Slashdot Mirror


Integrated 3D Graphics Motherboard Round-Up

Keefe writes "In the recent past, integrated video was seldom a viable solution for hardcore computer gamers. Enthusiasts shunned from motherboards with integrated video, and opted to buy ones without it, in additional to a much faster ATi or Nvidia-powered graphics accelerator. Today, the picture is beginning to change. The last few integrated motherboards sported decent graphics chipsets, like the Nvidia NForce (GeForce2 MX), ATI IGP320 (Radeon VE), or Intel 845G. Techware Labs has taken a look at the current integrated 3D video chipsets on the market and concluded how they perform in the latest 3D software."

6 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. postgresopengl by j1mmy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The motherboard in our DB machine at work has an ATI Rage chip integrated. Especially useful for rendering our logs in 3D. It doesn't support vertex shaders, though, so the lighting on the timestamps is kind of shoddy.

  2. Re:Good enough for gamers? by nilstar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It does make sense from this perspective - integrate a cheap graphics core now. If the consumer wants to upgrade, most of these core have an AGP slot (if the mobo maker has one that is). Cheap now, Cheap later (when an decent AGP card usable for then-in-styles games is cheap).

    It is also cheap in the future - when these mobos become outdated the law of supply & demand (and discounting) - will make this cheaper than the then-current motherboard - with the added caveot that you can build a really cheap system (ie, no vid card) - or you can buy an AGP card.... as some solutions like Nforce 2 have superiour memory controller solutions - even compared to intel/via's next generation (dual channel ddr for example).

    --
    ===> An eye for an eye makes everyone blind - MG
  3. Re:Uhh... by Ciannait · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I take it you haven't really looked at the specs for this integrated chipset.

    While it's convenient to think that there are two and only two groups of users - the ubergamers, and the drooling morons - this isn't the case. If it were, there would be two, and only two, cards on the market. The "eke out 3 more fps in Q3A" card, and the "maybe it'll play The Sims" card.

    These integrated chipsets have a lot of nice features, including digital 5.1 sound. It's essentially like having a GeForce4 MX (a card I have in my machine at home) with a good quality sound-card - only, two fewer cards to buy.

    Not everyone likes having a mess of cards in their PC. Not everyone needs bleeding edge. Lots of people are perfectly happy not having the latest-greatest.

    That's who this integrated chipset is for.

    --
    A good traveller has no fixed plans and is not intent on arriving.
  4. Video for the Masses by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't be elitist. There are plenty of gamers out there that can't bloody afford the latest and greatest, much less upgrade every two years (6 months?). Some folks are actually interested in knowing what the best integrated video is, even if it doesn't compare to your Robocop 6000 SUX.

    If only they had a sample of the NVIDIA nForce2 to compare. Then again, maybe they did -- anyone seen a mirror? I loaded their page once, it linked a supposed mirror, but it was for a 40x CDRW review...

  5. Re:Uhh... by epukinsk · · Score: 5, Funny

    These motherboards are trying to fill a niche that doesn't exist.

    You mean the OEMs-looking-for-cheap-marketable-components market?

    Yeah, that market never existed, never will. What are these guys thinking?

    Erik

  6. Re:Video on motherboard == Stupid. by stew77 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Then WTF would you want an integrated graphics chip?

    You save
    • money
    • space
    • cooling
    • installation trouble

    And if you use your computer not for 3D work or gaming, there probably won't be a reason to upgrade for the next 3 years. Doing my daily work, I can't tell a difference between a TNT and a GeForce4.