Slashdot Mirror


Linux Chosen for IBM's New Supercomputer

Uhh_Duh writes "news.com is reporting that Linux will be the main OS in the Blue Gene - IBM's $100m supercomputer project. The Blue Gene will contain 65,000 processors and 16 trillion bytes of memory." Wow. That's a lot of nuclear weapons simulations.

7 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. Open source IBM by Sacarino · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone else notice this?

    The decision to adopt Linux came, in part, as a result of the growing size and strength of the open-source community. Thousands of developers around the world are participating in the evolution of Linux. Creating a new OS inside of IBM would require a massive engineering effort.

    followed by

    We chose Linux because it's open and....saw considerable advantage in using an operating system supported by the open-source community, so that we can get their input and feedback."

    So, basically, IBM doesn't want to design their own proprietary system (smart) and plans to use the resources currently available. (also smart)

    They want open-source to get them rich, right? Less initial cost by the company, etc etc. What are the odds they'll profit-share with people they're getting rich off of? (well, ok, attempting)

    --
    -- El Sacarino tiene gusto de la chocha
  2. Re:The end of AIX by rseuhs · · Score: 5, Interesting
    All comercial Unices except Solaris are being replaced by Linux, not just AIX.

    In 5 years, there will be only Linux, BSD and Solaris - with BSD and Solaris being binary and source compatible to Linux.

    Linux has reunited Unix, this is a good thing because it didn't happen by monopilzation from one company. There is lot of diversity within Linux (lots of different vendors and supporters) but it's all compatible.

  3. Re:Deep Thought? by N+Monkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Building a computer, to tell you how to build another, larger, more complex computer. Hrmmm..

    Uh, that's how it works in general. Or did you think modern CPUs were laid out by hand?


    Continuing on that theme, it's written (at least next to the Apple 1 and Cray machines at the Science Museum in London) that Seymour Cray used an Apple to design his super computers while Apple used a Cray to simulate one of their designs.

  4. Re:Coming soon: your own 32-way computer on a chip by perky · · Score: 4, Interesting

    errr. I thought this beast had ~65k processors?

    32*64*8*64 = 1048576.

    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  5. Re:Coming soon: your own 32-way computer on a chip by forged · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There is a lot of confusion reported in the articles, probably fueled by the fact that there are or will be soon 2, 4 and even 32 processors per chip.

    The unedited copy/paste from the article goes like this:

    • The computer will use a new architecture that has more than a million CPUs connected in ever-larger bunches, said Ambuj Goyal, vice president of computer science at IBM Research.

      The chip itself will extend an IBM design philosophy that will emerge in coming years with IBM's Power4 processor. That processor will package four CPUs on a single chip, IBM has said.

      Blue Gene will use 32 CPUs in a single chip, Goyal said.

    So, is that a one-million processors machine they're really building, a 32768 chips machine or what ? ZDnet reporters are on crack today :)

    I wish someone found an article from IBM's PR site with more details and less confusion.

  6. Re:Coming soon: your own 32-way computer on a chip by joib · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The one with ~1 million cpu:s is the final Blue Gene. The one which this article talks about with 65000 cpu:s is Blue Gene/L, which is supposed to be a prototype of the final design.

  7. Re:Face it. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    YEAH! :P Heh heh. I admin AIX and it is the best UNIX I have ever worked with. You can do everything from the command line, thru smit, or for the really bad off WSM. SMIT, while it's a CURSES based (Does IBM use NCURSES??) admin tool, you can do almost everything from it. Because you usually buy hardware from IBM, everything just works, or you have diagnostic info to tell you it isn't working including LED codes that tell you why you won't boot (Corrupted BLV, JFS Volume, Bad superblocks....it's all there). In any case, AIX is here to stay and just because IBM chooses to use Linux on their super computer means nothing. It may mean that the government wanted Linux because with THAT many nodes, your AIX support bill would be outrageous! :) That and it maybe the Beowulf stuff just works better then the AIX SP stuff. I wonder if this is using the new Power4 blade servers?

    --

    Gorkman