Slashdot Mirror
Mozilla: The Good And The Bad
Rui del-Negro writes "According to this article at The Register, six security flaws in Mozilla were posted to BugTraq last weekend. They have not been added to the official Mozilla vulnerability list yet. But details can be found here, here, here and here (phew!).
Finally, two other bugs were found, relating to loading GIF files (in several Linux browsers) and Mozilla's (JavaScript) implementation of onUnload ( ).
Are they trying to prove they can beat Microsoft at their own game..? Or is someone just trying to win a prize?" On a brighter note, Zerbey writes "From Neil's Place here is 101 Things Mozilla can do which IE cannot. Very interesting reading and an excellent resource for convincing stubborn Internet Explorer users why they should switch. This article was also reported at Mozillazine. I'm still waiting for NTLM auth to be implemented so we can switch over at my workplace, the only reason we still have to use Internet Explorer."
They're open about it? It's not the official vulnerability page yet. Man, they're so honest, when does the honesty end? I'm up to my ass in honesty over here.
Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
Flamebait, whatever. All a lot of you do is whine, whine, and whine some more. Get over yourselves.
It's getting a bit sad, really. There is a little more to the world (and technology for that matter) than complaining about one company's product.
this is nuts. mozilla isint important to warrant 2 articles a day. it isint going anywhere soon
Blame it on ElGeeko De Generico [generic geek]
The majority of computer users already uses a standards compliant browser. Its called Internet Explorer. When over 97% percent of the internet using population uses one browser, it BECOMES the standard. Whatever that crusty old academic group, the WC3 consortium comes up with matters anymore. Mozilla is actually the one not in compliance.
Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
Opera, maybe? :-)