Slashdot Mirror


1+ GHz Commodore SX-64 Mod

Spider[DAC] writes "I just found this site, about a person who modified a Commodore SX-64 to contain a 1.2 GHz PIII system. It appears to be a really cool system, and apparantly requires some specially made hardware to make it all interoperate properly. A well-documented read, and definitely something to dream about doing yourself."

46 of 316 comments (clear)

  1. You'll need that 1Ghz+ by reaper20 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heh, let's put it to the test with the /. effect.

    1. Re:You'll need that 1Ghz+ by buck_wild · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hope his web site isn't hosted on that thing...

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    2. Re:You'll need that 1Ghz+ by Dakisha · · Score: 3, Funny

      It gets a slow stream of hits over the course of a day or two. Slashdot throws thousands apon thousands of hits at it in a matter of mins, as we geeks have little better to do with our times than refresh ./ every 5 mins to check for a new story..

  2. What would Weird Al say? by Lothar+0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Think your Commodore 64's pretty neat?
    Put in a P3 and it'll be l33t!

    --
    "Anonymous Coward" is for whistleblowers, not unpopular opinions.
  3. Yes!!! by gik · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...and definitely something to dream about doing yourself."

    Finally!! I get to dream about doing myself!!

    I love you Slashdot!

    --
    ZERO
    1. Re:Yes!!! by erroneus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Strangely, I've had that dream. It was weird.

    2. Re:Yes!!! by hitzroth · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know, I'm glad I'm not the only one who has that dream.

      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
  4. Been said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    True hardware enthusiasts value the electronics, not the plastic that encloses them. That VIC-20 processor is a lot more interesting than a small form factor PC.

    1. Re:Been said before by Cryptnotic · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That VIC-20 processor is a lot more interesting than a small form factor PC.


      No it's not. The VIC-20 used an 8-bit Motorola 6502 microcontroller. It's dead simple. If you took a university course in computer systems architecture, they might have you design a similar CPU for your semester project. They might even have you build it in VHDL, which you could synthesize onto an FPGA.


      Some old systems are intersting for the nostalgia. Others are interesting for novel design. The CPU in the VIC-20 is far less interesting than the nostalgia gleamed from playing old games and reliving your childhood for an hour or so.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  5. My project is the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm attempting to move the innards of a C64 into a Dell case. Wish me luck!

    1. Re:My project is the opposite by m.lemur · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good luck. It'll be an improvement on the Dell anyway.

    2. Re:My project is the opposite by secondsun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude! You killing a Dell!

      --
      There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
    3. Re:My project is the opposite by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, I did just this with a 486 Packard Bell. (details)

      First, I converted the c64 motherboard to run from the PC power supply. Then I installed a 1571 floppy drive in the 5.25" drive bay. The 3.5" drive was hooked up to a 1581 controller board, and a Super Snapshot V4 rounded out the system.

      For the keyboard, I used the original C64 case (now empty) with a DB25 cable, and replaced the red power LED with a nice bright blue one. :)

  6. Wow by Apreche · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's very impressive. I mean the most I did was get a 14.4 modem into a normal Commodore 64. And I've seen guys who took Apple][gs machines and installed hard drives, cd burners, nics, and got everything from wolf3d and down to run on them. Even web browsing and AIM.

    Even though it's not practical or useful for the average person I think it's good that there is proof that unless you are playing games or doing other high powered tasks like encoding video, that you don't need a new powerful machine.

    Radio Shack Coco 2 in the house

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Wow by karnal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Radio Shack Coco 2 in the house"

      I remember dreaming of having enough money one day to get the 512KB memory upgrade for my coco3....

      Or, drooling over the 1MB or 2MB upgrades, or the 0 wait state disk controller (OS9 goodness....)

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:Wow by fatboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      or the 0 wait state disk controller (OS9 goodness....)

      A friend of mine had the Frank Hog Labs 0 wait state disk controller. I only had a DISTO Super Controller II 4-n-1 and it sucked!

      Multi User, Multi Tasking with less than 512k of ram. OS9 rocked. I still have the c compiler around here somewhere for it.

      --
      --fatboy
  7. For crying out loud by shepd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Destroying the rarest C64 ever made to change it in to a PC?

    People that do this don't deserve to have old computers. (IMHO).

    This is like taking a Model-T Ford and "converting" it into a Toyota Corolla.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:For crying out loud by carpe_noctem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From the website:
      the sx-64 dissapeared as quickly as it arrived. today they remain a collector's item.

      20 years later

      given, the sx-64 kicked ass in the 1980's, but my current computer is literally 1600 times faster than this thing! i wouldn't use a 5-year old computer without complaining, let alone a 20 year old computer. computers need to be able to stream DVDs, movies, surf the internet, play 3d games, and store gigabytes worth of mp3's before they can be considered useful nowadays.


      I couldn't agree with you more. This guy basically bastardized a collectible antique computer and stripped it of all its value to make it a marginal desktop computer. If he was so concerned about having a "usable computer" for everyday computing tasks, he'd be better off buying a 60$ case and power supply. He'll be sorry in another 25 years when he sees one of these selling for big bucks on "Antiques Roadshow".

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    2. Re:For crying out loud by RollingThunder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep. I have a working Kaypro... I -could- gut it and install my Athlon in it... but then all I'd have would be an athlon, in a wierd case. The working Kaypro is way cooler. :)

      Now, making a REPLICA case, that's another story. Hmm....

    3. Re:For crying out loud by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm sorry (not), but this guy should do anything he wants with his hardware. It's now usable on daily basis, and most likely will be better taken care of than a 'closet classic'. Christ - you people talk like there were only 3 ever made and one went down with the Titanic.

      Sure, its a casemod. It's no longer the computer it was. But guess what? He likes it.

      I can understand the guys who spend 300 some hours making a clear acrylic case for their Duron machines, and people who turn Mac SE's into fishtanks, and guys who make their classic 67 Beetle into some bastardized trike, ect ect. It's what they like to do.

      I wouldn't do it myself, but what's important here?

      The fact that this will be used with the form intact and the function 'improved'? Or that it stays in it's original form and decaying function?

      Is the next post I read on /. going to be how everyone should go back to the 1.0 Linux kernal, "Cause that's da way it should be." ?? Ugh.

      Personally, I'd love to have a Next Cube with an shit-hot PC in it. Why? So I could use it for what I do *now*, and look at it's beatiful shape and color while I record music and edit video on it. Would I miss the Next OS? Sure, maybe. Would it get used on a daily basis? (We're talking 040 processor, people)

      No.

      But hey what the hell do I know?

    4. Re:For crying out loud by shayne321 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Yeah, next thing you know people will be turning IBM PC's into catboxes. Sheesh.

      Shayne

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
  8. About Time by carb · · Score: 4, Funny

    It took 15 years, but I can finally play my C64 copy of "Bad Dudes" at more than 5 frames per second - hoorah!

  9. A C64? by bytesmythe · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's nothin'... I have the original UNIVAC in my spare house that I modified to use AMD 2.2 GHz Athlon XPs. Of course, the blinkenlights flash on and off so fast they burn out in just a few seconds. Then again, the original wiring was only run at 2.2 MEGAhz, so trying to get all the timing right was a nightmare.

    And have you ever tried searching PriceWatch for a PGA to vacuum tube converter? Sheeeeesh... You'd think people had never heard of retrocomputing.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
  10. A little audio theme to go along with that... by apk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you're at all into the C64, you've got to check out the song "C64 Convention" by mindfusion, available for free on mp3.com.

    Cool old school electronica that rocks.


    Andy

  11. Whoa this is really cool by SuperDuG · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Take a regular PC and load up an emulator on it while still using the old case. This isn't a hardware hack, it's a case mod if anything. Anyone else interested in a really fast C64??

    Frodo is a crossplatform C64 emulator for windows, macos, beos, riscos, and many more. Take the system you have now and use it as a C64, or emulate a million other systems as well.

    I'm really sorry, but this is yet another case of shoddy journalism and actual fact checking before publishing. I know slashdot is far from a "professional" grade news source, but I would like to think that there is at least a small bit of integrity in there somewhere. Speaking of integrity, whatch this get modded down, -1 Troll, -1 Offtopic, -1 Redundant, -1 Overrated, -1 too many mod points for editors.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Whoa this is really cool by megabeck42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Woah, cut the guy some credit! This isn't just a case hack; he didn't just spend 4 hours with a dremel.

      He went to the trouble of using the orignal keyboard. That means he designed and programmed a microprocessor to convert the matrix from the keyboard into the serial stream for the ps/2 port.

      According to his tech page, he's going to build a switching power supply, which isn't easy to do right, to replace the 1U power supply he's currently using.

      Oh, and there's the sound interface, too, more custom hardware.

      Sure, he's using an emulator, but, he's also using a lot of the original hardware.

      I'd like to see you do that.

      --
      fnord.
  12. /.'ed by Sivar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hopefully the website's server isn't this guy's shiny ...er, new SX-64. It just melted.

    The page:



    this page is dedicated to my efforts to skillfully implant a 1+GHZ system inside of my Commodore SX-64 portable computer. this modification will be completely stealth. in fact, when my C64 emulator is running, it should be completely indistinguishable from the original system. however, when the emulator is not running, i will be able to watch DVDs, play MP3s, surf the internet, and play games from anywhere through windows XP. a truly portable system, complete with integrated monitor, keyboard, and handle! lan parties here i come!

    SX-64 History

    this was my commodore sx-64 before it was modified. i got it for free from a friend at work back some time in january. this little machine was the world's first COLOR portable computer system. the keyboard doubles as a protective face for the case. the handle doubles as a tilting arm to make the monitor more viewable.

    the original unmodified SX-64

    the system has a built-in 5-inch color CRT monitor, a commodore 1541 disk drive, a 1mhz cpu, 64k of RAM, MOS6581 sound chip, and a VIC20 video chip (320x200 pixels, 4-bit color, 40x25 text mode). it also comes with a built-in speaker, a game cartridge slot on the top, an expansion port on the back, an RS232-C serial port, two gameports, and composite NTSC/PAL out (depending on where your SX-64 came from). the operating system is SX-64 BASIC (developed by microsoft!!). the system was released in 1983 and retailed for around $1000 USD.

    some of the world's best games (IMO) were for this system. classics like the original PAC-MAN, donkey kong, maniac mansion, etc were well worth the price of the system back in the day. not to mention, the BASIC operating system was so easy to use, you could program your own game in no time. no microsoft APIs, DLLs, or bluescreens to deal with! just PEEK and POKE your graphics and sounds to memory, and you were on your way to being a professional programmer (aside from learning assembly, of course :]).

    from what i've read, the SX-64 was a flop because it was targeted towards the business market (it was called the "executive computer"). it competed with laptops like the Toshiba T-1000, but was heavier, had no batteries, and didn't fit in your lap. the sx-64 dissapeared as quickly as it arrived. today they remain a collector's item.

    20 years later

    given, the sx-64 kicked ass in the 1980's, but my current computer is literally 1600 times faster than this thing! i wouldn't use a 5-year old computer without complaining, let alone a 20 year old computer. computers need to be able to stream DVDs, movies, surf the internet, play 3d games, and store gigabytes worth of mp3's before they can be considered useful nowadays.

    the only way to wedge a new motherboard in my C64 will be to go SMALL.

    the latest computer craze (at least the latest craze i've been following) is the 'small form factor' (SFF) PC. these little systems work great for home theater PCs (HTPCs), internet terminals, and lan parties. i, for one, would hate to lug a full-size tower and monitor to a lan party and back. but my SX-64 above would be perfect for lan parties. it has a handle, it's rugged, and everything's built-in (even the monitor!).

    SFF motherboards (the two big form factors now are Flex ATX and Mini ITX) are the perfect choice for my project because they have integrated sound, network, video, and tv out. the tv out is probably the most important since the c64's internal CRT takes an NTSC s-video input. without it, the screen would be useless. the only bad part is that the 3d graphics will suck pretty hard (s3 savage core) so lan parties will suck for me because i will probably get killed a lot since i'll probably be playing at a low resolution. (update: I'm running about 40fps in cstrike in 800x600. It's not as good as a Geforce4, but at least it's faster than the original c64's VIC chip!

    Research

    planning plays a big part in any big project. if i was just adding a window kit or something stupid like that, yea i could just go to town with a dremel and not expect any real problems. but if i cut too much away from the case, or just guessed on which wires to solder, this whole project would be over.

    after searching around the internet, i found the original schematics for the seperate boards inside the sx-64. several circuit boards will have to be designed and etched to interface the sx-64 case to the newer hardware. (update: most of these boards can be found in the tech info section). many hours of dremeling the steel inside the case were required, because the original cards were mounted vertically, and my motherboard has to go in horizontally.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    1. Re:/.'ed by Jouster · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm adding more content to it as I get it, but here's what I have so far:

      My Mirror.

      Jouster

  13. What about... by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Overclocking? Has anybody ever tried to OC a C64?

  14. I have a dream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    definitely something to dream about doing yourself.

    No. I'll continue my long-standing tradition of dreaming about a trio of beautiful, naked, goth-looking chicks who service my every need. I rather like that dream.

    But if you want to dream about the Commodore 64, go right ahead.

  15. Re:Is it really destroyed? by jandrese · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since it's bad analogy day on Slashdot how about this:

    It's like taking a Model-T, ripping it apart, and using the body panels to make a Toyota look like a Model-T.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  16. Hope that SX-64 wasn't working. by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Hope that SX-64 wasn't functioning when he gutted it, as there are some Commodore fans who are weeping that another SX-64 bit the dust. It'd be like gutting an Osborne so you can put a PC in there to have the ultimate lan party machine. Sure, it'd be cool and all, but the original is far cooler.

    Chalk one vote for nostalgia and leaving rare and cool things alone.

  17. What the ...? by arb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...modified a Commodore SX-64 to contain a 1.2 GHz PIII system.

    Hardly a 1+ GHz Commodore SX-64 Mod. More like a simple case-mod effort. Slapping a small form-factor MB into an SX-64 case is kinda cool, but it ain't that cool. Now, building a real C64 notebook or building a souped up C64 (not emulated) would be damn cool.

  18. Commodore One by antibryce · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.go64.de/english/frames/frame.htm

    Looks like an interesting project. They're building a fully backwards compatible mobo which should support all existing C64/128 software. The best part is the CPU is 20MHZ and the Sid emulation will have 16 voices!

    It's all only $200, and will fit into any ATX style case.

  19. Beowulf by Superfreaker · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish some Scandanavian warrior would rip this guys arms off :-)

    Made you look!

  20. Now that I think about it... by thelinuxking · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows XP would REALLY suck with only 64k of memory...

    And to start the thing up without a hard drive? I figure it would go something like this:

    LOAD "WINXP",8,1
    LOADING...
    FLIP DISK TO SIDE 2
    PLEASE WAIT...
    INSERT DISK 2 OF 5.34E20
    PLEASE WAIT...

    1. Re:Now that I think about it... by Wolfier · · Score: 3, Funny

      While loading the 5.34E20-th floppy:

      GENERAL PROTECTION FAULT.
      SYSTEM STOP ERROR AT $24FF
      TO RESTART, INSERT DISK 1

  21. Re:No /. elitist anti-Windows comments? by zulux · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's with you people? Didn't you read that this thing runs Windows XP?

    Runs Windows XP? More precisly: Limps-along with Windows XP like a mangy three-legged dog that stopes every ten feet to eat it's own poop that dribbels out it's ass.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  22. What's Next? by limekiller4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of these days, I'm going to wake up, select Slashdot from my bookmarks, and find that the top story is about some 7 year-old who managed to get his bicycle -- complete with training wheels and little brother onboard -- into lower earth orbit using some recently GPL'd Mathematica clone, an overclocked Furby, 50ft of CAT5 scavenged from the local LUGs trash bin and Jack Valenti's ego tinsnipped into tiles for the re-entry shielding.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  23. ... and he hardly knew what he was talking about by Montreal+Geek · · Score: 3, Informative
    Sheesh.

    Destroying a neat piece of collectible cruft like that is bad enough, but it appears he actually knew very little about what he was destroying.

    - The video chip was named 'VIC' not 'VIC20' (which was another, bittier, box).
    - Neither Pac-Man nor Donkey Kong were originals on that platform, or indeed even faithful reproductions.
    - I'm not even going to go into that 'BASIC operating system' bit [but hey, now that I think of it, it does establish a pattern for Microsoft 'OS'es]
    - The T-1000 was a nice piece of PCish hardware; but had no battery either. Mains or no dice.

    ... But most of all, I am amazed at even his missing the irony of stating he wouldn't be able to use a five year old computer "without complaining" yet one of his admitted design goals was that he could run an emulator so that he could.

    -- MG

  24. That damn ENTER key by rsteele19 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I see it uses the original Commodore keyboard... I wonder, do you still need to use a hammer to press the "Enter" key?

    --

    This sig is umop apisdn.

  25. Great Hardware design... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 5, Funny

    The SX-64 page mentions--
    "Ah, the DX. That was the american version which had 2 disk drives. (The UK gets short changed
    again! - Akuma). Our european version had one plus a hole marked 'Storage'. Very useful, as long
    as you don't store disks in there; the magnetic fields generated by the SX64's drive tends to wipe
    them clean or corrupt them at the very least. Nice piece of design.
    "

    Probably Commodore's way of paying tribute to the Coleco Adam..

  26. Next up : 2.0 GHz C-128D by baine · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dig-dug oughtta get something like 3,500 fps.

    --
    Need a simple, easy to use data tier generator? http://www.gryphinsoftware.com/
  27. Ten Years Behind the Curve by ewhac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is Old News.

    In the late 1980's, one of the Amiga luminaries, Dale Luck, got his hands on a Commodore SX-64 (when they were slightly less rare), hollowed it out, and stuck an Amiga 500 in it.

    Apparently one of the toughest parts of the hack was getting the keyboard to work as the C-64 keyboard layout and electronics are completely different from everything else. Fitting the motherboard was also a bit of a squeeze. All in all, it was an amusing hack, but because the SX-64's color monitor was of such low resolution, it was a struggle to read, even at 640 * 200 pixels. So it was cute but, alas, not useful.

    As others have already observered, gutting one of these rarities to stick a PC in it is just sacrelige.

    Schwab

  28. 6502 is easy... in software by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It's not so hard in software. VHDL may be another matter of course. Ugh, hardware :-(

    I wrote the guts of a 65816 core in C in a few days, which is a superset of the 6502. The bugs in it were due to inadequate documentation rather than inherent difficulty. e.g. if you perform TXS in native mode with 8 bit indexes, does the high byte of the stack get set to 1 or 0?

    6502 is very simple compared to Z80 or other 8 bit chips. I still think the SPC700 is the prettiest though :-) and current RISC chips with their weird special-purpose instructions barely deserve the name. Bring back the One Instruction Computer :-0

  29. Re:For crying out loud - IMPORTANT by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Let me put this in terms I deal with all the time. Say I buy a guitar. I know that this guitar is not being made anymore and that I paid 100 dollars for it at a garage sale.

    I know that I can sell it right now for $400. I also know I can wait 5 years and it will be worth a grand - if I put it in it's case and leave it in the closet.

    If I play this guitar, invaribly I will put a ding in it here, a scratch in it there. I will need to change its strings, adjust the bridge, most likely adjust the neck. All these things are pretty much normal maintainance for an instrument that has not been played, or is heading into a new season.

    Say this guitar has a bad pickup in it (and I have decided to play it). I have these options:

    Leave it alone.

    A new Pickup

    Rewind the Original pickup.

    A new pickup destroys (the collector's) resale and also maximizes choice.

    A rewound pickup is less damaging to resale, but does not present as much choice.

    Blahblahblah.

    My point is this: People are watching too much Antiques Roadshow, and Lost Treasures, and endlessly refreshing pages on eBay. They lose sight of an important thing.

    In 90 percent of collectables, the 'collectable' item was *meant to be used*. Crackerjack toys were meant to be played with, China teapots were meant to serve hot tea, guitars were meant to be played, cars were meant to be driven.

    That is the purpose of their existence. These items had something special about them: they worked well for their purpose, they were fun, they never broke, or you had your first date in one.

    In many of these items, form follows function - an apple peeler used by Gramma looks pretty much the same as one you can buy now. In some guitars (especially) function follows form - they look great, but were cheaply made, or are banged up and *used*.

    If I love the form of a NeXT cube enough, I'll want to use it all the time. I'll want to see it, and touch it, and *use* it but I don't do things that that hardware can do.

    Sure, I have stuff that is put away and not modded, or used. I have Hot Wheels still in the package, I have a guitar that sits in a case, I have a Beatles keychain in a drawer. I can look at these things and be happy I have something that not many others have - but I'd rather be using them in the context of their creation.

    Some things I have learned in my short lifetime - Keep and use the things you love, get rid of the things you don't. Life is too short to be worried about resale.

    You get one ticket for the ride, make sure its the ride you want to be on.