Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Berman Retreats, But Only To Regroup

Posted by timothy on from the if-not-for-you-pesky-kids dept.

thefinite writes "It looks like the P2P vigilante bill sponsored by Berman is going to have to be rewritten even just to be considered. A ZDNet story talks about the likelihood that the bill will get anywhere as currently written. Hopefully, the second time around will make it clear that the idea is flawed, not just the text."

11 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Regroup to fight terrorists.... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can imagine the wording now "Terrorists could use a P2P network to share information, or to co-ordinate attacks."

    Same shit different spin. I doubt they'll be watering it down, just making it more of a general threat than being specific on copyright.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Regroup to fight terrorists.... by the_other_one · · Score: 5, Funny

      Terrorists could beat out messages on drums and other musical instruments. They could even use this method to co-ordinate attacks.

      Music should be banned.

      This would also solve all our problems with the RIAA.

      --
      134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
  2. This is like... by MCMLXXVI · · Score: 4, Funny

    Saying kids are using illeagal fireworks so we are going to use flamethrowers on the kids to disable the fireworks.

  3. Wait for the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The MPAA and RIAA are creating and marketing a bold, new superhero, The P2P Vigilante

    Press relase: "We hope to educate the youth and public of America about the dangers of P2P file sharing- in the fine tradition of propaganda through the ages, the P2P Vigliante, a young, hip, midriff-baring female superhero will deal out justice and vengance to those who would use a P2P network for evil. Which is everyone who uses a P2P network. It's, like, evil and stuff. Anyway, it's on every Tuesday night at 8 (7 Central) on the WB! Excuse me, I have to go do a few lines of coke."

  4. The real reason is... by LordHunter317 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think the real reason it isn't happening is because Berman learned from here that his Musical Car horn on his nice shiny Cadallic would be outlawed. The new law will probably be ... "All devices which play digital copyrighted stuff must be regulated, except for my musical car horn."

  5. Hey, Mr. Infringer... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...it's "Terrorists(TM)". Get it right, God(C) damnit!

  6. Re:I'm getting cynical. by iplayfast · · Score: 5, Funny

    Even worse. I'm a Canadian, so I am not affected by this stuff....

    NOT!

    The crappy US legislation always seems to find it's way into Canada sooner or later. Worse I can't even vote the people out who are making this stuff up.

    Sometimes it truly is like sleeping next to an Elephant. (with bad gas!)

  7. Re:I'm getting cynical. by Faggot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, Man! This Is Totally A Refreshingly Insightful And Insightfully Refreshing Indictment Of The Practices Of Elected Officials In Modern America!

    Gag me with a taser.

    p.s. iplayfasterthanyou

    --

    But what do I know. I'm just looking for anonymous gay sex.

  8. Re:What what what? by BabyDave · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'd criticise you, but I read the last sentence of the article as
    Hopefully, the second time around will make it clear that the idiot is flawed, not just the text."
    so who am I to judge?
  9. Re:What would get passed? by JordoCrouse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since he admits that in its current form there is no way the bill would be passed, what would have to be changed to be passed?

    He probably had to take out the part that said "constitution, smonstitution...."

    --
    Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
  10. I think it sounds like a lot of fun by Error27 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A Wild West aproach to internet justice would be great.

    Instead of throwing lawsuits around just bring in the programmers and attack the networks with technology. This way if you want to create a network all you need is a few great ideas and some determination... As it is p2p programmers must compete against corporations based on how much they can pay a lawyer.

    Unfortunately, I suspect doubt p2p programmers will not be allowed to automate counter attacks against attackers...

    So basically the idea is crap until that gets changed.

    PS. One idea that's related to this is that we could solve minor disagreements between parties by giant robot battles. This would save millions in tax payer dollars.