Slashdot Mirror


Small Webcasters get Powerful New Ally

An anonymous reader writes "On, Sunday, October 20, 2002, the RIAA's subsidiary, SoundExchange, was set to introduce draconian new fees on small internet webcasters - fees that were designed to drive those webcasters out of business and preserve the RIAA's monopoly on the distribution of music in North America. One of those small webcasters is the Triangle's classical music station, WCPE - quite possibly the finest classical music station in the world. Now it turns out that WCPE has an 800 lb gorilla in their corner, and he's set his sights on the RIAA."

19 of 354 comments (clear)

  1. Why or Why not by hobbitsage · · Score: 3, Informative

    Really when it comes down to brass tacks ... when the rubber meets the road ... Does it truly mater why he did it? Politics makes strange bedfellows. This is evident. You don't have to like them to have them help your cause. US and Soviet Union in WW2 had the same enemy and worked together. Just need to watch people that you ally with in on situation in case they swig opposite on others that you are for.

  2. Read the article. Darrr... by Viewsonic · · Score: 5, Informative

    It says he stopped it because smaller webcasters said the new 'lower' rates would be worse than the 'higher' ones after a certain amount of time and would drive them out of business. Even the new 'lower' rates were too high for some of them.. So im guessing it'll go from .07 per listener to maybe .01 which would still be too much IMO.. RIAA doesn't deserve squat for free advertising. RIAA should be paying webcasters to play the music.

    1. Re:Read the article. Darrr... by peter_gzowski · · Score: 5, Informative

      Jesse Helms blocked the legislation because the lower rates were still too high for many webcasters. However, these lower rates were not worse for the webcasters than the higher ones. The legislation was to change the rate from 0.07 per listener to some percentage of the webcasters' profits. For most webcasters, about 10%, for more profitable channels, 12%. However good intentioned Mr. Helms' blocking was, it will force webcasters to start paying (retroactively) fees based on the old system. They don't have to start ponying up all the dough quite yet, though, as this Salon article details.

      You are right that the RIAA should be paying the webcasters, just as they do with the regular radio station promoters (that's a whole other problem, though).

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
  3. For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    "In case it gets slashdotted?" The article is hosted on Yahoo News. You can't slashdot yahoo. Yahoo slashdots you.

    The last time someone managed to make a network of hacked computers big enough that they could DDOS yahoo to a crawl, it made the national news. Slashdot isn't going to come near to that.

  4. Re:Huh? by Yobgod+Ababua · · Score: 5, Informative

    I believe that was the infamous legislation which had a last minute 26 page addendum tacked on that changed it from being designed to ease finanical impact on small Webcasters into something deisgned to save a mere handful of the largest small webcasters and leave the others to hang.

    It snuck through the house before people realized it had changed. So blocking it in the Senate actually was acting on the side of the small webcasters.

    Check out the previous news on the subject for more details.

  5. Re:Okay, I give up... by buck09 · · Score: 4, Informative
    http://www.rtp.org/

    It's the cities of Raleigh, Durham and Chapel Hill, and the Research Triangle Park, which is the home of RedHat


    The 7,000-acre Research Triangle Park is the largest research park in the United States, and is home to over 140 organizations. RTP has around 42,000 full- time employees entering the Park each day. Recognized internationally as a center for cutting- edge research and development, the Park is owned and developed by the private, not-for-profit Research Triangle Foundation. The Research Triangle itself is named for the Triangle formed by the three universities: Duke University at Durham, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and North Carolina State University in Raleigh.
    --


    Press any key to continue, any other key to quit.
  6. Jesse Helms to the rescue! by sakeneko · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'd call Senator Jesse Helms at least a 2 ton gorilla myself.... ;>

    It is nice to see that Jesse Helms isn't taking a vacation in his last few months in office. (He's a short-timer -- he retires at teh end of the year.)

  7. Do the math by martissimo · · Score: 5, Informative

    the difference between that "reduced flat rate" and the 70 cents per 1000 listeners per song can really be quite huge (even to very small stations).

    lets say a station reaches 100 people on average and at 4 minutes per track averages 15 songs an hour. that's 360 songs a day, or 131,400 a year... at the other rate of 7 cents per 100 listeners it works out to a fee of $9,198 a year. to someone like this a flat rate of $500 seems like a pretty huge difference... heck this flat rate would come to almost half as much even if you only averaged 10 listeners (500 vs 918).

    too bad the flat rate is only good till congress acts on the pending legislation, because this deal would probably actually be fairly viable for quite a few webcasters

  8. Re: "Dammit, how'd we miss this guy?" by fireproof · · Score: 3, Informative

    They won't have the opportunity to do so. He's retiring at the end of this term, and is about to be replaced in a few months . . .

    --

    /* "A fool does not delight in understanding, but only in revealing his own mind." */

  9. Helms is not running for reelection by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 5, Informative

    Someone mentioned this before, but he got modded to 0 for some reason. Sen Helms is not running for reelection. His term is up in January. There is no "shakedown".

  10. er, no.... by slothdog · · Score: 3, Informative

    say what? Helms blocked the bill which would have *lowered* fees for small webcasters. (Read the article!) The only reason the webcasters got a reprieve is that SoundExchange (the company that collects the royalties) decided to not collect payments until the legislation is passed.

  11. Re:Wow by Rakarra · · Score: 3, Informative
    Jesse Helms? I never would have thought a High Ranking Republican would get involved like this- and on the side of the smaller guy.

    The Republicans are generally not friends with Holleywood and the music industry. The Democrats are traditionally those industries' allies. So while it's just a -tad- bit surprising, it shouldn't come as a complete shock. I never thought I'd see the day though when Jesse Helms would actually fight on the right side of an issue and be anything other than an embarassment of a senator.

  12. Re:Somebody please explain by WEFUNK · · Score: 3, Informative

    If I am an independent musician, can't I just make a deal with a local webcaster at a rate that we negotiate?

    IANAWYNTBTKTFS (I am not a whatever you need to be to know this for sure), but I think you're always free to do this as an independent, or even through your label. The issue here is the mandatory licensing terms which allow broadcasters (and webcasters) to play songs without explicit permission as long as they pay the royalty fees set out in the law. Otherwise, stations would have to negiotiate individually with each and every copyright holder in order to buy permission to play songs. Now I might be somewhat wrong in that stations may need to pay the RIAA no matter what (even if they only play independent music) just because it was the easiest way to set this up in the olden days.

    Similar mechanisms have been proposed to allow anyone to manufacture life saving drugs or use old software patents as long as they pay a set royalty rate. The rates would presumably be higher than what you might be able to get if you negiotiated your own terms and higher than what the original company would normally charge.

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
  13. Re:Okay, I give up... by Moridineas · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Triangle is in North Carolina, consisting of Durham, Raleigh, and Chapel Hill. The Univerisities: Duke, NC State, and UNC-CH. Otherwise known as the Research Park, such companies as RedHat are based here, IBM, Cisco, Nortel and others haev large offices here as well.

  14. Re:What about your own content? by mcubed · · Score: 3, Informative
    A question that I still haven't been able to get answered, is do all these fees apply for streaming your own content - like you talking, your friends garage band music, etc?

    No. Why would it? If you create the content, you are the copyright holder. It would apply to your friend's garage band music only if your friend's garage band is represented by RIAA or ASCAP or similar. Likewise, the fees don't apply to any sound recordings in the public domain, provided the songs recorded are also in the public domain.

    Michael
    --
    "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
  15. Then don't pay by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a stream that plays a three hour loop of the Best of my radio show, so I own the copyright on that and it's all that's on the stream... Why should I pay the RIAA for this?

    You shouldn't. What makes you think you should?

  16. Re:Do people really think $500/yr is onerous? by martissimo · · Score: 3, Informative

    the bill he helped stop was not the 500 dollar fee, the 500 dollar fee is what SoundForge decided to allow until the bill currently blocked in the Senate's situation is resolved.

    The blocked bill which did pass in the House underwent some very radical last minute changes due to negotiations with a small group of webcasters and the RIAA. A bit more info about what actually happened here

  17. Re:What a genuinely interesting dilemma. by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Welcome to the Real World, where nothing is black or white, no one is evil or good and nothing is _ever_ as simple as it seems.

    Nah, that's the "ironic pseduo-post-modern world."

    The real world has quite its share of things that are simple and black/white good/evil. They're just not EVERYTHING, and everything has good parts and evil parts.

    Cases in point: Hitler & The "Tarot Card Sniper" opposed to Mother Theresa or the United Way. (Heck, the UW is a great example--they're a good thing with bad people at some of their hearts.)

    "Those who call the world a thousand shades of grey forget about black and white far too often."

  18. Re:What a genuinely interesting dilemma. by floppy+ears · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mother Theresa: According to this book by Christopher Hitchens, Mother Theresa is "a religious fundamentalist, a political operative, a primitive sermonizer and an accomplice of worldly powers." The business that she created in India has made well over $50 million, exploiting what amounts to slave labor. Perhaps her main worldly goal was to become a saint. Sure, she helped dying people, but should that blind us to what else was going on?

    United Way: In 1995, former United Way President William Aramony was convicted for conspiracy, fraud, and tax crimes related to his stealing from the United Way. See, e.g. this site. Great use of your charity dollars, right? Or a precursor to our corporate accounting scandals of today?

    Now I'm not saying that this is the definitive story on your examples. But is it black and white?

    --

    "If I could live to be several hundred
    I could take a walk and really wander, really wonder."