Slashdot Mirror


High-Speed Data Transfer Over ... Mud

An anonymous reader writes "You might have laid Ethernet through some pretty aggressive environments, but how about through a 4-inch diameter steel pipe immersed in electrically conductive mud at pressures up to 1000 atmospheres, temperatures up to 150 deg C, and with vibrational accelerations of hundreds of g? The Department of Energy has announced the invention of a system to allow data transmission up to 1 Mbit/s along drillpipe. That might not sound too fast, but the current technology uses some pretty neat electromechanical engineering to get ... 10 bits per second (on a good day). This will revolutionize the oil industry's ability to see where its wells are going and steer them into pockets of oil."

51 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. M.U.D. by newr00tic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read this as M.U.D. at first (Multi User Dungeon).

    "While you drill for oil, you see a vibrant pixie nearby".
    "Something is scribbled in the mud here.."

    The message in the mud reads:
    "high-speed network via M.U.D. is under construction; announce it on /."

    Possible exits: Down, Up, Home

    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
  2. 1 MB/s? by octalc0de · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why do you need 1 MB/s for a big honking DRILL? The drill doesn't need all that bandwidth.... or perhaps it needs to fulfill its porn fill of the day? ;)

    1. Re:1 MB/s? by packeteer · · Score: 2

      The drill isn't the only thing sending data. They are trying to scan and map underground so that they cna steer the drill.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:1 MB/s? by bunyip · · Score: 5, Funny

      I agree, no drill bit is ever going to need more that 640 Kbits / second.

  3. Re:oil companies by djward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, this is good environmentally. With better drilling tech, more oil can be obtained from fewer wells, reducing the need to "explore" places like ANWAR.

  4. More than mud? by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe eventually they can put that dust collecting above the ceiling tiles at our school to good use. I mean, the layer is about five inches thick.
    Or, they could just use wifi...

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:More than mud? by JabberWokky · · Score: 5, Funny
      Oh, that? That's just asbestos.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  5. Mud + 802.11b by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, if you used that mud as a 802.11b antenna or something, you would be WARMUDSLINGING!

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
  6. Hunh? by mindstrm · · Score: 2, Informative

    "This is why 2.4Ghz wireless has become popular. 2.4Ghz was chosen for wireless networking because the frequency is the same as the resonance of trees and bricks, which means signals on that carrier wave can penetrate those objects leading to greater coverage."

    Resonant materials stop the signal in it's tracks.

    2.4 GHZ is almost useless at penetrating brick and trees. It requires true line of sight. 900Mhz is far better at penetrating these things than 2.4Ghz is.

    Dense wood full of water (trees) or brick / concrete walls are the enemy of 2.4Ghz.

    2.4Ghz was chosen because the band was there, and the higher frequency allowed greater data transmission than 900Mhz. For penetration of our everyday living space, 2.4Ghz is relatively shitty.

  7. Re:Hunh? Does that trolling hook? by victim · · Score: 2

    So does that trolling hook hurt when you bite it?

    (Those rig workers are going to need to be careful with that 1 megawatt transmitter in the 2GHz range.)

  8. Re:Something like 2.4GHz would work a treat by encrypted · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work for an ISP that supplies connections soley via 2.4ghz, infact our entire backbone is a mixture of 2.4 and 5.8, and trust me when I say 2.4 is stubborn, it hates solid objects and water, water is evil, becuase water resinates at 2.4 aswell. Mud is semi-solid and wet, 2.4 wouldnt stand a chance.

  9. That's Nothing! by Jouster · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've had to put Cat5 through sales and marketing cubes!

    Much easier communication than the old "pulsed-bullshit" telemetry, though.

    Jouster

  10. slashdot by isorox · · Score: 2

    hurrah, 1mbit is worthy of a slashdotting, on three...

  11. more details by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Informative
    The key to the new system is a unique non-contacting coupler embedded in connections between 30-foot long sections of drill pipe. The coupler permits data to be sent across the connection and on through a high-speed cable attached to the inner pipe wall.

    For more than 60 years, engineers have struggled with the problem of a drill pipe connection, or "tool joint," that would stand up to the wear and tear of increasingly hostile downhole drilling conditions, yet provide reliable electrical connections every 30 feet over thousands of feet of pipe penetrating deep into some of nature's harshest environments. [...]

    But the excruciatingly slow pace of mud pulse telemetry - 3 to 10 bits per second - often meant that data resolution was so poor that the driller could not make crucial decisions in real time. Often, time-consuming operations would be required to retrieve the downhole data or drilling would have to stop while other procedures were employed to confirm the low-resolution data pulsed to the surface.

    And there is this link, complete with pretty graphics, from the company that actually developed the technology

    http://www.grantprideco.com/gptechnologies/Intelli Pipe.asp

    have fun

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  12. Oh, great, I can see it now.... by Jouster · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I run my drill on Linux! There's a public-domain webserver where you can view the realtime stats!"

    Ugh, /.'ed drillpipe.

    Jouster

    1. Re:Oh, great, I can see it now.... by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      "I run my drill on Linux! ..."

      That's right, and any oil pumped through it must have the source code for the drill software. Any gas produced from teh oil must then contain the code for the oil and the drill. The gas that's produced can only be run in non proprietary engines and the owner of the engine can request the source for the drill at any time.

  13. Re:Something like 2.4GHz would work a treat by adolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bzzt.

    High-frequency RF does not penetrate earth very well.

    2.4GHz signals, in particular, are very trouble-prone in this application, as water converts it to heat more efficiently than any other frequency. Drilling is a very wet operation.

    Hint: this is why your microwave operates at 2.4GHz, and why the band is unlicensed. Because it is so readily absorbed by masonry, trees, and other relatively wet objects, it was deemed (at least a few years ago) relatively unsuitable for serious communications and kept from being sold commercially since the beginning of time.

    Have you never driven through a tunnel with the radio on, or while using a cell phone? FM radio is down near 100MHz, well into the range of relatively slow data transfer.

    You need VLF radio to get through that much solid crap, and once you do that, you're back into the slothly realm of measuring things in bits per minute.

    'sides, aiming a 1-megaWatt microwave oven down a drill pipe would not make their already-existing heat problems any better...

  14. Re:Something like 2.4GHz would work a treat by Jouster · · Score: 2
    Either way, wireless (radio) is the way to go when sending a signal through an electrically busy area. This is why wireless networking is popular in power stations, since fiber optics tend to suck up too much interference.
    Ouch.

    Wireless (including radio frequencies) sucks in electrically busy areas.

    If your fiber optics are sucking up interference, dear god, sue the vendor for substituting a cotton string for fiber optics. Fiber is immune to non-spliced-in interference, and single-mode fiber is all but un-fuck-with-able.

    Jouster
  15. Re:Dungeon? (Re:M.U.D.) by Jouster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Multi-User Dungeon
    Multi-User Domain
    Multi-User Dimension
    Multiple User Domain
    Multiple User Dialogue
    Mauve Ugly Ducks ... and the list goes on.

    Jouster

  16. For more information on the origin of this problem by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out Schlumberger www.slb.com. They're the 800 lb gorilla of the oilfield services industry. Their original solution to finding what was going on at the other end of a drilling rig was to simply pulse mud. Switch it on and off and measure the changes in this signal on the end of the drilling rig. When drilling a rig mud is used to stabilize the walls of the shaft . The advantage of this technique is this... No circular conductor built into the pipe means it can be adapted easily to old equipment and its cheaper. This new system described will eventually make its gains... but its gonna be a while... I saw someone mention wireless... Totally unfriendly environment and there is WAY to much noise, not to mention these holes are so deep you're not going to penetrate all the way back up the hole to the rig on the surface. Anyway... that's a really basic description of what the old new and a couple considerations are in the industry... Look up Schlumberger for a little more info... or Halliburton...

  17. Re:oil companies by dbrutus · · Score: 2

    Actually, at ANWAR, they're projecting only using ice roads so, you don't even get to count the road area as 'despoiled'. The roads melt away during the non-winter months.

  18. I am going to implement this on monday by w1r3sp33d · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is awesome, I am going to the office in waders and I am going to start packing in mud,pipes, and oil through the new HR department!

    I am going to get away with it because I will link this article in an email to engineering discussing how this will avoid the plenum/firecode problem with UTP. I will send a second email to accounting discussing the massive ROI on using mud over expensive cabling projects.

    The the only part that will be better than watching their email open for two hours will be watching them cry about having to process my raise and promotion! This is the first Monday I have looked forward to in a LONG time, THANKS /.!

  19. You get her sister by mtec · · Score: 2, Funny

    to introduce you to her.

    Maybe take her to a movie and dinner....

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  20. Spend less on Fossil Fuels more on Alternatives OT by Neil+Watson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Wouldn't it be better if the Department of Energy had spent the money for this project on utilizing renewable resources instead?

    While I'm ranting. If western nations had have spent some of the money they used to design and build weapons to protect foriegn oil interests on renewable energy solutions instead; couldn't much of the middle east situation have been avoided?

  21. Re:Another sign of the Apocalypse by Jouster · · Score: 2

    He's had it for a while.

    Where else do you think spam originates?

    Jouster

  22. Re:Radio interview about this by Jouster · · Score: 2

    My god, mods, actually CLICK THE LINK!

    They crack up laughing at the end.

    Not to mention my favorite part of the "interview": "C.U.M.W.A.D. - Commications Under Mud Wireless Access Device".

    By the way, it's only one guy, running his voice through EAX Pitch +/-, from the sound of it.

    Jouster

  23. Re:1 MB/s? Here's a guess... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why do you need 1 MB/s for a big honking DRILL?

    Well, for starters you could put an array of accoustic, microwave, or electrical transmitters & sensors in the pipe just BEHIND the drill and image the region ahead of the drill with radar and/or sonar. If you see a pocket of something that sounds/conducts/reflects like oil a bit off to one side, you can adjust the drill to curve in that direction (or send the NEXT one over that way).

    10 BPS just doesn't cut it for uploading imaging information, even if you put most of the fancy processing down with the sensore. But T1 rates are just fine.

    There's lots of other stuff you want to monitor - temperature, pressure, conductivity, etc. to find out what sort of stuff you're drilling through.

    And it's important to know when to give up, stop pouring money down THIS hole and start over somewhere else. It costs a LOT to run the rig long enough to drill even another foot...

    I recall, back in the early days, a company in Ann Arbor made a little board with a CMOS Z80-clone, a ROM with a BASIC interpreter, a serial port, and a few I/O ports - including some analog inputs. They sold a LOT of 'em to an oil company.

    Seems that every now and then they would pull up the drill and send one of these down to measure some stuff. Then they would send the drill down behind it and grind it up. It was cheaper to buy a new one (and the associated cable) each time than to leave the rig idle long enough to pull the old one up. (And considering how fast a winch can crank, and how much custom computer stuff cost back in those days, that will tell you a lot about the per-minute cost of an oil rig and drilling team.)

    So imagine how much they can save if they don't need to pull the DRILL up - disassembling it as they go - then reverse the whole process to put it back down, every time they want to take another reading.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  24. does that mean--free networking hardware? by g4dget · · Score: 2
    under a project funded by the U.S. Department of Energy.

    It's wonderful that the DOE pays for networking for needy companies. Is the DOE also going to fund my upgrade to 802.11a? I really need something faster than I have right now.

  25. Good God! by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Funny

    In one fell swoop, every citizen in the entire country of Elbonia would suddenly have broadband access... if only they had computers.

    ~Philly

  26. Re:nothing new by susano_otter · · Score: 2

    What makes this article news is the sudden jump in bandwidth over the current technology: from 10bps to 1Mbps. That's a 100x increase, which sounds pretty interesting to me. I mean, if Cisco came to you and said their new switches could pass 10,000% more data per second, would you blow them off, saying "sorry, but packet switching is old news, not interested"?

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  27. This might put an end to those complaints... by Niahak · · Score: 2, Funny

    "My modem is slower than mud"...

  28. is DOE the marketing dept of this company? by jukal · · Score: 2
    To me it seems really odd that a specific product of a specific company is marketed so openly without any critic on a .gov website. Is that a common practise there in the US?

    "The IntelliPipe is one of the most remarkable advances in drilling technology in the last 25 years," Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham said. "President Bush, in the National Energy Policy, directed me to pursue advanced technology in energy production. I think the IntelliPipe is exactly the type of technology we need to move our domestic production capabilities into the next century."

    That sounds like it's fresh out from the TV shop.

  29. Re:Spend less on Fossil Fuels more on Alternatives by NeMon'ess · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The western nations spent as much money on weapons as they thought was neccessary, combined with personal greed and kickbacks. Western Nations feared being conquered by the USSR and communism. Ask an oversimplified questiong, get an oversimplified answer.

  30. Pretty cool problem. by Dr_Marvin_Monroe · · Score: 2

    As I was waiting for the link to load, I was guessing how this might be accomplished.....Pretty cool solution to this problem. The non-contact electrical connection was the most innovative thing about this. Looks like it uses an inductive ring at either end of the pipe to pass the signal.

    With a little rework, existing pipes could be make to be "intelligent" like this too. You could, for instance, drop a small inductive "washer" at each of the joints and drop the cable in through the pipe. You'd only need to drill a small hole at each end of the pipe to make the connection between the washer and cable inside. I know that this is over-simplifying the situation, but my guess is that existing pipes could be reworked for perhaps $200 per segment in quantity.

  31. Re:Something like 2.4GHz would work a treat by Phil+Karn · · Score: 2
    Water does not resonate at 2.4 GHz. That's a very common misconception based on the fact that microwave ovens operate there, and they heat water.

    Water does have resonances, but at much higher frequencies. There's a moderate water vapor resonance at 22 GHz and a much stronger one at 183 GHz.

    Water is a polar molecule, so an alternating electric field at any frequency will tend to jerk it around and heat it up. In the low microwave range, the higher the frequency the more effectively water absorbs RF, which is why Ku-band satellites at 11-12 GHz are more affected by rain than C-band satellites at 4 GHz. So 2.4 GHz is actually less affected by water than many higher frequencies used for communications through the atmosphere.

    So why not use the actual water resonance frequencies in microwave ovens? One, tradition: 2.4 GHz is an FCC allocation for Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) devices, including ovens. Two, 2.4 GHz magnetrons are cheap and reasonably efficient. Three, higher frequencies would be harder to contain; seals, seams, screen holes and the like would be proportionately larger at higher frequencies. Four, you don't want to use a resonant frequency, as that would only heat the outer layer of the food, leaving the inside cold and raw!

  32. Scientist are now hard at work by jhines · · Score: 2

    Now that the bandwidth is available, these same engineers are now working on porn and MP3 players for the drill bits to suck that up.

  33. Re:Something like 2.4GHz would work a treat by freaq · · Score: 2, Informative
    adolf said,
    Drilling is a very wet operation.
    say what? try _can_be_.

    some drilling operations use water, but all of the rigs i've worked on switched over to invert (an oil-based drilling mud) once they got past the water table. see table 1 of this pdf (p 14 of the pdf, p 9 of the printout), which compares oil-based muds and water-based muds. with OBMs, you couldn't have more than 0.6% water.

    how well does paraffin or diesel block 2.4GHz?

    i admit, i've only burned shovel on rigs in western and northern alberta, and not for a few years, either. perhaps water-based drilling is more popular in other places. i sense a geology/geography lesson impending...?
    the only fun part about it i remember was excavating the flare pits at the start of each hole. and telling greenhorns to get me two joints.
    --
    united states nuclear device terrorist bioweapon encryption cocaine korea syria iran iraq columbia cuba
  34. Why more bandwidth needed? by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mudcam.
    Look for it soon, only $1 a minute in streaming video.
    Written transcript: Black, black, brown, gray, black, brown...

    1. Re:Why more bandwidth needed? by Moonshadow · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cum watch this mud get DRILLED by large, sweaty guys till it begs for mercy! Now live on our webcams 24/7!

      *click here*

  35. Re:Dungeon? (Re:M.U.D.) by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

    Unknown? It's a Bayonet Neill Concelman, British Naval Connector, or Bayonet Nut Connector. Check out this for details.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  36. Re:Tacoma Narrows Bridge by Meefan · · Score: 2, Informative

    You DO know that MW is not mW, right?

    Heh. Big difference between mega and milli.

    --

    ------
    http://cooltech.org
    If it ain't cool, it ain't coolt
  37. Re:nothing new by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

    Project requirements: Fifth power, sixth power, whatever it takes!

  38. Re:Spend less on Fossil Fuels more on Alternatives by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We went to fight in the middle east to raise OPEC's price per barrel because that raises US Oil (the country, not the company) prices per barrel. The whole situation is created by big oil. So I suppose so. But if we were using hydrogen, it would probably be sold to us by the people who now run big oil, and they'd find someone else to get us pushed into a war with.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  39. That's all, huh? by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

    You think that's impressive, wait until they figure out how to send mud over the Internet.

  40. ObBadJoke by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 2

    Well, well, well. That's a very deep subject. [rimshot-cymbal]

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  41. It's not just about oil by rhinoX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Directional and horizontal drilling have been in development for the better part of 20 years. This will be a godsend to them. As it is, the equipment required to transfer control and status data back and forth to the motors is bulky, expensive, and prone to failure.

    Most of you don't realize it, but this type of drilling is used all over the place now for all kinds of things. The largest use other than the oil industry is for drilling underneath things (anything, roads, buildings, ship channels, etc) so that cabling, or really damn near anything requiring a hole in the ground can be laid without destruction to the overlying structure. In the early 90's, my dad participated in a project to raise a half-sunken ship from the bottom of a Danish port. They drilled horizontally under the ground beneath the ship, and ran metal cabling underneath it. The cabling was attached to barges on either side of the ship. They pulled apart and raised it off the ocean floor.

    --
    The copper bosses killed you, Joe. 'I never died', said he.
  42. This technology does NOT use mud. The OLD tech did by thebigmacd · · Score: 3, Informative
    From what I read in the article, the heading for this article is inaccurate. The new technology uses a high speed digital cable embedded in the pipe wall to send data to the surface.
    To quote from the article:
    The key to the new system is a unique non-contacting coupler embedded in connections between 30-foot long sections of drill pipe. The coupler permits data to be sent across the connection and on through a high-speed cable attached to the inner pipe wall.

    For more than 60 years, engineers have struggled with the problem of a drill pipe connection, or "tool joint," that would stand up to the wear and tear of increasingly hostile downhole drilling conditions, yet provide reliable electrical connections every 30 feet over thousands of feet of pipe penetrating deep into some of nature's harshest environments.

    Largely because of the stumbling block, in the mid 1970s developers turned to a technology called "mud pulse telemetry." Mud pulse telemetry foregoes electrical connections and transmits data as pressure pulses through fluid circulated to clean the cuttings out of the wellbore.

    But the excruciatingly slow pace of mud pulse telemetry - 3 to 10 bits per second - often meant that data resolution was so poor that the driller could not make crucial decisions in real time. Often, time-consuming operations would be required to retrieve the downhole data or drilling would have to stop while other procedures were employed to confirm the low-resolution data pulsed to the surface
    Thanx, thebigmacd
  43. Re:Something like 2.4GHz would work a treat by adolf · · Score: 2

    I'll be the first to say that I don't know much about drilling, except that when I turn the faucet on at my parents' house, water comes out. Every now and then, the lights dim briefly when the pump turns on... And that's nowhere near the scale being discussed.

    I don't have any paraffin or diesel here, but if you do, try this quick-and-dirty experiment to measure 2.4GHz RF absorbtion:

    Put a container of it in the microwave. Does it get hot? If so, how does the temperature compare to an equal amount of water in a similar container, in the same spot of the oven, after being nuked for the same amount of time?

    Therein lies a rough answer to your question, though it does a ignore number of possibly important factors, such as reflection and refraction of the signals and probably a slew of others that few people outside the realm of microwave engineering really know about.

    As long as you realize that your findings are based on absorbtion alone, you'll be doing fine. There's probably a proper method to quantify it with, with a proper, capitalized Unit to go along with it, if you feel like being really anal about it.

    Now that I'm thinking about it more:

    If the results turn out to be negative (as in, no substantial heating occurs), it might be interesting to ponder using the metal pipe as a waveguide. Such a transmission system would be incredibly efficient, but would place constraints on the type of joint used, and the length of the pipe segments would have to be precise, corresponding to some factor of the wavelength of the signal in whatever medium ends up filling the pipe.

  44. Re:nothing new by susano_otter · · Score: 2

    I'm actually abysmal at math. Within my own idiom, my thinking is generally clear and consistent, but when it comes to simple calculations... I can get about halfway through, and then I have to wing it. I should have just said "whatever it is, it looks like a lot, so I'm interested". Oh well.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  45. Re:oil companies by srvivn21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The size of the ANWAR they want to drill would be equivalent to the square footage of a single family home in New York City.


    And I'm sure that they are just going to air-lift the drilling equipment, living quarters, monitoring equipment, etc. in, right? No paths need to be made to get there, or to get the oil out.


    Also, it's as desolate as a middle eastern desert.


    Obviously you haven't seen pictures of it or been there yourself. Just because there aren't trees blooming 50 feet in the air doesn't make it desolate. There's this neat (but very fragile) ecology called Tundra. ANWR (Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, not ANWAR) is a Wildlife Refuge for a reason. And that reason is not that is is devoid of life.


    Let's also not forget that Alaska IS much better off because the US owns it, and we do have environmental protections in place. Granted, they aren't perfect, but it's something.


    Define better. More developed. Sure. More westernized. I grant you that. But the native cultures are struggling for survival. These are cultures that have existed far longer than western "civilization".

    Developing (or exploiting, it all depends on how you wish to look at it) ANWR (remember, its first and foremost a Wildlife Refuge, not an oil field) will certainly be beneficial (in the short term) to Alaska's economy. I personally wonder if the benefits are worth the potential harm.

    Yeah, it's offtopic. I'm probably feeding trolls as well. Life is hell.
  46. Re:oil companies by srvivn21 · · Score: 2

    This is true and if they had adapted to their environment as well as we have to ours they would probably have big honking oil drills and car factories too.

    Why is that? They did adapt to their environment, and lived in harmony with it for many millennia. What you are describing is making your environment adapt to you.

    Out of curiosity do you use oil based energy? if So why not stop driving your car of running your air conditioner/heater of fosil fuels or stop ranting till you do.

    Yes I do. Rhetorical question, I know. I use it sparingly though. I drive a small car, commute, use energy efficient appliances, etc. There is a difference between admiring a society's longevity and ability to live in harmony with nature and leaving the comforts I am accustomed to to take that way of life. I appreciate all the work that body builders go through to "get ripped", but I'm not going to expend the effort myself.

    Personally, I wouldn't have classified my statements as ranting. More of a counter-point. Obviously, I'm biased.


    The energy to live in the manner to which we are accustomed must come from somewhere or we must cease living in the manner to which we are accustomed.

    Perhaps my point is that the way that we are accustomed to living is not sustainable long-term. The "native" populations (be it Native Alaskans, Native Americans, Aboriginal Australians, what have you) have shown that their lifestyle is sustainable long term.

    Read into that what you will.