Slashdot Mirror


Russians Reveal Early Death of Laika

jonerik writes "Contrary to long-believed Soviet reports that Laika the space dog - the first living animal to be launched into orbit from Earth - lived for a week or so after she was launched into orbit aboard Sputnik 2 in November 1957, CNN is now reporting that Dimitri Malashenkov of the Institute for Biomedical Problems in Moscow has presented a scientific paper at the World Space Congress in Houston, Texas in which he revealed that Laika actually died a few hours after launch due to thermal insulation problems overheating the cabin interior. Sputnik 2 remained in orbit a total of 162 days, before burning up in the atmosphere on April 14, 1958."

72 comments

  1. That explains why China is working on a space prog by Ashran · · Score: 4, Funny

    > died a few hours after launch due to thermal insulation problems overheating the cabin interior
    China is just looking for new ways to cook dogs alive without animal rights organisations close by :)

    --

    Before you email me, remember: "There is no god!"
  2. lame by Baikala · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember a french comic named "proteo" where a green-java-like alien observing the earth space race substracted laika from the vesel and adopted her as a mascot. Even as a little kid i knew it was just fantasy but I always want it to be true. RIP laika

    --
    16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
    1. Re:lame by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      Same thing happened in Julian May's Surveillance

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  3. Re:That explains why China is working on a space p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont get why this is moderated as flamebait??

  4. Damn I hungry... by xagon7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hot-dogs anyone?

    I couldnt resist...

    1. Re:Damn I hungry... by falzer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uh... hm. What part of the dog did you get in your hot-dog?

  5. oh Crap! what about ... by Chiggy_Von_Richtoffe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Snowy?
    TinTin what have you done!!!!

  6. A dog? In space? by floydigus · · Score: 0, Troll

    Pure fantasy!

    --

    All things in moderation; including moderation

  7. The dog was gassed. by selectspec · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The said part is that the dog had a better chance of surving in a leaky space craft than in the old Soviet Union.

    Let's face it, if Wolfy had made it home alive he'd have been in a Stalinburger with extra cheese within a fort night.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  8. of course she died. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The original story didn't make much sense.Seeing that the room for payload in sputnik-2 was probably on the order of 20lbs, how could she have lived for a few weeks without food and water?

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    1. Re:of course she died. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uhh, the dog had food and water for 10 days. that has been public for a long time....

  9. Ethics of this by Locke!Erasmus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm really surprised they didn't include a humane method of euthanizing the animal in the spacecraft. I think it's very sad.

    --
    I should have picked out the nickname Demosthenes!Tecumseh.
    1. Re:Ethics of this by !splut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, it was a biological experiment, not just a technogical one. It was important that they observe the dog's unadulterated biological reaction to the weightless environment. What if weightlessness had some acute biological consequence?

      In the end, they did gather important data about life support in space capsules ("don't insulate so well"). So, yea, I agree it wasn't humane treatment, but at least it wasn't gratuitous.

      --
      The angel in the oatmeal.
    2. Re:Ethics of this by SB5 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you aren't thinking of Schrodinger's Cat? Or the Nazi's weird pseudo-medical experiments? Of course if this was done in the United States... PETA would file a lawsuit faster than you can say "Double Cheeseburger"

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    3. Re:Ethics of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm really surprised they didn't include a humane method of euthanizing the animal in the spacecraft.

      Reportedly Sputnik 2's food delivery system included a "last meal" - a poison pill which would have euthanized Laika painlessly rather than allowing her to suffocate or starve to death. However, since she didn't survive long enough to eat the entire food supply, it was never used.

    4. Re:Ethics of this by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      "but at least it wasn't gratuitous"

      Yeah, just think of all the good to humanity that was done by shooting a dog into space. Ok, I'm off to bleed some dogs to death to uh, figure out uh, how long they live, uh, or something.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    5. Re:Ethics of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really surprised they didn't include a humane method of euthanizing the animal in the spacecraft.

      They did. It's called re-entry.

      Oh, did you say "humane?" Gee, I didn't see that in the mission requirements . . . .

      (Sorry, couldn't help it)

    6. Re:Ethics of this by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2

      I'm really surprised they didn't include a humane method of euthanizing the animal in the spacecraft. I think it's very sad.

      Given Soviet history ethics would have had little to do with it. Politics might have motivated such a system, or at least motivated a false claim to have had such a system. Even in the post-Stalin kinder gentler Soviet Union look how they treated people, their own highly trained Cosmonauts, genuine heros: take away pressure suits and you can fit three in a two man capsule. One valve failure during re-entry and all were lost, bubbles forming in their blood as cabin pressure is lost (think of shaking a soda can and popping the top).

    7. Re:Ethics of this by packeteer · · Score: 2

      Obviosuly you dont understand Schrodinger's cat if you say it died. The cat is not killed. Schrodinger has simply created several alternate universes in which some of the time the cat dies and sometimes it doesn't.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    8. Re:Ethics of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a muslim? That's exactly how they prepare meat.

  10. science books by eamonman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny how the old science books from way back in middle school neglect to mention that she never came back alive after being the first animal in space. I guess you don't want kids unecessarily grieving over an acheivement that only merits a few sentences. Oh well, I suppose it wouldn't be in a science book's editor's interest to turn a young budding scientist into a young budding animal rights activist.

    --
    0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
    1. Re:science books by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Oh well, I suppose it wouldn't be in a science book's editor's interest to turn a young budding scientist into a young budding animal rights activist.


      You speak as if the two are mutually exclusive.

      Science has continually worked against anthrocentrism - the belief than humans are somehow "special" in the universe. The philosophy of animal rights is simply the application of this anti-anthrocentrism to ethical questions.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:science books by The+Red+Rooster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The philosophy of animal rights is simply the application of this anti-anthrocentrism to ethical questions.

      Ummm...NO.

      Animal Rights is a form of anthropomorphising, attributing (wrongly) human traits to animals.

      To quote:

      <whine>
      "Animals have feelings too..."
      </whine>

      Eradicating the rather silly belief that humans are somehow 'special' would have the result of allowing Gov't funded research, here in the US, of embryonic stemcells.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    3. Re:science books by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Animal Rights is a form of anthropomorphising, attributing (wrongly) human traits to animals.

      No. You're clearly unfamiliar with philosophical thought in the area.

      "Animals have feelings too..."

      The only being I am sure has feelings (is possessed of the capability to suffer, is sentient, is the "subject-of-a-life") is me.

      Based on structural and behavioral similarities, I conclude that other humans probably have the same property. Those same structural and behavioral similarities inexorably lead to the conclusion that, to some degree, non human animals also share that property.

      Indeed, it's a non-sequitor of the highest order to claim that "Animals are like humans, so we can get good research data from doing cruel things to them, and it's ok to do so because they're nothing like humans."

      Eradicating the rather silly belief that humans are somehow 'special' would have the result of allowing Gov't funded research, here in the US, of embryonic stemcells.

      Um...and this relates to animal rights how? Stemcells have no subjectivity. I don't have an problem with research involving them.

      Now, if you want to do these tests on non-consenting humans or other animals, then there's an issue, but it's orthoganal to the use of stem cells.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    4. Re:science books by f97tosc · · Score: 2

      Funny how the old science books from way back in middle school neglect to mention that she never came back alive after being the first animal in space. I guess you don't want kids unecessarily grieving over an acheivement that only merits a few sentences. Oh well, I suppose it wouldn't be in a science book's editor's interest to turn a young budding scientist into a young budding animal rights activist.

      I think they failure to mention the fate of the dog had a completely different reason: namely that it was considered utterly irrelevant. Fifty years ago there were no animal rights activists. People simply did not make an issue out of a dead dog back then.

      Tor

  11. Re:Makes me sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would you prefer they sent a person up as an initial test?.. yourself perhaps?

  12. Hee hee... by C0LDFusion · · Score: 3, Funny

    I never met a Space Dog I didn't Laika!

    Oh, well...

    Anyway, I think its interesting to remember that Dogs made it into space before humans.



    ...that is unless you belong to a UFO cult like the Raelians and think we're originally from outer space.

    --
    Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
  13. Center for What Now? by rcs2 · · Score: 1

    Since when is "death within hours" a "biomedical problem"?

    --
    This is not a signature.
    1. Re:Center for What Now? by SB5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it involves the Soviet Union, then it has to be listed as such, the CIA and FBI just can't release the pertinent files that explain the "biomedical problem", (insert recent space alien conspircy with the Top Level US government officials here)

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
  14. Re:That explains why China is working on a space p by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

    That's nothing, you should see what they do to monkeys! No cooking required!

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  15. they are not "animal" rights organizations.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they are pet rights organizations.. they dont give a shit about beef and poultry, but if its cute and cuddly and can be bought at a pet store, it all the sudden deserves rights..

    if we kept pet cows or chickens or pigs in USA, and ate dogs, and china ate cows/chickens/pigs, the "animal" rights whackos would protest that instead...

    1. Re:they are not "animal" rights organizations.. by t0qer · · Score: 2

      Yes when I think of America I think of the great west, dudes driving the cattle train across the open prairie, cookie w00pin up some beans over the fire, and somewhere a coyote is howling under the full moon.

      Awwwoooooooooooooooooooo

    2. Re:they are not "animal" rights organizations.. by bytesmythe · · Score: 2

      What color is the sky on your planet? Animal rights organizations (such as PETA) are very strongly opposed to the way livestock animals are treated.

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
  16. Make all the jokes you want... by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But having a dog burn to death is a terrible, terrible thing.

    Our house burnt down when I was 6, and I watched as our family's golden retriever -- coincidentally named "Lucky" -- was trapped under a burning dresser it slept by in the living room. It let out howls of torment that haunt me to this day as it died slowly being helplessly charred as my mom covered my tearful eyes and my father was unable to save it.

    So please show some respect for Laika.

    1. Re:Make all the jokes you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must say i admire you. You're one of the greatest trolls i've ever seen.

    2. Re:Make all the jokes you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gets better with every post.

    3. Re:Make all the jokes you want... by olman · · Score: 2

      Oh come on. The mutt bought it due to heat stroke/dehydration/what have you. Talking about the space doggie, of course.

    4. Re:Make all the jokes you want... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      hardly dehydration.. that happens over a period of time. This was due to the atmosphere.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    5. Re:Make all the jokes you want... by olman · · Score: 2

      Yeah, they probably had some drinking water included. So, okay, the doggie probably could replace liquid at the same rate it was sweating it. Probably means it got a heat stroke..

    6. Re:Make all the jokes you want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, good, but be careful of the bits of info that blow away your troll. Burning dresser in the living room? What is this the Beverly Hillbillies? Should've said bedroom. Also, don't go for the ironic coincidences like the dog being named "Lucky" and burning in a fire. Try using a more common name and give some feeling about how the poor dog was your best friend and you will miss it always. :-(

    7. Re:Make all the jokes you want... by mekkab · · Score: 2

      Good sir, you are a genius.

      Your post contains the best troll/flamebait I have ever witnessed in my few short years on slashdot.

      I don't even care if your post is true or not. You have stirred something in my soul with such force that I am flabbergasted.

      I pledge my undying support, king of all trolls.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  17. Re:Makes me sick! by vstanescu · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yes, it should have been better to send a human (or even better, a criminal) instead of an animal for that flight, for a lot of reasons: we have enough of them to spare, they will at least know what will happen to them and they are able to speak, informing the scientists what is happening to them.

  18. Re:Makes me sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But they might lie. Imagine - you're a criminal, sentenced to death. As your dying act of revenge upon the unjust society with wrongly convicted you, you screw up the scientist's results big time.

  19. Re:Makes me sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Better yet, send an entire boy band.

  20. Re:Makes me sick! by corbettw · · Score: 2

    "...and they are able to speak, informing the scientists what is happening to them."

    Yeah, but someone yelling "OHMYGODITBUUUURNS!!!!" isn't much better than what they had.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  21. Re:science books (anthropomorphising) by jungd · · Score: 4, Informative
    Animal Rights is a form of anthropomorphising, attributing (wrongly) human traits to animals.

    <whine> "Animals have feelings too..." </whine>

    As a scientist who studies cognition in all animals, including humans, I can tell you that in the case of any mammal, while their feelings are not the same as ours, they're pretty damn close.

    Luckily, they don't have the same broad autobiographical understanding of 'self', and hence don't feer death in the same way (they typically have a very shallow understanding of death, but still obviously fear pain)

    Having said that; I aggee with your first statement, but probably not with specifically which traits.

    --
    /..sig file not found - permission denied.
  22. Was there a plan to put her down? by monopole · · Score: 1

    Some accounts of the mission indicated that the last food pellets within the probe had a fast acting poision to at least make Laika's death fast and relatively humane.

    Of course this is now quite moot.

    1. Re:Was there a plan to put her down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      to at least make Laika's death fast and relatively humane.

      A humane -life- before Laika's death would have been nice, also.

  23. Re:Makes me sick! by f97tosc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I never heard of this history. To think that they launched that poor defenseless puppy knowing full well that it would eventually die of starvation/lack of oxygen is horrible. Such inhumane treatment. The people that did this should be ashamed!

    We humans kill animals for a large number of reasons: food, clothing, entertainment and science.

    Out of these, the animals killed for science are relatively limited in numbers, but large in their payoff to man. In this case the payoff was priceless information about how to set up a cabin.

    If you are so concerned about animals I suggest you focus your struggle on the entertainment portion (hunting, animal fights), then food and clothing, science last.

    Tor

  24. Re:Makes me sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you eat meat, eggs, or dairy? Have you ever owned something made of leather? Have you ever received any form of medical treatment, pharmaceutical, or cosmetic?

    If the answer is yes to any of those questions, you can shut up and go away.

  25. Re:science books (anthropomorphising) by The+Red+Rooster · · Score: 1

    I can accept that. :)

    Something I've always wanted to know... just HOW does one go about determining whether animals have feelings or not? They obviously can't communicate on anything more than the most primitive of yes/no concepts.

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  26. Re:science books (anthropomorphising) by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2
    just HOW does one go about determining whether animals have feelings or not?

    I'm curious what the most "scientific" available test for this is myself - the problem isn't really any different than determining whether OTHER HUMAN BEINGS have feelings or not...

    Seriously. I mean, if people can think that John Travolta shows 'feelings' when he's acting, surely others could be faking it...how do I know that I'm not the only human being in the world gifted with "feelings" while everyone else is a mindless robot who's just pretending?

    Outside of a "hard science" context, that's a pretty nonsensical question - we "just know" other people (in general) have feelings. "I just know" is nowhere near sufficient for real science, though.

    Anyone with significant interaction with other (nonhuman) mammals "just knows" those animals have feelings, too, but it's rather difficult to prove in a "hard science" sort of way. I suspect the best that can be done is comparisons of brain scans and such between humans and non-humans to the extent that one can say in a more-or-less "hard science" way - "it is probable that other mammals have subjective feelings similar in quality to those of human beings, or at least, that is the most likely explanation for the similarities of response."

  27. Re:Makes me sick! by Schik · · Score: 1
    You may think that science benefits from animal cruelty the most, but they're also more cruel to animals than you can imagine.

    This is how wonderful science is to animals.

  28. What a shame by buzzdecafe · · Score: 2, Funny

    He was my favorite character on "Taxi."

    "Tank you very much."

  29. One of my favorite songs... by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

    is Laika, by the Spanish group Mecano. Rough translation:

    She was Russian and her name was Laika
    she was a very normal dog
    she went from being a common animal
    to be a world star.
    They put her into a spaceship
    to observe the reaction
    She was the first astronaut
    in outer space.
    ---
    Ready is the rocket for take off
    ground control tells Laika goodbye.
    ---
    In base everything was silent
    waiting for any signal.
    All with the helmets to their ears
    heard the dog bark.
    While on Earth a great party,
    shouting, laughter, crying and champagne,
    Laika looked out through the window.
    "What is that colored ball?
    And why am I going around it?".
    ---
    One night, on the telescope
    a new light appeared
    nobody could give an explanation
    to the appearance of the new sun.
    And if we listen to the legend
    then we'll have to think
    that on Earth there is one less dog
    and on the sky one more star.

  30. Re:Makes me sick! by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

    Or even better yet, a criminal animal rights activist.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  31. Racist Moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why in hell do you consider this funny? Because you don't eat dog? Americans eat corn and that's considered filth in some countries. You eat lobster which was considered a dirty scavenger just a little more than a century ago. Well it's China who's laughing at you behind your backs. Your greed is fueling the birth of the next first world superpower. Soon the USA will be facing a true economic and military dragon that it never dreamed could exist. Arrogant fools wake up or become extinct.

    1. Re:Racist Moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your greed is fueling the birth of the next first world superpower

      The next first world superpower you say?

  32. ughhh... by eurostar · · Score: 0

    this is so sick.

    those experimenting should have been sent up instead, and had their "last meal".

    humans are beyond hope...

    1. Re:ughhh... by Dexter's+Laboratory · · Score: 1

      What would be worse, to force humans to be the first living beings onboard spacecrafts, or let animals go first making it safer for humans later on?

  33. Totally Offtopic, please don't mod down by bytesmythe · · Score: 1

    Tor,

    Are you the same Tor/Tosc who used to play Mozart mud?

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
  34. Re:Makes me sick! by aflat362 · · Score: 0

    To think that they launched that poor defenseless puppy knowing full well that it would eventually die of starvation/lack of oxygen is horrible. Such inhumane treatment. The people that did this should be ashamed!

    I agree. Wouldn't it have been a better test for them to do everything they can to keep the dog alive? That's what the goal is for humans, isn't it?

    --

    Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

  35. When I was in Washington D.C. 3 weeks ago... by Squeezer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I went to the Smithsonian's Air and Space Museum and took the 1 hour tour with the guide. When we reached the mockup of sputnik 1, the tour guide said that then the Soviets donated it (didn't ask when it was donated tho) they admitted that the dog died because the A/C system on it failed.

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
  36. Re:science books (anthropomorphising) by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 2
    Seriously. I mean, if people can think that John Travolta shows 'feelings' when he's acting, surely others could be faking it...how do I know that I'm not the only human being in the world gifted with "feelings" while everyone else is a mindless robot who's just pretending?

    Well, if you're going to go all scientifically philosophical on us, how can you be sure that we exist at all? Maybe we're just figments of your imagination? ;-)

    Just what assumptions you have to make to "prove" that others have feelings would be interesting to discuss though.

    --
    Stefan Axelsson
  37. A Dog's Life by jtree · · Score: 1

    "Dogs are People Too!"
    - Radar O'Reilly, M*A*S*H

  38. Damned If You Do and Damned If You Don't by fuzdout · · Score: 1

    First off, I think it is terribly sad the dog died up there (I was aware of the Laika story except for the part where she never came back down to earth).
    However, what some people tend to forget is they aren't sending someone's pet dog up there they send their own dogs (animals) that they breed and raise specifically for laboratory animal tests..At least that is what they do here, in the USA.
    Anyway, the point is she probably didn't have a very good quality life to begin with nor would she have come home to one (if she had survived, though it turns out it was rigged so she'd die up there anyway.) so while it doesn't make it not cruel, she was damned if she did and damned if she didn't.. Just like the whole issue of testing animals in any laboratory experiments..Well, we could test on animals or we can test on humans, -pick your poison..I'm sure nobody at the time wanted to shoot up their old Aunt Birtha, so I think that kind of limited them to picking an animal :)

    Why a dog? I dunno. I'd rather they picked another critter but that is because like most Americans I was raised with the idea that dogs are "pets" and to be treated more highly than say what we consider traditional "food animals" such as cows.
    There are other countries where if you sent a cow you'd have just murdered your Great Uncle Ralph (or so they believe).. Their wasn't any other way around it other than creating a robot that could accurately mimic real flesh and blood creatures reactions to stimuli.

    BTW "Laika" is also the name of a specicfic breed of Russian dog called East Siberian Laika..Also West Siberian Laika..I've heard from Laika people that the space dog was one of those.. However, I've always read in Science books she was a mix breed.

    --
    Fuzdout
    ..My sig ran away. Has anyone seen my sig?