Slashdot Mirror
DivX DVD Players Arrive
division21 writes "Geeks rejoice -- DivX Enabled DVD Players finally surface! (With all the goodies: MP3, SVCD, etc.) I remember when MP3 compatability appeared back in the day -- And it looks as though DivX Compatibility could be a real possibility for the mainstream ..." And if you can live without the compression, cherrypi points out this surprisingly favorable review of perhaps the cheapest (under $200) portable DVD player with a built-in screen.
Can they play Ogg Vorbis?
Many will also end up supporting Ogg Vorbis, since it's become a popular audio encoding format for DivX's. (Or so I hope.)
Dig yourself out of your parents basement, shut off your linux b0x, and GO OUTSIDE!!!!
This thing costs ~600$ (CDN), and isn't even DivX certified because it doesn't play 3.xx content, which is probably more widely used than 4.xx or 5.xx. I can go to Radio Shack and buy a DVD player for 100$ (CDN), and I know for certain that an MPEG-4 decoder chip does NOT cost 500$!
When these things cost under 200$ (CDN), and are truely DivX certified, I'll buy one. Until then... I could put together a cheap PC with S-Video out for half this price.
When are we going to get some Ogg Vorbis-enabled DVD/CD Players? With Microsoft getting WMA integrated into DVD players and Xiph putting out Tremor not to mention all the MP3 integration being done, it seems these little companies like Apex would jump to add yet another feature to their players that would differentiate them in that cut-throat bargain basement market.
The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
Posted by timothy on Sunday October 27, @10:07PM ..." And if you can live without the compression, cherrypi points out this surprisingly favorable review of perhaps the cheapest (under $200) portable DVD player with a built-in screen.
from the what-no-ogg dept.
division21 writes "Geeks rejoice -- DivX Enabled DVD Players finally surface! (With all the goodies: MP3, SVCD, etc.) I remember when MP3 compatability appeared back in the day -- And it looks as though DivX Compatibility could be a real possibility for the mainstream
http://www.nitroteam.ptisp.net/chupamos/viewtopi c.php?t=95
Shouldn't the article point out that these DivX DVD players aren't the same as the DivX players once sold by Circuit City? Or are they?
In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
I am glad to see that I can finally get a DVD player that supports DivX. Now I would love to find a PVR that supports the format (come on TiVo).
The dogcow says "Moof!"
It's not $200, it's some number plus "h". Oh and no assembly jokes, this is a dollar amount.
I thought penny-arcade really put it best:
6 -18&res=l#
http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?date=1999-0
"Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
Will the firmware be flashable to update to the latest codecs? I'm sure many have spent time wondering why their movies didn't work before learning that a new DivX codec was released and the newer videos are being encoded with it.
Now I can watch my judy garlend DVDs on my gnu/linux system. :)
Finally, a DivX player that people will actually want to buy.
DivXNetworks, Inc, the company that created the revolutionary patent-pending DivX (TM) video compression technology...
Hmm, I thought that DivX was a perverse concatination of MPEG 4 and MP3. I wasn't aware that it was patentable.
I think, therefore I am an Atheist.
Read more Hereand also Here you have news from JVC and finally Something from Thompson and Zenith
As soon as DVD Burners drop in price it will be illegal movies to the masses :)
i got a dvd player with divx when dvd first came out, what a ripoff...
"Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
and take over my account.
(posting as anonymous cowarad to avoid karma whoring)
what happens when the DivX codec is updated? Can you flash a update for DivX 6 support? Otherwise, im very excited. cant wait for the prices to fall...LIKE RAIN!
adventure-today.com
at USD$390.04 (according to this page) it seems a little steep, but I would buy one. Does anyone know if the price in Euros means I'm going to have to order it from overseas (I live in the US)
This is the MPAA's nightmare-come-true. Divx is soon to be just as mainstream as MP3 (as in my parents will know what it is). Oh well.. Now I can unload all that porn off of my harddrive.
Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
thats like the third time today ive read "news" here that i read elsewhere about a week ago. come on guys, pick up the pace.
Circuit City tried the Divx thing years ago, but it never really took off. Hell, the players were known to be alcoholics.
It doesn't seem to be very useful to me. So what? Now you can download ripped dvd movie encoded in divx, burn it on a cd and play it in this thing on your TV? For the cost of this machine, might as well go out and RENT a couple of dvds and watch it on your existing dvd player, and get better quality.
(posting as anoymous cowarad so as not to be a karma whore) Press Release Source: DivXNetworks KiSS Technology To Release First DivX(TM) Compatible DVD Player Tuesday October 22, 8:30 am ET KiSS DVD Player DP-450 Offers Playback Of Videos Encoded In DivX 4.xx And 5.xx SAN DIEGO, CA and HOERSHOLM, DENMARK--(INTERNET WIRE)--Oct 22, 2002 -- DivXNetworks, Inc, the company that created the revolutionary patent-pending DivX (TM) video compression technology, and KiSS Technology, a leading Scandinavian manufacturer of DVD products throughout the world, today announced that the DP-450 from KiSS Technology is the first DVD player to offer compatibility with certain versions of DivX video technology. ADVERTISEMENT The KiSS DP-450, set for release in late October, will enable playback of videos encoded in DivX versions 4.xx and 5.xx. Additionally, the two companies are working closely together to develop future products that will be "DivX Certified" and offer full compatibility with all versions of DivX video. DivX video compression technology, often called the "MP3 of video," offers 7-10 times greater compression than MPEG-2 technology with no loss in visual quality. Hailed as a "revolutionary product" by Tom's Hardware Guide, DivX has been downloaded over 70 million times worldwide. "Our new progressive Scan DP-450 DVD Player with DivX support is hitting the market exactly at the right time and the right price of 400 Euro. We believe that it is important to offer our users support for DivX video above and beyond other video technologies for a number of reasons," said Bo Lustrup, Marketing Manager at KiSS Technology (www.kiss-technology.com). "The incredible visual quality, significant brand equity, and vast global demand for DivX video makes the technology a must-have for next-generation video electronics devices, and the addition of DivX compatibility to the DP-450 will give our product a significant competitive advantage in the marketplace." "As the first DVD player to support DivX playback, the DP-450 is a significant development for consumers, and we look forward to working with KiSS Technology to ensure full DivX compatibility in future products," said Jordan Greenhall, CEO and co-founder of DivXNetworks (www.divxnetworks.com). "The global DivX community has been anxiously awaiting next-generation devices that support DivX video, and the coming year will see the explosion of DivX technology in the consumer electronics space across a wide range of products." The KiSS DP-450, manufactured and designed in Scandinavia, was designed to provide consumers with the highest-quality picture and sound. In addition to DivX compatibility, the DP-450 offers a groundbreaking progressive scan technology that enhances the visual experience, MPEG-4 support, a unique MP3 playback and user interface and a photo album feature for digital photo collections. The KiSS DP-450 also comes complete with the standard CD/MP3, CD-RW, SVCD, VCD and DVD-RW Playback offered by its predecessor, the award winning DP-330. For more information, visit www.kiss-technology.com. The latest release of DivX video technology is being incorporated in a number of next-generation chip-sets and video convergence devices.DivXNetworks recently launched a DivX Certified Partner Program to ensure the development of official DivX enabled consumer electronics products. For more information, visit www.divx.com/certified. About DivXNetworks DivXNetworks is a leading technology company that enables the rapid proliferation of video content over Internet Protocol (IP) networks by combining the lightweight, ubiquitous access of the Internet with DVD-quality video performance. The company's approach is built upon the success of the DivX(TM) codec, a leading standard for MPEG-4 compatible video distribution with over 70 million users worldwide, and the DivX Open Video System(TM), a next-generation content delivery system that provides unsurpassed aggregation, promotion, and distribution of video content for mass markets. DivXNetworks is headquartered in San Diego, California, with a satellite office in Los Angeles. For more information about DivXNetworks, visit www.divxnetworks.com. About KiSS Technology KiSS Technology A/S was founded in 1994 and has established itself as one of the leading manufacturers of DVD products and DVB-receivers throughout the world. KiSS Technology headquarters is in Hoersholm, Denmark. Most of the staff is located here, but with sales offices in Sweden, Germany and UK. KiSS Technology A/S has four principal activities: DVD solutions, Plasma and TFT Displays, DVB solutions, and distribution of multimedia products. Please visit the company's web site at www.kiss-technology.com Contact: Contact: Tom Huntington Company: For DivXNetworks Title: Corporate Communications Manager Voice: 858-909-5358 Email: thuntington@divxnetworks.com Contact: Bo Lustrup Company: KiSS Technology A/S Voice: +45 45 17 00 80 Email: blu@kiss-technology.com Source: DivXNetworks
(posting as anonymous cowarad to avoid karma whoring)
There is of course a huge problem here. Many people use different audio codecs for their divx files. I've seen a lot of divx files with proprietary audio codecs. So we won't be able to play those files on this device?
now I can play the videos I get off kazaa on a dvd player, it's about time!
GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
Does anyone know whose chip they're using for the video decoder?
KiSS DVD Player DP-450
and on a side note:
2002-10-27 05:10:41 The new Ultimate DVD player (articles,news) (rejected),
no really, i'm not bitter...
Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
Get a modchip and install the XBox Media Player. It'll stream DiVX/AVI/MPEG/SVCD/VCD from a PC (or off the internal HD) and display on your TV.
Very nice.
if somebody would come out with a player that allowed you update the playable codecs by hooking it up to your computer or inserting a preloaded pcmcia card. Open up the plugin architecture and you would probably sell one to every /.er.
Then I wouldn't have to read about all the I wan't (insert favorite codec here) on it but its not available because *they* are out to get me.
-- The morphemes of your disquisition are ascertainable, but they have eschewed an ambit of transpicuous exposition.
3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375 10582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706 79821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081 28481117450284102701938521105559644622948954930381 96442881097566593344612847564823378678316527120190 91456485669234603486104543266482133936072602491412 73724587006606315588174881520920962829254091715364 36789259036001133053054882046652138414695194151160 94330572703657595919530921861173819326117931051185 48074462379962749567351885752724891227938183011949 12983367336244065664308602139494639522473719070217 98609437027705392171762931767523846748184676694051 32000568127145263560827785771342757789609173637178 72146844090122495343014654958537105079227968925892 35420199561121290219608640344181598136297747713099 60518707211349999998372978049951059731732816096318 59502445945534690830264252230825334468503526193118 81710100031378387528865875332083814206171776691473 03598253490428755468731159562863882353787593751957 78185778053217122680661300192787661119590921642019 89380952572010654858632788659361533818279682303019 52035301852968995773622599413891249721775283479131 51557485724245415069595082953311686172785588907509 83817546374649393192550604009277016711390098488240 12858361603563707660104710181942955596198946767837 44944825537977472684710404753464620804668425906949 12933136770289891521047521620569660240580381501935 11253382430035587640247496473263914199272604269922 79678235478163600934172164121992458631503028618297 45557067498385054945885869269956909272107975093029 55321165344987202755960236480665499119881834797753 56636980742654252786255181841757467289097777279380 00816470600161452491921732172147723501414419735685 48161361157352552133475741849468438523323907394143 33454776241686251898356948556209921922218427255025 42568876717904946016534668049886272327917860857843 83827967976681454100953883786360950680064225125205 11739298489608412848862694560424196528502221066118 63067442786220391949450471237137869609563643719172 5 90 09946576407895126946839835259570982582262052248940 77267194782684826014769909026401363944374553050682 03496252451749399651431429809190659250937221696461 51570985838741059788595977297549893016175392846813 82686838689427741559918559252459539594310499725246 80845987273644695848653836736222626099124608051243 88439045124413654976278079771569143599770012961608 94416948685558484063534220722258284886481584560285 06016842739452267467678895252138522549954666727823 98645659611635488623057745649803559363456817432411 25150760694794510965960940252288797108931456691368 67228748940560101503308617928680920874760917824938 58900971490967598526136554978189312978482168299894 87226588048575640142704775551323796414515237462343 64542858444795265867821051141354735739523113427166 10213596953623144295248493718711014576540359027993 44037420073105785390621983874478084784896833214457 13868751943506430218453191048481005370614680674919 27819119793995206141966342875444064374512371819217 99983910159195618146751426912397489409071864942319 61567945208095146550225231603881930142093762137855 95663893778708303906979207734672218256259966150142 15030680384477345492026054146659252014974428507325 18666002132434088190710486331734649651453905796268 56100550810665879699816357473638405257145910289706 41401109712062804390397595156771577004203378699360 07230558763176359421873125147120532928191826186125 86732157919841484882916447060957527069572209175671 16722910981690915280173506712748583222871835209353 96572512108357915136988209144421006751033467110314 12671113699086585163983150197016515116851714376576 18351556508849099898599823873455283316355076479185 35893226185489632132933089857064204675259070915481 41654985946163718027098199430992448895757128289059 23233260972997120844335732654893823911932597463667 30583604142813883032038249037589852437441702913276 56180937734440307074692112019130203303801976211011 00449293215160842444859637669838952286847831235526 6 97 80280731891544110104468232527162010526522721116603 96665573092547110557853763466820653109896526918620 56476931257058635662018558100729360659876486117910 45334885034611365768675324944166803962657978771855 60845529654126654085306143444318586769751456614068 00700237877659134401712749470420562230538994561314 07112700040785473326993908145466464588079727082668 30634328587856983052358089330657574067954571637752 54202114955761581400250126228594130216471550979259 23099079654737612551765675135751782966645477917450 11299614890304639947132962107340437518957359614589 01938971311179042978285647503203198691514028708085 99048010941214722131794764777262241425485454033215 71853061422881375850430633217518297986622371721591 60771669254748738986654949450114654062843366393790 03976926567214638530673609657120918076383271664162 74888800786925602902284721040317211860820419000422 96617119637792133757511495950156604963186294726547 36425230817703675159067350235072835405670403867435 13622224771589150495309844489333096340878076932599 39780541934144737744184263129860809988868741326047 21569516239658645730216315981931951673538129741677 29478672422924654366800980676928238280689964004824 35403701416314965897940924323789690706977942236250 82216889573837986230015937764716512289357860158816 17557829735233446042815126272037343146531977774160 31990665541876397929334419521541341899485444734567 38316249934191318148092777710386387734317720754565 45322077709212019051660962804909263601975988281613 32316663652861932668633606273567630354477628035045 07772355471058595487027908143562401451718062464362 67945612753181340783303362542327839449753824372058 35311477119926063813346776879695970309833913077109 87040859133746414428227726346594704745878477872019 27715280731767907707157213444730605700733492436931 13835049316312840425121925651798069411352801314701 30478164378851852909285452011658393419656213491434 15956258658655705526904965209858033850722426482939 72858478316305777756068887644624824685792603953527 73480304802900587607582510474709164396136267604492 56274204208320856611906254543372131535958450687724 60290161876679524061634252257719542916299193064553 77991403734043287526288896399587947572917464263574 55254079091451357111369410911939325191076020825202 61879853188770584297259167781314969900901921169717 37278476847268608490033770242429165130050051683233 64350389517029893922334517220138128069650117844087 45196012122859937162313017114448464090389064495444 00619869075485160263275052983491874078668088183385 10228334508504860825039302133219715518430635455007 66828294930413776552793975175461395398468339363830 47461199665385815384205685338621867252334028308711 23282789212507712629463229563989898935821167456270 10218356462201349671518819097303811980049734072396 10368540664319395097901906996395524530054505806855 01956730229219139339185680344903982059551002263535 36192041994745538593810234395544959778377902374216 17271117236434354394782218185286240851400666044332 58885698670543154706965747458550332323342107301545 94051655379068662733379958511562578432298827372319 89875714159578111963583300594087306812160287649628 67446047746491599505497374256269010490377819868359 38146574126804925648798556145372347867330390468838 34363465537949864192705638729317487233208376011230 29911367938627089438799362016295154133714248928307 22012690147546684765357616477379467520049075715552 78196536213239264061601363581559074220202031872776 05277219005561484255518792530343513984425322341576 23361064250639049750086562710953591946589751413103 48227693062474353632569160781547818115284366795706 11086153315044521274739245449454236828860613408414 86377670096120715124914043027253860764823634143346 23518975766452164137679690314950191085759844239198 62916421939949072362346468441173940326591840443780 51333894525742399508296591228508555821572503107125 70126683024029295252201187267675622041542051618416 34847565169998116141010029960783869092916030288400 26910414079288621507842451670908700069928212066041 83718065355672525325675328612910424877618258297651 57959847035622262934860034158722980534989650226291 74878820273420922224533985626476691490556284250391 27577102840279980663658254889264880254566101729670 26640765590429099456815065265305371829412703369313 78517860904070866711496558343434769338578171138645 58736781230145876871266034891390956200993936103102 91616152881384379099042317473363948045759314931405 29763475748119356709110137751721008031559024853090 66920376719220332290943346768514221447737939375170 34436619910403375111735471918550464490263655128162 28824462575916333039107225383742182140883508657391 77150968288747826569959957449066175834413752239709 68340800535598491754173818839994469748676265516582 76584835884531427756879002909517028352971634456212 96404352311760066510124120065975585127617858382920 41974844236080071930457618932349229279650198751872 12726750798125547095890455635792122103334669749923 56302549478024901141952123828153091140790738602515 22742995818072471625916685451333123948049470791191 53267343028244186041426363954800044800267049624820 17928964766975831832713142517029692348896276684403 23260927524960357996469256504936818360900323809293 45958897069536534940603402166544375589004563288225 05452556405644824651518754711962184439658253375438 85690941130315095261793780029741207665147939425902 98969594699556576121865619673378623625612521632086 28692221032748892186543648022967807057656151446320 46927906821207388377814233562823608963208068222468 01224826117718589638140918390367367222088832151375 56003727983940041529700287830766709444745601345564 17254370906979396122571429894671543578468788614445 81231459357198492252847160504922124247014121478057 34551050080190869960330276347870810817545011930714 12233908663938339529425786905076431006383519834389 34159613185434754649556978103829309716465143840700 70736041123735998434522516105070270562352660127648 48308407611830130527932054274628654036036745328651 05706587488225698157936789766974220575059683440869 73502014102067235850200724522563265134105592401902 74216248439140359989535394590944070469120914093870 01264560016237428802109276457931065792295524988727 58461012648369998922569596881592056001016552563756 8
87467764657573962413890865832645995813390478027
58213144957685726243344189303968642624341077322
Is it good, or is it whack?
This thing ought to be able to output 1080p. Can it? And is it any good at DVD bitrate?
I was unaware that the Euro and the US Dollar were so close in value. Also, I was more concerned about the domestic availability of this product. I'm sure its not cheap to ship a DVD player.
...are these DivX DVD players or DIVX DVD players? :)
Can't wait for that particular bit of irony to hit the fan(s).
I am writing this letter because I take issue with some of Miss Eugenia "Fat Pig" Loli's expedients. In the text that follows, when I quote from Eugenia, I will use the word "excrement" in place of another word which is now apparently permitted in general circulation publications, and which I have edited out. Her few positive contributions will continue to be overshadowed by her broader message of hate. And if that seems like a modest claim, I disagree. It's the most radical claim of all.
If I recall correctly, she would have us believe that those who disagree with her should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve. Yeah, right. This brings us to the dark underside of Eugenia's prank phone calls, the side that's known to feed information from sources inside the government to organizations with particularly frightful agendas. What conclusion should we draw from Eugenia's imprecations? How about that Eugenia's belief that we ought to worship iconoclastic Philistines as folk heroes is pure and total fantasy? Eugenia refuses to come to terms with reality. She prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination. She managed to convince a bunch of the most coldhearted oafs you'll ever see to help her do everything possible to keep fatuitous, grotesque slaves to fashion combative and psychotic. What was the quid pro quo there? The only clear answer to emerge from the conflicting, contradictory stances that she and her hangers-on take is that it's time to get beyond lies, dissembling, and propaganda deliberately spread by Eugenia and act according to the plain truth. Her invectives are destructive. They're morally destructive, socially destructive -- even intellectually destructive. And, as if that weren't enough, the picture I am presenting need not be confined to her insults. It applies to everything Eugenia says and does.
If you don't think that she confuses entertainment with learning, then think again. Certainly, my purpose here is not to knock some sense into Eugenia. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that Eugenia's foot soldiers tend to fall into the mistaken belief that you and I are morally inferior to disdainful, immoral morons, mainly because they live inside a Eugenia-generated illusion-world and talk only with each other. This is a free country, and I claim we ought to keep it that way. Everybody loves a good game of hide-and-seek: find the person, find the hidden item, or, in Eugenia's case, find the hidden agenda.
Yes, you heard me right; Eugenia would have us believe that society is supposed to be lenient towards quixotic party animals. Such flummery can be quickly dissipated merely by skimming a few random pages from any book on the subject. Contrary to the impression that the worst classes of dishonest slubberdegullions there are offer "new," "innovative," and "advanced" ideas, there is little new in their agendas. I overheard one of her co-conspirators say, "Eugenia acts in the public interest." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to invigorate the effort to reach solutions by increasing the scope of the inquiry, rather than by narrowing or abandoning it. You see, she does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when she says that hanging out with insincere gutless-types is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience, that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins.
If the only way to draw an accurate portrait of Eugenia's ideological alignment is for me to play right into the hands of socially inept doofuses, then so be it. It would honestly be worth it, because her premise (that honor counts for nothing) is her morality disguised as pretended neutrality. Eugenia uses this disguised morality to support her declamations, thereby making her argument self-refuting. Granted, before bothering us with her next batch of whiney, saturnine notions, she should review the rules of writing a persuasive essay, most notably the one about sticking to the topic the writer establishes. But even her legatees are afraid that she will impact public policy for years to come by next weekend. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that Eugenia should clarify her point, so people like you and me can tell what the heck she's talking about. Without clarification, Eugenia's views sound lofty and include some emotionally charged words but don't really seem to make any sense. Her activities have paid off: already, she has had some success in her efforts to make our country spiritually blind. Eugenia's platitudes are continually evolving into more and more unpatriotic incarnations. Here, I'm not just talking about evolution in a simply Darwinist sense; I'm also talking about how Eugenia is completely mistaken if she believes that everything she says is totally and utterly true. Even though she has aired her disapproval of being criticized, I still contend that the point at which you discover that the long-term consequences of Eugenia's pleas are rarely examined, let alone subjected to scientific scrutiny, is not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a determination that she can't attack my ideas, so she attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. Eugenia could make pauperism socially acceptable.
You may be wondering why brainless rabble-rousers latch onto her generalizations. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why the main dissensus between me and Eugenia is that I maintain that it is incumbent upon all of us to confront Eugenia's practices head-on. She, on the other hand, contends that it is not only acceptable, but indeed desirable, to instill a subconscious feeling of guilt in those of us who disagree with her "compromises". Although the proper definition of "nondenominationalism" is hotly disputed, I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why her diatribes are a cancer that gnaws away at the national psyche. My peers suspect that she is begging the question when she says that the sky is falling. While this is indeed true, I insist we must add that she has abandoned ethics altogether. So what's the connection between that and her belief systems? The connection is that Eugenia has written volumes about how laws are meant to be broken. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that she is absolutely determined to believe that some people deserve to feel safe while others do not, and she's not about to let facts or reason get in her way. I can assure you that to believe that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of egocentric stereotypes is to deceive ourselves. For those of you out there who don't know what I'm talking about, let me give you a quick explanation: in this case, the obvious solution is also the correct one. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that if you were to tell her that opposing her jackbooted newsgroup postings actively and earnestly is the moral duty of every good human being, she'd just pull her security blanket a little tighter around herself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world.
I'm not saying this to be malodorous, but rather to explain that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, Eugenia's vassals don't really care that her sense of humor runs the gamut from rude and crude to sordid and unforgiving. But the problems with her quips don't end there. It is important to differentiate between contumelious resentful-types and morally crippled shirkers who, in a variety of ways, have been lured by Eugenia's maladroit positions, or who have ended up wittingly or unwittingly in coalitions with Eugenia's confreres, or who maintain contact with Eugenia as part of serious and legitimate research. It doesn't do us much good to become angry and wave our arms and shout about the evils of her ideals in general terms. If we want other people to agree with us and join forces with us, then we must put an end to her evildoing. It troubles and amazes me to think that she is stepping over the line when she attempts to portray uppity crybabies as calumniators -- way over the line.
No matter what Eugenia thinks, I want to give people more information about Eugenia, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I sincerely hope people draw: Eugenia keeps saying that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. For some reason, Eugenia's peons actually believe this nonsense. The whole premise of her ravings is false, and her arguments are specious at best. Eugenia has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and give rise to obtuse hoodlums -- all by trumping up a phony emergency. There are no two ways about it; if we let her paint people of different races and cultures as rude alien forces undermining the coherent national will, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization.
Eugenia would have us believe that she has been robbed of all she does not possess. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Eugenia is surrounded by myopic, anti-intellectualism-prone jokers who parrot the same nonsense, which is why every time she tells her surrogates that she has a "special" perspective on colonialism which carries with it a "special" right to maintain social control by eliminating rights and freedoms, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question. She maliciously defames and damagingly misrepresents everyone and everything around her. There's a word for that: libel. It is well known that Eugenia should practice what she preaches. But the passage of time will make it clear to even the more slow among us that Eugenia is afraid of change. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper, because it's the news that just doesn't fit.
I am reminded of the quote, "Her argument is invalid." This comment is not as intransigent as it seems, because far too many people tolerate Eugenia's utterances as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that I wonder if Eugenia really believes the things she says. She knows they're not true, doesn't she? This is not a question that we should run away from. Rather, it is something that needs to be addressed quickly and directly, because self-absorbed miscreants, almost by definition, compromise the free and open nature of public discourse. Let me rephrase that: I can surely suggest how Eugenia ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Eugenia herself. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is imperialism. That's self-evident, and even Eugenia would probably agree with me on that. Even so, she has a penchant for counterinsurgency and clandestine operations. And I can say that with a clear conscience, because she has stated that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. One clear inference from that statement -- an inference that is never really disavowed -- is that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. Now that's just crapulous. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that the hostility and boredom Miss Eugenia "Fat Pig" Loli is experiencing internally is quite evident externally.
Multifarious avenues of approach vie for attention as potential retorts to Miss Eugenia "Fat Pig" Loli's overbearing utterances. First off, if Eugenia is victorious in her quest to use every conceivable form of diplomacy, deception, pressure, coercion, bribery, treason, and terror to manipulate everything and everybody, then her crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity. Her undertakings are not witty satire, as Eugenia would have you believe. They're simply the careless ramblings of someone who has no idea or appreciation of what she's mocking. Even when the facts don't fit, she sometimes tries to use them anyway. She still maintains, for instance, that men are spare parts in the social repertoire -- mere optional extras. Eugenia has commented that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as her comment is lacking in common sense.
Her goal is to bathe in splendor while the rest of us go to work in the mines. Am I saying that she controls a secret underground empire? Yes. That the elasticity of her interpretation of the Bible shields Eugenia from having to take a stand for anything morally correct yet politically (spiritually?) unpopular? Maybe. That Eugenia never acts out of motives that might seem credible or even understandable to the rest of humanity? Definitely. Compassion and moral principle are not the main motives for her actions. It is also worthy of note that she talks a lot about fogyism and how wonderful it is. However, she's never actually defined what it means. How can Eugenia argue for something she's never defined? The only clear answer to emerge from the conflicting, contradictory stances that Eugenia and her representatives take is that it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
What I want to document now is that I am decidedly not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that her recommendations are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? Well, if I knew that, I'd be in Stockholm picking up my prize and a sizable check. Eugenia's eccentricity is surpassed only by her vanity. And her vanity is surpassed only by her empty theorizing. (Remember her theory that the Earth is flat?) Eugenia should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory. She likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why the biggest difference between me and Eugenia is that Eugenia wants to take a condescending cheap shot at a person that most narrow-minded blackguards will never be in a position to condescend to. I, on the other hand, want to enable adversaries to meet each other and establish direct personal bonds which contradict the stereotypes they rely upon to power their obscene publicity stunts. Some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that she is attracted to larrikinism like a moth to a candle. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.
I undeniably insist that Eugenia doesn't know the difference between right and wrong. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that we must continue to monitor her hangers-on and expose them as the horny clunks they are. That said, let me continue. Does she think her arguments through, or does she just chug along on her computer writing about whatever trite philosophies happen to suit her needs that day? I ask, because I cannot conceive of any circumstance under which her sophistries could be considered appropriate. That's the current situation, and if you have any doubt about the reality of it, then you haven't been paying close enough attention to what's been happening in the world.
Animalism can be deadly, but Eugenia's epithets are much worse. From a purely technical point of view, Eugenia wants nothing less than to demand special treatment that, in many cases, borders on the ridiculous. Her apparatchiks then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with daft, gin-swilling big-labor bosses who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that Eugenia is trying to prevent me from getting my work done just to prove she can. In fact, I have said that to Eugenia on many occasions, and I will keep on saying it until she stops trying to pull the levers of racialism and oil the gears of Maoism. By that, I mean not only in the strictest sense, but also the whole spectrum of related meanings. I don't know whether or not you've ever been physically present at a public demonstration by Eugenia's subordinates, but let me tell you, they're pretty annoying. Believe you me, this is partly connected with what I wrote earlier concerning revolting loons. And that's why I'm writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to upbraid her for being so filthy. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that she says that heathenism is the key to world peace. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life.
Although the moral absolutist position is well represented by social and political activists and indubitably influences legislators and policy makers, Eugenia's hatchet jobs are grounded in phony acts of kindness. And let me tell you, honor means nothing to Eugenia. Principles mean nothing to Eugenia. All she cares about is how best to force us to adopt rigid social roles that compromise our inner code of ethics. She has a deficiency of real goals. And let us not forget that she wants us to feel sorry for the cruel, rabid televangelists who give me reason to play right into the hands of judgmental vandals. I maintain we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that Eugenia's morals are a mere cavil, a mere scarecrow, one of the last shifts of a desperate and dying cause.
This in mind, I would like to perform noble deeds. While others have also published information about the worst types of prolix self-promoters I've ever seen, if we are to promote peace, prosperity, and quality of life, both here and abroad, then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology, not by the impolitic and morally repugnant ideologies that Eugenia promotes. She insists that everyone with a different set of beliefs from hers is going to get a one-way ticket to Hell. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. I do not wish to evaluate ageism here, though I suspect that when I'm through with Eugenia, she'll think twice before attempting to blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events.
Though many people agree that we must work together against fascism, mandarinism, solipsism, etc., Eugenia has written volumes about how her overgeneralizations are our final line of defense against tyrrany. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that she is bound to have a rude awakening when she finally realizes how few people approve of her intrusive harangues. End of story. Actually, I should add that I recently informed her that her janissaries fan the flames of unilateralism into a planet-spanning inferno. Eugenia said she'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further; after all, if we let Eugenia restructure the social, political, and economic relationships throughout the entire society, then greed, corruption, and egotism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock and trade of the media and educational institutions. As everyone knows, the agenda that Eugenia is attempting to advance is one of narcissism, repression, and anarchism. What you might not know, however, is that she masterminded last year's now-infamous attempt to use antidisestablishmentarianism as a more destructive form of despotism, and everyone with half a brain understands that.
If you agree, read on. Does she remember the hurt and hate in the eyes of the people she made fun of just so others would like her more? Even if she does, I'm sure she doesn't care, because many people are shocked when I tell them that another piece of supporting evidence is that she is totally unmovable by truth or reason. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, had thought everybody already knew that you, of course, now need some hard evidence that her long-term stratagems of infiltration and mass propaganda have been so successful that Eugenia can now make excessive use of foul language. Well, how about this for evidence: It doesn't do us much good to become angry and wave our arms and shout about the evils of Eugenia's tricks in general terms. If we want other people to agree with us and join forces with us, then we must restore the world back to its original balance. Take, as an example, the way that Eugenia wants to cure the evil of discrimination with more discrimination. Well, even if one is opposed to disgusting, nerdy classism (and I myself am), then surely, we can never return to the past. And if we are ever to move forward to the future, we definitely have to free people from the fetters of alarmism's poisonous embrace while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear. I have given this issue a great deal of thought, and I now have a strong conviction that it is better to be a little old-fashioned, but honest and loyal, than enlightened and modern, but delusional and disingenuous. And I can say that with a clear conscience, because if you're interested in the finagling, double-dealing, chicanery, cheating, cajolery, cunning, rascality, and abject villainy by which she may make us dependent on beer-guzzling ingrates for political representation, economic support, social position, and psychological approval in the coming days, then you'll want to consider the following very carefully. You'll especially want to consider that Eugenia's perorations have a distinctly whiney tone. If you don't believe me, see for yourself.
I, for one, can indisputably suggest how Eugenia ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Eugenia herself. I will never give up. I will never stop trying. And I will use every avenue possible to bring meaning, direction, and purpose into our lives. In closing, we must work together to stop this insanity. Together, we can make a difference. Forever and always.
Nobody gives a flying poop how much anything is in terms of your stupid canada bucks. Any currency that is backed by Macintosh Toffee and Beaver Pelts can't be taken seriously.
Yet another story on Slashdot supporting products which are used for piracy! Yay for freedom (to steal!)
Why don't they just start posting ISOs on the front page?
"when MP3 compatability appeared"
Fanny. "Compatability" dues net appeor en tho dectiunari. I wander why...
that these babies will come with somesort of firmware upgrade that will enable them to play any codec that can be downloaded. I've been waiting for this since a long time!!! Hmmm... now lets see if I can find a 500 CD changer and a 60" plasma TV :)
Does anyone know what the expected disc layout is?
Does it pick up any AVI files in the root directory and play them or is there a well defined structure/index file? How are multiple languages, subtitles and menus handled? This info is necessary for standardisation on a uniform DiVX disc format.
Krishna
--- I'd love to go out with you, but I have to study for a Turing test.
I just rip and make the divx myself.
now i can watch divx rips on ma 80cm tv without luggin around my computer or waiting 18 years for it to decode and burn onto a cd!! ;P
We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
But what about support for DIV3, the Microsoft hack? I would have to bet that most downloaded content is compressed with this codec, although Xvid is gaining popularity. I know that these players are going to get the most use from playing downloaded content. Some people will record tv shows and compress them. Someone is going to have to find a way to convert div3 to iso mpeg4. This can already be done by transcoding, but it would be really cool if it could be done losslessly. How far away is Microsoft Mpeg4 from iso mpeg 4?
While the player seems to support divx 3.11, 4 and 5 (of which only 3.11 is widely used), it doesn't seem to support xvid. Xvid is a rather new codec and a growing portion of movies are released in xvid. In maybe a year practically all new releases will be xvid, and these players won't play them.
Another point is, I wonder how long it takes for MSFT to come after these manufacturers. Divx is a hacked codec based on proprietary tech and I believe MSFT owns the IP rights.
We went DivX 3.11, 4.0, 5.0, and XVid, etc. This player can play DivX 4.0 and 5.0, but what about 5.03, the upcoming version? Or DivX 6? What about XVid, or old 3.11 movies you have kicking around?
But video is only a small part of the puzzle. Of the hundred or so DivX "backups" I have, only half have MP3 audio. A big chunk have ogg (and ogg is probably the most popular for new movies), and a few have AC3.
My point boils down to this: I spend alot of time watching movies encoded in DivX. I even do some encoding. With a PC that is almost infinately upgradable, with all the DivX sites out there offering support, I still have trouble playing some movies.
Some machine with hard-coded firmware is not going to make the grade.
If you want to watch DivX on your tv, then get one of these things. That's what I did - it's a stereo, DVD player, and it plays DivX in all it's formats. It sits under the TV, is plugged into the 100 megabit network, and makes life very simple. We don't even have cable any more.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Seems to me, that at the prices people are willing to pay for these things, some pretty good new computer-screens could be bought. That's my way of watching DVDs and DivX movies - I simply use my good old trusty computer.
;-)
I know there are a lot of tech-geeks who are sooo excited about this, but I simply cannot se the charm OR the advantages over:
1. A cheap, LOW NOISE computer with video-out, that can easily fit behind or besides your tv.
2. A VERY big flat-screen for you computer so that you can simply use that as a substitute.
Well... I guess I am biased in a way since I have my computer near my couch, and linked to both my 5.1 sound system and my stereo... Uhh... and... by the way (I think no one beat me to it): Imagine a Beo... naahh... nevermind
- Tha LamerBunny...
does anyone know of a player that supports the Intel indeo video codecs under Mac OS X? Quicktime will do it in Mac OS 9, but nothing for OS X. Videolan is great with DiVX (better than Quicktime I might add) but we really need Mplayer for OS X. Come on h4x0rz, don't let me down!
yes!
Divx3,4,5 for various reasons including lower quality and copyright issues, most serious mpeg4 encoding is migrating to xvid. Once some Ogg issues get worked out most mpeg4 encoding will be done in Ogg/Xvid. Will this player support those codecs or just be a hundred dollar piece of obsolete junk?
I guess Valenti will be revising his anti-VCR speech from decades ago to attack this.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Guys...is it so hard to spelling logging. Shit, I know the "editorial" crew can't spell things like its, you're, and their, but logging? that's a computer word, for fuck's sake.
you lazy jerkoffs don't deserve to be called programmers, let alone editors. I hope VA is paying you in stock options.R
we've got VCD, DVD, DeCSS, MPEG4, Dvix, DVIX, DviX, DviX;-), DviX B-], DviX (_)(_)=D, god knows what else!!
I bought a DVD player the other day, it was plastered with acronyms. MP3/DVD/CD/VCD/CDR/CDRW.......
This alphabet soup is pretty damn confusing.
Look, let's cut to the chase. All I want to do is pirate DVDs and trade them with other people like I do MP3 files. Why do I have to learn all this? When will somebody give me Point&Click piracy tools, like Apple's iTunes?
A lot of people seem to be concerned about if these divx enabled dvd players are codec-updateable when a new version of divx codec is released. Frankly as long as people follow standards there shouldn't be any problem.
The thing with mpeg-standards (divx is a subset of mpeg-4) is that they do not specify encoders, only decoders. That means that as long as a video stream is decodable by a standard decoder it is valid. Since mpeg compression relies hevily on the deficiencies in our visual systems it is really the tricks employed at encoder level that make the difference in quality (ie. discarding redundant information).
I've gotten the impression that divx has just gotten more standards compliant with every increment version and has picked up some useful tricks for greating a better bitrate/quality ratio. As long as they stick to mpeg-4 compliance and the decoder chips are also standards compliant there shouldn't be any problems with future versions of the divx codec.
But then if people dont follow whatever standards you're talking about, it doesnt matter. Anyone else unnable to play many recent movies encoded in 5.02 because the latest linux release is still 5.01?
-- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
Yeh.. but like I said. Divx is a subset of mpeg-4 standard. For every increment version they seem to get more compliant. They might have upgraded their encoders and decoders together and implemented some mpeg-4 feature that was not in 5.01. That doesn't mean they're not standards compliant but that they might be even more so. The key here is that a decoder needs to be as compliant as possible.
I've yet to come across an ogg file itself much less a divx with ogg audio. Where are these new movies coming from?
Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
That's the melodious wails of Jack Valenti screaming bloody murder. Oh wait a second, he did that the moment smart geeks discovered TMPGEnc and similar tools for making high quality VCDs out of DivXs to watch on their DVD players.....
How can I tell what version a file is encoded in?
DivX is dead, long live DivX!
I'll be impressed when all the codecs can be quietly streamed from a burned disc to the player, the player accepts the codec, and plays the disc with the codec provided.
If only companies like Apex set a few standards on how the 'handshake' of codecs will be initiated.
----------------------
I sig, therefore I was.
Here's my worst case scenario: The MPAA convince$ Justice that this technology allows users to circumvent copyright-protection. Justice tells Customs to stop and seize all shipments of incoming DivX;) DVD players. Justice subpoenas list of customers having purchased units from retailers & credit card companies. Jack-booted thugs break into your home (a la Elian Gonzales), wave M-16's at your family, and seize contraband DVD player.
You exhaust your life savings on legal fees to to fight off federal prosecutors.
You lose your house, your car, your job - your wife leaves you and takes the kids.
Years pass....
Large chunks of the DMCA are finally declared unconstitutional - but unfortunately you died of hypthermia three months earlier, while sleeping in a cardboard box.
The end.
Time to warm up those burner, cause I'm going to pirate and sell every copied movie I can!
- - - - - Fear not the reaper, but my shiny white teeth.
If they stuck with standards like ISMA MPEG-4 instead of hacks like DivX, devices wouldn't become obsolete as quickly.
.mp4 container, while DivX is MPEG-4 video and MP3 audio in an AVI container.)
(Before someone whines, DivX is not standard MPEG-4. The standard specifies MPEG-4 video and AAC audio in a
DIVX SOLD OUT TO MPAA.
DRM will be embedded within DiVX. It's pointless now.
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/04/04/224621 9&mode=nested&tid=126
and
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-875988.html
k.
--even a broken watch is correct twice a day.
Sorry to break this to you, but regular DVD format (mpeg-2) also uses compression
YA BIG STUPID HEAD!
What the hell are you talking about? A random sampling of NFOs on iSONews shows quite a few releases using VBR MP3 soundtracks.
Why on earth would AVIs require a CBR audio stream? Where did you get this idea? I'm really, really curious, here.
--grendel drago
Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
"DivX DVD Players Arrive"
I thought Slashdot had gone back in time a few years heh.
I wonder if that'll spark a trademark dispute...
If the code is all new, why not use a new codec name?
It already is a new codec name; "DivX 5" isn't the same codec as "DivX 3.11". "RealAudio G2" isn't the same codec as "RealAudio". "MPEG audio layer 3" isn't the same codec as "MPEG audio layer 2".
Will I retire or break 10K?
Steve
See ya!
Oh yeah, - Buy a Mac!
On a side note, the MPAA just had a collective heart attack.
Try using MPlayer with the included FFMPEG decoder (the default codecs.conf is probably fine). I haven't had trouble playing any videos recently.
I have MPlayer 0.90 pre 8 running on my iBook under OS X 10.2.1.
OK, I am a video encoding newb and that completely kills everything that I have read and reasoned about DivX. Would anyone care to elaborate?
.Is there any relation at all between DivX and the Circuit City DIVX?
As I understood it, DivX uses the *avi file format* which was developed my Microsoft and is simply a method of packaging the video and audio streams.
As it was explained to me, any audio any video stream (whether it be mp3, ogg or mpeg1 or mpeg2, etc) can be packaged into the avi file format and the fact that it is an avi does not imply a specific audio or video encoding (like choosing paper or plastic at the grocery store -- neither imply what is in the bags).
In this case, I thought the actual video and audio codecs they developed by the DivX people where as only the avi file format was Microsoft's and that DivX 5 was mpeg4.
Since we're on the topic and how I thought it all worked has been thrown to the wind, I might as well ask the question (which I may now have the wrong impression to also). .
Anyone care to elaborate for this now confused soul?
I know most people think of DiVX/XVid/MPEG4 as a tool to pass video around on the net at (relatively) low-bandwidth rates. But what I want to see is a standalone player that will support HDTV-level resolution. I have an HDTV capture card (or two) that I use to record broadcast HDTV as well as PPV, HBO and Showtime shows in high-def. I want to make DiVX DVDs of this high-def material - I want at least an hour of 1280x720 or 1920x1080i (really 1080p @ 24fps, which is just about the same as 1080i) on one DVD-R that I can play without having to use my computer.
If you haven't seen LoTR in high-def, you are missing out. Word is the new director's cut is going to be PPV once the DVDs are out. For a $5 PPV, that's way better picture quality than anything commercially available on DVD.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
What's the difference? Aren't they just filesystem layouts? Why would one be more suited to streaming playback than the other? Isn't the difference like FAT vs ext2---the actual file data stored is exactly the same?
--grendel drago
Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
What can you buy with DivX? DVD's sure don't use DivX, and the only people who really use it are either pirates or enthusiasts, and according to the MPAA, enthusiats are pirates, too.
As many people have pointed out, the codec is frequently updated. Therefore, many of the to-be-released videos will not play on DVD players that you buy today.
So why not create a new standard, analogous to the VideoCD format, that incorporates the codec algorithm into the disc headers? Thus all that we need is a universal decoder that will look for the codec in the first sectors of the disc.
+=o [b]RoboNerd[/b] o=+
-- We live in a world where lemonade is artificial and soap has real lemon.
Will it support DivX 3.11 (the hacked Microsoft codec)? This is the format the majority of my movies are encoded in.
Will it support XviD? This is the codec I use now.
Will it play DivX movies on DVD-R? I might eventually get a DVD burner - when the prices start to fall a bit more.
Will a multi-disc version be released with some type of changer mechanism? Many of my DivX movies are 2-CD, a few are 3-CD. Getting up to change discs *sucks*.
Will it be inexpensive enough that I can convince my friends/family who don't have a computer hooked up to their TV to buy one?
Will it have basic networking capabilites to play DivX movies and MP3s from a Samba server?
My guess is, being a first generation product, much like the first generation MP3 players that came before it, it will simply pave the way for better, more capable DivX players.
IT kind of depends on how it does the decoding. If it just has a general purpose CPU that is fast enough to handle all the decoing, like a Power PC 750 or something, then it is possable that this could be done since all teh decoding would be software based.
However I think it is far more likely that this device uses hardware dedicated to the sole purpose of decoing video/audio. Basically the MPEG 2/4 decoding is probably done by a DSP dedicated to that purpose. Well that means that the chip can't do anything but MPEG 2/4 decoding, and cannot be changed.
It's kinda like a 3d graphics card in your PC. Any modern 3d card is much, much, much faster than any processor you can find. The GeForce 4 can pull around 1 trillon opertaions per second when it really gets cranked up. However, it is a specific DSP, all it does it push pixels, and it can't be reprogrammed to do anything else. Your CPU, while much slower, is general purpose and can be programmed to do theoritically anything.
Now I don't know for sure what this thing uses, I was unable to access the information on their site, but I suspect it is a couple of dedicated chips to do decoding, not a CPU. In that case, it woul not be updatable. I could be wrong though, CPUs are cheap enough these days in theory they could have a moderatly powerful one (probably on the order of an 900mhz P3 or so) and then just do the decoding in software.
DivX 3.11 wan't legit. They didn't program anything to make it, all they did was hack the Microsoft MPEG-4 v3 codec to make it work with AVI files. So there would be a mess of liscencing issues since it's MS's stuff, not the DivX's team's stuff. Also, the MS MPEG4v3 codec really isn't MPEG-4 compliant (it's proprietary, huge suprise there) so an MPEG-4 deocder can't deal with it.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
What about divx's recorded using ogg vorbis sound...
.ogm's as far well as .avi's. The last few divx movies i have encoded have been ogm.. not only is the sound Way better, but the quality is really incredible. This would be a Huge factor in me buying on of these things.. Since every divx i make from now on i will try to make ogm, and the thing would really be obsolete without that for me :(
It would be a real blessing if the thing handled
Americans are stupid. And we'll burn this place to the ground than ever see them on it.
We've got TiVo type boxes with Hard Drives, and DVD type boxes with DivX...really what we need is a more generalized component-sized PC that works to augment out television viewing experience. I know it's been done before, but the public hadn't caught up with the idea of computational ubiquity. Now's the time for:
* Component-sized set top box format
* 20G HD (minimum) for recording shows and user apps
* Low heat processor (e.g. Transmeta or XScale)
* A embedded operating system of one kind or another
* CD-RW/DVD combo drive
* Video in/out, RJ-45 for connectivity
* Front port for wired/wireless keyboard/mouse/joystick
Something like this ought to be doable for less than $500. Advantage: DivX 3.11, Ogg, MAME. whatever you want would be just a download away. Of course, a hacked XBox is already pretty close to this already.
There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
"DivX 3.11" or "DivX ;-)" is not MPEG-4 but MS-MPEG4 (from our friends at Redmond) thus an MPEG-4 chip can't decode a such stream.
I think it's really cool what they're doing with "set-top boxes" (is that he right term). I mean, a stereo unit that plays mp3s from a hard drive, or CD, or even from the network (I own an AudioTron). And these things are going to be REALLY cool ... but exactly who would own them? The people that have DivX files to play on them aren't going to be paying money for hardware to play them. They already have a computer that plays them, and probably an easy way of connecting it to their television set. Mp3 players for stereo units have a bigger market because there simply are more people who can use them.
In addition to that, there are so many non-standards that are changing so fast that I prefer to just build a good computer to sit in the stereo cabinate and use a wireless keyboard and mouse at the couch. With S-Video and optical audio outputs, I don't really need to worry about secondary hardware because my computer does everything I need. With a network connection to a file server, the geek world needs nothing more.
No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
From what little I can gather, that portable seems to be a shinco OEM. My guess is it's probably the Dvd-960 model which has been sold by RCA for around 400 dollars in the states for some time (I think it can be had for as little as 300 now though). I own one of these units and I must say it's quite impressive for the price, ESPECIALLY if you're into downloading anime (fansubbed and unlicensed of course, nothing illegal) and you'd like to watch it away from your computer. I actually bought mine JUST for vcds/svcds and consider the DVD capabillity to be a bonus. Just don't buy it for the mp3 playback, it bites (all songs start about 4-5 seconds into it, no idea why it skips first few seconds, and the on-screen display only shows 8.3 filenames).
Of course, if you design a special pared-down motherboard for it, the costs would go down further. It could be tiny, because it wouldn't have to really do much--so it could fit into a simple DVD-player-sized case. My question is: why aren't computer distributors falling over themselves to make these? A chip that can do DVD/DivX/Xvid/Ogg/APE decoding in software can be had for about $20. Special hardware decoding solutions will just seem moot at this price, given the usability limitations they impose.
I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I recall when divx first came out and people said there would NEVER be a commercially available stand-alone divx player becuase divx 3 was cobbled together from bits of microsoft code and thus violated their copyrights. Since then it became an open source project and has been rewritten from scracth. Hence, although versions 4 and 5 would be legal, a divx 3 decoding player would not be.
As soon as the sixty dollar mainland Chinese version comes out I'm buying one! This is definitely the toy of joy. The inevitable cheap verstions of stuff like this will screw up so many business plans where the primary focus is on controlling the user's media experience in specific place based scenarios. But hey, that's business, if you can't see the competition coming you're gonna get hit.
This is what I call Casey Jones technology. It aint got nothing to lose and it's heading for a bump.
Dedicated hardware is great... but sometimes you can do things yourself aswell.
I was lucky enough to get my hands on a broken Compaq Evo N160 with a broken screen (read: destroyed). Otherwise it was fine.
The bottom line: now I have a DVD/DivX/MP3/Anything player. And it's compact too. A laptop is even surprisingly cool looking without a screen.
PS. If you have a crappy TV like I do and it doesn't understand S-Video (you get a black and white picture), take a look here.
.: Max Romantschuk
Have a look at the DSP Village over on the Texas Instruments web site. There are whole families of DSP chips that are reprogrammable and accellerate media functionality in all sorts of ways. Even your example of the GF4 - it is specialized towards 3D accelleration, it is customizable with the Cg language extensions. I won't even get into crazier ideas like shipping a FPGA and putting the algorithms on it (the general purpose CPU is probably cheaper). This is the case today, but maybe not tomorrow. This device probably does use some crummy chipset, you're right.
What people should be asking is why the hell the folks at ATI - who already make exactly what you want, by the way, with their all in wonder cards - can't get their act together and write some decent, bulletproof software for windows 2k or linux (I don't really care at this point, if it's solid software). A general purpose PC with more power than you could ever need for this is about $500 away. Just add the card (maybe with some goodies like support for HDTV) and you're off to the races. Or just get a projector.
The problem with that right now is stability. That ATI software is not very stable or good, doesn't integrate DiVX and scheduling functionality, doesn't want to work with my satellite reciever, etc. Get some good software in there and you have something.
My $0.02.
..don't panic
If they dont want to put in a flashable codec chip/ have the codec on the disc, why not make an "expansion" slot [pcmcia/cartridge/etc] that has the codec chips on them. That way you can update the chip whenever the "standard" changes...
of course the manufacturers may not want to implement this since they wont be able to have "built in obselecense" [or sell a new version with the new chip for $$$$$$]
--
Time is on my side
I see a problem with these devices - they don't support DivX 3.11 and never will.
Incase you don't know, DivX 3.11 is kinda illegal beacause it uses a hacked version if MS's MPEG codec (or something like that) so incorporation of it would come under the legal finger of MS.
Why have DivX 3.11? It's arguably the best DivX codec because of compatability, size of files and the fact that it's free with no random software installed with it.
That device is just a DivX _player_ .
In fact, there's even no standalone DivX recorder on the market yet. Neither can you buy DivX movies on CD's anywhere.
So, a DivX player is only useful for people who have a computer, a CD burner, and a collection of movies stolen through P2P networks.
Because people bought a computer, they think that they can get everything for free. Free software is one thing, but movies are another thing. Making a movie costs a lot of money. I don't understand why just because someone wastes $500 in a computer and $30/mo in connectivity, he must be granted the right to freely copy an unlimited number of movies. He's not. The right to see movies is the same for everybody. Computer owners are not a special privileged class of people. Devices like DivX players just make people think that sharing DivX has nothing to do with piracy. That's bad.
Also [paranoid mode on] as buyers are likely to have an illegal collection of movies, if you ever buy those standalone DivX players, don't pay by check nor CC.
{{.sig}}
Hey, you little overzealous weirdo. You might want to check out those English schools so you can learn how to spell ridiculous. You and your little microcosm specific view on life are obnoxious, stupid and largely irrelevant. Nothing you say here is general case. It is unilaterally centric to you. You are the most self centered ignorant sheltered person and you perpetuate garbage here. Your posts are a testament to your moronic self centric view on the world, you talk about everything in reference to Canada, Québec, Canadian dollars - you name it. It is annoying. Please review what you post here before posting it for you own sake. Anyone with a brain has a field day laughing at the detritus and cruft you leave behind. And one can tell beyond a doubt you are not technical in any serious way or programmatically inclined. Most likely you are living at home with your parents, or a subsidized existence, you like cheap things over good things because you can not afford good things; you are a gamer and a user. You are neither a progenitor of new and useful code nor a creator of useful things. You are on the bottom rung to the computing public and it is painfully apparent.
1) mp4 format
2) ogm format
3) pray MS never fixes the AVI bug that causes VBR mp3s to accidentally work in the first place.
Kjella
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
Thus far, MS has left DivX 3.1 stuff and the like alone, probably because it's all been not-for-profit things and because they have more advanced codecs (WM8 and now WM9). Doesn't mean it's legal to use DivX 3.11, just that they aren't enforcing it.
I've got more and more respect for Krakow's reviews. They seem very honest, and answer the questions most people would have. And, the variety of products covered convinces me that he is a journalist; not a propagandist working for MS.
Even so, I'm not sure I'd want to run into him in a dark alley behind this WalMart he frequents...
The Kiss DP-450 at least, is using the same chip as the Sigma plug-in card (EM 8500). It supports "Simple Profile", but only partially supports "Advanced Simple Profile" (hey, I didn't make those names). B-frames are among the supported features, QPEL and GMC (as featured in DivX 5.x) is NOT, unless they've managed to do some miracle partial software emulation. Despite their claims of full Divx4/5 support, I don't believe it till I see it, as it's either CPU or chip, not both.
Eother way, don't expect DivX3.11 to work. It's not MPEG4 compliant (neither is DivX4 I think, but so close that it's no problem supporting it). Xvid will work in its *current* state. When they add QPEL/GMC, it wlll no longer work.
The chip has *some* mpeg-4 complience. But I'll wait for a full-featured one that won't be obsolete so quickly.
Kjella
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
I am saying that Guspaz is a butt fucking anus licker fucker of ass.I am saying that Guspaz is a butt fucking anus licker fucker of ass.I am saying that Guspaz is a butt fucking anus licker fucker of ass.I am saying that Guspaz is a butt fucking anus licker fucker of ass.I am saying that Guspaz is a butt fucking anus licker fucker of ass.I am saying that Guspaz is a butt fucking anus licker fucker of ass.
VCDs and SVCDs are a tightly made standard with
specific multiplexing, bitrate, resolution,
framerate etc.
What is "divx" compatibility? Are we talking
about
bitrate, codec (audio/video), VBR/CBR etc?
A computer is flexible enough to handle any
weird format you try, but a set-top device needs
standards. I would really prefer an "MPEG-4"
standard that would specify (similarly to VCDs)
a file format, an audio encoding algorithm
(I believe AAC was formally proposed...) a
resolution etc. That way you know what you
are getting and you know that it WILL work
on another player and give the same results.
As a matter of fact. An MPEG-4 standard wouldn't
even have to be tied to DIVX and should be able
to reproduce all MPEG-4 video streams (XVID etc)
from compatible encoders.
That is the way to go. Using ad-hoc standards will
not help adoption and will certainly not ensure
future compatibility.
P.
There is a chip available. Check out Cyclone
:-)
It costs in the region of $15 to $40 in quantity depending on type and is completely reprogrammable. I've just been to see a demo of this chip (+ others) and it looks ideal for codec implementations. You can program it to be a processor if you want with complete control over the instruction set. These means you can build in such things as hardware complex multiplications, vector processors etc. if you want.
Watch out for this chip, it (and its big brother Stratix) will be many products in the future (certainly the ones I will be developing anyway
wot no sig
If Microsoft ever decides to fix their AVI decoding, all VBR audio tracks will lose synchronization. And any system that actually uses a standards compliant decoder (My guess would be Macs, Linux, stand-alone players) does not and will never have synch either, unless they choose to implement the same bug just to keep compatibility.
Kjella
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
It's using Sigma's EM8500 chip (same as in their add-on card). It will work with:
Current Xvid
DivX 4.x
CBR mp3 tracks
It will not work with:
DivX 3.11 (not mpeg4-compliant)
DivX 5.x with GMC or QPEL enabled (no support in chip)
VBR mp3 tracks (unless they've duplicated the windows BUG which allows it in the first place)
Ogg audio tracks (no support at all)
And for the future:
Won't work with future Xvid releases (no GMC/QPEL support)
But hey, if you need an expensive paperweight, please do.
Kjella
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
Can you do recharge in and take it on the airplane for less than $200?
The truth shall set you free!
Considering some current DVD players have flashable firmware, whats the chance of us just changing that, to give DivX support for even less $$?
Or chipping a used PS2 or somethin?
---- Booth was a patriot ----
Now if only they'd ship at least ONE DVD player with an old-school coax input. I think it's absurd that I have to buy a new television (or an adapter more expensive than a low-end APEX player) just to watch DVDs on it.
I'm not claiming there's a huge market for it, but it's got to be significant, and it can't cost that much to add.
Seen any BadMarketing lately?
DivX on CDs is a great way to record and distribute home video. My parents want to see their grandkid. I have a camcorder. Trouble is, they live halfway around the planet. It's easy to duplicate and mail DivX video on CDs, and it would be great if my not-all-computer-savvy relatives owned DVD players that happened to play DivX.
Yes, you are clueless. A divx with audio sync probs due to VBR are extremely rare, usually the sync problems are due to a clueless encoder with wrong interleaving values. VBR MP3s has worked in divx perfectly for almost two years now. OGG VBR works fine, too.
And for divx 3.11 being awful? If you mean by being awful it being a hack and all that yes, but in terms of quality is far from being awful. A well-encoded 2cd divx 3.11 will look almost as good as the DVD. Xvid has about the same quality but you can get that same quality easier, so it's good for n00bs, but 3.11 is still the king of the hill in the hands of experienced encoders. Yes, there are better codecs than 3.11, but they are not mainstream in the scene due to various reasons. Xvid will probably be better than 3.11 in a few short months, but 3.11 is by no means awful quality-wise.
Why don't you do some encoding yourself and make your own conclusions instead of acting like a clueless moron relaying someone else's opinion as your own.
I've seen Video Disk Recorders for about $1000 that will record a VCD or SVCD in real time of whatever is coming in on the AV jacks, but someone should write software for those of us with TV-in cards and burners to do the same thing.
I'de love to convert all my video tapes to VCD without having to sit there to capture/edit/burn each one.
I realize that the word "hyperbole" has 4 syllables, and therefore beyond your grasp. However, try looking that word up in the dictionary.
The slashbots have no interest in nude women, and the rest of us have access to the real thing.
It took me a while to get used to seing DIVX relating to some new encoding scheme.
I seem to remember a DVD format in the 90s that was a limited play DVD. Wasn't it called DIVX?
Am I just doomed because of my imperfect memory? How many other people remember that stuff?
The point is that when I see DIVX, I think of something I want to avoid in a DVD player.
Wim.
The user's guide says the battery lasts up to two hours with the screen on (four hours with it off)
How could you watch a DVD movie with the screen off??
From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
The EPIA Eden is a small form factor low power consumption x86 based motherboard that has built in CPU, audio, video, ethernet, and tv-out. Just add RAM and a HD. The Eden is cheap at $80. Add in RAM, a small HD, and a DVD drive, and you are looking at around $200. Then all you need is a chasis and powersupply. It is best to use a small chasis and fanless powerfupply.
Then add a highly tweaked and stripped down version of Linux, with DivX, MP3, and DVD functionality.
More detailed specs and pictures can be found here: http://southernwholesale.zoovy.com/product/DVD9510
Surprisingly versatile for the money...
(curiously, Shinsonic does not have this player on their own website, but they do have a portable DVD player with built in Megadrive/Genesis game system, but I digress)
Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
...this player won't be breaking any price records (except upwardly maybe). Call me when Apex sells one.
At home I have a Gainward GeForce2 MX TwinView ViVo Golden Sample - see the review at Tom's Hardware. It's got TV-in *and* TV-out (ViVo), but the TwinView is what really sold me. You can set up multiple monitors using different resolutions, no matter what device you are connected to, such as two RGB monitors or a monitor and a TV (like I have.)
I forget which nView setting I have now, but have it configured for a 1280x960 resoultion on my 19" CRT and a separate 640x480 display on my TV. The Windows taskbar only shows on the CRT, but the TV has a mirror of the background and I can drag windows on to it. I usually leave Winamp running on the TV, but the coolest part is that it automatically scales video to full-screen on the TV. Like the other reply noted, any video window open on my main desktop will run fullscreen on the TV, whether it's in the foreground or not. Definitely worth looking into, as I'm sure Gainward has a newer GF4 card with similar functionality.
What I should have said was nothing.
I have yet to see that. There is S-video and RCA, but what about Component out?
-- Leeeter than leet
You are completely correct. For some god-awful reason, after DivX (the terrible DVD competitor) died, DivX (the MPEG4 codec people) decided to keep the name.
Like the ATI All-in-Wonder Radeons with the ATI Multimedia Center? They have realtime VCD and SVCD recording (AMD Athlon 900, 256MB PC133 SDRAM, works GREAT)
the real at&t mix
i think this kind of thing could really fly;
...this would up the required hdd total capacity significantly.
a linux distro made mostly for a specific setup but flexible enough to work for any computer.
not neccessarily embedded, either; we all have old machines lying around waiting for tasks...
though ideally, a $500 machine w/ tv in/out could easily handle this out of the box (maybe needing hdd and ram upgrades).
h/w would be as described above (with option for mpg2 card for tivo compatibility)
distro would be minimal (no need for gnome or kde, or most gui things; something simple like wmaker or openbox is fine to run xine, gstreamer, or whatever).
i like the idea of the box ripping as needed (like tivo) and then crunching it down to more managable divx (or tarkin, vp3, theora, sorenson, etc) during pre-determined idle time.
minimal distros seem to be a dying breed.
anybody know of a up-to-date distro really good for older machines (90-300mhz)?
Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
hi there you fucking cunt. please STFU. K THX.
nice acronym there fucker. AFAIK. How about;
FU, FOFF, FO&D, suck my nuts, you dumb bitch.
Having just purchased one from a local Wal*Mart, I am suprised at how bad the LCD is on this thing. Not only is it 4" diagonal but it seems to be something on the order of 30dpi (along the lines of the really low-end LCD panels for game consoles.) The video artifacting caused by this is quite distracting (with bright halos around people's faces, nearly illegible subtitles, etc.)
I don't know what the MSNBC reviewer was thinking when he said the video quality was good...It's barely passable and not worth the $.
I'll be going back to the return line and considering upgrading to either a $400 unit capable of normal resolution or considering going to a laptop (although battery life, size, weight, and cost are a big bonus in these portable DVD players.)
The ffmpeg project can decode divx 3.11 files with 100% GPL code. It can even encode to the msmpeg4v3 format, which is essentially what the hacked divx 3.11 binary was outputting.
Diamonds are great for industry. Incredibly hard due to their bonding properties, they make great heatsinks (look up the thermal conductivity of a diamond, there is nothing better). However, karat for karat (am I spelling that right?!?), rubies are rarer then diamonds. De Beers is the ONLY reason why diamonds are worth what they are, otherwise, they're only useful for a bunch of researchers trying to do oddball stuff with a rather cool looking rock.
So, when's lunch?
Ihave a Rage128 AIW, I mean record dirctly to disk in realtime.
For better or worse, I have 200+ CD's encoded with FairUse, which uses the hack Divx :}, 3.11 codec. None with work on this bird. Until FairUse is update or something that will encode exactly the scenes I want at exactly the length I want with the best clarity I have yet seen, I will stick to my method and play them only on my computer.
I don't mind changing the CD every 40 minutes.
Besides the device, the box should contain:
* Eight little rectangular snippets of paper that say "WARNING"
* A plastic packet containing four 5/17 inch pilfer grommets and two
club-ended 6/93 inch boxcar prawns.
YOU WILL NEED TO SUPPLY: a matrix wrench and 60,000 feet of tram cable.
IF ANYTHING IS DAMAGED OR MISSING: You IMMEDIATELY should turn to your spouse
and say: "Margaret, you know why this country can't make a car that can get
all the way through the drive-through at Burger King without a major
transmission overhaul? Because nobody cares, that's why."
WARNING: This is assuming your spouse's name is Margaret.
-- Dave Barry, "Read This First!"
- this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...