Slashdot Mirror


Animated Star Wars on Cartoon Network

NeoCode writes "There were rumours and speculations first. Now it looks like its a done deal. Harry Knowles, of AintItCool.com has reports on an animated version of Star Wars set after AOTC but before episode 3. This series is produced by Genndy Tartakovsky (Dexter's Lab, Powerpuff Girls, Samurai Jack). The cartoons will be a series of short films. Could this infuse Star Wars with a new life or is this just another merchandising plot? Nevertheless, this could be quite interesting." Yeah look what good Ewoks & Droids did for the SW universe ;)

13 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "It takes a long time to become young." -- Pablo Picasso

  2. Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There've been a lot of Star Wars spin offs and related items (books, video games, etc) that contradict or alter the details of the movies. How could it really make a big difference? These little pop-culture universes are malleable, just like any sort of folk-lore.

    --
    Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
  3. Re:Hi by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So, this is a troll, right? I'll bite anyway, because my lunch is still cooking...

    I'll be finished my first degree (Chemical Physics) in the spring. I rent, but I pay for it myself. I ride a bike because it's cheaper and better for the environment. (Ironic that you work in the Department of...Atmospheric Science, eh?) I love to cook. And yes, you have lost touch with us all.

    'Growing up' doesn't have to be about losing touch with your sense of wonder. Heck, it's what will keep me going in the sciences in grad school.

    Oh, and for the record, I loved Lilo & Stitch.

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  4. same author as samurai jack by hfastedge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If its by tartakovski, i seriously think that this will be amazing.

    Samurai Jack is one of the most peaceful, and exhilirating cartoons I have watched. The director is not afraid of satisfying the modern day attention span. Rather, I find this show to be a truly artistic maverick in company with other more marketable shows. Example: in a given episode of Jack, you can easily find 2-3 minutes of pure silence, which brings out the mood of 2 great warriors resting midway through a battle, or a quiet brook trickling next to a snowy field where our hero is seen in the corner of the screen slowly making his way.

    Yet....the show is sorta cooky AND funny at times. Its VERY well done, as emersive as Aeon Flux for sure.

    I know the cartoon will be good.

    --

    -- -- --

    Help my mini cause: My journal

  5. Moo.... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thats the sound of the cash cow, getting milked for all its worth.

    If they make a Star Wars cartoon, they can make a whole new range of merchandise to keep em going until Ep3 comes out..

    I wish they weren't so bloody obvious about it though.

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  6. Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The SW Expanded Universe (i.e., any story in a medium that's not the films: games, comics, novels, TV) has always been rather consistent with the original trilogy of films, and elements that originated in the EU were incorporated into the prequel films (the name of the Republic capital planet from the Thrawn novels, a Twi'lek Jedi from the comics, other names from places like the Droids series). The few problems have had "continuity fixes" in place for a long time now. Moreover, LucasFilm Licensing has always strived to make the EU consistent with itself, and you'll see things like novels referencing game characters (like the main character from the X-Wing PC games being a prominent general in the last New Jedi Order novel).

    This series is rumored to involve the Clone Wars, and LFL held a fairly large summit last summer to plot out the war's major events and decide in which medium they'll be covered. Episode III begins with the last battle of the Clone Wars, so there's no danger of something zany happening in the next film to throw out all the events being depicted in the interim. There's already been several post-AotC EU titles announced and released showing war events:

    • Galactic Battlegrounds: Clone Campaigns (game)
    • Clone Wars (game)
    • The New Droid Army (game)
    • Boba Fett: Fight to Survive and Crossfire (children's novels)
    • Republic #49 and on (comic)
    • Shatterpoint (novel)
    There's an article on the CW publishing program here:

    http://www.starwars.com/eu/news/2002/11/news200211 15.html

    SW licensed stories/etc. are different from things like Trek in that they're edited rigorously precisely to prevent continuity problems. It's all meant to be one story (whether it's a good one or not varies from audience member to audience member).

  7. Lucas in it for the money, again by Gary+Franczyk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wouldn't get too enthused about it just yet. It has been evident that George Lucas not been in touch with the Star Wars phenomenon since Jedi. Since then, he has only been extending his retirement fund with poor quality "extensions" on the original masterpiece.

    - Rerelease of the originals with "additional" footage, with a slew of promotional and marketing gimmicks.
    - Three prequels, with a slew of promotional and marketing gimmicks.
    and now:
    - A cartoon version, with a slew of promotional and marketing gimmicks.

    1. Re:Lucas in it for the money, again by dswensen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the slew of promotional and marketing gimmicks that have been an inherent part of Star Wars since day one...

      Were you not alive in 1977? Merchandise has always been part of Star Wars. Merchandising makes money and keeps Pepsi ads out of the Coruscant billboards. More power to them is what I say.

      Moreover, little kids like action figures. When I was a kid, I had a ton of them. Was I being marketed to? Was Lucas making money because I liked action figures? Hell yes. But I also got a whole lot of fun out of it, and many fond memories of my childhood, and many entertaining conversations with good friends about the cool stuff we had when we were kids.

      And now, because I'm grown up and don't like action figures anymore, it suddenly has to be wrong and evil and George Lucas should die penniless and alone on some street corner for the unforgivable sin of spending his whole life trying to entertain himself and us, and kids today just don't get it and turn down that durn rock and roll music...

      Give it a rest. If you're so principled, go make your own movie, with money from your own pocket, and then sell it at a tremendous loss. Then you'll have proved yourself the better man.

    2. Re:Lucas in it for the money, again by fpp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, you really don't know Lucas at all...

      For him, it's never been about the money. If it were, he would be cranking out Star Wars movies like James Bond films, and there would be 20 of them by now.

      The re-release of the films in 1997 was done not for money, but for several other key reasons:

      1) to restore the film, because the negative was badly deteriorated (if it hadn't been done at that time, the original negative would not have lasted another few years)
      2) to use the trilogy as a test bed for some new effects that he would need to have ready for Episode I
      3) as a kind of litmus test, to see if the public was still receptive to the aging franchise (which of course, it was)

      The merchandising is an important aspect of the films, as it allows Lucas to stay an independent producer. The money generated from it subsidizes Lucasfilm, ILM, THX, LucasArts, Skywalker Sound, the Ranch, etc...

  8. Re:Hi by lvdrproject · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Sigh... either i'm looking harder, or people are getting lamer and lamer recently. While i'm obviously younger than you (which might bias me just a touch), allow me to explain something.

    You associate cartoons with childishness. Just because it's animated doesn't make it any less mature than your favourite live-action movie/TV series. There are many serious-minded, dramatic animated features ("Grave of the Fireflies", anyone?), and there are a number of advantages cartoons have over live action:

    Virtually-unlimited special effects budget. In animation, you don't have to pay millions upon millions of dollars to show someone jumping out of a huge time portal, or show some horrific monster eat a man whole, or show a squadron of soldiers firing laser cannons. This is as simple to create in animation as anything else.

    Character "casting". You don't have to hunt down the perfect actor/actress with the perfect weight, the perfect hair colour, the perfect voice, the perfect skin colour, etc., etc., in animation. You just draw the character the way you want him/her to appear, and there s/he is.

    Idealism. The world just doesn't work the way some people want it to. You can't change the laws of physics, every single person you find won't be attractive, etc.. Cartoons work the way you want them to, whether they're realistic, deep, moving depictions of life (like many anime series/movies), or goofy, childish Saturday-morning cartoons (which can be masterpieces, despite their childishness).

    What does the fact that you perform the same tasks as any other adult (and some teenagers) have anything to do with cartoons or video games? Seems to me like you've been brainwashed by some of the "intelligent" connoisseur types who associate these things with childishness/immaturity/unintelligence. This same phenomenon can be observed with Pokemon. The Game Boy games (which few who bash it have even played) are actually quite fun, and aren't really any more childish than any other game. What started this whole "Pokemon is for kids, you fanboy losers" thing is the fact that some American corporations saw that Pokemon made money, and they milked it for all that they could. They sold dolls, they sold stuffed animals, they sold cards, they sold McDonald's toys. THAT is why people hate Pokemon. If it had gone on as a regular Game Boy game like any other Game Boy game, nobody would've given it a second thought. Same thing happened to cartoons.

    Anyway, video games, Harry Potter, anime, and cartoons are forms of entertainment, no different than your favourite band, your favourite TV show, or your favourite book. If it ENTERTAINS you, it's served its purpose.

    :Lav

  9. Re:Hi by EvilCabbage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Watching fine animated shorts helps me unwind after dealing with self important jerk-offs all day.

    Generally, the kind that feel the need to let me know about their education, car, and / or family.

    Now, try sitting down in front of something like, Samuri Jack, Aqua Teen Hunger Force,Invader Zim or, god forbid, The Powerpuff Girls, have a Coke(tm), and try to enjoy yourself for a change.

    You'd be amazed how good things work out, when the creators have a hand in making the animation come to life, and dont just sell out to a studio, and let their characters get whored out in marketing promotions.

    Cheerio.

  10. Umm...different details. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like making people look like people.

    Dexter is roughly the shape of a pill. Dee-dee and her friends have all of her limbs extending from a single point. All legs look like they did in the flintstones - like pipes that have a turn and end with a round stub (the turn is where the feet begin).

    Almost nobody has any noses, or the noses look very strange. Also, no one has normal looking hands - very few have thumbs, or a full complement of fingers (10 total). The powerpuff girls have no hands and no feet. Samurai Jack is a little better, but still...there is very little detail in the characters. Jack himself has fingers that are apparently glued together, since they never seem to separate. Also, his four fingers are all the same length, unlike human fingers (his thumb is opposable, they show that when he holds a sword).

    I would expect a Star Wars Universe to be much more lifelike since its based upon a live action universe, with, at the very least, five fingers on each hand, and the ability to move them the way humans do, and normally drawn noses. I don't expect that it'll happen because I think it costs more.

    Which means really, really bad reviews, I think.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  11. Re:Additions to, complications of "the canon"? by blincoln · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is hearsay, but I think that Lucas very carefully goes over the details of anything Star Wars to make sure the details are consistent with the rest of the universe before it gets the official seal of approval.

    Haha, I seriously hope you were joking.

    If not, have a look at The Star Wars Holiday Special, novels like The Crystal Star, or pretty much any of the videogames to see any number of contradictions and alterations.

    IMO, the only detail anyone at Lucasfilm is concerned with re: spinoff products are the royalty fees.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman