Slashdot Mirror


DivX DVD Players Arrive

division21 writes "Geeks rejoice -- DivX Enabled DVD Players finally surface! (With all the goodies: MP3, SVCD, etc.) I remember when MP3 compatability appeared back in the day -- And it looks as though DivX Compatibility could be a real possibility for the mainstream ..." And if you can live without the compression, cherrypi points out this surprisingly favorable review of perhaps the cheapest (under $200) portable DVD player with a built-in screen.

25 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. And if they support DivX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Many will also end up supporting Ogg Vorbis, since it's become a popular audio encoding format for DivX's. (Or so I hope.)

    1. Re:And if they support DivX by octalc0de · · Score: 4, Informative

      Many will also end up supporting Ogg Vorbis, since it's become a popular audio encoding format for DivX's. (Or so I hope.)

      Ogg Vorbis isn't really supposed to be used for DivXs. It's a VBR system, when AVIs require a CBR audio compressor, otherwise the video gets really screwed up. Now if there was a way to get ogg to do CBR....

    2. Re:And if they support DivX by puppetman · · Score: 4, Informative

      You better tell all the encoders that. Most new movies are encoded with ogg, and have a .ogm extension. Lower bitrates, better sound, and more room left on the CD(s) to increase your video bitrate.

  2. No thanks. by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This thing costs ~600$ (CDN), and isn't even DivX certified because it doesn't play 3.xx content, which is probably more widely used than 4.xx or 5.xx. I can go to Radio Shack and buy a DVD player for 100$ (CDN), and I know for certain that an MPEG-4 decoder chip does NOT cost 500$!

    When these things cost under 200$ (CDN), and are truely DivX certified, I'll buy one. Until then... I could put together a cheap PC with S-Video out for half this price.

  3. Ambiguous by red_dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shouldn't the article point out that these DivX DVD players aren't the same as the DivX players once sold by Circuit City? Or are they?

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
  4. divx? by carpe_noctem · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought penny-arcade really put it best:

    http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?date=1999-06 -18&res=l#

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  5. Firmware? by Hydro-X · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will the firmware be flashable to update to the latest codecs? I'm sure many have spent time wondering why their movies didn't work before learning that a new DivX codec was released and the newer videos are being encoded with it.

  6. irony... by havaloc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, a DivX player that people will actually want to buy.

  7. Re:Pathetic by Phosphor3k · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, these things dont even support SACDs or DVD-Audio.

  8. If you have an XBox... by NetJunkie · · Score: 5, Informative

    Get a modchip and install the XBox Media Player. It'll stream DiVX/AVI/MPEG/SVCD/VCD from a PC (or off the internal HD) and display on your TV.

    Very nice.

    1. Re:If you have an XBox... by Rew190 · · Score: 5, Informative
      An even easier way to do that is to get a video card that supports tv-out. Nvidia's NView works great for me (I believe that's a pretty standard feature on the new GeForce cards), and if you have a soundcard with a digital coax out cable, you can plug that right into your receiver. I use a WinXP box for this though, so I'm not sure how driver support is on Linux.


      Stupid simple, but divx movies look great on my 27 inch TV. If your computer's near your home entertainment setup, I highly recommend looking into getting the two hooked up.

    2. Re:If you have an XBox... by olrs · · Score: 4, Informative
      I would suggest not doing this until the makers of the XBox Media Player have settled the following issue from http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/:
      Some win32 guys made a media player for Micro$oft's well-known "console", the X-box. Unfortunately they used FFMPEG and XVID sources in their closed-source product, and failed to make their sources - and changes to the used GPL codebase - available either in public, or by request - as the GPL license forces them to do so. They can't be contacted because they don't publish their E-Mail addresses due to an expectable threat from M$, or whatever their reasons are. This violates GPL. As we currently cannot move against them (not that we want to do so, in the first place), we can only warn the open-source community to STAY AWAY FROM THIS PIECE OF PIRATED SOFTWARE! It's a pity that so much people don't give a shit about the tireless work of FFMPEG/XVID creators.

      Just my two cents.
  9. Disc layout? by mobius_stripper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone know what the expected disc layout is?
    Does it pick up any AVI files in the root directory and play them or is there a well defined structure/index file? How are multiple languages, subtitles and menus handled? This info is necessary for standardisation on a uniform DiVX disc format.

    Krishna

    --
    --- I'd love to go out with you, but I have to study for a Turing test.
    1. Re:Disc layout? by puppetman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Good point.

      VSOSub is the standard for subtitles. Will it handle that? Often, the text is tied to the frame that it is supposed to appear in. The file is a .rar. Will this piece of hardware be able to handle it.

      This DivX thing is way too much of a moving target for a piece of engineered hardware to be able hit. Leave it to computers.

  10. How fast will it become obsolete? by puppetman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We went DivX 3.11, 4.0, 5.0, and XVid, etc. This player can play DivX 4.0 and 5.0, but what about 5.03, the upcoming version? Or DivX 6? What about XVid, or old 3.11 movies you have kicking around?

    But video is only a small part of the puzzle. Of the hundred or so DivX "backups" I have, only half have MP3 audio. A big chunk have ogg (and ogg is probably the most popular for new movies), and a few have AC3.

    My point boils down to this: I spend alot of time watching movies encoded in DivX. I even do some encoding. With a PC that is almost infinately upgradable, with all the DivX sites out there offering support, I still have trouble playing some movies.

    Some machine with hard-coded firmware is not going to make the grade.

    If you want to watch DivX on your tv, then get one of these things. That's what I did - it's a stereo, DVD player, and it plays DivX in all it's formats. It sits under the TV, is plugged into the 100 megabit network, and makes life very simple. We don't even have cable any more.

  11. man this is confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    we've got VCD, DVD, DeCSS, MPEG4, Dvix, DVIX, DviX, DviX;-), DviX B-], DviX (_)(_)=D, god knows what else!!

    I bought a DVD player the other day, it was plastered with acronyms. MP3/DVD/CD/VCD/CDR/CDRW.......

    This alphabet soup is pretty damn confusing.

    Look, let's cut to the chase. All I want to do is pirate DVDs and trade them with other people like I do MP3 files. Why do I have to learn all this? When will somebody give me Point&Click piracy tools, like Apple's iTunes?

  12. Seems to me, this is doomed from the start. by NetRanger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As many people have pointed out, the codec is frequently updated. Therefore, many of the to-be-released videos will not play on DVD players that you buy today.

    So why not create a new standard, analogous to the VideoCD format, that incorporates the codec algorithm into the disc headers? Thus all that we need is a universal decoder that will look for the codec in the first sectors of the disc.

    +=o [b]RoboNerd[/b] o=+

    --
    -- We live in a world where lemonade is artificial and soap has real lemon.
  13. Probably not by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    IT kind of depends on how it does the decoding. If it just has a general purpose CPU that is fast enough to handle all the decoing, like a Power PC 750 or something, then it is possable that this could be done since all teh decoding would be software based.

    However I think it is far more likely that this device uses hardware dedicated to the sole purpose of decoing video/audio. Basically the MPEG 2/4 decoding is probably done by a DSP dedicated to that purpose. Well that means that the chip can't do anything but MPEG 2/4 decoding, and cannot be changed.

    It's kinda like a 3d graphics card in your PC. Any modern 3d card is much, much, much faster than any processor you can find. The GeForce 4 can pull around 1 trillon opertaions per second when it really gets cranked up. However, it is a specific DSP, all it does it push pixels, and it can't be reprogrammed to do anything else. Your CPU, while much slower, is general purpose and can be programmed to do theoritically anything.

    Now I don't know for sure what this thing uses, I was unable to access the information on their site, but I suspect it is a couple of dedicated chips to do decoding, not a CPU. In that case, it woul not be updatable. I could be wrong though, CPUs are cheap enough these days in theory they could have a moderatly powerful one (probably on the order of an 900mhz P3 or so) and then just do the decoding in software.

  14. Re:proof by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Go to www.doom9.org and have a look. You need the Ogg Vorbis DirectShow filters to play them and OggMUX to make them. Take DivX video in an AVI files, Vorbis audio in an OGG file and mux them together to produce an OGM container with both. You can even put subtitles in it if you want. Plays great on any Windows system with the OggDS
    filters installed.

    Oh, and VBR audio work just fine in it. The video is VBR, why not the audio?

  15. Your next PC by xigxag · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We've got TiVo type boxes with Hard Drives, and DVD type boxes with DivX...really what we need is a more generalized component-sized PC that works to augment out television viewing experience. I know it's been done before, but the public hadn't caught up with the idea of computational ubiquity. Now's the time for:

    * Component-sized set top box format
    * 20G HD (minimum) for recording shows and user apps
    * Low heat processor (e.g. Transmeta or XScale)
    * A embedded operating system of one kind or another
    * CD-RW/DVD combo drive
    * Video in/out, RJ-45 for connectivity
    * Front port for wired/wireless keyboard/mouse/joystick

    Something like this ought to be doable for less than $500. Advantage: DivX 3.11, Ogg, MAME. whatever you want would be just a download away. Of course, a hacked XBox is already pretty close to this already.

    --
    There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  16. Sticking with a computer by LoudMusic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it's really cool what they're doing with "set-top boxes" (is that he right term). I mean, a stereo unit that plays mp3s from a hard drive, or CD, or even from the network (I own an AudioTron). And these things are going to be REALLY cool ... but exactly who would own them? The people that have DivX files to play on them aren't going to be paying money for hardware to play them. They already have a computer that plays them, and probably an easy way of connecting it to their television set. Mp3 players for stereo units have a bigger market because there simply are more people who can use them.

    In addition to that, there are so many non-standards that are changing so fast that I prefer to just build a good computer to sit in the stereo cabinate and use a wireless keyboard and mouse at the couch. With S-Video and optical audio outputs, I don't really need to worry about secondary hardware because my computer does everything I need. With a network connection to a file server, the geek world needs nothing more.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  17. DivX 3.11 Support by Cyberllama · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I recall when divx first came out and people said there would NEVER be a commercially available stand-alone divx player becuase divx 3 was cobbled together from bits of microsoft code and thus violated their copyrights. Since then it became an open source project and has been rewritten from scracth. Hence, although versions 4 and 5 would be legal, a divx 3 decoding player would not be.

  18. Re:DiVX SOLD OUT. by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only if content producers choose to encode their products with DRM technologies. I don't think many people ripping DVDs for the net would do that, do you?

    N.

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  19. General purpose DSP's abound by xtal · · Score: 4, Informative

    Have a look at the DSP Village over on the Texas Instruments web site. There are whole families of DSP chips that are reprogrammable and accellerate media functionality in all sorts of ways. Even your example of the GF4 - it is specialized towards 3D accelleration, it is customizable with the Cg language extensions. I won't even get into crazier ideas like shipping a FPGA and putting the algorithms on it (the general purpose CPU is probably cheaper). This is the case today, but maybe not tomorrow. This device probably does use some crummy chipset, you're right.

    What people should be asking is why the hell the folks at ATI - who already make exactly what you want, by the way, with their all in wonder cards - can't get their act together and write some decent, bulletproof software for windows 2k or linux (I don't really care at this point, if it's solid software). A general purpose PC with more power than you could ever need for this is about $500 away. Just add the card (maybe with some goodies like support for HDTV) and you're off to the races. Or just get a projector.

    The problem with that right now is stability. That ATI software is not very stable or good, doesn't integrate DiVX and scheduling functionality, doesn't want to work with my satellite reciever, etc. Get some good software in there and you have something.

    My $0.02.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:General purpose DSP's abound by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are correct that newer 3d accelerators like the GeForce 4 and Radeon 9700 are programmable to a degree, but it is a very limited amount of programmability. Basically you can write simple programs that morph the vertexes in a scene and that describe textures ina mathematical sense. That's about it. Still purely graphcs and not general purpose.

      Also note that it is only receantly, within the last year or two, that consumer level graphics cards have gained even this level of programmability. They are finally starting to get a little less specialised and more general purpose, but still are highly, highly specalised devices.

      I predict that we will someday see a crossover, when general purpose CPUs become so powerful and cheap that DSPs will be bsolete. A cheap CPU will be capable of doing anything out could want, and hence there is no reason for a specalised circut.

      However, for now, DSPs are still very common in many devices, and I'd bet this is no exception. While you are correct that a $500 PC could to what they are talking about, that is WAAAY too expensive. I'm betting they are shooting for $300 or less.