Slashdot Mirror


No Windows Allowed On Ex-Battleship Cruise Liner

uucee writes "Wired has a story on an ex-warship cum cruise ship. Owner of the ship, Doug Humphrey, on why no Windows aboard his ship: 'We didn't want to have viruses blowing up systems that we depend on for navigation and monitoring engines and other systems. And since nothing seems to be able to stop all of these Windows viruses, the best way to win is to just stop using Windows.' However, it's not clear why Mac programmers can be trusted more than Windows programmers to keep a ship running: USS Yorktown was brought to a halt not by a virus but by bad coding: divide-by-zero. As Windows viruses don't travel through 'the ether,' it's also unclear how mission-critical systems, properly cut off from the outside world, would become infected in the first place."

84 comments

  1. First post? by handsomepete · · Score: 5, Funny

    They didn't have Windows on the ship because sailors kept opening them and getting all their stuff wet. Ta da!

    (So long, karma.)

    1. Re:First post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't there some Polish Navy joke about windows as well?

      Or...

      Why does the new Italian Navy have glass-bottomed boats?

      To see the old Italian Navy!

  2. No windows? by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 5, Funny

    But then how do they see where they're going?

    --

    --sdem
    1. Re:No windows? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      through the portholes?

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    2. Re:No windows? by KillerKane · · Score: 1

      Obligatory "That's about as funny as a screen door in a submarine" gag.

      Sorry. I won't do it again. Really.

      --
      There is a thin line between genius and insanity. I have erased that line. -- Oscar Levant
  3. FUD? by cornice · · Score: 2

    Well if the general public is going to base purchase desisions on half truths, marketing BS and FUD then at least this should give them a hint of balance.

    1. Re:FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to you, who does years of research and comparative analysis to ensure that you have taken the correct decsion every time you buy a tin of beans.

      What ar arrogant cocksure individual you must be; glad you don't make any purchasing decisions in my company.

  4. Whatever by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) This is a coastal patrol boat with a 40 mm cannon and two machine guns. It isn't remotely a "battleship".

    2) The owner doesn't mention the Yorktown incident at all. Given the way it's constantly, erroneously invoked here, I'm surprised this is the story picked in which to debunk it.

    3) So, somebody with a fairly sketchy understanding of computers made a billion by selling his startup to someone else before it cratered. It's been a while since people like that were a novety worth expending thought on.

    1. Re:Whatever by doughumphrey · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some friends said I might want to get in here and correct factual errors, and clarify what we are really trying to do. It's my warship, and I'll do what I wanna ;-) Seriously, it is mine, so I can answer questions on it. 1) it isn't remotely a battleship You got that right - we run it with a crew of 4, you can't do that with a battlewagon. It is a coastal patrol boat, 120ft long, 24ft wide, draws 2 meters of water (yes, it is british, and NATO compliant, which means that there are mixed english/metric measures EVERYWHERE on it. Mine has not 40mm gun on the back deck - a much more mundane but much more useful Seacrane 200 is on there for picking up large items on and off the rear deck. There are mounts for .30 cals (1919's or M60 if it was in the US navy, something in .303 british if in the Royal Navy) There are 2 mounts, one per side, on the upper deck for heavy machine guns, likely the ever popular M2HB .50 cal 2) The Yorktown thing is none of my concern per se - I don't need any extra evidence that windoze is a threat - I have owned companies with many employees and many windows boxes. Evidence abounds. 3) If you are talking to me, I do not have a "fairly sketchy knowledge of computers. I have written PDP-10 code, PDP-11 code, Suns (my first was a 2/120), Vax, and have done IP networking since NCP was around. No, I don't hack code now, but I am pretty well versed on the technology, and on the current state of the security art (my current focus is deep packet scanning - not sure I really BELIEVE in it, but there is a lot of work going on in the area) You don't always have to check your brain at the door to make money, and YOU should be more carefull before making the assumption that someone who owns a strage toy like this might not understand networking. Doug Humphrey doug@joss.com

    2. Re:Whatever by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doug, if you have your navigation and engine systems connected to a network and to the internet you are in for some trouble. Especially now that everyone knows about your boat. If you are going to brag about your secure computing solution to the world--well, at least get a set-up that has security as a major focus.

      A Mac isn't that hard to crack--all it takes is one hax0R getting offended, and then sailing your boat to Antartica.

    3. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Doug,

      If you weren't aware of it before, you probably know it by now. Anything interesting or useful that rears its head on Slashdot will likely be ripped to shreds by what has quickly become the nets most vicious and petty peanut gallery.

      Slashdottians know nothing, they accomplish nothing, and their opinions are worth nothing. They are uniformly bitter, small-minded geeks who overestimate their own importance and their own skillz. They are, for the most part, losers. Their biggest accomplishment is in insulting others' spelling and grammar, attacking the GPL license despite their grade level understanding of it, and tricking people into clicking on goatse.cx links. They are know-it-all blowhards who use their computers primarily for Pornography and online gaming, at which they cheat regularly to offset their complete lack of motor skills.

      Despite touting the wonderous greatness of linux and open source, they all use Windows and Internet Explorer. They like Macs because of OSX, but want it to run on X86 so they can steal a copy and give nothing back. They will eventually buy a Mac due to their inability to run Windows without crashing it constantly by their own stupidity, and become raving unbalanced lunatics who do more harm than good for the Mac community by claiming that the G4 is quadruple the speed of a dual 3Ghz Xeon box.

      They lie about their own experience to make their case, and when you win an argument with them, they post anonymously in order to tell you they've had sex with your mother.

      Don't become a regular here, you will become retarded.

      Signed,
      Yoda the Retard

    4. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Takes one to know one.... Go here softcock...

    5. Re:Whatever by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      :grin:

      And it took YEARS for anyone to win the Hack-a-Mac contest. That person then refused to have their name public (for obvious reasons).

      Oh sure, anything is hackable but, you are talking about something here that is probably behind a Firewall and two probably has little turned on in the way of servers/services to the outside..

    6. Re:Whatever by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      I'm interested although others here might try to shred afterwards.

      I hope you used a Firewall and didn't turn on many services that are connected to the outside.

      That and configured TCPwrappers on the OS X boxes as well as iffw (in 10.2 there is an interface to it in System Preferences).

      You probably did but, I'm concerned as there are all these frothing at the mouth types here.

    7. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just became my personal hero.

    8. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! You got me again!

      Ohh, you sneaky Slashdotters!

      Grrrrr!

    9. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wanted to tell you that I've had sex with your mother.

    10. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, wait, sorry, that was *MY* mother.

    11. Re:Whatever by thevulcan · · Score: 1

      This is quite possibly the most intelligent post ever. You have hit the nail on the head. Now if only you could hit most of the Slashdottian horde on the head...

  5. Submission errors/comments by psyconaut · · Score: 4, Informative

    (1) It's not a battleship, it was a patrol ship....quite a small one at that.

    (2) It's not used as a "cruise ship" now -- it's the personal vessel of an entrepreneur.

    (3) As for how viruses would have gotten aboard (because they don't "travel through the ether") -- the ship has satellite Internet and is hooked-up to DSL when moored.

    All that said, it's an ugly fsck'ing boat that dude's got!

    -psy

    1. Re:Submission errors/comments by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

      Dude, that boat looks bad ass. Even without the guns.

      --
      I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
  6. What are you smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    However, it's not clear why Mac programmers can be trusted more than Windows programmers to keep a ship running: USS Yorktown was brought to a halt no by a virus but by bad coding: divide-by-zero.

    What are you trying to do, piss off as many people at once as you can? The Yorkton may have been "bad programming" but it was NT and not a Mac. In fact there was nothing to do with Macs and the Yorkton.

    "My brother was hit by and Audi last year, so I don't see why I should trust all those Ford cars to be safe"

  7. Now that is a troll! [nt] by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 1

    There is no text here. That's what the [nt] means. The filter obviously doesn't like it though.

    --
    Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
  8. I have to say... by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We didn't want to have viruses blowing up systems that we depend on for navigation and monitoring engines and other systems."

    It's note-worthy that this is not a military vessle anymore. Unless I'm reading the article wrong, this boat is a glorified private yacht. I fail to see the importance of the whole issue from this perspective.

    I can see the ads now...

    "My name is Doug Humphrey, and I'm a rich bastard who downsized my company and bought a disused warship-turned-yacht for my own private use!"

    Good for him. Worried about your navigation systems? Get a stand-alone GPS unit (Assuming the Royal navy stripped out the navigation equipment that the ship originally had, that is, which I'm sure didn't run Windows!). And I'm sure an engine room in a ship like that still requires a trained engineer and at least one assistant to operate.

    The only 'critical system' I can imagine on that ship that could possibly rely on the stablility of an OS is his stock-market update streamer.

    Now... if anything, the interesting story here is how they converted his *company* to use Macs, and is supposingly saving the firm a bunch of money on maintainance. That's something to talk about. Now we can have a meaningful discussion on the Mac vs. Windows situation in the business world.

    =Smidge=

    1. Re:I have to say... by doughumphrey · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is just a private vessel now - nothing official. You can get barebones GPS things with no real OS but we have more sophisticated things for charts and maps, and also we are doing stuff that monitors equipment. Still, really critical things like radar, radios and basic GPS nav have nothing to do with external connections - we are not fools ;-) As to how we got the company to go all Mac, and the evidence that it saves a bundle, that is pretty easy. When you are downsizing things, you don't have the luxury of a big MIS staff - sales people like PC's rather than Macs, but if there is nobody to fix the PCs they are all dead in a few weeks. The Macs are more simple, and they get the job done. Seriously, the only complaints we got were that the games didn't run on the Macs. Boo Hoo. Doug

    2. Re:I have to say... by ZxCv · · Score: 1

      Nice boat.

      Gotta spare G4 lying around? ;-)

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    3. Re:I have to say... by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you do have one nice boat.

      Now if I could afford something like that...

    4. Re:I have to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now if I could afford something like that..." ...then you probably wouldn't give a d@mn what lemkebeth had to say about it.

    5. Re:I have to say... by Tug3 · · Score: 1
      I won't comment on the relativeness of the original article, but just a couple of points about "the real world".

      Get a stand-alone GPS unit (Assuming the Royal navy stripped out the navigation equipment that the ship originally had, that is, which I'm sure didn't run Windows!). And I'm sure an engine room in a ship like that still requires a trained engineer and at least one assistant to operate.

      While GPS and radar units themselves have nothing to do with Windows or PCs. But instead navigation systems unfortunately quite often do. I'm talking about a complete system with autohelm, mapping and the lot integrated.
      I was working on the bridge of a passanger creise ship just after the modernisation of the bridge. The minute we passed out of the harbour the PC systems went nuts. 5 buzzers started screaming at the same time, and the main display of the system gave an unfriendly error while slave displays only froze. I wont write here what the comments were onboard, as there might be kids reading this. Anyway, the solution was easy. Go to manual and rip out all the cables going to that damn PC. (No time to try out nice ways to shut it down...)
      So, we did that trip with manual helm and no maplines on the radars, otherwise everything else was back to normal. But the call the skipper gave to the company that sold the equipment was quite hilarious to hear. I've never heard anyone insult someone over the phone that badly...

      And a note about engineering too. While most newer small cargo vessels (under 150m), and some bigger new ones too, run with E0 (engineering zero) it doesn't mean you could do it (cheaply) with an old warboat. It is quite possible to run a ship with only one person on watch. All the alarms are linked to the bridge and there is a separate engines monitor for the (deck)officer on watch. But you do need an engineer on stand by (at cabin) to fix the problems. But as I said, its a question of money only... ...I don't know how much of the old warboat is left on that cruiser? Is it just a hull with all new gadgets refitted or just minor modifications with interface to the new computer gear?

      Although I would be interested to hear what navigation software they use on that boat? I do have Macs myselft and would like to use them for navigation too, but until now I've only fount PC software...
      --
      If all else fails, pull the plug and get out...
      The Life is out there...
    6. Re:I have to say... by doughumphrey · · Score: 1

      we are using MacSea which has all the scanned in charts for charting/plotting - works about as good as the windows packages. we feed it with many sources of data - gps/dgps, gyro, flux gayes, loran-C so we notice when DoD plays with GPS accuracy ;-) we are still researching data collection software doug

  9. eh by Ecko_viLAn · · Score: 1, Troll

    "... the only complaints were from people who couldn't play games on their machines any longer. So sorry, no games at work. We are so mean...I don't play computer games so that might help explain why I don't miss the Windows box." I didn't know only windows had computer games... chris.

    --
    If we don't end war, War will end us. - H.G. Wells
  10. "the owner of the ship." by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2

    you know, it doesn't need to be clear. it's his ship, he can use whatever rules he wants. seems like pretty wise rules really.

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    1. Re:"the owner of the ship." by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

      That's right. I'm a god at sea! (props to Vinnie Vingara)

  11. Keeping Out Viruses the Easy Way by MBCook · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why don't they just isolate the network that the ship's computers are on (the important ones like navigation) from all other computers. Don't connect it to the internet. And have every computer on it locked down, take out disk drives/etc. It would be very hard to get a virus that way, and you could run whatever you want for an OS.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Keeping Out Viruses the Easy Way by doughumphrey · · Score: 1, Informative

      why don't they just isolate the network that the ship's computers are on..... this works well in theory, but since there are a number of people working on the systems, networks, etc. there is the possibility that they will get exposed to the outside world (internet access is a requirement because I use it for my day job(s) and guests like to have access too. Better to take an active role in maintaining security than to simply count on nobody plugging the wrong rj45 into the wrong place. Or I could turn IPSEC on and just break everything..... ;-) I can not assure that guests will not bring on dirty machines - that would be real friendly, taking their laptops and examining them... Doug

  12. Games by Daleks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "We forced everyone to go to Macs for the desktops," he said. "The support load dropped to almost nothing and the only complaints were from people who couldn't play games on their machines any longer. So sorry, no games at work. We are so mean."

    "I've used Macs for the last six years," he said. "I had a PC before that, but Macs were fun and more reliable. I don't play computer games so that might help explain why I don't miss the Windows box."

    "We avoid the Windows operating system since it is such a huge security risk," he explained. "We didn't want to have viruses blowing up systems that we depend on for navigation and monitoring engines and other systems. And since nothing seems to be able to stop all of these Windows viruses, the best way to win is to just stop using Windows."

    Two paragraphs noting that Mac's don't have as many games, and one noting that Mac's are more secure that Windows machines. If I hadn't read the Slashdot headline I would've thought this article was about a game-hating sailor.

    1. Re:Games by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      If you read the Wired article you would see that is not the case.

      The Slashdot submitter was itching to start a flamewar or something.

    2. Re:Games by Daleks · · Score: 1

      If you read the Wired article you would see that is not the case.

      Er... I quoted from the article. I obviously read it.

    3. Re:Games by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      Not entriely true.

      There was lots of misleading commentary in the Slashdot submission.

      Like, "battleship", "cruise", etc.

      It was designed to start a flamewar.

      Now the actual article on Wired, is quite a bit different than the submitter makes it out to be.

  13. Pre-infected by aminorex · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    > it's also unclear how mission-critical systems,
    > properly cut off from the outside world, would
    > become infected in the first place."

    They come pre-infected from the vendor. Infected
    with backdoors. E.g. the proliferating IIS
    vulnerabilities, just one of which allowed
    Code Red and Nimda to own the Internet for
    over a year now. E.g. the NSA backdoor Kerberos
    keys. E.g. SP3 and Media Player auto-install
    "features". Infected also with DOS modes. E.g.
    Media Player DRM.

    Who needs viruses to make the platform unstable
    and unreliable? The vendor does a good enough
    job, in this case.

    Oh, and then there's the issue of real-time
    mission-critical response. What is the peak
    interrupt latency of a Windoes 2000 Adv Server
    system? What is it for an up-to-date Mach or
    Linux system? Clue: With Windows it is effectively
    unlimited. With Linux, it is measured in
    microseconds. With Mach it is measured in
    milliseconds.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    1. Re:Pre-infected by Jon+Peterson · · Score: 2

      Whoa, dude, it's time for your medicine.

      Just what is a 'real-time mission-critical response'? Last I checked 'mission-critical' didn't _actually_ mean anything.

      Also, I suppose it is just possible that Win2K has a _theoretical_ unlimited interrupt latency, but I don't think it is _effectively_ unlimited, because otherwise I wouldn't be able to do anything on my computer, would I?

      Also, who gives a shit? Did anyone say Win2K was a real-time system? Did they? Is anyone claiming that Linux makes a good kernel for a real-time OS?

      Finally, last I checked, boats need computers about as much as computers need, oh, I dunno, boats probably. Funnily enough navigating a boat isn't actually a 'real-time' operation, and while I daresay firing a guided AA missile is, I don't think anyone is really interested in whether Windows or Linux is a better OS for missile guidance systems, since they are both obviously not going to be used for it.

      end rant.

      *waves goodbye to some karma*

      --
      ----- .sig: file not found
    2. Re:Pre-infected by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

      Which part of "properly cut off from the outside world" you didn't understand ?

      Most if not all of the items you listed are more or less meaningless on a non-networked, isolated system.

    3. Re:Pre-infected by J'raxis · · Score: 1
      Also, I suppose it is just possible that Win2K has a _theoretical_ unlimited interrupt latency, but I don't think it is _effectively_ unlimited, because otherwise I wouldn't be able to do anything on my computer, would I?
      What that means is that one process can take complete control and prevent any interrupts from being handled. Thus, the latency for the next interrupt to arrive could be unlimited.
    4. Re:Pre-infected by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Oh, and then there's the issue of real-time
      mission-critical response.


      Yeah, just in case his boat gets an upgrade that lets it go faster than 30 knots, eh?

      I'm sure a boat that's been around since 1970 will find Win2000 plenty fast for "mission critical" things (like releasing the anchor, maybe).

    5. Re:Pre-infected by statusbar · · Score: 2
      • Clue: With Windows it is effectively unlimited. With Linux, it is measured in microseconds. With Mach it is measured in milliseconds.

      Actually, no. Win 2000 can schedule a real time thread in kernel space, triggered by a hardware interrupt, much faster than the current stock linux kernels can.

      With RTLinux, Low-Latency Linux, and the O(1) linux scheduler patches, linux becomes usable for hard-real-time uses. Without them, it is not! Real-time is what I do, and until these patches came out, Linux was very dissapointed for people wanting to use Linux in embedded systems.

      --jeff++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    6. Re:Pre-infected by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      the point is that win2k(and xp) can still get to it's knees and start barking. (yes, it can stay up for weeks, but, can still fail, i've had funny things happen, like missing the first draw of nearly all menus, taskbar going wild, some unknown process , or known one, taking all the cpu and being unable to kill it because windows says it's under debugging).

      booting the comp does count as significant delay i'd suspect, as something started will never finish.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  14. Time to raid Microsoft by anarkhos · · Score: 1

    It's clearly a terrorist organiztion!

    --
    >80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent
    >life
  15. The hits just keep on coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    cum cruise ship.

    Oh come on, some people go cruising for the uhh.. uhhh.. well, I'm sure people go cruising for other reasons.

  16. what I want to know is... by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1, Interesting

    how are they using a satellite connection without going through a PC running Windows? Every report I see at DSLReports.com indicate that there is no way to connect directly to a Mac (or linux). You need Windows to do the ICS because there are no Mac/linux drivers for the satellite modems available.

    1. Re:what I want to know is... by doughumphrey · · Score: 2, Informative

      how are they using satellite comm without going through a pc.... ? not using consumer gear - there are inmarsat systems that are dedicated hardware - there is a realtime os in there, but not windoze. connection is 10baseT. doug

    2. Re:what I want to know is... by zulux · · Score: 2

      Hmmm...

      My Iridium connects very nicely to my Psion Revo (EPOC/Symbian OS). The Iridium phone looks like a slow AT command-set modem to the Psion.

      With the Psion and Iridium - I can shh while anywhere in the world, and the whole pacakge is less than 3.5 pounds.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    3. Re:what I want to know is... by skinfitz · · Score: 2

      With the Psion and Iridium - I can shh while anywhere in the world, and the whole pacakge is less than 3.5 pounds.

      ...per minute if the last satellite phone charges I saw on a bill were correct!

    4. Re:what I want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consumer level satellite broadband isn't the only game in town. There are plenty of other satellite services if you are willing to pay for them.

    5. Re:what I want to know is... by zulux · · Score: 2

      Iridium is cheep now - $1.50 a minuit ~1.60 Euros. The high use plans can get down to $1.00 a min.

      It's cheaper for me to use my Iridium phone in Europe to call the US, then it is to use a GSM phone. $1.50 vs $2.75

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    6. Re:what I want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you must believe in Windows being the only OS supporting wireless multi-buttons mice too...

      LOL M$ really is successful in brainwashing its users with lots of FUDs

    7. Re:what I want to know is... by glenmark · · Score: 3, Informative

      Read the article. The guy owns a company that provides broadband access via satellite. You can certainly connect a Mac to such services (the sat modem just looks like a router), but most companies that provide that service are just too lazy to provide config scripts for platforms other than windows.

      --
      *** Quantum Mechanics: The Dreams of Which Stuff is Made ***
  17. Link to the ship's home page by ckd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Welcome Aboard the Badtz Maru! has more photos and details of her history.

    1. Re:Link to the ship's home page by red_dragon · · Score: 2

      What? Badtz Maru is a ship?? I thought it was that little penguin-like critter from Sanrio.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
  18. From company website: Brief history of internet by oboeaaron · · Score: 1

    Found this on his company's website (http://www.cidera.com/):

    The Internet: A Brief Timeline
    1968 ARPA--the Advanced Research Projects Agency--contracts for the Arpanet, a network of linked computers for the military and also academia.

    1975 The first do-it-yourself computer kit: the Altair 8800.

    1989 The World Wide Web is born.

    2000 Worldwide users on the Internet exceed 300 million.

    Yeah, I'd say that pretty much sums it up ;-)

    --
    Journey onward.
  19. Unclear? by rebill · · Score: 4, Interesting
    it's also unclear how mission-critical systems, properly cut off from the outside world, would become infected in the first place

    That's easy - unless the machine is unplugged, sealed in cement and at teh bottom of the ocean, *someone* is going to bring his special program from him and will install it on the box.

    Unless you post a guard on every box at all times, someone is going to play with it and screw it up.

    Or steal it. One guy was so brazen that he came into a training class, and removed RAM from the machines while the class was going on. We found out about it a little while later when the person giving the class called us to ask when were were going to send the guy back to "finish working on the machines."

    "Uh, what guy?"

    "The guy that you sent out, earlier!"

    "We didn't send anyone out . . ."

    The point is, with 5000 employees in a manufacturing plant, we had the occasional problem where one of our critical systems would drop off-line because someone wanted to plug in their coffee machine, or play his solitaire on OS/2, or decided that they really wanted to chill down their alcohol in that nice, air-conditioned cabinet during the summr months . . . and Cruise Ships will have that many employees. All it takes is *ONE* idiot, and you end up in the press . . .

    --

    Chivalry is not dead, it's just frequently misspelt. - M. Langley

  20. Hold on a minute... by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

    Wired has a story on an ex-warship cum cruise ship.

    Whoa, hold on! Did you just say "cum cruise ship"? Can I get a ticket?

  21. READ THE FREAKIN STORY!!! by SensitiveMale · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Here is the BIG REASON!

    When the firm underwent a drastic downsizing recently, he moved his entire staff to Macs because it was too expensive keeping a fleet of Windows machines shipshape.


    "We forced everyone to go to Macs for the desktops," he said. "The support load dropped to almost nothing and the only complaints were from people who couldn't play games on their machines any longer.



    I expect slashdot reader to comment on the story before reading it, but shouldn't the SUBMITTER read it first?

    1. Re:READ THE FREAKIN STORY!!! by Zane+Edwards · · Score: 1

      Send a memo to gameless ship mates

      Um, and don't forgetsolitaire

  22. Apple switch ad? by btornado · · Score: 1, Funny
    "We avoid the Windows operating system since it is such a huge security risk," he explained. "We didn't want to have viruses blowing up systems that we depend on for navigation and monitoring engines and other systems. And since nothing seems to be able to stop all of these Windows viruses, the best way to win is to just stop using Windows."

    Man this entire story would make a good Apple switch ad :).

    1. Re:Apple switch ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never seen Doug... Not the kind of guy you want sporting your product on a multination ad.

  23. Navy carrier to run Win 2000 by burnsy · · Score: 1
    Navy carrier to run Win 2000

    Newport News Shipbuilding is constructing CVN 77, a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, for the Navy in Newport News, Va. In January (2000), the shipbuilder chose Lockheed Martin Corp. to develop the carrier's integrated warfare systems, said Jerri Fuller Dickseski, a company spokeswoman. Lockheed Martin officials chose Microsoft for the project.

    1. Re:Navy carrier to run Win 2000 by KillerKane · · Score: 1

      Anyone know any reliable contractors who have experience building bomb shelters? Just asking.

      --
      There is a thin line between genius and insanity. I have erased that line. -- Oscar Levant
    2. Re:Navy carrier to run Win 2000 by doughumphrey · · Score: 1

      There are so many systems on a modern warship - some are not all that important (inventory for the commisary for example) and some are life and death (aiming for the SeaWiz which, if wrong, could result in one ship hosing another with 20mm rounds) Clearly your OS requirements are different on those. I would not mind WinWhatever doing the former, but I expect that it will not be in charge of the later. Embedded control systems are good in that they can be more reliably verified and then NOT altered. One of many problems of having a commonly available OS doing this kind of work is the possibility of contamination from the "commercial" world by someone who doesn't know better and decides to update a file or two from their laptop or other non-vetted source. doug

    3. Re:Navy carrier to run Win 2000 by BWJones · · Score: 2

      One of many problems of having a commonly available OS doing this kind of work is the possibility of contamination from the "commercial" world by someone who doesn't know better and decides to update a file or two from their laptop or other non-vetted source.

      And actually, this happens more often than not. When you consider that many corporations tend to suffer "corporate Alzheimer's" on projects as people involved with them turn over or the jobs are contracted out, you often can have functionality losses in your software that may go un-noticed for a while and sometimes its too late to fix it. For instance, when Microsoft decided to get their own version of Excel for Windows (after Excel/multiplan for the Macintosh was contracted), there was a wonderful feature that allowed you to retain linking with graphs and the data in your tables. At some point in Office 95 or 97 (I can't remember which), this functionality was lost with the recompiling and it has never come back.

      Unfortuantely, there is a movement within the US Navy to migrate most systems including command and contol to Windows despite the concerns for security and stability that many seem to be voicing. Granted, there are "trusted" versions around, but they are not as stable as UNIX OS's (which also have trusted versions).

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    4. Re:Navy carrier to run Win 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, Microsoft is a significant investor in Newport News Shipbuilding. You'd expect the company to chose another computer vendor?

    5. Re:Navy carrier to run Win 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why the Navy people keep having accidents with their equipment. At least in the Air Force, we use Suns

  24. the headline says.... by KarateBob · · Score: 0

    On the Slashdot page, the headline says no Windows machines are allowed onboard, but the article says only Mac's onboard.

    Does this mean you can't bring on PC's with linux? But you can bring on Mac's with linux on it? Technically it would still be a Mac, but without the Mac OS.

    I Wonder if you can bring Pocket PC's on....they run on a form of Windows.

    1. Re:the headline says.... by doughumphrey · · Score: 1

      to be clear 1) we don't care about hardware platforms - only microsoft OS and some appliceions (exchange comes to mind) are not allowed on the LAN that links machines that are involved in the operations of the ship. That part of the net is also NOT connected to the internet. 2) guests can bring whatever they want to use on-board, any OS any hardware. They can have access to the internet too. That would be the "unclean" or "uncleared" part of the network. doug

  25. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats funny

  26. Pirating ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if he ever runs amuck on the see will pirating finally become a big problem for apple ? :-)

  27. goddammit timothy... by BiOFH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What the fuck is that all about? Half the facts in the headline are wrong (battleship, cruise liner, yadda yadda) and then you strike off on a tangent that's just plain inflammatory and, from the looks of it, shows off your ignorance of closed system infections.

    Argh! I've so had it with this bullshit. Slashdot has become incredibly unreliable. You guys fucking lie in your headlines (let's call it what it is.. it's no merely "inaccurate", it's fucking lying for the sake of sensationalism) and then just go on about your business when half your [huge] readership makes note of it.

    ARGH! I defy you [Slashdot editorial staff] to address this issue. I defy you. Go ahead... prove that you all aren't the true 'anonymous' cowards hiding behind your 'code of silence'.

    Headline: Slashdot makes shit up just for shits and giggles. Facts secondary to inflaming the masses.

    --
    - I am made of meat.
    1. Re:goddammit timothy... by denzombie · · Score: 1

      Headline: Slashdot makes shit up just for shits and giggles. Facts secondary to inflaming the masses.

      Yeah, sure.
      But, if they didn't what would you have to post?

      Thanks Timothy for another timely and informative /. article.

      Kinda takes all the fun out of it.

      --
      --- Evil robots don't kill people, Mad scientists kill people.
  28. Wargames... by mshiltonj · · Score: 3, Funny

    And since nothing seems to be able to stop all of these Windows viruses, the best way to win is to just stop using Windows.

    The immediately brought to mind a line from the old Wargames movie: "Strange game: the only winning move is not to play."

  29. Those Were Words of Wisdom by oscarmv · · Score: 2

    If it weren't too long for it, your entire post would become my sig. I think I'll make a poster out of it or something to the effect ;P

  30. Moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey dumbass he's not cutoff from the world due to a satellite connection. You can have all the security you want but a half-ass operating system is going to let stuff through every time. If you had even the faintest idea of security architectures, firewalls, and applications you would kow that. Also this boat is the size of a life boat on a battleship. What an ignoramus you are.

  31. Portholes. by Governerd · · Score: 1

    Funny, yet true. There are no actual windows on a ship, nor are there doors -- only "hatches," etc.

  32. Ha! by sparkleytone · · Score: 2, Funny

    So like, I was gonna fire my cannon and stuff....and my ship started going BEEEBEEPBEEEPBLIPBEEEP...and I missed. Then I had to try and shoot again but it wasn't as good...cuz I was dead. It was kind of....a bummer.

  33. connected or not by Chickxsy · · Score: 1

    According to the article :

    They have satelite uplink to the internet.

    So they can get viruses.

  34. It's simple by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    Now repeat after me: Stupid shit happens. Sure you're only supposed to trust tested and validated CDs from reputable places. Sure that's the way it's supposed to happen. Aren't all CDs from Microsoft trusted? Surely they wouldn't let a virus slip out their door on one of their own CDs. If you think that you're wrong. Microsoft distributed copies of Visual Studio .Net that were infected by Nimda! Companies do dumb shit. IT workers don't always scan incoming media for viruses on isolated machines. Weird shit happens. Dumb shit happens. Eliminating one of the most common conductors of the effects of dumb shit makes sense.