Slashdot Mirror


In Stores Soon: Perishable DVDs

Makarand writes "Technology that renders optical media useless after a short lifespan will soon find its way into stores in the form of perishable DVDs. Retailers in the Southern United States will soon start giving a sample DVD to buyers of a CD (by Nappy Roots, a hip-hop group). This promotional DVD from Atlantic Records will work for only 8 hours. This promotion is aimed at finding if music fans would be interested in buying a package with both audio and video instead of just plain audio. A special dye sandwiched between the layers of the DVD will interact with air making it opaque and unreadable later. If this media catches on you may not have to return your DVD rentals in the future." We noted this 2.5 years ago.

46 of 586 comments (clear)

  1. So copy it the first time you watch. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pathetic attempt at locking out consumers once again.

    1. Re:So copy it the first time you watch. by ninthwave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well the comment on rental movies using this just made me think. Doesn't this sound very wasteful. From a plastic production and disposale sense. It is bad enough we have millions of AOl cds that you have to find something to do with but now you will have dvd coasters with them. There are only so many coasters one household needs before this just becomes more filler in the tip (dump for the Americas)

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    2. Re:So copy it the first time you watch. by SonicBurst · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And this could be way out there, but if the stuff reacts with air, couldn't you just spray the surface with some optically clear but non-air permeable gunk? This of course assumes said gunk exists, but I'm sure it does.

      --

      Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
    3. Re:So copy it the first time you watch. by uberdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      So send them back when they expire.

    4. Re:So copy it the first time you watch. by Herkum01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was thinking about this, and I was wondering, which is more wasteful, a disposable DVD, or driving X miles round trip to and from the video store to return them. If you are going back to the store anyways it is no big deal but to just drop them off, it depends.

    5. Re:So copy it the first time you watch. by ninthwave · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But you have to add in the collection % of petrol used for waste collection and this may depend on how often you rent movies. I used to rent one a night because I worked nights and daytime tele was not geared towards me. So in the 3 years I worked nights that would have been an average of 700 of these in the rubbish but the video store was between my work and home relatively.

      It all does depend so the question is will they give you a choice?

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    6. Re:So copy it the first time you watch. by ninthwave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or put them in your tea :)

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    7. Re:So copy it the first time you watch. by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Joe average will then say hey, I guess I can't. And proceed to watch it on his TV, and not copy (unless just to the VCR).

      I'm realated to a Mr Joe Average. He bought a consumer DVD recorder for his television, and returned it to the store angrily when he realized he couldn't copy the DVDs he rented onto blank media.

      Joe average may not know about how the technology works, but he's also not willing to pay for something that removes functionality that he's previously had with video tapes.

      Similarly, my mother only listens to CDs on her headphones that are pluged into the CD-ROM drive of her computer at work. Guess who isn't going to be buying any copy protected CDs.

      The copy protection battle will be won by Joe Average.

  2. This is great! by FyRE666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this media catches on you may not have to return your DVD rentals in the future.

    Yet another way to contribute to the environment. Let's just dump more trash rather than get off our lazy asses to take the DVD back to the shop... Jesus...

    1. Re:This is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Walk a mile. Human beings walk for short distances. That's what the things dangling down from your chair to the floor are. Try it some time!

    2. Re:This is great! by FyRE666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is a pathetic excuse - rarely do people jump in their car and JUST take a DVD back to the shop without doing anything else (shopping etc). Much of the time a person returning a DVD will hire another anyway, in which case they would have made the trip for that reason. This is all assuming they have to use a car in the first place.

      Of course, you can try to argue that the sheer weight of the DVD will cause teh vehicle to use extra fuel I guess...

    3. Re:This is great! by kramer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, I wrote an e-mail to the company developing this when the story ran 2.5 years ago -- I'll quote the response in full (Yes, I'm a packrat):


      Thank you for your comments. We have been sharing your frustration as the new reports have failed to report this product will be a recyclable. Just a drop the disc in the bucket next to the butter container and milk bottle. It also eliminates the car pollution of returning the movie to the store. avg. 10 miles and 1/3 gallon of gas.

      We appreciate your concern.

      SpectraDisc


      I still think it's a stupid idea, but it's moved from monumentally stupid to moderately stupid.

    4. Re:This is great! by Damek · · Score: 4, Informative

      Which begs the question, "How many people will actually recycle it?"

      Here in NYC we can't recycle glass any more. Stupid mayor. Now they want to institute a "pay as you throw" garbage tax, which I think is actually a good idea, but only if they reinstate full recycling.

      So anyway, how will these things be recyclable? They're part plastic and part metal, right? They really need to educate people & city recycling programs about how and where to put these if they're truly going to be responsible about their products. ...as we all should be responsible for what we produce and consume...

      Regardless, surely having no physical matter at all is the best solution! Ah, but then we have to worry about how dirty the computer chip manufacturing process is. Trying to be responsible is so damn frustrating sometimes! Maybe I should just give in and pollute to my heart's content!

    5. Re:This is great! by cheesebot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and this is also a great reason why i can't imagine video rental stores actually promoting this (or divx) because much of their business model is based on bringing the customer back into the store for returns - they're likely to rent or buy something else while they're there. it's like a guarantee that your customer will come back. not so with this disposable crap.

    6. Re:This is great! by kubrick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So: One acre hole in Nevada, or 1 million tons of pollution. Your choice.

      How are you going to move all of these discs to that hole? Magic? I'd say some fuel might be expended in the effort... how much does pollution is produced by all the garbage trucks in the US for a year? What's, say, 0.5% of that?

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    7. Re:This is great! by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought those were my testicles.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  3. In the future... by Dim_Slashdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    we will buy expensive hard drives that are designed to fail after a short time...

    Oh wait... we already do.

    1. Re:In the future... by FyRE666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      we will buy expensive hard drives that are designed to fail after a short time...

      Don't Fujitsu already sell these?

  4. Oh they think they're so clever then.. by Scooter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Notice on the disk will read "You have 8 hours to listen to this music"

    Geek reads "You have 8 hours to rip this data to your RAID 5 dedicated music storage facility".

    hehe.

  5. 8 hours? by RedWolves2 · · Score: 4, Redundant

    8 hours is plenty of time to rip and make an MP3 out of it.

    1. Re:8 hours? by RedWolves2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Interesting...I never heard of ogg. I had to look it up. I'll have to give it a try and see how it compares. Thanks. ;-)

  6. Summary... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Insightful


    You buy something that breaks after a few hours, its then just plain trash.

    So apart from being bad from an environmental, consumer and most other perspectives this is a good thing because it helps push up the pollution rates even further.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  7. I'm curious by iceT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is the entertainment industry so hell-bent on NOT giving us entertainment?

    You'd think that will the failure of DivX (the Circuit City one), they they would realize that when someone buys something, they expect to keep it...

    Even for Video rentals, I wonder if we're SUCH a disposable society that creating this much waste is worth it.

    --
    -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
  8. More Trash by Seldon_21 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    DIVX! Think about the waste. "If this media catches on you may not have to return your DVD rentals in the future." The rental chains business model is based upon you not returning them on time. So why would they go for this idea? and Where do you think that get there money from?

    1. Re:More Trash by jeremyacole · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have a good point. Their model is based on you not returning the videos on time so they collect late fees. But, if you think about it, it's also based on you actually *returning* the movies, as well. You're probably something like 50% more likely to rent *more* movies if you already have to go back to the store to return the old ones. I know I am.

      In any case, I really don't think Blockbuster and Hollywood Video are going to warm up to the idea...

  9. Decomposing dollar bills by cdf12345 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too bad I couldn't put the same coating on my dollar bills that would cause them to decompose as soon as the MPAA or RIAA touches them.

    --
    Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
  10. seal it by rkoot · · Score: 5, Interesting
    would it be a big problem to, say, seal the edges of the cd with maybe a glue on silicon base or something ?
    if the air can't reach the dye in between, I guess the cd stays readable, no ?

    a just a thought.

    rkoot
    I'm not as think as you drunk I am

    1. Re:seal it by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Informative

      clear nail polish sounds like a good starter. that way, it has less mass and is less likely to destabilize the disk while it's spinning

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  11. Re:Nothing new here by demon · · Score: 5, Funny

    After a few years on the dash of a car, it all becomes "Best of Queen" anyway...

    --

    Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
    Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  12. Yet Another Circumvention Technique by limekiller4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What do you want to bet that giving it a quick spray of clearcoat will render the disk substrate isolated from oxygen yet still useable?

    What is to stop me from making a copy that is less unstable, for that matter (the article actual touches upon this at the end) once the price of blanks come down? A right, I might add (and we all know) that is codified in the Fair Use clause of Copyright law.

    I'm gonna go out on a limb and say this isn't happening anytime soon.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  13. Re:Or throw it in the recycle bin. by will_die · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live in Germany were they have fairly high recycling laws.

    When I asked about CD when I was turning in some batteries I was told to toss them in the bin where non-recyclable items are put.

  14. Fortunately... by Rayonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fortunately I live in a Neon/Argon atmosphere, so this shouldn't be much of a problem for me.

  15. Again I post my same little thought... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...that when they do things like this, it proved that THEY HAVE LOST.

    Stand back for a minute and look at the big picture. Take a breath, take a minute, and think about it. They encrypt their content and then store it on self destructing disks. HA! It's so pathetic it's funny. If there was ever an example of the dead horse (Rosen?) getting another whack (DMCA?) this is IT. They lost.

    Imagine the munks, years ago, using disapearing ink in their scrolls so you didn't have time to read it long enough to place letters on a plate at a printing press! Same shit. Different day. "DISTRIBUTION" is dead. If any 5 year old can publish themselves WORLD WIDE 24/7, then the business of distrobution (of "information") is dead. Ever see a little kid make a homepage on AOL? They do... it ain't XHTML but it's there for the world to see 24/7. Tell me again why I need YOU to publish my info for ungodly sums of money? Tell me again why I should listen to one artist for one hour at a time on obsolete media?

  16. "We noted this 2.5 years ago." by tmark · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess things are coming full-circle when Slashdot editors are pointing out the retread stories for us !

  17. Re:Yay for Environmetal Pollution! by vidarh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The question is whether the discs will pollute more or less than the average pollution of people travelling to the rental outlet to return discs. It's not automatically a given that creating waste is a bad thing if it has positive effects that outweigh the problems it cause. I'm not saying that it is good, just that automatically assuming it's bad because it create waste isn't very constructive.

  18. Great... by tmark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some company comes up with a way to distribute content in such a way that users can actually listen/view/try it in their home BEFORE buying, and /. readers are busy rubbing their hands in glee at the likely truth that will still be able to rip it off.

    Where are the kudos for addressing a supposed itch that so many of the P2Pers out there use to justify the existence of unfettered file "sharing" ?

  19. How long... by Nomad7674 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...until someone gets sued for allowing the packaging of such discs to be punctured, thus prematurely invalidating the promotional DVD value. I can see the advertiser being FURIOUS if they paid a few million dollars to imprint, say, the newest BMW ad on the James Bond soundtrack, only to find that no consumers can view it because the plastic shrinkwrap failed to keep out enough air.

    Seems like a disaster waiting to happen. No to mention that it will drive MORE people to rip this video in order to be able to rewatch it - exactly what the RIAA and MPAA do NOT want.

  20. Blockbuster by SlamMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No rental chain will ever use this. They'd have to either a) store hundreds eachs video of these in thier store to rent out. Think how many differnt videos they have. Now, multiply that by every customer they have. Now, I know they could get away with less, but just think how many copies of lotr or Harry Pottery alone they'd need? Their other option would be b) let the clerks in the store burn them them each time for each customer. This means they're still going to need thousands of these blanks sitting around, and they've jsut giving thier $5.65/h employees the ability to make DVDs. There's no way these wouldn't be hacked to make real dvds.

    --
    Mod point free since 2001
  21. Re:I for one would like to see by Carmody · · Score: 5, Funny

    right now my g/f has a $300 fine for having 2 videos that are like 6 mos overdue which is completely insane..

    It is. She should have returned the videos. What a whiner.

    --
    God is real unless declared integer
  22. Bad Precedent -- dont accept it by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The goal will be to make **ALL** media time sensitive, so you cant actually retain anything and must continue to pay for listening/viewing/reading time.

    Would be applicable in the software market too, forced upgrades since your original cant be used after the next release is out. ( using estimated time of next releases )

    Or in the case of E-books, ' sorry that document is no longer acceptable speech, that isn't available for lease any longer'

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  23. One Simple Question by cascadefx · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Do we not have enough trash in the world as it is?!?!?

    If the process was reversable, I could see its usefulness. But, just rendering them useless sucks the big one.

    We already can't find anything useful to do with the millions of AOL CDs floating about.

  24. Tit for tat by edp · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think self-destructing DVDs are a great idea as long as I can pay for them with dollars printed with disappearing ink.

  25. Marking direction by eyeball · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is yet another glimps into the minds of the entertainment industry's marketing people. The holy grail is pay-per-use consumer products, which unfortunately is a concept that is fairly new in capitalism, especially in the United States where property laws reflect mostly tangible goods. This helps to explain why companies and consumers are having so many problems with each other.

    Anyway, the distribution methods look somethin like this, from most desirable (and most profitable) to least:

    Pay-per-Use - Require consumer to pay for each experience (i.e.: theater movies, pay-per-view, arcade games)

    Subscription - if pay-per-use isn't possible, require the user to pay a recurring subscription fee for access to the material (i.e.: cable)

    Media Ownership - if subscription isn't possible, sell the media in a permanent form to the consumer.

    Media ownership is of course the most desired for the consumer. It allows them to experience themusic/movie/etc whenever they want, trade or sell it to friends, etc. Of course it's the least profitable for the industry.

    The problem media companies are facing is that, as technology matures, it's allowing consumers to use the media in any way they want. For example, using a Tivo to turn subscription-distributed media into owned permemant media.

    What we're seeing now is the entertainment industry scrambling to use laws that were originally enacted to protect companies from each other, and bend them to try and keep consumers from using the media for which it wasn't originally intended.

    Here's a hypothetical situation: In 15 years medical science progresses to the point where they fix eyesight with little nano machines. In the process they also give people the ability to record what they watch and play it back (kind of like a Tivo built-in to your head). Thus turning everything you experience into the potential for permenant media. What do you think the entertainment industry will do then? Legislate congress to make all medical nano devices capible of recording motion images be part of a digital rights management royalty payment system, and likely called something along the lines of the Digital Medical Device Copyright Act. That's if the entertainment industry is still alive in the same for it is today, which I doubt.

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
  26. Flexplay Enviornmental Impact Report by buckminster · · Score: 4, Informative

    Like many of you I was stunned that this story is receiving covereage without any comment on the potential environmental impact of disposable DVD's.

    A quick search of Google turned up the following:

    http://enduse.lbl.gov/Info/VideoImpacts.pdf

    Flexplay approached a scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Labs to perform an environmental assessment of the disposable DVD technology.

    This report is truly amusing. The scientist acknowledges that he was not given enough time to perform a standard Life Cycle Assessment on disposable DVDs, so instead he calculated the amount of pollution that would be prevented if disposable DVDs were depoloyed as a video rental option. He theorizes that if 10% of all consumers renting DVDs did not have to make a return trip to the video store the envirnmental impact of increased junk being sent to a land fill would be offset by a decrease in pollution.

    What a hoot. I guess Flexplay didn't bother to explain their marketing strategy. It appears that these disks are being deployed as promotional items which are handed out for free and are never intended to be returned.

    Flexplay is also persuing the Hotel market. Just how much pollution would be prevented if a guest didn't have to walk down to the lobby to return their rental?

    If this is the best defense that Flexplay can come up with then we must believe that the potential evironmental impact will be pretty bad.

    Are we really willing to trash our planet in the battle against piracy? Hollywood's answer seems to be a resounding YES.

  27. Returns? by zardor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This won't catch on. Rental companies have a significant revenue stream from people returning stuff late. (Blockbuster - 15-20%) If the stuff is disposable, then they can't charge you for not returning it. They mightn't care about the enviornment, but they do care about their shareholders.

    --
    -- We don't understand software, and sometimes we don't understand hardware, but we can *see* the blinking lights
  28. Chemistry for fun and profit. by pla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nope. Get a 10 gallon aquarium (they cost like $10-$20), and a tank of helium (the party-balloon filling small tanks, they cost as high as $40 but half that you get back when you return the tank, and one full tank lasts almost forever).

    Put the wrapped DVD in the aquarium. Take two rubber gloves and some saran-wrap to effectively seal the top of the aquarium (make sure to use enough that putting on the gloves won't break the seal).

    Tip the aquarium on its side, and peel away a small hole in one top and the opposite bottom corner.

    Light a votive candle and place it in front of the lower hole.

    Add helium, via the PVC tube that almost certainly came with the aquarium (if not, pay the $0.15/foot for a few feet), to the upper hole. Add it slowly, and when the candle goes out, keep adding for a few more seconds.

    Voila! You now have a home-made, inert-gas, anhydrous glove box! Put your hands in the gloves, unwrap the DVD, and apply the clear nail polish to the edge. Oops, you *did* remember to put the nail polish in the aquarium before sealing it, right? ;-)