Slashdot Mirror


Open the Iris: Stargate SG1 Confirms Season 7

Nefrayu writes "After false rumors having been posted on the /. forum lately about the 7th season of SG-1, Gateworld.net and the SciFi Channel have now confirmed that the show will be carried on SciFi through the 7th season. Along with this announcement is the "surprise" that Dr. Daniel Jackson (portrayed by Michael Shanks) will be returning full time for the said 7th season. Excerpts from an online chat with supervising producer Joseph Mallozzi at SG1Fans can be found here. "

36 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Please insert... by farfisa69 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...fondest Macgyver memory or joke here.

    --
    Meat is murder, I eat chicken.
    1. Re:Please insert... by zenst · · Score: 2, Funny

      indeed the comparrision to Mcgyver moments/last 5 mins of any startrek involving engineering is high but that is paramount to any humour/good scifi. Suppose my current fav would be the eps in season 6 were the 2 geeks try to save sg-1 - realy funny eps but lacking in reconfiguring a starf weapon as a teleport - perhaps season 7 will see that happen.

  2. That's good by acehole · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's good that Daniel Jackson is to return to Stargate, but what happens to Jonas (the one who replaced him for season 6)?

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
    1. Re:That's good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Desk job.

    2. Re:That's good by dvk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      According to the interview, he is "certain" to sign on, if he does, will also be SG1 member. How they plan to expand SG1 to 5 people, i'm not sure. But watchng the interplay between him and Jackson, if written as well as other interaction between team members, would be fun.
      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    3. Re:That's good by guybarr · · Score: 3, Funny


      It's good that Daniel Jackson is to return to Stargate ?

      The producer wants to kick him out, he ascends to godhood, the crowds want him back in, he descends back to mortality.

      Will they frigin decide what is his theological rank ? All these phase transitions are tiring.

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
    4. Re:That's good by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 2

      I hope they fight. Everyone's gotten all friendly and cosy over the years that things are getting boring. Even Jonas (an alien) is being accepted now. I put ten bucks on Jonas to kick Daniel's butt. Not only is he "a quick study" (damn I hate it when he says that), he also has raging pectorals (which the makers like to remind us of by always giving him tight t-shirts). He should win, assuming that Daniel hasn't acquired any eery powers from beyond the grave.

  3. New plot line for season 7 by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    They travel to a world where they are attacked, the scientists screw up dramatically and the military has to go in and save the day, all the while the alien companions know absolutely nothing about the world, have nothing of value to input, and in general get underfoot throughout the entire episode.

    We can call this season: Journey to the not-so-parallel universe.

    --
    You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
  4. Dr Daniel is returning? You mean to say he left? by Xpilot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aaaah.... I've been Lone Gunmenned.

    In the country where I live, SG1 hasn't gone that far yet :)

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  5. Re:Dr Daniel is returning? You mean to say he left by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 4, Funny

    whats even worse is 9/10 people who read your post will understand it...

    --
    I live in a giant bucket.
  6. In defense of SG-1 by rde · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I liked the movie, but the series is the only one I watch at the moment, with the exception of the surprisingly excellent Odyssey 5. Both of the above, IMO, are up there with the greats (B5, Farscape, Misfits of Science, early McGyver, etc).

    And what does 'extrapolates too far' mean, anyway? It's a science fiction series. If they didn't extrapolate as much as they did, it'd be a shit series. Everyone'd spend every week staring at the iris, wondering what those occasional 'thuds' were.

  7. Re:What is this? TV Guide? by dacarr · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, no, no, you got it all wrong! It gives Richard Dean Anderson a career beyond MacGuyver!

    --
    This sig no verb.
  8. Re:What is this? TV Guide? by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 2
    It gives Richard Dean Anderson a career beyond MacGuyver!
    And Corin Nemec a career beyond Parker Lewis Can't Lose!
  9. Anyone ? by JohnHegarty · · Score: 2

    Brad Wright will take the year off to develop the hopeful spin-off series Stargate Atlantis, though he will still write for SG-1.

    Anyone know what this is about ?

    1. Re:Anyone ? by neur0maniak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      About as much as I know, there's going to be another movie, called Atlantis. It'll be about the Ancients (Y'know, the guys who supposedly built the stargate system). They were said to have moved on from "our region of space", I think it was in Series 2: Episode 15 (The Fifth Race).

      The legend of atlantis, being an advanced civilisation sinking under sea, and with the stargate event horizon looking like water, it's easy to join the two together.

      I think the series will be a spin-off from that, about an off-world SGC, based in the region of space where the Ancients are.

      I'm not really sure on this though, and don't have any sources to hand. But I must be remembering it from somewhere!

  10. Re:Dr Daniel is returning? You mean to say he left by Reziac · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure where the heck we are locally (Los Angeles, broadcast only -- no cable here); we just got an episode about a pyramid, I mean ziggurat [g] followed by one that was unmemorably Star Trekish in plot. What season is this anyway?? I've only been able to get a channel that carries SG-1 for a few months, so it's *all* new to me.

    Daniel Jackson is the character who hooked me in the first place, and is still my favourite. So I'll be sorry to see him go, and glad to get him back!

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  11. I really hope it's not all a dream! by Flamesplash · · Score: 2

    I really really hope that they don't pull the whole, Season 6 was just a dream thing. It kind of soured the entire Bob Newhart show when they did that.

    What I'd like to know is how much the new season will be like the original story line was supposed to. While not having every detail planned out I'm sure the writters have the story hashed out for the most part, and I wonder how much the viewers loose/gain by the hiatus of one of the pivotal characters.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:I really hope it's not all a dream! by ClosedSource · · Score: 2

      Actually, it wasn't the "Bob Newhart" show that was a dream. The show called "Newhart" was just a dream of Newhart's character in the older "Bob Newhart" show. It was a parody of the 1986-1987 season of Dallas. Very funny.

  12. Re:What is this? TV Guide? by DAldredge · · Score: 2

    You are mistaken e are talking about SG1 not Farscape (aka muppets in space!)

  13. Re:who's running the sci/fi channel anyway? by erpbridge · · Score: 3, Interesting

    New Twilight Zone is UPN, not SciFi. Maybe you're thinking of the new Outer Limits... which originally was made by Showtime, then after about 4 years Sci-Fi bought it.

    SG-1 was also oiginally made by Showtime... and bought by Sci-Fi after about 5 years.

    I think Lexx was originally an HBO series, bought by Sci-Fi.

    I never watched Lexx, but I watched Outer Limits and SG-1 before and after Sci-Fi. Anyone notice that after Sci-Fi buys something that's still in production (not something in reruns like Lost in Space or Forever Knight), the quality of the show decreases dramatically?

    Another example: Sliders. Was orignally a FOX show. It was a good show in it's 1st season, then Fox's execs demanded it be turned to crap, which of course got it cancelled. Sci-Fi bought it, and REALLY screwed it up.

    I think the quality of Sci-Fi's writers also hinges on the fact that:

    1) they're not a premium network. They make money off commercials and a few product placements, not off monthly subscriptions and product placements.
    2) they're owned by USA, which is also known for tons of crap.

    I think it's about 70% number 2, 20% number 1, and the rest just general faults of these shows (certain premises last longer than others, and you can only do so many plots on the same general building blocks.)

  14. Re:who's running the sci/fi channel anyway? by erpbridge · · Score: 2

    Obligatory:

    3)?????
    4)Profit!!!

    (which goes right in line with what I just wrote...)

  15. Re:who's running the sci/fi channel anyway? by Bobulusman · · Score: 4, Interesting
    That's b/c Invisible Man and Farscape were total crap! Lexx is crap! The new Twilight Zone is crap! Any other "SF originals" that I forgot? Oh yeah, Saint-Sinner is crap! Taken is crap!
    I would agree with you on Lexx and that crappy new Outer Limits (I think that's what you ment) and Good vs Evil (again, I watch too much tv), but I liked the other two.

    Farscape was really good, at least for the first couple seasons. This last one was kinda crap. I know I'll be flamed for that, but, seriously, it seemed like the characters could not keep the same personality from episode to episode.

    The invisible man gave me some good chuckles, again, mainly in the first couple seasons. When they brought in that person from Black Scorpion and actually started getting serious about the plot, they lost focus. It was a comedy, not a drama! Ugh.

    It's too bad we can't start our own cable network....can you imagine the /. channel? What would you (yeah you! the one reading this right now!) put on it.
    A /. channel? Hmm.... MST3K, a little anime, a GOOD scifi movie on Saturday nights (like Tron), Red Dwarf, Futurama. In the morning, say, 8-11 am, you could show the cartoons from our childhoods. Who doesn't like to watch those when they are sick? :)
    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  16. That's great...hey... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...has anyone heard who shot JR? I missed that episode.

  17. We want his girlfriend instead! by Snaller · · Score: 2

    I mean, I like that Shanks will return as Dr. Daniel Jackson, but what we really need is for this girlfriend Lexa Doig to come on board, she is waste on that other crappy show :o)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  18. Oh, who gives #$*!&$ ... by zangdesign · · Score: 2

    the important thing is ... WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO RELEASE THE NEXT FERSHLUGGINER BOXED SET?!??!!!?

    AARRGGHH!!

    (I don't EVEN want to hear about how they're already out in the UK. I KNOW they're out in the UK. I want them out in AMERICA!)

    --
    To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  19. There is no god. by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Farscape is cancelled, but SG-1 gets another season? Were we all really bad in a past life or something?

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:There is no god. by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2
      You forgot the other factors:
      • Moving the time so much that fans lose track of where it is
      • Splitting the series in two
      Somebody up high wanted the series nuked and they were successful. It seems that the Sci-Fi channel is afraid of Sci-Fi unless it is star-drek related.
    2. Re:There is no god. by robobor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't believe Sci-Fi's PR spin -

      Farscape still got the SECOND highest ratings of anything on Sci-Fi, behind SG1. Even with the unfavorable 10pm time slot and lack of promotion, the average ratings for the first half of season 4 were down only a tenth or two from season 3. If you compare the episodes of season 3 broadcast during the summer (when overall TV viewership is down) and the first eleven of season 4, also broadcast in the summer, the ratings are unchanged.

      Sci-Fi made the decision to buy seasons 4 and 5 after season 3, so if the numbers from season 3 convinced them they could afford 4 and 5, and the ratings were nearly the same, then that can not be used as an excuse for the cancellation of the show.

      SG-1 gets over 2 million viewers for the episodes in syndication. Obviosuly SG-1 has a larger fanbase than Farscape, so it will do better in the ratings. The decision to replace Farscape with SG-1 was made by the beancounters. SG-1 costs about the same to make, and gets slightly higher ratings.

      What doesn't make any sense is why they couldn't do both. Farscape was still their second highest rated show. Why not try to build another night of good programing? Say, with SG-1 anchoring Friday night, Farscape anchoring some other night. That's how real networks build schedules and audiences. Not by killing their best shows. Imagine NBC cancelling Frasier because it finished second to Friends in the ratings.

    3. Re:There is no god. by BigBir3d · · Score: 2

      You are forgetting about average cost per episode. Rating points per dollar were not as good. SciFi does not have the money NBC has to keep marginal shows with good ratings, and high prices.

  20. Re:who's running the sci/fi channel anyway? by Bobulusman · · Score: 2

    But look how many of us there are. Plus, I doubt most software companies would normally consider selling ads. If they believe a group of 400000+ nerds were watching it, they might just consider it a viable market.

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  21. Re:Daniel Jackson Back!? by The+Rizz · · Score: 3, Informative
    My big concern is how they will bring him back without making the plot totally absurd!

    They actually set that up near the beginning of season 5 (in episode 3, "Ascension"), long before Jackson left the show. It is aparrently easy for any ascended being to become mortal again - it's ascending again that's difficult.

    --The Rizz

    "The only 'ism' that has justified itself is 'pessimism'." --George Orwell

  22. Re:who's running the sci/fi channel anyway? by BigAl_nz · · Score: 2

    Another example: Sliders. Was orignally a FOX show. It was a good show in it's 1st season, then Fox's execs demanded it be turned to crap, which of course got it cancelled. Sci-Fi bought it, and REALLY screwed it up.

    Why I'm holding fears for Firefly at the moment. It's *so* good (IMO of course) that I'm scared that the network is going to have to dumb it down, or cancel it outright.

    Please leave it as it is !! :)

    --
    --- There isn't any problem that can't be solved by a small, low yield nuclear device, is there??
  23. Higher Plane Extradimensional Canoodling by meehawl · · Score: 2

    Shanks left the series at the end of season five, and his character gave up human life and ascended to a higher plane of existence.

    Well you know I find it suspicious that the Cordelia character in Angel has also just returned from some higher plane of something-or-other. Maybe her and Daniel Jackson (ascended) were getting it on in some weird posthuman sense?

    --

    Da Blog
  24. Re:Daniel Jackson Back!? by Temsi · · Score: 2, Informative

    I didn't mind him gone. I never really liked his character that much, especially throughout season 6. He was dead weight as far as I'm concerned.

    Eh... he wasn't in season 6. What show are you watching?
    In any case, I'm thrilled he's returning. As far as I'm concerned his character is what held the show together (he offered the only non-military non-alien input), and without him it just hasn't been the same.
    Season 6 has been rather disappointing so far, but with the confirmation of season 7 and Daniel's return, I hope the second half of season 6 will improve. At least 7 will be better with Daniel back.

    --
    -- This sig for rent.
  25. how they will bring jackson back by zephc · · Score: 3, Funny

    scene: outside

    Daniel Jackson appears wearing a white robe, surrounded by a glowing light: "I come to you now in your hour need."

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    1. Re:how they will bring jackson back by mpe · · Score: 2

      Daniel Jackson appears wearing a white robe, surrounded by a glowing light: "I come to you now in your hour need."

      Followed by "who are you, for that matter who am I?"