Slashdot Mirror


Motion Simulator for Home Theater

Dalvenjah FoxFire writes "D-Box, a Canadian speaker company, has designed a system called the Odyssee consisting of four motor-driven actuators that go under your couch and a controller box with a CD-ROM drive for the control files. The controller reads the Dolby Digital bitstream from your DVD player, and plays back synchronized motion effects designed by the company. For about $20,000, you too can add motion simulation to your home theater. They have a list on their site of the movies they've encoded, including The Matrix, Drunken Master, Star Wars Episode I, and more, though it also has an 'audio driven' mode which will work with any source."

125 comments

  1. Sweeet!!! by CyberBill · · Score: 2, Funny

    This would make porn Soooooo much better!!!!!! -Bill

    --
    -Bill
    1. Re:Sweeet!!! by REDNOROCK · · Score: 0

      You know what would make porn a hell of a lot better? Digital interactive real dolls, with intergrated displays.

      --
      Even if I say something insightfull or inteligent, it doens't matter cause I'm an ass.
    2. Re:Sweeet!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the movies listed is "A Bug's Life". Somehow, I just can't imagine what they did to move the couch to this movie. LOL.

    3. Re:Sweeet!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a USB cyber-pussy?

      Tele-sex anyone?

  2. Watching Buffy... by FyRE666 · · Score: 2

    So if I'm watching buffy, does it make the springs fly out and stab me in the back when she stakes one of the toothy evil dudes?

  3. Amusement Park caliber? by Vietomatic · · Score: 1

    I have been to amusement park motion rides, and they generate the illusion of motion via many techniques: fans, moving seats, surround sound. But I wonder if home modifications can add some water splashes and pain stimulators?

    That would be an awesome movie going experience!

    1. Re:Amusement Park caliber? by seinman · · Score: 1

      Pain stimulators? i'm waiting for pleasure stimulators. Then my porn collection would be SO much more enjoyable.

    2. Re:Amusement Park caliber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you go:

      http://www.vrinnovations.com/index2.htm

      When will we see drivers for this in the Linux Kernel?

  4. Just Imagine... by silverhalide · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait until they encode Debbie Does Dallas, and other high quality pr0n flicks. As usual, pr0n will take this technology to the next level!!

    1. Re:Just Imagine... by quitcherbitchen · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is nothing new. I once went to a hotel where the bed did the exact same thing.

      And it only cost a quarter!

    2. Re:Just Imagine... by kzinti · · Score: 1

      Gee... back in the day, we went to see "Debbie Does Dallas in Sensurround" (tm). Talk about making the Earth move!

      --JIm

  5. Great... another way to spill my tea by jpt.d · · Score: 2

    Ever try drinking tea in a moving car? It is almost similar to easily getting burned. Now enter the couch. If I just happen to be trying to drink some tea the couch MOOOVEESS *spill* GOT DAMN IT!....

    Need I say more?

    --
    What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
    1. Re:Great... another way to spill my tea by chill · · Score: 2

      Tea?

      Forget that! Wait until some the guys come over for NFL Playoffs and get drunk on beer.

      "Hey! What's THIS button do?"

      Puking all OVER the place! SOMEBODY'S wife is going to be PISSED!

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Great... another way to spill my tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the crumpets too. Just imagine all the crumbs having a chance to burrow deeper into your couch.

    3. Re:Great... another way to spill my tea by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

      Now enter the couch

      That sounds like a cool movie.

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    4. Re:Great... another way to spill my tea by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      1. buy one of these thingies for 20k
      2. make some tea.
      3. put matrix on
      4. ???
      5. sue.
      6. profit!!!

      seriously though, drinking hot tea on comfy coach is asking for trouble even without the coach moving.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Great... another way to spill my tea by jpt.d · · Score: 2

      Forget beer, disgusting stuff!

      --
      What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
  6. Ohh the possibilites ... by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 1

    Imagine P0rn in Motion, the beating of the rods,...

    But what happens if somebody hacks this thing? Am I ending with my head sticking in the ceiling?

    --
    ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
    1. Re:Ohh the possibilites ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because, of *course* it's hooked up to the internet. Oh, you mean it *isn't*?

      I mean, geez, is there going to be one of these posts for every new piece of technology? "What if somebody hacks "; SUBJECT$. Yeesh.

  7. potential problem by evacuate_the_bull · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does Odyssee only work with action movies?

    Absolutely not! While there is no question that Odyssee can add dramatic effects to action scenes containing explosions, car chases and aerial dogfights, you'll find the more subtle effects it can create will add even more to your overall viewing experience. Odyssee adds fun, drama and excitement to everything you watch.


    Odyssee will also likely make me spill my beer all over my girlfriend and her $1,000 leather. Yup, that'll add drama and excitement to the night... :)

    --
    Satanists get good grades too...suspiciously good grades
    1. Re:potential problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not your girlfriend. That's not even leather! Hey! Get away from me, you creep!!

  8. So... by blake213 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's basically just a giant Rumble Pack?

    --
    mund freud.
    1. Re:So... by noctrl · · Score: 1

      Why not use a vibrator like the they use in wet concrete, and strap it under the sofa..

  9. Tech TV by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see someone else besides me watches Tech TV, they just had a segment on this in Fresh Gear this morning. You can probably catch it some other time this weekend if you want to see some video of this in action.

    I have to wonder though if a motion device like this wouldn't make a movie less, rather than more, immersive. Even the motion simulator rides at Disney I find too distractng to really enjoy (and in its own category, the Back to the Future ride at Universal that smashes the heads of tall people into the walls over and over again). I get more of a sense of motion from IMAX than from motion simulators.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Tech TV by jpt.d · · Score: 2

      I must agree. I have seen one movie on an IMAX up in Hull, QB once. I loved it. Goto Canada's Wonderland in Toronto - I hate the roller coasters. Of course I tended to get motion sick once in Quake 3 Fortress after not playing for a while. Had to turn off the bobbing :-)

      --
      What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
    2. Re:Tech TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Mod the parent down, it's obviously a lie.

      Fresh Gear only shows MP3 players and digital cameras, except for the big show they do each year where they show digital cameras and MP3 players.

  10. Porn bodysuit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until they invent the full-body virtual masturbation suit (in Minority Report), I'm not interested.

  11. Next on the market... by jpt.d · · Score: 1

    Moving chairs... Click 'make', you switch to your porn movie. An error during the build, the chair shakes. WONDEROUS! U.S. Patent number 6728482! (not really)

    --
    What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
  12. The Drunken Masters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drunken Master? Oh, for shame! They could have at least gone with Drunken Master II.

    The sequel is much the better of the two.

  13. Extrapolation by nullproductions · · Score: 1

    I bet this'll be extra sexy when it's combined with those new 3D screens.

    --
    Rain falls on everyone... lightning strikes some. -Maria Doria Russel
  14. For $20K by volpe · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can hire the neighbor's kid to stand behind the couch and jump up and down on cue, and still have $19,980 left over.

    1. Re:For $20K by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

      I can hire the neighbor's kid to stand behind the couch and jump up and down on cue, and still have $19,980 left over.

      For $20K I could hire someone to rock my world while I hung on to the couch, and still have enough left to smoke myself to death afterwards. ;-)

      --
      "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    2. Re:For $20K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think that's what he was implying. the neighborhood kid boy.

  15. kewl... tho... by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

    thats kewl, tho how many wants to buy a system like that? who actually needs a system like that? and how much it makes noise, if it makes too much noise it will be useless...

    Kewl that you can get to your home theater system something like that also, but price is high and that isn't very needed, i think their market will be a bit narrow, for the rich kids only...

  16. Bass shakers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Haven't we had [url=http://www.vrealities.com/bass.html]bass shakers[/url] for years now? I got a couple for $40 and they work pretty well. Granted all they do is shake things, but I'm pretty sure the Odysee doesn't shake you $20,000 better.

    1. Re:Bass shakers? by adamjaskie · · Score: 2

      Yeah just mount 2-3 of those to the bottom of your couch. It would work just as well, and only end up costing you $19,425 less.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
  17. pentium 5's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone else noticed that in the English HTML part of the site under how it workd says that it is powered by the computational equivelant of a pentium 5! Someone, please tell me has Intel already started selling another chip? I still have my PIII!

    1. Re:pentium 5's? by smart.id · · Score: 1

      It believe it said that it was equal to 5 Pentium processesors, not a Pentium 5. And I'm not sure how good five Pentiums are together, but I'm willing to bet a Pentium 4 is better.

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
  18. Geez... by limbostar · · Score: 1

    My downstairs neighbors are going to just love this device.

    --
    this is a sig.
  19. This is the same old problem by ShooterNeo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This technology has the same old problem TONS of extremely cool failed entertainment techs have had.

    Force feedback, HDTV, 3d displays, head mounted displays, smell devices, and many others. I suspect the first true V.R. rigs (with wires jacking right in to your nervous system) will suffer it too.

    The old chicken and the egg. This tech is not quite good enough for the early adopters with the big budgets to buy it, and because of that prices will never come down enough so the rest of us can afford it.

    Only when a new technology is SO much better than the current available do the earlier adopters buy it and the tech takes off. But there also has to be convincing content for it.

    1. Re:This is the same old problem by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Well, considering that the average person doesn't spend thousands of dollars buying new computers every six months or upgrading their car stereo to shatter windows from a hundred feet away, that doesn't leave much but entertainment systems or power tools on which to waste all their money. Have you ever looked at the prices of the high-end televisions in Best Buy? Fucking insane. Who in their right mind spends $2000 on a television? I guess some people do, because I see them carting those huge boxes outside to their car.

      If you're not buying a new Corvette or 3 GHz Pentium IV with 21" LCD, I guess you might as well upgrade your entertainment center. What else are those stinking rich assholes going to spend their money on? Compact discs?

    2. Re:This is the same old problem by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Funny
      Who in their right mind spends $2000 on a television? I guess some people do, because I see them carting those huge boxes outside to their car.

      Never bought a house then? Thought not.

      Buy a house and you will suddenly find that you end up paying the most ridiculous prices for stuff. It is pretty easy to end up paying $2,000 just to hang wallpaper. And as for curtains. And don't think that you have a choice about it since in matters of this type you will be overulled by she who must be obeyed or you won't get sex for three months.

      So when you get to this point you will find yourself buying a $2000 TV because doing so is much cheaper than redecorating. And at the end of the day you are going to look at the TV much more often tha anything else in your house.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:This is the same old problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get all the sex you want. It's cheaper too in the long run. Click here.

    4. Re:This is the same old problem by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Man alive... is someone bitter about his marriage?

      I mean, Im aware that when you marry you agree to let someone else make decisions on every single penny you will make for the rest of your life, however 2000 USD for putting wallpaper is pretty much absurd.

      I mean how many square meters is that??

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    5. Re:This is the same old problem by The-Bus · · Score: 2
      Who in their right mind spends $2000 on a television?
      Why, me of course. I bought this puppy open-box for $2000 a few months ago, and it's one of the best investments I've made. Sure, our regular cable-feed looks like crap, but DVDs and console systems look great. You can finally play 4-player games and each person gets their own miniature widescreen 19" TV. And Lord of the Rings looks awesome. There's that have these TVs. Sad to say, but I can't go back to a regular TV. If you get used to it long enough you have to buy your own (a few of my friends did/will) -- basically, it's not a waste.

      Now if you don't like TV, or watching movies, or playing video games, then complaining about how people can spend $2000 on a TV is a moot point since you're not an enthusiast to begin with.

      If you want to wonder about people with too much money, go see the Prada store in NYC and find someone who is casually spending $3,500.00 on a jacket. Now that's scary.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    6. Re:This is the same old problem by Openadvocate · · Score: 1

      Hmm, my Sony TV did cost $1500 for at 29" (6 years ago I think). of course I could have gotten their cheaper version for half the price. But I wanted the one with all the SCART,composite,S-VHS connections in the back and front, with the digital cam filter(I think it is called), being able to play both NTSC, PAL etc. and no other had that that really black screen they all where light gray.
      Well, I had my laserdiscs, had my prologic surround sound none of which had caught on here in Europe(and not available in stores) so people were always amazed to see and hear it. heh. But these days I haven't even half of it plugged in anymore.
      Have been thinking about buying a DVD player, but it's just that I don't really watch many movies any more. However now that they have begun shipping Simpsons on DVD, I might have to get one anyway.

      --
      my sig
    7. Re:This is the same old problem by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      Sounds like approx. two adjacent rooms to me.

    8. Re:This is the same old problem by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      Sounds like approx. two adjacent rooms to me.

      Actually three, but they are half panelled.

      The point is that people will balk at $2000 for a TV then go and blow $1000 on a light fixture. When it gets to cars things get even whackier. My car has a sound system with a $2,500 list price, I got it at no extra cost because I bought the floor model. But some people will obviously pay that amount - and then probably gripe about paying the same for a TV.

      I thought the outrage at the Tyco CEO's $6000 'shower curtain' was somewhat amusing since I was quoted $3,000 for one myself. Now I don't know what Kozlowski was buying but I somehow doubt it would have been one of those pvc drapes than hangs from a pole. If you want a glass door type affair they cost a lot.

      Or look at it this way, Bush's war that he wants to start in Iraq will by most accounts cost at least $100 billion. If the occupation costs as much again we are looking at a $2,000 cost for every familly in the US. One would think that the 'liberal media' would be talking about this if $2,000 was a lot of money.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    9. Re:This is the same old problem by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Nope. I'll admit that I've never purchased a house. I always did wonder why my parents spent so much on carpeting, lawn care, paving the driveway, putting in a porch, redecording the living room, and painting the house.

      I kept telling them that they could buy a killer 386 PC for the cost of the driveway, a killer 486 for the porch, a dual processor Pentium III for the carpeting, etc... but they never listened to me.

      All I need is a room for my servers and a mattress. And maybe an air conditioner. Those systems get hot...

  20. Of course... by jvollmer · · Score: 1

    This would be the perfect way to enjoy a piping-hot cup of tea while watching "The Matrix."
    The ointment reservoir, and bandage tray are extra.

  21. Motion Enhanced Drunken Master by Marijuana+al-Shehi · · Score: 5, Funny

    For $20,000 I will come to your home theater, put the Drunken Master DVD in your player, and punch you in the face in perfect synch with the on-screen fighting. Now that's reality!

    --
    "I think all foreigners should stop interfering in the internal affairs of Iraq"
    -- Paul Wolfowitz, 7/21/2003
    1. Re:Motion Enhanced Drunken Master by REDNOROCK · · Score: 0

      It's dubbed, so you'll naturally have about a 1/2 second delay.

      --
      Even if I say something insightfull or inteligent, it doens't matter cause I'm an ass.
  22. Also including.... by TheLostOne · · Score: 1

    Dalvenjah FoxFire writes

    Hmm.. does this mean it comes with spambots? :)

    (sure.. its offtopic.. but its not a !@#$@ profit joke.. that has to count for something right?! :)

    --


    '..that kernel panicked like a nun in a crack house!'
  23. Its a pretty cool toy... by liamk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I saw a demo of this system at a local A/V megaplex. Basically, the system consists of a control box hooked up to four lifts. The lifts sit under a simple platform that you put your couch on. Each lift has two or three inches of travel and can accelerate at up to 2 Gs. Needless to say, it packs quite a punch.

    The dealer played a scene from Jurassic Park 3 where an airplane tries to take off and then subsequently crashes in a jungle. As the plane took off, it felt like the couch had some bass shakers on the bottom. Not a big deal.

    Well, when the plane hit a tree and spun around, my friend and I were nearly thrown from the couch. It felt like a Universal theme park ride. The only downside is that you are really involved in the movie, almost too involved -- it's tough to lay on the couch and relax to an action-packed blood-fest while you're being violently tossed around.

    The motion system is totally standalone. The video and motion sync up through the A/V connection from your DVD player. To start a movie, hit play on the DVD player and select the movie in the Odysee. It does the rest by iteself. I think the sales guy said they had a couple hundred movies already preprogrammed.

    The system costs $20,000 (list) and comes with a year of free updates. After that, if you want more movies, it's $500/year. Not exactly cheap.

    If you're near a Soundtrack/Ultimate Electronics store, they probably have a demo room. It's worth the trip.

    1. Re:Its a pretty cool toy... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      The dealer played a scene from Jurassic Park 3 where an airplane tries to take off and then subsequently crashes in a jungle.

      That's an interesting choice of scene. When I watched this movie when it came on cable, it was the only part I found compelling enough to rewind and play again and again. I thought it was a very nicely done crash scene, IMO one of the most realistic I have seen in movies, compared to videos I have seen of air crashes, and numerous car crashes I have been involved in.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  24. You're not the only one by Marijuana+al-Shehi · · Score: 1

    I'd get behind her!

    --
    "I think all foreigners should stop interfering in the internal affairs of Iraq"
    -- Paul Wolfowitz, 7/21/2003
  25. rumble packs by tmark · · Score: 2

    If this technology is anything like the "rumble packs" in today's joysticks, I'll take a pass.

    Anyways, half the time when you would want the sensation of motion (jet plane taking off ? explosions ? car accelerating ?), there's a lot of noise coming out of your speakers, andif you have a half-decent system, your sofa's probably shaking already.

  26. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope these guys do well! They're just 15 minutes away from me, maybe they're hiring?

  27. Old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was in an issue of Home Theater Magazine like a year ago. They were unimpressed with the few movies the company had ready at the time.

  28. Just remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't watch this movie or you might end up like This

  29. Taronofsky Hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They have a list on their site of the movies they've encoded, including The Matrix, Drunken Master, Star Wars Episode I, and more, though it also has an 'audio driven' mode which will work with any source.

    Note to self: Do not watch Pi with my Odyssee...

  30. Motion simulator? by glwtta · · Score: 2

    Hell, I can simulate you into motion for free, by kicking your fat ass off the couch for once.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  31. Meanwhile... by Dan+Crash · · Score: 0, Troll

    Christopher Reeve is trying to raise money for research that could help people walk and breathe on their own again. (If you go to the link, you can send a e-card to Chris Reeve and an anonymous donor will donate a dollar to in your name to Reeve's Foundation, which will, in turn, give that money out as research grants. It's Snopes approved.)

    My point isn't to be simplistic and say that every dollar you own should be given away to charitable causes -- obviously, it takes a saint to live that way. But $20 grand for a motion simulator for your HOME theater? Seems like distorted priorities to me.

    --
    He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    1. Re:Meanwhile... by bokketies · · Score: 1

      If a man has enough money to buy a 20k home theater my bet is he gives more than enough money to charity as well. It's a question of perspective, not distorted priorities.

      So would you give up your car and donate the money to charity? No, but maybe you would once in a while instead of buying that cup of coffee donate it to Reeve's foundation. A wealthy man will once in a while leave that Lexus at the dealer and donate the money saved to charity.

      To make it even less abstract: consider Bill Gates. When it comes to supporting charity he is second to none. But he does own a house that costs more millions than a camel has fleas. Does that make him have distorted priorities? (Answer: no, but other things do :-) )

    2. Re:Meanwhile... by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

      Obviously, I'm only speaking for myself here. I don't have the magic formula for determining at what price frivolity becomes irresponsible.

      But I don't think it's a matter of perspective, or at least that's too easy.

      Just because you have a ton of money and give a bunch to charity doesn't mean that spending $20,000 on a home motion simulator isn't a shocking waste of the value that money could provide. I guess I just think the more disposable income you have, the greater a responsibility you have to make sure that it's used in the most beneficial ways.

      Here's an analogy for you: The most expensive painting ever sold was a Van Gogh that went for $85.2 million to a private collector. You can buy a reproduction of this painting for $649.

      What do you think? Is it moral to pay $85 mil for a painting for yourself, considering the enormous amount of good that money could do if spent wisely? I don't think so, even if you are Bill Gates. (Or Ghandi, for that matter.)

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    3. Re:Meanwhile... by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      I don't have the magic formula for determining at what price frivolity becomes irresponsible.

      I see what your saying, but really, it's an issue of what you have vs. what you spend. If you were to follow the logic that $20,000 for something that is purly for entertainment/status, then you'd have to chastise anyone with a luxery car knowing full well a cheap Honda gets you from point A to point B just fine.

      That having been said, I'd probably never buy one even if it wouldn't effect me financially, but that's only because it wouldn't appeal to me. But if that floats your boat and you've got the cash, by all means get one.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    4. Re:Meanwhile... by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

      If you were to follow the logic that $20,000 for something that is purly for entertainment/status, then you'd have to chastise anyone with a luxery car knowing full well a cheap Honda gets you from point A to point B just fine.

      I don't know that I'd say the same thing, since a car has some utility as well as entertainment value. But, yeah, the high end of luxury cars I do find a little troubling.

      I've toyed with the idea that maybe some CEO somewhere needs a $100,000 Mercedes to keep up his status with other rich CEOs, so that his company flourishes, but I can't make myself buy it. You can justify anything if that's your standard.

      But if that floats your boat and you've got the cash, by all means get one.

      I just can't buy into that attitude, either. The $85,000,000 that the private collector paid for the Van Gogh painting is revolting to me. I can't see it as anything other than ethically wrong. That $85 mil could've made a real difference in people's lives, a real difference in stem cell research or cancer research. But some guy just wanted to own a picture instead. It floated his boat, so he got one.

      I figure if I have some responsibility to spend $42.50 correctly, the guy who bought the Van Gogh has 2,000,000 times greater a responsibility. If all the wealthy people in the world put as much emphasis on other human beings as they do on jewel-encrusted cellphones, Christopher Reeve (and many others) might be walking by now.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    5. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That $85 mil could've made a real difference
      > in people's lives, a real difference in stem
      > cell research or cancer research.

      What's your point? Now, the dealer who received the $85 million can give it to charity.

    6. Re:Meanwhile... by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

      The point is that there is an entire culture of luxury garbage supported by rich people for their own egos. Rich people own the corporations that make the crap; rich people sell the crap to each other, rich people fawn over each other's crap. While other people starve, die, remain paralyzed, etc.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    7. Re:Meanwhile... by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      You forget that most people who buy expensive art do so (at least partially) as an investment.

      Granted, when the Van Gogh sold for $85M it probably was at the height of conspicious consumption, but chances are if he chose to sell it, he wouldn't lose that much as a percentage.

      The problem is, too many people in this world are motivated by greed, and some of our best advancements to humanity are motivated by that same greed (or lust for power, or fame) above and beyond the pure humanitarian inspiration.

      I would bet that a large number of the doctors who develop a cure for cancer, aids, or help cure Christopher Reeves wouldn't be in that profession if A:) they weren't paid handsomly (and enjoy the luxery items afforded by that salery), and B:) weren't receiving acces to the resources or facilities unless they worked for big medical companies motivated again by money.

      Of course there is that level of extravagance that just seems insane to people like you and me. I would have no want (or need) for jewel encrusted cellphones, but then again I can't understand the attraction towards jewerly that many women have. (Though my favorate example, which made me laugh and slightly nausated at the same time was the diamond covered hand bag emblazed with the star-fleet emblem at the gift shop near the Star Trek experience in Las Vegas).

      But I don't have a problem spending thousands of dollars a year on technology equipment. I really don't need it, I'm not using it to help anyone. I just like it. I derive pleasure from it. This is a pretty large expenditure in relation to my income, and I don't care.

      We all spend large sums of money on things we don't need. All we REALLY need, if we don't have a family, is a roof over our heads and some food. The average single person could afford that working part time at a mini-mart. Instead we create a cycle of consumption that (eventually) trickles over to humanitarian persuits.

      If every technophile slashdot user stoped buying new computers and devoted that money to charity, they would raise far more then the $85 million one man spent on a painting. But they won't, and in certian respects, they shouldn't. Stop buying consumer electronics and computers, economys start to suffer, less money to charities in the long run.

      And that $85 million did make somewhat of a difference in peoples lives. It continued to cement the idea that art is a legitimate asset. If artists can make more money (or money flows to all artists), we end up with more art. I know that seems like a hudge expenditure for a very small and subtle impact on a community, but hey, it's better then nothing.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    8. Re:Meanwhile... by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

      The problem is, too many people in this world are motivated by greed, and some of our best advancements to humanity are motivated by that same greed (or lust for power, or fame) above and beyond the pure humanitarian inspiration...

      This is a really good point.

      I think there's a lot of validity to the idea that we need to harness our own greed in order to solve some of humanity's problems, and that perhaps $85 million dollar paintings are a part of a bigger system that needs greed to function.

      But it's hard to ignore the fact that I still think $20,000 is too much to spend on a motion simulator for a home theater.

      I guess, ultimately, this conversation about greed and excess is really just a way of expressing some disappointment in humanity. There's that Hamlet quote that I always find inspiring:

      What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason! how infinite in faculty! in form, in moving, how express and admirable! in action how like an angel! in apprehension how like a god!

      I feel that way, too. We have the capacity to do almost anything, solve any problem... and yet, we don't. Sometimes we prefer to buy things instead, even if it means others of us will suffer. Me included.

      But I think we can change some of that by pointing it out. Not too many years ago, we were burning witches and practicing trial-by-ordeal. Now we accept that those sorts of things are both ludicrous and horrible. I think maybe by talking about the selfishness and absurdity of some forms of spending, we can get closer to the day when not solving problems like paralysis seems as ludicrous and horrible as witch-burning.

      Anyway, didn't mean to get quite so heavy. Thanks for the thoughtful responses.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    9. Re:Meanwhile... by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      Well it is an important discussion. But I still cling to the idea that wasteful spending is only as absurd in relation to how much money you have to begin with.

      I like to gamble. And for the longest time, it blew me away that there would be people in the middle of the casino betting $10,000 a hand. How can anyone bet a third of the average persons salery and not bat an eye. Then I realized, to these people they are taking out of it the same pleasure and risk that I do making my measly $5 a hand bet.

      And I can't begrudge them that. It's all relitive, and that's a fact of life. The truth is, nobody who's been there can understand the motivation of the extrodinarly wealthy. But from what I've observed, the wealthy have the same ideocyrancies, abitions, or insecurities as the rest of us.

      The billionare who spends $85m on a rare painting is no different then the record store clerk who spends $200 on a rare comic book he's been dreaming of.

      I think I understand where you're coming from, however. There is that issue of having a social responsibility, and spending so much at once at one time seems like a betrayal of that responsibility. To me it doesn't. What is worse in the aggrigate, a billionare spending $85m in one day, or 85 million average Americans throwing away a dollar on a can of soda or cup of coffee they don't need?

      Not only do the super rich spend more money on charity, they spend more of their income as a percentage on them (ok, the motivation may be for taxes, but still). So yeah, it's hard to put it the right perspective, but in the end it works out.

      As a footnote, keep in mind I only absolve them when they don't hurt anyone. (I guess you could argue that they are hurting people by not giving their money up to humanitarian causes... but no more then your average slashdot reader harms them by buying the latest video card instead of throwing the cash into a collection plate). I don't begrudge the super rich for indulging when they can afford it. But when a corporate CEO throws a $3 million birthday party for his wife while crushing the hopes and dreams of thousands of people, that I can never condone.

      I guess I'm going way off an a tangent here, but the point is, it doesn't bother me that some people would spend $20,000 on a motion simulator home theatre. It can't, when I could see myself spending 20% of that on my non-motion enhanced home theatre system.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    10. Re:Meanwhile... by shepd · · Score: 2

      >That $85 mil could've made a real difference in people's lives, a real difference in stem cell research or cancer research.

      Yup. That's why the money changed hands. Eventually it will get there. It all takes time. Eventually the money will pass into someone's hands who will decide to pass it on to those charities.

      If the buyer were to keep that money instead of spending it then those charities would never see a dime from it.

      Money is only good when spent. It's people like Bill Gates, who keep money locked up rather than moving it about that sicken me. The economy, which includes every organization and charity that needs money, can't function with a steady flow of money. Sinking it into a big pit is a waste that does no good.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    11. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop buying consumer electronics and computers, economys start to suffer, less money to charities in the long run

      I don't necessarily think so. If spent intelligently, that money could be used in other ways that would fuel economic growth and improve peoples lives. For example, if everyone who bought, say, a Playstation or an XBOX or the games for those, instead put that money directly to use building schools, buying books for schools, or installing basic services infrastructure, some high-tech jobs would certainly be lost in the gaming industry, but other jobs would open up in building, printing and basic services (such as water/electricity). Moreover, the improved education system would give the *next* generation the proper education they need to then go build and sell things like playstations. Basically, you'd be "pausing" technological progress for a generation or two and using the opportunity to level the playing field and get rid of a lot of poverty in the world for the following generations.

      I do live in a developing country though. The US probably pretty much has basic services and schooling fairly well sorted out, but here in SA, although it is improving, millions of people still don't even have basic services like running water, and most of the schools are run-down and lack proper schooling equipment like proper text books. That single amount of 85-mil US$ alone could be used to install running-water infrastructure for over half a million people. Or it could be used to buy over 10 million school text books (at say R80 a schoolbook). Or it could be used to build probably a couple dozen new schools. These things could make very real differences to the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. Yes, art is a legitimate asset. Surely something is wrong when you are sending out a message to society that a painting is more important than running water for hundreds of thousands of people.

      Obviously though the 85mil was some individuals money, and we cannot dictate how other people spend their own (legimitately obtained) money. I personally may think its disgusting for rich people to buy huge mansions with private gyms, or to buy private yachts etc, or for women to buy $3000 pairs of shoes, when millions of children on our planet are dying of starvation each year. But its their money. Yes, the money does go to help *someone* (e.g. the employees of the factory making the $3000 shoes), but proportionally, the expenditure could be helping many more people.

      There are so many "worthy causes" on this planet that I think its a bit sad that most people would rather spend their money on their next pack of cigarettes or their next computer game, but thats the way people are.

    12. Re:Meanwhile... by dhalgren · · Score: 1

      Jesus. I thought Reaganomics died in the 80s. :(

    13. Re:Meanwhile... by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Jesus. I thought Reaganomics died in the 80s. :(

      And I thought they took the hardcore Socialists with them.

      You aren't having trouble with how a capitalist economy functions and therefore lashing out at me because you feel inept, are you? I can explain in more detail if you'd like -- perhaps that would calm you down.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    14. Re:Meanwhile... by dhalgren · · Score: 1

      From disagreement to Hardcore Socialism in one step. I may have misjudged you.

      I am quite comfortable with the workings of a capitalist economy, thanks. However, I can't agree that trickle-down economics works equally well in all cases regardless of the situation, as you are implying.

      That's why the money changed hands. Eventually it will get there. It all takes time. Eventually the money will pass into someone's hands who will decide to pass it on to those charities.

      That may certainly be true for some of the money--but a case could hardly be made that this is to be expected for all, or even a substantial percentage, of it. At least, not based on the information at hand.

      And that's what bothers me about this sort of blanket apologism: the message that "It all gets to the little guy in the end, and that's why the big guys should have and spend it". It may be true that some fraction of the conspicuous consumption of the rich ends up getting spent on research, housing, or other projects. That is not true for most of it.

      "Decorate Expensively for the Poor!" doesn't really work.

    15. Re:Meanwhile... by shepd · · Score: 1

      >From disagreement to Hardcore Socialism in one step.

      Maybe it's just me, but when people start accusing me of using "Reaganomics" when I think I'm just trying to explain Capitalism 101 I get a little displeased.

      Heck, I'm Canadian, and I wasn't even a teenager when Reagan was Prez, so maybe I am using Reaganomics. Maybe it isn't even so bad. Beats the hell out of me. But by the tone of your sentence, I think we would both agree it was a slight at me.

      >That may certainly be true for some of the money--but a case could hardly be made that this is to be expected for all, or even a substantial percentage, of it.

      No disagreement on this...

      >And that's what bothers me about this sort of blanket apologism: the message that "It all gets to the little guy in the end, and that's why the big guys should have and spend it".

      I'm not apologizing for them. I'm just looking at the decisions the guy buying the painting/useless stuff could make, and where the money will end up:

      The choices/consequnces were:

      - Don't spend it. Keep it, and in xx years, when he dies, his family gets it. How they spend it is unclear -- however, one can assume a family with family members this rich is likely to have all the money they need already, anyways, and would just pocket the money too. Net effect: $0 to charity.
      - Put the money in an investment. The money gets used by various companies to purchase goods and services. Regular people get paid to do these jobs, and lots of people benefit. It's unclear if the charity will get much money, but I think it would be safe to assume that some of it would eventually land in the hands of that charity. Net effect: Slighty more than $0 to charity.
      - Money gets spent on the painting. Money made by original owner of painting could go to anything, but at least some of it goes to workers at the sale, and one can assume the money made by the sellor will be spent on running their trade, and so more workers are paid. Again, we can assume slightly more than $0 goes to charity, but possibly less than the investment option.
      - Money goes straight to the charity. Obviously, this is best for the charity, but we already know most people don't give something away for nothing, so expecting someone to do that is a pipe dream.

      Best, most likely, choices: Investment, or buying the painting.

      But that's just the way I see it...

      >"Decorate Expensively for the Poor!" doesn't really work.

      Someone at the "bottom" always gets paid, though. The plubmer moving the pipes in the way of making the house look nice, the electrician putting power in for the new super-expensive-power-eating-lamps, the people at the power plant for his new lighting system, people at the wallpaper company for making the wallpaper, guy at the burger joint when the decorter gets hungry, etc, etc.

      If everyone would participate, a system where everyone donated their money to various causes (including the "feed everyone" cause) would work. But I think world history shows this is impossible, and that such a system often contradicts basic freedoms, so we have to make the next best choice.

      I think the current system is it. Just my $0.02, and you don't need to take it all that seriously...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    16. Re:Meanwhile... by dhalgren · · Score: 1


      OK, essentially what you said here is what I
      was trying to say. However, we can pretty much
      assume that nobody keeps that kind of cash in a
      sock under the pillow. So it's invested in
      some way; it's working. That will likely create
      as much work over the long term as a sudden
      fluctuation would create in the short term. It's not guaranteed or even necessarily likely
      to change the world situation much either way.




      At any rate, I again agree with most of your
      second post. But so many people believe the
      message given in your first--and stop there,
      not thinking any further--and use that kind of
      view to rationalize gross consumption. That's
      what my problem is with; not you.

  32. And.. That keeps your different pets away !!! by pruneau · · Score: 1

    I just can imagine our cats reaction to the system in action (woOoOoF). Eventually, they will give up their landlordship on the couch. Oh heaven: no more f..ing hairs, no more fight for the best place. Now, adding a feature as useful as the "random triggerering of the jumping couch" syndrome to the system will be definitely coOoOo0l.

    But Twenty Grands, I can buy a car for that, and obtain very real impressions with it too, though for more $500 of maintenance a year.

    Anyway, we have one of those park in montreal where they have a movie theater with 3D glasses and seat motion.

    ...And I HATE it, because you cannot both look at the movie, hold on to your glasses and avoid to puke at the same time.
    --
    [Pruneau /\o^O/\ warranty void if this .sig is removed]
    1. Re:And.. That keeps your different pets away !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your cat goes "WooOooOOoOoF", you've got the bass up WAY too high.

    2. Re:And.. That keeps your different pets away !!! by Exiler · · Score: 1

      You could hack it to violently fling anything that ways less than 20 pounds off it, just not it you have kids ^_^

      I could totally see cats being launched out windows with this...

      --
      Banaaaana!
  33. I would pay... by digitalsushi · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Well, I think it's neat. I would pay up to 300 dollars for the controller unit, and 85 dollars per lift, if it can do 4 couches total (16 lifts). And I would buy 4, not 16. But my living room is in a better setup than theirs. I think I even have a jpeg... *looks* oh look at that, yes i do. http://digitalsushi.com/konton/livingroom/ You know whats funny is that I am not an audiophile. If you swapped those crap Bose 301s and Boston whatevers (a further tribute that I dont know what models they are) with some 20k dollar rig, I wouldnt even notice. Anyhoo, I figured I'd post that link since it was already there. I like seeing other people's personal LAN/office setups, and living room setups. It's too bad I dont have a camera that can get the wide tight shot that is my LAN, cause its cooler than my living room- I never spend time in there. Maybe thats why I've been here 4 months and the nintendo is still unplugged. Thing that ticks me off is that I get a 99/100 signal rating to DirectTV, and I average about 20 minutes of television daily (so like 2 or 3 shows a week)- DirectTV made me sign a one year contract where I can't bust out. Lame huh. Sorry for the wild rambling- hey anyone else have pics of their setups? (the theme of mine is that I have the coolest speaker stand on slashdot (little lights on a dimmer run under all the cloth- it diffuses!) and that I have no idea what my equipment is.. heck I dont even have a sub in that room!)

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  34. drunken master? by e-r00 · · Score: 1

    Well, knowing how they make sound-fx for hong-kong karate movies, do we really need all of these fancy equipment to hear the sound of a towel hitting a chair?:) for the 'drunken master' something much better would be a *taste* simulation :)

    1. Re:drunken master? by evilempireinc · · Score: 1

      simulation? I got your simulation right here for $15 a case!

      --
      we can rebuild this sig. we have the technology
    2. Re:drunken master? by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Well, is it the old Drunken Master movie with a young Jackie Chan, or the newer Drunken Master movie with an older Jackie Chan?

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  35. Coverage in current Widescreen Review Magazine by MrCaseyB · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was cruising through this months Widescreen Review Magazine few weeks ago and read a detailed review of this system. My first impression was that it was gimmicky bull$hit, further reading changed my mind and I am now looking to demo one of these units in person. I will not be buying it though, just want a test drive.

    You can read part of the article by going to
    http://www.widescreenreview.com/attractions/eqre v5 .html

    Pick up this months Widescreen Review for the full article and a whole lot more.

  36. A rumble pack for your DVD player by REDNOROCK · · Score: 0

    Thats what this is! Man, first 3d lcd displays, motion driven couches, next thing up is a smell-o-vision! I'm sure that would be color driven, for movies that don't have their smells preprogrammed in.

    --
    Even if I say something insightfull or inteligent, it doens't matter cause I'm an ass.
  37. One pair of ears by fedor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's better to improve recording technology rather than producting expensive speaker systems to improve 'natural sound'. As long as people have two ears, two signals are enough to recreate 3D sound in our brains. As long as I'm sitting on a couch while listening to the soundtrack of a movie while watching the screen, I don't want to move my head to listen to the superfluous speakers.

    --
    :wq!
    1. Re:One pair of ears by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      As long as people have two ears, two signals are enough to recreate 3D sound in our brains. As long as I'm sitting on a couch while listening to the soundtrack of a movie while watching the screen, I don't want to move my head to listen to the superfluous speakers.

      Okay, that's quite true. You do only need two signals for perfect reproduction of 3D sound--if you never move your head. Unfortunately, you do move. And turn. The extra speakers are to preserve the illusion of a three-dimensional sound environment even for an observer that isn't tied in one place and completely unable to move.

      In principle, if a movie viewer had a pair of headphones coupled to a sensor to monitor head position and angle and the movie had encoded information about the precise location of each and every sound source within each scene and the system could adjust the sound fed to your ears fast enough to prevent a disorienting disjoint between sound and visuals...then maybe two speakers would be enough for 3D sound--per audience member.

      That said, you're right--there are a lot of movies out there with poorly-recorded/edited/engineered sound, and that can't be fixed no matter how clever your home theatre system is.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  38. Killa deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lemme get this straight, for 20 grand I can have my couch vibrate when things make noise on my TV?

    Hmmm... idea:
    1. Dissect sound-activated "Dancing Coke Cans"
    2. Buy female sex toys in bulk
    3. ...
    4. Profit!

  39. What you are really thinking about by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Funny
    Pain stimulators? i'm waiting for pleasure stimulators. Then my porn collection would be SO much more enjoyable.

    Letsee for $20,000 you can do what? Make the couch vibrate gently. Methinks that the system you are after is gonna cost a whole lot more.

    In comparison for roughly $200 you can go get the real thing in a legalized establishment in Nevada. So for the price of your automated bonk-o-matic you can have a bonk a week for over two years.

    In Europe of course your capital investment will go a lot further. Invested in an interest bearing account you could engage the Euro 50 services of a window girl 32 times a year - about once every 10 days from the interest alone.

    At least that is what a cursory search of the Internet implies.

    Of course you may say that it is a real sad type who goes to visit prostitutes, but what does that make the folk using the bonk-o-matic???

    Of course life being unfair it turns out that the female anatomy is considerably more compatible with artificial coitus. Examples may be found on the Web. Unfortunately it appears that these guys are rather more interested in the subject from the male point of view. For example one would think that from the pure engineering point of view, solenoids would provide a more effective basic technology for their purposes than rotory motors with sun and planet drives.

    Also rather than have the device synchronized to a video track one would think that biometric feedback to determine what types of stimulation are being best received.

    Sorry but I don't think I want to put any part of my anatomy into a device of that kind (or for that matter have it inserted into me).

    But they are a little bit more interesting than yet another case mod hack.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  40. great minds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn, that's exactly what i thought of at first, too!

  41. You must be crazy!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    20.000$!!!! For this budget, I prefer a YBA Line 1

  42. At the very least by kaladorn · · Score: 2

    ... one would want to check the box to make sure it wasn't an MS bonk-o-matic which might give a whole new meaning to "blue screen of death".

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    1. Re:At the very least by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 5, Funny

      My MSBonk crashed. Now I have the blue balls of death.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
  43. Most slashdot geeks, could build their own by nexusone · · Score: 1

    I myself have access to a unit with full 360 motion and big screen TV....
    Draw back is you have to strap yourself to the seat. No drinks or popcorn...

    Most slashdot geeks, could build one for a few hundred dollars with some spare parts and a used computer.

    --
    Wise men speak because they have something to say, Fools because they have to say something!!!!
  44. Motion Sickness by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    I have a hard time sometimes with a dark room and my 55 inch Mitsubishi.

    Throw in active movement and it'd be rough.

    No screwdrivers with that puppy, OJ makes me get extra motion sickness.

  45. Ouch. by kaladorn · · Score: 2

    The side effects might even include a guest appearance on "Cops!" as "Male Corpse #2".

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  46. Hmmmm by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 1

    OK so the company that makes this programs certain movies to be optimized for the effects, while there is a direct sound input option which would likely offer much less precision to the experiance. I wonder when individual movie studios will be making deals with them for exclusive vibrations or something? Like how TiVo did that thing where it forced people to tape a TV show because they bent to corporate pressure, maybe these guys will send people through the roof with Matrix Reloaded bu sort of... jiggle with Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. Hmmmm....

    --
    Yup...
  47. Re:Motion Sickness-Movies & TV with kick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see it now:

    The Perfect Storm: Comes with a bucket.

    Airplane: Comes with a barf bag.

    Opening credits to Gilligans Island: Comes with a barf bag, and a traction kit.

    Fight Club: Comes with a paramedic.

    Top Gun: Comes with a box of pampers.

    Debbie does Dallas: Comes with...Hey! Stop that!

  48. Nature's solution by Tablizer · · Score: 2


    We have natural motion simulation here in California. We call the technology "earthquakes".

    The only hard part is synching them to the picture. But there are plenty of unemployed Silli Valley techies here to help figure that part out.

  49. The real machine is here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This machine is a joke. The real machine is here.

  50. Pretend you've already got it! by PanBanger · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can pretend you already have it, but the only movie you can watch is My Dinner With Andre.

  51. You laugh but... by Poison-R · · Score: 1

    We actually did something like that "back in the day" using an old recliner while playing Doom.. The effect was there but the recliner only lasted about a week before the arms fell off :)

    --
    PR
  52. This ain't shit. by unicron · · Score: 2

    Just bury $5,000 worth of subwoofers under your couch, same thing.

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  53. Smell-a-vision next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's next? Smell-a-vision so we can smell the burning carnage in the next action flick?

  54. Subsonic actuator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah, $20,000???

    I got one of these things + amp for $30 from my local electronics shop [Jaycar electronics]

    Works great too, but might not be too good for the structual integrity of the house :)

  55. Re:This is the same old problem-Bartering. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Buy a house and you will suddenly find that you end up paying the most ridiculous prices for stuff."

    If you have a particular skill, or just lots of desirable stuff you don't want. You can use the barter system to comfortably outfit your house.

    http://www.barterconsultants.com/abc.html
    http: //www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_20 /b3732172.htm
    http://www.ivillage.com/work/wfh/ar ticles/0,10109, 195652_197976,00.html
    http://stout.mybravenet.coh ttp://stout.mybravenet. com/public_html/h/pbb-9.htm
    m/public_html/h/pbb-9 .htm

  56. You have a small penis, don't you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    subject says it all folks...

  57. Nice toy, but not worth $20K by vanyel · · Score: 2

    I had a chance to experience this at this summer's Street of Dreams in Portland, OR ($750K-$2M+ spec homes open to the public for a few weeks). They were showing part of the Quidditch match from Harry Potter. After sitting through about as much time of ads as they showed of the clip, it actually did a respectable job, but I don't think I'd actually like to watch an entire movie being bounced around --- it's much better technology for a few minute ride than a 2-hr movie.

  58. Quick sue the pants off of them!!! by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 2
    They have a list on their site of the movies they've encoded, including The Matrix, Drunken Master, Star Wars Episode I, and more
    Look, look! They're modifying the movies! Adding motion...deleting violence...why can't we just leave the movies the way the directors created them! :)
    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  59. ahem by Cyberop5 · · Score: 1

    WEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!


    dang, there goes my homework

    --
    Urgo: "I want to live. I want to experience the universe and I want to eat pie!"
    Jack: "Who doesn't??"
  60. The 'Real' Cinema Experience by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 1

    And, coming soon..... the real experience. A lousy back seat, or one really close to the screen. Annoying 7 year-olds-screaming and laughing at all the wrong parts, and your token 16year old, throwing popcorn at his mates. On the other side of you. Repeatedly. Would anyone really pay for an 'enhanced' experience? Or is watching the film on DVD, surround sound and features not enough, you need to spill your drinks and popcorn as well, during the high speed car chase?

  61. dont know what to do with my 20 grand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee..i got 20 grand...what shall i do..:

    get an escort girl over every weekend for..20000/200=1000 weeks...get layed every weekend for three years!

    Or i could buy a second hand 911...nice..talk about an immersing experience. have you ever had the backside break out and had to correct with the throttle?

    buy a windglider and take lessons flying..

    20000 will even get met around the world..

    NO Wait! I know...I will buy a 20.000 device which makes all the CRAP from hollywood feel more real by moving the couch..yeah...now there's a life-improving investment. forget about the escort, i'll watch porn..forget about the porsche..i'll watch the Fast and the furious! and the windglider? I can always...watch another movie..?

    whatever. Ofcourse if you allready have a porsche, and an incredible wife and you already know how to fly..
    This is surely the thing you've been waiting for..the one thing that will make your life complete.

  62. And in other news... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    ...Another company invents a system called "Obesity", to get the couch potatoes into motion. :-)

  63. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    * This is complicated. Has to do with interrupts. Thus, I am
    * scared witless. Therefore I refuse to write this function. :-P
    -- From the maclinux patch

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...