would happen TV TM

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  20. Junkyard wars? by MrEd · · Score: 3, Funny
    I hope this show isn't as realistic as junkyard wars -


    "Gee whiz, profesor, it's a good thing this moderately sized aircraft crashed in this remote location with key components intact! Now we can build our submarine!"

    --

    Wah!

  21. What a Godless show! by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 1, Funny

    Kate Humble may be a hottie, but there is a much better reality show coming your way: Bible Fear Factor

    1. The First Challenge: Collect 200 Foreskins (1 Samuel 18:27)

    Each Bible Fear Factor contestant will have 8 hours to collect two hundred foreskins with nothing more than a toenail clipper, a roll of paper towels, a Mason Jar, and 3 bus tokens....

    "Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king's son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife." (1Samuel 18:27)

  22. Rumor from NBC by nugneant · · Score: 0

    I hear that NBC is hopping mad over this blatant attempt by public television to cut off a slice of the network pie. So they're going to have a show next season that's exactly the same, only each scientist has a pet monkey with him, and each pet monkey has a typewriter.

    The scientist CAN use the pet monkey in his experiments, either as a test subject or just for parts and labor, but can also gain bonus points (which can be traded for tools, water, Cheetos, etc) if the pet monkey is allowed to play at the typewriter long enough to type out Hamlet, Finnegan's Wake, or any short story by Mark Twain or Kurt Vonnegut.

    However, if the monkey accidently produces a copy of any poem by Elizabeth Barring Brown or a Jane Austen novel, the monkey is shot between the eyes and dragged off to be made into soup.

    It's a "fast paced game of cat and mouse!", according to the network insiders!

    1. Re:Rumor from NBC by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      I thought NBC was using all its monkeys to come up with ideas for new reality shows and new sketches for SNL?

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  23. Of Course . . . by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Will they make alliances with each other and scheme to get the other scientists?"

    They're academics, aren't they?

    Steve

  24. Ginger! by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Ginger! Not Mary Ann!

    1. Re:Ginger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ginger! Not Mary Ann!


      Why not argue vi vs. emacs, while you're at it? By the way, people who prefer Ginger to Mary Ann are insane.

    2. Re:Ginger! by dagnabit · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. The correct answer to this age-old debate is: Ginger and MaryAnn! :)

  25. The fools! by sam_handelman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dr. X: They mocked my research! But I'll show them, I'll show them all!

    Announcer: Fascinating. What scientific principle have you applied?

    Dr. X: Leverage.

    Announcer: I see, and how are you going to use your invention... what's it called?

    Dr. X: A big stick.

    Annonucer: Yes, your stick. Dr. Sullivan has succeeded in making charcoal a furnace. How does your invention compare to that?

    Dr. X: I will use it to leverage his cranium.

    Announcer: That science-speak is too much for me.

    Dr. X: Let me demonstrate. [Smashes announcer's head in.]

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  26. coolness! by gimpimp · · Score: 1

    we've had this in the uk since last year (i think). it's really good for nerdy types :)
    one of the shows dumped the scientists in spain (they didn't know that), and they had to pinpoint out their location, iirc.
    some other tasks have been to make ice(withough electrics, refrigerator etc), take a photo(using only natural substances etc.

    enjoy!

    --
    i wish i was but oh well
  27. Well Duh! It's the SAME SHOW!! by DragonC · · Score: 1

    Done by the Open University earlier this year.

  28. If they could... by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. start a fire or catch a fish, then they would have beaten every person that has been Survivor.

    Every season of Survivor is the same with the same cast of idiots starving because all they can find to eat are coconuts that practically fall out of the trees and hit them on the head and maybe some snails that crawled into their sleeping bags.

    Pick up the damn fishing pole and catch some fish!

    1. Re:If they could... by DJNW · · Score: 1
      well, from what I've caught when it's run on the Beeb, they've come up with (amongst others), sunblock, clocks, radio/transmitter, a rudimentary freezer and other nifty stuff.


      I'm pretty sure they'd be okay if they actually did have to rustle up food.

    2. Re:If they could... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      start a fire or catch a fish, then they would have beaten every person that has been Survivor.

      Yeah, no kidding. I watched exactly one episode of Survivor, one where they had to try to make a fire. It was like pulling teeth to see how stupid they were. They finally made a bow and were spinning it and getting a little smoke, but their tinder was laying two feet away... ARGH..

      Anyway, I didn't attempt to watch much more after that.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:If they could... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Well most likely the reason they never did all that? The script. yeah, come on you didn't think Survivor wasn't actually scripted?

    4. Re:If they could... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      poor snails

  29. Sounds interesting by jedie · · Score: 0
    Where I live (.be) the only reality shows we have are "big brother" (third or fourth season now, and completely CRAP) and "expeditie robinson" (I think it's the equivalent of survivor).

    Now most of you people talk about a show called "Junkyard" or something, I've never seen it, but the concept is marvelous. If this "Rough Sience" is what it claims to be and resembles "Junkyard" I personally would watch it. Why?

    Because it actually sounds interesting, educational and hella cool :) I mean come on... what is more interesting? getting assignments like "(rough science) one of your teammates has been isolated, but he has a radio receiver/transmitter with him that works on such and such frequencies. Here are some parts, assemble a radio of your own and rescue him by finding out his location" OR "The ladies have to walk around topless for a week, but the men aren't allowed to drink water (big brother)"



    Another thing: IMO the producers also figured that there is an untapped resource of more intelligent and demanding viewers who don't like watching stuff like "big brother" (because it's stupid and mindless IMO) and they decided to put some effort into attracting these people.



    Another interesting concept would be: a couple of teams who get a programming assignment and they get X hours to complete it. Afterwards (depending on the results) the winning team could choose some form of (computer related?) research which they can fund with the prizemoney.

    And ofcourse the sourcecodes would be made publicly available and at the end of each season people would be able to vote online which of the codes of that season should get the award of "excellent fooness" :)

    Hell.. I'd watch it :D

    --
    "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
    http://slashdot.jp
  30. they wont be able to out-do the professor by jest3r · · Score: 3, Informative

    The professor has a pretty impressive list of scientific / engineering accomplishments - i doubt anyone can top him:

    - a bamboo lie detector (hooked up to the ship's horn and the radio's batteries)
    - a coconut shell battery recharger
    - a bamboo telescope
    - a Geiger counter
    - jet-pack fuel
    - a bamboo xylophone
    - keptibora-berry extract to remedy Gilligan's double vision
    - an assortment of tonics, antiseptics, poisons, "spider cider" (to kill off gargantuan morning spiders)
    - soap made from plant fats
    - shark repellent
    - a pedal-powered bamboo sewing machine
    - lead radiation suits and make-up (protection from a meteor's cosmic rays)
    - a helium balloon (rubber raincoats sewn together and sealed with tree sap)
    - a strychnine serum that temporarily paralyzes Gilligan
    - an electrode linked to to a pedal-powered generator
    - pedal powered washing machine
    - pedal powered water pump
    - pedal powered telegraph
    - Mr. Howell's roulette wheel and pool table

    1. Re:they wont be able to out-do the professor by Spunk · · Score: 1

      keptibora-berry extract to remedy Gilligan's double vision

      After Gilligan foiled every clever escape plan he made, he should have had the foresight to secretly create a poison instead. Six getting off the island is better than none.

  31. PBS created reality TV in 1973 by Lovejoy · · Score: 1

    PBS created the first reality show "An American Family" in 1973.

    They aren't following anyone. You should also see "Frontier House," another PBS reality show. Nothing like the network stuff.

  32. Seen it! by oh2 · · Score: 1

    Swedish television aired the series this spring. It was really fun to watch. In one episode they distilled etherical oils from plants for pharmaceutical purposes. They built the still from scratch using scrap. In the same episode they also built a wind turbine without proper tools and of course the generator to go with it. Survivors swedish version "Expedition Robinson" has nothing on this show. These people actually compete for fun, not to become class three celebrities. (famous for a short while due to bad behavior in public) See it ! Its really good! And yes, I like exclamationpoints!

    --

    Now the world has gone to bed, Darkness won't engulf my head, I can see by infra-red, How I hate the night.

  33. Meaning of 'rough' by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    We're all familiar with describing someone as a 'smoothie'. A person with a certain amount of charm, or who at least thinks he has charisma. A related term is 'smooth operator'. Such people might typically be working in marketing or public relations, or perhaps as politicians or a certain type of PHB.

    It doesn't take much thought to realize that the word 'smooth' comes from an association with being clean-shaven. After all, it is applied only to men. If you want more evidence, how about the epithet 'smoothychops'.

    Now consider a theoretician or a Real Programmer. Surely the first image that comes to mind is the possibly-overweight and heavily bearded man in loosely-fitting clothes. In a typical technology company, these people are at the opposite end from the marketroids; but despite their strong technical knowledge they may not always be able to apply it practically (to the end of making money, at least).

    So we have at one end the clean-shaven, 'smooth' but superficial and essentially useless marketing half of a technology company. At the other, the -bearded but also somewhat unrealistic technical side. But in the programme 'Rough Science', competitors are expected to have theoretical knowledge and also to apply it successfully. The title refers to the several days' stubbly beard growth a typical male scientist will get after a few days stranded on the island. This 'rough', newly-grown beard is a blend of the two facial hair types.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  34. TLC's Escape from Experiment Island by jimmcq · · Score: 2

    Sounds like TLC's Junkyard War's spinoff Escape from Experiment Island.

  35. Re:Stephen King, author, dead at 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hehehehe
    and ontopic, yeah baby!

  36. Put the War in Junkyard Wars by ScottBob · · Score: 2

    I've always wanted to see a futuristic version of Survivor where they're placed in a postapocalyptic environment (think Mad Max, Waterworld, etc.) where they have to build the same sort of contraptions as Junkyard Wars, all the while battling for food and clean water, fending off pirates and thieves, and whoever doesn't make it off the island or outside the perimeter before their machines break down loses.

  37. Is it just me... by Kjella · · Score: 2

    ...or does this sound like reality-MacGyver? Oh yes with this shoestring, hydrosulfid and my pocket knife(tm) I can solve this problem in a pseudoscientific way. Good luck, but I think I'll stick to the notsoreal version, at least there things "work".

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  38. What's with Slashdot here by hacksoncode · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Geez, folks, come on... so it's a bit stupid. So what. Give them credit at least for trying to expose the unwashed masses to something remotely resembling scientific thought.


    What did you expect? Nova? Talk about preaching to the choir.

  39. Where do they teach this stuff? by Subcarrier · · Score: 3, Funny

    As part of my work I have:

    Slept in a snowbank (ambient temp -30C)


    Advanced course on thermodynamics.

    Scaled ice covered rock faces with 30 kilos of equipment

    Laboratory assignment on mechanics for post-graduate students.

    Faced bears and wolves unarmed.

    Armed with Occam's razor -- survival course for graduate students.

    Hiked alone in the Amazon rain forest.

    General relativity theory, and how amazons manage to procreate anyway.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    1. Re:Where do they teach this stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny stuff...where are mod points when you need them? Mod parent up!

  40. Soap by Scrameustache · · Score: 2

    Anybody else find it disturbing that the task of making soap only comes in at the last show?
    Stinky scientists...

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Soap by phorm · · Score: 2

      You don't really need soap to be clean. I good thing of running water, mini waterfall, etc and a decent scrubbing will get you cleaner than if you just quickly latered some soap and splashed around a bit.

      Previous articles mention soap killing both good and bad bacteria, and often enough, helping make more disinfectant-resistant bacteria.

      However, one wonders at their solution to toilet paper? Weeds would be itchy and long grass might leave one with a green posterior?
      Our next project is... self-manufactured preparation H - phorm

  41. Wonder if they read Usenet by Cheshyre · · Score: 1

    A year ago, in post http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=9q8np4$7t7@ne taxs.com , someone asked

    "Meanwhile, does anyone think that Survivor could be improved by combining it with Junkyard Wars?"

  42. Too bad no Economists by GMontag · · Score: 2

    Would be great if it were a Scientist, Engineer and Economist.

    With the economist running around with crackpot assumptions that have nothing to do with reality and the Engineer to save them all!*

    *adapted from an old joke

  43. Re:se a clear subject that describes what your mes by baudtender · · Score: 1

    No no... he said _scientists_.

    Not _Scientologists_.

  44. What the heck? by baudtender · · Score: 1

    I looked over the episode guide and there is
    clearly no reference to when the Harlem
    Globetrotters arrive.

    What gives?

  45. Real surviving by rjamestaylor · · Score: 5, Interesting
    No kidding. Did you see the real-life survivor story this week about the Long Beach, CA man sailing his small sailboat to Catalina Island (truly a "three hour tour") but a storm rose and rendered his ship uncontrollable? He drifted for 3 1/2 months living on sea turtles, birds and fish until a San Diego-based warship found him near the coast of Costa Rica. He was healthy, though thinner, and even knew where he was and what the date was. Oh, did I mention he's 62 years old?

    Sure, he's a moron for not filing a cruise plan (er, the boating equivalent of a flight plan...whatever it's called) with the Coast Guard (but then, who really wants to voluntarily tell the gov't their every move?), or telling friends where he was going and when he'd be back...but he was a true survivor.

    And,. although he was very happy to see the US warship, he wasn't looking for a free ride home: he asked them to repair his mast and he would sail home on his own. That's freakin' impressive.

    • (I may have munged some of te details of the story, but that's why I linked to news.google.com, an awsome resource, for you to follow and be cleansed of my gross inaccuracies.)
    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  46. academic credentials are vague by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder why the biographies vaguely mention degrees without being specific.

  47. Danny Dunn!!! by LuxFX · · Score: 1

    Does this make anyone else think of one of the books from the old Danny Dunn series, where the trouble-bound kid is nephew of a brilliant scientist? I loved these books when I was a kid! The one titled Danny Dunn on a Desert Island tells of Danny, his best friend, his uncle, and one of his uncle's peers, getting caught on a desert island.

    They turned being stranded into a competition and distributed points for whoever made the most useful inventions, such as a hot-water bath and homemade soap.

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    1. Re:Danny Dunn!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to read those books. I had a huge crush on Irene. (I think that was her name)

    2. Re:Danny Dunn!!! by LuxFX · · Score: 1

      heh -- me too!

      they were good books for the science-minded youth. Of course a lot of it was unrealistic, but I think (at least this was the impression I remember having) it was all rather well founded. Sort of a good step for kids on their way to reading the more-believably written sci-fi books.

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  48. don't see Rough Science in television listings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone found it? When will it be aired in your area?

  49. Other show ideas by hitchhacker · · Score: 2


    Why scientists? We should be sending politicians, lawyers, CEO's, and telephone sanitisers to these islands. I bet they would accomplish a whole lot more than scientists would...

    <CEO> ever since we adopted leaves as legal tender we've all become immensely rich.

    I would think that a team of engineers would be more interesting than scientists. Who knows.

    metric

    1. Re:Other show ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engineers would definently do better than scientists. We have to study a broad spectrum of everything including sociology, law, businnes, sciences, maths, computer science.

  50. Obligatory Slashdot whine: by Abreu · · Score: 2

    "This is not news!!"

    --
    No sig for the moment.
    1. Re:Obligatory Slashdot whine: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News: New information of any kind (according to http://www.dictionary.com)

    2. Re:Obligatory Slashdot whine: by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Joke: Something said or done to evoke laughter or amusement (according to http://www.dictionary.com)

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  51. As seen on BBC by spray_john · · Score: 1

    The sales pitch sounds nice, but the programme's pretty boring. They don't actually sleep on the island or anything, they just try to do neat little examples, like making shampoo out of seaweed or building a music instrument.

  52. Re: Mrs Howell by Abreu · · Score: 2

    You have done poolboy work, havent you?

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  53. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly the physicists and botanists will be the most valuable people to have - Physicists seem to generally have the most broad based practical knowledge of how things work, as compared to say engineers, chemists, etc.

    Botanists certainly will have a more specialized knowledge, but I think their knowledge of the composition of indigenous plants would be crucial.

    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps there is a use for botanists after all. :P

    2. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure enough! At the very least if I were stranded I'd want to know what was safe to eat. I suppose you could test things by slowly ingesting very small quantities and seeing what effect they had, but that would suck (and would take time, which you might not have if you had no safe food whatsoever)

  54. Survivor meets Reality by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 1

    Trapped somewhere with nothing but nature -- and a TV crew?

    Within a day, there would be a broadcast showing the crew tied up in the background with the 'subject' announcing to the network that they have 24 hours to get them out of here.

  55. Old joke by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

    A physicist, a chemist and an economist are stranded on an island, with nothing to eat. A can of soup washes ashore. The physicist says, "Lets smash the can open with a rock." The chemist says, "Lets build a fire and heat the can first." The economist says, "Lets assume that we have a can-opener..." Paul Samuelson

  56. What about the Howells? by egg+troll · · Score: 1
    It doesn't make sense that Ginger had 1000s of different outfits if she was only going on a 3 hour tour.


    And why were the Howells, a couple rich enough to buy the Eastern seabord, sharing a crummy little boat to begin with?

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
  57. Does the tool kit include a graphing calculator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The list of necessary tools:
    -hair gel to keep from looking like einstein
    -a fancy dancy supercomputer in a calculator.
    -someone who is actually strong,capable in the woods
    -their favorite books on different algerian ant-eaters to put them to sleep
    -a phase inverter
    -a hydrogen fuel cell
    -some liquid NI3 to pour on the portable toilet seats of the producers. That would be funny!
    -A buntzen burner as a source of fire

  58. This is not news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to let you guys know, this show has been on the BBC for at least 2 years...possibly more.

    Its quite interesting to see how things can be done with everyday stuff (on one episode they made a radioreceiver and transmitter out of junk, for example).

    I think its aimed more at the younger viewers - say 7-12 years - dunno about Americans, but I'm told your education system sucks so some of you uni students might be watching it!

  59. Wait a minute.. by Werelock · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is /. for crying out loud - where's the open source angle?! Are the scientists going to build a cocunut PC running FreeBSD or something??

  60. My favorite Episode was when Kirk... by shoppa · · Score: 5, Funny
    My favorite episode of this series was when Kirk, forced to battle the oversized Gorn, created a crude cannon out of various native materials.

    I repeatedly uttered "fascinating" while watching this episode from the viewscreen on the bridge.

  61. He's a crap sailor... by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

    I did read about this. He spent alot more time seeing how much he could eat than getting his ass back to land. Catalina Island is only 25 miles out and he drifted 2500 miles to Costa Rica without getting back to land. If your going to blue water sail, you have to learn how to survive dismasting and by survive I don't mean drifting into the southern ocean.

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
    1. Re:He's a crap sailor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      big words from a land-locked little man.

    2. Re:He's a crap sailor... by rjamestaylor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm in Southern California and have read and heard a lot of comments from seasoned sailors regarding Van Pham's plight. Nothing I've heard criticized him for failing to control his vessel--only failing to coordinate with others his sailing plans. Yes, these sailors may just be deciding to politely avoid embarrassing the gentleman for spending "alot more time seeing how much he could eat than getting his ass back to land," but it is more likely that you're just being hypercritical. Or, perhaps, you have special insight into sailing with damaged vessels... In any regard, you come off a tad bit insulting and arrogant.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    3. Re:He's a crap sailor... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* He spent alot more time seeing how much he could eat than getting his ass back to land. *)

      Not a whole you can do anyhow if you lost your sales, no?

      Might as well munch. Did he cook them? Raw fish sounds icky, but I guess if you are starving then it would fill the spot.

    4. Re:He's a crap sailor... by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes he cooked them - on a stove by burning bits of his boat. When the Navy found him they had to scuttle the boat because it was too damaged to tow.

      Frankly, I'd love to know what the previous poster would do in the guy's situation - you're on a sailboat with no mast, no motor, and a dead radio. There are no ships in your vicinity for 3.5 months (yes, this is easily possible). Are you going to row back to shore? I don't think so.

      For the record - one other ship did pass within visual range, but he was unsuccessful in signaling them. The Navy ship was only the second one he saw.

    5. Re:He's a crap sailor... by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      you're on a sailboat with no mast, no motor, and a dead radio. There are no ships in your vicinity for 3.5 months (yes, this is easily possible). Are you going to row back to shore? I don't think so.

      No mast, no motor, no radio?

      Break out the emerency navigation supplies (IIRC everyone's still required to carry traditional navigation supplies) and see about rowing back to shore. If there's still sail material, rig a sail using whatever wood and lashing material can be found. Try and get the radio working with the fifteen minutes of spare time per day.

      As for burning the boat... I'd try the ol' sunight and a mirror trick first. Then again, that might not be practical...

    6. Re:He's a crap sailor... by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      • Break out the emerency navigation supplies (IIRC everyone's still required to carry traditional navigation supplies) and see about rowing back to shore. If there's still sail material, rig a sail using whatever wood and lashing material can be found.
      You should read the Navy's comments in the stories...he did know where he was and what the date was (time is easy, so I assume he knew that). Also, he did have a makeshift mast from what he could scrounge together.

      Unless I'm missing something, it seems a bit unfair to dismiss this man's plight so succinctly as you have done.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    7. Re:He's a crap sailor... by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      You should read the Navy's comments in the stories...he did know where he was and what the date was (time is easy, so I assume he knew that). Also, he did have a makeshift mast from what he could scrounge together.

      Well, cool. :) Then he's definitly not lazy, just unsuccessful.

      Unless I'm missing something, it seems a bit unfair to dismiss this man's plight so succinctly as you have done.

      Of course it is. But this is /., where everything is unfair. ;)

      (Thanks for the correction, btw.)

  62. Kate Humble by dubstop · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, The Great Egg Race wasn't presented by Kate Humble, so Rough Science wins.

  63. The obvious solution to your challenge. by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 2, Funny

    Create weapons and turn on the film crew, using their tents, electrical equipment and food to effect their escape to the mainland.

    --
    All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
  64. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by PowerBook2k · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Martin, draw a plan for a coconut radio, and if possible, a coconut Nintendo system." --Bart, "Das Bus"

  65. Cast is no real surprise by lemley · · Score: 1

    Have not seen the show, but... I just looked at the bios (pun intended) of the mostly biologists that make up the cast. It's no real surprise that they are either rabid environmentalists or mostly biologists. These fashionable scientists make a young and photogenic crew with neat CVs that sound cool to many folks that watch PBS. Surely there are more qualified candidates... since usually engineers solve applied science problems... and engineers usually have backgrounds in physics, which only two of the seven appear to have, and normally physics (and it's application in mechanical engineering) is pretty important in solving the types of problems one would encounter if stranded in the middle of nowhere... you know like building shelter, water transport, and using mechanical advantage whenever possible. Don't get me wrong, I recognize that often mechanical engineers (in particular academics) are not always great at solving practical problems, but come on PBS!!!

    1. Re:Cast is no real surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not a PBS show. They got it off of the BBC. Having watched this show for several years I can tell you that they are not jsut dumped on an island somewhere. It is a hypothetical situation - at the beginning of day 1 the presenter sets the challenge. The scientists have 3 days to do it. Every night they go back to their hotel.

      The challenges aren't "build a shelter" or "make a machine to pick coconuts" or anything. They are more mundane like make a radio or an underwater electric light (with associated wind turbine).

  66. Stranded - Season 2 - "E-arth" by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

    Welcome to Stranded! We've stranded each of our six scientist on a pre-technical planet full of hostile savages that eat organics and use atmospheric pressure oscillations to communicate! The scientists will have to deal with environmental disturbances such as open bodies of liquid dihydrogen monoxide, variable illumination levels, a dangerously oxidizing atmosphere, and omnivorous bio-forms! Each scientist will have to build the tools they need to survive and escape (like subsurface metal miners, autorepair nandroids, vacuum energy converters, and a working D'Drribsky shunt) using only native equipment (like iron-carbon alloy, polymerized pthalates, contaminated silicon aggregates, and osseous material from the bio-forms themselves.) They have only twelve teracycles to escape before we 'help' their sun go nova! The winner will be granted regenerative immortality by the Regulatory Council, and the losers will be vaporised into oblivion! Be sure to watch, won't you?

  67. DuPont Information by Punchinello · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My wife works for DuPont. This is their press release which gives information about where it will be aired:

    Rough Science - DuPont will be the corporate sponsor of the BBC production "Rough Science" in which 5 scientists on a remote island are challenged to solve science problems through their collective wits, scavenged items and the natural resources of their surroundings. The program will air on PBS stations in many of the top markets including LA, NYC, Philadelphia, Houston, Dallas & Washington D.C. Air dates and times vary by market. Major funding for the program is provided by the National Science Foundation. DuPont is the only corporate sponsor and our 15 second messages will appear at the beginning and close of each segment.

    --

    Remember... ZG9uJ3QgZm9yZ2V0IHRvIGRyaW5rIHlvdXIgb3ZhbHRpbmU=

  68. Hook Ups by WickywiK · · Score: 1

    Cool. I can't wait to see who hooks up with who because I'm sure that will be the angle PBS takes on it. I mean, why else would anyone watch a show like this?

  69. First-hand experience.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was on Carriacou whilst they filmed this (which is the second series of an english program). The first series, the last four episodes, was filmed some time ago, whilst the third is being filmed in New Zealand on top of a mountain at the moment. (or has just been filmed.. I'm not sure of the timescale).

    Having had a somewhat unique perspective in watching the scientists film much of the Carriacou series, there was actually quite a lot of interesting stuff going on, and far from being "a science lesson made interesting" as one member has posted, the series actually challenged the scientists a great deal, and I can vouch for the frustration experienced by all with regard to more than one of the challenges.

    Whilst what they do in the programs could be touted as little more than reinventing the wheel in the image of the original prototype, some of the methods which they use to accomplish what they do are truly ingenious, and a lot of hard work went into the program. The science behind the series is (for the most part) good, and - even from the perspective of someone with a good working knowledge of physics and chemistry - the program is very interesting indeed.

    Watch for the musical instruments, some of which I helped design. :)

  70. Hmm... No Engineers.. by Planetes · · Score: 1

    So we have an island full of scientists with no engineers. These are people who spend their lives figuring out how the universe works. Engineers spend their lives fixing/building things after the scientists are done screwing with it. They'll need at least one engineer just to figure out how to put the ideas into practice.

    --
    Planetes
    "One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promo Ad
    "Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitl
  71. scurvy? by teridon · · Score: 2

    He was out there for 3.5 months and he didn't get scurvy?

    --
    I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing. -- Thomas Jefferson
  72. Seen It Already! by Sinesurfer · · Score: 1
    This show was on the BBC World Service late last year (2000) or earlier this year.

    Quite good, on one show they build a record player and found their latitude and longitude. The last one interested me as it's what any castaway would need to find (if all other instruments are lost).

    --
    Regards Sinesurfer A Nerd is someone who lives for technology, A Geek is someone who lives for technology and loves it
  73. Re:Hmm... No Engineers.. but no Marketers by Optical+Voodoo+Man · · Score: 1
    So we have an island full of scientists with no engineers

    Thank God it isn't an island full of marketing people with no engineers. At least scientists know how the world works. Marketers spend their lives figuring out what people want to buy:

    "I just know I could sell people on the idea of a coconut radio to call for help. If I had a computer, I could write you an email with the spec... Wait. Radios are like the internet. Why not make me a computer that's linked to the internet! Out of palm leaves, sea shells, and bamboo. And make it black, black is the hot color for hard drives now. You will be able to match the Pantone number, right?"

  74. Re:se a clear subject that describes what your mes by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

    That would be a good show, though. Strand the top 20 Scientologists on a desert island with no access to lawyers. You could have it sponsored by Google, The Wayback Machine and Xenu.net.

    --
    Click here if you just like to click on shit.
  75. Dude! by floydigus · · Score: 1

    Lesley Judd was a FOX!!!

    --

    All things in moderation; including moderation

  76. not survivor at all by wdebruij · · Score: 1

    I've watched a few episodes that were broadcast at the 'bbc learning zone', nighttime educational programming, and in one of these they talk about disturbing the local island radio with one of their homebuilt devices. As far as I know this island was somewhere in the caribbean, but I forgot the name. I guess they had to drive at most a half an hour before hitting the first cocktail bar after taping an episode. That basically defies the entire survivor idea, right?

  77. Aw, Come *On* Guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't diss it until you've seen it. It's a set of challenges like finding their approximate position on the earth, and creating a photograph of the place and it's a fun, geeky half hour in the sun on an old prison island.

  78. Hmm now where have I seen this before... by /.Rooster · · Score: 1
    The BBC had a very simliar format program back in the early 80's called Now Get Out Of That. It involved pseudo scientists competing against each other to complete a course over 3 days. I hate to say it but I find the whole reality TV genre completly overworked. Isn't there anything original left in US TV anymore? Or maybe there never was? Go here anyways if you want to find out about it.

    JAT

    --
    Rooster - A friend. "Anyone's friend in particular or just generally well disposed to people?"
  79. Make the show more entertaining: by Zarf · · Score: 1

    Send the folks from the "Tonight Show" segment called "Jay Walking"... NOW THAT's entertainment! Remember these are the folks who when asked who the first man in space was answer, "Buzz Lightyear?"

    I say stick these folks on an island and ask them to do something practical like catch fish, or build a shelter, or make a flashlight from scrap materials. Want some real fun? Give 'em a Lobster and tell them to make a hat out of it.

    I wonder what a kind of civilization would be created by these folks if left alone on a planet in sector Zed Zed triple Zed Alpha for about two million years. Oh wait. Already seen it... then boom! Hyperspace by-pass.

    --
    [signature]
  80. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    ... Jesus cried with a loud voice: Lazarus, come forth; the bug hath been
    found and thy program runneth. And he that was dead came forth...
    -- John 11:43-44 [version 2.0?]

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...