Posted by
michael
on from the things-THEY-don't-want-you-to-know dept.
redbaron7 writes "The BBC is
reporting that NASA has cancelled plans for a book to challenge the Moon Hoax Conspiracy Theory, due to criticism. No doubt the cancellation of this book will be listed as further "evidence" that the landings were fake."
Re:I KNEW IT!!!
by
DaveAtFraud
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Elvis, I told you to keep quiet. Now get back to Graceland before somebody notices that you're not dead. If you're good, we'll borrow one of the black helicopters and slip down to Dallas and catch some rays on the grassy knoll right after I get back from my next trip to Area 51. Who knows, we might even see the woman in the red dress again.
-- They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
Ben
Actually, I doubt you know what THE conspiracy is. Here is a fact that ONLY I know (it is a fact):
The Arizona Desert DOES NOT exist!!
Many people were on the moon in the late 60s and early 70s. Those people were there to film scenes of a "community" living in the desert of Arizona.
These films routinely show up as proof that Arizona is "inhabited" Like that would really happen.
Does this mean
by
fudgefactor7
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Yeah, and for their next trick, NASA will spend 80 kajillion dollars on a book that proves the hoax book was not a hoax, but it'll be cancelled... etc.
By the way, I wonder how much money was wasted before the project was blown?
-- Voodoo Girl is the bomb!
Obligatory Star Wars quote
by
Jippy_
·
· Score: 2, Funny
"That's no moon..."
=-Jippy
Re:Obligatory Star Wars quote
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
and a thumb wars scene:
"That's no moon..."
'Hand solo' pulls up his pants
In response to the new consipracy theories...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
Don't you realize that the Earth is a giant chocolate chip cookie floating in an even bigger glass of milk? Don't go near the edge, you'll kill us all!
I really wish NASA would get back doing what they do best....it would be much cooler to watch man walk on Mars and then hear about how *that* was faked.
-- Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
Should take inspiration from Hitchhikers Guide
by
binaryDigit
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Take all the people who don't believe, stick them on a spaceship and let them see the landing sites for themselves. We can tell them to "press the big red button" when they are satisfied and are ready to come back home;)
Re:Why don't they...
by
bdesham
·
· Score: 3, Funny
If you flew them into space and plopped them into a crater, they still wouldn't believe it!
Well, it never hurts to try...
-- Alcohol and Calculus don't mix. Don't drink and derive.
The truth is obvious.
by
Prince_Ali
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Not only was the moon landing fake, but also the Space Race and Cold War. The US and Russia have been faking all space exploration. Sputnik I was the only real space launch. It was during this mission that Russia learned that the world sat upon the back of a turtle. The turtle in turn sat upon another. In fact Turtle(n) sat upon Turtle(n+1) into infinity. They shared this info with the US. It was then decided that the general public could not handle this information, and that is why the "Space Race" started to really heat up after Sputnik I. It was all a hoax so that no one would suspect the truth.
Send rocket to the moon with critics and bring them back. A month after they've returned and saying how great it really was and that they were wrong to question the original moon shot, leak a fake video of them on a moon set. Now the conspiracy nuts can't trust each other....
Re:Does it really matter anymore?
by
azadrozny
·
· Score: 5, Funny
We have a space station orbiting the earth
But do we really?!? Have you ever been to this so called "space station"? I though not. That object you see in your telescope is really just a big piece of aluminum foil. It's a giant conspiracy to hide the fact that Russia squandered all of its funds for the ISS on super computers that search the Net for p0rn.:-)
This is an obvious piece of counter-hoax propaganda posturing. It should be clear to any disinterested observer that this is a desperate move on the part of the N(A)SA organization, and act which at once legitimizes the hoax/fraud theory and brushes it aside. However, it will have neither effect: it will at once pique the interest of those who have previously dismissed the fraud theory out of hand, and simultaneously fail to convince those who have previously given the hoaxes credit that the so-called 'artifacts' cited by the fraud theorists should not be given the weight that they have been in some parts.
What sort of conclusions can be drawn from this one-step-forward-one-step-back policy? Perhaps none. Perhaps that the posturing around the so-called "moon" expedition is exactly that. Posturing, and posturing that is still pertinent today.
But the real question that should be on your minds is, when will China reach the moon, and what will they find there? Will they find the footprints and detritus of the N(A)SA agents who purportedly reached the moon? Will they find the sovereign flag of the United States, claiming the entire Moon for our grand country? Or will they find a pristine moon, quite free of all evidence of a 1969 landing, and perhaps even quite different in character than the one shown in the 1969 films.
BUT
Will the communist Chinese even be allowed to reach the moon? Or will their vessel be struck down by an 'antiballistic' missile or laser, with the only information released to the public a Chinese government release describing a non-specific "failure."
I think that the meaning is clear. There is something that the N(A)SA doesn't want us to know about the 1969 moon landing films, OR the hoax surrounding them. Or there is something that they DO want us to know, and this book would not have contained it. The only thing that is clear, is that this book will not be published officially; and that will either lead us in the direction of the truth or away from it, and this may or may not be the intention of the evil N(A)SA and the so-called United States "Government."
Super Russian pr0n computer?
by
Flamesplash
·
· Score: 4, Funny
...Russia squandered all of its funds for the ISS on super computers that search the Net for p0rn
Really? Well I guess what's done is done. So, umm how do I get access to this super pr0n computer, just out of curiousity of course?
-- "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
Re:Why don't they...
by
DaveAtFraud
·
· Score: 3, Funny
As many of you know. I work as a classified documents clerk for NASA, and certin government agencies such as the FBI, the CIA, and NAMBLA. The 'moon landing' photos were actually taken from Delta Station 10-F in the Phabos sector on Venus. The area near the delta station is still un-teraformed and looks very much like earth's moon. This was all done in an attempt to not only obscure the truth about how advanced our space program really was at the time, but to confuse the russians into thinking that the moon is landable, when we all know that the moon is in fact far too soft to land on as it is made out of green cheese and has a core of the styrofoam 'beans' used in modern bean-less beanbag chairs.
Because NASA hasn't got the budget to do anything other than a pityful small manned space program.
The moon is a ridiculous liberal myth
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Funny
It amazes me that so many allegedly "educated" people have fallen so quickly and so hard for a fraudulent fabrication of such laughable proportions. The very idea that a gigantic ball of rock happens to orbit our planet, showing itself in neat, four-week cycles -- with the same side facing us all the time -- is ludicrous. Furthermore, it is an insult to common sense and a damnable affront to intellectual honesty and integrity. That people actually believe it is evidence that the liberals have wrested the last vestiges of control of our public school system from decent, God-fearing Americans (as if any further evidence was needed! Daddy's Roommate? God Almighty!)
Documentaries such as Enemy of the State have accurately portrayed the elaborate, byzantine network of surveillance satellites that the liberals have sent into space to spy on law-abiding Americans. Equipped with technology developed by Handgun Control, Inc., these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up. That's right, neighbors.. the next time you're out in the backyard exercising your Second Amendment rights, the liberals will see it! These satellites are sensitive enough to tell the difference between a Colt.45 and a.38 Special! And when they detect you with a firearm, their computers cross-reference the address to figure out your name, and then an enormous database housed at Berkeley is updated with information about you.
Of course, this all works fine during the day, but what about at night? Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) That's where the "moon" comes in. Powered by nuclear reactors, the "moon" is nothing more than an enormous balloon, emitting trillions of candlepower of gun-revealing light. Piloted by key members of the liberal community, the "moon" is strategically moved across the country, pointing out those who dare to make use of their God-given rights at night!
Yes, I know this probably sounds paranoid and preposterous, but consider this. Despite what the revisionist historians tell you, there is no mention of the "moon" anywhere in literature or historical documents -- anywhere -- before 1950. That is when it was initially launched. When President Josef Kennedy, at the State of the Union address, proclaimed "We choose to go to the moon", he may as well have said "We choose to go to the weather balloon." The subsequent faking of a "moon" landing on national TV was the first step in a long history of the erosion of our constitutional rights by leftists in this country. No longer can we hide from our government when the sun goes down.
Re:The moon is a ridiculous liberal myth
by
vmfedor
·
· Score: 1, Funny
I find it ironic that you can be skeptical of the moon, yet you seem to believe in God with no problem. (.."God-fearing Americans.")
- vmfedor
--
I like my women how I like my sugar.. granulated.
Re:The moon is a ridiculous liberal myth
by
Psiolent
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!)
Two things wrong with this statement. Let me quickly clear things up:
(1) Really anyone is able to *ask* as Joshua did. It's just that not everyone gets a response like he did. Maybe this is just semantics, though.
(2) Joshua didn't ask to stop the rotation of the earth, but rather the movement of the sun across the sky. This proves that the earth *is* the center of the universe! But that's a whole other discussion.
Re:They acknowledged this.
by
WatertonMan
·
· Score: 4, Funny
In my opinion we ought to have the Luddites believing things like the moon landings are fake. It makes it easier to keep track of them. That way their more subtle goofy beliefs like "irradiating meat causes cancer" don't creep into society as easily. When those groups have these sorts of obviously goofy beliefs it shows them for what they are to society at large.
Sort of akin to wanting the far right or far left to hold onto their weird beliefs so that they don't contaminate more moderate groups.
Easy enough to disprove,
by
Archfeld
·
· Score: 3, Funny
we just take the dissentors to the edge of the planet and throw them over the side of the flat earth:)
-- errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
If you still believe...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Funny
To convince the conspiracy theorists, NASA only needs to give them a better theory.
The moon landing was real alright - they released faked photos and such because they actually established a nuclear missile base on the moon, in complete violation of international treaties.
But a few very perceptive people noticed some small discrepancies, so it was necessary to "guide" them into believing the moon shots were faked, so they would be dismissed as kooks.
Work this right, and we might get financing for some more trips to the moon, well equipped for an extended search for the hidden automated missile bases.
Re:From someone who used to think it was real...
by
macdaddy357
·
· Score: 3, Funny
I didn't know Dale Gribble posted here.
-- How ya like dat?
Re:Not really canceled
by
Madman27
·
· Score: 4, Funny
And if you actually read the article, you would have realized that Jim Oberg is still going to write the book, but with alternative funding.
For a second there, I thought you had written "alternative ending" instead of "funding". Since NASA's not going to cough up the money, the new version will end up with the spaceship returning to Earth with Apes at the damn controls.
We just don't want anyone going up there and bothering the monolith. It tells us it doesn't like it when the ape-people keep touching it. Monoliths are very fickle things...
-- You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
false authority syndrome (completely off topic)
by
Theodore+Logan
·
· Score: 5, Funny
What do you mean it's your favorite anti-hoax site so far? Do you know so many you actually have to rank them and pick favorites? Do you spend much of your time looking for new ones?
Don't pretend to be someone you're not. Nobody's impressed anyway (in this case, all it goes to show is that you have some weird priorities).
--
"If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok
The International Society to Disprove the Moon Landings (ISDML) had recently determined that Christopher Columbus had never set foot in North America, and that any evidence presented by the Imperial Spanish Court of Ferdinand and Isabela was indeed a hoax.
There is no proof that Columbus, nor any of the men in his three vessels, had ever crossed the Atlantic and landed in North America. The ISDML believe that any evidence to the contrary was generated as part of an elaborate hoax orchestrated by the Spanish Government in an attempt to convince the world that they were the winners in the "Sea Race" versus their rival nation, Portugal. All evidence was fabricated at an elaboratly constructed studio in Seville, in a blatent attempt to deceive the public.
In fact, the ISDML has failed to find evidence that Europeans have ever reached North America, nor that this 'fabeled' contined does indeed exists.
Or is it? I bet they hid those plans. Deep in their secret underground volcano bookbindery, NASA is putting the finishing touches on a retitled version of that very book. Then, just before the 2011 Christmas season, they'll release it to the public. With a license agreement barring conspiracy theorists from reading it.
I say proceed with hoaxes
by
Tablizer
·
· Score: 2, Funny
NASA cancels moon hoax? They are going to be out of practice if they keep that up.
The Republicans get a majority in the House and Senate and already they're saving taxpayer money.
Re:Why don't they...
by
jerryasher
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Too much light? Take the pictures at night!
Which ground based telescopes could find and resolve the lunar lander, a rover, a flag, or a footprint? And what stops us from using a ground based telescope to find the LM,...?
I can see it now...
by
RedBear
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Tomorrows headlines will read:
MOON HOAX BOOK HOAX, SAY NAY-SAYERS
How decidedly Bloom County-esque.
Re:Obligatory |Matrix| quote
by
mattsucks
·
· Score: 2, Funny
"There is no moon....."
Re:I worked at NASA for four years... you can't wi
by
taphu
·
· Score: 2, Funny
just to keep the damned spacecraft working and the data flowing
HAH! what you really meant was SPY data...;)
Re:I worked at NASA for four years... you can't wi
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
Of course you can't win against the tinfoil hat people. That's the whole point of the hat: they're immune to your mind control rays!
Did you know the word gullible isn't in any dictionary ?
Re:Not really canceled
by
Decimal
·
· Score: 3, Funny
And if you actually read the article, you would have realized that Jim Oberg is still going to write the book, but with alternative funding.
*Whew* I read that wrong and had to do a double take. I thought you said "with an alternative ending"... and I'm thinking "What, the moon was made of cheese after all?"
Of course the moon landing is a hoax! Everybody knows that there really is no moon and it's just a big projection up in the sky created by our government to test effects of radiation on US citizens! Why do you think people go crazy on nights with a full moon?
Re:The moon is a hoax
by
Emperor+Cezar
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Slashdot Mirror
This "proves" the conspiracy!!!
That the moon hoak book was a hoax in itself? lol
"That's no moon..."
=-Jippy
Sane people don't give a sh*t.
Duh! Because the Hubble was faked, too!
Don't you realize that the Earth is a giant chocolate chip cookie floating in an even bigger glass of milk? Don't go near the edge, you'll kill us all!
I really wish NASA would get back doing what they do best....it would be much cooler to watch man walk on Mars and then hear about how *that* was faked.
Take all the people who don't believe, stick them on a spaceship and let them see the landing sites for themselves. We can tell them to "press the big red button" when they are satisfied and are ready to come back home ;)
Alcohol and Calculus don't mix. Don't drink and derive.
Not only was the moon landing fake, but also the Space Race and Cold War. The US and Russia have been faking all space exploration. Sputnik I was the only real space launch. It was during this mission that Russia learned that the world sat upon the back of a turtle. The turtle in turn sat upon another. In fact Turtle(n) sat upon Turtle(n+1) into infinity. They shared this info with the US. It was then decided that the general public could not handle this information, and that is why the "Space Race" started to really heat up after Sputnik I. It was all a hoax so that no one would suspect the truth.
Slashdotter are stupid and biased.
... think the government can't do anything right except cover up whatever pet project they think was faked or hidden?
"Love is a familiar; Love is a devil: there is no evil angel but Love." --William Shakespeare ('Love's Labors Lost')
..that that guy that stole Moon rocks from NASA, and was arrested, will get prison time for stealing ordinary, everyday run-of-the-mill Earth stones!
HAHAHAHA What a hoser!
Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
Send rocket to the moon with critics and bring them back. A month after they've returned and saying how great it really was and that they were wrong to question the original moon shot, leak a fake video of them on a moon set.
Now the conspiracy nuts can't trust each other....
III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIII
But do we really?!? Have you ever been to this so called "space station"? I though not. That object you see in your telescope is really just a big piece of aluminum foil. It's a giant conspiracy to hide the fact that Russia squandered all of its funds for the ISS on super computers that search the Net for p0rn. :-)
This is an obvious piece of counter-hoax propaganda posturing. It should be clear to any disinterested observer that this is a desperate move on the part of the N(A)SA organization, and act which at once legitimizes the hoax/fraud theory and brushes it aside. However, it will have neither effect: it will at once pique the interest of those who have previously dismissed the fraud theory out of hand, and simultaneously fail to convince those who have previously given the hoaxes credit that the so-called 'artifacts' cited by the fraud theorists should not be given the weight that they have been in some parts.
What sort of conclusions can be drawn from this one-step-forward-one-step-back policy? Perhaps none. Perhaps that the posturing around the so-called "moon" expedition is exactly that. Posturing, and posturing that is still pertinent today.
But the real question that should be on your minds is, when will China reach the moon, and what will they find there? Will they find the footprints and detritus of the N(A)SA agents who purportedly reached the moon? Will they find the sovereign flag of the United States, claiming the entire Moon for our grand country? Or will they find a pristine moon, quite free of all evidence of a 1969 landing, and perhaps even quite different in character than the one shown in the 1969 films.
BUT
Will the communist Chinese even be allowed to reach the moon? Or will their vessel be struck down by an 'antiballistic' missile or laser, with the only information released to the public a Chinese government release describing a non-specific "failure."
I think that the meaning is clear. There is something that the N(A)SA doesn't want us to know about the 1969 moon landing films, OR the hoax surrounding them. Or there is something that they DO want us to know, and this book would not have contained it. The only thing that is clear, is that this book will not be published officially; and that will either lead us in the direction of the truth or away from it, and this may or may not be the intention of the evil N(A)SA and the so-called United States "Government."
...Russia squandered all of its funds for the ISS on super computers that search the Net for p0rn
Really? Well I guess what's done is done. So, umm how do I get access to this super pr0n computer, just out of curiousity of course?
"Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
Complete instructions on how to make your own aluminum foil deflector beanie.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
Ben
As many of you know. I work as a classified documents clerk for NASA, and certin government agencies such as the FBI, the CIA, and NAMBLA. The 'moon landing' photos were actually taken from Delta Station 10-F in the Phabos sector on Venus. The area near the delta station is still un-teraformed and looks very much like earth's moon. This was all done in an attempt to not only obscure the truth about how advanced our space program really was at the time, but to confuse the russians into thinking that the moon is landable, when we all know that the moon is in fact far too soft to land on as it is made out of green cheese and has a core of the styrofoam 'beans' used in modern bean-less beanbag chairs.
Because NASA hasn't got the budget to do anything other than a pityful small manned space program.
It amazes me that so many allegedly "educated" people have fallen so quickly and so hard for a fraudulent fabrication of such laughable proportions. The very idea that a gigantic ball of rock happens to orbit our planet, showing itself in neat, four-week cycles -- with the same side facing us all the time -- is ludicrous. Furthermore, it is an insult to common sense and a damnable affront to intellectual honesty and integrity. That people actually believe it is evidence that the liberals have wrested the last vestiges of control of our public school system from decent, God-fearing Americans (as if any further evidence was needed! Daddy's Roommate? God Almighty!)
.. the next time you're out in the backyard exercising your Second Amendment rights, the liberals will see it! These satellites are sensitive enough to tell the difference between a Colt .45 and a .38 Special! And when they detect you with a firearm, their computers cross-reference the address to figure out your name, and then an enormous database housed at Berkeley is updated with information about you.
Documentaries such as Enemy of the State have accurately portrayed the elaborate, byzantine network of surveillance satellites that the liberals have sent into space to spy on law-abiding Americans. Equipped with technology developed by Handgun Control, Inc., these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up. That's right, neighbors
Of course, this all works fine during the day, but what about at night? Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) That's where the "moon" comes in. Powered by nuclear reactors, the "moon" is nothing more than an enormous balloon, emitting trillions of candlepower of gun-revealing light. Piloted by key members of the liberal community, the "moon" is strategically moved across the country, pointing out those who dare to make use of their God-given rights at night!
Yes, I know this probably sounds paranoid and preposterous, but consider this. Despite what the revisionist historians tell you, there is no mention of the "moon" anywhere in literature or historical documents -- anywhere -- before 1950. That is when it was initially launched. When President Josef Kennedy, at the State of the Union address, proclaimed "We choose to go to the moon", he may as well have said "We choose to go to the weather balloon." The subsequent faking of a "moon" landing on national TV was the first step in a long history of the erosion of our constitutional rights by leftists in this country. No longer can we hide from our government when the sun goes down.
..the "alleged" landings were fake.
Sort of akin to wanting the far right or far left to hold onto their weird beliefs so that they don't contaminate more moderate groups.
we just take the dissentors to the edge of the planet and throw them over the side of the flat earth :)
errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
check out this site.
To convince the conspiracy theorists, NASA only needs to give them a better theory.
The moon landing was real alright - they released faked photos and such because they actually established a nuclear missile base on the moon, in complete violation of international treaties.
But a few very perceptive people noticed some small discrepancies, so it was necessary to "guide" them into believing the moon shots were faked, so they would be dismissed as kooks.
Work this right, and we might get financing for some more trips to the moon, well equipped for an extended search for the hidden automated missile bases.
I didn't know Dale Gribble posted here.
How ya like dat?
And if you actually read the article, you would have realized that Jim Oberg is still going to write the book, but with alternative funding.
For a second there, I thought you had written "alternative ending" instead of "funding". Since NASA's not going to cough up the money, the new version will end up with the spaceship returning to Earth with Apes at the damn controls.
It wasn't a fake...
We just don't want anyone going up there and bothering the monolith. It tells us it doesn't like it when the ape-people keep touching it. Monoliths are very fickle things...
You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
What do you mean it's your favorite anti-hoax site so far? Do you know so many you actually have to rank them and pick favorites? Do you spend much of your time looking for new ones?
Don't pretend to be someone you're not. Nobody's impressed anyway (in this case, all it goes to show is that you have some weird priorities).
"If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok
The Mormons were in the 19th century what scientologists are today.
But the Mormons were never a tightly controlled authoritarian cult of personality created by a madman.
Oh, uh, never mind.
For immediate release:
The International Society to Disprove the Moon Landings (ISDML) had recently determined that Christopher Columbus had never set foot in North America, and that any evidence presented by the Imperial Spanish Court of Ferdinand and Isabela was indeed a hoax.
There is no proof that Columbus, nor any of the men in his three vessels, had ever crossed the Atlantic and landed in North America. The ISDML believe that any evidence to the contrary was generated as part of an elaborate hoax orchestrated by the Spanish Government in an attempt to convince the world that they were the winners in the "Sea Race" versus their rival nation, Portugal. All evidence was fabricated at an elaboratly constructed studio in Seville, in a blatent attempt to deceive the public.
In fact, the ISDML has failed to find evidence that Europeans have ever reached North America, nor that this 'fabeled' contined does indeed exists.
More information will be fortcomming.
I knew it -- NASA never did have plans to produce such a book. It was just another hoax :-)
NASA cancels moon hoax? They are going to be out of practice if they keep that up.
Table-ized A.I.
The Russians beat them to it. :-D
--- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
The Republicans get a majority in the House and Senate and already they're saving taxpayer money.
Too much light? Take the pictures at night!
...?
Which ground based telescopes could find and resolve the lunar lander, a rover, a flag, or a footprint? And what stops us from using a ground based telescope to find the LM,
Tomorrows headlines will read:
MOON HOAX BOOK HOAX, SAY NAY-SAYERS
How decidedly Bloom County-esque.
"There is no moon....."
just to keep the damned spacecraft working and the data flowing
;)
HAH! what you really meant was SPY data...
Of course you can't win against the tinfoil hat people. That's the whole point of the hat: they're immune to your mind control rays!
Seems more likely that it is a weather baloon.
Did you know the word gullible isn't in any dictionary ?
And if you actually read the article, you would have realized that Jim Oberg is still going to write the book, but with alternative funding.
*Whew* I read that wrong and had to do a double take. I thought you said "with an alternative ending"... and I'm thinking "What, the moon was made of cheese after all?"
Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
Of course the moon landing is a hoax! Everybody knows that there really is no moon and it's just a big projection up in the sky created by our government to test effects of radiation on US citizens! Why do you think people go crazy on nights with a full moon?
That's not a moon. That's a space station!