Slashdot Mirror


Opera Releases Stable FreeBSD Browser

1nsane0ne writes "The Register is reporting that Opera has released a production FreeBSD version. It appears to have fixed some of the problems that I found in a few hours of playing around with the betas and will be interesting to test a bit more."

9 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. Re:My Obligation by Dannon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since they've got Opera now, it'll be a little while longer. At least until the fat lady sings.

    --
    Good judgment comes from experience.
    Experience comes from bad judgment.
  2. Re:My Obligation by dacarr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Opera has an OS/2 version. You figure it out.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  3. Good to hear by Helmholtz+Coil · · Score: 5, Informative

    Very good to hear. I love my FreeBSD desktop dearly, and one of the last ties I had to enabling Linux compatibility was a release version of Opera. So far I have yet to find a better combination of

    • low-profile,
    • high speed, and
    • functionality
    in a single browser. Most of the other browsers I've come across were of the "choose any one of the above" variety. I've found niche uses for all of them, but Opera was the best choice on a old P75 for me.
    1. Re:Good to hear by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 5, Informative

      It *IS* available in the ports tree. Has been for several weeks. /usr/ports/www/opera It's currently at 6.10 B1, though. Expect an update shortly to 6.10.

  4. Re:Jesus christ - front page and nine replies so f by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Who would think that a dead browser... "

    Define dead. Percentage-wise, IE is the only browsezr that's alive.

    Somehow they've found money to keep developing new versions of Opera, so I wouldn't be so quick to call it 'dead'.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  5. The real news by schussat · · Score: 5, Informative
    The real news here isn't simply that the BSD version of Opera 6.1 has been released, but that 6.1 is now available generally for Linux -- both i*86 and PowerPC platforms. This is a really significant development, and it means that, as of right now, the Linux version of Opera is now at a higher release number than for Windows (which is at 6.05 right now). The Opera folks are really moving on Linux development.

    -schussat

    --
    The hour of noon has passed. Let us go and get some Kentucky Fried Chicken.
  6. Re:My Obligation by OzJimbob · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Too true. My boss at the ISP I sysadmin at started insisting 6 months ago that we use FreeBSD on every machine instead of Linux. And I recently switched my own web server over to FreeBSD and haven't looked back. While Linux is making in-roads on the desktop with distros like Lycoris, FreeBSD is where it's at if you want a plain, powerful unix server environment. But then, now that software like Opera is available, FreeBSD is becoming more usable on the desktop as well!

    --
    -"I still believe in revolution; I just don't capitalize it anymore." - srini!
  7. I'm amazed Opera did that by bogie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Feel free to chalk this up as a "BSD is dead post", but considering how few people use linux as a desktop, there must be 10 times less BSD desktop users. Really I'm not trying to troll, but there are just not nearly as many bsd desktop users as there are linux ones.

    That said I'm surprised Opera would port for that small a user base, especially considering its a payware browser. I guess the same could have been said for Beos which never had a large user base.

    Anyway good for Opera. Its too bad the other 99.999% of Desktop ISV's out there ignore any linux or nix, that isn't OSX. I keep waiting money in hand, but year after year they never come, Sigh.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:I'm amazed Opera did that by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      there must be 10 times less BSD desktop users

      Your probably right, but you know what? I'm glad developers don't always pay attention to things like that, because if they did Windows would be the only OS with any support what-so-ever. I'd dare say 95% of all desktop machines run Windows, if not more. So by your logic, supporting Linux or Mac OSX is a waste of time.

      I happen to personally really like FreeBSD.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.