Slashdot Mirror


Book on NR-1

snStarter writes "Hyman Rickover created NR-1 for a variety of purposes, one of which included doing science from a nuclear-powered vessel capable of sustained deep operations. Back in the '70s I really wanted to be on the crew of this puppy but all crew members were required to qualify as second class divers and that was hopeless for me. A new book, and web site, discusses NR-1 and is the most complete information on the boat I've seen in one place."

57 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. Creepy... by peterb · · Score: 5, Insightful


    It must take a very special sort of soldier to submit to the claustrophobic surroundings and lack of freedom inherent in being in a submarine. I can only wonder what that's like when you're in a submarine that nobody knows about.

    Watching Das Boot was as close as I ever want to get to that.

    1. Re:Creepy... by korgull · · Score: 3, Funny

      Staying at home reading /. all the time might give you the same feeling.

    2. Re:Creepy... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the nuclear boats are a hell of a lot more comfortable than the WWII era boats. (For rounds numbers, 2x the crew with 9x the interior volume)

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    3. Re:Creepy... by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 3, Informative

      You would be correct for every nuclear boat _except_ the NR-1. It's tiny. It is more cramped than the WWII era boats.

    4. Re:Creepy... by Ponty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is the nuclear-ness means that it stays underwater for a _long_ time. The WWII boats had to come up, which meant a walk in the sun or the fresh air every so often.

      Really cool, nonetheless. It must have been thrilling to be looking out the funky viewports at things that no human had ever seen before at the bottom of the ocean.

    5. Re:Creepy... by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They seem to get it together somehow. A good illustration is to watch aircraft being parked as they land on an aircraft carrier. When a highly trained Annapolis officer taxis an airplane toward the edge of a wet, rolling deck until he's about 10 feet out over the water and looks back for a 19-year-old kid to tell him with hand gestures when to turn, he seems to be showing a certain confidence.

      rj

    6. Re:Creepy... by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you want to see cramped, have a look at U-1 (launched 1906) in the Deutsches Museum in Munich. It's a full-fledged diesel-electric boat, but it looks like something about halfway between a WW2 U-Boat and the Hunley.

      rj

    7. Re:Creepy... by maddogdelta · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I spent 4 years active duty on a submarine, and I will say that the toughest it really got was when the ice cream machine broke.

      NR-1 was never designed for long duration operations. It was designed more as an ego booster for Rickover. The other nukes were small, but you still had about the same personal space as one would have on a destroyer. My vote for those people who had it toughest were the people who either (a) get shot at more often than submariners (army/marine corps infantry) or (b) operate such high power machinery that they only have a 75% chance of living to retirement age (air force/naval/marine/army aviators).

      Pass the caramel sauce!

      --
      -- There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    8. Re:Creepy... by barzok · · Score: 2

      That's why the US submariner corps is volunteer-only and applicants have to pass a pretty thorough psych evaluation (last I heard).

    9. Re:Creepy... by Desert+Raven · · Score: 5, Informative

      Heh, I love this line of thinking.

      I spent 6 months on a helicopter carrier. It was often weeks between times I got out on the surface decks, and I was allowed to. Not just any schmuck can waltz out on the weather decks when it pleases them. The vast majority of the time, only those folks whose jobs require it are allowed out there. Most folks spend the entire time inside. Thus, the difference is that the surface ships are almost always pitching and rolling, as opposed to the subs, which are pretty stable unless doing vigorous maneuvering.

    10. Re:Creepy... by Macgruder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tail end of the cold war... Joined in '88. Was a sonar tech. Did my share of WESTPACs.

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    11. Re:Creepy... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      It must take a very special sort of soldier to submit to the claustrophobic surroundings and lack of freedom inherent in being in a submarine. I can only wonder what that's like when you're in a submarine that nobody knows about.
      Aw! Comeon. I've been dreaming of going on a sub for ages; when I did visit an operational (diesel) one, I didn't stop dreaming about that even when I saw the cramped conditions inside.

      The funny thing is that by looking at the configuration and the control/gauges, I managed to guess the operationnal characteristics of the sub, and it was obvious by the crew's faces when I asked them to confirm my suspicions ("sorry, that's classified"), I managed to guess correctly...

    12. Re:Creepy... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Funny
      I spent 4 years active duty on a submarine, and I will say that the toughest it really got was when the ice cream machine broke.
      Chode: What the hell have you been fixing those past three days?
      Gus: The transdigital freon converted.
      - And what's that for?
      - It makes ice cubes.
    13. Re:Creepy... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      I guess the pilot is rarely allowed to do donuts on the bottom with the wheels... :^)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    14. Re:Creepy... by eyegor · · Score: 2

      The people who are accepted into the submarine program are generally considered to be the cream-of-the-crop. They're pretty carefully screened to ensure you don't get a major nutcase.

      I've only seen a few people who truely didn't fit, and they didn't last long before they were transfered to the surface Navy.

      Eyegor (plankowner, SSN-689, SSN-711)

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    15. Re:Creepy... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      Are they as risky as I hear jet carrier decks are? People who walk in the wrong place tend to lose their heads... literally.

      Bruce

    16. Re:Creepy... by eyegor · · Score: 2

      Well.... It used to be true anyway... I was in from 76 through 82. I got out as an STS1(SS) (and it wasn't THAT hard to make first class).

      I really loved what I did, but if you want a REAL life and a chance at a good marriage, you didn't want to be in boats. Most of the married guys I knew ended up getting divorced.

      Joining the Navy was the second best thing I ever did. Getting out was the best (not counting having kids).

      Eyegor (the geek formerly known as "Jake")

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    17. Re:Creepy... by nounderscores · · Score: 2

      Captain: How could they find us?! We engaged the silent but deadly drive...

    18. Re:Creepy... by crawling_chaos · · Score: 4, Interesting
      True, but at the depths NR-1 is capable of operating at, the pressure is so great that small leak comes in with enough force to sever a finger or even an arm like a band saw would. It's designed for deeper diving than the typical fast-attack, although not as deep as a specialized deep-diver like Alvin.

      Neither job is for the risk-adverse, I'm afraid.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  2. Obligatory submarine joke... by rob-fu · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's long, hard and full of seamen?

    (ducks)

    1. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by Myco · · Score: 2

      It doesn't work when you type it, you know.

    2. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by Myco · · Score: 2

      Touchay.

    3. Re:Obligatory submarine joke... by Myco · · Score: 2

      Yeah. I actually went back and forth for a while trying to come up with a plausible-yet-recognizable misspelling of "touché."

  3. NR and underwater Archaeology by tcd004 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Read about this a while back. This is really interesting. After the end of the cold war, the navy deployed this shop in the Mediterranean to search for greek ship wrecks. They found thousands of ships, cargo, etc, all well-preserved after thousands of years by the cold depths of the medi.

    A UVic researcher is among a National Geographic Society team of oceanographers, engineers and archeologists that used a nuclear submarine to discover the largest concentration of ancient shipwrecks ever found in the deep sea. Dr. John Peter Oleson (Greek and Roman Studies) viewed the site off southern Italy and examined artifacts retrieved from 2,500 feet beneath an ancient Mediterranean Sea trade route by the remotely operated submersible Jason.

    More on it here.

    Then read about Richard Gere's Ass Zoo!

    tcd004

  4. Incompetent pilot? by MystikPhish · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the book excerpt: The ship was so stable that it automatically tried to keep itself level, which meant that as we came down the slope, the bow tended to rise and stay even with the stern. Only the rear wheel was touching the mud as the forward part of the boat angled slightly higher. That pointed the forward television cameras up too far to see anything on the bottom. That separation of the bow from the bottom also limited the effectiveness of the sonar.

    Maurer added still more water to the forward ballast tanks, which brought the bow down and put both wheels back in contact. Unfortunately, the extra ballast made the boat so heavy that the maximum upward force from the combined fore-and-aft thrusters would not be able to lift it. We rolled ahead.



    Why didn't the idiot pilot add a little water to the bow tanks and release some from the aft tanks? He was either totally incompetent (highly unlikely) or this "teaser" is made up... oh well..

    --
    "I'm about to drop the hammer and dispense some indiscriminate justice!"
  5. Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.... by Cheesemeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It takes a special kind of Nuke to ride NR-1....and the damn thing was never a secret...I personally have known about the thing for years....not only because I was a Nuke but because it has been in National Geographic a whole bunch of times. "If only we could harness this power for evil!"

    --
    If only I could harness this power for evil...
  6. Re:About the Book by Ponty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The excerpt is fantastic! First of all, the think had wheels and could roll along on the floor of the ocean. Check this out:
    -----------
    Maurer added still more water to the forward ballast tanks, which brought the bow down and put both wheels back in contact. Unfortunately, the extra ballast made the boat so heavy that the maximum upward force from the combined fore-and-aft thrusters would not be able to lift it. We rolled ahead.

    Wruble suddenly noticed a slight change in the character of the ocean floor, and then saw what looked like the edge of the world crawl beneath the little window. The front wheel ran off a precipice and Wruble heard a loud whummpp as the boat lurched and his head smacked some overhead pipes that sliced a cut in his scalp. The sound he heard was the bottom of the NR-1 scraping along a canyon rim. Blood ran down his face as he yelled into his microphone, "Go back! Go back! We're going over the edge!"

    But our forward, downward momentum made that impossible and over we went, slowly sinking into an unknown cavern. Wruble felt his stomach turn over, as if he was falling from a great height, for he saw nothing but blackness below. The weight that had glued us to the bottom now pulled us inexorably into the void, nose first. The submarine was a half mile deep, nearly a ton too heavy, and falling.

  7. So easy to use... by Istealmymusic · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...no wonder its NR-1!

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  8. What the sub was probably REALLY used for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.nr-1-book.com/images/CableLife.jpg

    Gee, I WONDER what the sub was doing around that cable! Yep, they were just wheelin' along and "Whoa! Look at that! A trans-atlantic phone cable! How'd we get near one of those with all this fancy nav gear?"

    Oceanography, indeed. Note all the comments about sonar systems being used to "identify" and "home in on" objects. I think we've just found the sub that was rumored to be able to splice into various undersea cables. Seriously- what do you need 300+ day run capability, secure comm equipment, and more types of sonar than you can shake a stick at?

    Does anyone actually believe that this thing was built because the USN wanted to take pretty pictures of crabs? If so, where's all the scientific equipment for measuring ocean conditions, collecting samples(I've always been a big fan of those critter-slurpers), all the normal "Zeee heello, I am Jacques Cousaeu!" stuff?

    Sorry, the thing has "spy toy" written all over it. Pathetic that our tax dollars went into it. Sounds to me like someone's trying to justify the money. "Well...uh....look! Some of the pictures have crabs in them! We did some oceanography while we were tapping that line!"

    1. Re:What the sub was probably REALLY used for by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2

      Uhhhh. Well, yeah. That's why it was a secret. Of course it was a spy-toy. It was the cold war. Youre tax dollars are now being spent on other spy toys.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  9. Re:Not Soldier....Sailor....Not Sailor....A Nuke.. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

    Nah - RM's and NavET's always beat the ELT's ashore.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  10. Re:I have to ask... by DredPirateRoberts · · Score: 3, Funny

    An Engineering Laboratory Technician... an enlisted nuclear chemist and radiological controls technician. If you have a spill of readioactive fluid, get yo'self one or two, they'll whine but they'll take care of the problem.

    --
    "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - George Orwell
  11. Re:First "Underway on nuclear power" post. by vegetablespork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're intelligent enough to be that far above the process, you're certainly intelligent enough to have done your research before volunteering for submarine duty, no? And once there, honorable enough to have honored your commitment to serve and aware enough to realize that lots of it is bullshit (as in life darned near anywhere), and to just deal?

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  12. Perfect for cable operations by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Considering its directly-downward crew viewport, and a claw manipulator capable of lifting roughly 1000 pounds (id wager there is a seperate claw control set right near the viewport), NR-1 would be perfect for tapping and/or interfearing with deep-water communications cables.

    Even today, when America has almost nothing in the way of global powers about which to spread FUD and justify massive military spending on a project such as this, NR-1 would still be extremely useful as an intelligence gatherer operating against foreign corporates in the interests of American compaines, via taps on shallow and deep-water data lines.

    Kind of makes you wonder if all those cable cuts in the north of Australia were really caused by ships anchors, or by FUBAR'd operations by boats such as the NR-1

    --
    Janie took my gun...
  13. Interesting tidbit by AllynM · · Score: 3, Interesting

    NR-1 is one (if not THE) smallest portable nuclear reactor in the world. The Army tried their hand at this back in the day. They wanted to make some tiny portable field power unit. Unfortunately all they managed to do was pin some poor sap to the ceiling with a control rod.
    Luckily the Navy builds their reactors in a safer fashion. ...yet another 2 cents...

    --
    this sig was brought to you by the letter /.
    1. Re:Interesting tidbit by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Only because that "poor sap" was a complete idiot.

      The army actually had a wide range of working small nuclear reactors of various sizes. They stopped only because the Vietnam war sucked up all the available money and there wasn't funds left over to continue non-war related research.

    2. Re:Interesting tidbit by MrWa · · Score: 3, Informative
      That was SL-1 and it demonstrates that not following procedures and, even worse, not understand WHY, can be a very dangerous thing. Making a nuclear reactor go supercritial (basically: the reactor is not only self-sustaining, but each reaction causes the reactor power to increase!) is a bad thing.

      Short story - someone purposely pulled a control out of a shutdown reactor too far, causing the reactor to become supercritial, emit a lot of steam, and impale him on the ceiling. The Army - since they didn't have Adm. Rickover (say what you want about him, he did make a very safe, very successful nuclear power program in the Navy) - should not be messing with nuclear power.

    3. Re:Interesting tidbit by AugustFalcon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah....
      What actually happened with the control rod was in fact an accident. That plant was shut down and was cold and depressurized. They were doing some maintenance on the rod drive mechanisms and were attempting to reinstall one of the rod drive mechanisms. To do so required that the control rod be raised a very short distance to reengage the mechanism. The rod stuck when he tried to move it. He pulled harder and it came unstuck and moved a short distance quite rapidly. Unfortunately the amount of reactivity from control rod movement is a function of the speed with which the rod is moved. The speed here caused the reactor to go critical just in the portion of the core at the bottom of this control rod which generated a very high localized temperature causing the moderator, i.e., the water at the bottom of the control rod channel to turn to superheated steam which because the rod mechanism was not installed served to eject the rod rapidly from the core and impale this poor guy on the ceiling far above.

      When I went through Naval Nuclear Power training this was one of the accidents we studied. They had pictures. The funniest one was the poor guy who had his mop head go critical when he mopped up a uranium containing solution (I think it was uranium hexaflouride) and then put it in the bucket's squeezer. The mop actully went critical and heated up to the point of steaming. He died a slow death over the next few days from the massive radiation dose.

    4. Re:Interesting tidbit by jimhill · · Score: 2

      "Making a nuclear reactor go supercritial ... is a bad thing."

      Oh, bullshit. You can't get a reactor from zero power to greater-than-zero power without going supercritical. Sheesh.

      "Captain! We're approaching the prompt jump!"

      "AIEEE! Abandon ship!"

      --
      Learn to spell: nickel, missile, lose, solely, amendment, speech, kernel, probably, ridiculous, deity, hierarchy, versus
    5. Re:Interesting tidbit by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 2

      the amount of reactivity from control rod movement is a function of the speed with which the rod is moved

      Nope. It is the presence or absence of a neutron absorbing material (in a damping control rod design) that determines reactivity. You aren't going to change accelleration of neutrons no matter how fast you are at pulling a rod. The guy killed pulled the rod out too far. It wouldn't have mattered if it took him a tenth of a second or a week.

      I'm guessing the Navy training you got may have slipped a bit over the years.

    6. Re:Interesting tidbit by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Moving the control rods is equivalent to pressing on the accelerator in a car. Saying that going supercritical is bad is like saying that you'd never want to make a car accelerate.

    7. Re:Interesting tidbit by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 2

      Not enough at human speeds to make a difference with pulling out a control rod. (And, don't tell me)

  14. Re:About the Book by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    Wruble suddenly noticed a slight change in the character of the ocean floor, and then saw what looked like the edge of the world crawl beneath the little window. The front wheel ran off a precipice and Wruble heard a loud whummpp as the boat lurched and his head smacked some overhead pipes that sliced a cut in his scalp. The sound he heard was the bottom of the NR-1 scraping along a canyon rim. Blood ran down his face as he yelled into his microphone, "Go back! Go back! We're going over the edge!"
    Sounds like a clip from " Voyage to see the bottom "...
  15. A submarine is... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    I long metal tube filled with semen... I mean seamen!

    Bruce

  16. Call 1-800-SOSUS by Genady · · Score: 2

    Have you boys never heard of SOSUS? Yeah, I'm sure that it was probably also used to tap 'secure' Soviet communications lines, but it was also probably a SOSUS repair truck.

    --


    What if it is just turtles all the way down?
    1. Re:Call 1-800-SOSUS by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 2

      I knew someone connected with that program who said they used to be able to hear Soviet subs leave the Baltic from their station at Tristan da Cunha in the South Atlantic. (About 6000 miles away)

  17. Nuclear cars by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 2

    They wanted to make some tiny portable field power unit. 15 years ago, I read an article about how East German (during the cold war) scientists had tried to build a nuclear car. The scientists failed because they couldn't isolate the nuclear reactor without the car being too heavy. Maybe it was for the best that they never managed to get these rolling nukes out on the streets. :)

  18. "No Escape" by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    OK, something I don't understand here. How was this boat special in that there was no escape if it got into trouble? I've seen the big training ascent tank back east, but how many sailors have actually made that trip and lived after damage to a sub?

    Bruce

    1. Re:"No Escape" by eyegor · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've heard that it's possible to escape from a couple hundred feet, but the odds of your survival are pretty slim. The longer it takes from the time you begin to pressurize the escape trunk to when you begin your assent, the more likely it is that you're going to get a very bad case of the bends. If that doesn't get you, there's also a VERY good chance you'll hold your breath just a tiny bit and blow out a lung due to overpressurization during your assent.

      In spite of what happened to the guys on the Kursk, most of the ocean is so fricking deep that your ship will crush LONG before you hit the bottom.

      Hence, escape training is largly a waste of time.

      When the ship crushes, the volume inside the ship gets VERY small, very quickly (think diesel engine). Everything bursts into flame, then you get hit in the face with a thousand piece of equipment, then the fire gets put out a split second later by tons of seawater. Fun...

      Beats being shot and laying in a muddy ditch with your guts hanging out.....

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
  19. The SL-1 incident by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Read the official report. While there's still some controversy over exactly how the accident occured, just reading the documentation is scary. Check "Table V - Control Rod Sticking Summary". 45 major stuck control rod incidents in two years. On three occasions, they couldn't get a control rod to go in at all. And this was in a 5-rod reactor that went critical with one rod out. Aargh. Even if they hadn't had an accident (some people think suicide or sabotage) while someone was working on a control rod drive, that reactor was an accident waiting to happen.

    The people working on the design knew it, and the reactor control rod system was being redesigned when the accident occured. This was a little reactor, developed as a crash program for a military project, and deliberately installed in the middle of nowhere so that should the worst-case accident occur, the effects wouldn't affect anybody other than those directly involved at the test site.

  20. HOW TO SIMULATE SUBMARINE LIFE AT HOME by bubblegoose · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, I spent a couple of years on a bigger submarine (LA class Fast Attack) Here's how you can get a feel for this stuff at home.

    Surround yourself with a few people you don't like. Close all windows and doors tightly, close curtains. Seal any openings to the outside world with a proper vault. Unplug all radios and TV sets to cut yourself off completely from news, football games, Saturday Night Live, the Muppet Show, etc.

    Hourly monitor all operating home appliances, if not in use, log as secured. If using the bathroom, do not flush toilet for first two days to simulate smell of blowing sanitaries and venting inboard. Then flush daily.

    Wear only approved FBM coveralls, or proper Navy uniforms. No hats, special T-shirts, etc. Cut your hair once a week ensuring that you make it look like hell. Work 18-hour day intervals to ensure your body really gets confused. Listen to the same cassette over and over until you can't stand it anymore, and then put in one that you can't even listen to without acute nausea setting in. Set your alarm to go off just as you fall asleep, with alarm set at loud, or buy a special alarm clock with various settings, (i.e., "Man Battle Stations, Fire, Flooding in the Basement").

    Prepare food with a blindfold on to simulate what real submarine cooks do. Then take the blindfold off and try to get your dog to eat it. Then break out a can of tuna and/or peanut butter.

    Cut your bed in half, and enclose all but one side using the dimensions of a small casket as a reference. When not in bed, make up blankets properly so no one will see or care.

    Periodically, for want of excitement, open main power breaker and run around yelling, "Reactor Scram", until you are sweating profusely, then restore power. Buy yourself a snorkel and mask, and again, periodically, just for want of nothing else to do, put it on and pretend you're in a smoke filled room with no way out. For added variety, hook up the garden hose and pressurize it.

    To enable yourself to handle anything, constantly study wiring diagrams and operating instructions for various home appliances (stove, refrigerator, can opener). For no reason at all, at specified intervals (monthly, weekly, etc.) tear one item apart, just in case it was going to break down.

    Paint everything around you gray (Navy FSN gray, no substitutes) or off-white. To be sure you are living in a clean and happy environment, every Friday, set alarm on loud for a short but hated drill sound, then get up and manned with only a bucket and sponge and greeny, clean one area over and over, even if it was already spotless. Then make out a discrepancy list.

    Once a day, after normal programming hours, plug in TV and watch one movie being careful that it is (a) at least five years old, (b) made long enough prior to showing to be sure that you've seen it at least once before, or (c) be so bad you have to install a seatbelt in your chair to keep you there until it is over.

    Since no doctor will be available, stockpile Band-Aids, aspirin, and Actifed as these are proven cure-alls. Practice if necessary on your dog (surgery, dentistry, or death).

    When commencing this test simulation, lock your family, friends, and anything that means anything to you outside. Tests will run for at least two months with no end in sight.

    --
    I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
  21. Re:A submarine is... a big, long, phallus joke? by geoswan · · Score: 2
    I long metal tube filled with semen... I mean seamen!

    And how can you tell that Santa Claus is really a potent male fertility symbol?

    Well, what else can you think of that keeps sliding up and down long, dark, warm, hidden vertical passages, leaving presents at the bottom?

    (No, I didn't make this up, I heard author Margaret Visser say this in a TV interview.)

    (Yeah, I know this is off-topic, but what the heck, I have a few extra karma points.)

    Oh yeah, Bruce, thanks for your terrific contributions in the open source movement.

  22. Class B Nuke? by Gekko · · Score: 2

    I only know of two class b submarines. Both were non nuclear. The USS Bass(SS-164) was a US Class B sub, and the Brits had a class B costal sub. You must be old as hell pops. The Bass was used for target practice in 1945, and the british class b was builit in 1904.

    --
    I mod down any one who says "I'm sure I will get modded down for this"
  23. RN thinks different by hughk · · Score: 2

    The Royal Navy still has an escape tower filled with water at their training centre in Gosport and to get your submariner rating, you had to practice there. Escapes are definitely considered survivable from 100 metres which is why there is training.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:RN thinks different by eyegor · · Score: 2

      I believe it's possible to escape from deeper depths as well. I was always taught that we shouldn't say the ship can go any deeper than 400 feet. Hence, I tend to fudge a bit when discussing depths.

      As a SCUBA diver, I have a pretty good handle on the physics involved and I'm pretty sure that as long as I don't have to worry about hytothermia, I'd be a surviver.

      We had to do escape training while in Sub School in Groton, CT. I thought it was a hoot. I wanted to do it again.

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    2. Re:RN thinks different by hughk · · Score: 2
      I would observe that I definitely wouldn't like to do this, I didn't like coming up from 10 metres when I took my PADI Open Water.

      The reason this came to light was when the Kursk went down. The discussion was that the RN was one of the few fleets to still train all their sub crews to do this and to carry the escape equipment. The Russians were in the past (at least the subs had escape compartments), but the USN didn't consider this option as they have DSVs for rescue.

      OTOH, coming up in the Barents sea definitely wouldn't be nice.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  24. By definition it was an intelligence submarine! by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    It's obvious that given the sub had a nuclear powerplant it was going to be used on clandestine, secret operations in Soviet territorial waters to monitor Soviet Navy movements. NR-1 was probably the best submarine to quietly monitor the home bases of the Northern Fleet, the Soviet Navy's primary fleet for operations against NATO.

    What's interesting is that the Soviets never built anything like NR-1. The Soviets had built a series of miniature submarines for Spetsnaz operations in Norwegian fjords but they never did build anything akin to NR-1, even though Soviet submarine designers could have easily designed and built such a craft. Maybe the poor state of Soviet nuclear reactor design prevented the NR-1'ski from being built?