Slashdot Mirror
International Space Station Turns Two
RedWolves2 writes "Today is ISS's second anniversary of Operations. Two years ago today NASA astronaut Bill Shepherd and Russian cosmonauts Yuri Gidzenko and Sergei Krikalev first boarded the ISS. In two years the station has grown to more then 200,000 pounds and has had 112 visitors."
N*SYNC free since november 2000!
Its a shame it won't last...
You can't take the sky from me...
...and still the people of Earth cannot tell the difference between then and than.
What we need is links describing what they7 are going to DO with it. Im not saying its useless but i dont know much about it but am interested.
unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
I thought Slashdot posted a story about my ex-girlfriend.
http://heavens-above.com/ has location-based information about the flight path of the ISS, among other things. Worth a visit.
"There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
Station: World peace?
Astronaut David A. Wolf: Heh. Yeah, right.
Station: Well.... how about understanding between all peoples and religions?
Wolf: Damn programmers. Filthy hippies.
Station: An end to social injustice?
Wolf: Those pinko bastards programmed you for that! Disregard it!
Station: Could you tell everyone that a sentient computer in orbit has found aliens and carries a message of peace and love from the cosmos?
Wolf: We'd be a laughing stock! Look, why don't you ask for something that we can give you up here, right now?
Station: I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
Wolf: Uh-oh.
The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
At least at one point in 2001, NASA estimated America's portion of the ISS cost to be US$100bn (i.e. how much America will have spent when the station is completed). Let's suppose nasa is wrong, and that it is actually triple that, US$300bn.
GW Bush's propsed 2003 military budget is US$378bn, which is something like US$43bn more than last year.
And what do we have to show for our military spending? We successfully (?) bombed Serbia during peace-time. The Pentagon couldn't even protect itself from relatively slow-moving passenger aircraft, even when given a 30 minute warning. We bombed the hell out of Afghanistan, including first aid warehouses and wedding parties, and it appears that terrorist organizations still have the upper hand.
At least with the space station there are many nations *talking* and *cooperating* to at least some extent. That is, ISS does much more to make friends than the B2 stealth bomber does.
Why do we spend so much money to protect ourselves from enemies when making friends is so cheap? I think the ISS is a damn good investment.
-Paul Komarek
The above is a common misconception. Richard Zubrin's Mars Direct proposal shows how to send humans to mars without the ISS. Of course, ISS keeps earthbound contractors fat, and happy.
If Bill Clinton had done his job as President, the attacks on the US would not have happened (at least not in 2001). Bill Clinton drastically cut the US military budget. It will take years for the military to recover from that. Thus, it is outrageous for you to blame Bush's 2003 budget for the 2001 attack.
While it is true that $270 billion is drastically less than $380 billion, it does not necessarily follow that $270 billion is insufficient.
Unless it can be demonstrated that another $100 billion would have prevented the destruction of the towers, the point stands.
George's current buget is simply the most recent figure in a long line of military bugets that can best be summarized by the word "large". I think you read too much into the fact that the quoted value was for the current budget.
The enemies of Democracy are
"player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
you have some incredibly ignorant, right-wing views, my friend. i suggest travelling outside the US and reading some books instead of swallowing CNN and US propaganda.
i lived in denmark for 6 months - it describes itself as a "socialist democracy", which could be best paraphrased as "we look after the people first". seriously, you do not see the poverty and crummy state of civil infrastructure that are commonplace in certain parts of the states, you just don't. everyone has automatic access to health care, noone starves on the streets, violent crime is incredibly low. how is that bad?
the US spends more money on defense than the next 9 in the top ten list combined. i would think that equitable access to healthcare is more important than having the most bombs, wouldn't you agree?